Read the excerpt from cristina garciaâ€™s dreaming in cuban. my mother says that abuela celiaâ€™s had plenty of chances to leave cuba but that sheâ€™s stubborn and got her head turned around by el lÃder. mom says â€œcommunistâ€ the way some people says â€œcancer,â€ low and fierce. which element from this excerpt best characterizes garciaâ€™s story as one of magic realism? a. linking the words â€œcommunistâ€ and â€œcancerâ€ b. presenting the idea of leaving cuba as an extraordinary event c.using el lÃder as an additional narrator from cubad. connecting celia with latin american history

Answers

Answer 1

Linking the words “communist” and “cancer” element from this excerpt best characterizes Garcia’s story as one of magic realism. Option A is the correct option.

Magic realism is a genre of literature that incorporates elements of magical or mythical elements into a realist setting. In this excerpt, Garcia’s character's mother links “communist” and “cancer,” which suggests that there is something sinister or dark about communism and implies that it is linked to an illness or a force that cannot be cured or escaped. This use of magical realism to convey a sense of dread and unease is a distinctive feature of Garcia's work.

The mother said, “Communism is like a cancer. It might not hurt you right away, but it slowly takes over and corrupts you from the inside. It’s a disease that needs to be stopped.”

To learn more about communist link is here:

brainly.com/question/23716206

#SPJ4

The complete question is :

Read the excerpt from Cristina Garcia’s Dreaming in Cuban.

My mother says that Abuela Celia’s had plenty of chances to leave Cuba but that she’s stubborn and got her head turned around by El Líder. Mom says “Communist” the way some people says “cancer,” low and fierce. Which element from this excerpt best characterizes Garcia’s story as one of magic realism?

A) linking the words “communist” and “cancer”

B) presenting the idea of leaving Cuba as an extraordinary event

C) using El Líder as an additional narrator from Cuba

D) connecting Celia with Latin American history

Related Questions

a written outline of a thoughtful and planned course of research is known as

Answers

A written outline of a thoughtful and planned course of research is known as a research proposal, which is a document that provides a comprehensive overview of a proposed research project.

Thus, the research proposal outlines the research objectives, research questions or hypotheses, methodology, data collection and analysis methods, timeline, and potential outcomes.

It serves as a roadmap for conducting the research, demonstrating the researcher's understanding of the subject, the significance of the study, and the approach they will take to address the research problem. A well-crafted research proposal helps to ensure that the research is well-organized, focused, and ethically sound, while also providing a basis for seeking funding and gaining necessary approvals.

Learn more about the research proposal here:

https://brainly.com/question/14706409

#SPJ1

60 points.

Who says the following and why?

"Well I've got a knock-out blow in store for him—
I'll batter the tramp with both fists, crack every tooth
from his jaws, I'll litter the ground with teeth
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Belt up—so the lords can see us fight it out.
How can you beat a champion half your age?"

Amphinomus is preparing to battle Odysseus.
Antinous is about to attack the beggar Odysseus.
Irus is challenging the beggar Odysseus to a fight.
Telemachus is challenging Antinous for throwing a stool at the beggar Odysseus.

Answers

Answer:

Is this from the odyssey?

Explanation:

Answer:

Antinous is about to attack the beggar Odysseus.

Explanation:

This statement is said by Antinous, one of the suitors who wants Penelope's hand in marriage. He is at Odysseus' house, while Odysseus is disguised as a beggar. Antinous is a mean-spirited, rude person and he tries to attack the beggar, which is what motivates him to say these words.

How does Mr. Wilson’s belief in Philip’s story provoke a decision? a. Mr. Wilson thinks sending Philip to a diamond buyer is the right thing to do. b. Mr. Wilson decides he will find out more about where the pebble came from. c. Mr. Wilson realizes he should call the police at a later time. d. Mr. Wilson offers to polish the diamond to help out Philip.

Answers

Wilson is a detective who is hired by the Washington family to investigate Philip's claim, and his skepticism turns into belief as Philip reveals the diamond to him. Mr. Wilson's decision is to find out more about where the diamond came from, which is option B.

This decision is prompted by Mr. Wilson's realization that the diamond is worth an unimaginable amount of money, and that it could not have come from any legal source. His moral compass leads him to the conclusion that he cannot simply let the Washington family keep the diamond, as it was obtained illegally. He knows that he must investigate the diamond's origin and find a way to return it to its rightful owner.

