Sarai is mixing a solution she pours all the liquid froma full small beaker intoa large beaker the liquid fils the large beaker to 15% of its cpicity if the small beaker holds 300 ml how much does the large beaker hold

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\frac{2(2)}{2} +2(2)+\frac{2(6)}{2} =2+4+6\\ =12\)

Answer: Ryan had a head start of 10 meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ryan has a 10 m head start then Nina.

A linear equation is an algebraic equation of the form y=mx+b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept, and only a constant and a first-order (linear) term are included. Sometimes, the aforementioned is referred to as a "linear equation of two variables," with y and x serving as the variables.

Nina Run from the graph

T         D

4        32

6        48

8        64

10      80

For every 2 Secs, there is a distance of  16 m

Hence Speed = Slope = 16/2 = 8m /s

y - 32 = 8 (x - 4)

=> y = 8x

at x = 0  ( 0 times)

Distance = 0 m

Ryan  Run from the table

T         D

4        35

6        47.5

8        60

12.5 m for every 2 sec

Speed = slope = 12.5/2 = 25/4

\(y - 35 = (25/4)(x - 4)\\= > 4y - 140 = 25x - 100\\= > 4y = 25x + 40\\at x = 0\\= > y = 10\\\)

Hence Ryan had a head start of 10 m

Learn more about Linear equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ7

Answer:

nth term = tn = n� - 2n - 6

if i'm wrong i'm rlly rlly sorry!!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) To find the probability that it is raining when you arrive in Oneirabad on a random day, we need to use the law of total probability.

Let A be the event that it is raining, and B be the event that it is the Wet season.

P(A) = P(A|B)P(B) + P(A|B')P(B')

Given that the Wet season lasts for 1/3 of the year, we have P(B) = 1/3. The probability that it is raining during the Wet season is 3/4, so P(A|B) = 3/4.

The Dry season lasts for 2/3 of the year, so P(B') = 2/3. The probability that it is raining during the Dry season is 1/6, so P(A|B') = 1/6.

Now we can calculate the probability that it is raining when you arrive:

P(A) = (3/4)(1/3) + (1/6)(2/3)

= 1/4 + 1/9

= 9/36 + 4/36

= 13/36

Therefore, the probability that it is raining when you arrive in Oneirabad on a random day is 13/36.

(b) Given that it is raining when you arrive, we can use Bayes' theorem to calculate the probability that your visit is during the Wet season.

Let C be the event that your visit is during the Wet season.

P(C|A) = (P(A|C)P(C)) / P(A)

We already know that P(A) = 13/36. The probability that it is raining during the Wet season is 3/4, so P(A|C) = 3/4. The Wet season lasts for 1/3 of the year, so P(C) = 1/3.

Now we can calculate the probability that your visit is during the Wet season:

P(C|A) = (3/4)(1/3) / (13/36)

= 1/4 / (13/36)

= 9/52

Therefore, given that it is raining when you arrive, the probability that your visit is during the Wet season is 9/52.

(c) Given that it is raining when you arrive, the probability that it will be raining when you return to Oneirabad in a year's time depends on the season. If you arrived during the Wet season, the probability of rain will be different from if you arrived during the Dry season.

Let D be the event that it is raining when you return.

If you arrived during the Wet season, the probability of rain when you return is the same as the probability of rain during the Wet season, which is 3/4.

If you arrived during the Dry season, the probability of rain when you return is the same as the probability of rain during the Dry season, which is 1/6.

Since the season you arrived in is independent of the weather when you return, we need to consider the probabilities based on the season you arrived.

Let C' be the event that your visit is during the Dry season.

P(D) = P(D|C)P(C) + P(D|C')P(C')

Since P(C) = 1/3 and P(C') = 2/3, we can calculate:

P(D) = (3/4)(1/3) + (1/6)(2/3)

= 1/4 + 1/9

= 9/36 + 4/36

= 13/36

Therefore, the probability that it will be raining when you return to Oneirabad in a year's time, given that it is raining when you arrive, is 13/36.

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The diagonals of a quadrilateral are perpendicular and one pair of opposite sides is parallel.

A quadrilateral is a shape with four straight sides. The trapezoid is a quadrilateral with only one pair of parallel sides.

An isosceles trapezoid is a trapezoid with two of the sides having the same length.

