Prior to the Industrial Revolution, the primary English law of employment was that, in theabsence of a contract, a worker was hired for a year at a time.TrueFalse

A federal system refers to a system of government where power is divided between the central government and constituent political units, usually called states. It is a type of government structure where power and authority are shared among several levels of government.

The central government has powers over certain areas, while the states have powers over others. Some of the characteristics of a federal system include:1. Division of power: In a federal system, power is divided between the central government and constituent political units or states.

The central government has specific powers, while the states have specific powers.2. Dual sovereignty: There are two sovereign powers in a federal system, the central government and the states. Both have the power to make laws, enforce laws, and levy taxes.

3. Written constitution: A federal system is governed by a written constitution that spells out the powers of each level of government.4. Supreme court: The Supreme Court is the final authority in a federal system and has the power to interpret the constitution and decide cases that involve conflicts between the central government and the states.

5. Local autonomy: In a federal system, the constituent political units or states have a certain degree of autonomy. They have their own government structure, powers, and laws.6. Protection of minorities: Federal systems are designed to protect the interests of minorities by ensuring that power is not concentrated in the hands of the central government.

To know more about federal system, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13038482#

#SPJ11

Answer:

if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.

Explanation:

Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.

The following additional facts, if true, would be most helpful to the homeowner's case homeowner needs to establish OPEN hostile possession of the property... so she could tell the neighbor about her ownership of the lot.

A person may assert a property right in land that is the property of another under the legal theory known as adverse possession. Continuous use of a private road or driveway or agricultural development on an undeveloped plot of land are typical examples of adverse occupation.

Deed of Warranty: A warranty deed is the most typical document used to transfer property (sometimes called a "grant deed"). A warranty deed specifically guarantees to the new owner that the grantor/seller has good title to the property while transferring ownership.

To Know more about ownership

https://brainly.com/question/14480423

#SPJ1

Answer:

itz a case...

Explanation:

Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.

“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’

Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.

Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.

He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”

Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.

A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.

“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”

He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.

Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.

DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.

Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”

As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer & Explanation:

Case 1: No. The child's blood type is O, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and O. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.

Case 2: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents.

Case 3: No. The child's blood type is B, which cannot be produced from the combination of two B parents. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.

Case 4: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of O and O blood types from the parents.

Case 5: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and A blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A or AB.

Case 6: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of O and O blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A, B, or AB.

Case 7: Yes. The child's blood type is A, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents. The genetic make-up for the child in question would be AO, which can be produced from the combination of AB and B blood types from the parents.

Three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defense in a court of law include:

A person is still responsible for their actions, even if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the crime. Intoxication can be used as a way to escape responsibility for committing a crime, which is not fair to the victim or society as a whole.

The presence of intent or premeditation, which are crucial elements in establishing the seriousness of a crime, is not always disproved by intoxication.

Find out more on intoxication at https://brainly.com/question/30279443

#SPJ1

Answer:

Hope this helps (O) _ (O)

Explanation:

Economics This lesson identifies the key princi- ples that guide economic analysis. It introduces students to the basic economic problems of scarce resources, unlimited wants, the need to choose among alternatives, the consequences of cost, and the importance of incen- tives. While noting that nothing of value is free, the les- son explains how voluntary trade helps to provide more goods and services. While today is important, people are forward-looking in the decisions they make.

Reasoning Economic reasoning proceeds from basic assumptions about human activity. This lesson introduces students to these basic assumptions and uses them to model economic reasoning about an issue. It shows students how to apply the assumptions in the case of what seems to be a mystery: Why would people who admire a trim, slender appearance in others choose to eat too much and be inactive?

The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.

The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.

While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.

To learn more about vote visit:

https://brainly.in/question/20481185

#SPJ13

Answer:

Well if we didn't have them we would be screwed!!

The statement "Notary public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary" is true.

A notarial certificate is an official document issued by a notary public that certifies that the signer of a document has been properly identified and has signed the document voluntarily. The notary public's signature and seal are affixed to the notarial certificate, which serves as evidence that the notary's statements and signatures are genuine and have been executed correctly.

Notary public shall not complete a notarial certificate on any instrument that influences a person to enter, or not to enter a lawful transaction involving a notary, especially if the instrument contains deceptive information. When a notary is aware that a document is fraudulent, the notary should refuse to notarize it.