Mr. Wilson's decision is a turning point in the story, as it sets the stage for the unraveling of the Washington family's secrets and ultimately leads to their downfall. It is a reminder of the power of morality and the importance of doing what is right, even in the face of great temptation.

Therefore, correct option is B.

know more about skepticism here

https://brainly.com/question/12560960#

#SPJ11

In this selection, what specifically is Lilienfeld critiquing? Why? How does he seek to limit the scope of his critique? In other words, what does he do as a writer to help readers understand what he is and is not claiming? Consider specific statements he makes as well as where and how often he makes them.

Answers

In this selection, Lilienfeld specifically critiques the overuse and misuse of the term "psychopathology" in contemporary psychology and psychiatry. He argues that the term has become overly broad and encompasses a wide range of behaviors and conditions, leading to diagnostic inflation and pathologizing normal variations in human behavior. Lilienfeld seeks to limit the scope of his critique by clarifying that he is not questioning the existence or significance of mental disorders but rather the tendency to label an increasing number of behaviors as pathological. He emphasizes the need for a more precise and cautious approach to diagnosis and urges researchers and clinicians to be mindful of the potential consequences of overdiagnosis and excessive pathologizing.

Scott O. Lilienfeld's critique focuses on the usage of the term "psychopathology" in contemporary psychology and psychiatry. Here is a step-by-step explanation of his specific critique and how he limits the scope of his argument:

Lilienfeld critiques the overuse and misuse of the term "psychopathology." He argues that the concept has expanded to encompass an extensive array of behaviors, conditions, and diagnoses, which can lead to diagnostic inflation and the pathologization of normal human behavior.He seeks to limit the scope of his critique by clearly stating that he is not questioning the existence or significance of mental disorders. Instead, he aims to shed light on the potential consequences of an increasingly expansive understanding of psychopathology.Lilienfeld emphasizes the need for precision and caution in diagnosis. He encourages researchers and clinicians to be mindful of the potential negative effects of overdiagnosis and the tendency to label a wide range of behaviors as pathological.Throughout the selection, Lilienfeld makes specific statements to clarify his position and address potential misconceptions. For example, he states, "I am not questioning the reality of psychopathology. On the contrary, I believe that psychopathology is all too real."Lilienfeld repeatedly acknowledges the complexity of the topic and the challenges associated with drawing clear boundaries between normal and pathological behavior. He acknowledges that some behaviors and conditions do indeed warrant clinical attention and intervention.By highlighting the potential consequences of diagnostic inflation and the pathologization of normal behavior, Lilienfeld aims to prompt critical thinking and a more nuanced approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology.

In summary, Lilienfeld specifically critiques the overuse and misuse of the term "psychopathology" in contemporary psychology and psychiatry. He seeks to limit the scope of his critique by clarifying that he is not questioning the reality of mental disorders but rather the broadening and imprecise application of the term. Through specific statements and careful acknowledgment of complexities, Lilienfeld encourages a more cautious and thoughtful approach to diagnosing and classifying psychopathology.

To learn more about Psychopathology: https://brainly.com/question/6947486

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Read this paragraph describing what happened after the English Civil War and complete the sentences.
The group that formally abolished the monarchy was the ____. After the monarchy was abolished, the ______ was created. It was led by ______, who later took the title Lord Protector. This leader was a ______, meaning that he supported removing Catholic rituals from the Church of England.

Answers

Answer:

Rump ParliamentCommonwealth of EnglandOliver CromwellPuritan

Explanation:

The group that formally abolished the monarchy was the Rump parliament. After the monarchy was abolished, the Commonwealth of England was created. It was led by Oliver Cromwell, who later took the title, Lord Protector. This leader was a Puritan, meaning that he supported removing Catholic rituals from the Church of England.

Answer:

1. Rump parliament

2. English commonwealth

3.Oliver Cromwell

4.Puritan

Explanation:

The group that formally abolished the monarchy was the Rump parliament. After the monarchy was abolished, the English commonwealth was created. It was led by Oliver Cromwell, who later took the title, Lord Protector. This leader was a Puritan, meaning that he supported removing Catholic rituals from the Church of England.

What does the passage tell you about Rukmani’s character?

Answers

What this passage says about Rukmani’s character is:

Rukmani values her freedom and her close connection with nature.

What was Rukmani's Character?

