Are you in favor or against the Reproductive Health Law, Explain Why or Why not?
50 words
Answer:
Since 40 years have passed since the Supreme Court granted women the legal right to an abortion in its landmark case Roe v. Wade, the issue is still roiled in controversy, as antiabortion groups and state legislatures attempt to chip away at a woman’s right to choose. Over the past two years, 135 new state-level abortion restrictions were enacted. Additionally, 20 states are allowing insurers or employers to deny women affordable contraception by refusing to comply with Obamacare’s birth-control mandate.
In spite of those hurdles, pro-choice advocates have not given up in their fight for reproductive justice. The passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, for example, was certainly a victory for those who want to make family-planning tools accessible to all women because it increased health insurance coverage for women while lowering their health costs. Thanks to the health care reform law, millions of more women of color have access to contraception starting in August 2012.
Yet, as the following facts show, there’s still work to be done to ensure that all women especially women of color can access their legal right to decide when and whether to be a parent. Below are the top 10 reasons why women of color have a particularly significant stake in the conversation on abortion and reproductive rights.
Hope this helps, have a nice day! :D
An incident occurred at a walking trail which is often a hot spot for athletic
enthusiasts, dog walkers, and families. Chris is a 16-year-old who was
allegedly with a group of high school students who approached a pair of
joggers on a local trail, surrounded them, and demanded their cell phones.
The joggers handed their phones to other members of the group and ran
away. The joggers quickly found someone else with a phone and reported the
incident. The police found Chris with a group of high schoolers near the scene
and want to question Chris about his involvement.
• Under what circumstances can the police question Chris?
• Assume that Chris's parents are out of the country. Under what circumstances
can Chris be
interrogated, if any?
The police can question Chris about his involvement in the alleged incident if they have reasonable suspicion that he may have committed a crime.
If Chris's parents are out of the country, the police may still be able to question him if he is considered an adult under the law.
What will happen to Chris ?In this case, the police found Chris with a group of high schoolers near the scene of the incident, which may be sufficient grounds for them to question him about what happened. It is important to note that Chris has the right to remain silent and to request a lawyer if he is being questioned by the police. He should also be informed of these rights before any questioning takes place.
In most states in the U.S., a person is considered an adult at age 18. However, some states may consider a 16-year-old to be an adult in certain circumstances, such as when they are charged with a serious crime.
In this case, if Chris is considered an adult under the law, the police may be able to question him without his parents present or without their consent.
Find out more on circumstances at https://brainly.com/question/12178843
#SPJ1
Which of the following might make you suspect that an ID is fake?
•The ID feels thinner or thicker than usual.
•Fuzzy printing or different font on the birth date.
•Bar codes or magnetic strips on the back will not scan.
•All of the above.
The following would possibly make you think that an ID is fake: it is probably thinner or thicker, printed with fuzzy bar codes, or bar code strips on back.
What is an ID?Identityentification is the impulsive part of our psyche which responds at once and at once to fundamental urges, needs, and desires. The persona of the new child is all identityentification, and best of all, it expands an ego and super-ego.
From the above rationalization, it's clear that alternative D, all of the above, is the right alternative.
Learn more about ID, refer to:
brainly.com/question/4774641
#SPJ2
ALAP
What is law really
the congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.True/False
The statement the congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. is true as This statement is directly quoted from the 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which was ratified in 1913.
The 16th Amendment to the US Constitution gives Congress the authority to levy income taxes without having to divide them up among the states according to population or any other factor. The following is th amendment's complete text:
Without considering any census or enumeration and without apportioning income among the various States, the Congress shall have the authority to levy and collect taxes on incomes from any source.
Congress put forth the 16th Amendment in 1909, and the necessary number of states ratified it in 1913. It marked a significant change from earlier constitutional interpretations that had maintained that direct taxes needed to be distributed among the states based on population. The amendment gave Congress a lot of power.
To know more about taxes here
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
#SPJ4
Tactical treats can be performed in a variety of ways. Which way is not correct.
