Please just give the answer no calculations .

Answer:

the answer to what?

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm sorry but confused on what the question is?

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

if a even number can go into a even number a even number of times its a irrational number

Answer: no it is rational

Step-by-step explanation: A number is only irrational if it has endless decimals after it.

half of the triangle is a right angle triangle, so we use the phythagoras theorem and multipy our answer by 2

The percentage of adults who have an IQ score between 92 and 112 points using the z score is 33.59%.

Given that,

Assume the distribution of IQ scores for adults can be modeled with a normal distribution with a mean score of 100 points and a standard deviation of 10 points.

μ = 100 and σ = 10

We have, z score, z = (x - μ) / σ

For x = 92,

z = (92 - 100) / 10 = -0.8

For x = 112,

z = (112 - 100) / 10 = 0.12

Percent corresponds to the left of z = -0.8 is 0.2119.

Percent corresponds to the left of z = 0.12 is 0.5478.

Required percent = 0.5478 - 0.2119 = 0.3359 = 33.59%

Hence the required percentage is 33.59%.

Learn more about z score here :

https://brainly.com/question/15016913

#SPJ4

The system of inequalities can be obtained from the given information

on the allowable weights and number of pots.

The correct responses:

The system of inequalities that represent the constraint on the number

of pots that can be included in one shipment are;

The inequality that represents the number total number of clay, T, in each shipment is 2 ≤ T ≤ 8

The inequality that represents weight of each shipment is w < 100 lbs

The weight of each shipment container = 20 lbs

The weight of the packing material = 1 lb

Therefore;

The weight of each clay flower pot = 15 lbs

The weight of each plastic flower pot = 7.5 lbs

Let "x" represent the number of clay flower pot included in one shipment

and let "y" represent the number of plastic flower pot included in one

shipment, we have;

The system of inequalities that represent the constraint on the number of pots that can be included in one shipment are as follows;

Learn more about inequalities here:

https://brainly.com/question/10868639

We will find the system of inequalities:

C*15 lb  + P*7.5lb < 79 lb

2  ≤ P + C ≤ 8

First, we need to define the variables that we will be using, these are:

From the first restriction, we have that:

2  ≤ P + C ≤ 8

The other restriction says that the weight must be less than 100lbs:

W < 100lbs

Where the weight is:

W = C*15 lb  + P*7.5lb + 20lb + 1lb

Where 20lb is the weight of the container and 1lb is the weight of the packing material, then we have:

C*15 lb  + P*7.5lb + 20lb + 1lb < 100lb

We can subtract 21 lb in both sides to get:

C*15 lb  + P*7.5lb < 100 lb - 21 lb

C*15 lb  + P*7.5lb < 79 lb

So we got our two inequalities, then the system is:

C*15 lb  + P*7.5lb < 79 lb

2  ≤ P + C ≤ 8

If you want to learn more about systems of inequalities, you can read:

https://brainly.com/question/9774970

Increasing the significance level of a hypothesis test, for example from 1% to 5%, does not directly affect the p-value of an observed test statistic. The p-value is determined by the data and the test statistic, not the significance level.

However, changing the significance level will affect your decision about whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level, denoted by alpha (α), represents the probability of making a Type I error, which occurs when you incorrectly reject the null hypothesis when it is true. By increasing the significance level, you are allowing for a higher probability of making a Type I error, making the test less stringent.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the observed value, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level, you reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

In conclusion, increasing the significance level of a hypothesis test will not cause the p-value of an observed test statistic to change. Instead, it will change the threshold at which you decide to reject the null hypothesis, making the test more likely to reject the null hypothesis, and increasing the chance of making a Type I error.

Learn more about hypothesis test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30588452

#SPJ11

The length of the arc subtended by the angle's rays is 0.02 times the radius of the circle

To find the length of the arc subtended by the angle's rays, we need to know the angle measure. Since we know that 1/360th of the circumference is 0.04 cm long, we can find the circumference by multiplying 0.04 cm by 360, which gives us 14.4 cm.

Now, we need to find the angle measure. Since the circle is centered at the vertex of the angle, the angle measures half the arc it subtends. Thus, we can find the angle measure by dividing the circumference by 2 and then multiplying by 1/360.

Angle measure = (14.4/2) x (1/360) = 0.02 radians

Finally, we can find the length of the arc subtended by the angle's rays by multiplying the angle measure by the radius of the circle.

Length of arc = 0.02 x radius


The length of the arc subtended by the angle's rays is 0.02 times the radius of the circle. The given information of 1/360th of the circumference being 0.04 cm long helped us find the circumference and subsequently the angle measure.

To know more about vertex of the angle visit:

brainly.com/question/30661720

#SPJ11

Answer:

This is the complete question;

What is the circumference of the circle?  shown in the image

(use 3.14 for pi )

A 18.84.98 cm

B. 36 cm

C. 37.68 cm

D. 37.7 cm

The circumference of the circle would be "C" 37.68 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The circumference of a circle is the distance around or right around the circle. The circumference of the circle is also the perimeter of the circle.

The circumference of the circle can be obtained using the relationship below;

C = πd

Where C is the circumference and its unknown

d is the diameter of the circle = 12 cm

π is a constant = 3.14

C = 3.14 x 12

C = 37.68 cm

Therefore the circumference of the circle would be 37.68 cm

We can conclude that they form a right triangle

So GF = FH

OF^2 = GF^2 + OG^2

OF^2 = 8.4^2 + 8^2

OF^2 = 70.56 + 64

OF^2 = 134.56

OF = 11.6

Answer:

the 1st 2nd and last one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The first one, the third and the fourth one.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have same slope

Slope = \(\dfrac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}\)

\(\dfrac{-3-y}{2-5}=\dfrac{4}{3}\\\\\\\dfrac{-3-y}{-3}=\dfrac{4}{3}\\\\\\-3-y=\dfrac{4}{3}*(-3)\\\\\\\)

-3-y = 4*(-1)

-3 - y = -4

- y = - 4 + 3

-y = -1

Divide both sides by (-1)

y = 1

Answer:

Hi friend! The product is 2,224 and the estimate is 2,000

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To estimate:

Exact answer:

Because the two answers are really close to each other, our rounded answer makes sense.

I hope this helps!

Answer:  

5 and 11/50  

Step-by-step explanation:

5.22 = 261/50 = 5 and 11/50

Answer:

an impasta

Step-by-step explanation:

sus

Answer: an Impasta

Step-by-step explanation:

Give me brainliest please lol

The length and width of the lot are 46m and 36m  respectively

Let the width of the lot be x,

therefore, length=x+10 (as the lot must be 10m longer than it's wide)

Now, according to the question:

Area of the lot= 1656 m²

Area of a rectangle is given by the product of it's length to width, that is:

⇒ Length × Width= 1656 m²

⇒ (10+x).x= 1656

⇒ 10x+x²= 1656

⇒ x²+10x-1656=0

⇒x²+46x-36x-1656=0

⇒x(x+46)-36(x+46)=0

⇒(x-36)(x+46)=0

⇒x=36 or x=-46(which can be ignored)

∴ x=36 and 10+x=46

So, the length of the lot is 46m and the width is 36m.

To learn more about area of rectangle,

visit; brainly.com/question/8663941

#SPJ4

The probability of winning by picking the number 30 in roulette is 1/38.

In the game of roulette, the wheel consists of 38 spaces, with numbers 0 through 36 and an additional space marked 00. When you pick a specific number, such as 30, the probability of that number coming up on the wheel can be determined by calculating the ratio of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.

In this case, there is only one favorable outcome, which is the ball landing on the number 30. The total number of possible outcomes is 38 since there are 37 numbered spaces (0 through 36) and one additional space for 00. Therefore, the probability of winning by picking the number 30 is 1 out of 38.

To put it simply, if you were to play roulette many times, you would expect the number 30 to come up approximately once every 38 spins on average. This probability remains the same for each individual spin, as each spin of the roulette wheel is an independent event.

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11.

