Identify two functions of political parties.
why do you think the lawyers for Griffiths Mxenge wanted to cross-examine Dirk Coetzee?
cross-examining Coetzee would have been an important part of Mxenge's legal strategy, as it would have allowed his lawyers to challenge the testimony of a key witness and to shed light on the broader context of apartheid-era abuses. It would have also been a way to hold the perpetrators of these abuses accountable for their actions and to seek justice for their victims.
The lawyers for Griffiths Mxenge likely wanted to cross-examine Dirk Coetzee because he was a former member of the South African Police's notorious Security Branch, which was responsible for many of the human rights abuses committed during the apartheid era.
Coetzee was known to have been involved in numerous acts of violence and torture against anti-apartheid activists, and his testimony could have shed light on the tactics used by the Security Branch to target and intimidate its opponents.
Cross-examining Coetzee would have allowed Mxenge's lawyers to challenge his credibility and to question the veracity of his testimony. They may have sought to expose contradictions or inconsistencies in his testimony, or to challenge his interpretation of events. They may also have sought to elicit information from Coetzee about the broader context of the Security Branch's activities, including its links to other state agencies and its role in the broader system of apartheid repression.
for more such questions on legal strategy
https://brainly.com/question/30690178
#SPJ11
For presidential candidates, a significant advantage in an early primary win in New Hampshire is which of the following?
a. The ability to ignore the rest of the primary election season
b. Being designated as the front-runner, with resulting media exposure
c. The right to speak at the nominating convention of their party
d. A bonus accrual of 10 super delegate votes at the national nominating convention
e. Being named the lead horse, which eliminates other partisan challengers
Answer:
b. Being designated as the front-runner, with resulting media exposure.
diplomat from France who angered President Washington
Answer: Edmond Charles Genet was a French diplomat sent to the United States during George Washington's first term as president in 1792. He planned to have Americans attack the British and Spanish in North America, countries then at war with France.
Hope this helps.
Answer:Edmond Charles Genet I hope this helps
Explanation:
Edmond Charles Genet was a French diplomat sent to the United States during George Washington's first term as president in 1792. He planned to have Americans attack the British and Spanish in North America, countries then at war with France.Edmond Charles Genêt served as French minister to the United States from 1793 to 1794. His activities in that capacity embroiled the United States and France in a diplomatic crisis, as the United States Government attempted to remain neutral in the conflict between Great Britain and Revolutionary France
Which prevailing attitude in the late 1800’s is reflected by the poster published in 1854 about the American Patriot? a. Nativism b. Assimilation c. Manifest destiny d. Suburbanization
The prevailing attitude reflected by this poster in the late 1800's is A) Nativism. The poster's slogan "America for Americans" promotes the attitude of Nativism, which involved promoting the interests of native-born or 'real' Americans over immigrants.
Which are examples of strategies used to win civil rights in the South in the 1960s? Select three options.
organizing sit-ins at lunch counters
marching from one city to another
holding violent protest marches
hosting public gatherings
moving to other parts of the country
jailing white supremacists
WILL GIVE 35 POINTS TO WHOEVER GETS IT CORRECT WITHIN 15 MINS
Answer:
The three examples of strategies used to win civil rights in the South in the 1960s are:
1. Organizing sit-ins at lunch counters
2. Marching from one city to another
3. Hosting public gatherings
Did President Carter's support for human rights serve the international interests of the United States?
Answer:
Carter came to the White House determined to make human rights considerations integral to U.S. foreign policy. ... The Carter administration's human rights record was mixed. The President and his advisers denounced human rights violations by the Soviet Union and its East European allies.
Answer:
He promoted adherence to three human rights categories—the right to be free from government violation of the integrity of the person; the right to fulfill vital needs such as food, shelter, and education; and civil and political rights.Explanation:
What is Auto manufacturer
An auto manufacturer is a company that designs, produces, and sells automobiles to consumers.
