magnetic field penetration in a plate. the penetration equation may be written as , where lambda is the penetration depth, (a) show that b(x) inside a superconducting plate perpendicular to he axis and of thickness is given by

Step-by-step explanation:

-4=2/3x

-4/1=2/3x

cross multipy,

-4 × 3x = 2 × 1

-12x = 2

x=-2/12

x=-1/6

The space would cost at, $833.34 per month.

:: Total area = 1000 square feet

:: Cost per feet per year = $10

Therefore,

Total cost per year would be, equal to the product of total area and cost per unit area per year.

That is,

Total cost per year = 1000 x $10

That is, $10,000.

Now, we know, there are 12 months in an year.

So, cost per month is, ( total cost per year / 12 )

That is, therefore,

Cost per month = ($10,000 / 12)

Which equals to, $833.34 per month. (rounded off)

So,

The space cost at, $833.34 per month.

Read more about similar problems on division at:

https://brainly.com/question/25109150

The space cost you $833.33. per MONTH

To calculate the monthly cost, we first need to determine the annual cost of the space.

Given that the cost is $10 per square foot per year, we know, there are 12 months in an year and the space is 1,000 square feet, the annual cost of the space would be:

Annual cost = the space  * cost

Annual cost = 1,000 square feet * $10/square foot = $10,000

To convert this to monthly cost, we divide the annual cost by 12 (the number of months in a year):

Monthly cost = $10,000 / 12 = $833.33

Therefore, the monthly cost of the 1,000 square feet of space in the new building would be $833.33.

Learn more about cost at https://brainly.com/question/23412892

#SPJ11

A function assigns the values. The profit-maximizing quantity of labour to hire is 15 workers.

A function assigns the value of each element of one set to the other specific element of another set.

Given the marginal revenue product, MRP = 40-(Q/10)

The cost of labour, WL = 10

The production function, Q = 20 L

For profit maximizing quantity of labour to hire where,

MRP = WL

40-(Q/10) = 10

40-(20L/10)=10

40-2L=10

-2L = 10-40

-2L=-30

L=15

Hence, the profit-maximizing quantity of labour to hire is 15 workers.

Learn more about Function:

https://brainly.com/question/5245372

#SPJ4

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

p + 13 = 17

this is one of my specialty finding the missing number

17 - 13 = 4

p = 4

The Value of the double integral is 9/2.

To Evaluate the double integral ∫∫D x dA, we need to express the region D as a type I or type II region, and then integrate over that region.

For D enclosed by the lines y = x, y = 0, x = 3, we can see that the region is a right triangle with vertices at (0,0), (3,0), and (3,3), so it can be expressed as a type I region with:

a. D = {(x, y) | y ≤ x ≤ 3, 0 ≤ y ≤ x}

or as a type II region with:

b. D = {(x, y) | 0 ≤ y ≤ 3, y ≤ x ≤ 3}

To evaluate the double integral using either of these regions, we can use iterated integrals.

Using a type I region:

∫∫D x dA = ∫0³ ∫y³ x dy dx

= ∫0³ ∫0x x dy dx

= ∫0³ ½x² dx

= 9/2

Using a type II region:

∫∫D x dA = ∫0³ ∫0y y dx dy

= ∫0³ ½y² dy

= 9/2

.

To Learn More About integral

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

The point estimate for the true proportion of defectives from this production line is approximately 0.09 or 9%.

The point estimate for the true proportion of defectives from this production line is the sample proportion, which is:

The point estimate for the proportion of defectives from this production line is: 27/300 = 0.09 or 9%

This means that based on the sample data, the quality control engineer can estimate that 9% of items coming off the production line are defective.

However,

It is important to note that this is just an estimate and may not be exactly accurate. The true proportion of defectives could be higher or lower than 9%.

To improve the accuracy of the estimate, the engineer could increase the sample size.

A larger sample size would provide more data points and reduce the margin of error.

Additionally, the engineer could use statistical methods to calculate a confidence interval for the true proportion of defectives.

