Answer:
b
Explanation:
Lorne is charged with assaulting his brother with a deadly weapon. There is no dispute about his identity. The main issue for trial is whether or not he intended to cause serious harm to his brother. The prosecutor wants to introduce a video taken of Lorne at his brother's wedding, three years earlier. Lorne, in a brunken rage, lunged at his brother with a steak knife, screaming that he would *ill him. Since the weapon in this case is also a knife, the prosecutor feels the video shows that Lorne has murderous intent toward his brother and uses knives as weapons.
Would the video evidence be helpful to proving the case?
Answer:
this isnt enough evedince as someone who is d runk cant control all of there body functionss, when d runk someone can do/say things they wouldnt normally say or do.
Explanation:
Answer:
since there is evidence that people can control all of their body when dr unk this case should not escalate into a full blow trial the is not a proven fact that when dr Unk you have no control this is a rather a simple matter of a family feud
the video would not be help full
Explanation:
which of the following is not part of a will?
A. A statement of a person's preferences for medical treatment is not a part of Will.
A will is a legal document that expresses your desires for the division of your assets and the care of any minor children. If you die without a will, your wishes may not be fulfilled. Furthermore, your heirs may end up spending more time, money, and emotional energy after you're gone to settle your affairs.
Though no single document is likely to answer every difficulty that emerges after your death, a will, often known as a last will and testament, can come close.
Wills written and signed by the testator but not witnessed are referred to as holographic wills, which derive from the less common secondary definition of the word holograph, which refers to a document handwritten by its author.
To know more about legal document:
https://brainly.com/question/9952763
#SPJ1
Correct question:
Which of the following is not part of a will?
A. A statement of a person's preferences for medical treatment
B. A plan for a person's assets to be distributed properly after their death
C. A statement of who a person wants to take over their assets when they die
D. An outline of a person's wishes for their property after death
When passing a bicyclist, many states have a law that says that the bicyclist must be given how much space A. 6 feet B. 4 feet C. 5 feet D. 3 feet E. none of the above
The bare minimum safe passing distance at slow speeds is three feet from the widest point of both cars. The 3 feet rule is still in effect even if the bicyclist is riding along the edge of the bicycle lane close to the traffic lane.
3 feet or more is regarded as a safe passing distance when a motor vehicle overtakes and passes a bicycle. Until the motor vehicle is safely past the overtaking bicycle, pass with a safe distance between the two vehicles of at least three feet.
Avoid passing or overtaking a cyclist too closely. According to California law, there must be a three-foot minimum space between any motor vehicle part and any part of a bicycle or its rider.
To learn more about bicyclist, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30742805
#SPJ1
STION:
Officer Masih has taken Hank into custody for possession of cocaine. Officer Masih has information that Hank has concealed a baggie of
cocaine in a body cavity. Officer Masih will conduct a body cavity search.
Whether Hank has been seized or not is determined by the standard of:
a. the court.
O b. the perception of the officer.
O c. a reasonable person.
O d. the perception of the suspect.
Whether Hank has been seized or not is determined by the standard of a reasonable person. Option c is correct.
What caused Hank's custody?In this situation, Officer Masih has taken Hank into custody for possession of cocaine and has information that Hank may have concealed drugs in a body cavity. Conducting a body cavity search would be considered a form of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Therefore, in determining whether a search and seizure has occurred, the courts use an objective standard known as the "reasonable person" standard. If Officer Masih conducts a body cavity search without a warrant or without Hank's consent, it would likely be considered a search and seizure that is subject to the protections of the Fourth Amendment.
Find out more about custody at:
https://brainly.com/question/9212750
#SPJ1
I am doing a follow up case on the Dadeville shooting in alabama. The suspects were charged with 4 counts of reckless murder. More charges will be filed. Going based off of the 4 counts what is the recommended sentencing based on alabama state law?
.
