a) Susan, the criminal defense attorney, acted unethically.
b) Ozzie, the domestic relations attorney, acted unethically.
c) Marta, the attorney for the family of a man killed in an auto accident, acted unethically.
d) Mike, the real estate attorney, acted unethically.
e) Marcus, the criminal defense attorney, acted unethically.
f) Jose, the corporate lawyer, acted unethically.
a) Susan, the criminal defense attorney, acted unethically by trying to convince a jury that her client was not guilty when she knew he was. As an officer of the court, Susan has a duty to uphold the law and maintain the integrity of the legal system. By knowingly presenting false evidence and arguments, she violated her ethical obligations as a lawyer.
b) Ozzie, the domestic relations attorney, acted unethically by engaging in sexual relations with his client. This behavior is a violation of professional boundaries and can compromise the attorney-client relationship, which is based on trust and confidentiality.
Ozzie's actions may also be considered a form of sexual harassment, which is unethical and illegal.
c) Marta, the attorney for the family of a man killed in an auto accident, acted unethically by having a drink with a juror in the case she is trying. This behavior creates the appearance of impropriety and can compromise the fairness of the trial.
Marta should have avoided any contact with jurors outside the courtroom to avoid any perception of bias or undue influence.
d) Mike, the real estate attorney, acted unethically by charging his wealthy client more than the standard rate for legal work involved in buying a home. This behavior is a violation of the attorney's duty of loyalty and fiduciary duty to the client.
Mike should have charged the client a reasonable and customary fee based on the prevailing rates for similar legal work.
e) Marcus, the criminal defense attorney, acted unethically by putting his client on the stand to testify to her innocence when he knew she was lying. This behavior is a violation of the attorney's duty of candor and honesty to the court.
Marcus should have advised his client against lying and should have presented only truthful and accurate evidence in the case.
f) Jose, the corporate lawyer, acted unethically by recommending a client's son for admission to the state bar without regard to the son's qualifications.
This behavior is a violation of the attorney's duty of professionalism and can compromise the integrity of the legal profession. Jose should have recommended the son based solely on his qualifications and without any undue influence or favoritism.
To learn more about ethical or unethical click on,
https://brainly.com/question/28738412
#SPJ4
Which of the following describes what criminal law covers?
A) felonies, misdemeanors, infractions
B) interpretations of state laws, statutory law, federal law
C) laws covered by state governments
D) common law, statutory law, case law
Answer:
c) laws covered by state government
Which of the following is an advantage of being a sole trader?
Select one:
a. the owner has unlimited liability
b. the business has limited life
c. the owner has total autonomy over business decisions
d. the business is not a separate legal entity
oh god
the first one is correct
I took the test too and I got 100%
using brainly in the most of the questions
thx mate for the answer
It's best to use brainly for help, and not just for answers. Make sure you're doing your own study's as well. Thank you & best of luck!
Answer:
Anytime we are all here to assist even no one is perfect even I sometimes get confused.
The crime of drug loitering requires:
A.proof of the possession of a controlled
substance.
B.proof of the delivery of a controlled
substance.
C.an action done in public that manifests the
intent to engage in illegal drug activity.
D.proof of the presence of a controlled
substance.
Answer:
an action done in public that manifests the intent to engage in illegal drug activity.
Explanation:
Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery. Why was this act a violation of both criminal and civil law
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
There are mainly two categories of law which are the criminal law and the civil law.
Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery is both a violation of both criminal and civil law. Criminal law is a law that has to do with crimes while civil law is the law that has to do with private matters or dispute.
It is both a violation of both criminal and civil law because since Franklin intentionally killed two people, he can be charged with homicide in criminal court. Also, based on civil law, he can be sued for wrongful death.
What might happen without the responsibility of citizens to pay taxes or defend the nation?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Question 1 options:
The country might be forced to elect officials who are not qualified to lead.
The country might be vulnerable to attack by an aggressive foreign military force.
The country may not be able to provide necessary assistance to those who are in need.
The government might decide to offer citizenship to people regardless of their age.
If citizens did not have the responsibility to pay taxes or defend the nation then:
The country might be vulnerable to attack by an aggressive foreign military force.The country may not be able to provide necessary assistance to those who are in need.What happens if Americans don't pay taxes?Tax revenue to the federal and state government is the main avenue through which the government gets the money that it uses to take care of American citizens who are in need such as the unemployed and the older generation.
If these taxes are stopped by citizens then these people who might needed help wouldn't get the necessary assistance.
Also, citizens should join the security forces to keep protecting the nation because if they don't, then the country can be vulnerable to attacks by hostile foreign powers.
