marijuana is one of the most effective drugs for relief of severe physical pain; has high potential for abuse. T/F

The views in favor of Republic Act 1425 (also known as the Rizal Law) saw it as a way to promote national identity, patriotism and love of country through the study of the life, works and writings of national hero Jose Rizal.

Proponents believed that learning about Rizal and his ideals would inspire young Filipinos to be patriotic, hard-working and dedicated to their country.

On the other hand, opponents of RA 1425 were concerned that it would promote blind hero worship and stifle critical thinking and intellectual freedom. They argued that the law would impose a particular view of Philippine history and national identity, and that students would be required to accept this view without question.

In today's context, the arguments for and against RA 1425 would still hold relevance. Proponents would still see it as a way to promote national pride and values, while opponents would continue to express concern about limiting critical thinking and intellectual freedom. However, there may be additional arguments that take into account the changes in Philippine society and the education system since the 1950s. For example, proponents may argue that the study of Rizal is even more important in light of the current challenges facing the Philippines, such as corruption, political instability, and inequality. Conversely, opponents may argue that there is now even more need for critical thinking and intellectual freedom, as students need to be equipped to navigate an increasingly complex world.

For such more question on Republic Act

https://brainly.com/question/28666845

#SPJ4

These Federal Protective Service (FPS) reports indicate that people in private security require better training and equipment than they currently receive.

The private security guards will improve their protective security services with increased training on reading and monitoring X-ray and metal detection equipment.

According to available records, the Federal Protective Service is the uniformed security police division of the United States Department of Homeland Security. The FPS prevents, protects, responds to, and recovers from terrorism, criminal acts, and other hazards threatening the U.S. Government's critical infrastructure, services, and the people who provide or receive them.

Thus, the FPS provides essential protective services and reports to improve protective services.

Related link:  https://brainly.com/question/18187050

Answer:

the good leader is who always speaks the trues

Explanation:

There is a unique link between leadership qualities and organizational success. Leadership is the problem of many organizations but little attention is given to leadership-related research. This paper aimed to examine the qualities of a good leader using principal component analysis (PCA). The study adopted a quantitative research approach by eliciting perceptions of respondents on the qualities of a good leader through structured questionnaire. One hundred and fifty (150) questionnaires were administered to top management of companies within the construction industry, banking industry, food industry, and information technology industry. One hundred and twenty-seven (127) were retrieved and considered for further analysis. The data obtained were analyzed using PCA. The findings revealed the principal qualities of a good leader to be: 1) accessibility and dedication, 2) neutrality and modesty, 3) aspiration and attentiveness, 4) believe and aptitude, 5) dignity and amiability, 6) insight and confidence, 7) vitality and concentration, 8) originality and honesty, 9) responsibility and team spirit, 10) decency and self-assurance, 11) charitable, 12) comical and maintenance culture, and 13) reliability. It is recommended that leaders should demonstrate these leadership qualities to enhance organizational effectiveness and efficiency.

Answer: A. Medicare

Example - the anwser is A my human friend

Answer:

It is possible although unlikely due to the fact that blowfly pupae were already found on the body. Pupae generally set in around 18-24 days after death. Possible if there were factors present that increased the rate of decomp drastically

According to the case, the evidence of pupa was he found in the 8 to 12 days. It was the search of the record on the police station of the missing person report.

The term report on the police station on the missing, abusing, and violent and the other cases was the report. It was the formal report on the address the case on the police station. It was at least 24 hours in the day to register the report.

According to the case, pupa was at least 8 to 12 days as the found on the missing person dead body search on location and the inquiry. It was the evidence on the police station as lat two days of the report on the missing person. But, based on arthropod evidence, the man in the derelict building could not be the same man who was described missing.

As a result, the conclusion of the case are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on report, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14969693

#SPJ3

Answer:

It should be B. Get individual states to get along.

Explanation:

The article basically outlines the relationship between the states as well as the relationship between the government and individual states.

The European and Liberian societies greatly benefited from the transatlantic trade in various ways. Europeans experienced economic growth due to increased access to resources, labor, and new markets. The transatlantic trade provided them with raw materials such as sugar, cotton, and tobacco, which were essential for their growing industries. Additionally, European countries expanded their colonial empires, gaining control over territories and populations, which increased their global influence.

