I actually do not know how to do this, I'm just trying to a point, so if you could give me some, that would be really really amazing
Describe what happened in Berlin in the 1940’s
Answer:
The Battle of Berlin resulted in the surrender of the German army and the death of Adolf Hitler. It was a resounding victory for the Soviet Union and the Allies.
Explanation:
How would the John Lewis Voting Right Advancement Act protect voting rights?
Answer:
i hope this helped u ↓
Explanation:
The Senate differs from the House of Representatives by __________. Select all that apply.
The Senate advises the President and the House can impeach the President.
The Senate leader is the President pro tempore and House leader is the Speaker of the House.
If both President and Vice President should die, the Speaker of the House becomes President.
The Senate confirms cabinet secretaries, justices and ambassadors.
The Speaker of the House appoints the president of the Senate.
Answer:
this is all right
Explanation:
the senate confirms cabinet secretaries justices And ambassadors
INTERPRET THE EVIDENCE
1. How does the Why We Fight transcript portray Japan and its leadership? How does it compare Japan to Germany and Italy (Document 23. 1)?
2. How would you describe the government's strategy for relocating the Japanese (Document 23. 2? What hardships would Japanese people face? What assistance did the government offer to relocated people?
3. Why did Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone uphold the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 (Document 23. 3)? How does he counter arguments that a curfew for Japanese people constitutes racial discrimination?
4. Why did Justice Frank Murphy argue that internment was unconstitutional (Document 23. 4)? Why, in his opinion, did the government specifically target Japanese citizens?
5. What did Charles Kikuchi mean by his statement that Americans who protested
his right to vote were more dangerous than Japanese American citizens (Docu-ment 23. 5)?
6. How did opponents of internment invoke American values in their arguments?
PUT IT IN CONTEXT
1. In what ways was internment different from other instances when the United States suppressed civil liberties during wartime?
2. What might have been alternatives to Japanese internment?
The Why We Fight transcript portrays Japan and its leadership as aggressive and expansionist, seeking to conquer and dominate other countries in the Pacific region.
The government's strategy for relocating the Japanese involved forcibly removing them from their homes and communities and placing them in internment camps.
Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone upheld the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 because he believed it was a necessary measure to protect national security during wartime.
Justice Frank Murphy argued that internment was unconstitutional because it violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Charles Kikuchi meant that the Americans who protested his right to vote were more dangerous than Japanese American citizens because they were violating the principles of democracy and equality that the country was supposed to uphold.
Opponents of internment invoked American values such as freedom, justice, and equality in their arguments. They argued that internment violated these values and that the government's actions were based on prejudice and discrimination rather than any legitimate national security concerns.
Contextual Questions:
Internment was different from other instances when the United States suppressed civil liberties during wartime because it targeted a specific racial and ethnic group, rather than individuals or groups suspected of actual wrongdoing. It also involved the forced relocation and detention of innocent people, rather than just the imposition of restrictions or surveillance measures.
Alternatives to Japanese internment might have included increased surveillance and background checks on individuals suspected of espionage or sabotage, or the use of targeted restrictions on travel or other activities. The government could also have invested more resources in educating the public about the dangers of discrimination and prejudice, rather than giving in to these sentiments and resorting to extreme measures like internment.
Learn more about portrays Japan
https://brainly.com/question/9629646
#SPJ4
Which phrase correctly completes box #1 in the chart above?
A) state constitution
B) us Congress
C) us constitution
D) federal government
Answer:
A) state constitution
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Match each landmark Supreme Court case with the correct ruling
Marbury v. Madison
Plessy v. Ferguson
Brown v. Board of Education
Miranda v Arizona
Segregation is constitutional.
An accused person's Fifth Amendment rights must be protected.
Segregation is unconstitutional.
The US government must function within the rule of law as established in
the Constitution
Miranda vs. Arizona - 5th amendment
Brown vs. Board of Education - Segregation was unconstitutional.
Marbury vs. Madison - U.S. Government must function...
Plessy vs. Ferguson - Segregation is constitutional.
