how does international trade in America change America and affect Americans in the nineteenth century?
International trade in the nineteenth century brought both benefits and challenges to America and its people. It boosted economic growth, expanded consumer choices, and transformed cities, but also had negative impacts on certain industries and perpetuated the institution of slavery.
In the nineteenth century, international trade played a significant role in shaping America and impacting the lives of Americans.
One major change was the expansion of the American economy.
Increased trade allowed for the export of goods such as cotton, tobacco, and wheat, which stimulated economic growth and created job opportunities.
International trade also brought about the rise of port cities like New York and New Orleans, which became bustling centers of commerce.
The influx of goods from other countries also provided Americans with access to a wider range of products, enhancing their quality of life.
However, international trade also had its drawbacks.
The competition from imported goods often led to the decline of certain industries, particularly in the manufacturing sector.
Additionally, the reliance on exports made the American economy vulnerable to fluctuations in international markets.
Furthermore, the expansion of international trade contributed to the growth of the slave trade in America.
The demand for labor in cotton plantations led to the forced migration of millions of enslaved Africans, resulting in immense suffering and perpetuating racial inequality.
In conclusion, international trade in the nineteenth century brought both benefits and challenges to America and its people.
It boosted economic growth, expanded consumer choices, and transformed cities, but also had negative impacts on certain industries and perpetuated the institution of slavery.
For more questions on International trade
https://brainly.com/question/32085472
#SPJ8
What drives the need for Chinese labor in the U.S., and why do you think they are treated the way they are? What is different as opposed to European immigration?
Chinese immigrants were seen as a source of cheap labor, willing to work long hours for low pay.
What was the historical precedent?Historically, Chinese labor was brought to the U.S. in the 19th century to work on the transcontinental railroad and later in various industries such as mining, agriculture, and manufacturing.
Chinese immigrants faced discrimination and were often subjected to harsh living and working conditions.
They were denied citizenship and faced legal restrictions on owning property, marrying outside of their race, and testifying against whites in court.
The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 banned Chinese immigrants from coming to the U.S. for ten years and barred those already in the country from becoming citizens.
Read more about Chinese labor here:
https://brainly.com/question/7910008
#SPJ1
Which statement about the economic impact of hosting the 1996 Olympics in
Georgia is false?
It increased international interest in Georgia as a tourist destination.
It led to many new investments in Georgia by people from out of state.
It helped sports-equipment manufacturing become one of Georgia's chief
industries.
It led to the building of modern sports venues in Atlanta where fans could watch
local teams.
It increased international interest in Georgia as a tourist destination is the statement about the economic impact of hosting the 1996 Olympics in Georgia is false.
How much of an economic impact did the 1996 Olympics have?$1,925 million would be spent on staging the Olympic Summer Games in 1996. Nearly the same amount, $1,916 million, has been revised (Summary Table 7). Summary According to Table 7, the effect of hosting the 1996 Summer Olympics on employment was somewhat lower than what was estimated in the 1992 research.Atlanta also estimated a USD 5 billion economic benefit from hosting the Games, and in the ten years after the Games, the city saw the construction of hotels, office buildings, residential structures, and entertainment facilities totaling USD 1.8 billion.To learn more about economic impact refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/25769566
#SPJ1
When determining who wins a state's electoral votes, almost all states use a winner take all model. What does that mean? How do a state's electoral votes get
awarded
Answer:
In a winner-take-all model, the candidate who wins the most votes in a state's presidential election receives all of that state's electoral votes. Each state is allocated a certain number of electoral votes based on its population, and the total number of electoral votes is 538. To become President of the United States, a candidate must win a majority of 270 electoral votes.
For example, if a candidate wins 51% of the popular vote in California, they would receive all 55 of California's electoral votes. This means that even if a candidate wins by a very small margin, they receive all of the state's electoral votes.