The slave trade was another aspect of the transatlantic trade that immensely benefited European countries, as it supplied them with a cheap and abundant labor force. Liberians, on the other hand, benefited from the transatlantic trade through the introduction of new crops, technologies, and cultural exchanges. Europeans brought crops like cassava, maize, and plantains, which became staples in the Liberian diet. The new technologies introduced by Europeans, such as metallurgy and textile production, significantly improved local industries. The cultural exchanges resulting from the transatlantic trade led to the blending of African and European traditions, creating unique art, music, and languages.  Both European and Liberian societies experienced significant benefits from the transatlantic trade, such as economic growth, access to new resources and markets, improved industries, and rich cultural exchanges.

to know about transatlantic trade visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14260809

#SPJ11

General examples of how words can be evaluated to induce different levels of processing.

Shallow level of processing involves processing information based on its surface features, such as its physical appearance, sound, or other sensory attributes. One way to induce shallow processing is to ask participants to evaluate words based on their physical features, such as their font, size, or color. For example, participants may be asked to rate the pleasantness of a word based on its color, such as "red" or "green."

Deep level of processing involves processing information based on its meaning and relevance. One way to induce deep processing is to ask participants to evaluate words based on their semantic or conceptual properties, such as their synonyms, antonyms, or associations. For example, participants may be asked to rate the pleasantness of a word based on its association with a positive or negative concept, such as "joy" or "pain."

Medium level of processing involves processing information based on its more intermediate level features, such as its syntax, morphology, or phonology. One way to induce medium processing is to ask participants to evaluate words based on their grammatical structure, such as their word class or grammatical gender. For example, participants may be asked to rate the pleasantness of a word based on whether it is a noun or a verb, such as "chair" or "run."

To know more about induce click here:

brainly.com/question/14696613

#SPJ4

Corruption refers to the wrongful use of power and position for personal gain. The morally corrupt are those who practice it. The economic impact of corruption is enormous. Corruption is a serious crime that can be attributed to a variety of factors. Morally, corruption can be attributed to a lack of morality. People who lack moral values are more likely to engage in corrupt activities. Corruption can also be attributed to a lack of accountability. When people are not held accountable for their actions, they are more likely to engage in corrupt activities. Corruption can also be attributed to a lack of transparency. When there is no transparency, it is easier for people to engage in corrupt activities without getting caught. From a personal point of view, I believe that corruption is morally wrong. It is a serious crime that harms society as a whole. Corruption can lead to a lack of trust in government, which can lead to social unrest. It can also lead to economic stagnation, as corrupt officials tend to favor their own interests over the interests of the public. From an economic perspective, corruption has a significant impact on the economy. It can lead to reduced economic growth, as resources are diverted away from productive activities. Corruption can also lead to increased income inequality, as corrupt officials tend to favor the wealthy. Corruption also creates a negative environment for foreign investment, as investors are less likely to invest in countries with high levels of corruption. In conclusion, corruption is a serious crime that has significant moral and economic implications. It is important for governments to take strong action to prevent corruption, including implementing strong anti-corruption laws and promoting transparency and accountability. As individuals, we also have a responsibility to act with integrity and to speak out against corruption whenever we see it.

For more question like Corruption visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31859384

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is a.

People help each other.

I hope this is helpful!

Answer:

a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.

Explanation:

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution.

What is judicial review ?

The power of a nation's courts to determine whether the legislative, executive, and administrative departments of government are operating in conformity with the constitution is referred to as judicial review. Any activities that are seen to be against the Constitution are ruled void and invalid. In this sense, the institution of judicial review requires a written constitution.

The conventional use of the term "judicial review" might more accurately be described as "constitutional review" than it currently is because there is a long-standing practice of judicial review of administrative agency actions without requiring either that courts have the authority to declare those actions unconstitutional or that the country have a written constitution.

to learn more about Judicial review click:

https://brainly.com/question/14027482

#SPJ9

Answer: Identification: For access control to be effective, it must provide some way to identify an individual. ...

Authentication: Identification requires authentication. ...

Authorization: The set of actions allowed to a particular identity makes up the meat of authorization.

Explanation:

An interpretive is a rule that does not create any new rights or duties but is merely a detailed statement of an administrative agency's interpretation of existing law.

An agency is a business, organization, or firm which provides a specific service.

An interpretative rule is a document created by the agency to clarify rules it has issued or the intent behind a statute it oversees. In the case of interpretive regulations, the APA permits the agency to forego notice-and-comment procedures.

The proper application of the law is through statutory interpretation. The courts frequently use this method to ascertain the precise legislative purpose.

Therefore, interpretive is the correct answer.

Learn more about Agency, here;

https://brainly.com/question/15129864

#SPJ1

An form of promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be stopped by management.

This refers to the consumption of alcohol in an excessive way that can cause great damage to the person engaged in such reckless and harmful habit.

Despite that promotions are designed to increase brand awareness, create interest, generate sales or create brand loyalty, any form of promotions that encourage the intemperate consumption of alcohol should be stopped by management.

Therefore, the word "stopped" is the correct word.

Read more about intemperate

brainly.com/question/11530556

#SPJ1

A systematic compilation of written law is best described as a code, also known as a legal code.

The process of disguising illegal income to make it appear legitimate is known as "money laundering." Money laundering involves a series of activities that aim to conceal the origin, ownership, or control of illicitly obtained funds. It typically involves three stages: placement, layering, and integration.

Learn more about money laundering.

brainly.com/question/31866889

#SPJ4

Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.

As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.

Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.

The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.

Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ1

A white, transverse line across your lane means: Lane Changing Position Ahead.

When there is a white, transverse line across your lane while driving, it typically indicates that there is a lane changing position ahead. This line serves as a visual guide to inform drivers that they are approaching an area where lanes may merge or split. It alerts drivers to be prepared for potential lane changes and to adjust their position accordingly.

The purpose of this marking is to ensure smooth traffic flow and provide advance warning to drivers, promoting safety and allowing them to navigate the upcoming lane change with caution and awareness. Therefore, a white, transverse line across your lane signifies a lane changing position ahead.

You can learn more about driving at

https://brainly.com/question/1071840

#SPJ11

A white, transverse line across a lane in driving denotes a point you must not cross until you intend to proceed, such as at an intersection, crosswalk, or before a stop sign or traffic light.

In driving rules, a white, transverse line across your lane often signifies the point at which you are officially in the intersection or it may indicate a stop line. The stop line is a thick white line across the road that signals where vehicles must stop at intersections or pedestrian crossings.

For instance, at an intersection or a crosswalk, this is the line you should not cross until you intend to proceed, ensuring to yield to any pedestrians or oncoming traffic. If you're approaching a stop sign or traffic light, your vehicle should come to a complete stop before the stop line, not on or beyond it.

https://brainly.com/question/32337531

#SPJ6

A hearing held in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing in which the juvenile is made aware of his or her rights and is asked to enter a plea to the charges is called arraignment hearing.

An arraignment hearing is typically the first court appearance for a juvenile who has been accused of committing a delinquent act (a crime under juvenile law). At this hearing, the judge will inform the juvenile of the charges against them and explain their rights, such as the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent.

The juvenile will then be asked to enter a plea to the charges. The three possible pleas are guilty, not guilty, and no contest (also known as nolo contendere).

If the juvenile pleads guilty or no contest, the judge may proceed directly to the disposition phase (sentencing), or may set a date for a disposition hearing. If the juvenile pleads not guilty, the case will be set for an adjudication hearing, which is similar to a trial.

It's important to note that in some states, the arraignment hearing may be combined with the adjudication hearing or may not be required at all. Additionally, the procedures and terminology used in juvenile court can vary depending on the jurisdiction.

learn more about Judistriction here:

https://brainly.com/question/12448353?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question

#SPJ11

An arraignment hearing is the proceeding that takes place in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing and at which the juvenile is informed of his or her rights and requested to enter a plea to the charges. The juvenile is told of their rights, such as the right to an attorney, the right to silence, and the right to a fair trial, during the arraignment hearing.

The hearing held in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing in which the juvenile is made aware of his or her rights and is asked to enter a plea to the charges is called an arraignment hearing. During the arraignment hearing, the juvenile is informed of their rights, including the right to an attorney, the right to remain silent, and the right to a fair trial.

learn more about arraignment hearing here

https://brainly.com/question/19363268

#SPJ11

Answer:

judicial branch

Explanation:

Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body.  They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that

Explanation:

In the American government's federal framework, sovereignty is shared between the national and state governments.

This is reflected in the concept of federalism, where powers are divided and allocated between the federal government and the state governments. The national government possesses certain sovereign powers, while the states also retain their own sovereignty within their respective spheres of authority.

This division of power ensures a balance between a strong central government and the autonomy of individual states. Therefore, option (b) "shared between the national and state governments" is the correct answer.

To know more about  American government's
Visit https://brainly.com/question/33521097
#SPJ11

Answer: C.The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people. California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.

Explanation:

The Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) was founded in San Francisco in 1955, as a lesbian organization aimed to help lesbians that suffered discrimination.

On November 22, 2008, Proposition 8 banned same-sex marriage in California.

In 2020, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission defined discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in violation of Title VII and transgender people as a protected class.

C.

1. The Daughters of Bilitis forms to promote awareness of issues affecting gay people.

2. California passes Proposition 8, which makes same-sex marriage illegal in the state.

3. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people are a protected class.

In the Parlato v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States case, the court held that Equitable Life Assurance Society was not liable for negligent hiring. How did Parlato v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States case emerge?Joseph Parlato was a convicted felon who was hired by Equitable Life Assurance Society to sell life insurance.

He was then arrested for embezzlement, which he had committed while working for Equitable. Parlato's victim sued Equitable Life Assurance Society, alleging that the company was responsible for Parlato's actions because it had negligently hired him. The court, on the other hand, held that Equitable Life Assurance Society was not responsible for Parlato's actions because it had no reason to believe he was an embezzler.

The company's hiring process had been proper, and there was no proof that they were aware of his criminal record.The court found in favour of the Equitable Life Assurance Society because they had acted reasonably and prudently in hiring Parlato. The court ruled that the company was not liable for Parlato's embezzlement, which he had carried out independently and without the company's knowledge.

To know more about  Equitable Life Assurance Society refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/25988209#

#SPJ11

The Supreme Court determined that the fourteenth amendment had been broken in the case Hernandez v. Texas.The fourteenth amendment forbids states from enacting or upholding laws that restrict US citizens’ rights or privileges, from seizing someone’s life, liberty,.

All racial and ethnic groups that experienced discrimination were covered by the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court held unanimously in Hernandez v. Texas. As a result, civil rights legislation now apply to Hispanics and all other non-white persons.The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the 1954 case Hernandez v. Texas that farm labourer Pete Hernandez’s murder conviction should be overturned because Mexican Americans were not permitted to serve on either the panel that indicted him or the jury that found him guilty.The Fourteenth Amendment covers other racial groups in communities, in addition to the two classes of white people and people of African descent within a community, if their existence can be proven through factual evidence, the Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.

To know more about Hernandez v. Texas visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29433629

#SPJ4

Answer:

To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.

Explanation:

The force F between two point charges, q1 and q2, separated by a distance r, is calculated by Coulomb's law as F=k|q1q2|r2.

The Coulomb's inverse-square law, sometimes known as      Coulomb's law, is an experimental physical principle that measures the force exerted between two electrically charged particles that are stationary. The electrostatic force is measured in Newtons (N). Electrostatic force equals the absolute value of (charge 1) (charge 2)/ (Coulomb constant) (distance between charges) 2. F = k frac left | q 1 q 2 right | r 2_ F is the electrostatic force (N= kg.m/s2) that exists between two point charges. Common names for the electric force between two charged objects at rest include electrostatic force and Coulomb force. The rule was known earlier, but Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, a French physicist, published it for the first time in 1785, giving it its name.

Know more about Coulomb's law here:

https://brainly.com/question/28040775

#SPJ4

Answer:

I think the answer should be the last one "placing a trade embargo on oil

Explanation:

The reason I believe the answer is number 4 is because a domestic policy affects or applies to people/institutions within a particular country and they tend to be internal and so after using that definition the best-fit answer would be number 4.