Coordinated
Coordinated
Ruse
Ruse
Deliberate
Deliberate
Dynamic
Dynamic
Check out this app! It's millions of students helping each other get through their schoolwork. https://brainly.app.link/qpzV02MawO
Answer:
Woww ok
Explanation: I B STUCK TO YU LIKE GLUE OUUU I-i-i CANT MAKE NVM
ASSIGNMENT
Frank lives and works in a city. He owns numerous tracts of land in a county outside the city where he hunts and fishes. Mike, who has never met Frank, starts living in a cabin in a remote section of Frank's land. At first Mike just stayed on the week-ends, but for the last 22 years he has made the cabin his home and made improvements to it. Mike now claims the cabin and surrounding area he possesses is his property.
Explain what factors represent each element of adverse possession. Will Mike get title to the land?
The 22 years, without interruption, that Mike used Frank's land and the fact that Frank did not claim or oppose it establish the elements of possession and time of adverse possession. The fact that Mike gave a function to the used land represents the element called the skillful thing of adverse possession.
Milke will obtain title to the land.
How to explain the elements of adverse possession?Skillful thing: Mik gave a social function to a land that had potential but was not being used.Time: Make spent a lot of time without an interruption in this land.Ownership: Frank, as the owner of the land, has not claimed ownership in 22 years.Adverse possession is a legal way of acquiring the property rights of a private asset that has been without social function for a long time.
In this case, to establish adverse possession on a piece of land, someone must invade some privately owned land, build a residence and live there for many years uninterrupted.
Furthermore, the legal owner of these lands must not claim them during these years, allowing another individual to continue using them for a long time.
Adverse possession is a way to avoid the accumulation of properties, mainly those that have no function and are not used by their owners.
Although adverse possession is a legal system, it does not apply to public goods, as the law considers that these goods belong to the entire community and are used by it in different ways.
Learn more about public goods:
https://brainly.com/question/14664702
#SPJ1
A democratic government differs from a dictatorship in the way that it:
A.gives more power to religious leaders.
B.divides power between more people.
C.enforces laws more strictly.
D.divides wealth more evenly.
Answer:
B divides power between more people
dictatorship has 1 leader while a democracy has more than 1
which of the following was a factor that contributed to the growth of nationalism in europe as a powerful political and personal identity in the nineteenth century?
Older identities being undermined as a result of Europe's modernization is one of the factors that contributed to the growth of nationalism in Europe as a powerful political and personal identity in the nineteenth century.
The transition to modernity began in the nations of northwest Europe, particularly in England, the Netherlands, northern France, and northern Germany, between the 16th and 18th centuries.
The 16th century had a significant period of economic growth. The numerous other changes—social, political, and cultural—of the early modern era were greatly influenced by this expansion.
According to Western European histories, the modern era began at the close of colonial invasion and early 19th-century worldwide expansion. In general, the time after the invention of modern warfare, which was characterized by two world wars and was followed by postmodernism, served as an example of modernity.
To learn more about Modernization in Europe, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15212797
#SPJ4
Which of the following individuals or groups can make laws? Select all that apply.
US. Congress
a state legislature
the Supreme Court
a high school principal
a neighborhood association
a the President of the United States
Answer:
state legislature the supreme court
A relationship created by an implied or an express agreement or by law, that empowers one of the parties by word or action to legally bind the other is a(n) _______________________.
The answer is "agency relationship". An agency relationship is created when one party, known as the agent, is authorized to act on behalf of another party, known as the principal, through an implied or express agreement or by law. The agent has the power to legally bind the principal through their actions or words, and the principal is responsible for the actions of the agent within the scope of their authority.
Agency relationship is a type of legal relationship where one person or entity acts as a representative for another person or entity. This relationship is created by mutual consent between the agent and the principal and can be formed through various means, such as a written contract, oral agreement, or through the actions of the parties.
The agent is authorized to act on behalf of the principal and can make legally binding decisions and enter into contracts on their behalf. The principal is responsible for any actions taken by the agent within the scope of their authority and is also responsible for providing the agent with the necessary resources to carry out their duties.
To know more about agency relationship visit:
brainly.com/question/15129864
#SPJ11
In determining whether a witness is credible, an investigator should (check all that apply):
A. observe the witness's demeanor while speaking
B. refrain from reaching conclusions about a witness's veracity
C. consider the witness's bias and motive to testify
D. consider whether the individual has the ability to make an effective witness
Hallar todas las θ entre 0 0
y 360 0
para la función circular que es igual al valor indicado. secθ=−2 a. −2π/3,4π/3 b. 2π/3,π/6 c. 3
2π
, 3
4π
d. 3
π
, 3
La función secθ=-2 no tiene soluciones en el intervalo de 0 a 360 grados.
