refers to an elected leader's looking out for his or her constituents while carrying out the duties of office are

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it is B ....

Answer:

Explanation:

The expert witness who would testify on previously broken bones of a victim is a Medical expert. Medical experts are professionals who have extensive knowledge and experience in the medical field and can provide expert opinions on medical issues related to a particular case. In this case, the medical expert would examine the victim's medical records, x-rays, and other relevant medical information to determine the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by the victim, including the previously broken bones. They would then provide expert testimony in court to explain their findings and opinions to the judge and jury.

Answer:

All of these choices are correct.

Explanation:

- In Personam Jurisdiction

In personam jurisdiction (or personal jurisdiction) refers to courts' authority over particular entities, and their liabilities & rights.

- In Rem Jurisdiction

In rem jurisdiction refers to courts' authority over property within a county, district, or state.

- Original and Appellate Jurisdiction

Original jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review a case, and appellate jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review decisions adjudicated by lower courts.

Impact that forensic evidence will have on suspect identification from police, prosecution, and defense perspective is that it will help with the data of the criminal and unveil the identity of criminal.

Forensic evidence is the use of science in the domain of legal proceedings.

It help to know if the suspect is guilty or not  by conducting series of tests. These tests are been conducted with the help of experts in the  scientific, medical, or technological field.

Learn more about forensic evidence on:

https://brainly.com/question/3049628

#SPJ1

Answer:

allah has created us to worship him only and no one else

Answer:

Probably 3. and 4. but it seems subjective

Explanation:

Prosecutors are known for being among the best lawyers in the nation.

They deal with high-stakes court cases.

Most say the challenging work is also very rewarding.

Just got it right : )

Common law is often referred to as case law and judge-made law .

Option e is correct .

Common law is a system of law based on judicial judgments and precedents. It is developed and refined by the application of legal principles and arguments by judges in adjudicating a particular case. When judges interpret and apply law to resolve disputes, their decisions become part of common law and provide binding precedent for future litigation involving similar points of fact or law. Set.

The term "case law" reflects the fact that common law is built on the outcomes of specific cases decided by courts. Judges' decisions in these cases serve as precedents that guide future court decisions and shape the development of law.  

Hence, Option e is correct .

To know more about case law visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30580233

#SPJ4

The use-of-force continuum offers guidelines for the appropriate level of response based on the level of threat presented by a suspect or subject.

The use-of-force continuum is a model used by law enforcement agencies to define the levels of force that are appropriate in various situations, depending on the level of resistance or threat presented by a suspect or subject.

The continuum typically consists of a series of levels or stages, each of which represents a different level of force that may be used in response to a particular type of resistance or threat. The levels may range from verbal commands and passive physical control to the use of non-lethal force, such as pepper spray or batons, and ultimately to deadly force, such as the use of firearms.

To know more about "force continuum ". here

https://brainly.com/question/20143412

#SPJ4

In libel suits where the First Amendment defense is applicable, appellate courts are mandated to re-examine the evidence and ensure that it supports the finding of actual malice.

Actual malice is a legal standard that applies to defamation cases involving public figures. It requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant made false statements with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.

The First Amendment defense is often invoked to protect free speech rights in such cases. When the appellate courts review these cases, they have a duty to carefully scrutinize the evidence presented to determine whether the plaintiff has met the high burden of proving actual malice. This re-examination helps to safeguard the balance between freedom of speech and the protection of individuals' reputations.

To learn more about defamation cases, click here:

brainly.com/question/29829998

#SPJ11

Driving Under the Influence, Smuggling and Illegal Gambling these are the three situations that members of the community violated laws in the Philippines.

A violation is any act or behavior that goes against a law, rule, agreement, or code of conduct. It is breaking or disregarding an established code of conduct or rule that has been put in place. Violations can occur in many areas, such as business, sports, and law.

1.Driving Under the Influence - Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs is a violation of the Philippine laws and can result in serious consequences. The corresponding action to correct this violation is to impose a hefty fine, suspension of license, and/or imprisonment.
2.Smuggling - Smuggling is a violation of the Philippine laws and is a serious offense. The corresponding action to correct this violation is to impose a hefty fine, cancel trade licenses, and/or imprisonment.
3.Illegal Gambling - Illegal gambling is a violation of the Philippine laws and can result in serious consequences. The corresponding action to correct this violation is to impose a hefty fine, suspension of license, and/or imprisonment.

To learn more about violation
https://brainly.com/question/13885689
#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

There are four characteristics that generally define the role of the police. Which of the

following is NOT among those characteristics?