Answer:

1/12 mi/min = 0.083 mi/min

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question given above, we obtained the following information:

Distance (d) = 5/6 mile

Time (t) = 10 mins

Speed (S) =?

Speed is simply defined as the rate of change of distance moved with time. It can be represented mathematically by the following equation:

Speed (S) = Distance (d) / time (t)

S = d/t

With the above formula, we can calculate Ellie's speed as follow:

Distance (d) = 5/6 mile

Time (t) = 10 mins

Speed (S) =?

S = d/t

S = 5/6 ÷ 10

S = 5/6 × 1/10

S = 5/60

S = 1/12 mi/min = 0.083 mi/min

Therefore, Ellie's speed is 1/12 mi/min.

Ellie speed in miles per minute is 1 / 12

Speed is a scalar quantity with only magnitude and no direction. Speed measures how fast an object is in motion.

Speed is represented mathematically as follows:

speed = distance /time

Ellie covers 5/6 miles in 10 minutes. Therefore,

distance = 5/6 miles

time = 10 minutes

Speed = \(\frac{\frac{5}{6} }{10}\) = \(\frac{5}{6}\) ×\(\frac{1}{10}\) = \(\frac{5}{60}\) = \(\frac{1}{12}\) miles per minutes

learn more on speed here: https://brainly.com/question/17426617?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

okay i will gladly

The equation of an exponential decay function with a range of (-∞,10), vertical shrink of 3/4, and vertical shift up 10 units is f(x) = 10 - (3/4)^x.

An exponential decay function can be written as f(x) = ab^x where b is the base of the exponential function and a is the initial value. If b is between 0 and 1, the function will exhibit exponential decay. Since we need a vertical shrink of 3/4, we can set b = 3/4.

We also need a vertical shift of 10 units, so we add 10 to the function. The resulting function is: f(x) = 10 - (3/4)^x. Therefore, the equation of an exponential decay function with a range of (-∞,10), vertical shrink of 3/4, and vertical shift up 10 units is f(x) = 10 - (3/4)^x.

To know more about exponential decay function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14355665#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The rate of change is positive 96%

Step-by-step explanation:

.96 = 96%

There is only one optimal solution for this linear programming problem, and it can be found by solving the problem using appropriate linear programming techniques.

Based on the given linear programming problem, the best option that fits the empty space above is "only one optimal solution."

To determine the number of optimal solutions, we need to consider the objective function and the constraints of the problem. The objective function, Z = 3x1 + 9x2, represents the quantity we want to minimize.

The constraints of the problem are as follows:

2x1 + 4x2 ≤ 16

5x1 + 15x2 ≤ 30

6x1 + 14x2 ≤ 42

x1 ≤ 55

x1, x2 ≥ 0

The feasible region is the area in the xy-plane that satisfies all the constraints. In this case, the feasible region is a bounded region since all constraints involve inequalities.

Since the objective function is a linear function and the feasible region is a bounded region, linear programming theory guarantees that there exists at least one optimal solution.

In this case, the optimal solution is the point within the feasible region that minimizes the objective function Z.

Therefore, there is only one optimal solution for this linear programming problem, and it can be found by solving the problem using appropriate linear programming techniques, such as the simplex method or graphical method.

To know more about optimal   refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28587689#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Neither

Step-by-step explanation:

None of them have the same angles as triange ABC.

Answer:

Graph C

Step-by-step explanation:

small slope for walking, flat for stopping, than there is a big slope for running

The missing Value, x, that when multiplied by 5/3^4 gives the result of 5^4 is 13125.

The missing value that, when multiplied by 5/3^4, gives the result of 5^4, we can set up the equation:

(5/3^4) * x = 5^4

To solve for x, we can simplify both sides of the equation. First, let's simplify the right side:

5^4 = 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 = 625

Now, let's simplify the left side:

5/3^4 = 5/(3 * 3 * 3 * 3) = 5/81

Now we have:

(5/81) * x = 625

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides of the equation by the reciprocal of 5/81, which is 81/5:

(81/5) * (5/81) * x = (81/5) * 625

On the left side, the fraction (81/5) * (5/81) simplifies to 1, leaving us with:

1 * x = (81/5) * 625

Simplifying the right side:

(81/5) * 625 = 13125

Therefore, the missing value, x, that when multiplied by 5/3^4 gives the result of 5^4 is 13125.