The winner-take-all model is used by all but two states (Maine and Nebraska), which use a proportional allocation method. In these states, the candidate who wins the majority of the popular vote in each congressional district receives one electoral vote, and the candidate who wins the majority of the popular vote statewide receives two additional electoral votes.
Most states in the US adopt the winner-take-all paradigm, commonly referred to as the "unit rule," to decide how their electoral votes are distributed in presidential elections.
An explanation of the winner-take-all system is provided below:
Based on its population, each state is allotted a set number of electoral votes.Each state's electorate cast their votes for the presidential candidate of their choosing on Election Day.The winner of a state's electoral votes is the candidate with the most votes in that state.The president is elected by the candidate who receives 270 or more electoral votes.However, the winner-take-all method is not likely to be changed any time soon. The United States Constitution contains it, therefore changing it would need a constitutional amendment.
Learn more about Electoral, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1042279
#SPJ4
Why was Catholic art, like paintings and sculptures, destroyed during the Reformation?
Answer:
Because the leaders of the reformation believed that the Church should be austere, and according to them, Catholic art like paintings and sculptures, were a symbol of the wastefulness and greed of the Catholic Church.
Leaders of the reformation believed that Churches should have simple architecture, have very few ornamentations, and in general, serve more as gathering places for religious services, than as monumental buildings more similar to palaces or ancient temples.
Answer and Explanation:
Many of the art was destroyed during the Reformation. In the church, images were seen throughout the middle ages. Those images played a significant role in devotion. Those images were kept safe to display on special occasions. Paintings and sculptures were displayed on altars and in chapels.
The arguments of Reformers calling for the destruction of images were the same as those which caused the Iconoclastic Controversy dating from Leo III to the Second incense council.
The pilgrims did not distinguish too well between the miraculous painting inside and the stone structure outside the chapel. When the city council realized that the explosion of Jews did not bring any way of the economic benefit, it permitted the booklets of his miraculous painting. Catholic believers were considered fake and ignorant by Reformers because they manipulated the pilgrims to get their motives. According to them, reformers’ then take action to destroy their images like paintings and sculptures to depict the accurate picture of religion.
Select the correct answer from each drop down menu.
Complete the following paragraph about the Soviet union and the United States during the World War II
Compared to the Soviet Union, the United States experienced fewer civilian casualties during World War II. While the Soviet Union suffered extensive civilian losses due to the brutal nature of the conflict on its territory, the United States, being geographically distant from the major theaters of war, faced fewer direct civilian casualties.
What constitutes the Grand alliance conference?In terms of appearances at Grand alliance conferences, the United States had fewer than the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union played a significant role in the diplomatic negotiations and decision-making of the Grand alliance, attending numerous conferences such as the Tehran Conference, Yalta Conference, and Potsdam Conference. The United States, although actively involved in these conferences, had a lesser number of appearances compared to the Soviet Union.
On the other hand, the United States experienced more invasions during World War II. While the Soviet Union faced its fair share of invasions from Nazi Germany and its allies, the United States conducted several major invasions as part of its military strategy. Notable examples include the invasions of North Africa, Italy, and Normandy (D-Day), which marked significant turning points in the war.
In addition to these comparisons, the United States also had more battles on the Homefront. The country mobilized its economy and resources to support the war effort, leading to increased industrial production and significant societal changes. The war had a profound impact on American society, with rationing, war bond campaigns, and women joining the workforce in large numbers.
Furthermore, the United States suffered more military casualties than the Soviet Union. While the Soviet Union had staggering military losses due to the scale of the Eastern Front and its high casualty rates, the United States also incurred substantial losses, particularly in the Pacific theater. The island-hopping campaign against Japan's forces resulted in intense and bloody battles, such as Iwo Jima and Okinawa, where American forces suffered heavy casualties.
Lastly, the United States engaged in more battles in the Pacific theater. The Pacific War was a major focus for the United States, with its naval and air forces engaging in intense combat against the Japanese forces across a vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean. The famous battles of Midway, Guadalcanal, and Leyte Gulf were pivotal moments in the conflict, illustrating the fierce nature of the fighting in this theater.