What was Marbury vs. Madison Case?A significant ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) established for the first time that federal courts had the authority to invalidate a congressional act on the grounds that it contravened the U.S. Constitution.
It was an ingenious answer to the issue. Marshall, who wrote the court's ruling, concluded that when Jefferson stopped the nominees' commissions after they had already been confirmed and sealed, he had violated their constitutional rights. Marbury also had the right to file a lawsuit and seek redress, and a federal judge may issue a writ directing Jefferson to comply.
But things became much more difficult when it came to the third question. A section of the Judicial Act of 1789 provided the Supreme Court the authority to issue writs directly to federal office holders without a plaintiff having to go through a lower court, which allowed the court to hear Marbury's case directly.
To learn more about Marbury vs. Madison Case follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/12300066
#SPJ2
I NEED HELP ASAP!!
How did easy consumer credit help the U.S. economy during the early 1920s?
(A) Unemployment dropped because people had to find jobs to make their payments.
(B) Farmers sold more crops directly to consumers and so made more profits.
(C) Interest payments on personal debt allowed banks to make large investments.
(D) People bought more goods and created high demand for new products.
Answer:
(D) People bought more goods and created high demand for new products.
Explanation:
During the early 1920s, easy consumer credit helped the U.S. economy by allowing people to purchase goods on credit. This led to increased consumer spending and higher demand for products. As a result, businesses experienced higher sales and profits, which stimulated economic growth. The availability of easy credit made it easier for individuals to make purchases and fuelled a consumer-driven economy during that period.
\(\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}\)
♥️ \(\large{\textcolor{red}{\underline{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}\)
Who founded the American Indian Defense Association?
Put each identified historical event into chronological order:
*Beginning of the Bronze Age *The Battle of Kadesh
*Earliest evidence of Agriculture
*Region of Tutankhamon begins
*Establishment of Sumerian Schools teaching cuneiform writing
*Babylonians win their independence
*David becomes king of the Hebrew people
*Babylonian captivity begins
*Peach treaty is concluded between the Egyptians and Hittite *Kush kingdom extends into the Nile Valley
The destruction of Jerusalem in 605 B.C. and the Cyrus Decree in 536 B.C. are the occasions and dates that denoted the start and conclusion of the Babylonian captivity.
Babylonian Exile is another name for Babylonian Captivity. The Babylonian captivity in Jewish history refers to the period when members of the ancient Kingdom of Judah were forcibly imprisoned in Babylonia.
Chronological order
3. Earliest evidence of Agriculture
1. Beginning of the Bronze Age
5. Establishment of Sumerian Schools teaching cuneiform writing
7. David becomes king of the Hebrew people
9. Peach treaty is concluded between the Egyptians and Hittite
2. The Battle of Kadesh
4. Region of Tutankhamon begins
6. Babylonians win their independence
8. Babylonian captivity begins
10. Kush kingdom extends into the Nile Valley
This is an illustration of cultural diffusion: the transfer of inventions or cultural characteristics from one society to another. Multiple, initially distinct civilizations can share some characteristics or behaviours thanks to cultural diffusion.
Learn more about Babylonian Captivity here
https://brainly.com/question/4655530
#SPJ11
The Complete question is
Put each identified historical event into chronological order:
1. Beginning of the Bronze Age
2. The Battle of Kadesh
3. Earliest evidence of Agriculture
4. Region of Tutankhamon begins
5. Establishment of Sumerian Schools teaching cuneiform writing
6. Babylonians win their independence
7. David becomes king of the Hebrew people
8. Babylonian captivity begins
9. Peach treaty is concluded between the Egyptians and Hittite
10.Kush kingdom extends into the Nile Valley
Why did the murder of Emmett till receive so much attention?
Explanation:
Emmett Till's murder was a spark in the upsurge of activism and resistance that became known as the Civil Rights movement.
Which of the following correctly describes the Europe First strategy?
The Europe First strategy was a military strategy adopted by the Allied Powers during World War II, specifically the United States and the United Kingdom. Option D is the correct answer.