For more questions on Value.

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ8

Answer:

mode is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

it appears four times whereas no other number appears more than three times

firm 2's quantity at the Cournot equilibrium is q2=5/3.the inverse demand function: p=10−Q=10−(q1+q2)=10−(11/5+4/5)=4. firm 2's quantity at the new Cournot equilibrium is q2=4/5.

The best response of firm 1 is given by 1q1=5−0.5q21+q2, and the best response of firm 2 is given by 2q2=5−0.5q12+q1. These best response functions are illustrated in the following diagram:
At the Cournot equilibrium, the two firms' quantities will be such that they are both choosing the best response to the other's quantity, which means that they will be producing where the two functions intersect.

Therefore, solving the two best response functions simultaneously for q1 and q2 gives:
q1=q2=5/3
Therefore, firm 2's quantity at the Cournot equilibrium is q2=5/3.
The new best response function for firm 2 is given by 2q2=5−q1+2q22. This is obtained by replacing c2=2 with c2=4 in firm 2's profit function. The new best response function is illustrated below:

At the new Cournot equilibrium, the two firms' quantities will be such that they are both choosing the best response to the other's quantity, which means that they will be producing where the two functions intersect. Therefore, solving the two best response functions simultaneously for q1 and q2 gives:
q1=11/5
q2=4/5
Therefore, firm 2's quantity at the new Cournot equilibrium is q2=4/5.

To determine the market price at the new Cournot equilibrium, we substitute the new equilibrium quantities into the inverse demand function:
p=10−Q=10−(q1+q2)=10−(11/5+4/5)=4
Therefore, the market price at the new Cournot equilibrium is p=4.

In this exercise, we consider a market with two firms, 1 and 2, facing the inverse demand p()=10− p(Q)=10-Q where =1+2Q=q1+q2.

The two firms incur a marginal cost of production c1=c2=2c1=c2=2, produce a homogeneous good, and are Cournot competitors. The best response of firm 1 is given by 1q1=5−0.5q21+q2, and the best response of firm 2 is given by 2q2=5−0.5q12+q1. These best response functions are illustrated in the diagram below:

At the Cournot equilibrium, the two firms' quantities will be such that they are both choosing the best response to the other's quantity, which means that they will be producing where the two functions intersect

. Therefore, solving the two best response functions simultaneously for q1 and q2 gives q1=q2=5/3. Therefore, firm 2's quantity at the Cournot equilibrium is q2=5/3.The new best response function for firm 2 is given by 2q2=5−q1+2q22. This is obtained by replacing c2=2 with c2=4 in firm 2's profit function.

The new best response function is illustrated in the following diagram:At the new Cournot equilibrium, the two firms' quantities will be such that they are both choosing the best response to the other's quantity, which means that they will be producing where the two functions intersect.

Therefore, solving the two best response functions simultaneously for q1 and q2 gives q1=11/5 and q2=4/5. Therefore, firm 2's quantity at the new Cournot equilibrium is q2=4/5

To determine the market price at the new Cournot equilibrium, we substitute the new equilibrium quantities into the inverse demand function: p=10−Q=10−(q1+q2)=10−(11/5+4/5)=4. Therefore, the market price at the new Cournot equilibrium is p=4.

In conclusion, we have analyzed the effect of a raising rival's cost strategy on a Cournot duopoly. We have shown that the strategy reduces firm 2's quantity and increases the market price, but does not affect firm 1's quantity.

To know more about demand  visit:

brainly.com/question/30402955

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is d

Step-by-step explanation:

Can i have brainliest?

Answer: 3/52

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to pick a diamond jack, diamond queen or diamond king

There are only 3 of those so

P(DJ or DQ or DK) = 3/52        There are 3 of those out of 52 total