janice wanted to sell her townhome, and her neighbor was considering buying it. she wanted to put it on the market while she waited to find out if her neighbor was going to buy. in order to receive the best possible representation but avoid paying a commission if her neighbor buys the property, which type of listing agreement would best suit janice's needs? and signatures of all parties; and .

The president has the power to grab and hold the public's attention and so increase support for initiatives and policies.

In accordance with the Constitution, the president has the authority to issue pardons and reprieves, command the armed forces, request the written advice of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, and welcome diplomats.

As a result, a President may issue an executive order to avoid the red tape of Congress and forward policy goals without going through the legislative process. Although an executive memorandum is similar to an executive order, it does not follow the same formal procedures.

Learn more about the executive here:

brainly.com/question/18052177

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

This statement is true.

Equality is about treating all individuals with respect and recognizing their inherent dignity, freedom, and uniqueness. It means that everyone should have the same opportunities and be treated fairly, regardless of their background, gender, race, religion, or any other personal characteristic. By treating everyone equally, we acknowledge their worth and value as human beings and create a more just and inclusive society.

The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.

Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:

https://brainly.com/question/1172086

#SPJ11

denoting or relating to a person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds with their birth sex.

Answer:

You have to be at least 35 to be able to run for president.

Explanation:

Hope this helps! If it does, please mark me brainliest! Thank you! ;)

As directed by the Constitution, a presidential candidate must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, a resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.

The  General Staff member that  directs all responses and tactical actions to achieve the incident objectives is: A. Operations Division Director.

An operations Division Director can be defined as the person whose duty is to manage the day to day  operation of a business.

The Director of Operations tend to supervise or oversee all the tactical operation of the company in which they  work for  and they as well ensures that the goals and objectives of the company is achieved.

Therefore we can conclude that the correct option is A.

Learn more about Operations Division Director here:https://brainly.com/question/6369558

#SPJ1

Answer:

Sequestering

Explanation:

a practice used during the trial whereby the judge excludes all witnesses from the courtroom except the person testifying.

Out of the group of answer choices provided, it may be said that the size of the jury can be smaller than twelve if both sides make a written agreement regarding the same. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The jury is the most critical body, who are appointed as officials for making a decision in a court case. The size of the jury is important for making a voting, and the majority votes are considered for passing the decision in the court cases. Although the number of members in a jury is set as twelve, it can be lowered, provided there is a written agreement by the parties related thereto.

Learn more about jury here:

https://brainly.com/question/9788151

#SPJ4

Answer:

the answer is a.

Explanation:

cuz you still arent 100 pecent paying attwntion

Answer:

A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person

Explanation:

While under the influence, you're not fully conscious or aware of your surroundings. That being said, driving is a task that acquires the driver to be conscious and to have awareness for their safety and the other driver's safety. If the driver is intoxicated, they risk a collision and killing people if the collison is deadly.

True. Rights that have been established under deeds, wills, and contracts in one state are generally recognized and honored by other states through the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This means that states are required to respect and enforce legal rights and obligations that have been established in other states.

The Full Faith and Credit Clause requires that each state gives "full faith and credit" to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. This means that legal documents, such as deeds, wills, and contracts, that are validly executed and enforceable in one state should be recognized and enforced by other states. However, there are certain exceptions and limitations to this principle. For example, if a provision in a deed, will, or contract violates the public policy of a state or is contrary to its laws, it may not be enforceable in that particular state.

It's important to note that while states generally honor the rights established under such legal documents from other states, the legal processes and procedures for enforcing those rights may differ between states. It may be necessary to go through the appropriate legal channels in the state where enforcement is sought.

Read more about enforcement here:https://brainly.com/question/21082629

#SPJ11

That is correct. Texas law requires voters to present an acceptable form of photo identification before they can cast their ballot.