Find out more on the responsibilities of citizens at https://brainly.com/question/921569
#SPJ1
In your own words, please list the steps of inquiry a court will take in a Chevron two-step analysis:
2. List the components of APA § 553 (Rulemaking Process):
3. How is arbitrary and capricious defined?
4. What is the "record" in a court case?
The Chevron analysis reviews agency interpretations, APA § 553 outlines rulemaking, arbitrary and capricious means irrational, and the court record includes evidence and documents in a case.
Courts use a framework called the Chevron two-step analysis to examine how agencies interpret laws. Step 1 involves determining whether the statute is ambiguous, and Step 2 looks at the reasonableness of the agency's interpretation. The rulemaking procedure is described in APA 553 and includes a notice of proposed rulemaking, a comment period, public involvement, and incorporation of a substantive rule.
According to a standard used to assess agency actions, the agency's decision making process must be reasonable, rational and supported by evidence. This standard is known as the "arbitrary and capricious" standard. The collection of evidence and documents that the court considered in a case is referred to as the "record," and it forms the factual foundation for the court's decision.
Learn more about rulemaking procedure at:
brainly.com/question/31718076
#SPJ4
this is a test i need this NOW
In your opinion, what is the most important personality trait of a diplomat? (Read above to learn the traits) *
The successful FSO candidate demonstrates the skills, abilities, and personal qualities needed to be a diplomat. Diplomats have distinct personalities...They tend to be enterprising individuals, which means they’re adventurous, ambitious, assertive, extroverted, energetic, enthusiastic, confident, and optimistic. They are dominant, persuasive, and motivational. Some of them are also artistic, meaning they’re creative, intuitive, sensitive, articulate, and expressive.
They must stay calm in stressful or difficult situations and be able to think on their feet, adjusting quickly to changing situations. They must be able to work with people from other cultures with different values, political beliefs, and religions. Diplomats need strong analytical, organizational, and leadership skills. They must have good judgment and high integrity. In addition, they must be able to communicate effectively, both in writing and orally. They must be able to learn at least one foreign language, often several, during their careers. Finally, they must be resourceful and creative problem solvers
In your opinion, what is the most important personality trait of a diplomat? (Read above to learn the traits) *
Answer:
NOT YOU CHEATING ON A TEST CHILEE SHWEA
Explanation:
If you find yIf you find yourself in need of cash, the LEAST expensive option is likely to be:
Answer: no one gonna help you :0
Explanation:
School is lame
which is the usually the least costly adr process? a. arbitration b. jury trial c. mediation d. negotation
The least costly ADR process is usually negotiation (option D).
ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a term used to describe various methods of resolving disputes outside of traditional court litigation. These methods can be less expensive, less time-consuming, and less adversarial than going to court.
Negotiation is one form of ADR, which involves the parties in a dispute coming together to discuss and reach a mutually agreeable solution.
Negotiation can occur informally, with the parties discussing the matter directly, or it can occur with the assistance of a third party, such as a mediator.
In terms of cost, negotiation is often the least expensive form of ADR. This is because it typically does not involve hiring a third-party neutral or other professionals to assist in the process. Instead, the parties themselves can come to the table to negotiate and resolve the dispute.
Negotiation can be a cost-effective method for resolving disputes in a variety of situations. For example, it can be used to settle employment disputes, business disputes, and even family disputes. It can also be used in conjunction with other ADR methods, such as mediation or arbitration.
However, it is important to note that while negotiation may be the least costly form of ADR, it may not always be the most effective method for resolving a dispute.
In some cases, parties may be unable to reach an agreement through negotiation alone, and may need to turn to other forms of ADR or even litigation.
Overall, while negotiation may be the least costly ADR process, it is important to consider all available options and choose the method that is most appropriate for the particular dispute at hand.
To learn more about negotiation, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/28461798
#SPJ11
vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in _
Vacant land adjustments have to be made for differences in size, location, and other factors.
When comparing vacant land parcels for valuation or appraisal purposes, it is essential to adjust for differences in various aspects. Some common factors that require adjustments include:
1. Size: Larger or smaller parcels of land may have different values per square foot or acre, so adjustments need to be made to ensure a fair comparison.
2. Location: The value of land can be heavily influenced by its location, such as proximity to amenities, access to transportation, and surrounding development patterns. Therefore, adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
3. Topography: The physical characteristics of the land, such as slope, soil type, and drainage, can impact its value and development potential. Adjustments may be necessary to account for these variations.
4. Zoning and land use restrictions: Different zoning regulations and land use restrictions can significantly impact the value of a parcel of land. Adjustments need to be made to account for these differences when comparing parcels.
5. Utilities and infrastructure: The availability of utilities (water, sewer, electricity, etc.) and access to infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.) can affect the value of vacant land. Adjustments should be made to account for these differences.