It can be proven that a quadrilateral is either a rectangle or an isosceles trapezoid by the following statement:

The diagonals of a quadrilateral are perpendicular and one pair of opposite sides is parallel.

If a quadrilateral has perpendicular diagonals and one pair of opposite sides that are parallel, then it can be either a rectangle or an isosceles trapezoid.

To know more about quadrilateral visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29934440

#SPJ11

Answer:

All the real number greater than or equal to 2

Answer:

All the real numbers greater than or equal to –3

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the rounded part at the bottom is exactly at -3 (y), which means that anything greater than it can also be a y

This is the right answer pls believe

Answer:

I think it's C. Sorry if it's incorrect! I worked it out in like 2 min.

Salik and Maya are discussing a project that examines the relationship between the number of siblings someone has and their household income. Maya predicts that those with more siblings will have a higher household income. Salik questions whether the number of siblings is a categorical variable since it is a whole number. Our response can be : "In order to conduct this project, we need to choose two quantitative variables, which are variables that can be measured and expressed as numbers. The number of siblings is not a categorical variable because it is a continuous variable that can take on any whole number value."

The number of siblings is a quantitative variable because it can be expressed as a whole number. Household income is also a quantitative variable because it can be measured and expressed as a numerical value. Categorical variables are variables that can be divided into distinct categories or groups, such as gender, race, or occupation. The number of siblings is not a categorical variable because it is a continuous variable that can take on any whole number value.

To examine the relationship between the number of siblings and household income, Maya and Salik could use statistics to analyze their data. They could calculate descriptive statistics such as the mean and standard deviation for each variable, as well as the correlation coefficient to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables. They could also use probability theory to make predictions about the likelihood of certain outcomes, such as the probability that someone with more siblings will have a higher household income.

The complete question is:

Our classmates, Maya and Salik, are talking about the variables they want to study and how they plan to collect their samples. Here is part of their conversation. Respond in the places that say “your response.”

Double-check that both of their variables are quantitative.

Maya: I want to look at the relationship between the number of siblings someone has and the household income. I predict that those with more siblings have a higher household income.

Salik: We need two quantitative variables for this project. Wouldn’t number of siblings be categorical since it is whole numbers?

Your response:.........

Learn more about descriptive statistics at : https://brainly.com/question/28686879

#SPJ11

Answer:

s= number of shirts

3/2= constant of proportionality

Step-by-step explanation:

Josh takes a load of dress shirts to the dry cleaners. The amount he pays for dry cleaning (

f. is given by the equation f=3/2s, where s is the number of shirts. What is the constant of proportionality in terms of the cost per shirt?

Given:

f= 3 / 2s

Where,

f= amount Josh paid for dry cleaning

s= number of shirts

3= constant of proportionality

2= amount paid per shirt

For example, if Josh took 3 shirts to the dry cleaner, the amount Josh will pay is

f= 3 / 2s

= 3 / 2(3)

= 3 / 6

= 1 / 2

f= 1 /2

Answer:

(0; -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

the line is dotted: it means that the points that lie on it are not part of the solution

Answer:

282.74in

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

9-1=8 hence c=9

Answer:

c = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

9 - 8 = 1

Hope this helps!!

Answer:

(2x-5)feet

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of the rectangular garden A = Length × Width

Given the area A(x) = 2x² - 21x + 40

And the width =x-8 feet

To get the length, we will simply factorise the area function as shown;

You will just factorise the area

Factorizing 2x² - 21x+40

2x² − 21x + 40

2x² -16x - 5x + 40

2x(x - 8) -5(x - 8)

=(2x−5)(x−8)

Hence the length of the garden is

(2x-5)feet

Answer:

9.3 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x= 72/19

Step-by-step explanation:

et's solve your equation step-by-step.

19

24

=

3

x

Step 1: Cross-multiply.

19

24

=

3

x

19*x=(3)*(24)

19x=72

Step 2: Divide both sides by 19.

It will cost $70.56 to pour a concrete slab for a patio with the given dimensions.

