n
American Indians were expert fur
American Indians traded furs with white traders in exchange for metal tools, firearms, and
, which greatly reduced
One of the negative results of the spread of the fur trade was
American Indian populations along the Northwest coast.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Militarism is when the government extensively promotes and develops the country's military for aggressive use against any enemies. In such a society, the military plays a central role in the government, if not the predominant role

Answer: Countries built large armies and stockpiled powerful weapons.

Answer:

European nations joined the League of Nations.

Explanation:

Answer:

Skin the outside of the apple

Explanation:

Answer:

Pretty self expantiory  

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Dred Scott was Dr. John Emerson’s slave, and traveled with him to Illinois, the Wisconsin Territory, Louisiana, Missouri, and more.

The sentence that best describes the difference between the statements is: they use different sources of evidence. The Option C.

In the given options, the statement that they use different sources of evidence accurately captures the distinction between the statements. This suggests that the information or data supporting each statement is derived from different sources or references.

It implies that the evidence used to support one statement may not be applicable to the other potentially leading to different conclusions. By relying on different sources of evidence, the statements may present distinct perspectives or arguments on the given topic.

Read more about statements

brainly.com/question/27839142

#SPJ1

Answer: He wanted to convince Americans that war was the only way to deal with Japan.

Explanation:

President Roosevelt is using strong language here because he wants to convince Americans that there was no other way to deal with Japanese aggression than to go to war with them.

He implied that peaceful negotiations could no longer occur on account of the Japanese having attacked the United States on Sunday, December 7, 1941, by bombing Pearl Harbor in Hawaii and killing both military and civilians and that war was the only way to reply such aggression.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

Button Gwinnett and George Walton

Explanation:

Just took the test

Answer:

C E

Explanation:

Answer: The Old and New Testament

Explanation: The Old Testament includes the 24 books of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament is the second division written in the Koine Greek language

Answer:the Old Testament and the New Testament I hope this helpful mark me brainlist if correct then if wrong

Explanation:

The Christian Bible has two sections, the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament is the original Hebrew Bible, the sacred scriptures of the Jewish faith, written at different times between about 1200 and 165 BC. The New Testament books were written by Christians in the first century ADThe Christian Bible consists of the Old Testament and the New Testament. In the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox traditions, the Old Testament includes writings considered apocryphal by Protestants.The Bible is divided into two major divisions: The Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament consists of thirty-nine books and the New Testament is made up of twenty-seven books, a total of sixty-six books all together

Answer: Answer:B. That the interests of white Americans are more important than the

interests of minorities

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

strictnjcfk Lal jhddgsdkkdshkds

Answer:

A

Explanation:

He was a liberal constructionist,  Liberal constructionism was linked to a strong National Government. Implied powers are those reasonably deduced from the expressed powers.

Answer:

The underlying cause of confusion was simply that the United States had no time standard. Each town or city would keep its own solar time, setting clocks so noon was when the sun was directly overhead. ... So it's fair to say the American railroads changed the way the entire planet told time.

Answer:

Jamestown was the first permanent English settlement in what is now the United States. It was founded in 1607 by the Virginia Company, a group of English investors who hoped to establish colonies in the New World and make a profit through trade and the sale of natural resources. The settlement was significant because it established English presence in the New World and laid the foundation for the eventual creation of the United States.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

having 3 branches of government

Answer: I hope this helps you out

Explanation:

Sure, two examples of drainage features in East Africa are:

1. The Nile River: This is the longest river in the world and originates in Uganda before flowing through several other East African countries such as South Sudan, Sudan, and Egypt before draining into the Mediterranean Sea.

2. The Great Rift Valley: This is a geological feature that runs through East Africa and includes several lakes such as Lake Victoria, Lake Tanganyika, and Lake Malawi, among others. These lakes are all part of the East African Rift System and are important drainage features in the region.

Answer:

Shipbuilders

Explanation:

Answer:

Mathematicians

Explanation:

The Greeks were widely known for their introduction of complex mathematics to our civilization. You can thank them for the frustrating algebra and geometry schoolwork you have now.

Answer:

the ratication of what?? like it depends on which one you mean

Explanation:

Answer:

yes I love filipinos because my dad is a philippines

Answer:

Jefferson believed that this rights are the right  to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Centuries later they are the foundation of American society. On the other side I don't believe that Jefferson believed in equality as he was holding slaves himself, thus showing that he don't believe in that idea truly.

Explanation:

Jefferson was obviously really affected by Locke's idea, as he incorporated many of those ideas in the Declaration of Independence. Actually, right to life and liberty are ideas proclaimed by Locke, while Jefferson added a part about pursuit of happiness. We can't say that Jefferson really believed in the equality of all people, as he owned plantation in which hundreds of slaves worked.

1. Life for Mongol people during the period when Genghis Khan was born was characterized by a nomadic and tribal lifestyle. They relied on herding livestock for sustenance, and their society was organized into clans. Mongols were skilled horsemen and skilled in warfare, engaging in conflicts and raids with neighboring tribes.

