Lauren is writing a small paragraph on main points of a text which reading phase this represents

Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure.

Recording or documenting evidence as it stands organized is a necessary component of the complaint investigation procedure. In the midst of an intense interview or a complex observation, it exists possible to forget to create adequate notes or overlook recording important information about how the information existed acquired. Such lapses, however, can seriously harm the research because essential facts may be forgotten or overlooked. Inadequate notes can also generate situations should any resulting sanction be appealed.

Interviews – written notes or audio recorded:

Observations:

The certification worker should carefully document where the observation occurs, the start/stop time, the names of persons present and their relationship to the certified program/incident, and a factual narrative or bullet presentation of what is observed. The observation may be signed by the person(s) making them who can testify to the facts.

Affidavits and written statements:

The value of the information obtained is considerably enhanced if a witness or collateral contact is willing to make a written statement of the information furnished. Generally, the statement maker should write the statement, but this is not mandatory. In some cases, the certification worker may write the statement for the person and have every page read by, or read to, and signed and dated by the statement maker. The statement maker’s name, address, telephone number and relationship to the center / incident should be included in the statement.

Photographs:

Photographs exist good, primary evidence, as they demonstrate an objective, factual and objective record. However, they can only document visual compliance or noncompliance with certification needs. They cannot reflect the lack of some activity, object, or person because whatever exists absent could be just outside the camera’s field of vision. Photographs should be labeled with the place, time and date carried and the name(s) of a person who exists able to testify to that evidence. When a photograph lives taken of a child(ren), the confidentiality of the child(ren) shall be maintained. To the extent practicable, avoid photographing faces.

Diagrams / program floor plans:

Sometimes it may be helpful to draw a diagram of the area of objects, program staff, and so forth. This may be particularly helpful when documenting visual barriers, etc. Diagrams should be as near to scale as possible - and should be labeled and dated by the drawer.

Program documents:

The most original document exists always the best evidence to contain. However, the certification worker might have to utilize a photocopy of an original document or simply record information from monitored records. Notes on photocopies or observations should contain information about what the document designates, the date and where it existed collected, and the name of the individual who is able to testify to that evidence.

Records from other Agencies:

During the course of a complaint examination, the certification worker may require to obtain a record(s) from other agencies or offices. When a document exists obtained, it stands best practice if the person providing it proves that the document(s) exists as a true and actual copy. Some agencies or offices, particularly court agencies and law enforcement, have their own certification format.

To learn more about Evidence Recording refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/27346773

#SPJ9

Answer:

This concept is used by European countries.

Explanation:

The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.

Answer: Human trafficing is a harsh this that must be stopped that hurts many people and family as well.But trafficking is a reality in South Africa. ... This means victims are trafficked from here to other countries; foreign victims are moved through the country to other areas for exploitation, while foreign victims are brought to the country as their final destination. It is real and I pray it will be stopped!  

Explanation:The University of Johannesburg reports that trafficking occurs at a slightly higher rate for girls than boys, with 55.5% of all trafficked people in South Africa being female, and 44.5% being male. It is estimated that more than three-quarters of all victims are between the ages of 12–25.

Human trafficking in South Africa occurs as a practice of forced labor and exploitation among exported and imported men, women, and children.

Human trafficking refers to the unlawful act of coercing people so that benefits can be received from their work or service.

Human trafficking in South Africa is a practice of forced labor and exploitation of trafficked men, women, and many children.

Learn more about human trafficking here:

https://brainly.com/question/24024401

#SPJ2

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Yes because being expelled means you've been suspended already and can't go back whereas if you get suspended you can go back and you did something bad but not extremely bad.

Answer:

The colonists had no intention of declaring their independence from England when they signed the Mayflower Compact.

Explanation:

Answer:

1) Protecting basic human rights –Promoting fairness –Helping resolve conflicts –Promoting order and stability.

2) mm with today's society no I dont. I feel like we try to but we don't end up fulfilling the "goal"

Like we try to respect others human rights but we can't do that with people being against ones wishes you know. And some people just want violence so we can't really promote order and stability.

You watched a gentleman approach the counter with a bottle of whiskey. He answered your questions directly and clearly, there was no odor of alcohol in his breath, and his eyes were clear.

In a private club, the owner owns the alcoholic beverages (assuming the owner has a permit to register the private club).

Chronic liver disease and other severe conditions can be brought on by alcohol. Alcohol can bring back memories of traumatic events or emotions. Abuse and dependence on alcohol can occur. Anxiety and depression are exacerbated by alcohol.

To learn more about alcohol here

https://brainly.com/question/4698220

#SPJ1

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 introduced several important provisions to protect workers' rights and regulate employment practices in the United States.

Here are some key things that the FLSA accomplished:Establishing a Federal Minimum Wage: The FLSA established a federal minimum wage, initially set at $0.25 per hour, to ensure that workers receive a fair and reasonable wage for their work. Over time, the minimum wage has been periodically adjusted and increased to keep up with inflation and reflect changing economic conditions.

