One factor that does not determine the price elasticity of demand is? A) time needed to adjust to price changes. B) relative need and relative cost C) availability of substitute D) prices of related complements

Answer:

n a free market economy, the law of supply and demand, rather than a central government, regulates production and labor. Companies sell goods and services at the highest price consumers are willing to pay while workers earn the highest wages companies are willing to pay for their services.

Explanation:

:)

In a free market economy, the law of supply and demand, rather than a central government, regulates production and labor. Companies sell goods and services at the highest price consumers are willing to pay while workers earn the highest wages companies are willing to pay for their servic

Answer:

In most systems, the prime minister is the presiding member and chairman of the cabinet. In a minority of systems, notably in semi-presidential systems, a prime minister is the official appointed to manage the civil service and execute the directives of the head of state.

Explanation:

Hope that helped!

Answer:

What is your profession?

What digital technology do you use at work?

How does this technology help you?

Would you be able to do your job without it?

What hardware do you use?

If so what software do you use with it?

Explanation:

Answer:

Blood Payment is what she asks for

She wanted blood payment even at all these times when she could ask for various things.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Inspired by the scientific method, social work theories uncover the why of human behavior, while social work practice models reveal how you can effect change for individuals, couples, families, and communities at large.

Answer:

Traits traditionally viewed as masculine in Western society include strength, courage, independence, leadership, and assertiveness. Machismo is a form of masculinity that emphasizes power and is often associated with a disregard for consequences and responsibility.

Answer:

UM RECKLESS, DISRESPECTFULL SOMETIMES,

TRIES TO BE INDEPENDENT, HAS IT HARDER THAN GIRLS, DOES A LOT OF LIFE RISKING ACTIVITIES. HOPE THIS HELPS. PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIST

This entirely depends on the type of democracy the country chooses to pursue. In a democracy, if the country follows:

Direct Democracy: There will be no leadership, as each individual member gets a voting right. Since there is no leadership, there will be no power.

Indirect Democracy:

- Athens' version: Leadership was selected by the people, and they were only given the power to approve the laws. Creation and debate was up to the citizens.

- Romans' version: A republic was set up, in which the citizens elect representatives to pass laws based on the voters. Leaders did have some power, in the form of military, economic, and most national level security.

- Great Britain's version: A two house was set up as a separate but "equal" to the monarchy. In this case, the house became more powerful than the monarchy in most of her history. The house was split into two (hence two houses), one made up of lords (House of Lords), while the other was made up of the common people (House of Commons). The monarchy in most cases was suppressed, and sometimes even only became a figure-head. In this case, the leader's power ranged from next to nothing, to being a strong-arm leadership.

- Monitory Democracy: A monitory democracy takes away most of the power of the federal government, and simply leaves it to "monitor" the public health and good, hence it's name. In this case, the Democracy would feature a strong security force but lenient power in using it.

etc.

In essence, a democracy can have a range in amount of power each leader can have. It entirely depends on what the country needs, as well as it's culture and historical elements. However, the rule of thumb of the amount of power that a leader can have in a democracy is to allow space for him/her to be able to create legislations for the country's benefits, as well as limitations to ensure that the democracy continues to strive (essentially keeping it from falling into a fascist state).

~

Hello! When it comes to keeping undesirable information about yourself from being available to employers on social media, there are three tips you can follow.

1. Adjust your privacy settings: One important step is to review and adjust your privacy settings on social media platforms. By doing so, you can limit who can view your posts, photos, and personal information.

Make sure to set your accounts to "private" or "friends only" to restrict access to your content.
2. Be mindful of what others post about you: It's not just your own content that can be seen by potential employers; it's also what others post about you.

Keep an eye on tagged photos and posts that you are mentioned in. If you come across something undesirable or inappropriate, politely ask the person to remove it or untag you from it.
3. Regularly review your online presence: Take the time to regularly search for your name on search engines and social media platforms.