In summary, compared to the Soviet Union during World War II, the United States experienced fewer civilian casualties, fewer appearances at Grand alliance conferences, more invasions, more battles on the Homefront, more military casualties, and more battles in the Pacific theater.
learn more about Grand alliance conference: https://brainly.com/question/29973118
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Complete the following paragraph about the Soviet Union and the United States during WWII.
Compared to the Soviet Union, the United States experienced
A- Fewer civilian casualties
B- Fewer appearances at Grand alliance conferences
C-More invasions.
And experienced
A- More battles on the Homefront
B-More military casualties
C-More battles in the Pacific theater
The divine right of kings ended in England during the
adoption of the Magna Carta.
transition of the Glorious Revolution.
writing of the Two Treatises of Government.
fighting of the Seven Years' War.
The divine prerogative of kings was most prominently practiced by King James I of England (reigned 1603-25), but it essentially vanished from English politics following the Glorious Revolution. (1688–89).
What is the divine right of kings?
The notion of royal and political legitimacy known as "divine right of kings" or "divine-right theory of kingship" is both political and theological. It states that a king derives his right to reign directly from God's will and is not subject to any earthly authority.
The divine right doctrine of royalty was broken when Parliament overthrew one monarch and installed another. The grace of Parliament, not the favor of God, made William king.
The idea of divine right holds that royalty has been granted permission from God to reign. "The State of MONARCHIE is the supreme thing upon earth," said King James I of England (reigned from 1603 to 1625). "For Kings are not only GOD'S Lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon GOD'S throne, but even by GOD himself they are called GODS."
Learn more about divine right of kings:
https://brainly.com/question/30341091
#SPJ1
How did Plutarch contribute to Hellenistic philosophy and the arts?
He was the first author to write about the use of logic and reason.
He claimed that philosophy was more important than math and science.
He wrote biographies about important historical figures and leaders.
He used philosophy to influence the decisions of government leaders.
He was first writer to discuss the use of reason and logic. He asserted that math and physics were not as significant as philosophy. He penned biographies of significant historical leaders and figures. (Option a)
What does Plutarch contribute?Almost 200 of Plutarch's books were published, although not all of them made it through antiquity. His most well-known work, aside from the Parallel Lives, is the Moralia (also Ethica), a collection of more than 60 articles on moral, theological, physical, social, and literary subjects. Plutarch seeks evidence for his view in numerous Platonic dialogues because he believes that there is only one "Platonic view" about the origins of the universe, the fundamental elements of existence, and the function of the soul in the creation of the world.
To know more about Plutarch visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21669061
#SPJ1
Select three of the following factors that would be included in a new economic indicator to replace GDP with environmental considerations.
measure of taxation
value of natural capital
measure of cost of living
value of ecosystem services
measure of economic welfare
Answer:
2,3,4
Explanation:
imperial rivalries and military buildups in 20th century europe created a situation in which
Imperial rivalries and military buildups in 20th-century Europe created a situation in which Option A. disagreements among European states could easily erupt into armed conflicts.
The early 20th century was marked by intense competition among major European powers, such as Germany, Britain, France, and Russia, for colonial territories, resources, and influence. This competition led to a sense of nationalistic pride and a desire to assert dominance over others. As these rivalries intensified, the arms race became a significant aspect of the geopolitical landscape. Each nation sought to build up its military capabilities, investing heavily in armies, navies, and advanced weaponry.
The complex web of alliances that emerged further exacerbated the situation. Countries formed alliances to protect their interests and secure support in case of conflict, but these alliances also created a delicate balance of power. The formation of opposing alliances, such as the Triple Entente (France, Russia, and Britain) and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy), meant that a localized dispute between two countries could quickly escalate into a full-scale war involving multiple nations.