Setting Standards for Overtime Pay: The FLSA introduced the concept of overtime pay, which requires employers to pay eligible employees at a higher rate for any hours worked beyond the standard 40-hour workweek. The standard rate for overtime pay is typically set at one and a half times the regular hourly rate.

Learn more about  Fair Labor Standards Act here:https://brainly.com/question/16858218

#SPJ11

Answer:

The criminal justice system is a network of government and private agencies intended to manage accused and convicted criminals. The criminal justice system is comprised of multiple interrelated pillars, consisting of academia, law enforcement, forensic services, the judiciary, and corrections.

Hope I helped

Both Louis and Al are engaged in illegal activities and could face criminal charges. Louis may be charged with solicitation of arson and Al may be charged with attempted arson.

Louis's offer to Al to burn down the buildings is illegal and can result in criminal charges for both of them.

Al's attempt to set fire to the buildings is also a criminal offense and can result in charges of arson.

Louis cannot sue Al to recover the $5,000 because their agreement is illegal and against public policy.

If Al suffers any harm or damage as a result of the illegal agreement with Louis, he may not be able to seek legal remedies for those damages.

Louis's refusal to pay Al is not legally justified because he is equally responsible for the illegal agreement.

The fact that the fire department intervened and prevented the buildings from being completely destroyed does not absolve Al of his criminal liability for attempting to commit arson.

Louis's actions have contributed to the ongoing illegal activity of drug dealers and homeless people living in the buildings, and he may be liable for any harm or damages caused by their continued presence.

Louis should take legal measures to properly secure and maintain his properties to prevent unlawful entry and use by others.

Individuals should not take the law into their own hands or engage in illegal activities to address social problems. Instead, they should work with law enforcement and other legal channels to address such issues.

Learn more about intervened here:

https://brainly.com/question/28013399

#SPJ11

Answer:

revising

Explanation:

Answer:

this is a law order given the owner a standing order to forbid others from using the mark in a way that will lessen the beauty or priority.

Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code

Explanation:

I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad  answer lol

Answer: is not legally required to disclose the homicide to the potential buyers.

Explanation:

Homicide simply means when someone is killed by another person. While some homicides are justifiable, others aren't.

If a homicide occurs on a particular property and due to this reason, the property will be sold, it's not legally required for the person selling the house to tell the potential buyers that a homicide occured there.

Therefore, Kelly is not legally required to disclose the homicide to the potential buyers.

The statement that "in the event of a conflict between HIPAA and state law, state law preempts HIPAA unless HIPAA is stricter" is true. However, let us have an in-depth explanation.In the United States, HIPAA and state law regulate the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI).

The privacy regulations apply to most covered entities, which include health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers. However, in certain cases, state law requirements can conflict with HIPAA's requirements.If HIPAA regulations and state law requirements conflict, the requirements of the stricter law will apply.

This indicates that the federal law does not pre-empt the state law when it comes to healthcare privacy laws unless the federal law, HIPAA, has stricter provisions than the state law in question. In other words, if a state law is stricter than HIPAA's regulations, the state law will take precedence and must be followed by healthcare providers.

To know more about PHI visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31930738

#SPJ11

Main answer: According to the Labour Relations Act, disputes of interest should be dealt with through collective bargaining and the process of reaching a collective agreement between the employer and the employee representatives.

Supporting explanation: Under the Labour Relations Act, employees have the right to organize and form trade unions to represent their interests in collective bargaining with their employer. Disputes of interest, which may arise when there is a disagreement between the employer and the employees over working conditions, pay, benefits, or other matters, should be dealt with through this process of collective bargaining.

If the parties are unable to reach a collective agreement through bargaining, they may seek the assistance of a mediator or conciliator to help them resolve the dispute. If mediation or conciliation fails, the parties may engage in a strike or lockout, but only after complying with certain legal requirements and procedures set out in the Labour Relations Act.

Overall, the Labour Relations Act provides a framework for resolving disputes of interest in a way that protects the rights and interests of both employers and employees, and encourages the peaceful and productive resolution of workplace conflicts.

Learn more about the Labour Relations Act at :

brainly.com/question/28900142

#SPJ11

Farm Supplies may be liable for hostile environment harassment if it knew of the harassment and did not take steps to prevent it.

When coworkers, customers, contractors, or anybody else the victim meets with at work behaves in an undesirable way and makes the workplace frightening, aggressive, or insulting, it creates a hostile environment. A hostile workplace claim must often be supported by evidence that you were harassed because of a protected trait. It was inappropriate to be harassed.

The harassment was serious enough or pervasive enough to make the workplace hostile. To determine whether an environment is "hostile," courts must consider the entirety of the circumstances, and they should take into account the non-exclusive list of factors below: (1) the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; (2) its seriousness; and (3) whether it is physically threatening or humiliating.