Some general factors that would influence sentencing recommendations include:
• The specifics of the charges (e.g. reckless murder vs. 1st degree murder) and the number of charges. More/lesser charges would impact sentencing.
• Alabama sentencing guidelines which provide ranges for different types of felonies based on offense levels. Reckless murder would likely fall into a higher offense level.
• The criminal history of the offenders. Prior criminal records could increase recommended sentences.
• Circumstances of the crime. Especially aggravating factors could warrant longer sentences.
• Discretion of the judge. Sentencing ultimately comes down to the judge's discretion within the applicable laws and guidelines.
Without knowing the details of the Dadeville shooting case, charges, criminal histories of the offenders, and judge's sentencing philosophy, I cannot determine precise recommended sentences for the 4 reckless murder charges. The sentences could range from many years to potentially life imprisonment, depending on the factors.
The best approach is to review the specific laws on reckless murder sentencing in Alabama, the guidelines, details of the charges and offenders in this case, and decisions in similar previous cases to help determine an appropriate recommendation range for each charge. But there are too many unknowns based on the information provided for me to give more precise recommendations. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
You see a sign on which there is a red circle with a red line 1 point going diagonally from left to right through the circle. What does this mean?
O A. Caution must be taken in making the maneuver shown on the sign
OB. Drivers may not make the maneuver shown on the sign
OC. One should avoid the hazard shown on the sign
OD. Drivers making maneuver shown on the sign
Answer:
OB. Drivers may not make the maneuver shown on the sign
Explanation:
This is the universal "no" sign. So don't do anything that has a red arrow shown diagonally presented in a circle.
For eg, no smoking, no left turns, or no photography permitted as shown in picture below.
This chapter discusses that drug use can have both positive and negative results, depending on how it is used and why. Do you think a drug that is currently illegal but is found to have some positive results in the medical field should be completely
outlawed for any type of use? Think of heroin or cocaine, it is illegal to use or possess in the U.S. but if something positive could come from the use do you think it should be allowed. Explain your answer. 2 cited sources.
I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, but I can provide a balanced perspective on the topic. The question of whether a currently illegal drug with potential medical benefits should be completely outlawed for any type of use is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach.
On one hand, it is important to consider the potential benefits that such drugs can have in the medical field. For example, studies have shown that heroin-assisted treatment can be an effective option for treating opioid addiction (Kerr et al., 2017). Similarly, cocaine has been used as a local anesthetic in eye surgery and is still used in some countries for that purpose (Narvaez, 2014). Banning the use of these drugs outright may prevent patients from receiving effective treatment for their medical conditions.
On the other hand, legalizing drugs with a history of abuse and addiction carries significant risks. It may lead to increased availability, misuse, and addiction, especially among vulnerable populations such as teenagers and low-income individuals. Additionally, drug legalization may send the wrong message to society that drug use is acceptable and may lead to an increase in crime rates, accidents, and public health costs.
In conclusion, while the potential medical benefits of currently illegal drugs should be considered, the risks of legalization should also be carefully evaluated. A thorough analysis of the benefits and risks, as well as the potential impact on public health and safety, should guide any decision regarding drug policy.
Can some one help me plz
Answer:
DBACE
Explanation:
Adversary systemjurymotionperemptory challengeplaintiffWhich of the following terms indicate that a law enforcement officer has reasons to believe that a law is being violated?
A reasonable doubt
B probable cause
C voluntary consent
D. search and seizure
E affidavit
Answer:
b
Explanation:
took the test lel
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Answer:
Develop an argument that explains if the framers of the U.S. Constitution would approve of the current balance of power between of the national government relative to that of the states.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information
o At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:
U.S. Constitution
Brutus 1
United States v. Lopez
Marbury v. Madison
o Use a second piece of evidence from another foundational document from the list or from your study of the structure of American government.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT an element of a crime?
A. Mens Rea
B. Concurrence
C. Collaboration
D. Cause in result of harm
Collaboration is not an element of a crime. Collaboration refers to working together and is not directly related to the essential components of a crime. Therefore, option C is correct.