Learn more about función here:
brainly.com/question/24122774
#SPJ11
Which numbWhich number on the map shows the location of Florida?er on the map shows the location of Florida?
The number on the given map that shows the location of Florida in the United States is 1.
Where is Florida located?Florida is located to the South-Eastern part of the United States where it is a peninsula that extends downwards.
It is located above Cuba which is labeled as 2 which means that Florida is denoted by the number, 1.
Find out more on Florida at https://brainly.com/question/6590614.
#SPJ1
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
Many people in an area have lost their jobs and are about to lose their homes because they cannot make their monthly mortgage payments Jane , a lawyer , writes to all of these people saying she is willing to represent them to prevent the loss of their homes . Should she allowed to do this ?
PLEASE HELP!!!
Answer:
It's up to her.
Explanation:
I'm no lawyer but I think that they get to pick and choose if they want to accept any cases or not. I think that if she wants to take the risk to represent them, then she should be allowed to.
T/F Well-written social media policies of a firm are consistent with its organizational culture and values.
A company's social media policies should reflect the corporate culture and values of the company. it is true
Social media are interactive media platforms that make it easier to create and share content through online communities and networks, including information, ideas, interests, and other kinds of expression. Despite difficulties in defining social media due to the range of standalone and integrated social media services currently offered, there are certain common characteristics: Social media are Web 2.0 Internet-based interactive apps. The lifeblood of social media is user-generated content, which includes written postings or comments, digital photographs or videos, and statistics from all online interactions.
Learn more about social media from
brainly.com/question/23976852
#SPJ4
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
Sometimes, in special situations, the entire circuit court's bench will sit together for a case. What is this called
A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teacher, the principal search is the lockers of three students and finds a pocket knife in one student's locker. The other two lockers turned up nothing. 3) On the high school campus authorities be allowed to search students lockers whenever they want?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
what are common reasons for the filing of dental malpractice cases
Dental malpractice is a civil legal action that holds dentists responsible for injuries caused to patients as a result of negligence or misconduct. Here are the common reasons for the filing of dental malpractice cases:
Dental malpractice can occur as a result of a dental professional's negligence, errors, or misconduct during diagnosis, treatment, or follow-up care. The following are the most common causes of dental malpractice claims: Failure to diagnose oral diseases: Dentists have a responsibility to recognize oral diseases such as oral cancer, gum disease, and other dental conditions as soon as possible.
When a dentist fails to diagnose an oral condition, it can cause significant harm to the patient and lead to further complications. Misdiagnosis: A dentist may diagnose a patient with a dental condition that does not exist, resulting in unnecessary dental work. This can cause financial burden to the patient and may lead to other dental problems. Failure to obtain informed consent: Dentists must obtain informed consent from patients before performing any dental procedure. This means that patients should be informed of the procedure's benefits and risks, as well as any potential complications. Failure to obtain informed consent can result in a dental malpractice lawsuit.
Dental negligence: Dental negligence can occur when a dentist performs a procedure that causes injury or harm to a patient. Dental negligence can include using incorrect tools or equipment, not following safety protocols, or not providing adequate follow-up care. Breach of duty: Dental professionals must provide a standard of care that meets the accepted medical or dental practices in their area of expertise. When a dentist fails to provide an acceptable standard of care, it is known as a breach of duty, and it can lead to dental malpractice lawsuits. A common breach of duty is when a dentist uses outdated techniques or fails to follow proper sterilization procedures. These are some of the common reasons for the filing of dental malpractice cases.
To know more about Malpractice visit-
brainly.com/question/28612845
#SPJ11
The FBLA-PBL organization that supports working professionals is O A. PBL OB. PD O C. FBLA D. ML
The correct answer is B, which indicates that PBL, or Phi Beta Lambda, is the collegiate division of FBLA-PBL that provides support for working professionals.
This organization helps individuals develop their leadership and business skills through various programs, such as competitive events, networking opportunities, and community service projects. PBL offers an array of resources to its members, including career fairs, professional development workshops, and scholarship opportunities.