This would provide a range of values within which the true proportion is likely to fall with a certain degree of confidence.

Overall,

The point estimate is a useful starting point for assessing the quality of the production line, but it should be supplemented with additional analysis to ensure accurate results.

p-hat = (number of defective items in the sample) / (sample size)

p-hat = 27/300

p-hat ≈ 0.09

For similar question on true proportion :

https://brainly.com/question/29061654

#SPJ11

Answer:

24x + 41

Step-by-step explanation:

Distribute the 6.

6(4x + 5) + 11 = 24x + 30 + 11

Now we just add the 30 and the 11 which are at the back of the expression.

24x + 30 + 11 = 24x + 41

Therefore the answer is 24x + 41. Please mark brainliest if possible and i hope you get a good grade on your homework

Answer:

The Answer Is A. $13,800

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Nothing

Step-by-step explanation:

No expressions were given so I cannot tell the answer. There are therefore no solutions.

Answer:

https://photomath.net/s/1rp76m

Answer: -48x-32

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

cool

what is the question tho

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If a number A is divisible by 7, then it satisfies the following condition

● A = 7k

k is an integer

Let A be the sum of consecutive integers raised to the power of n

● A = a^n + (a+1)^n + (a+2)^n + .....

For this sequence to be divisible by 7 it must satisfy the condition above

A = 7k where k is an integer

Prep time is 12 minutes

prep time is 1/4 of the baking time

p = b/4 where p is the prep time and b is the baking time

12 = b/4

Multiply each side by 4

12*4 = b

48 = b

The baking time is 48 minutes

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x² - 12x + 36 = 0

(x - 6)² = 0

x - 6 = 0

x = 6

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

x² - 12x + 36 = 0

Factor left side.

(x - 6)² = 0

Set factor equal to 0.

x - 6 = 0

x = 6

Answer:

r = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

The zeroes ( where the function intersects the x - axis) are equi-distant from the vertex line of symmetry

vertex 2,4      to  get to  -1 , 0    you have to go three units in the negative x direction .....  the other zero is on the OTHER side of the vertex 3 units which would be    5,0       so   r  = 5

Here is a graph to look at:

Answer:

no because if one of the side is 2, if we calculate semi perimeter it will be 7.5 which is greater

Answer:

The answer is B. y=3x-2

Answer:

i think it may be B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

19.87 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

cross multiply

5/7.8*x/31

31*5=155

7.8*x=7.8x

155/7.8=19.87

x=19.87 ft

Answer:

b = 131

Step-by-step explanation:

The two angles form a straight line so they add to 180 degrees

b+49 = 180

Subtract 49 from each side

b = 180-49

b =131

Answer:

Angle b is 131°

Step-by-step explanation:

Angles on a straight line add up to 180°

To find b add 49 and b and equate it to 180°

That's

b + 49 = 180

b= 180 - 49

b = 131°

Hope this helps you

According to Weber's law, two items must differ in weight by "5 percent"of weight in order to detect a difference.

We are given that Weber's law

For weight discrimination, Weber’s law states that the JND is proportional to the weight of the stimulus.

The JND is defined as the smallest difference between two weights that can be detected by an observer.

The proportionality constant is known as Weber’s fraction and varies depending on the type of stimulus and the sensory modality involved.

For weight discrimination, Weber’s fraction is typically around 2-3%.

This means that two items must differ in weight by approximately 2-3% of their weight in order to detect a difference.

The difference of weight in percent is 5%, the correct option is A.

Learn more about percent here:

https://brainly.com/question/11549320

#SPJ4

To send Kred to a Krew member, you can follow the steps provided by the Kred platform. These steps typically involve accessing your Kred account, selecting the desired recipient, specifying the amount of Kred to send, and confirming the transaction.