The list of acceptable IDs includes options such as a Texas driver's license, election identification certificate, personal identification card, or license to carry a handgun. The ID must have the voter's photo, name, and date of birth, and it must have been issued by the state of Texas or another state, or by the federal government.

It is important for voters to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted. If a voter does not have an acceptable ID, they may cast a provisional ballot, which will be counted only if the voter presents a valid ID to the elections office within 72 hours after the election.

Overall, it is important for voters to be aware of the requirements for voting in Texas and to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted.  

Learn more about Texas visit: brainly.com/question/30504811

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it is C

Explanation:

Sorry if I'm wrong-

The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."

Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.

Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

Margaret and Roy have formed a bilateral contract. A bilateral contract is a type of agreement in which both parties make promises to each other.

In this scenario, Margaret promises to give Roy a new iPad, and Roy promises to cut Margaret's grass for a month. Both parties have exchanged promises, creating a mutual obligation to fulfill their respective commitments.

It's worth noting that for a contract to be enforceable, certain elements must be present, such as an offer, acceptance, consideration (something of value exchanged between the parties), and the intention to create a legal relationship. In this case, Margaret's offer of a new iPad, Roy's acceptance by promising to do the chores, and the consideration of Roy's grass-cutting service all suggest the formation of a valid bilateral contract.

However, it's important to recognize that the performance of the contract has not yet begun, as Roy has not yet started cutting Margaret's grass. Until the duties under the contract are performed or unless there are specific provisions for termination or cancellation, both parties are bound by their promises and have an obligation to fulfill their respective parts of the agreement.

Learn more about service here:

https://brainly.com/question/30418810

#SPJ11

Typically, the most important elections on a state's political calendar are the gubernatorial elections, state legislative elections, and midterm elections.

Gubernatorial elections allow voters to choose the chief executive of their state, who wields considerable power and influence over a range of issues, including education, healthcare, economy, and public safety. These elections often attract significant attention, media coverage, and campaign spending, as they shape the political landscape and can have long-lasting impacts on the state's trajectory.

The outcomes of gubernatorial elections can also have broader implications for national politics, as state governors play a crucial role in shaping policy debates and party dynamics at the federal level.

Learn more about elections: https://brainly.com/question/29628143

#SPJ11

Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly.

Contract frustration refers to the breach of contract for non-performance without the fault of either party to the contract.

This implies that the obliging party cannot perform and fulfill the contractual obligations because of the occurrence of a fundamental event, making it impracticable or impossible.

Thus, Carlos is right as the contract was frustrated, not by Carlos or Danesh, but by the failure of the Airline to fly, thereby necessitating the formation of a new contract.

Learn more about the frustration of contracts at https://brainly.com/question/27415360

#SPJ1

Externally, geopolitical conflicts and tensions with other world powers such as China and Russia could pose a significant threat to the United States. The incentives driving this threat include competition for resources, influence and geopolitical dominance.

Changing incentives will require diplomatic efforts, dialogue and cooperation to build mutual trust and find common ground on global issues.

Whereas Internally, the polarization and fragmentation of society can pose a grave threat to the United States. The stimuli that fuel this threat include politics, economic inequality, and identity.

Changing incentives would mean focusing on shared values ​​to foster dialogue, empathy, bridge divides and foster a sense of national unity and social cohesion. 

To learn more about threats faced by U.S:

https://brainly.com/question/22059453

#SPJ4

Yew

Explanation:

Mama joe bamab

Answer:

Making treaties with other countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution.

Explanation:

In the following, Making treaties with foreign countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution. The correct option is (D).

The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches and their respective responsibilities. It also specifies the fundamental legislation of the United States federal government.

It is the oldest written national constitution still in use and has come to represent Western legal precedent.

The states ratified a charter of governance, and it is still regarded as the ultimate law of the land. Both writings have had a significant impact on American history and the global development of democracy.

Therefore, in the following, Making treaties with foreign countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution.