The Europe First strategy was based on the understanding that Nazi Germany posed a significant threat to global security and needed to be defeated first. It was believed that once Germany was defeated, the full resources and military strength of the Allied Powers could be concentrated on the war in the Pacific against Japan.
There were several reasons for adopting the Europe First strategy. Firstly, Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler had rapidly conquered a significant portion of Europe and posed a direct threat to the United Kingdom and other Allied nations. The defeat of Germany was seen as crucial to liberating occupied territories, restoring peace in Europe, and ensuring the security of the Allied powers. Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on military:
https://brainly.com/question/1050942
#SPJ8
Which of the following correctly describes the Europe First strategy adopted by the United States during World War II?
(A) The United States would focus its military resources on defeating Germany first, while maintaining a defensive posture in the Pacific.
(B) The United States would focus its military resources on defeating Japan first, while providing limited support to the Allies in Europe.
(C) The United States would focus its military resources on defeating both Germany and Japan simultaneously.
(D) The military strategy adopted by the Allied Powers during World War II, specifically the United States and the United Kingdom.
How did tourism impact South Carolina?
Answer:
Tourism solidified its place in South Carolina’s economy during the twentieth century, but people have long flocked to the Palmetto State. Numerous travel accounts from before the Civil War show that northerners enjoyed the sights and sounds of South Carolina. Near Charleston, northerners went to see the races, visited sites of the Revolutionary War, and wrote home that they had caught a glimpse of a “genuine” plantation. Charleston also served as the rail gateway to points west from 1830 to 1860, and many travelers saw the landscape between Charleston and present-day North Augusta from the windows of a train. Tourists marveled at the railroad’s inclined plane and stationary steam engine near Aiken. In Columbia, visitors hoped to meet the city’s elite and tour South Carolina College, particularly its famous library. Although travel in the upstate was rarer, natural sites such as Table Rock also drew visitors.
Explanation:
hope it helps
Where did chickens come from in the Columbian exchange?
1. In the film Black Athena, Martin Bernal’s main argument was that the African and Semitic lineage of Western civilization had been scrubbed from the record of ancient Greece by 18th- and 19th-century historians steeped in the racism of their times. So,
a. How did he support his argument? Give three specific examples.
b. How did others criticize his thesis? Again, give three specific examples.
2. Do you agree with Martin Bernal’s conclusions? Why, or why not?
1. a. Martin Bernal supported his argument in "Black Athena" by providing three specific examples: 1) Linguistic evidence 2) Mythological evidence 3) Historical evidence
1) Linguistic evidence: Bernal argued that the linguistic connections between ancient Egyptian, Semitic languages, and ancient Greek were significant and indicated cultural exchanges and influences. He pointed out similarities in vocabulary, grammar, and religious terms as evidence of an African and Semitic influence on ancient Greece.
2) Mythological evidence: Bernal highlighted the presence of mythological figures and stories in ancient Greece that had parallels in Egyptian and Semitic mythologies. He argued that these similarities suggested cultural connections and exchanges between these civilizations.
3) Historical evidence: Bernal pointed out instances where ancient Greek writers acknowledged the influence of foreign cultures, including African and Semitic peoples. He argued that these references were later suppressed or downplayed by 18th- and 19th-century historians due to their racial biases.
b. Critics of Martin Bernal's thesis raised several concerns:
1) Lack of direct evidence: Some scholars criticized Bernal for relying heavily on circumstantial evidence and argued that the linguistic and mythological connections he presented did not necessarily indicate direct cultural exchanges.
2) Overemphasis on race: Critics argued that Bernal placed excessive emphasis on race and ignored other factors that could have contributed to cultural developments and influences in ancient Greece.
3) Cherry-picking evidence: Some scholars accused Bernal of selectively interpreting historical sources and cherry-picking evidence to fit his thesis, disregarding alternative explanations and interpretations.
Learn more about Egyptian : brainly.com/question/27926504
#SPJ11
HELP ASAP IM MAKING AN ESSAY!!!!!!