Sending Kred to a Krew member usually requires using the features and functionalities provided by the specific Kred platform or service. The process may vary depending on the platform, so it is recommended to refer to the official documentation or guidelines provided by the platform. Typically, you would need to log in to your Kred account, navigate to the appropriate section for sending Kred, select the intended recipient from the list of Krew members, enter the desired amount of Kred to send, review the transaction details, and confirm the transfer. The platform may also offer additional options or settings for customizing the transfer process.

Learn more about Kred Platform here: brainly.com/question/29548334

#SPJ11

Answer:

48in^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a triangle is calculated by the formula A= b*h1/2. Substitute b for 24, h for 4, and solve.

The maximum value of the data in the box-and-whisker plot is 75.

A box-and-whisker plot is a standardized representation of statistical data on a plot using a rectangle drawn to represent the distribution of data under five summaries: “minimum”, first quartile [Q1], median, third quartile [Q3], and “maximum.”

The inside vertical line indicates the median value while the lower and upper quartiles are horizontal lines on either side of the rectangle.

Minimum value = 10
Median = 35

Maximum value = 75

Thus, the maximum value, which shows the end of the line, of the data distribution of this box-and-whisker plot is 75.

Learn more about box-and-whisker plot at https://brainly.com/question/27849170.

#SPJ1

The expressions that simplify to zero are:

8g – 8g

5g + (–5g)

Negative two-thirds g + two-thirds g

Let us consider each of the expressions to determine the ones that simplify to zero (0)

For 8g - 8g

This is a direct subtraction of terms of the same value. Therefore, 8g - 8g = 0

For (–2g) – 2g

This can be further simplified as -2g - 2g = -4g

Therefore, (–2g) – 2g does not simplify to zero

For One-half g + one-half g

This can be written mathematically as:

\(\frac{1}{2}g + \frac{1}{2}g = g\)

Therefore, One-half g + one-half g does not simplify to zero

Negative two-thirds g + two-thirds g

\(-\frac{2}{3}g+ \frac{2}{3}g = 0\)

Therefore, Negative two-thirds g + two-thirds g simplifies to zero

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/25702685

Answer:

A , C , E :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

are u kidding me it's literally D --_--

Step-by-step explanation:

6

6 multiplied by 12 =72

72 multiplied by 2 =144

Answer:

y=55x

given y=385

x=gallons of gas = 385/55 = 7 gallons

inverse function

y=55x

change x to y and y to x

x=55y

y=x/55

inverse function is x/55

Step-by-step explanation:

======================================================

Work Shown:

We use the first term to build to the second term.

Plug in n = 2

f(n) = -4f(n-1) + n

f(2) = -4f(2-1) + 2 ..... n replaced with 2

f(2) = -4f(1) + 2

f(2) = -4*4 + 2 ......... f(1) replaced with 4; since f(1) = 4

f(2) = -16 + 2

f(2) = -14

The second term is -14

------------------

Repeat for n = 3

f(n) = -4f(n-1) + n

f(3) = -4f(3-1) + 3 ..... n replaced with 3

f(3) = -4f(2) + 3

f(3) = -4*(-14) + 3 ......... f(2) replaced with -14

f(3) = 56 + 3

f(3) = 59

The third term is 59

------------------

We keep going until we get to f(5)

Plug in n = 4

f(n) = -4f(n-1) + n

f(4) = -4f(4-1) + 4 ..... n replaced with 4

f(4) = -4f(3) + 4

f(4) = -4*(59) + 4 ......... f(3) replaced with 59

f(4) = -236 + 4

f(4) = -232

The fourth term is -232

------------------

Just one more section

Plug in n = 5

f(n) = -4f(n-1) + n

f(5) = -4f(5-1) + 5 ..... n replaced with 4

f(5) = -4f(4) + 5

f(5) = -4*(-232) + 5 ......... f(4) replaced with -232

f(5) = 928 + 5

f(5) = 933

The fifth term is 933

------------------

As you can see, recursive sequences can get tedious for fairly large values of n. We need to compute every term before f(5) to figure it out. So if your teacher needed you to compute something like f(10), then it would get even worse. Sometimes it's possible to find a closed formula for it, but it may be tricky to find.