Whether you're a college student seeking to gain experience and skills or a working professional aiming to expand your network and advance your career, PBL can be a valuable organization to join. PBL has a strong commitment to community service and leadership development, empowering its members to make positive impacts in their communities and the world. Overall, PBL is an excellent choice for anyone interested in pursuing a career in business or leadership.
Know more about FBLA-PBL organization here:
https://brainly.com/question/28844194
#SPJ11
The division of the FBLA-PBL organization that supports working professionals is Phi Beta Lambda (PBL). FBLA-PBL is made up of four different groups, each targeted towards a specific educational or career level. PBL is designed for postsecondary, college, and university students and aims to fuse business with education.
Explanation:The FBLA-PBL organization that supports working professionals is PBL, which stands for Phi Beta Lambda. The FBLA-PBL organization consists of four divisions including Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) for high school students, Middle Level (ML) for junior high and middle school kids, Professional Division (PD) for professional, educators, businesspersons, and parents, and Phi Beta Lambda (PBL) for postsecondary, college, and university students. PBL's aim is to bring business and education together in a positive working relationship through innovative leadership and career development programs.
Learn more about FBLA-PBL here:https://brainly.com/question/32225544
#SPJ12
HELP MEEEEEE PLEASE FAST
An ice hockey puck travels 18m in 3s before it slides what is the speed of the traveling puck??
A. 6 m/s
B. 9 m/s
C. 15 m/s
D. 54 m/s
When studying business law, students should also study ethics in a business context. According to your text, ethics is the study of
1Religious behavior and decisions.
2Financially rewarding behavior and decisions.
3Culturally acceptable behavior and decisions.
4Socially responsible behavior and decisions.
5Good or right behavior and decisions.
Answer: 4. Socially responsible behavior and decisions.
Explanation:
Ethics is the study of the norms and principles of behavior that are acceptable in society. They are usually unspoken and represent what is expected of people even if the law does not explicitly state it.
Ethics are meant to be socially acceptable instead of religious or cultural because society today has people of various religious and cultures so a general approach is needed. Culture and religion do however play a major part in ethics.
Although every crime scene is unique, discuss the components of and things to be considered when conducting a scene assessment.
Answer:
When conducting a scene assessment, several important components and considerations should be taken into account, including safety, preservation of evidence, documentation, interviews, reconstruction, analysis, and collaboration. Thorough attention to detail, effective communication, and a commitment to preserving evidence and reconstructing the events that occurred are essential for a successful investigation.
Explanation:
When conducting a scene assessment, there are several components to consider in order to ensure a thorough and accurate investigation. Although every crime scene is unique, the following are some of the most important components and considerations:
Safety: The safety of all individuals involved in the investigation should be the top priority. This includes law enforcement officers, first responders, and any potential witnesses. The scene should be secured, and any potential hazards should be identified and addressed.
Preservation of evidence: All potential evidence should be identified and preserved. This includes physical evidence such as fingerprints, DNA, and trace evidence, as well as any potential digital evidence such as surveillance footage or electronic communication records.
Documentation: Detailed documentation of the scene is essential in order to accurately reconstruct the events that occurred. This includes taking photographs, sketching the layout of the scene, and taking detailed notes.
Interviews: Any potential witnesses or individuals with information related to the crime should be interviewed. This can help to provide additional information and context to the investigation.
Reconstruction: The scene should be reconstructed in order to determine how the crime occurred. This can involve examining the physical evidence and interviewing witnesses in order to develop a clear timeline of events.
Analysis: All evidence and information gathered at the scene should be analyzed in order to determine potential suspects and motives. This can involve reviewing surveillance footage, conducting background checks on potential suspects, and collaborating with other law enforcement agencies.
Collaboration: Effective collaboration between all parties involved in the investigation is essential in order to ensure a thorough and accurate investigation. This can involve working with other law enforcement agencies, forensic specialists, and prosecutors.
Overall, conducting a thorough scene assessment involves careful attention to detail, effective communication and collaboration, and a commitment to preserving evidence and reconstructing the events that occurred.