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in 1914, which served as the catalyst for World War I, highlighted the fragility of the situation. The underlying imperial rivalries, combined with military buildups and the interconnected system of alliances, made any incident or disagreement susceptible to triggering a larger conflict.
In conclusion, the imperial rivalries and military buildups of 20th-century Europe created an environment in which disagreements among European states could easily escalate into armed conflicts. The combination of nationalistic aspirations, the arms race, and the intricate network of alliances set the stage for the outbreak of World War I and the subsequent devastation that followed. Therefore, Option A is Correct.
The question was Incomplete, Find the full content below:
Imperial rivalries and military buildups in 20th-century Europe created a situation in which:
A. disagreements among European states could easily erupt into armed conflicts.
B. small countries tried to become part of large empires for their own protection.
C. republican governments in Europe were overthrown by military dictators.
D. European countries were unwilling to form military alliances with their neighbors.
Know more about European powers here:
https://brainly.com/question/30942709
#SPJ8
As restrictions and prohibitions are multiplied in the Empire, the people grow poorer and poorer. When the
people are subjected to overmuch government, the land is thrown into confusion. ... The greater the numb-
of laws and enactments, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
What were Lao-Tzu's views on government?
Lao-Tzu's views on government emphasized the negative consequences of excessive governance, such as increased poverty, societal disorder, and the proliferation of criminal behavior.
Lao-Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher, and founder of Taoism, advocated for a minimalistic approach to governance. His views centered around the idea that an overly intrusive government, characterized by excessive restrictions, prohibitions, and an abundance of laws and enactments, had detrimental effects on society. Lao-Tzu believed that when the government imposed too many regulations and intervened excessively in people's lives, it led to the impoverishment of the population and the disruption of social harmony. He argued that a heavy-handed government created a climate of confusion and disorder, fostering an environment conducive to criminal activities.
Lao-Tzu's philosophy suggested that a wise ruler should govern with minimal interference, allowing individuals to live by the natural order of things. He believed in the importance of non-action (wu-wei) and the cultivation of inner virtue rather than relying on external regulations and control. Lao-Tzu's emphasis on a less intrusive government and the negative consequences of excessive governance resonated with the Taoist principles of simplicity, spontaneity, and harmony with nature.
For more questions on Lao-Tzu's
https://brainly.com/question/28300061
#SPJ8
In which of the following US cities were major immigration stations located?
Answer:
Major immigration stations were located in the US cities of: San Francisco and New York.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Major immigration stations of US are situated in The Angel Island station near San Francisco and Ellis Island station near New York.
What is Immigration?
Immigration is the international movement of people to a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do not possess citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens.
In simple words, the process of coming of people to live permanently in a country that is not their own.
What is Immigration Station?
A place at which new immigrants to a country are processed and evaluated by an authority appointed by the recipient government.
immigration station means any place designated by the Minister for the examination, treatment or detention of persons for any purpose under this Act, and includes immigration quarters at ports of entry.
Hence, San Francisco and New York is major US cities with immigration station.
To learn more about US immigration station, here is the link
https://brainly.com/question/9780953
#SPJ2
Which statements show a Hebrew belief?
Select all correct answers. A:God does not have any expectations of people.
B:God knows all things.
C:God is fair and just and cares deeply for people.
Answer:
It would be B and C.
Explanation:
Read The bible.
Answer:
I took the test
Explanation:
What factors conspired to propel the United States to emerge as a military and economic powerhouse prior to World War I?
base on my research
hope it helps:)
What elements made it different from other city riots? (paragraph 3
Answer:
Explanation:
The 1992 Los Angeles riots, also known as the Rodney King riots, were different from other city riots in several ways:
Triggering event: The riots were sparked by the acquittal of four LAPD police officers on charges of excessive force in the beating of Rodney King, a Black man who had been pulled over for a traffic violation. The incident was captured on video and widely circulated, sparking outrage and protests.