To what extent did the relationship between Spain and Texas change
between 1519 and 1821?
1 point
Based on the map, which American Revolution action was fought in
present-day Indiana? *
The Revolutionary War in the West, 1778-1779
American victory
British troops
American troops
Present-day
boundaries
Cahokia
(1778)
Vincennes;
(Feb. 1779)
OUNTAINS
WE
Kaskaskia
(July 1778)
S
\APPALACH
Cahokia
O Kaskasia
Vincennes
Kaskaskia (July 1778)S/APPALACH
Which section highlights the idea that
President Jackson was willing to use physical
force to get his way in politics?
A
B
"Lawyer, War Hero, President"
D
"President Jackson Often Says No"
C "Jackson Versus Second Bank"
"Rising To Tariff Challenges"
The "Jackson Versus Second Bank" highlights the idea that President Jackson was willing to use physical force to get his way in politics. Thus option (D) is correct.
Who is the President?The president of the United States is the head of State and Government of the United States. It is the highest political office in the country by influence and recognition. The president leads the executive branch of the federal government.
Among other powers and responsibilities, Article II of the Constitution of the United States entrusts to the president the "faithful execution" of the federal law, makes the president the commander-in-chief of the Armed Force.
The "Jackson Versus Second Bank" highlights the idea that President Jackson was willing to use physical force to get his way in politics. Therefore, option (D) is correct.
Learn more about the President here:
https://brainly.com/question/7465693
#SPJ1
During the Middle Ages, the use of coin money
Answer: Medieval Money & Coins
Medieval money was currency in the form of coins that came in varying qualities and weights. The other currency used was that of a promise, which was used in large-scale transactions. The most common coin throughout the middle ages was the small silver penny (pfennig) or denarius.
Explanation: hope this helps
What did the Europeans have to do at the end of each trading season?
Answer:
To sell all the goods and buy necessary items.
Explanation:
The Europeans have to sell all the goods and buy the necessary materials that is needed in the family as well as for the next trading season at the end of each trading season. The ending of trading season provides resting time for the traders to collect and produce new products for the coming new season. This period of time the traders spend their time in their houses with family and producing new items so that they can sold it in the coming trading seaason.
Why might men in the colonies have a difficult time finding someone to marry? How and when did this begin to change?
Colonial men had difficulty finding women to marry because very few women traveled to the colonies at the time of the conquest.
How did marriage work in the colonies?During colonial times, European countries sent men to discover and conquer new territories. This situation prevented these men from finding women in the colonies to be able to marry.
Later, when the colonies were already established, men could find women more easily because women had already started traveling to the colonies to make a new life in the new world. According to the above, it can be inferred that after the establishment of safe and adequate communities, men could find women to marry and form a home in the colonies.
Learn more about colony in: https://brainly.com/question/13673860
#SPJ1
how was the french and indian war different from previous wars between britian and france?
A. the war started in the colonies and spread to europpe
B. the war resulted in the loss of british land
C. the war started in europe and spread to the colonies
D. the war proved that france was a greater power
Identify and explain one problem the post WWI government of Germany faced due to the Treaty of Versailles reparations requirement. Identify and explain one of the attempts to solve the reparations issue and evaluate if that was successful or not.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
One problem that the post-World War I government of Germany faced due to the Treaty of Versailles reparations requirement was that the allies such as France and Great Britain demanded Germany to pay an insurmountable amount of money to pay for the destruction caused during the war.
One of the attempts to solve the reparations issue was the proposal of Woodrow Wilson, the United States President. He elaborated a plan that was known as the "14 Point Plan" that included feasible ideas to create a long-lasting peace in Europe and avoid another major war.
Unfortunately, the plan was successful. The European allies were not really interested in reaching a fair peace agreement. No. France and Great Britain were more interested in retribution and made Germany pay for the destruction caused during World War I.
Paper 1 Section A/B: Germany, 1890-1945: Democracy and dictatorship
Interpretation A
Interpretation B
The imposition of reparations on the Weimar
Republic. This was written by Egon Larsen, who
had been a German journalist in the 1920's.
Spoken by George Clemenceau in 1921. George
Clemenceau was President of France through the
First World War and led French negotiations over
the Treaty
As the terms of peace became known, we
came to realise what it meant to lose a
war against two dozen countries. The cost
of reparations, to be paid by a Germany
which had lost its economic power, was
shattering
Reparations to be paid by Germany were
agreed in 1921 by the League of Nations.
The sum of £6,600 million was only half
of what France had demanded. It was less
than the sum that Germany would have
demanded if they had won the war, and
Germany had until 1984 to pay off the
debt in instalments
2. Why might the authors have differing interpretations?
[4marks]
Please please please help, thankyou
The reason that the the authors have differing interpretations is based on their: viewpoints and different encounters.
What is the interpretations?Egon Larsen was a German writer who likely experienced the financial hardships and political insecurity of the Weimar Republic, and may see the burden of sanction a burden on Germany's struggling economy.
Therefore, or simply say On the other hand, George Clemenceau was the President of France amid World War I and may have seen the reparations as fundamental discipline for Germany's hostility as well as destruction.
Learn more about interpretations from
https://brainly.com/question/1556261
#SPJ1
What were the interests of Las Vegas Sands, and how does the Sands propose to meet those interests? Are there likely to be conflicts of interests within the Sands’ top management team?
The interests of Las Vegas Sands, a global casino resort company, primarily lie in expanding their operations and increasing their profits. To meet these interests, Sands has pursued a strategy of diversifying their offerings and expanding into new markets, such as Macau and Singapore.
The Sands have also invested heavily in technology and infrastructure to improve customer experience and efficiency.
There may be potential conflicts of interests within the Sands' top management team, as they may have differing opinions on how to best pursue these interests. For example, some may prioritize expanding into new markets, while others may prioritize investing in technology and innovation. However, as a publicly traded company, Las Vegas Sands is accountable to its shareholders and is ultimately guided by the overarching goal of maximizing profitability.
To learn more about Las Vegas Sands, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28883036
#SPJ11
Many ancient civilizations believed that dreams were __________. A. Meaningless brain activity B. A form of shamanistic magic C. Messages from the spirit world D. Memories from previous lives Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D.
Answer:
b) A form of shamanistic magic
Explanation:
Many ancient civilizations believed that dreams were A form of shamanistic magic. Therefore option B is correct.
What is Dream?One of the most difficult and enigmatic features of sleep is dreaming. Dreams can be glorious and blissful, but they can also be frightful, dangerous, or stressful.
Nightmares are frightening, disturbing, strange, or otherwise bothersome dreams that are excessively vivid. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, the phase of sleep linked to vivid dreaming, is when they happen more repeatedly.
When greater time is spent in REM sleep in the second half of the night, nightmares occur more frequently. It's common to be extremely aware of what occurred in the dream when you awake from a nightmare, and many people have feelings of angst or stress as a result.
Hence, Many ancient civilizations believed that dreams were A form of shamanistic magic.
To learn more about Dream follow the link.
https://brainly.com/question/1475477
#SPJ5
Abolitionism and Colonialism. about Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, and John Wesley. Then, write one paragraph (250 words) about either the perspective of Equiano, Douglass, or Wesley regarding slavery during Colonialism. Then, find a painting that was painted sometime between 1500 and 1800 that supports your position about the historical figure you chose and explain how that painting supports your opinion
Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, and John Wesley were prominent figures in the abolitionist movement who played crucial roles in challenging the institution of slavery during the era of Colonialism.
Olaudah Equiano, born in Africa and later enslaved, became a prominent abolitionist and writer. His autobiography, "The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano," vividly described the horrors of the Middle Passage and the brutalities of slavery.
In support of Equiano's perspective, a painting from that era that resonates with his stance is "The Slave Ship" by J.M.W. Turner, painted in 1840. Although this falls slightly outside the given timeframe, it effectively captures the horrors of the transatlantic slave trade that Equiano and countless others endured.