To calculate the cost of the concrete slab, first, we need to find the volume of the slab in cubic yards. The dimensions given are in feet and inches:

Length = 11 feet
Width = 11 feet
Height = 3 inches (converted to feet: 3/12 = 0.25 feet)

Volume = Length × Width × Height
Volume = 11 × 11 × 0.25 = 30.25 cubic feet

Now, we need to convert cubic feet to cubic yards (1 cubic yard = 27 cubic feet):

Volume = 30.25 cubic feet × (1 cubic yard / 27 cubic feet) = 1.12 cubic yards

Finally, multiply the volume by the cost per cubic yard to find the total cost:

Cost = Volume × Cost per cubic yard
Cost = 1.12 cubic yards × $63.00 per cubic yard = $70.56

So, it will cost $70.56 to pour a concrete slab for a patio with the given dimensions.

To learn more about dimensions here:

brainly.com/question/29767744#

#SPJ11

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2 x 2 = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

if you count 2 2 times then you would get 4. EASY

The calculated answer after simplification in which Ryan has number of baseball cards is: 357 cards

How to simplify statement problems?

In mathematics, the statement based problems can be solved by forming the equations. And later, simplify those equation by equating to each other. This method is very common for the complicated problems to make the calculation easy.

According to the question, Ryan collected 2650 cards. In which, he has more baseball cards compared to football cards.

Now, let us assume, baseball cards be 'B'; football cards be 'F' and hockey cards be 'H'.

As per the question, the formed equation from the statement for the simplification is:

B + F + H = 2650

3B = F and H + 150 = F

Substituting above values in the formed equation to get the simplify answer,

B + 3B + 3B - 150 = 2650 ⇒ 7B = 2500 ⇒ B = 357

Now, the value of football cards is: F = 3(357) = 1071

And, the value of hockey cards is: H = 1071 - 150 = 921

Hence, after simplification Ryan has number of baseball cards is: 357 cards

To learn more about the simplification from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/28780542

#SPJ13

Using the slope formula, we can conclude that the slope of the line is m = 2.

So, the slope of the line is:

Now, put the values and solve for the slope as follows:

Therefore, using the slope formula, we can conclude that the slope of the line is m = 2.

Know more about slope here:

brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ13

The term that suggests that the threat of loss has a greater impact on a decision than the possibility of an equivalent gain is prospect theory.

Prospect theory is a theory that describes how individuals make decisions under uncertainty. The theory suggests that people think about gains and losses differently and that the value they assign to a particular change in their situation depends on their current situation. The theory is based on the observation that people often violate the principle of expected utility. They make decisions that do not maximize their expected utility. The theory suggests that people evaluate outcomes based on changes from a reference point, rather than in absolute terms. This means that people are more sensitive to changes in their situation than to the situation itself.

For example, a loss of $100 is more painful than the pleasure of gaining $100, and the pleasure of gaining $100 is less than the pain of losing $100.

In summary, Prospect theory suggests that the threat of a loss has a greater impact on a decision than the possibility of an equivalent gain.

Learn more about prospect theory from:

https://brainly.com/question/29451765

#SPJ11

The required first step Landon should s=150/(1-0.96).

Here,
The distance that the weight travels before it comes to rest can be found using the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series:

S = a/(1 - r)

where S is the total distance traveled, a is the distance of the first swing, and r is the ratio of the distance of each subsequent swing to the distance of the previous swing.

In this case, a = 150 inches and r = 144/150 = 0.96 (since the return swing is slightly shorter than the previous swing). So the equation that represents the total distance the weight travels before it comes to rest is:

S = 150/(1 - 0.96) = 3750 inches.

Therefore, the correct equation is s=150/(1-0.96).

Learn more about infinite geometric series here:

https://brainly.com/question/23602882

#SPJ1

The number and percentages of the parameters in the question are;

A percentage is a representation of a part of a whole as a fraction with a hundred (100) as the denominator.

T

From the attached table in the question, we get;

The number of people that make more than $60,000 = 388 + 198 + 66 = 652

The number of police officers in the survey  = 224 + 703 + 198 = 1125

The number of police officers that make less than $40,000 = 224

The percentage of police officers that make less than $40,000 is therefore;

Other information obtainable from the table are as follows;

The number of police officers that make more than $40,000 = 703 + 198 = 901

The percentage of all police officers that make more than $40,000 is therefore;

(901 ÷ 1125) × 100 ≈ 80.09%

Learn more about percentages here: https://brainly.com/question/11642822

#SPJ1

Answer:

B) p<5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

24 cats

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of cats to dogs is 6:9. There are 36 dogs in the shelter. Let's make the number of cats x.