What does an auto manufacturer do in the automotive industry?Auto manufacturers play a crucial role in the automotive industry by overseeing the entire process of creating vehicles. They are responsible for designing and engineering automobiles, sourcing and manufacturing various components, assembling the vehicles, and distributing them to dealerships or directly to customers.
Auto manufacturers invest significant resources into research and development to innovate and improve their vehicle models, ensuring they meet safety and environmental standards while also incorporating technological advancements.
Read more about manufacturer
brainly.com/question/13440987
#SPJ1
How can one best account for the relative stability of second-wave civilizations despite the massive social inequalities inherent in these societies?
Answer:
Indus Valley Civilisation
OverviewVideosBooks
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilization
Image result for about Indus Valley Civilizatio
The Indus Valley Civilisation, also known as the Indus Civilisation was a Bronze Age civilisation in the northwestern regions of South Asia, lasting from 3300 BCE to 1300 BCE, and in its mature form 2600 BCE to 1900 BCE
Please Help! The Islamic State was a militant group of
(A) reformers supporting democracy in the Middle East.
(B) Muslims determined to establish sharia law across the Middle East.
(C) radicals pushing for U.S. hate crime legislation.
(D) military leaders in Russia, Iran, and Saudi Arabia
The Islamic State was a militant group of Muslims that was determined to establish sharia law across the Middle East.
What was the Islamic State?These state were the state that have a government based on Islamic law and they are describe by using various historical polities and theories of governance in the Islamic world.
Some typical characteristics of the Islamic state includes the followings:
a Muslim societyuse of Islamic law or Islamic lawpresence of caliphThese characteristics are the prerequisites for the establishment of a legitimate Islamic state.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Islamic state
brainly.com/question/11505530
#SPJ1
Answer:
B) Muslims determined to establish sharia law across the Middle East.
Explanation:
For decades, Israelis and Arabs have fought for Gaza. When Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, the Arab Israeli conflict erupted into the bloodiest and most vicious conflict in history. Several worldwide and intraregional elements intertwined to produce a difficult situation and spark war in 1948, resulting in the war of that same year. Sharia law is viewed favorably by the vast majority of Muslims in the Middle East. When it comes to acknowledging the threat posed by sharia law, the progressive left contradicts logic.
Learn more of the cause-and-effect Islamic State: https://brainly.com/question/18909744
#SPJ1
Read the passage.
excerpt from Queen of the Falls by Chris Van Allsburg
The men rowed away from the island, drawing close to the "Point of No Return," a place where the river ran so quickly on its way to the falls that no boat could escape its pull.
Fred Truesdale tapped on the barrel with his oar and told Annie he was going to cut the rope. Her muffled voice answered back, "All righty." The line was cut and the two boatmen rowed with all their strength, fighting the fierce current that quickly stole the barrel away.
Question
Based on the details in the passage, what can readers infer about the task of placing Annie's barrel in the river?
Responses
It does not happen as planned.
It does not happen as planned.
It is the least risky part of the stunt.
It is the least risky part of the stunt.
It is difficult and dangerous.
It is difficult and dangerous.
It is not something Fred wants to do
Answer:
(If you like this answer i would appreciate if u give brainliest but otherwise, i hope this helped ^^)
Explanation:
Based on the details in the passage, readers can infer that placing Annie's barrel in the river is difficult and dangerous. The passage mentions that the river at the "Point of No Return" runs so quickly towards the falls that no boat could escape its pull. This implies that the current is fierce and poses a significant challenge for the boatmen attempting to place the barrel in the river. Additionally, the boatmen row with all their strength, indicating the physical effort required to overcome the strong current. These details suggest that the task of placing the barrel in the river is not an easy or safe undertaking. Therefore, the correct inference is that it is difficult and dangerous.
Why is it important to maintain a good credit worthiness?
Explanation:
for is important to maintain a good credit because at life u need a credit
7. Would the Civil War have been prevented if Abraham Lincoln had not been elected
as President? Justify your answers.