To know more about the Constitution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ5

Financial Incentives, Weak Regulatory Frameworks and Technological Advancements are three factors that comtributes to financial crime.

Three factors that contribute to financial crime are:

Financial Incentives: The potential for financial gain is a significant motivating factor for individuals or organized groups to engage in financial crimes. This can include activities such as fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or insider trading. The allure of illicit profits, whether through theft, manipulation, or illegal transactions, entices individuals to engage in unlawful activities.

Weak Regulatory Frameworks: Inadequate or weak regulatory frameworks create loopholes and opportunities for financial crime. Insufficient oversight, lax enforcement, and gaps in legislation can enable criminals to exploit vulnerabilities in the financial system. This includes inadequate know-your-customer (KYC) procedures, insufficient monitoring of transactions, and limited regulatory supervision, which can facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit financial activities.

Technological Advancements: While technological advancements have brought numerous benefits to the financial industry, they have also opened new avenues for financial crime. The rapid growth of digital transactions, online banking, and cryptocurrencies has created opportunities for cybercrime, identity theft, and hacking. Criminals leverage technology to carry out sophisticated fraud schemes, phishing attacks, and data breaches, exploiting vulnerabilities in systems and networks.

These factors highlight the importance of robust regulations, effective enforcement mechanisms, and technological safeguards to combat financial crime. It requires a comprehensive approach involving collaboration between financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks associated with financial crime and protect the integrity of the financial system.

To know more about Financial crime refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/31388410

#SPJ11

Answer:

I do not understand your question.

Please be more clear on what you want to be answered.

Please and Thank you!

Explanation:

Stephen F. Austin initially sought to secure greater autonomy and rights for the American settlers in Texas within the Mexican government.

However, his views shifted as tensions escalated between the Mexican government and the Texian settlers. The catalyst for his change of mind was the Mexican government's shift towards centralization and the abolition of the Mexican Constitution of 1824, which had granted certain rights and autonomy to the states. This move, coupled with the growing discontent among the Texian settlers over issues such as taxation, representation, and cultural differences, led Austin to support the cause of Texas independence. He believed that separation from Mexico would provide the opportunity to establish a self-governing republic that better aligned with the desires and aspirations of the Texian settlers.

learn more about autonomy here

https://brainly.com/question/17174025

#SPJ11

The General Mining Act of 1872 is a federal law that governs the exploration and mining of minerals on public lands in the United States. However, after a thorough review by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), it was suggested that this act be amended.

The GAO found that the current mining law is outdated and does not provide sufficient protection for the environment or taxpayers. The GAO recommends that the government should consider revising the royalty system to ensure that mining companies pay a fair share of profits and that the government should have more control over mining operations on public lands. The GAO also recommends that the government should improve its oversight of mining operations to ensure that environmental standards are met and that taxpayers are not left with the costs of cleanup and restoration. In conclusion, it is crucial for the government to take action to update the General Mining Act of 1872, and ensure that the mining industry operates in a responsible and sustainable way.

To know more about profits visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29662354

#SPJ11

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The answer is b states could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs

Answer:

D. Adult Judge

Explanation:

A survey conducted by the American Youth Policy Forum(AYPF) in 2004 revealed that Youth courts used an estimate of;

1. 40% of the adult judge model

2. 26% of the peer jury model

2. 17% of the youth judge model

3. 9% of a combination of models

4. 8% of the youth tribunal

We can thus infer that most teen courts use the adult judge as the decision maker.

When juveniles commit offences their cases can be held in a court presided over by peers who are in the same age bracket with them. A youth judge presides over the case most times. A panel or jury made up of other youth judges sometimes numbering up to six deliberate over the matter and make a decision that would be announced to the court. Restorative justice is applied most of the time.

The sentencing administered by the teen court might include sending the offender to a rehabilitation center so that the main factor that caused his or her misbehavior can be corrected.

Answer:

D. Adult Judge

Explanation:

an Adult Judge as the decision-maker.