Size and scope: The riots were some of the largest and most violent in U.S. history, with over 50 people killed, thousands injured, and more than $1 billion in property damage. The riots spread across much of Los Angeles and lasted for several days.
Racial tensions: The riots were fueled by longstanding racial tensions in Los Angeles, particularly between the Black community and the police department. The acquittal of the police officers was seen as a symbol of injustice and police brutality against Black people.
Civil unrest: The riots were also seen as a form of civil unrest, with many residents of Los Angeles feeling marginalized and ignored by the political and economic system. The riots were seen as a way to express frustration and anger about systemic inequalities and injustices.
Overall, the 1992 Los Angeles riots were different from other city riots in their scale, their triggering event, their racial tensions, and their expression of civil unrest. The riots were a stark reminder of the deep-seated inequalities and injustices that continue to plague American society, particularly with regard to race and policing.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Upload your project, "Christianity, Individualism, and Secularism," below.
Despite being two different concepts, secularism and individualism have a lot in common. They are both related to keeping church and life apart.
Government and the individual are separated by secularism, which encourages individuals to focus more on what is relevant to their daily lives than what the Bible says.
What is Christianity?According to Jesus of Nazareth's life and teachings, Christianity is an Abrahamic monotheistic religion. With almost 2.38 billion adherents, or one-third of the world's population, it is the biggest and most pervasive religion.
The majority of its followers, known as Christians, are thought to live in 157 nations and territories and hold to the belief that Jesus is the Son of God, whose advent as the messiah was foretold in the Hebrew Bible (known in Christianity as the Old Testament) and recorded in the New Testament.
Learn more about Christianity, from:
brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ1
13) After Germany invaded Poland, in 1939, America declared war on them. true or false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The Americans did not enter the war until after the attack on pearl harbor
Answer:
that is false
Explanation:
because America declared war after Germany sunk a submarine
Did the colonists of the Thirteen Colonies believe they were full citizens of * 4 points
England, or did they believe they were separate? Describe their thoughts
and beliefs. Use specific details.
Minimum of 3 sentences
Answer: The American colonists thought of themselves as citizens of Great Britain and subjects of King George III.
Explanation: They were tied to Britain through trade and by the way they were governed. Trade was restricted so the colonies had to rely on Britain for imported goods and supplies.
can you draw any similarities or differences from the civil war period to life in 2020?
Answer:
yes yes you can
Explanation:
1. We have ambulances and hospitals.
The Civil War began during medieval medicine's last gasp and ended at the dawn of modern medicine. Each side entered the war with puny squads of physicians trained by textbook, if at all. Four years later, legions of field-tested doctors, well-versed in anatomy, anesthesia and surgical practice, were poised to make great medical leaps.
The nation's first ambulance corps, organized to rush wounded soldiers to battlefront hospitals and using wagons developed and deployed for that purpose, was created during the Civil War. The idea was to collect wounded soldiers from the field, take them to a dressing station and then transport them to the field hospital.
Doctors laid out the hospitals as camps divided into well-defined wards for specific activities such as surgery and convalescence. Women flocked to serve these hospitals as nurses.
Before the war, most people received health care at home. After the war, hospitals adapted from the battlefront model cropped up all over the country. The ambulance and nurses' corps became fixtures, with the Civil War's most famous nurse, Clara Barton, going on to establish the American Red Cross. Today's modern hospital is a direct descendant of these first medical centers.
2. We prize America as a land of opportunity.
The Civil War paved the way for Americans to live, learn and move about in ways that had seemed all but inconceivable just a few years earlier. With these doors of opportunity open, the United States experienced rapid economic growth. Immigrants also began seeing the fast-growing nation as a land of opportunity and began coming here in record numbers.
For many years Southern lawmakers had blocked the passage of land-grant legislation. But they weren't around after secession, and in 1862 Congress passed a series of land-grant measures that would forever change America's political, economic and physical landscape:
The First Transcontinental Railroad. Also known as the "Pacific Railroad," the world's first transcontinental line, built between 1863 and 1869, was at least partly intended to bind California to the Union during the Civil War. To build the line, the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads were granted 400-foot rights-of-way plus 10 square miles of government-owned land for every mile of track built.