Learn more about slavery:
https://brainly.com/question/29775358
#SPJ4
Many countries that are now constitutional monarchies evolved from governments that were once considered absolute monarchies.
O True
O False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Today constitutional monarchies are mostly associated with Western European countries such as the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein, and Sweden. However, the two most populous constitutional monarchies in the world are in Asia: Japan and Thailand.
1. Why did William Lloyd Garrison (we learned about him from the Reform Era) actually want the North to secede from the country first? Do you think we would have gotten the same impact he wanted once the South seceded? Explain.
2. During the first eighteen months of the war, what was the reason that the North stated it was continuing to attack the Confederate States?
3. What was the “practical” reason that many in the North would not let the southern states peacefully leave the union?
Answer:
1. William Lloyd Garrison was a prominent abolitionist and believed that the institution of slavery was immoral and needed to be abolished immediately. He believed that the North should secede from the country first because it would send a strong message to the South that slavery was not acceptable and that the North was willing to take drastic measures to end it. Garrison believed that the South would not be able to survive without the economic support of the North, and that their secession would ultimately lead to the end of slavery. However, it is unclear whether or not the same impact would have been achieved if the South seceded first. The North may not have had the same level of moral authority if they were seen as abandoning the Union rather than taking a principled stand against slavery.
2. The North stated that it was continuing to attack the Confederate States during the first eighteen months of the war to preserve the Union. President Lincoln believed that secession was unconstitutional and that the Confederacy did not have the right to leave the Union. He felt that it was his duty as President to defend the Union and prevent the disintegration of the country. Additionally, the North wanted to weaken the Confederate army and economy in order to bring an end to the war and reunite the country.
3. The practical reason that many in the North would not let the southern states peacefully leave the Union was economic. The South was a major producer of agricultural goods such as cotton, tobacco, and sugar, and their economy relied heavily on the labor of enslaved Africans. If the South were to secede, it would result in the loss of a significant portion of the country's agricultural output, which would have a negative impact on the Northern economy. Additionally, the North had invested heavily in transportation infrastructure such as railroads and canals that linked the South to the rest of the country. If the South were to secede, this infrastructure would become useless and the North would lose a significant amount of money.
In what way were the Liberty Party and the Free-Soil Party similar?
OA. Both parties attracted small farmers and white merchants.
B. Both parties supported Martin Van Buren for president.
OC. Both parties wanted to see slavery spread to new states.
OD. Both parties were formed out of the abolition movement.
The Liberty Party and the Free-Soil Party are similar by option d: Both parties were formed out of the abolition movement.
What is the difference between the Liberty Party and the Free Soil Party?The Liberty Party is one that was said to be dedicated to slavery's abolition as well as the equal rights for everyone especially blacks.
The Free Soil party is one whose demands is for the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia and its limitation.
Therefore, The Liberty Party and the Free-Soil Party are similar by option d: Both parties were formed out of the abolition movement.
Learn more about Liberty Party from
https://brainly.com/question/6825952
#SPJ1
The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 provides for various dispute
resolution structures. Identify two of these structures and discuss
how each of them functions.
Two dispute resolution structures provided by the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 are the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and the bargaining councils.
The CCMA is an independent body designed to provide services to parties involved in disputes, such as conciliation or mediation. It can also hear certain types of disputes in arbitration – the binding decision of which is legally enforceable. Its services are free and parties can refer issues such as unfair dismissal, unfair labour practice or collective bargaining agreements to the CCMA for resolution.
Bargaining councils are formed by employers’ and trade unions’ organisations to regulate labour matters in specific industries and create applicable collective agreements. It is established by an agreement between the industry and various trade unions. Councils are tasked with solving conflicts between employers and employees, setting minimum wages, and creating a pool of information that might help anyone understand the industry trends. These councils are also in charge of enforcing collective agreements and adjudicating employee-employer disputes in the industry.
To know more about Labour Relations Act , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28214843
#SPJ4