The text shows that Rukmani valued nature. Her description of the cool breze and other elements of nature prove this.

A person who is in love with nature will speak good about it and this is what we see with Rukmani.

Complete Question:

I felt desperately sorry for them, deprived of the ordinary pleasures of knowing warm sun and cool breeze upon their flesh, of walking out light and free, or of mixing with men and working beside them.

What does the passage tell you about Rukmani’s character?

Rukmani values her freedom and her close connection with nature.

Rukmani is sad that they spend so much time in the schoolhouse and not enough time outside playing.

Rukmani is concerned that they will become sick from inhaling the fumes of the factory.

none of the above

Learn more about Rukmani here:

https://brainly.com/question/7869823

#SPJ1

What does the passage tell you about Rukmani’s character?

Rukmani values her freedom and her close connection with nature.

Rukmani is sad that they spend so much time in the schoolhouse and not enough time outside playing.

Rukmani is concerned that they will become sick from inhaling the fumes of the factory.

none of the above

The passage tells about Rukmani’s character that Rukmani values her freedom and her close connection with nature.

Who is Rukmani?

Rukmani is a young lady who was born into a royal family, she loves to be free where she can be allowed to watch the beautiful nature she loves watching. She felt sorry for people who could not be as free as she is but held bound.

Therefore, The passage tells about Rukmani’s character that Rukmani values her freedom and her close connection with nature.

Learn more on Rukmani below

https://brainly.com/question/7869823

#SPJ1

Which people did you complete the social sleuth activity on?

Answers

Answer:

you

Explanation:

Select the action verb. If the verb is transitive, also select its direct object.

During World War II, Anne Frank and her family hid for two years in the back of an office building on Amsterdam's Prinsengracht canal.

Answers

From the given sentence, the following could be identified:

The action verb: Hid

The direct object: in the back of an office building

What is an Action Verb?

This refers to the type of verb that is used to show the action being taken in a sentence, rather than a state of being and this is an active form of verbs.

Hence, it can be seen from the given sentence, it can be seen that during World War II, Anne Frank and her family hid for two years in the back of an office building and this helped to save their lives as they were in the office building in Amsterdam's Prinsengracht canal.

With this in mind, one can easily see and deduce that the action verb is "hid" and the direct object there is "in the back of an office building"

Answers

Answer:

Why should you keep the problem from me?

We wish you wouldn't shout.

I'd rather you didn't tell her.

I should have helped them.

If only we could have made it to the hospital.

We'd rather speak to the manager.

If only I had paid the fine on time.

I wish I hadn't spent so much this month.

Explanation:

What is the central idea of the text ordinary heroes of hurricane harvey?

Answers

Answer:

is this in a textbook?

Explanation:

I need help with this ASAP please and thank you.. I have to get it done before morning..
On the line before each of the following sentences, write e. If the italicized phrase or clause is essential. Write n.e. if the phrase or clause is nonessential. Insert commas where necessary.

Answers

Answer:

1. n.e 2. e 3. n.e 4 n.e 5. e 6. n.e 7. n.e 8. e 9. e 10 n.e 11. e 12. n.e 13. e 14. e 15. e 16. n.e 17. e 18. e 19. n.e 20. e

Write a description of a cultural conflict you've experienced essay

Answers

Cultural conflicts are disagreements between cultural views and values by two or more sides. Cultural conflict occurs when people's anticipations of a certain demeanor coming from their cultural backgrounds are not met, as others have different cultural experiences and different anticipations.

What are some samples of cultural conflicts?

An illustration of cultural conflict is the debate over abortion. Ethnic cleansing is another severe example of cultural conflict. Wars can also be a consequence of a cultural conflict; for example, the differing opinions on slavery were one of the reasons for the American civil war.

What is considered a cultural conflict?

A cultural conflict is displeasure, hostility, or struggle between neighborhoods who have different philosophies and ways of living, resulting in contradictory aspirations and behaviors.

To learn more about Cultural conflicts, refer

https://brainly.com/question/11645172

#SPJ9

Directions Your older brother is getting married. Several guests who are Not Familiar with the area will be attending the Ceremory . You Have been asked to write direactions on how to got to the wedding Venue. Direactions Should be From a shop which is at the entrance of your area. You must include landmarks, distances and Specific direaction in your reponse drawings. Note: Do Not include illustrations or 100 words. [20] - Write In Point Form

Answers

1. From the entrance of the area, head north for 0.3 miles

2. Turn left at the gas station

3. Drive for 1 mile

4. Turn right at the church

5. Drive for 0.4 miles

6. Turn left at the park

7. Drive for 0.2 miles

8. The wedding venue is on the left side of the road

A group of words with a subject and verb that does not express a complete thought is called a(n)
.