2. Temüjin, who later became known as Genghis Khan, was an influential Mongol leader. He united the various Mongol tribes and clans under his leadership, establishing a centralized authority. Temüjin's importance lies in his ability to consolidate power and lay the foundation for the Mongol Empire.

3. Temüjin demonstrated his skills as a warrior and strategist in multiple ways. Firstly, he employed innovative military tactics, such as using a highly mobile cavalry and incorporating archery into warfare. Secondly, he was adept at forming alliances and diplomatic maneuvers to strengthen his position and gain support from neighboring tribes.

4. Genghis Khan built the Mongol Empire through a combination of military conquests and diplomatic strategies. He waged numerous successful campaigns, expanding Mongol territories across Asia and Europe. Genghis Khan also implemented administrative and organizational reforms, establishing efficient systems for governance and communication within the empire.

5. Kublai Khan was the grandson of Genghis Khan and the fifth Great Khan of the Mongol Empire. He is notable for founding the Yuan Dynasty in China and becoming its first emperor.

6. Kublai Khan's rule differed from Genghis Khan's in several ways. Unlike his grandfather, Kublai Khan focused more on governing and administration rather than military expansion. He adopted Chinese cultural practices, established a capital in China, and fostered trade and cultural exchange between the Mongols and other civilizations.

Argumentative Paragraph:

Genghis Khan was more influential to the Mongol Empire than Kublai Khan. Firstly, Genghis Khan was the founder of the empire and laid the groundwork for its expansion through his military conquests and innovative tactics. He united the Mongol tribes, established a centralized authority, and implemented administrative reforms that shaped the empire's structure. Furthermore, Genghis Khan's leadership style and strategic vision were crucial in building the Mongol Empire. In contrast, while Kublai Khan was a significant figure, his rule focused more on governance and consolidation rather than extensive territorial expansion. Kublai Khan's adoption of Chinese culture and emphasis on administration shifted the empire's trajectory, but it was Genghis Khan's initial conquests and organizational strategies that formed the foundation of the Mongol Empire's power and influence.

For more such question on Mongols

https://brainly.com/question/28884380

#SPJ8

Feudalism and manorialism were the most resistant to change following the crises of the fourteenth century.

Learn more about Feudalism and manorialism at: https://brainly.com/question/13948873

#SPJ4

Answer:

In the case of normal goods, income and demand are directly related, meaning that an increase in income will cause demand to rise and a decrease in income causes demand to fall. For example, for most people, consumer durables, technology products and leisure services are normal goods.

Explanation:

Answer:

In bold are answers:)

Explanation:

Ashcroft told ABC News on September 15th that "investigators believed that each of the commandeered planes had been hijacked by groups of three to six men armed with box cutters and plastic knives." Donald Rumsfeld told Fox News on September 16th, that the hijackers used weapons that are distinctively different such as plastic

According to Reagan's model for supply-side economics, the answer that best aligns with his principles and beliefs would be option D: Tax cuts would stimulate business growth, which would grow the economy and benefit everyone, including average Americans.

Reagan's supply-side economics, often referred to as Reaganomics, emphasized the idea that reducing tax rates and regulations would incentivize businesses to invest, expand, and hire more workers. The belief was that lower taxes would leave more money in the hands of businesses and individuals, encouraging them to spend, save, and invest, which would ultimately lead to economic growth.

Reagan argued that by reducing the tax burden on businesses, they would have more capital available to invest in new ventures, research and development, and job creation. This, in turn, would lead to increased productivity and economic expansion. As businesses grow, they would require more employees, leading to job opportunities for average Americans.

The underlying assumption behind Reaganomics was that the benefits of tax cuts and increased economic growth would trickle down to all levels of society. The idea was that as businesses flourished and generated more revenue, they would pass on some of those benefits to workers in the form of higher wages and increased employment opportunities.

In summary, according to Reagan's model for supply-side economics, tax cuts would stimulate business growth, leading to economic expansion and potential benefits for average Americans through increased job opportunities and potentially higher wages. Therefore, the correct option is D.

The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:

According to Reagan’s model for supply-side economics, how would average Americans be affected?

A. Tax increases for business owners would reduce the income of the wealthy, so the average person would have more.

B. Tax cuts would mean that businesses would become more efficient and workers would lose their jobs.

C. Tax increases would mean that businesses would have less wealth and would produce less for consumers.

D. Tax cuts would stimulate business growth, which would grow the economy and benefit everyone.

Know more about Reaganomics here:

https://brainly.com/question/12281246

#SPJ8

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

because it was so good

Answer:

Expert-Verified Answer

No one rated this answer yet — why not be the first?

tiwariakdi

Ambitious

2.8K answers

536.4K people helped

In the New World, there were two differences between the English and the French:

Patterns of settlement: The English settled primarily along the coast, while the French established settlements along rivers and trading posts.

Relationships with Indigenous Peoples: The English frequently attempted to displace and conquer Indigenous peoples, whereas the French formed alliances and established trading partnerships with them.

