Need some help on this question

Answer:

p < 0.24

Step-by-step explanation:

If earning is 24% less Than predicted, this means that the we can represent the predicted earning with a variable, p

If the predicted earning = p

Then, the actual earning can be represented by the inequality ; p < 24%

p < 0.24

The given statement "The classical model of decision making assumes that managers have all of the information they need in order to make the optimum decision." is false because it is not necessary that they have all information.

The classical decision-making model assumes that managers have access to all the relevant information, but it does not necessarily assume that they have all the information they need to make the optimum decision.

The model also assumes that the decision-maker is rational and logical, able to identify and evaluate all alternatives and select the best one based on a careful analysis of the pros and cons of each option. However, in practice, managers may not have access to all the information they need, or they may be influenced by biases or external pressures that can lead to suboptimal decision-making.

To know more about classical model here

https://brainly.com/question/31246149

#SPJ4

Answer:

75 dollars.

Step-by-step explanation:

Each person costs 25 dollars and p=3 we just put this into a equation.

25 × 3 = 75

C = 75

The magnitude of his displacement is 77.221952836296 m

In this question,

A baseball player hits a triple and ends up on third base.

A baseball "diamond" is a square, each side of length 25.740650945432 m, with home plate and the three bases on the four corners.

We need find the the magnitude of his displacement.

The magnitude of his displacement is the distance from home plate to the third base.

the distance from home plate to the third base is

= 3 × 25.740650945432

= 77.221952836296 m

Therefore, the magnitude of his displacement is 77.221952836296 m

Learn more about the displacement here:

https://brainly.com/question/4801377

#SPJ4

Total distance travelled by lisa before falling off is 56.52 m

The circumference of a circle is the straight-line distance around it. In other words, if you open a circle and draw a straight line, the length of that line will be the perimeter. The perimeter is the total distance around the circle. Then find the perimeter using the formula C = 2πr.

Given,

Unicycle wheel diameter = 0.6 m

Unicycle wheel radius = 0.3 m

Number of revolutions before falling = 32

Circumference (C) = 2 x Pi x Radius

= 2 × π × r

= 2 × 3.14 × 0.3

= 1.884 m

Distance travelled by lisa = 30 × 1.884

= 56.52 m

To know more about circumference of circle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17009295

#SPJ4

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

2x times x = 2x²

2x times -6 = -12x

1 times x = x

1 times -6 = -6

= 2x² - 12x + x - 6

= 2x² - 11x -6

The area of the shaded region is 200. 96 square units

From the diagram shown, we have that the shape of the shaded area is spherical.

Now, the formula for calculating the area of a sphere is expressed as;

A = 4πr²

Such that the parameters of the formula are expressed as;

Substitute the values, we have;

Area = 4 × 3.14 × 4²

Find the squares, we have;

Area = 4 × 3.14 ×16

Multiply the values, we have;

Area = 200. 96 square units

Learn more about area at: https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

A LOD score is the ratio of probabilities that two genes are linked to the probability that they are not linked, expressed as a log10. This measure is commonly used in linkage analysis, a statistical method used to determine whether genes are located on the same chromosome and thus tend to be inherited together.

In linkage analysis, the LOD score is used to determine the likelihood that two genes are linked, based on the observation of familial inheritance patterns. A LOD score of 3 or higher is generally considered to be strong evidence for linkage, indicating that the likelihood of observing the observed inheritance pattern by chance is less than 1 in 1000.

The LOD score is also used to estimate the distance between two linked genes, with higher LOD scores indicating that the two genes are closer together on the chromosome. In general, the LOD score is a useful tool for identifying genetic loci that contribute to complex diseases or traits.

To know more about chromosome visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30077641

#SPJ11

x = -1/3

Explanation:

-3x-2=-1

collect like terms by adding +2 to both sides:

-3x -2 + 2 = -1 + 2

-3x = 1

Divide both sides by the coefficient of x:

coefficient of x = -3

-3x/-3 = 1/-3

x = -1/3

The length of one side of the box, in meters, is 0.138 meters.