Abraham Lincoln's election played a role in the events leading to the Civil War it is unlikely that his absence would have entirely prevented the conflict.
Some points to consider to determine Lincoln'sSlavery as the Central Issue: the primary cause of the Civil War was the issue of slavery and its expansion into new territories. Even if Abraham Lincoln had not been elected the fundamental disagreement between the Northern and Southern states on the issue of slavery would have remained.
Political Landscape Abraham Lincoln's election as President in 1860 was a catalyst for the secession of several Southern states. his victory symbolized the growing power of the anti slavery Republican Party, which threatened the Southern way of life and their perceived rights to own slaves. While Lincoln's election played a role in triggering secession, the underlying causes and divisions were already present.
Failed Compromises: Prior to Lincoln's election several compromises had attempted to address the issue of slavery and maintain peace between the Northern and Southern states.
Learn more about Abraham Lincoln at
https://brainly.com/question/856804
#SPJ1
64. Planning for negotiation also involves the development of supporting a. friends O b. point O c. advise O d. arguments
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Planning for negotiation also involves the development of supporting arguments. The correct option is d.
What is the main process of negotiation?Multiple rounds of discussions, proposals, and counteroffers are frequently included in the negotiating process. Making an early offer that fits your desired outcome or could be more advantageous to the company during this time can be advantageous.
Planning for negotiation involves developing arguments that support your position and help you persuade the other party to agree to your terms. These arguments should be based on facts, data, and logic, and should be tailored to the needs and interests of the other party.
In addition to arguments, planning for negotiation may also involve developing strategies, identifying possible outcomes, and anticipating objections and counterarguments. Effective planning can help you achieve your goals in negotiation and build stronger relationships with the other party.
Thus, the ideal selection is option d.
Learn more about Planning here:
https://brainly.com/question/13010835
#SPJ2
Describe how the Spanish-American War intersected with other American expansions to solidify the nation’s new position as an empire
Answer:The Spanish-American War was the first significant international military conflict for the United States since its war against Mexico in 1846
Explanation:
What was the purpose of each of the
Reconstruction Amendments?
The
amendment made slavery
illegal.
The
amendment gave African
American men the right to vote.
The
amendment provided that
African Americans should receive equal protection
under the law.
The United States' 14th Amendment. One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and provide "equal protection of the laws," the Constitution was ratified in 1868 and granted citizenship to all anyone born or naturalized in the United States, including freed slaves.
What did each of the Reconstruction Amendments aim to achieve?What Are the Amendments to Reconstruction? Three amendments to the United States Constitution known as the Reconstruction Amendments, often known as the Civil War Amendments, abolished slavery, gave formerly enslaved people equal rights, and guaranteed the right to vote to individuals of all races. Sep 12, 2022.
Why did African Americans consider the Reconstruction Amendments to be important?Innovative legislation to help lessen the discrimination that many recently freed slaves in the South felt was not forthcoming. The Reconstruction Amendments, however, played a role in ending overt slavery, granting newly freed African Americans citizenship, and establishing the right to vote regardless of race.
To know more about Reconstruction Amendments visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/5498024
#SPJ13
Answer:
thirteenth fifteenth fourteenth
Explanation:
js got it right
Which statement BEST explains the effect of the USA PATRIOT Act?
News sources were censored by the federal government.
Citizens’ privacy was limited by the federal government.
State governments gathered information about citizens.
State governments limited access to public information.
Answer:
The statement that BEST explains the effect of the USA PATRIOT Act is: Citizens’ privacy was limited by the federal government.
The USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act) was passed in the United States in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The act aimed to enhance national security and provide law enforcement agencies with expanded powers to combat terrorism.