Vacant land adjustments are crucial in accurately assessing the value of land parcels for various purposes, such as real estate transactions or property taxes. These adjustments ensure a fair comparison between parcels by accounting for differences in size, location, and other factors.
For more information on Vacant land adjustments kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/14415858
#SPJ11
Which statement best describes a want?
O A. A want is something that would be nice to have.
O
B. A want is something that will help you save money.
O C. A want is something that will help you attain a goal.
D. A want is something that is necessary for survival.
Why was it important to establish the Clean Air Act? to reduce the need to study the effects of dirty air on human health to determine ways to reduce the number of premature deaths per year to create a regulation that makes any activities that pollute the air illegal to raise the cost of air purification techniques to ensure the efficiency of removing air pollution.
Answer:
Because of the Act, Americans breathe less pollution and face lower risks of premature death and other serious health effects.
It was important to establish the Clean Air Act because it helped: B. to determine ways to reduce the number of premature deaths per year.
What is the Clean Air Act?The Clean Air Act can be defined as an amendment of 1990 that was enacted by the U.S Congress, so as to prohibit service-related production and consumption of all refrigerants and other hazardous substances (chemical compounds).
Basically, the main purpose for the establishment of the Clean Air Act is to help determine efficient and effective ways to reduce air pollution, as well as the number of premature deaths per year in America.
In the United States of America, the Clean Air Act limits the consumption and production of the following chemical compounds:
Nitrogen dioxideChlorofluorocarbonsCarbon monoxideRead more on Clean Air Act here: https://brainly.com/question/16804832
#SPJ2
NS)
Pressure group includes all except ....... (a)Nigerian Medical Association (b)Nigerian
Union of Teachers (©)Nigerian union of Journalist (d)Nigerian Police force
Answer: (d)Nigerian Police force
Explanation:
Pressure group simply refers to an organization that influences the government to take action with regards to a particular issue. Pressure groups can include ethnic associations or trade unions.
The pressure groups serve as an important link between the government and the people that are being governed. From the options given, pressure group includes Nigerian Medical Association, Nigerian
Union of Teachers and the Nigerian union of Journalist.
It should be noted that the Nigerian Police Force isn't a pressure group.
give me one word that can describe a diplomat.
Answer:
fancy
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
What is the best example of the harmonization of international law? Multiple Choice
Incoterms of the International Chamber of Commerce
IP index of the Global Intellectual Property Center
China’s Anti-Monopoly Act
Madrid Agreement of 1891
The best example of the harmonization of international law is the "Incoterms of the International Chamber of Commerce."What are Incoterms?Incoterms are an abbreviation for "International Commercial Terms." It is a collection of internationally recognized trade laws that outline the terms of delivery and the seller's and buyer's responsibilities.
They are maintained by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).There are 11 Incoterms. They have three-letter acronyms, such as FOB, CIF, DDP, and so on. These terms explain the delivery process, who is in charge of the products, who pays for the delivery, and when the goods are passed from the seller to the buyer. They are used by businesses to establish contractual terms when selling goods internationally.How do they assist in harmonizing international law?Harmonization refers to the integration of legal and regulatory frameworks in various countries. Incoterms help promote this by providing a common language for companies to use in global transactions. When a buyer and seller negotiate and agree on delivery terms, they are using standardized phrases that are recognized around the world. As a result, misunderstandings are reduced, and there are fewer conflicts. It also reduces the need for lawyers to review and negotiate contracts, lowering transaction costs.
To know more about international law
visit https://brainly.com/question/33526761
#SPJ11
the authors state that governmental policy does not necessarily reflect the interests—indeed, the welfare—of the public, even though it is intended to do so. which is not a reason given for this
There could be several reasons why government policy may not necessarily reflect the interests or welfare of the public, even if it is intended to do so.
One possible reason is that politicians and policymakers may have their own personal interests or biases that influence their decision-making, which may not align with those of the public. Additionally, political parties and special interest groups may have a significant influence on the policy-making process, often prioritizing their own interests over the broader public interest. Another reason could be the inherent complexity of policymaking, which can involve balancing multiple competing interests and priorities, making it difficult to fully satisfy everyone. Finally, limited resources and budget constraints may force policymakers to make difficult choices that may not always align with the interests of the public. Ultimately, the reasons why governmental policy may not always reflect the interests or welfare of the public are complex and multifaceted, and require careful consideration and analysis to fully understand.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
it is generally assumed in america that media owned or controlled by the government does which of the following
It is generally assumed that in America media is owned or controlled by the government and it simply promotes the objectives of the government.
The word "medium" is pluralized to "media," which (generally speaking) refers to any route of communication. A kind of media is anything that can reach or sway people, including telephones, television, and the Internet.