The density of water is approximately 1000 kg/m^3 or 1 g/cm^3. If a cubic box is filled with 2650 g of water, we can find the volume of the box and then find one side length.

Volume = Mass / Density = 2650 g/(1 g/cm^3) = 2650 cm^3

Since the box is cubic, one side length is the cube root of the volume.

Side length = (Volume)^(1/3) = (2650 cm^3)^(1/3) = 13.8 cm

To convert cm to meters, divide by 100:

Side length = 13.8 cm/100 cm/m = 0.138 m

To know more about length, here

https://brainly.com/question/28537063

#SPJ4

Answer:

2,4,5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Tens place: 8

Tenths place: 5

Ten thousandths place: 2

Answers:

tenths place = 5

ten-thousandths place = 2

======================================================

Explanation:

Refer to the place value chart shown below.

The 5 is in the tenths place which is one spot to the right of the decimal point. The ten-thousandths place is four spots to the right of the decimal point.

The solution:

Given:

Required:

Give the name of the given expression, and state the degree.

The given expression is a Polynomial (since it has 3 terms)

The degree is 4 because it has 4 as its highest power of the unknown)

Therefore, the correct answers are:

Name = polynomial

Degree = 4

There are 18 possible outcomes where exactly one person receives the meal they ordered.

We can approach this problem by using the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (PIE). Let A, B, and C be the events that exactly one person receives the beef, chicken, and fish meals respectively.

We want to find the number of outcomes where exactly one person receives the meal they ordered, which is given by

|A ∪ B ∪ C|

By PIE, we have

|A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A| + |B| + |C| - |A ∩ B| - |A ∩ C| - |B ∩ C| + |A ∩ B ∩ C|

To calculate each term, we need to count the number of outcomes where

A: exactly one person receives the beef meal

There are 3 choices for which person receives the beef meal. Once that person's meal is determined, there are 6 choices for the order in which the remaining 8 people receive their meals (3 chicken and 3 fish). Thus, |A| = 3 × 6 = 18.

B: exactly one person receives the chicken meal

The calculation for |B| is the same as for |A|, so |B| = 18.

C: exactly one person receives the fish meal

The calculation for |C| is the same as for |A| and |B|, so |C| = 18.

A ∩ B: exactly one person receives the beef meal and exactly one person receives the chicken meal

There are 3 choices for which person receives the beef meal, and then 2 choices for which of the remaining 2 people receives the chicken meal. Once those two people's meals are determined, there are 4 choices for the order in which the remaining 6 people receive their meals (3 fish and 1 remaining beef or chicken). Thus, |A ∩ B| = 3 × 2 × 4 = 24.

A ∩ C: exactly one person receives the beef meal and exactly one person receives the fish meal

The calculation for |A ∩ C| is the same as for |A ∩ B|, so |A ∩ C| = 24.

B ∩ C: exactly one person receives the chicken meal and exactly one person receives the fish meal

The calculation for |B ∩ C| is the same as for |A ∩ B| and |A ∩ C|, so |B ∩ C| = 24.

A ∩ B ∩ C: exactly one person receives each type of meal

There are 3 choices for which person receives the beef meal, 2 choices for which of the remaining 2 people receives the chicken meal, and 1 choice for which of the remaining 1 person receives the fish meal. Once those three people's meals are determined, there are 3! = 6 choices for the order in which the remaining 6 people receive their meals (2 beef, 2 chicken, and 2 fish). Thus, |A ∩ B ∩ C| = 3 × 2 × 1 × 6 = 36.

Putting it all together, we have

|A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A| + |B| + |C| - |A ∩ B| - |A ∩ C| - |B ∩ C| + |A ∩ B ∩ C|

= 18 + 18 + 18 - 24 - 24 - 24 + 36

= 18

Learn more about Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion here

brainly.com/question/27975057

#SPJ4

Answer:

180

Step-by-step explanation:

A 3-digit number cannot start with 0, so the leftmost digit is a choice of 6 digits out of the 7. The middle digit can be chosen from all 7 digits minus the one already used, so there are 6 choices. The right digit can be chosen from 5.

6 × 6 × 5 = .180

The number of three-digit numbers that can be formed from the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 is 180.

This can be calculated by finding the number of element availabe at first place which is 6 excluding 0 than for second position 6 as first number is excluded and 0 is added and for the last positon the number of possibe combination is 5 as 2 digits are already used.

The final answer is 6*6*5 = 180

so count of 3 digit numbers that can be formed by the given set of digit without repetetion allowed is  180

To know more about three-digit numbers click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/16878161#

#SPJ11

The total present value of these payments at the time the first payment is made is 1,735.85 (747.26 + 988.59).

To calculate the present value of these payments, we need to use the formula for the present value of an annuity:

\(PV = (P/i) x [1 - (1+i)^-n]\)

Where:
P = payment amount
i = annual effective rate
n = number of payments

Using this formula, we can calculate the present value of the first 10 payments:

\(PV = (100/0.07) x [1 - (1+0.07)^-10] = 747.26\)

To calculate the present value of the remaining 10 payments, we need to first calculate the payment amounts. To do

this, we can use the following formula:

\(Pn = P1 x (1 + g)^n\)

Where:
Pn = payment in year n
P1 = first payment amount
g = growth rate
n = number of years since first payment

For the 11th payment:

\(P11 = 105 x (1 + 0.05)^1 = 110.25\)

For the 12th payment:

\(P12 = 110.25 x (1 + 0.05)^1 = 115.76\)

And so on, until the 20th payment:

\(P20 = 163.32 x (1 - 0.05)^8 = 79.24\)

Now we can calculate the present value of these payments:

PV = \((110.25/0.07) x [1 - (1+0.07)^-10] + (115.76/0.07) x [1 - (1+0.07)^-9] + ... + (79.24/0.07) x [1 - (1+0.07)^-1]\)

PV = 988.59

for such more question on word problem

https://brainly.com/question/21405634

#SPJ11

The equation "ax2 = y," which has one solution unless a = 4, and none unless a = 4, has a solution. x = √(-4ay) / (2a) restricted by the condition that y be negative.

We may use the quadratic formula to determine the solutions to an equation for various values of an to construct a solution to the equation "ax² = y," which has no solution when a = 4 & just one solution in all other cases.

According to the quadratic formula, the answers to the problem "ax2 + bx + c = 0" are provided by

x = (-b +/- √(b² - 4ac)) / (2a)

In this formula, if we add "ax² = y," we obtain

x = (-0 +/- √(0² - 4ay)) / (2a)

which simplifies to

x = √(-4ay) / (2a)

If a = 4, the equation becomes

x = √(-16y) / 8

The equation has no solutions if y is positive because the value of (-16y) is fictitious. The value of (-16y) is real if y is negative, but the equation is still unsolvable since x cannot have a negative value. As a result, when a = 4, the problem has no solutions.

The equation has a single solution provided by any other value of a.

x = √(-4ay) / (2a)

For example, if a = 3, the equation becomes

x = √(-12y) / 6

Since √(-12y) is imaginary if y is positive, the problem has no solutions. If y is negative, √(-12y) has a real value, and there is only one solution to the problem.

Learn more about the polynomial equation at

https://brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ4

Answer:

40

Given:

x=-2

Step-by-step explanation:

24−8x

24 - 8(-2)

24- (-16)

24+16

40

hope it helps you!!

The Root cause analysis uses one of the following techniques is (D) Ishikawa diagram.

The Root cause analysis is a problem-solving technique that aims to identify the underlying reasons or causes of a particular problem or issue.

It helps in identifying the root cause of a problem by breaking it down into its smaller components and analyzing them using a systematic approach.

The Ishikawa diagram, also known as a fishbone diagram or cause-and-effect diagram, is one of the most widely used techniques for conducting root cause analysis.