One of the significant effects of the USA PATRIOT Act was the expansion of surveillance powers granted to the federal government. It allowed for increased surveillance and monitoring of electronic communications, including phone calls, emails, and internet activity. This expansion of surveillance powers raised concerns about citizens' privacy as their personal information and communication could be accessed and monitored by government agencies without explicit warrants or probable cause.
Therefore, the USA PATRIOT Act primarily limited citizens' privacy by granting broader surveillance powers to the federal government.
Explanation:
Use the excerpt from Kennedy's Berlin speech to answer the question.
How does Kennedy address the claim that communism leads to prosperity?
OA. He refutes it with the example of the United States.
OB. He offers American aid to countries that believe this.
OC. He invites those with this belief to view communism in Berlin.
O D. He concedes that they may have a point, but that communism is evil.
Kennedy proposes the claimants of communism come to Berlin and witness what it has done. Hence, Option (C) is correct.
Kennedy's Berlin speech took place on 26th June 1963. In this speech, he didn't try to challenge communism directly, nor did he try to say that the US was a successful model of anti-communism.
On the contrary, Kennedy invited those who thought that communism leads to prosperity to come to visit Berlin to witness what the Berlin Wall has done, and he said, "Let them come to Berlin."
Thus, Kennedy's address was a direct visualization challenge for the supporters of communism
Learn more about Kennedy's Berlin Speech:
https://brainly.com/question/14619608
#SPJ1
Why was acquiring quam important for the United States in the Spanish American war
Answer:
Acquiring Guam was strategically important for the United States in the Spanish-American War because it served as a crucial coaling station for American ships in the Pacific. Guam's location allowed the United States to establish a stronger military presence in the Pacific and expand its influence in the region. Additionally, the presence of Guam helped the United States to protect its interests in Asia, particularly in trade with China.
Explanation:
acquiring Guam during the Spanish-American War served the United States' strategic, military, economic, and imperialistic interests. It solidified the U.S.The acquisition of Guam was part of the United States' broader expansionist agenda during that era, establishing its position as a global power and shaping its role in the Pacific region.
Acquiring Guam was important for the United States in the Spanish-American War due to several reasons. Firstly, Guam, an island in the Western Pacific, provided the U.S.
Secondly, Guam served as a refueling and resupply station for American naval vessels. The United States was expanding its presence as a global power, and having access to Guam allowed for easier navigation and logistical support for its navy in the Pacific Ocean.
Furthermore, acquiring Guam was also a result of the United States' imperialistic ambitions during that period. The Spanish-American War marked a turning point in American foreign policy, with the U.S. seeking to expand its influence and establish colonies beyond its continental borders.
In addition, Guam provided economic benefits for the United States. The island had valuable natural resources, including fertile land for agriculture and potential mineral deposits. The United States saw Guam as a potential source of economic gain and a gateway for trade in the Pacific region.
for more questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/28806805
#SPJ8
Achievements of the Harappa civilization included all of the following except
Answer:
indoor plumbing
Explanation:
help. Why does the government control prices
Answer:
To avoid inflation or recession
Explanation:
Answer:
Price controls are government-mandated legal minimum or maximum prices set for specified goods. They are usually implemented as a means of direct economic intervention to manage the affordability of certain goods.
Before the civil war , many southerners ?
Answer:
Owned slaves and cotton farms. Although many of them took good care of their slaves, Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote a book about the life of Black slaves in a negative view.
Explanation:
Answer:
owned farms and slaves
Explanation:
3) EXPLAIN the social and economic effects of the Industrial Revolution.
Answer:
As a result of the Industrial Revolution, this allowed for more countries that became industrialized to rely less on slave labor which led to society as a whole shifting to a more abolitionist stance and overall more slaves beeing freed rather than traded. Furthermore, the Industrial Revolution also had more economical effects of being able to increase the production of many goods and items at a rapid rate which allowed for more exports and therefore a boost in the economy.
Explanation:
Why did the farmers at the bottom of the social order build pyramids for the pharaohs, who were at the top of the social order?
Pharaoh
Nobles
Presta
Omdals
8184
Marchants, 80 40
Artisans
11
Farma
Servette
Slaves
А A
They believed their pharaohs were gods.
B
They believed they would be punished if they refused to work
С
They did it as payment to the pharaoh instead of taxes.
D
They wanted to be buried
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Answer:
A. They believed pharaohs were gods
Explanation:
i think that's the answer because I learned this in 6th grade.
The Road to Democracy Essay Questions QUESTION 1: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST Explain to what extent the strong leadership displayed by both the National Party government and the African National Congress during the negotiation process (from 1990) contributed to the first democratic elections in 1994. [50]
The strong leadership displayed by the National Party government and the ANC, along with their commitment to negotiation, compromise, and finding common ground, significantly contributed to the first democratic elections in South Africa in 1994
The role of National Party government and the African National Congress during the negotiation process (fromNational Party Government's Role:
The National Party, led by President F.W. de Klerk, demonstrated strong leadership by initiating significant political reforms that paved the way for democratic transition.
ANC's Role:
The ANC, under the leadership of Nelson Mandela and other prominent figures, displayed strong leadership in engaging in dialogue and negotiation with the government.
Negotiation Process:
The negotiation process itself was marked by strong leadership from both sides. The National Party and the ANC engaged in extensive and often challenging negotiations, with each party having to make concessions and find common ground.
Learn more about National Party government at https://brainly.com/question/19298043
#SPJ1
What was the goal of the Americans' campaign against the Japanese in the Pacific?
a. to capture bases from which to bomb the Japanese home islands
b. to launch a direct land assault on the Japanese home islands
c. to retake control of the Aleutian islands from the Japanese
Answer:
A. to capture bases from which to bomb the Japanese home islands
Explanation:
In a sense, yes, but also no. The answers are half right and half incorrect.
The American's campaign against the Japanese saw a island-hopping strategy, in which the US took over key islands from the Japanese, which either 1) cut off the supply lines to other smaller islands, making the Japanese troops stationed there void and ineffective, or 2) taking islands for their own strategic value. It is important to note that throughout this entire campaign, the only nation that was taken that was not strategic was the Philippines. The only reason why General McArthur "visited" the island was because he promised the people he would be back to liberate them (following the fall of the Philippines).
The strategic value of each island taken typically fell under one of these sectors. 1) The island cuts off other islands, 2) The island has a air field. If the island is close enough or is in the middle of the ocean, it was generally taken, either because it has an airfield already, or has the means in which one can be created on there. Refueling sites & landing strips were then created, so that less planes had to ditch out in sea if they ran out of fuel.
Answer:
A. capture bases from which to bomb the Japanese home islands
Explanation:
I just got it right on the quiz.
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER DOES THIS
Instructions
Think about the Bill of Rights or the first 10 amendments. All these amendments are important, but for this assignment think about which ones you think are the most important and which are less important. There is no right or wrong answer - this is an opinion question. Support your choices.
Bill of Rights
1. Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, Petition the Government.
2. Right to bear arms.
3. No quartering of soldiers in peacetime
4. Right to be secure from searches and seizures.
5. Rights of the accused.
6. Speedy and public trial by jury
7. Jury trial in most civil cases
8. No excessive bail, fines or cruel and unusual punishment
9. The Bill of Rights cannot deny other rights previously held by the people.
10. The states remain in charge within their own borders
Question 1 (15 points)
First choice of your 3 most important amendments and what liberties it protects; ; Justify WHY you selected this amendment.
Question 2 (15 points)
Second choice of your 3 most important amendments and what liberties it protects; ; Justify WHY you selected this amendment.
Question 3 (15 points)
Third choice of your 3 most important amendments and what liberties it protects; ; Justify WHY you selected this amendment.
Question 4 (15 points)
First choice of your 3 less important amendments and what liberties it protects; ; Justify WHY you selected this amendment as less important.