Homesteading in the West. The Homestead Act, enacted in 1862, provided that any adult citizen (or intended citizen who had never borne arms against the U.S. government) could be granted 160 acres of surveyed government land after living on it — and making improvements to it — for five years. After the Civil War, Union soldiers could deduct the time they had served from the residency requirement.
The land-grant college system. The Morrill Land Grant Act authorized the sale of public lands in every state to underwrite the establishment of colleges dedicated to the "agricultural and mechanical arts." It also required the teaching of military tactics. In time, the new law would give rise to such institutions of higher learning as Michigan State, Texas A&M and Virginia Tech.
The same year brought another innovation — a national paper currency — that would literally bankroll the rapidly expanding government and at the same time grease the wheels of commerce from coast to coast. In 1862, with the Union's expenses mounting, the government had no way to continue paying for the war. "Immediate action is of great importance," Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase told Congress. "The treasury is nearly empty." The solution: treasury notes bearing no interest and printed on the best banking paper, as proposed to President Abraham Lincoln by Col. Edmund D. Taylor, who would later became known as "the father of the greenback."
Memorial Day ceremony in Arlington, Virginia, on Monday, May 31, 2010.
NIKKI KAHN/THE WASHINGTON POST/GETTY IMAGES
U.S. Army soldiers file past the amphitheater at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day 2010.
1. Which was not a right of Athenian citizens? a. the right to vote b. the right to own property c. the right to serve on a jury d. the right to hold a position in government
Answer: your answer is d
Explanation:
Answer:
a
Explanation:
i got it wrong
PLEASEEE ANSWER D:
List all groups who were permitted to vote in colonial elections?
Answer:
Only white male property owners or taxpayers, were allowed to vote in those times (1700s). And to specify, their property had to be worth 50 pounds or about (67. 73 USD).
Hope this answered your question :)
By the way, I'm almost to the next rank, if you like my answer can you mark me brainliest please?
Which statement does Jefferson make in his 1801 inaugural address about the election of 1800?
___________
(answer correctly, please. I will give brainly if you're correct)
___________
1. He believed that the election process needed to be reformed.
2. He was pleased that a vast majority of the nation voted for him.
3. He pointed out that the election was fair and constitutional.
4. He was surprised to win the election.
Answer:
He pointed out that the election was fair and constitutional
Explanation:
As the first peaceful transition of political power between opposing parties in U.S. history, however, the election of 1800 had far-reaching significance. Jefferson appreciated the momentous change and his inaugural address called for reconciliation by declaring that, "We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists."
Answer:
1
Explanation:
bc of taxes
what did the tet offensive prove about the Vietnam war
Answer:
The Tet Offensive played an important role in weakening U.S. public support for the war in Vietnam. (some name I can't type because brainly wont allow me to publish this answer with it) and leaders in Hanoi planned the Tet Offensive in the hopes of achieving a decisive victory that would end the grinding conflict that frustrated military leaders on both sides.
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
In what ways was the Dutch Republic a haven of religious toleration? Select all that apply.
Significant numbers of radical Protestant groups, such as the Anabaptists, lived in the Netherlands.
Jews were permitted to join guilds.
It sheltered Jews who had fled from persecution in Spain and Portugal.
Many Huguenots left France for the safety of the Dutch provinces.
It allowed Catholics to practice their faith without restriction.