It is a visual tool that helps in identifying the possible causes of a problem by categorizing them into different branches or categories.

The Ishikawa diagram can be used in various industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, and service industries, and can help in improving processes, reducing costs, and increasing efficiency.

In summary, the root cause analysis technique uses the Ishikawa diagram to identify the underlying reasons for a particular problem.

Know more about Ishikawa diagram here:

https://brainly.com/question/14458793

#SPJ11

Answer:

256

Step-by-step explanation:

All of these are multiples of 4.

4^2= 16

4^3=64

4^4=256

Answer:

256.

Step-by-step explanation:

(4) x 4 = 16

(16) x 4 = (64)

64 x 4 = (256)

Answer:

x=5/3 or 2

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason it is not possible to fix the poster on the wall, even though the area of the poster is less than the area of the wall.

Sheela is correct. It is not possible to fix the poster on the wall, even though the area of the poster is less than the area of the wall.

The reason is that the dimensions of the poster are larger than the dimensions of the wall, which means it cannot fit properly.

Let's assume the length and width of the wall are Lw and Ww, respectively, and the length and width of the poster are Lp and Wp, respectively.

Given:

Area of the wall = 64 sq cm

Area of the poster = 48 sq cm

We know that the area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its length by its width:

Area of the wall = Lw * Ww

Area of the poster = Lp * Wp

From the given information, we have:

Lw * Ww = 64  ---(Equation 1)

Lp * Wp = 48  ---(Equation 2)

We need to compare the dimensions of the poster (Lp and Wp) with the dimensions of the wall (Lw and Ww).

Let's consider the scenario where the dimensions of the poster are larger than the dimensions of the wall:

Lp > Lw and Wp > Ww

If we substitute these values in Equation 2, we get:

Lw * Ww = 48

Since Lp > Lw and Wp > Ww, the area of the poster (48 sq cm) cannot fit within the area of the wall (64 sq cm).

Therefore, the reason it is not possible to fix the poster on the wall, even though the area of the poster is less than the area of the wall, is that the dimensions of the poster are larger than the dimensions of the wall, making it impossible to fit the entire poster on the wall.

Learn more about area here: brainly.com/question/1631786

#SPJ11

Answer:

It would be 2 (10)

Step-by-step explanation:

If you replace x with 10 then you have a multiplacation problem  and the output of the answer is 20

To find the sum of an infinite geometric series, we need to check if the common ratio (r) of the series lies between -1 and 1.

If the common ratio is within this range, the series converges and has a finite sum. Otherwise, if the common ratio is outside this range, the series diverges and does not have a finite sum. In this case, the common ratio (r) is given by: r = 0.222 / 0.117 = 1.897 Since the absolute value of the common ratio (|r| = 1.897) is greater than 1, the infinite geometric series diverges. Therefore, the sum of the series does not exist.

learn more about:-  infinite geometric series here

https://brainly.com/question/12742266

#SPJ11

Bayes' theorem is used to connect the probability of a person's DNA profile appearing in a sample with the possibility of that person being guilty.

Likelihood ratio (LR) is the ratio of the possibility of the evidence given the accused's guilt divided by the probability of the evidence given the accused's innocence. LR is a frequent tool used by experts to estimate the likelihood of a suspect being the source of a DNA sample. The likelihood ratio can be used to assess the probability of a given event. For example, it may be used to determine the likelihood of a crime suspect's DNA profile appearing in a sample.

It is essential to know the likelihood ratio of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth occurrence of the same diagnosis for the same person to make an accurate assessment of this probability. This may be accomplished by calculating separate likelihood ratios for each occurrence.

In any likelihood ratio calculation, Bayes' theorem is used to link the probability of an individual's DNA profile appearing in a sample with the possibility of that person being guilty. This theorem helps to account for the possibility of coincidental matches.

The value of the likelihood ratio is determined by the strength of the DNA evidence in the case. When there is a higher probability of a match, the ratio will be higher. The value of the LR should be sufficiently large to establish the probability of the evidence given the suspect's guilt or innocence. Typically, an LR of more than 100 is considered a strong match.