To know more about Notary public visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28204126

#SPJ11

Answer:

red is a union official

Explanation:

that one is true

Answer:

Explanation:

Jotes’ Lanhamn Act and State

4. Endorsements of Olympic athletes allow the ability of that particular company to advertise using

images of the Olympic flame.

prp.

v. Jurch Publishing, Inc

bserved:

5. The broadcast of the NCAA Men’s Basketball tournament and the Final Four championship is

copyrightable and only the owners of the copyright are allowed to have access.

6. Players generally have copyright ownership of their individual play, because they are the “author of

the work” — without their performance on the field there wouldn’t be a game to broadcast. DF

A Proposition of Policy Speech makes a persuasive argument about a course of action regarding a controversial topic of social or public concern.

While the proposition is based on some value premise, the focus of the discussion is not necessarily on this underlying premise, but more on the desirability and ability to act.

Policies are a set of general guidelines. They outline your organization's plan for tackling certain issues. The purpose of policies is to communicate an organization’s values, philosophy, and culture.

The term may apply to government, public sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals, Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law.

Learn more about Policies here,

https://brainly.com/question/3521988

#SPJ1

Answer:

1A.  What is business ethics, and why is it important? Ethics is the study of what constitutes right or wrong behavior—the fairness, justness, rightness, or wrongness of an action. Business ethics focuses on what constitutes ethical behavior in the world of business. An understanding of business ethics is important to the long-run viability of a business firm and to the well being of the firm’s officers, managers, and employees. A business firm also owes duties to a variety of “stakeholders” whom the firm’s decisions and activities may affect significantly.

2A.  How do duty-based ethical standards differ from outcome-based ethical standards? Duty-based ethical standards are derived from religious precepts or philosophical principles. Outcome-based ethics focus on the consequences of an action, not on the nature of the action or on a set of pre-established moral values or religious beliefs.

3A.  What are five steps that a business person can take to evaluate whether his or her actions are ethical? The first step is inquiry, the business decision maker must understand the problem, identify the parties involved and collect the relevant facts. Step 2 is to list the possible actions and goals, and discuss and evaluate the ethical principles of each option. The third step is to make a decision or adopt a plan of action. The fourth step is to articulate or document the reasoning (justification) underlying the decision.  Once the decision has been made and implemented, step 5 is to evaluate the solution to determine if it was effective.  This final step guides the businessperson when making future ethical decisions.  

4A.  How can business leaders encourage their companies to act ethically? Ethical leadership is important to create and maintain an ethical workplace. Managers can set standards, and apply those standards to themselves and their firm’s employees.

5A.  What types of ethical issues might arise in the context of international business transactions? The most common types of issues to arise in an international context are those created by the different ethical standards and practices among different cultures and nations. These may include employment policies, the treatment of women and minorities, and (less likely) situations involving bribes.

Explanation:

hope this helps a litttle

Federal judges are protected from political pressures by the great job security they receive by life appointment.

According to Hamilton, the judiciary would be more independent and firm if judges had lifetime appointments. Hamilton thought that the judiciary was the bastion of public justice and security, and that life tenure had an inherent impact on how the judiciary operated.

The Founders' true purpose has been surpassed by contemporary politics and life expectancy, according to many who contend that term restrictions for federal judges should be implemented.

The main goal of lifetime appointments is to guarantee the integrity of the authority given to court justices and shield them from inappropriate intervention from the legislative or executive branches.

To learn more about lifetime appointments refer here

https://brainly.com/question/18261057#

#SPJ4

Answer:

yes I agree

Explanation:

very smart very intelligent

The segregation or discriminatory practices that occur even when there is no such explicit legal enforcement, such as school segregation in much of the Americas today, is called that de facto segregation. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The concept of de facto segregation can be taken into the sense of general understanding as the aspect of law wherein the segregation in laws is made in order to ensure that the supremacy of law is maintained. In addition to this, a de facto segregation law does not explicitly require the sanction of legal enforcement.

Learn more about de facto segregation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13434823

#SPJ4

Labor unions have a long history that dates to the late 1700s. Workers were rarely able to improve their pay or working conditions without strong leadership. But as capable leaders started to appear, labor grew into a force that pressed for acceptance by industry and the government. The labor movement underwent gradual change, but thanks to the efforts of some progressive union leaders, significant progress was eventually made.

Thus this is the evolution of the legal status of American Unions.