Answers

Answer:

dependent clause

Explanation:

A dependent clause is a group of words that contains a subject and verb but does not express a complete thought. A dependent clause cannot be a sentence.

source: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/independent_and_dependent_clauses/index.html

hope this helps!

Which statement explains how the word agitate contributes to the meaning of the sentence?

Daphne had the ability to agitate her sister to the point that fists would fly.

here are the answers:

It means "delight"; it shows that the author is using a very sarcastic tone.

It means "help"; it shows that Daphne's sister has anger-management issues.

It means "irritate"; it shows that Daphne's behavior causes her sister's reaction.

It means "tickle"; it shows that Daphne's sister is extremely ticklish.

Answers

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

It means "irritate"; it shows that Daphne's behavior causes her sister's reaction

Question 3 of 10
What is Gregor's reaction to seeing the change in his father?
A. Gregor is sad that his father is able to find work without Gregor's
help.
B. Gregor is shocked and can't believe his father looks so strong and
healthy.
C. Gregor is happy that his father is finally supporting the family.
D. Gregor is upset that his father would make a change without
consulting Gregor.

Answers

Gregor's reaction to seeing the change in his father is c. Gregor is shocked and cant believe his father looks so strong and healthy

What is a Narration?

This refers to the storytelling that is done with the aid of a narrator to show the sequence of actions.

Hence, we can see that Gregor's reaction to seeing the change in his father is c. Gregor is shocked and cant believe his father looks so strong and healthy

Answers

Answer:

1. Joseph always held distain against Nixon, for Nixon had won his place in student council for his family’s funding to the school and that he always picked on the younger middle schoolers.

2. My grandmother had no epitaph on her grave, as she intended that there is no need to be reminding her descendants of her sins and dark past.

3. Many thinking and ideas aren’t considered ethnical in modern times, may be considered as morally correct in ancient times.

4.No one broke a laugh when Elvis stepped in a funeral, wearing squeaking clown boots and trying to be facetious.

5.I thought my playlist song was almost inaudible when I realize I forgot to turn on the volume.

Answer:

1. Joseph always held distain against Nixon, for Nixon had won his place in student council for his family’s funding to the school and that he always picked on the younger middle schoolers.

2. My grandmother had no epitaph on her grave, as she intended that there is no need to be reminding her descendants of her sins and dark past.

3. Many thinking and ideas aren’t considered ethnical in modern times, may be considered as morally correct in ancient times.

4.No one broke a laugh when Elvis stepped in a funeral, wearing squeaking clown boots and trying to be facetious.

5.I thought my playlist song was almost inaudible when I realize I forgot to turn on the volume.

CREDICT GOES TO linnconnie22

Explanation:

Elizabeth Proctor says she will not judge her husband for telling a lie. What does this action reveal?

Answers

Answer:

important quotes by Elizabeth Proctor in The Crucible. ... I do not judge you. ... This line is one of the first things Elizabeth says in the play, in the second act during her ... She has not forgiven her husband for his affair despite claiming she has. ... both and making his earlier comment that she will never fail to tell the truth a lie.

How doe the peeh "give me liberty or give me death"reflect the role of the individual in ociety?

Answers

George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and five of the six other Virginians who would later sign the Declaration of Independence were in attendance that day. Historians say that Henry's “Liberty or Death” speech helped convince those in attendance to begin preparing Virginia troops for war against Great Britain.

This speech was given by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775, in response to interference of the Royal Navy brought in from the King's appointed Governor, Lord Dunmore. Mr. Henry was requesting that it was time for the Virginia colony to raise a militia in order to defend their right to freedom.

Learn more about Liberty or Death to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/12319952

#SPJ4

Which question best serves the purpose of an interview?
A. What is the name of your company?
B. How did you become interested in this subject?
C. Would you recommend this career to others?
D. What type of work do you do?

Answers

Answer:

I would say B would be the best answer but i am not really sure.

1. According to the novel My Antonia by Willa Cather
Who is the narrator? What picture do we get of his life? What is the reality of his life as it is hinted at in Introduction?