" The Dutch Republic was a heaven of religious toleration because"-
"Significant numbers of radical Protestant groups, such as the Anabaptists, lived in the Netherlands.""It sheltered Jews who had fled from persecution in Spain and Portugal.""Many Huguenots left France for the safety of the Dutch provinces.""During the 17th century, Dutch was popular for its extreme religious tolerance. The Netherlands had attained freedom from Spain and they opted to ensure some tolerance to the people of other minority religions also. They permitted Protestants and Jews , the religious protester from other countries. The "Reformed Dutch Church" was the state- recognized religion in New Amsterdam, the Dutch did not forced or oppressed other religions. "
To learn more about Protestants,
https://brainly.com/question/14755996
#SPJ1
3 minutes
500 feet
15 minutes
5000 feet
U.S.A.C
Rhein-Main
Berlin
This cross-sectional diagram of a major operation ordered by President Harry S. Truman in
1948. The Flight pattern illustrated in the diagram was designed to allow an airplane to land
every three minutes. Why was this operation undertaken?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
they did this to provide a supplies for a blockaded city
you’re welcome now sC: dritydrops
Match these items. Match the items in the left column to the items in the right column.
1. animated
2. expressionistic
3. lancet
4. lyricism
full of life
characterized by emotion,
subjectivity, and imagination.
from Expressionism, a style that
often has an emotional dimension
long, narrow window with pointed
head
animated: brimming with life Expressionistic works are marked by subjectivity, emotion, and imagination. a long, thin window with a pointed head is a lancet. lyricism, which derives from expressionism, a genre that frequently includes an emotional component
Early in the 20th century, particularly in Germany, the aesthetic and literary movement known as expressionism began. It is distinguished by a concentration on irrational feelings, interior experiences, and the portrayal of the artist's unique perspective and perception of the universe.
Artists frequently exaggerate or distort shapes, colors, and perspectives in expressionistic works to depict strong emotion and psychological states. In place of objective and symbolic images, the movement rejects naturalistic depiction.
Expressionist artwork tries to elicit an emotional reaction from the viewer, such as sensations of dread, amazement, anxiety, or angst.
Learn more about Expressionism, from :
brainly.com/question/32284672
#SPJ1
what are the implications of Skinners views on behaviours modification in a South African context
Answer:
B.F. Skinner was a prominent psychologist who is known for his work on behaviorism and behavior modification. Skinner believed that behavior could be modified through positive and negative reinforcement, and he advocated for the use of behavior modification techniques in a variety of contexts.
In a South African context, Skinner's views on behavior modification could have both positive and negative implications. On the positive side, behavior modification techniques could be used to promote positive behaviors and discourage negative behaviors, particularly in the context of social and cultural change. For example, behavior modification techniques could be used to discourage discriminatory attitudes and behaviors, and to promote more inclusive and equitable social norms.
However, there are also potential negative implications of Skinner's views on behavior modification, particularly in the context of South Africa's history of apartheid and racial segregation. The use of behavior modification techniques could be seen as a way of controlling or manipulating individuals, particularly those who are already marginalized or disadvantaged. Additionally, there may be concerns about the potential for abuse or misuse of behavior modification techniques, particularly if they are used without the consent or understanding of those being modified.
Overall, the implications of Skinner's views on behavior modification in a South African context depend on the specific context and how these techniques are implemented. While behavior modification techniques may have some potential benefits, it is important to consider the potential risks and unintended consequences as well, particularly in the context of social and cultural change in a post-apartheid society.
How is the US Congress similar to the Assembly of Athens?
Answer:
they both make law and vote .
Which song asks members of older generation not to criticize what they can’t understand
Answer:
"The Times They Are A-Changin'"
Explanation:
Compare Mesoamerica to Indus River Valley in terms of politics, laws, and government
Answer:
The Indus River Valley Civilization, 3300-1300 BCE, also known as the Harappan Civilization, extended from modern-day northeast Afghanistan to Pakistan and northwest India.
Important innovations of this civilization include standardized weights and measures, seal carving, and metallurgy with copper, bronze, lead, and tin.
Little is understood about the Indus script, and as a result, little is known about the Indus River Valley Civilization’s institutions and systems of governance.
The civilization likely ended due to climate change and migration.