Unlike the French and Dutch, who coexisted peacefully with the native Americans by trading furs with them, the English sought to populate their North American colonies. This entailed driving the indigenous peoples off their land.

For example, autocratic sovereigns ruled over France and Spain, and their colonists went to America as servants of the Crown. English colonists, on the other hand, had far more freedom and could govern themselves as long as they followed English law and remained loyal to the king.

One fundamental difference between French and English attitudes toward the land they acquired in North America was that the French were less interested in occupying territories and more interested in profiting from the land.

Answer:

1. The Finnish language is not considered endangered or slightly endangered. It is actually considered a stable and thriving language with a significant number of speakers. Finnish is the official language of Finland and has official minority language status in Sweden. It is spoken by the majority of the population in Finland and is also spoken by Finnish diaspora communities around the world.

However, it is worth noting that there are certain factors that have led to concerns about the Finnish language in specific contexts:

Language Shift: In some regions or communities within Finland, there has been a gradual shift towards using more Swedish or English due to various reasons such as urbanization, globalization, or migration. This shift can lead to concerns about the potential decline in the use of Finnish in those specific areas.

Influence of English: English has become a dominant global language, and its influence can be seen in various aspects of modern life, including media, technology, and business. There are concerns that the increasing use of English may impact the vitality and usage of Finnish, especially among younger generations.

Migration and Language Diversity: Finland has experienced an increase in immigration in recent years, resulting in greater linguistic diversity within the country. While this diversity enriches the cultural fabric of Finland, it can also present challenges in maintaining and promoting the use of Finnish as the primary language.

While Finnish is not considered endangered overall, efforts are made to promote and preserve the language, such as language education policies, language revitalization initiatives, and the use of Finnish as the medium of instruction in schools and government institutions. These measures aim to ensure the continued vitality and relevance of the Finnish language in a changing linguistic landscape.\

2.

Winston Churchill (1874-1965) was a prominent British statesman, politician, and writer who played a crucial role in British and world history, particularly during World War II. He served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1940 to 1945 and again from 1951 to 1955. Churchill is widely regarded as one of the greatest wartime leaders and orators of the 20th century.

Churchill's leadership during World War II was instrumental in rallying the British people and inspiring resistance against Nazi Germany. He delivered powerful speeches that boosted morale and determination in the face of adversity, famously declaring, "We shall never surrender." His strong leadership and unwavering resolve were pivotal in the British defense against German aggression.

Beyond his wartime role, Churchill had a long and illustrious political career. He held various government positions, including First Lord of the Admiralty, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Home Secretary. Churchill was also an accomplished writer and won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1953 for his historical and biographical works.

Winston Churchill's legacy extends beyond his political achievements. His speeches and writings continue to inspire people, and his leadership during a critical time in history has earned him a place among the most influential figures of the 20th century.

With the rise of the market economy in the early 19th century, much of men's work moved outside the home, and women's domestic work became less visible due to the increased perception that only compensated labor had value.

As men increasingly entered the workforce and were paid for their labor outside the home, there was a growing perception that work that was not compensated had little or no value. This included domestic work traditionally performed by women, such as cooking, cleaning, and child-rearing. As a result, women's domestic work became less visible and was often devalued.

Although the increased availability of kitchen appliances and other household technologies may have made some aspects of domestic work easier, this did not necessarily translate into a reduction in the overall amount of work that women were expected to do. Additionally, women's increased political responsibilities did not necessarily lead to a decrease in their domestic responsibilities, as these two spheres of life were often considered separate and distinct. Finally, while household work was often shared by everyone who lived in the household, the burden of this work typically fell disproportionately on women, regardless of whether or not they were employed outside the home.

The statement that best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is Option A, The federal government did not have enough power to enforce its laws, so the Constitution gave the federal government more power than the states.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government had limited powers, making it weak and ineffective. It lacked the authority to enforce its laws and policies effectively, leading to challenges in governance and maintaining order. The Constitution aimed to address this weakness by granting more power to the federal government.

The Constitution established a stronger central government with increased authority and the ability to enforce its laws. It created a system of checks and balances, separating powers among the three branches of government—legislative, executive, and judicial—to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful. This framework allowed for a more efficient and effective federal government.

Additionally, the Constitution granted the federal government specific powers, such as the power to levy taxes, regulate interstate commerce, and maintain a standing army. These powers strengthened the federal government's ability to govern and enforce laws uniformly throughout the country.

By granting more power to the federal government, the Constitution aimed to overcome the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, providing a stronger foundation for governance and ensuring a more stable and functional system of government in the United States.

Know more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/28442712

#SPJ8

The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:

Which statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation?

A. The federal government did not have enough power to enforce its laws, so the Constitution gave the federal government more power than the states.

B. The federal government was inefficient because its power was divided into three branches, so the Constitution created a single federal government office led by the president.

C. State militaries were more powerful than the federal army, so the Constitution required each state to send a percentage of its population to defend the country.

D. States were able to make individual trade agreements with foreign countries, so the Constitution made it illegal for a state representative to meet with a foreign diplomat.