O The police perform ongoing educational roles in the community

O The police are community leaders in public safety.

• The police occasionally serve in a hostile or dangerous environment.

O The police solve sociological problems for people on a short term basis.

Answer:

more important than what

Answer:

The officials should research the crime area and they should also get the statements from the person who killed. Until all the investigation is completed, they should treat the person as neither criminal nor victim. ... In principles of Ubuntu, a victim should be treated with broad humanity and ethics

Explanation:

Answer:

The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:

Law and economics school of thought.

Explanation:

The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws.  This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices.  This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.

The statement is true. Antitrust laws were enacted to promote fair competition and prevent monopolistic practices, rather than to protect companies engaging in bullying tactics.

These laws aim to ensure a level playing field among businesses operating in similar industries and protect the interests of consumers by encouraging competition, innovation, and market efficiency.

Antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act in the United States, were established to address concerns about the concentration of economic power and the negative effects of monopolies. These laws prohibit anti-competitive behavior, such as price fixing, market allocation, and monopolistic practices that restrict competition or harm consumers.

The primary goal of antitrust laws is to foster a competitive marketplace that benefits consumers by promoting lower prices, better product quality, and increased innovation.

By preventing companies from engaging in unfair practices that could stifle competition, antitrust laws ensure that businesses have a fair opportunity to succeed based on their merits, rather than resorting to bullying tactics or gaining undue advantages through anti-competitive behavior.

Learn more about monopolistic practices here:

brainly.com/question/30664363

#SPJ11

The statement is true. Antitrust laws were enacted to promote fair competition and prevent monopolistic practices, rather than to protect companies engaging in bullying tactics.

These laws aim to ensure a level playing field among businesses operating in similar industries and protect the interests of consumers by encouraging competition, innovation, and market efficiency.

Antitrust laws, such as the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act in the United States, were established to address concerns about the concentration of economic power and the negative effects of monopolies. These laws prohibit anti-competitive behavior, such as price fixing, market allocation, and monopolistic practices that restrict competition or harm consumers.

The primary goal of antitrust laws is to foster a competitive marketplace that benefits consumers by promoting lower prices, better product quality, and increased innovation.

By preventing companies from engaging in unfair practices that could stifle competition, antitrust laws ensure that businesses have a fair opportunity to succeed based on their merits, rather than resorting to bullying tactics or gaining undue advantages through anti-competitive behavior.

Learn more about monopolistic practices here:

brainly.com/question/30664363

#SPJ11

Answer:

Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.

Explanation:

A broker was found guilty of trust fund conversion b an administrative law judge. Each of the following is an action that the Commissioner could take against the broker, except sue the broker in criminal court for the injured parties (option c).

A broker has been found guilty of trust fund conversion by an administrative law judge. The Commissioner has several options available to them to take action against the broker. These options include restricting, revoking, or suspending the broker's license or suing the broker in criminal court for the injured parties. However, the option that is not available to the Commissioner is to sue the broker in criminal court for the injured parties.

The reason for this is that the Commissioner does not have the authority to bring criminal charges against the broker. The Commissioner's role is to regulate and enforce the rules and regulations of the industry, but criminal charges are the responsibility of law enforcement agencies. If the injured parties wish to pursue criminal charges against the broker, they would need to file a complaint with the appropriate law enforcement agency.

In summary, while the Commissioner has several options available to them to take action against a broker who has been found guilty of trust fund conversion, suing the broker in criminal court for the injured parties is not one of them. The correct option is c.

The complete question is:

A broker was found guilty of trust fund conversion b an administrative law judge. Each of the following is an action that the Commissioner could take against the broker, except:

a) restrict the broker's license

b) revoke the broker's license

c) sue the broker in criminal court for the injured parties

d) suspend the broker's license

For more about trust fund:

https://brainly.com/question/30979602

#SPJ11

According to the government purchases multiplier and the change in government spending, we can say that the government reduced its purchasing by $4.11 million.

The formula from which we can get the government purchases multiplier is:

Change in aggregate demand = Government purchases multiplier * Change in government purchases

If government purchases multiplier is 4.5 and change in aggregate demand is $18.5 million, then the change in government purchases is:

= - 18.5 million / 4.5

= - $4.11 million

This shows a decrease in government purchases.

The government purchases multiplier is used to calculate how much the level of aggregate demand will vary if government spending changes.

Federal, state, and municipal governments spend money on products and services through government purchases. The sum of this spending, excluding transfer payments and debt interest, is a significant contributor to a country's gross domestic product (GDP).