Answers

The narrator of My Antonia by Willa Cather is Jim Burden, who is also the protagonist of the story. The novel begins with an introduction, where the author mentions meeting Jim Burden on a train journey. In the story, Jim is a ten-year-old orphan who travels to Nebraska to live with his grandparents. He is reserved and introspective, and he forms a close bond with Antonia Shimerda, a young Bohemian immigrant girl. Jim grows up to become a successful lawyer in New York City, but he still feels a strong connection to Antonia and his memories of their time together.

In the introduction, it is hinted that Jim's life is not as idyllic as it may seem. The author mentions that Jim is on a journey to "reclaim his childhood," suggesting that he may be seeking some sort of escape or redemption. Additionally, the author reveals that Jim has never married and that he has a "romantic" nature, which could imply that he has struggled with forming lasting connections with others. Overall, while Jim's life appears successful on the surface, there is a sense of loneliness and yearning beneath the surface that the introduction hints at.

Know more about Willa Cather here:

https://brainly.com/question/31884220

#SPJ11

Why do you think Mr and Mrs.rat are searching for the future husband of their daughter?

Answers

Answer:

While taking tea, Mrs. Fitzgerald tells Mrs. Pearson her fortune with the help of cards. According to her, Mrs. Pearson’s problem is that she is excessively fond of her husband and children.

Explanation:

hope it helps

I am a word when reciprocate my spelling I still remain the same. What am l?

Answers

Answer:

i think the answer is racecar

Explanation:

konti kita tatantanan tandaan mo mali ang sagot mo kaya dapat sato matuto na pinaparusahan sa mga maling sagot mo G. A.G.O

How does Ralph try to maintain order and a sense of society amongst the boys? You must give specific examples.

Answers

In the novel "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding, Ralph tries to maintain order and a sense of society amongst the boys by establishing rules and assigning tasks to each of them.

For instance, he calls for a meeting and suggests that they use a conch shell as a signal to assemble. He also proposes that they build shelters and keep a signal fire burning to increase their chances of being rescued.

Ralph tries to create a sense of democracy among the boys by allowing them to express their opinions and participate in decision-making. He also tries to instill a sense of responsibility and accountability by assigning roles and responsibilities to each boy. For example, he appoints Jack as the leader of the hunters and Piggy as his advisor.

Furthermore, Ralph tries to maintain a sense of civility and respect among the boys by establishing rules and enforcing them. He emphasizes the importance of respecting each other and taking turns to speak during meetings. He also tries to prevent conflicts and violence by establishing a system of justice and punishment.

Overall, Ralph's attempts to maintain order and a sense of society among the boys are admirable, but they prove to be difficult and ultimately fail as the boys descend into chaos and savagery.

More on Lord of the Flies: https://brainly.com/question/3884795

#SPJ11

Montaigne argues that
benefiting at the expense of
others is actually according to
the laws of nature
(Sec. 3). This appeals to

Answers

Montaigne's argument that benefiting at the expense of others is actually according to the laws of nature appeals to the law of the jungle.

How to explain the information

This law states that in nature, there is a constant struggle for survival and that the strong will always prey on the weak. Montaigne argues that this same law applies to human society, and that those who are able to benefit at the expense of others are simply following the natural order of things.

Montaigne's argument is controversial, and there are many who would argue that it is morally wrong to benefit at the expense of others. However, Montaigne's argument is also thought-provoking, and it forces us to consider the nature of human society and the role of competition in our lives.

In addition to the law of the jungle, Montaigne's argument may also appeal to the survival of the fittest.

Leans more about Montaigne on

https://brainly.com/question/31447167

#SPJ1

Read the following excerpt from Banneker's letter (Refer to your literature textbook
page 50 for context).
"That I now confess to you, that I am not under that state of tyrannical thralldom,
and inhuman captivity to which many of my brethren are doomed, but that I have
abundantly tasted of the fruition of those blessings, which proceed from that free
and unequalled liberty with which you are favored;" (p. 50)
Which of the following terms in the above quote have a negative connotation or
tone?
Tyrannical thralldom
Inhuman captivity
Unequaled liberty
Doomed
A, B & D

Answers

Answer: ABC&

Explanation: I took the test

The terms in the above quote which have a negative connotation or tone is A, B & C.