Question 5 (15 points)
Second choice of your 3 less important amendments and what liberties it protects; ; Justify WHY you selected this amendment as less important.
Question 6 (15 points)
Third choice of your 3 less important amendments and what liberties it protects; ; Justify WHY you selected this amendment as less important
Question 7 (10 points):
Explain why the Bill of Rights is important.
Explorers who where hired by the goverment to wage war against local populations where called ?
Answer:
conquistadors
Explanation: in the 16th century they were the Spanish conquerors of Mexico and Peru.
how does The Cold War relate to Kennedy’s Speech Space Race
Answer:
During the Cold War the United States and the Soviet Union engaged a competition to see who had the best technology in space. ... The Space Race was considered important because it showed the world which country had the best science, technology, and economic system.
Explanation:
Article Two of the United States Constitution establishes the executive branch of the federal government. The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the United States, who also acts as head of state and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need arise.
The President of the United States does not have unbridled power. Checks and balances prevent the President from acting as a dictator and from signing executive orders that cannot be challenged. Answer each question below in a well-written paragraph that uses specific examples to support your responses.
1) Explain why these limits to the power of the President might be good for the country.
2) Discuss whether it is in the best interest of the country for the President to be restricted to a maximum of eight years in office. What are the arguments for limiting the number of terms a President can remain in power? What about the arguments against term limits? Do you agree that term limits should exist or not? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
1) The limits to the power of the President are good for the country because they prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual. The system of checks and balances established by the Constitution ensures that no branch of government can become too powerful and that each branch can check the power of the others. For example, Congress has the power to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote, and the Supreme Court can declare executive actions unconstitutional. These checks and balances prevent the President from becoming a dictator and ensure that the government operates within the boundaries of the Constitution. Furthermore, the requirement that the President obtain Senate approval for appointments to high-level positions ensures that the President cannot appoint unqualified or corrupt individuals to positions of power.
2) The argument for limiting the number of terms a President can serve is that it prevents the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual and ensures that power is transferred peacefully from one administration to the next. Term limits prevent a President from becoming too comfortable in office and can encourage fresh ideas and perspectives in the White House. Additionally, term limits ensure that the President remains accountable to the people and cannot use the power of the presidency to entrench themselves in power indefinitely.
The argument against term limits is that they prevent the American people from choosing the person they believe is best suited to lead the country. If a President is doing a good job, why should they be prevented from serving additional terms? Furthermore, term limits can prevent a President from fully implementing their agenda and can prevent continuity in government policies and initiatives.
Personally, I believe that term limits are necessary to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual and to ensure that power is transferred peacefully from one administration to the next. Term limits can also encourage fresh ideas and perspectives in the White House and ensure that the President remains accountable to the people. However, I also recognize that term limits can prevent a popular and effective President from serving additional terms, which is a potential disadvantage of this system. Ultimately, the decision on whether or not to have term limits should be based on a careful consideration of the costs and benefits of this system.
1) Limits to the power of the President are important for the country because they prevent the President from becoming a dictator or from abusing their power.
2) It is in the best interest of the country for the President to be restricted to a maximum of eight years in office.
1. The system of checks and balances ensures that the President's actions are subject to review and challenge by other branches of government. This helps to maintain a balance of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful.
For example, the Supreme Court can declare executive actions unconstitutional, while Congress can override a presidential veto or impeach the President if necessary. Additionally, limits to the President's power help to protect individual rights and liberties by preventing the government from infringing on them.
2. The arguments for limiting the number of terms a President can remain in power are that it prevents the concentration of power in one person for too long, and allows for new ideas and perspectives to be brought to the office.
Additionally, term limits prevent the President from becoming too comfortable or complacent in their position, and ensures that they are accountable to the people. The arguments against term limits are that they prevent experienced and effective Presidents from serving longer, and limit the choices available to voters.
For more such questions on President visit:
https://brainly.com/question/924435
#SPJ8