A successful scene assessment at a crime scene is fundamentally based on three components - preservation of the scene, documentation, and evidence collection. Other factors like type of crime, time, location, witnesses, and environmental conditions are also considered. Every crime scene is unique requiring a distinctive assessment approach, albeit the basic components stay consistent.
Explanation:Conducting a scene assessment at a crime scene is a meticulous and deliberate process that requires a systematic approach. The primary components considered when doing a scene assessment include the preservation of the crime scene, thorough documentation, and evidence collection.
Preservation of the crime scene is crucial to avoid contamination or loss of evidence. This may involve cordoning off the area and controlling who has access to the crime scene. Documentation plays a central role in a scene assessment. This can include photographs, sketches, and detailed notes about the condition of the scene and the positions of evidence. Evidence collection involves identifying, recording, marking, packaging, and transporting evidence to preserve its integrity for lab analysis and possibly, use in court proceedings.
Apart from these core components, a scene assessment also takes into account other factors such as the time of the crime, location, any witnesses, type of crime committed, and environmental conditions. Each crime scene is unique, and as such, requires a unique approach for its assessment, but the components remain fundamentally consistent across all investigations.
Learn more about Scene Assessment here:https://brainly.com/question/34194009
#SPJ2
The outside wall of the Town Court has a mural of the American flag, Twin Towers, and screeching bald eagle painted on it by members of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. One night, Russ Toleum spray paints a message over every aspect of the mural. The message is, “Canada – like America but Better, Eh.” The security cameras on the property clearly pick up Russ’s face and he is charged with defacing public property. Russ claims he was merely adding to the mural that was already there and that his right to free speech has been violated. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court.
Answer:
It is a crime to deface public property, because it isn't yours personally. How would Russ like it if someone spray painted something offensive on his car? They were just expressing free speech! "Free Speech" Is not an excuse to commit a crime, Free Speech is just the liberty of saying what you want whether it's controversial or not.
Explanation:
What states can you sue for alienation of affection.
Answer:
HawaiiIllinois Mississippi New MexicoNorth Carolina South Dakota Utahtwo nations are stockpiling nuclear weapons. each see's the others actions as an act of aggression and its own actions as self-defense. evidently, these nations are victims of
These countries are the victims of the basic attribution mistake.
Define fundamental attribution error.The tendency for people to overemphasise dispositional and personality-based explanations while underemphasizing situational and contextual factors for an individual's observed behaviour is known as the fundamental attribution error, also known as correspondence bias or the attribution effect.
Understanding the fundamental attribution fallacy is essential because it can deceive you into thinking that someone else's behavior is the product of internal elements despite research showing that typical human behavior is significantly influenced by external influences. For example, if someone doesn't pick up the phone, you might conclude they're mean (internal), yet they may just not have gotten your message (external).
To know more about fundamental attribution error, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15466443
#SPJ4
Do you think problem-solving courts are beneficial? Why or why not?
The problem-solving courts are beneficial or not may depend on numerous factors, like any kind of the specific needs of the community, the availability of any resources, and also the effectiveness of the court's programs and its interventions.
What are problem-solving courts?Problem solving courts are referred to as specialized courts that specifically aim to address all the underlying issues which usually contribute to any type of criminal behavior. These types of courts often offer treatment, counselling, and various other support services to help the defendants overcome challenges like addiction, mental illness, and homelessness.
Advocates practicing in these types of problem-solving courts usually argue that they can help in reducing recidivism rates, save money on incarceration costs, and also went on to provide more effective and compassionate justice.
Various researches has shown that problem-solving courts can be a very effective tool in reducing recidivism rates for certain type of populations, including drug offenders, veterans, and people with mental illness.
Apart from this, critics of these problem-solving courts often argue that these courts may be too lenient on offenders and that they also kind of divert resources away from traditional criminal justice approaches.
To know more about court refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30039981
Yes, problem-solving courts are beneficial because it helps in the rehabilitation of selected defendants.
What is the problem-solving courts?The problem-solving courts can be described as the court that helps in the supervision of the treatment as well as the rehabilitation of the defendants .
It should be noted that the court do help in the process of helping people especially in the behaviour of the people and how tyhey can be reintroduced into the society so that theycab change their behaviour in the sense that the can become a new person and a better person.
Learn more about courts at:
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1