To learn more about American Unions, refer: https://brainly.com/question/2025366

#SPJ9

Labor unions have a long history that dates to the late 1700s. Workers were rarely able to improve their pay or working conditions without strong leadership. But as capable leaders started to appear, labor grew into a force that pressed for acceptance by industry and the government. The labor movement underwent a gradual change, but thanks to the efforts of some progressive union leaders, significant progress was eventually made.

Early organized labor was frequently suppressed by legislation and judicial rulings and received no support from the government. According to the "conspiracy doctrine" of the late 1700s, the majority of collective activities are unlawful because they go against the interests of the general public.

In the early 1800s, organized trade and industry labor had little success in securing better pay and working conditions, as noted by Fossum (2012), but courts continued to obstruct the majority of collective endeavors.

Thus this is the evolution of the legal status of American Unions.

To learn more about American Unions, refer: brainly.com/question/2025366

#SPJ9

The list of Gary Ridgway's spouses include Claudia Kraig; Marcia Winslow, and Judith Mawson.

Gary Ridgway has been highly remembered for being a serial killer from the United States. Apart from being a serial killer, Ridgway was also known for having married to as many as thrice during the span of his life. His first marriage took place in 1972, followed by the second and third in the years 1988 and 2001, respectively. The names of his three spouses have already been mentioned in chronological order.

Learn more about Gary Ridgway here:

https://brainly.com/question/30399292

#SPJ4

Complete question

Who were Gary Ridgway's spouses?

The President of the United States gets their powers from the United States Constitution, specifically from Article II of the Constitution.

The President is the head of the executive branch of the federal government and is responsible for enforcing federal laws, conducting foreign policy, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

Some of the powers granted to the President by the Constitution include the power to veto legislation passed by Congress, the power to appoint federal judges and other officials with the advice and consent of the Senate, the power to make treaties with foreign governments with the advice and consent of the Senate, and the power to grant pardons and reprieves for federal crimes. The President is also required by the Constitution to give an annual State of the Union address to Congress.

For such more question on Constitution

https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4

It is true that a promise by one party to pay another for refraining from an action that one has a legal right to undertake is enforceable.

When a promisor makes a promise to a promisee who later relies on that promise to his detriment, the promise is legally enforceable even though it was made without formal consideration, according to the legal principle known as promissory estoppel. The goal of promisory estoppel is to prevent the promisor from arguing that a subordinate promise shouldn't be upheld or enforced by the law.

Although the exact legal conditions for promissory estoppel vary not just between countries but also between distinct jurisdictions, such as states, within a single country, the theory is recognised by law in the United States and other nations.

To know more about refraining:

https://brainly.com/question/4474781

#SPJ4

A way that can be used to refer to the fact that a person had guilty mind when they committed a crime is from the fact that they knew the implication of the thing that they have done.

Mens rea, or "guilty mind," is the mental component of an individual's intention to commit a crime or knowledge that an individual's action or inaction will result in a criminal being committed. It is a need for numerous crimes. A crime is made up of the mens rea and actus reus.

Components of Crime

Every crime normally consists of three components: the act or conduct (actus reus); the person's mental state at the moment of the act; and the causation between the act and the effect (typically either proximate causation or but-for causation). Hence we would say that the guilty mind exists because of the known implication of the actions.

Read more on crime here: https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ1

The correct options required of states that do not have OSHA-approved job safety and health plans are A, B and D.

A. They are required to meet basic workplace safety protocol.

B. They are required to have emergency management plans and workplace safety protocol.

D. They are required to meet federal OSH laws and standards.

To stop workers from being murdered or suffering other types of injury at work, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) was established. Companies are obligated by law to provide safe working conditions for their employees. 29 state plans that have received OSHA approval are now running state-wide health and safety at work initiatives. Regulations and enforcement programs for State Plans must be at least as effective as those for OSHA, while they may have additional or more strict criteria. The correct options are A, B and D.

A safe and healthy workplace free from severe known threats is something that employers are required to offer. This is sometimes referred to as the OSH Act's General Duty Clause. Numerous OSHA regulations specify several ways that companies must educate their staff, including warning signs, color-coding, signals, and training. The correct options are A, B and D.

Learn more about OSHA here:

https://brainly.com/question/13591663

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The National Police Commission abbreviated as NAPOLCOM, is an attached agency of the Department of the Interior and Local Government responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine National Police (PNP).6975 and 8551 to administer and control the Philippine National Police, the DILG “ for the purpose of effectively discharging the functions prescribe in the  "To exercise administrative control and operational supervision over the PNP.

plz mark as brainliest