6:9=x:36

You multiply 4 with 9 to get 36, so you do the same for 6.

6 x 4 = 24

24 cats in the shelter

Answer:

thirty four thousand nine hundred twenty six and seven hundredths.

Step-by-step explanation:

The number 34,926.07 can be written in word form as "thirty-four thousand nine hundred twenty-six and seven hundredths."

We have.

The number using place value:

Thirty-four:

This represents the number in the thousands place.

The digit "3" is in the tens place, and "4" is in the ones place.

Thousand:

This indicates the place value of "34" in thousands.

Nine hundred twenty-six:

This represents the number in the hundreds, tens, and ones places.

The digit "9" is in the hundreds place, "2" is in the tens place, and "6" is in the ones place.

And:

This connects the two parts of the number: the thousands and the hundreds, tens, and ones.

Seven hundredths:

This represents the decimal portion of the number.

The digits "0" and "7" together indicate the value of seven hundredths.

Thus,

"thirty-four thousand nine hundred twenty-six and seven hundredths" is the word form of the number 34,926.07.

Learn more about place value here:

https://brainly.com/question/27734142

#SPJ3

Answer:

rotated

Step-by-step explanation:

rotated

reflected

translated

dilated

Answer:

a. rotated

Step-by-step explanation:

The sequence {an} = {\(8n^4 + n + 1\)} is not convergent. It diverges to infinity as n approaches infinity.

To determine whether the sequence {an} = {\(8n^4 + n + 1\)} is convergent, we need to examine the behavior of the terms as n approaches infinity.

The sequence {an} is said to be convergent if there exists a real number L such that the terms of the sequence get arbitrarily close to L as n approaches infinity.

To investigate convergence, we can calculate the limit of the sequence as n approaches infinity.

lim(n→∞) \((8n^4 + n + 1)\)

To evaluate this limit, we can look at the highest power of n in the sequence, which is \(n^4.\) As n approaches infinity, the other terms (n and 1) become insignificant compared to n^4.

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity:

lim(n→∞) \(8n^4 + n + 1\)

= lim(n→∞) \(8n^4\)

Here, we can clearly see that the limit goes to infinity as n approaches infinity.

Therefore, the sequence {an} = {\(8n^4 + n + 1\)} is not convergent. It diverges to infinity as n approaches infinity.

To learn more about limit of the sequence visit:

brainly.com/question/30647793

#SPJ11

To find the equation of the quadratic function, we need to use the form:

y = ax^2 + bx + c

We can substitute the values of x and y from the given table into this equation to get a system of three equations:

23 = 36a - 6b + c

8 = 25a - 5b + c

23 = c

Solving this system of equations, we get:

a = 3/2, b = -7/2, c = 23

Therefore, the equation of the function is:

y = 3/2 x^2 - 7/2 x + 23

We can simplify this equation to the vertex form:

y = 3/2 (x - 1) ^2 + 8

So, the answer is not one of the provided choices.

Answer:

y = 3(x + 3)2 − 4

Step-by-step explanation:

i got it right on my quiz

a. The GRP (Gross Rating Points) for the four-week media buy with a 62 reach and 3.2 frequency can be calculated by multiplying the reach by the frequency. Therefore, the GRP for this buy is 62 * 3.2 = 198.4 GRPs.

b. In the case of the similar buy with 230 GRPs and a 50% reach, we can calculate the frequency by dividing the GRPs by the reach. So the frequency is 230 / 50 = 4.6.

When you reach fewer people, you gain a higher frequency. The difference in frequency between the two buys can be calculated by subtracting the initial frequency (3.2) from the frequency in the second buy (4.6). Therefore, the gain in frequency is 4.6 - 3.2 = 1.4.

c. To determine which buy is better, we need to consider the marketing objectives and strategies. If the objective is to maximize reach and exposure to a wider audience, the first buy with a higher reach of 62 would be better. However, if the objective is to focus on repetition and frequency of message delivery to a more targeted audience, the second buy with a higher frequency of 4.6 might be more suitable. The choice depends on the specific goals and priorities of the advertising campaign.

Learn more about Gross Rating Points here: brainly.com/question/32344455

#SPJ11