Affluent Benjamin Banneker, a descendant of slaves, writes to Thomas Jefferson to express his rage and indignation over slaveownership. He makes the case for the abolition of slavery through a variety of rhetorical devices.Despite drawing Jefferson's attention, Banneker's letter had no impact on his opinions on slavery; Jefferson was the first president to have owned slaves in the Executive Mansion, and he emancipated all five slaves before his death in 1826.He successfully convinces Jefferson against slavery by using irony. He achieves this by highlighting a specific passage from the Declaration that emphasizes the equality of all people. Ironically, men who are slaves do not have the same rights as women. The Jefferson feels guilty as a result of this.

Thus the correct option is C. Here it is to be noted that the Option C is "A, B & C" and not " A, B & D".

To learn more about Banneker's letter, refer: https://brainly.com/question/24758062

#SPJ1

Edit the text below. add or remove apostrophes where appropriate. there are 3 errors to be corrected. i peered out the window at the lengthening shadows of the trees. we'd been on the road for six hours, but it felt like sixty given the appalling surface. i was now worried that we wouldn’t arrive before nightfall, and my fears werent helped by the drivers eccentric behaviour. although it was dark, he still hadn’t turned the vans lights on. through my translator, i enquired why, yet i immediately wished i hadn't. there weren’t any. fearing that we might all have to spend a night in the jungle, i ventured another question beloved of children everywhere. "are we nearly there yet?" just one more hour was the reply. i checked my watch. sunset was in 10 minutes. fifty minutes on an unmade trail at 40 miles per hour. in the jungle. in the dark. just great.

Answers

A sentence including a subordinate clause is a complex sentence. Although it was dark, and fear to spend the night in the wilderness is a complex statement.

What are complex statements?

Complex statements are the sentences including the independent and the conditional clause. They are used in the sentences to describe the complete and the incomplete thoughts.

The dependent clauses in the problematic statements are:Although it was dark, he still hadn’t ridden the van’s lights on.I was now worried that we wouldn’t come before nightfall, and my fears weren’t helped

To learn more about Complex statements, refer

https://brainly.com/question/17538242

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

I peered out the window at the lengthening shadow's of the trees. We'd been on the road for six hours, but it felt like sixty given the appalling surface. I was now worried that we wouldn’t arrive before nightfall, and my fears weren't helped by the driver's eccentric behaviour. Although it was dark, he still hadn’t turned the vans lights on.

Through my translator, I enquired why, yet I immediately wished I hadn't. There weren’t any.

Fearing that we might all have to spend a night in the jungle, I ventured another question beloved of children everywhere. “Are we nearly there yet?” Just one more hour was the reply.

CONFLICT-The Outsiders
Directions: Describe a conflict that Ponyboy or another main character
encounters for each type listed. Explain how the conflict is resolved or dealt with.
Man vs. Man
Conflict:

Character vs. character
How it is resolved:

Answers

Ponyboy Curtis faces a conflict with Bob Sheldon, a violent Soc gang member. It is resolved when Ponyboy's friend Johnny stabs Bob in self-defense, leading to consequences for both characters.

Conflict: In "The Outsiders," a conflict between Ponyboy Curtis and Bob Sheldon arises. Bob is a member of the Socs, a rival gang, and has a reputation for being aggressive and violent. One night, while Ponyboy and his friend Johnny are at a park, they encounter Bob and his friends, who attempt to initiate a fight.

How it is resolved: The conflict escalates, and Bob and his friends overpower Ponyboy and Johnny, intending to severely harm them. In a desperate attempt to defend themselves, Johnny uses a switchblade and stabs, Bob, resulting in his death. This unexpected turn of events leaves Ponyboy and Johnny in shock and fear for their lives.

Following the incident, Ponyboy and Johnny seek help from their gang, the Greasers, who advise them to go into hiding to avoid the authorities. As the story progresses, the conflict takes a different direction, focusing on the fallout from the incident and the potential consequences that Ponyboy and Johnny may face.

While this particular conflict between Ponyboy and Bob is resolved through Johnny's act of self-defense, it also sparks further conflicts and challenges for the characters as they navigate the aftermath and the implications of their actions.

know more about Conflict here:

https://brainly.com/question/7965678

#SPJ8

Suddenly, Tessie Hutchinson shouted to Mr. Summers, "You didn’t give him time enough to take any paper he wanted. I saw you. It wasn’t fair!" "Be a good sport, Tessie," Mrs. Delacroix called, and Mrs. Graves said, "All of us took the same chance. " —"The Lottery," Shirley Jackson In this passage, who represents the individual? Mrs. Delacroix Mrs. Graves Tessie Hutchinson Mr. Summers.

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

Tessie hutchans

Answer:

Explanation:

Read excerpt from the Foreword to The Cruise of the Snark by Jack London

1 It began in the swimming pool at Glen Ellen. Between swims it was our wont to come out and lie in the sand and let our skins breathe the warm air and soak in the sunshine. Roscoe was a yachtsman. I had followed the sea a bit. It was inevitable that we should talk about boats. We talked about small boats, and the seaworthiness of small boats. We instanced Captain Slocum and his three years’ voyage around the world in the Spray.

2 We asserted that we were not afraid to go around the world in a small boat, say forty feet long. We asserted furthermore that we would like to do it. We asserted finally that there was nothing in this world we’d like better than a chance to do it.

3 “Let us do it,” we said . . . in fun. Then I asked Charmian privily if she’d really care to do it, and she said that it was too good to be true.

4 The next time we breathed our skins in the sand by the swimming pool I said to Roscoe, “Let us do it.”

5 I was in earnest, and so was he, for he said, “When shall we start?”

6 I had a house to build on the ranch, also an orchard, a vineyard, and several hedges to plant, and a number of other things to do. We thought we would start in four or five years. Then the lure of the adventure began to grip us. Why not start at once? We’d never be younger, any of us. Let the orchard, vineyard, and hedges be growing up while we were away. When we came back, they would be ready for us, and we could live in the barn while we built the house.

7 So the trip was decided upon, and the building of the Snark began. We named her the Snark because we could not think of any other name—this information is given for the benefit of those who otherwise might think there is something occult in the name.

8 Our friends cannot understand why we make this voyage. They shudder, and moan, and raise their hands. No amount of explanation can make them comprehend that we are moving along the line of least resistance; that it is easier for us to go down to the sea in a small ship than to remain on dry land, just as it is easier for them to remain on dry land than to go down to the sea in the small ship. This state of mind comes of an undue prominence of the ego. They cannot get away from themselves. They cannot come out of themselves long enough to see that their line of least resistance is not necessarily everybody else’s line of least resistance. They make of their own bundle of desires, likes, and dislikes a yardstick wherewith to measure the desires, likes, and dislikes of all creatures. This is unfair. I tell them so. But they cannot get away from their own miserable egos long enough to hear me. They think I am crazy. In return, I am sympathetic. It is a state of mind familiar to me. We are all prone to think there is something wrong with the mental processes of the man who disagrees with us.

9 The ultimate word is I LIKE. It lies beneath philosophy, and is twined about the heart of life. When philosophy has maundered ponderously for a month, telling the individual what he must do, the individual says, in an instant, “I LIKE,” and does something else, and philosophy goes glimmering. . . . Philosophy is very often a man’s way of explaining his own I LIKE. But to return to the Snark, and why I, for one, want to journey in her around the world. The things I like constitute my set of values. The thing I like most of all is personal achievement—not achievement for the world’s applause, but achievement for my own delight. It is the old “I did it! I did it! With my own hands I did it!” But personal achievement, with me, must be concrete. I’d rather win a water-fight in the swimming pool, or remain astride a horse that is trying to get out from under me, than write the great American novel. Each man to his liking. Some other fellow would prefer writing the great American novel to winning the water-fight or mastering the horse.

According to the information in the passage, what is the obstacle to mutual understanding?

A. the likelihood of experiencing diverse life events

B. the tendency to judge others’ desires by one’s own

C. the inclination to react emotionally in disagreements

D. the difficulty of putting others’ needs before one’s own

Answers

According to the information in the passage, the obstacle to mutual understanding is option B: the tendency to judge others’ desires by one’s own. The author states that their friends cannot understand why they want to make the voyage on the Snark, and even after being told, they cannot comprehend that their line of least resistance is not necessarily everybody else’s line of least resistance. The author argues that this state of mind comes from an undue prominence of the ego, where people cannot get away from themselves and make their own bundle of desires, likes, and dislikes a yardstick wherewith to measure the desires, likes, and dislikes of all creatures. The author argues that this is unfair and that people are prone to think there is something wrong with the mental processes of the man who disagrees with us.

Other Questions