Learn more about government purchases here:

https://brainly.com/question/13302294

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. It made a Unilateral mistake

2. It cannot be voided by the cruise line

Explanation:

This cruise line has made a Unilateral mistake in this scenario.

In terms of the law, this cruise line does not have the power to void the transaction on its own accord in the normal course of business. but it has the right to plea in a law court that it did this business transaction sale based on non availability of complete price quote and also that there was a unilateral mistake of facts. It will also have to make a case that the sale was caused by the buyer who tried to benefit from the mistake through misrepresentation and omissions.

The court would then decide on the case at it own discretion.

Using the democracy standard, federalism can constrain democracy in five ways as democratic power , influence the policy-making process, restricts the powers of elected officials , unequal distribution , national decisions .

1. Federalism creates distinct levels of government that limit the scope of the citizens’ democratic power.
2. Federalism divides the government’s powers, making it difficult for citizens to influence the policy-making process.
3. Federalism restricts the powers of elected officials, resulting in a limited amount of citizens’ input.
4. Federalism can cause unequal distribution of resources and influence among the states, resulting in less power for citizens in some states.
5. Federalism can prevent citizens from having the same voice in national decisions that they do in state and local decisions.

For more similar questions on federalism:

brainly.com/question/12835949

#SPJ11

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

Democracies have something called the "consent of the governed" where the people trust the Government (institution) to create and enforce public policies as approved by the people.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

Government

Explanation:

Did the quiz (k12) and got it right. It'd be awesome if you'd mark this as the brainliest answer :)

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

The statement is true that the belief that deviance was caused by the possession of a wicked spirit was prevalent in earlier societies.

However, modern scientific explanations have now replaced this notion. Contemporary studies of deviance focus on understanding the factors and circumstances that contribute to deviant behavior. Sociological theories, such as strain theory and differential association theory, emphasize the role of social structures and relationships in influencing deviance. Psychological theories consider individual factors, such as personality traits and cognitive processes, while biological theories explore genetic and neurological factors that may predispose someone to deviant behavior. In summary, the idea that deviance is caused by the possession of a wicked spirit has been replaced by scientific explanations that consider a wide range of social, psychological, and biological factors in understanding the causes of deviant behavior.

To learn more about possession, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13010242

#SPJ11

If Attitudes toward marijuana use are quickly changing in the US, with 90% of Americans support marijuana use either medically or recreationally.  the test statistic is -4.70.

To test the hypothesis that the residents of the city have lower levels of support for marijuana than the US population, we can use a one-sample proportion test.

First, we need to define our null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The proportion of residents in the city who support marijuana use is the same as or higher than the proportion of Americans who support marijuana use (p ≥ 0.9).

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The proportion of residents in the city who support marijuana use is lower than the proportion of Americans who support marijuana use (p < 0.9).

We can use the following formula to calculate the test statistic:

z = (p - P) / sqrt[P(1-P)/n]

where p is the proportion of residents in the city who support marijuana use, P is the proportion of Americans who support marijuana use (0.9), and n is the sample size (553).

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (0.84 - 0.9) / sqrt[0.9(1-0.9)/553] = -4.70

Therefore, the test statistic is -4.70.

Learn more about test statistic here:https://brainly.com/question/15110538

#SPJ1

Answer:

answer: Chief Legislator

On January 20th the constitution states that a new president shall be inaugurated and this was established by the 20th amendment.

The 20th amendment drawn from the Constitution is specifying the particular term of as being each elected President of the United States. It begins at noon time which is on January 20 of every year followed by the election.

Twentieth Amendment is included in Section 2. As per the amendment, the Congress shall assemble or meet at least once each and every year so that such meeting shall be beginning at noon which will be on the third day of January unless they shall be appointed by law on a different day.

2Oth amendment is commonly known as the “Lame Duck Amendment”. The Twentieth Amendment was generally designed to remove the long period of time excessively so that a defeated president or a particular member of Congress would be continuing for the purpose of serving after his or her bid for reelection as it failed.

The Twentieth Amendment is an amendment proposed by  U.S. Constitution that is setting the inauguration date for upcoming new presidential terms as well as the date for new congress sessions.

Learn to know more about the constitutional amendment at

https://brainly.com/question/20336789

#SPJ4

Answer:

1) The select candidates, set goals, and provide leadership.

2) The give citizens a voice in our government, they inform citizens

3) They involve citizens regularly

Explanation:

Hope this helps you as much as intended.

Answer:

a primitive reflex found in infants of humans and most primates. When an object is placed in an infant's hand and the palm of the child is stroked, the fingers will close reflexively, as the object is grasped via palmar grasp.

Explanation: