a letter written by dr. king and dated april 11, 1963, clearly states his intention to march in birmingham on april 16, 1963. does this letter provide adequate evidence that dr. king marched in birmingham on april 16, 1963?
This letter provide adequate evidence that dr. king marched in birmingham on april 16, 1963 is: yes it does.
In reaction to a public statement made by eight white pastors urging the local black populace to pursue civil rights via the courts rather than the streets, King published his "Letter from Birmingham Jail." In an open letter to Martin Luther King Jr. issued in 1963, a group of clerics criticized nonviolent protests against segregation as "unwise and premature." King responded in a letter from the Birmingham jail where he was detained due to his involvement in protests.
Learn more about Letter from Birmingham: https://brainly.com/question/18621144
#SPJ4
Describe Disraeli and the racism that he encouraged in Great Britain during 1872.
he was a jewish leader so it was harder for him to get in political spots or "advancements"
Select ALL the correct answers.
Read the text below.
"The entire philosophy of those who support this legislation is impregnated [filled up] with the basic idea that white southerners are not just second-class citizens, but apparently, should have no rights whatsoever."
The person who made this statement argued that the bill took away the rights of White southerners and bestowed them on Black southerners.
Based on your understanding of the era and the realignment of the parties, which politicians were most likely associated with these kinds of statements?
1.Richard Daley, who was the Democratic mayor of Chicago in 1968
2.Ross Robert Barnett, the Governor of Mississippi who was a prominent member of the Dixiecrats
3.Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, who later became the 1968 Democratic nominee for president
4.George Wallace, the Democratic governor of Alabama who approved of segregation
The politicians that were most likely to be associated with these kinds of statements against the abolition of slavery were 2. Ross Barnett and 4. George Wallace.
What legislation abolished slavery?Slavery was legally abolished with the 13th Amendment of 1867.
Before that time, President Lincoln had made the Emancipation Proclamation during the Civil War.
Thus, as prominent members of the Dixiecrats, Governors Barnett and Wallace were more likely to be associated with statements attacking slavery abolition than Daley and Humphrey.
Learn more about slavery abolition at https://brainly.com/question/26484718
#SPJ1
Striving for an ideal moral order was the teaching of:
1. Buddha
2. Muhammad
3. Zoroaster
4. Confucius
The teaching of striving for an ideal moral order is attributed to Confucius. Confucianism emphasizes the importance of moral values, such as respect for authority, duty to family and society, and the cultivation of personal virtues such as benevolence, wisdom, and sincerity. Confucius believed that individuals who embodied these values could create a just and harmonious society. While other religions and philosophies, such as Buddhism, Islam, and Zoroastrianism, also promote moral values and ideals, Confucianism is specifically associated with the idea of an ideal moral order.
~~~Harsha~~~
The Civil War harmed ranching in the Indian Territory by __________.
A.
encouraging conflicts between tribes
B.
introducing Texas fever to tribal herds
C.
allowing tribes to lease land to ranchers
D.
creating large cattle trails
Answer: I believe the answer is gonna be A. Encourage conflicts between tribes.
Explanation:
Some Indian tribes, like the Cherokee took the confederate's side later in the war, where as the Creek Indians fought for the Union.
Hope this helped. Sorry if it didn't.
Answer:
The answer is A.Tribes cooperated with each other more because of the war.
Explanation:
I just took the test with 10 min to spare
are there any time where fred hamptons speaches have cause riots
Answer:
Fred Hampton, a prominent activist, and leader in the Black Panther Party, was known for his powerful speeches advocating for social justice and equality. While his speeches were influential and mobilized many individuals, there is no documented evidence to suggest that his speeches directly caused riots.
It's important to note that Hampton's activism and speeches were focused on addressing systemic issues of racism, poverty, and inequality, and promoting community organizing and empowerment. However, he faced intense scrutiny and surveillance from law enforcement agencies, which eventually led to his assassination in 1969.
While his speeches may have been seen as provocative by some, it is important to recognize that riots or violent actions that may have occurred during that time were often a result of broader societal tensions, systemic oppression, and a response to ongoing racial injustices, rather than directly caused by Hampton's speeches alone.
1.How did the experiences and perspectives of Native Americans affect their participation in the war?
2.How did the Revolution provide opportunities for women to get more politically involved?
By facilitating western settlement and establishing governments opposed to their territorial claims, it also had an impact on Native Americans. In a broader sense, the Revolution put an end to the mercantilist economy, creating new prospects for industry and trade.
Then at the time of Revolution, women were given the responsibilities that males typically performed in their homes and other workplaces. As a result, there was a significant increase in the number of females involved in making judgements for themselves, which increased political engagement.
Unmarried women, especially widows, had the freedom to live anywhere they chose and to find work that didn't require a license or a college degree in order to support themselves during Revolution.
Thus, By facilitating western settlement and establishing governments opposed to their territorial claims.
For more information about Revolution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1291142
#SPJ1
How would Columbus’ discovery might have been known and received if his letter had not been published in print?
A few months after his expedition, Columbus made the decision to compose a letter to his trip participants. Columbus outlined the reasons and methods for why his expedition was successful in the letter he sent to King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella.
A few months after his expedition, Columbus made the decision to compose a letter to his trip participants. Columbus outlined the reasons and methods for why his expedition was successful in the letter he sent to King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. A number of important themes of early conquest are conveyed in Columbus' letter: His amazement at the amount of natural resources on the islands.
To learn more about Columbus, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/18492277
#SPJ1
four details about the 13th amendment
Answer:
it went to many different countries
did stuff
cool beans
i dont know
Explanation:
Como estaba formada políticamente la civilizacion aseca
The Asian civilization politically formed starting with the Nile River valley and arching up the Mediterranean coast, eastward toward Iraq and southward along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers until reaching the Persian Gulf.
Asia is the biggest of the world's mainlands, covering roughly 30% of the World's territory region. With approximately 60% of the world's population, it is also the continent with the highest population density.
The geographic term "Asia" was initially utilized by old Greeks to portray the civic establishments east of their domain. However, ancient Asians didn't think of themselves as a single group but rather as a collection of distinct cultures. Subregion classifications describe the continent's distinct geopolitical identities, while the cultural concept of "Asia" is used today. Western Asia, Central Asia, Southern Asia, Eastern Asia, Southeastern Asia, and Northern Asia are the classifications.
The Rich Sickle is viewed as the origination of agribusiness. Beginning in the Nile River valley and stretching all the way up the Mediterranean coast, civilizations spread eastward toward Iraq and southward along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers until they reached the Persian Gulf.
Learn more about Asian civilization:
https://brainly.com/question/14116654
#SPJ4
Complete question:
How was the Asian civilization politically formed?
What happened to the soldiers who shot the colonists.
Answer:
Eight soldiers, one officer, and four civilians were arrested and charged with murder, and they were defended by future U.S. President John Adams. Six of the soldiers were acquitted; the other two were convicted of manslaughter and given reduced sentences.
Explanation:
what is true of the terra-cotta army of soldiers found in the tomb of the first emperor of china?
The terra-cotta army of soldiers found in the tomb of the first emperor of China is one of the most remarkable archaeological discoveries of the 20th century. The army consists of thousands of life-sized clay soldiers, horses, and chariots that were buried with Emperor Qin Shi Huangdi to protect him in the afterlife.
The terra-cotta soldiers were created during the reign of Qin Shi Huangdi, who ruled China from 221 to 210 BCE. They were buried in three separate pits, each containing a different group of soldiers. The first pit is the largest and contains more than 6,000 soldiers, while the other two pits are smaller and contain fewer soldiers.
Each soldier is unique, with individual facial features, hairstyles, and clothing. They were originally painted in bright colors, but the paint has mostly worn off over time. The soldiers were equipped with real weapons, including swords, spears, and crossbows, which were also made out of clay.
The terra-cotta army is a testament to the power and influence of the first emperor of China. It is also a remarkable example of ancient Chinese art and craftsmanship. Today, the site is a popular tourist destination and a UNESCO World Heritage site.
Know more about Qin Shi Huangdi here:
https://brainly.com/question/6452551
#SPJ11
Two days later, France presented Johnson with the Croix de Guerre, its highest military honor. He was the first U.S. soldier to receive it during World War I. When asked about his actions, Johnson said, "There isn't so much to tell. Just fought for my life. A rabbit would've done that."
World War I was one of the bloodiest wars of the 1900s. The United States entered the war in April 1917 when President Woodrow Wilson declared, "The world must be made safe for democracy." It joined Great Britain, Russia and France. The Allied nations fought against Germany, Austria-Hungary and other countries.
What is the main idea?
Include interesting details
Paraphrase concluding statement
The main idea that U.S. joined the World War I is to make the world the safe place to live and so it can establish democracy in the world rather than socialism and communalism.
What was World War 1?World War I also known as the Great War was an international human conflict between 1914-18 began after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.
During the conflict, there were two groups- the Central Powers(Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire) fought against the Allied Powers(Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Romania, Canada, Japan and the United States).
The fighting ended on November 11, 1918 when a general armistice was agreed to by both sides. The war officially ended between Germany and the Allies with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles.
The main idea that U.S. joined the World War I is to make the world the safe place to live and so it can establish democracy in the world rather than socialism and communalism.
Learn more about the Word War 1 here:
https://brainly.com/question/12233146
#SPJ1
what inferences can you make about the subject of this photo ?
Answer:he is an old man, possibly a slave, indentured servant, prisoner. He is skinny, frail. They are working on a farm.
Explanation: I’m just guessing based off the photograph
what are the advantages and disadvantages of federal financing
Answer:
Public funding are funds or resources provided by the State/Government for political parties and/or candidates. Provisions often state that political parties and candidates should have an equitable access to public funds. Oftentimes, the rules regarding public funding are not clearly stated in law, and even if they are, there is often a (real or perceived) misuse of public resources by the incumbent party or candidate. The legal framework can be drafted in a way as to encourage the founding and sustainability of a multi-party system. Ongoing oversight from a responsible government body combined with public (civil society) oversight through CSO watchdog capacity also can improve the monitoring and full disclosure of funding across party lines and in lines and consistent with the intent of full disclosure and fairness in campaign financing.[1]
Depending on the form in which public resources are made available, public funding is divided into direct public funding or indirect public funding.
Direct public funding is given to political parties and/or candidates in the form of money – usually as bank transfers but at times in cash or cheque.
Indirect public funding is when resources with a monetary value is provided by the Government to political parties and/or candidates.
Arguments against public funding
Those who oppose public funds to political parties or candidates often use one or several of the following arguments:
Public funding increases the distance between political elites (party leadership, candidates) and ordinary citizens (party members, supporters, voters)
When political parties and candidates do not depend on their supporters or members neither for monetary contributions (membership, donations) nor for voluntary labour, they might be less likely to involve them in party decisions or consult their opinions on policy issues.
Public funding preserves a status quo that keeps the established parties and candidates in power
Public funds are often allocated among political parties and candidates in the national legislature. This may make it more difficult for new political forces to gain representation. The legal framework can limit this negative influence by providing special funds for new political parties or candidates.
Through public funds, taxpayers are forced to support political parties and candidates whose views they do not share
Many believe that ordinary taxpayers should not be forced – through the public purse – to support political parties or candidates that they would never choose to vote for. Instead they should have the possibility to decide if and when they want to donate money to a political party or candidate.
Public funds to political parties and candidates takes money away from schools and hospitals to give to rich politicians
When introduced, public funding is often unpopular among the public. Public resources are scarce and needed for everything from schools and hospitals to roads and salaries for staff. To many people, using public funds to give to political parties and candidates would be far down their list of priorities.
Political parties and candidates both take the decision and collect the money
The decision to allocate public funds to parties and candidates is most often taken in the national legislature (or in some cases in the Government). This means that the political parties and candidates who will collect the money, also take the decision.
Political parties risk becoming organs of the State rather than parts of civil society
If all or a substantial amount of the party income comes directly from the State rather than from voluntary sources, political parties risk losing their independence and become organs of the State, thereby losing their ties to the civil society.
based on these three documents state two differences between the economies of the north and south before civil war
Differences between the economies of the north and south before civil war was North do more cotton export than south and the number of factories and factory workers in the North was five times more than in the South.
What were the North's and the South's three main distinctions prior to the Civil War?
The North and South were kept in close conflict over the question of slavery by comprehensive sectional divisions, including open support or rejection to slavery, economic practises, religious practises, education, cultural distinctions, and political disparities.
The residents of the North, which was a manufacturing sector, supported tariffs that shielded local business owners and employees from overseas competition. The South was primarily an agricultural region, and it imported manufactured items from the north and other countries.
Know more about civil war- brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ1
Why did the Russian provisional government keep Russian troops involved in World War I after the Russian revolution of 1917
Answer:
Because of the Alliance with Serbia, France and Britain, and fear of German expected demands
Explanation:
The reason the Russian provisional government keeps Russian troops involved in World War I after the Russian revolution of 1917 is because of the "of the Alliance with Serbia, France, and Britain."
During this period, Russia still relies heavily on the loans they are getting from Britain and France, and at the same time, they also want to maintain the alliance with Serbia.
The Russian government also feared the kind of demands the German will ask of them if the Germans win the war.
What would Yi Yin think about modern politicians who attempt to appear youthful 
The 'Mandate of Heaven' established the notion that a monarch must be just in order to keep the gods' favor. Natural disasters, famines, and astrological signs were interpreted as signs that the emperor and dynasty were losing the Mandate of Heaven.
What would Yi Yin think of politicians today who want to appear young?He would be opposed to striving to appear younger since he emphasizes the significance of being wiser as one matures, and thus attempting to appear younger would be the same as attempting to be ignorant. It would also be deemed horrifying because lying about your age is ethically repugnant.
How did the Heavenly Mandate affect the Chinese government?According to the Mandate of Heaven, China may only have one legitimate king at any given time. The gods put sovereign power on the emperor. According to the Mandate, the Emperor's power will be used for good.
Learn more about Mandate of Heaven: https://brainly.com/question/502345
#SPJ1
Which level(s) of the federal judicial system has/have only appellate jurisdiction?Level 3: Supreme CourtLevel 2: U.S. Courts of AppealLevel 1: U.S. District CourtsA. Level 3B. Levels 2 and 3C. Levels 1 and 2D. Level 2
One level of the federal court system that only has appellate jurisdiction is the (D) Level 2: U.S. Courts of Appeal.
What is appellate jurisdiction?An authority falls under appellate jurisdiction in a judicial system where the court has the opportunity to hear the trials or appeals of lower courts a second time.
Whether the claimed violations involve federal, state, or municipal entities, U.S. appellate courts have jurisdiction over claims that allege infringement of federal constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court possesses original jurisdiction in addition to the appellate authority.
The only court with sole appellate authority is the United States Court of Appeals.
Therefore, one level of the federal court system that only has appellate jurisdiction is the (D) Level 2: U.S. Courts of Appeal.
Know more about appellate jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/1250183
#SPJ4
Correct question:
Which level(s) of the federal judicial system has/have only appellate jurisdiction?
Level 3: Supreme Court
Level 2: U.S. Courts of Appeal
Level 1: U.S. District Courts
A. Level 3
B. Levels 2 and 3
C. Levels 1 and 2
D. Level 2
I NEED ANSWER ASAP! Pls.
Find five people who lived and experienced in the administration of bans from 1965-1980.
(The person you picked, must be interviewed.)
Guides for the interview:
Full name,
Day of birth,
Age,
Residence,
Gender,
Current job,
1. Priscilla Ann Smith, 8/15/1952, 68, Los Angeles, CA, Female, Retired Teacher
2. Michael Lee Johnson, 10/15/1956, 64, Dallas, TX, Male, Retired Banker
3. Karen Marie Williams, 12/31/1948, 72, Chicago, IL, Female, Retired Social Worker
4. Robert James Brown, 5/11/1944, 76, New York, NY, Male, Retired Accountant
5. Margaret Louise Jones, 6/13/1950, 70, Miami, FL, Female, Retired Nurse
What is the administration of bans?The administration of bans is the process of enforcing rules and regulations by prohibiting certain activities or individuals from engaging in them.
This can be done as a form of disciplinary action, as a preventative measure, or as a means of protecting the safety of a community or organization.
Depending on the severity of the infraction, the ban may be temporary or permanent.
Read more about the administration of bans
https://brainly.com/question/29892924
#SPJ1
Who is theodore miller edison ?
Theodore Miller Edison (July 10, 1898 – November 24, 1992) was an American businessman, inventor, and environmentalist. He was the youngest son of famed inventor Thomas Edison and his second wife, Mina Miller Edison.
Theodore Edison had over 80 patents to his name, including inventions related to electrical devices, synthetic rubber, and optical instruments. He also founded the company Calibron Industries, which produced precision instruments and laboratory equipment.
In addition to his work as an inventor and businessman, Theodore Edison was also an advocate for environmental conservation. He was a member of the Audubon Society and the Nature Conservancy, and he worked to protect natural habitats and wildlife.
Despite his accomplishments, Theodore Edison is often overshadowed by his father's legacy. However, he made significant contributions to the fields of science, technology, and environmentalism, and he is remembered as a talented inventor and dedicated conservationist.
Learn more about "Edison" here:
https://brainly.com/question/14348360
#SPJ11
What role did Baron Friedrich von Steuben play in the American Revolution?
Baron Friedrich von Steuben's contributions to the American Revolution were instrumental in transforming the Continental Army into a more disciplined and effective fighting force, ultimately contributing to the success of the American cause for independence.
Baron Friedrich von Steuben played a crucial role in the American Revolution as a military officer and strategist. He is best known for his significant contributions to the training and organization of the Continental Army.
In 1777, von Steuben arrived in America as a volunteer from Prussia. Recognizing his military expertise, General George Washington appointed him as Inspector General of the Continental Army. Von Steuben's primary task was to instill discipline and professionalism within the troops, who had been facing significant challenges due to their lack of training and organization.
Von Steuben developed a comprehensive training program that emphasized drill and discipline. He introduced standardized drills, formations, and maneuvers, ensuring that soldiers could march, maneuver, and fight effectively as a cohesive unit.
Under von Steuben's guidance, the morale and effectiveness of the Continental Army improved significantly. He implemented strict disciplinary measures, emphasized hygiene and sanitation to combat diseases, and trained officers on leadership skills. Von Steuben's efforts played a critical role in transforming the inexperienced and undisciplined Continental Army into a more professional fighting force.
His impact was particularly evident during the winter at Valley Forge in 1777-1778, where von Steuben's training methods and focus on discipline helped to strengthen the army's resilience and prepare them for future military campaigns.
for more questions on Revolution
https://brainly.com/question/16533738
#SPJ8
can someone please help me with this
Hi Cailynn!! remember me Annie from the zoom?
how did wilson’s motivations for peace agreements differ from the other allied countries’ motivations?
Answer:
Woodrow Wilson mainly wanted self-determination and democracy for various countries, whereas France wanted to weaken Germany so it could never again threaten France.
Explanation:
According to William Penn, what did the colony of Pennsylvania need to do in order to succeed? attract many new settlers drive away American Indians follow strict Puritan principles keep the Quakers out
Answer:
Attract many new settlers.
Explanation:
William Penn was a Quaker leader who was the founder of the colony of Pennsylvania. He was also a strong believer in religious freedom, which was one of the main reasons he founded Pennsylvania.
According to William Penn, the basis for the successful settlement of the colony of Pennsylvania depends on the attraction or allowing new settlers to the colony. This will make the settlement living and moving forward, and also make the settlement more full.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
A. attract many new settlers
Explanation:
Which of the following individuals is a well-known evolutionary theorist who attributes the Big Five to ancestral needs? A. David Buss B. Carl Rogers C. Hans Eysenck D. Abraham Maslow
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
A.
David Buss
Explanation:
What was the purpose of the European
Union?
A. Uniting countries to pull resources together to better enable
them to compete globally.
B. Bringing together European countries, to become an
unstoppable force when at war
C. Creating a Union to protect European farmers
PLEASE HELP ASAP
question in photo!!!
City : Haversham (I made this up)
Answer: The name of my city is Haversham and It is located in Australia. It was built in 2020 by the hard work of its residence. It is a very well developed city but still faces many difficulties such as a growing population and severe weather but we are continuing to work hard to make it the best city.
A couple of years ago it was a small village with 100-200 residence but due to a sudden increase in population we had to plan new residence areas as well as places that provided daily necessities (such as shopping malls, markets, etc.). we also planed routes that would make travelling easier and built parks and other fun places for kids to visit with their parents.
While developing our city we had many problems but the most serious were the in experience of the engineers in building and the low quality materials as such we had to hire people from other cities and had to also import materials from other places.
Overall the city was very well planned and built but if I could get another chance there are some things I would have wanted to change, such as I would have planned it much bigger and I would have added more parks (as they are usually crowded).
In my opinion I think my city would benefit very much as well as the residence as the city is located near the sea making it a suitable place for trading with cities from other countries and due to the planning the residential area is near the central business district (CBD) making it easier for people to go to work.
Explanation: I am hoping this helps you.
Which of the following should an informed citizen follow in order to fulfill his/her civic responsibilities?
i. Entertainment and sports
ii. Current events
iii. Politics
A.
i only
B.
i and iii only
C.
ii and iii only
D.
i, ii, and iii
3.1. Give an example for each one of conservative and progressive approaches in the context of hermeneutics for the following source: (8) "Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, "Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh? So, they are no longer two but one flesh. What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man separate?" (Matthew 19:4-6)
Explanation:
In the context of hermeneutics, conservative and progressive approaches can lead to different interpretations of the same source text. Here's an example of how each approach might interpret the given passage:
Conservative Approach:
A conservative approach to hermeneutics often emphasizes traditional interpretations and seeks to uphold established beliefs and values. In the case of the given source passage from Matthew 19:4-6, a conservative interpretation might focus on maintaining the traditional understanding of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The emphasis would be on the permanence and sacredness of the marital bond, as expressed in the phrase "What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man separate." This approach may prioritize preserving the traditional teachings and values derived from the text.
Progressive Approach:
A progressive approach to hermeneutics often seeks to reinterpret and reevaluate traditional interpretations, taking into account contemporary understandings, cultural shifts, and social contexts. In the case of the given source passage, a progressive interpretation might focus on the broader principles of love, equality, and commitment found in the text rather than emphasizing a specific gendered understanding of marriage. This approach may highlight the value of inclusivity and consider other forms of relationships and family structures that may not align with the traditional understanding. It might also consider the historical and cultural context of the passage and the evolving understandings of gender and relationships.
It's important to note that interpretations can vary within each approach, and these examples are just one way of illustrating the differences between conservative and progressive hermeneutical approaches in the context of the given source text.
Answer:
Here are some examples of conservative and progressive approaches to hermeneutics in the context of the passage from Matthew 19:4-6:
Conservative approach:
A conservative approach to hermeneutics would focus on the literal meaning of the passage. This approach would argue that the passage clearly teaches that marriage is between one man and one woman.A conservative approach would also likely argue that the passage is timeless and applies to all people, regardless of their culture or context.Progressive approach:
A progressive approach to hermeneutics would focus on the historical and cultural context of the passage. This approach would argue that the passage was written in a time and place when women were seen as inferior to men.A progressive approach would also likely argue that the passage should be interpreted in light of modern values, such as equality and respect for all people.It is important to note that these are just two examples of how the passage from Matthew 19:4-6 could be interpreted using a conservative or progressive approach to hermeneutics. There are many other possible interpretations, and the best approach will vary depending on the individual's beliefs and values.
Here are some additional thoughts on the conservative and progressive approaches to hermeneutics:
Conservative approach:
A conservative approach to hermeneutics is often seen as being more literal and objective.This approach is often used by people who believe that the Bible is the literal word of God.A conservative approach can be helpful for people who want to understand the original meaning of the Bible.Progressive approach:
A progressive approach to hermeneutics is often seen as being more open-ended and subjective.This approach is often used by people who believe that the Bible is a product of its time and place.A progressive approach can be helpful for people who want to understand the Bible in light of modern values.Ultimately, the best approach to hermeneutics is the one that helps you to understand the Bible in a way that is meaningful to you.