The National Broadcasting Company (NBC), CBS (originally the Columbia Broadcasting System), American Broadcasting Company (ABC), and Fox Broadcasting Company are the four major broadcasters in the United States (Fox).
By covering and commenting on parliamentary procedures, government operations, and the viewpoints and alternative policies of the opposition, the media informs the public. Access to information is necessary for all of these operations.
To learn more about American media, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26764032
#SPJ4
Define risky behavior and two factors why it is important for youth to investigate and be knowledgeable
When a person is on risk behavior or risky behavior, he or she has the risk of hurting himself or herself or the people around them, either physically, mentally or emotionally.
It becomes important for youth to investigate such a behavior, is because then they may avoid the risk that it carries and save themselves or the people around them. Not to forget that investigating does not mean exposing yourself to such a risky behavior.
It would just be sufficient if you read about the behavior or research it. This would be easier and less risk-taking for the youth of the day.
To learn more about risky behavior, click
https://brainly.com/question/23034907
#SPJ4
Pam is an agent for Refined Chemicals Corporation. Refined Chemicals owes Pam the duty ofa.performance.b.accounting.c.obedience.d.safe workingconditions.
Pam, as an agent for Refined Chemicals Corporation, is owed the duty of obedience. The correct answer is option c.
The duty of obedience is one of the fundamental responsibilities of an agent towards their principal (the company they represent). It means that the agent is obligated to follow the lawful instructions and directions given by the principal within the scope of their agency relationship. This duty requires the agent to act in accordance with the best interests of the principal and to carry out their duties faithfully and diligently.
While a company may also owe duties such as performance, accounting, and providing a safe working environment to its employees, in this case, the question is asking about the duty owed to Pam as an agent. Therefore, the correct answer is the duty of obedience.
The correct answer is option c.
To know more about obedience refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/29031144
#SPJ11
Evaluate the success or failures of the competition policy in South Africa using current examples
The success of the competition policy of South Africa lead to:
The product choices as well as with its competitive prices were given to consumers. Market Practices e.g. horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was deemed unlawful.What is the competition policy in South Africa?The aim of the Competition Act of 1998 is to boasr and maintain competition in South Africa as it was enacted to:
To promote efficiency.The development of the economy as well as others.Therefore, The success of the competition policy of South Africa lead to:
The product choices as well as with its competitive prices were given to consumers. Market Practices e.g. horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was deemed unlawful.Learn more about South Africa from
https://brainly.com/question/1056948
#SPJ1
When you appeal the verdict of a trial court, what does the appellate court review?.
Answer:
The appellate court reviews the case that you are asking for an appeal on. Then they decide if to allow the appeal or say no to the appeal.
Explanation:
Pls mark Brainliest with the crown
While browsing in a clothing store, Alice decided to take a purse without paying for it. She placed the purse under her coat and took a couple of steps toward the exit. She then realized that a sensor tag on the purse would set off an alarm. She placed the purse near the counter from which she had removed it. Alice has committed
(A) no crime, because the purse was never removed from the store.
(B) no crime, because she withdrew from her criminal enterprise.
(C) only attempted larceny, because she intended to take the purse out of the store.
(D) Larceny, because she took the purse from its original location and concealed it with the intent to steal.
Alice has committed the crime of larceny because she took the purse from its original location, concealed it, and intended to steal it.
In this scenario, Alice's actions meet the elements of larceny, which is the unlawful taking and carrying away of someone else's property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of its possession. Although Alice did not successfully leave the store with the purse, her actions demonstrate the necessary elements of larceny. She took the purse from its original location, concealed it under her coat, and had the intent to steal it by attempting to leave the store without paying. Therefore, option (D) is the correct answer as Alice's actions constitute larceny.
To learn more about larceny, refer:
brainly.com/question/17612570
#SPJ11
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
The petitioner is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.
A.) True
B.) False
Answer: I believe its false
Explanation:
Define, describe, compare, and contrast common-law crimes and statutory crimes. Be sure to provide examples.
Answer:
Common law is commonly defined as jurisprudence and it is of 2 types – one in which the decisions made are existing legislation in which there are no legislation and another where the court may require the current law and establish new definitions and divisions.
The legislative regulations can be enacted by the various departments of a country. Therefore, there's many laws enacted by state and federal governments, laws enacted by cities and municipalities, all of which have the force of law.
What was the law that required men of certain ages to serve in the military?.
Answer:
selective service act
Explanation:
congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.
Penalties for your first DUI conviction include_____.
Does that solve you question
Rebecca is serving as Defense Counsel to Mr. Smith, who has been indicted for burglary. During an interview, Mr. Smith told Rebecca that he had perjured himself at his grand jury indictment before consulting with her.
Answer:
r Smith because he was being perjured