MULTIPLE CHOICE1. In 1990, Congress enacted the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. This Act does not:a.encourage the federal agencies to use arbitration.b.authorize federal agencies to use mediation and conciliation.c.require the agencies to use alternative dispute resolution.d.All of the above

Answer:

B. At least once a year

Explanation:

The Model Code of Conduct for Political Parties and Candidates is a collection of rules developed with the agreement of political parties that have agreed to adhere by the ideals inherent in the code, as well as to respect and observe it in its text and spirit.

The Indian Election Commission is a permanent and autonomous organization. It is in charge of holding elections for the Indian Parliament, State Legislatures, President, and Vice President. The Election Commission of India issues rules for holding free and fair elections in India. These recommendations provide political parties and candidates with an outline of what to "do and don't" before and during the election. The Model Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines that must be observed by both candidates and political parties running for office. The Model Code of Behaviour is a collection of standards and instructions for election campaigns, general conduct, and meetings. The Model Code of Conduct stays in force until the elections are concluded.

To know more about the Model Code of Conduct:

https://brainly.com/question/28392010

#SPJ4

Gunshot Residue Test

This test gives the forensic analysists the ability to determine several things. For example, this test does allow them to see if the suspect fired a weapon, was close to a weapon that was fired, and looking at the test results to see the distance from muzzle to target.

I hope this helps! :)

Answer:

She will detain Liam in jail until the trial date

Explanation:

Took the quiz and got it right

There must be two essential elements for there to be a criminal violation, which is activity against the law that can be labeled as criminal and subject to judicial punishment: Hence she detained him and order him to be in Jail till next trial.

On the one hand, there must be criminal intent, which is the desire to commit a crime and the physical activity intended to further that want. For instance, to commit robbery, there must be the desire to steal and a series of mobilizations of physical items intended to further such desire (threats, struggles, etc.).

On the other hand, there must be criminal behavior, which means that the behavior committed with the intent to commit a crime is likely to result in the intended criminal outcome execute the necessary steps to achieve that. For there to be a criminal violation, which is action against the law that can be classified as criminal and susceptible to judicial penalty, there must be two prerequisites:

On the one hand, there needs to be criminal intent, which is the desire to do something wrong and the actual action meant to fulfill that desire.

Learn more about  Criminal Procedure here

https://brainly.com/question/9336457

# SPJ 5

Legalism and Confucianism played a vital role in ancient China's political, economic, and social development. The two schools of thought had different philosophies, which contributed to the country's rise to power after the Warring States Period. They are essential in understanding China's imperial order and its social and political systems during the time.

Both Legalism and Confucianism played a part in the unification of China by providing a unique set of rules for rulers to follow. Legalism offered an authoritarian approach to government, which relied on harsh punishment and strict laws to enforce order. Meanwhile, Confucianism focused on the moral cultivation of individuals and officials to ensure a just society. Hence, the two schools of thought played a critical role in laying the foundation for China's imperial order. However, Confucianism was the primary force in shaping China's imperial order because it became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty. It emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships, which encouraged people to follow a code of ethics based on mutual respect, responsibility, and trust. These principles provided a framework for social, economic, and political interactions between different classes and groups within society.

In conclusion, both Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China collectively move out of the Warring State Period and establish imperial order. Although Legalism provided an authoritarian approach to government, Confucianism became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty and emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships. Confucianism was the main answer to China's imperial order, while Legalism was an essential contributor.

Learn more about the Han Dynasty: https://brainly.com/question/1149953

#SPJ11

Answer: I think its A) keeping a vision of the “big picture” of a project in mind

Explanation: it makes the most sense

One notable example is the implementation of anti-discrimination laws. These laws aim to protect individuals from unfair treatment based on factors such as race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. By establishing legal protections and consequences for discriminatory actions, these laws help foster a more inclusive and equitable society.

Consider a hypothetical scenario where a workplace is plagued by discrimination. Employees of various backgrounds face mistreatment, unequal opportunities, and a hostile work environment. In such a situation, the implementation and enforcement of anti-discrimination laws can play a vital role in promoting harmony and peace.

Firstly, the existence of these laws sends a clear message that discrimination is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. This helps create a cultural shift and raises awareness among both employers and employees about the importance of equal treatment and respect for diversity. It encourages people to challenge their biases and prejudices, leading to a more inclusive and harmonious workplace.

Secondly, anti-discrimination laws provide legal recourse for victims of discrimination. If an employee feels they have been unfairly treated, they can file a complaint or lawsuit based on the violations of these laws. This empowers individuals to seek justice and hold perpetrators accountable. By providing a legal framework for addressing discrimination, these laws help resolve conflicts and restore harmony within the workplace.

Moreover, anti-discrimination laws also have a preventive effect. Knowing that discriminatory behavior can have legal consequences acts as a deterrent. Employers and employees are more likely to comply with the law, fostering an environment where individuals can work together peacefully and without fear of discrimination.

Additionally, anti-discrimination laws can positively impact society beyond the workplace. By promoting equal opportunities and fair treatment, these laws contribute to a more cohesive and integrated society. They help reduce social divisions, promote understanding and empathy among different groups, and create an environment where diversity is celebrated rather than suppressed.

However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of laws in promoting a harmonious and peaceful society depends on their implementation, enforcement, and the broader social context. Legislation alone cannot eliminate discrimination entirely, but it is a crucial tool in creating a legal framework that supports equality and justice.

In conclusion, the implementation of anti-discrimination laws is an example of how the law can contribute to a harmonious and peaceful society. By providing legal protections, recourse for victims, deterrence for perpetrators, and fostering a culture of inclusivity, these laws promote equality, diversity, and ultimately contribute to a more cohesive and peaceful society.

Learn more about anti-discrimination laws

https://brainly.com/question/32410901

#SPJ4

The supreme court’s ruling in the Trans-Missouri freight association case strengthen the federal government’s power it upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads.

The United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), that the Sherman Act, an antitrust law that forbade anticompetitive behaviour in commerce, applied to the railroad sector even though the U.S. Congress had passed a comprehensive set of regulations for that sector.

The Trans-Missouri Freight Association (TMFA), a collection of 18 railroad firms operating west of the Mississippi River, was founded as the defendant to regulate freight schedules and pricing for members. Because these railroad businesses followed the TMFA's defined prices and schedules, the 18 members were able to agree on a standard price for train services.

Learn more about Trans-Missouri here:

https://brainly.com/question/11188979

#SPJ4

Answer:

Depends, you have to give us a table, let me explain how to answer this.

Explanation:

“Inside the nucleus,” because the particle is a proton

For this to be true, it has to have a mass (amu) of 1 and it has to have a positive charge

“Inside the nucleus,” because the particle is a neutron

For this to be true, it has to have a mass (amu) of 1 and it has to have a neutral charge

“Outside the nucleus,” because the particle is a proton

This is instantly wrong because protons are located in the nucleus

“Outside the nucleus,” because the particle is an electron

For this to be true, it has to have a mass (amu) of 1/2000 and it has to have a negative charge

The determination of whether the court will agree with the claimant's allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation would depend on various factors, including the specific details of the case, applicable laws in the jurisdiction, and the interpretation of those laws by the court.

In this situation, the claimant reported the incident internally, alleging sexual harassment. If the court determines that the comment made by the applicant, along with the subsequent exchange between the supervisor and the male subordinate, could be considered sexually harassing, it might be more likely to view the claimant's internal report as a protected activity. However, the court would need to assess the evidence and circumstances to make a final determination.

Regarding the lateral transfer, if the claimant can demonstrate that it was a negative consequence and occurred as a direct response to her complaint, it could potentially support her claim of retaliation. However, it would be essential for the claimant to provide evidence connecting the transfer to the complaint, such as timing or explicit statements from relevant individuals.

Ultimately, whether the court agrees that the actions constituted retaliation will depend on the specific facts of the case, the applicable laws, and the interpretation of those laws by the court. It's advisable for the claimant to consult with an employment attorney who can provide guidance based on the specific jurisdiction and circumstances involved.

Learn more about attorney

https://brainly.com/question/12270776

#SPJ11

Answer:

Introduce yourself to victims by name and title. Briefly explain your role and purpose.

Reassure victims of their safety and your concern by paying close attention to your own words, posture, mannerisms, and tone of voice. Say to victims, “You're safe now” or “I'm here now.” Use body language to show concern, such as nodding your head, using natural eye contact, placing yourself at the victim's level rather than standing over seated victims, keeping an open stance rather than crossing your arms, and speaking in a calm, sympathetic voice.

Ask victims to tell you in just a sentence or two what happened. Ask if they have any physical injuries. Take care of their medical needs first.

Offer to contact a family member, friend, or crisis counselor for victims.

Ensure privacy during your interview. Conduct it in a place where victims feel secure.

Ask simple questions that allow victims to make decisions, assert themselves, and regain control over their lives. Examples: “Would you like anything to drink?”; “May I come inside and talk with you?”; and “How would you like me to address you, Ms. Jones?”

Assure victims of the confidentiality of their comments whenever possible.

Ask victims about any special concerns or needs they may have.

Provide a “safety net” for victims before leaving them. Make telephone calls and pull together personal or professional support for the victims. Give victims a pamphlet listing resources available for help or information. This pamphlet should include contact information for local crisis intervention centers and support groups; the prosecutor's office and the victim-witness assistance office; the State victim compensation/assistance office; and other nationwide services, including toll-free hotlines.

Give victim's—in writing—your name and information on how to reach you. Encourage them to contact you if they have any questions or if you can be of further help.

Explanation:

Answer:

Res judicata

Explanation:

Res judicata is a Latin word which means matter decided. It is a situation in which an apex court has ruled over a case and there is no more room for any appeal or retrial of any form.

The judgement is usually final with both parties having no option than to accept it.

Res judicata is also known as the doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim.

Answer:

Low voter turnout may be caused by disenchantment, indifference, or contentment. Different elections have different voter turnout rates. Presidential elections have a higher voter turnout rate than other elections. Bad weather can also cause low voter turnout. Voter fatigue and the ease of registering to vote can also affect voter turnout.

Explanation:

Answer:

A) Putting national elections in November and State and Local elections in March.

C) Voting for all national candidates once every four years.

D) Making few elected officials responsible for their actions so they can appoint others.

Explanation:

I just took this lesson and these were the answers that were marked correct.

The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.

Read more about court case here;

https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1

No, the set of all sets that do not contain themselves does not contain itself. This is known as Russell's paradox.

The paradox is that if the set of all sets that do not contain themselves contains itself, then it should not contain itself because it is a set that contains itself, which contradicts its definition.

According to Russell's paradox, let R be the set of all sets that do not contain themselves. R is not an element of itself, then it should be in R since R is a set that doesn't contain itself. However, if R is in R, then R must contain itself, which contradicts the definition of R.

Therefore, R is not an element of itself.Russell's paradox is significant because it demonstrated a flaw in the naïve set theory, which assumes that any collection of objects can form a set. Set theory was subsequently revised to avoid this paradox.

The set-theoretic paradox known as Russell's Paradox was first published in 1901 by the British mathematician and philosopher Bertrand Russell. The paradox of Russell demonstrates that every set theory with an unrestricted comprehension principle results in contradictions.

The theory known as Russell's Paradox states: Because it does not contain itself, if you have a list of lists that do not list themselves, that list must list itself. However, it cannot list itself because if it does, it contains itself.

Know more about Russell's Paradox :

https://brainly.com/question/6340818

#SPJ11

Between justification and excuse for a good quarter-century and the scholarly attention has purchased unusually widespread agreement. Justification defenses are said to apply when the actor's conduct was not morally wrongful; excuse defenses lie when the actor did engage in wrongful conduct but is not morally blameworthy.

Answer:

intermingling the principal's funds or property with the agent's own accounts or possessions.

Explanation:

Answer:

12

Explanation:

cuz

A court will only apply a subjective standard if evaluating the work involves feelings, taste, or judgment and the contract expressly calls for personal satisfaction.

To learn more about personal satisfaction clause refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14217410

#SPJ4

1. The employer took the correct steps in terminating the medical assistant as part of the disciplinary measures.

2. The medical assistant lacks the right to fight the termination of her employment because the due process (verbal warning, correction action plan, including mandatory training) was observed.

3. Based on the steps taken, one cannot require the employer to re-assign the medical assistant to other tasks because they also involve documentation.

A medical assistant works along with the physicians.

Some tasks performed by medical assistants include:

Thus, it appears that the medical assistant was not cut out for the job at this period.

Learn more about the tasks of medical assistants at https://brainly.com/question/25964907

#SPJ1

There are a total of 7 reserve components in the Armed Forces of the United States. These components are the Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Coast Guard Reserve, Army National Guard, and Air National Guard. So the right option is (c) 7.

These reserve components are made up of individuals who serve part-time while still maintaining civilian careers or pursuing education.

The role of the reserve components is to provide a vital support system for active-duty personnel during times of conflict or national emergency. They are often called upon to supplement the active-duty forces and provide additional manpower and resources to accomplish the mission.

The reserve components also play a crucial role in disaster response and humanitarian aid efforts both domestically and abroad. They are often the first responders to natural disasters and other emergencies, providing relief and assistance to affected communities.

Overall, the reserve components serve as a critical component of the United States military, ensuring that our nation is always prepared to defend itself and support its citizens in times of need.

For more questions on: Marine Corps

https://brainly.com/question/31755356

#SPJ11

Answer:

The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.

The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its​ uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,

Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.

Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments,  observation etc.

In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its​ uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.

Read more about Science

brainly.com/question/17216882

Yes, because congress is in place to make laws in the best interest of the people.

If A tells B the truth, B will suffer. Mr. B won't come clean since he thinks it won't affect his career. Here, use "act utilitarianism." According to this idea, an activity is morally praiseworthy if it brings others satisfaction. Mr. A shouldn't disclose the truth since it won't please Mr. B.

This is further explained below.

Generally, Both Mr. A and Mr. B opted to join the police force. One day, the cops raided their room and found what they believed to be marijuana. When their case went to trial, the judge tossed out the accusations against them. After waiting for a while, they both apply for jobs at the police department. Mr. A is now faced with a difficult moral choice: whether or not to reveal the details of their arrest.

The solution to this moral conundrum seems to be telling the truth throughout the recruiting process, at least according to the norms of ethics and moral considerations. The rule of relativism states that moral ideals are less important than the environment in which they are enacted.

In conclusion, There will be consequences for Mr. B if Mr. A tells the truth to his buddy. Mr. B is unwilling to come clean because he believes it will not have any significant effect on his professional standing. The principle of "act utilitarianism" must be used here. According to this theory, an action is ethically commendable only if it results in a great deal of happiness for other people. So, because telling the truth won't make Mr. B happy, Mr. A shouldn't do it.

Read more about the ethical system

https://brainly.com/question/13300835

#SPJ1