To learn more about harassment, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15277267

#SPJ1

Option D is true since government-approved hayrides, beach rides, and parades are excluded from the Texas law that forbids riding in a truck's or trailer's bed.

Almost all circumstances in which a vehicle is operated with a minor under the age of 18 in the truck bed or on a trailer are prohibited under Texas law. This rule does not apply in a select few scenarios, including utilizing or towing the vehicle in a parade.

For instance, thousands of lives are rescued annually by safety belts. To ensure that vehicles get to their destinations swiftly and safely, speed limits are in existence. It is dangerously distracting to text or talk on the phone while driving.

To learn more about Texas laws,

https://brainly.com/question/30189852

#SPJ4

Answer: There are several rights assigned with the arrestee or prisoner.

Explanation:

The following are the rights of the prisoner:

1. The statement given by the prisoner cannot be recorded and but can be used to get leads as people under the police pressure make false statements.

2. The prisoner cannot be taken into remand or no physical offense is allowed.

During the exchange for the cooperation the prisoner can expect that there will be no physical violence against him or her during interrogation.

Answer

To control disruptive behaviour.

Explanation:

Although there are several functions of law in society, yet it is to control the disruptive behaviour of individuals. In a society where there is no law, such will be characterised with disorderliness. Law helps to resolve dispute, protects right and freedom, establish rules of conduct, provides a system of enforcement and protect the society at large.

Laws are created in a society to instill discipline on it's citizens and to set out clearly what is right from what is wrong. It also maintains social order, economic and political stability in a society. It maintains social order in the scenes that there is a limit to how individuals must act in relation to one another in any given society.

Other functions of law are that it governs how people behave and then set out how government would deal with such behaviour. Individuals also have power or rights under law hence create a limit to government power which in turn promote peace in a society.

Answer:

Based on the results of the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment, which concluded that arrest was the most effective in most domestic violence cases, the Minneapolis Police Department started requiring police officials to use it as the main approach and to make a report on the reasons not to do it if they fail to do it.

Explanation:

The police policies were changed in March of 1984 and led to a record of people in jail on spouse assault charges.

The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.

Read more about court case here;

https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1

............................

The contracts in scenarios 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 are voidable, void, and voidable respectively.

In scenario 2.1, the contract between John and Andile is voidable. The factor that influences consensus is the false impression that John had about the seller. In scenario 2.2, the contract between Tshidi and Rabelani is void because it was entered into under duress. Kidnapping is illegal and therefore renders the contract invalid. In scenario 2.3, the contract between Maggie and Lelo is voidable. The false information provided by Maggie influenced Lelo's decision to buy the fridge.

Learn more about Contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/34698330

#SPJ2

The Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act is a bill that was signed into law in 2016 by President Barack Obama. This law aims to strike a balance between providing patients with access to necessary medications while also preventing drug abuse and diversion by increasing the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) powers.

The act outlines several changes to current drug control policies, including the following: -

Clarification of the DEA's authority: The law provides clarity to the DEA's authority to issue immediate suspension orders (ISOs) and revocations of registration to practitioners who dispense controlled substances.
- Support for collaboration between DEA and healthcare providers: The law directs the DEA to collaborate with healthcare providers to educate them on their responsibilities for controlled substance prescribing and dispensing.
- Risk-based assessment of controlled substances: The law directs the DEA to use a risk-based approach to assessing the need for and quantity of controlled substances to be manufactured, based on factors such as past abuse, diversion, and public health needs.
- Enhanced communication: The law requires the DEA to communicate with registrants before issuing ISOs or revocations to provide them with an opportunity to respond to allegations.
- Increased transparency: The law requires the DEA to provide greater transparency regarding its administrative process for revocation of registration and to make available certain data related to controlled substances.

Overall, the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act is intended to improve drug control policies and protect public health while also ensuring that patients have access to the medications they need.

To know more about Drug Enforcement Administration visit-

brainly.com/question/4948647

#SPJ11

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

The commercial disparagement is a type of 'tort' in which a person makes some derogatory statement against the business or a person causing them harm. It is also known as business disparagement.

Though it can be hard for the plaintiff to prove commercial disparagement yet certain parameters or prerequisites are laid in the law which can be shown as proof. One of the prerequisites is to show financial loss occurred due to the slander or libel. The plaintiff can show his/her financial losses occurred after the libel is traded in the market.

Therefore, option D is correct.

If the federal government is issuing more block grants than categorical grants, it may indicate a shift towards giving more decision-making power to state and local governments.

Block grants provide recipients with more flexibility in how they use the funds, allowing them to allocate resources according to their specific needs and priorities. This approach is often favored by those who believe that states and localities are better equipped to address the unique challenges facing their communities.

However, critics argue that block grants can lead to less accountability and transparency, as well as disparities in funding levels between different areas. Ultimately, the use of block grants versus categorical grants is a matter of policy preference and political priorities.

Learn more about  block grants:

https://brainly.com/question/15401614

#SPJ11

Answer:

cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.

pros: no prison

Explanation:

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?