The likelihood ratio for the first occurrence is calculated by dividing the likelihood of the evidence given the accused's guilt by the likelihood of the evidence given the accused's innocence. The same calculation is repeated for each additional occurrence. The sum of the likelihood ratios for all occurrences is used to compute the overall likelihood ratio for the case.

To conclude, the separate likelihood ratios for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth occurrences of the same diagnosis for the same person can be calculated to assess the probability of a given event. Bayes' theorem is used to connect the probability of a person's DNA profile appearing in a sample with the possibility of that person being guilty. An LR of more than 100 is considered a strong match.

To know more about likelihood ratio,

https://brainly.com/question/31417586

#SPJ11

-260

then

-5x

-13x+390

-390

/-13

=

Answer:

x=30

Step-by-step explanation:

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

The expression for the area under the curve y = x^3 from 0 to 1, as a limit, is A = 1/4.

(a) To find an expression for the area under the curve y = x^3 from 0 to 1 using Definition 2, we need to approximate the area using a sum and then take the limit as the number of approximating rectangles approaches infinity.

Let's divide the interval [0, 1] into n equal subintervals. The width of each subinterval will be Δx = 1/n. We can choose any point within each subinterval as the representative x-value for that subinterval. Let's choose the right endpoint of each subinterval as our representative x-value.

The right endpoint of the ith subinterval will be x_i = iΔx = i/n, where i ranges from 1 to n. The corresponding y-value for each x_i is y_i = (i/n)^3.

The area of each rectangle can be approximated as the product of the width and height of the rectangle, which is ΔA_i = Δx  y_i = (1/n)  (i/n)^3.

The total area under the curve can be approximated by summing up the areas of all the rectangles:

A = Σ(ΔA_i) = Σ[(1/n)  (i/n)^3] for i = 1 to n.

(b) The formula given in Appendix E states that the sum of the cubes of the first n integers is [n(n+1)/2]^2. Therefore, we have:

1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + ... + n^3 = [n(n+1)/2]^2.

Using this formula, we can rewrite the expression for the area under the curve as a limit:

A ≈ Σ[(1/n)  (i/n)^3] for i = 1 to n

= (1/n^4)  [1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + ... + n^3]

= (1/n^4)  [n(n+1)/2]^2.

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we have:

A = lim(n→∞) [(1/n^4) [n(n+1)/2]^2]

= lim(n→∞) [(n^2(n+1)/2)^2 / n^4]

= lim(n→∞) [(n^4 + 2n^3 + n^2) / 4n^2]

= lim(n→∞) [(1 + 2/n + 1/n^2) / 4]

= (1 + 0 + 0) / 4

= 1/4.

Therefore, the expression for the area under the curve y = x^3 from 0 to 1, as a limit, is A = 1/4.

Learn more about Rectangle here:

https://brainly.in/question/18298929

#SPJ11

Neither student is correct and Venus is closer to the correct answer.

What is the proper fraction?

A proper fraction is a fraction where the numerator is smaller than the denominator. In other words, it represents a value that is less than one. Proper fractions are usually expressed in the form of a/b, where a is the numerator and b is the denominator.

Neither student is correct. The fraction 7/8 is a proper fraction, which means that it represents a value that is less than 1. It cannot be equivalent to a percentage that is greater than 100.

To convert a fraction to a percentage, we multiply the fraction by 100. So, to find the equivalent percentage for 7/8, we can calculate:

7/8 x 100 = 87.5%

Therefore, Venus is closer to the correct answer with her estimate of about 88%. Keyshawn may have made the mistake of multiplying 7/8 by 100 and getting 114% instead of dividing 7 by 8 to get the decimal equivalent of 0.875, and then multiplying by 100 to get the percentage equivalent of 87.5%.

Hence, neither student is correct and Venus is closer to the correct answer.

To learn more about the proper fraction, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17220365

#SPJ1