This allows you to see what information or content is available about you. If you find something that you consider undesirable or inappropriate, take steps to have it removed or consider adjusting your privacy settings further.
For more questions on social media

https://brainly.com/question/13909780

#SPJ8

If both China and the U.S. specialize in trade, it means that the countries have different opportunity costs to produce each good.

If a price floor is proposed and passed on steel, the result would be a surplus of steel.

China and the U.S. in this scenario would specialize in producing one good and trade in the other because they have different opportunity costs in producing each good.

They will therefore produce the good that has a lower opportunity cost, and trade the good that has a higher cost.

If a price floor is proposed and it is higher than the equilibrium price, it means that suppliers will make more money.

They will therefore produce more steel than the market needs and so there will be a surplus.

Find out more more on price floors at https://brainly.com/question/24827521.

#SPJ1

Answer:

It was a symbol of truth (or Good).

Explanation:

The perspectives include the following:

Perspectives:

Enhancing Cultural Understanding: Incorporating indigenous knowledge in science education provides students with a greater understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity, which is essential in a globalized world.

Promoting Critical Thinking: Integrating indigenous knowledge systems into science education can promote critical thinking skills in students, as it requires them to analyze, evaluate and compare different perspectives.

Encouraging Sustainable Development: Incorporating indigenous knowledge can encourage students to develop environmentally sustainable practices that are deeply rooted in traditional knowledge.

Recognizing Multiple Ways of Knowing: Integrating indigenous knowledge into science education can help recognize and validate multiple ways of knowing, beyond the Western scientific perspective.

Encouraging Community Involvement: Incorporating indigenous knowledge can foster community involvement in science education and promote meaningful collaborations between indigenous communities and educational institutions.

Challenges:

Lack of Resources: One of the biggest challenges to incorporating indigenous knowledge in science education is the lack of resources, including textbooks, teaching materials, and qualified teachers who are knowledgeable about indigenous cultures.

Cultural Barriers: Cultural differences between indigenous communities and non-indigenous teachers and students can create significant challenges to incorporating indigenous knowledge into science education.

Resistance to Change: There may be resistance from traditional science educators, policymakers, and stakeholders who may perceive indigenous knowledge as inferior or incompatible with Western scientific knowledge.

Intellectual Property and Ownership: The use of indigenous knowledge in science education can raise concerns about intellectual property and ownership of traditional knowledge, and the need to respect the rights and interests of indigenous communities.

Appropriateness and Relevance: It is essential to ensure that the incorporation of indigenous knowledge is done in a culturally sensitive and appropriate manner that reflects the needs and values of indigenous communities, and that the knowledge is relevant and applicable to modern science education.

learn more about science education: https://brainly.com/question/17229191

#SPJ1

Answer:

The common people generally viewed Andrew Jackson as a champion of the people who sought to use the power of the presidency to stand up for their rights and interests. He was seen as a populist leader who was willing to challenge the political establishment and push for reform. The upper class, on the other hand, viewed Jackson as a dangerous demagogue who was undermining the rule of law and disregarding the interests of the wealthy and powerful.

Explanation:

Answer:

I dont have the 7th grade one but if you need 6th I can help

Answer: Both seek totalitarian rule

A person's eligibility for release from prison is dependent on  the law and

sentence imposed by the court.

When a person is tried and found guilty in the court of law, the judge reads

out the sentence which is meant to be served by the party guilty of the

offence.

When he's done or is some years into the sentence, the individual can be

released on normal grounds or on parole. Community supervision then

comes in as it helps integrate the affected individual into the society.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25481212

The answer is: B. The Court has a duty to protect students' right to free speech.

The key part of the excerpt is that "Official censorship of student speech on the ground that it addresses 'potentially sensitive topics' is...impermissible." This indicates that the author believes students should have freedom of speech, even to discuss topics that some may find sensitive.

The options A, C and D suggest giving more authority to the state or restricting students' civil liberties. Only option B is aligned with the belief expressed in the excerpt that students have a right to free speech that the Court has a duty to protect.

Therefore, a person who agrees with this dissenting opinion would most support conclusion B: The Court has a duty to protect students' right to free speech.

The person who agrees with the dissenting opinion in this case would most likely support the conclusion that the Court has a duty to protect students' right to free speech (option B).

The state in regulating students' behavior, contradicts the idea that official censorship and stifling of student speech is impermissible.

The excerpt highlights the importance of the state educator's mandate to teach moral and political values, but it also emphasizes that this mandate does not grant the authority to act as "thought police" and stifle discussions on non-state-approved topics.

Furthermore, it argues against official censorship of student speech related to "potentially sensitive topics."

The dissenting opinion would likely argue that the First Amendment applies to schoolchildren and that they should not be stripped of their right to free speech within the school environment.

They would advocate for the Court's responsibility to protect students' right to express their opinions and engage in discussions, even if those discussions touch upon sensitive or controversial topics.

Option C, suggesting that students create major social problems by abusing their civil liberties, is not supported by the excerpt. It does not address the behavior or actions of students but focuses on the limitations of the state educator's authority.

A person who agrees with the dissenting opinion in this case would most likely support the conclusion that the Court has a duty to protect students' right to free speech.

For similar questions on dissenting

https://brainly.com/question/28734722

#SPJ8

Answer:

The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:

B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.

Explanation:

Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.

The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism. Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.

Citizens have a crucial responsibility to actively engage in creating safe and healthy environments through advocacy, participation, and collective action.

While governments and institutions play a significant role in creating and enforcing regulations, individuals also have a vital part to play in maintaining a safe and healthy environment.

In conclusion, citizens play a crucial role in ensuring that their environments promote safe and healthy living. Through active engagement, personal responsibility, environmental sustainability, and holding others accountable, individuals can contribute to the creation of safer and healthier communities for everyone.

For more questions on environments

https://brainly.com/question/5511643

#SPJ8

Answer:

D

Explanation:

the answer is D.........

,,,,

As an individual in the community, it is our responsibility to contribute to the environmental health and safety of the community.

Here are three critical evaluations of my own contribution to environmental health and safety in my community:

1. Waste management: Waste management is one of the significant environmental problems. I have been able to contribute to waste management by making sure that I separate my waste and dispose of them in the appropriate bin. For instance, I separate my plastics, paper, and glass, and I dispose of them at the recycling center.

2. Energy conservation: Energy conservation is essential for environmental health and safety. As an individual, I have been able to contribute to energy conservation by switching off the lights and unplugging electronic devices when they are not in use. Also, I make use of energy-efficient bulbs, which reduces energy consumption.

3. Planting trees: Trees are essential to environmental health and safety. Trees help to absorb carbon dioxide, which is a major cause of climate change. I have been able to contribute to environmental health and safety by planting trees in my community.

For instance, I volunteered in a tree planting exercise organized by the community. We planted over 50 trees, which have helped to reduce pollution and also provided a habitat for animals.The importance of contributing to environmental health and safety cannot be overemphasized. We all have a role to play in making our environment safe and healthy for all.

Know more about Waste management here:

https://brainly.com/question/29413663

#SPJ8

Answer:

Formation of alliances: The US formed alliances with other countries to contain the spread of communism. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was formed in 1949 to provide collective security against Soviet aggression.

Containment policy: The US adopted a policy of containment to prevent the spread of communism. This policy involved providing economic and military aid to countries threatened by communist expansion.

Proxy wars: The US fought several proxy wars against Soviet-backed forces, including the Korean War and the Vietnam War.

Arms race: The US engaged in an arms race with the Soviet Union, with both countries developing and testing nuclear weapons.

Diplomacy: The US engaged in diplomacy to resolve conflicts with the Soviet Union and other communist countries. This included the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) and the establishment of diplomatic relations with China.

Overall, the US took a range of actions during the Cold War to promote its interests and limit the influence of the Soviet Union and communism.

Explanation:

the answer is dynamic because of the fact that there to options so narrow it down surch up what the words mean and then get ur answers :) have a good day