The elements of a crime typically consist of four key components.
First, there is the actus reus, which refers to the guilty act or the physical action that constitutes the offense. Second, there is the mens rea, which represents the mental state or intent of the offender. Third, there must be a concurrence, meaning that the act and the intent must align or occur simultaneously. Finally, there must be a causation, demonstrating that the actions of the offender directly resulted in the harm or illegal outcome. These elements collectively form the basis for determining criminal liability and culpability.Learn more about elements of crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/11221577
#SPJ6
3
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the customer segmentation strategies to their related scenarios.
demographic segmentation
behavioral segmentation
psychographic segmentation
geographic segmentation
a luxury brand of automobile that appeals to a person's need for prestige
a company marketing their range of raincoats and umbrellas just before the
onset of spring
a company marketing a range of kitchen appliances to affluent women
a gym offering annual memberships to regular customers at cheaper rates
with added benefits
PLEASE HELP!
The above prompt is about marketing with a focus on segmentation, demographics and psychographics.
What are the matched pairs?The matched pairs are given as follows:
demographic segmentation - a company marketing a range of kitchen appliances to affluent womenbehavioral segmentation - a gym offering annual memberships to regular customers at cheaper rates with added benefitspsychographic segmentation - a luxury brand of automobile that appeals to a person's need for prestigegeographic segmentation - a company marketing their range of raincoats and umbrellas just before the onset of springMarket segmentation in marketing is the practice of breaking a large consumer or corporate market, often consisting of present and future customers, into sub-groups of consumers based on shared criteria.
Learn more about segmentation at:
https://brainly.com/question/27993208
#SPJ1
Did you know anything about Gerrymandering? Was any of this information surprising to you? Why or why not?
Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing election districts to favour a certain political party. Although the magnitude and effect may not be shocking, they often are.
I am aware of gerrymandering, which is the act of influencing an election constituency's borders in order to favour one political party or organisation over another. This is done to make sure that the ruling party can continue to win most of the elections.
This did not come as a surprise to me considering that gerrymandering has long been a contentious topic in many nations, including the US. Even yet, the amount to which it is applied and the effects it has on representation and democracy may be surprising.
Learn more about Gerrymandering:
https://brainly.com/question/29553293
#SPJ1
The Bill of Rights' First Amendment is concerned with such liberties as _____.
freedom of property ownership
freedom of speech
freedom of travel
freedom of life
Answer:
Freedom of Speech
Explanation:
Freedom of speech
In 7 to 10 complete sentences, tell me what does leadership mean to you
Answer:
it means power. dignity. no rest and all hard work. Leadership is all responsibility that you are carrying either your leading your country or leading a group of friends. You must be able to keep the pressure under control and do what needs to be done. Leadership has many aspects today in life but in the end leadership is what we follow today in the usa.
Explanation:
What war prompted the U.S. to deal with emergency situations and learn effective measures that had implications for
the future?
Vietnam war
Civil war
American revolution
Mexican American war
The war that prompted the U.S. to deal with emergency situations and learn effective measures that had implications for the future is A. Vietnam War.
What was the Vietnam War?The Vietnam War was a long, costly and divisive conflict. The war pitted the communist government of North Vietnam against South Vietnam.
The war was sponsored by Communist North Korea as a way of unifying North and South Vietnam to become Communist Vietnam. But the United States wanted to prevent this from happening.
Thus, the Vietnam war more than the Civil War, the American Revolution, or the Mexican American War, prompted the U.S. to deal with emergency situations and learn effective measures that had implications for the future.
Learn more about the Vietnam War at https://brainly.com/question/182779
Complete the sentence. The ________ of a tread can help determine the speed of a vehicle.
size
wear
depth
pattern
The pattern of a tread can help determine the speed of a vehicle.
Hence, Option D is correct
What do you mean by speed of a Vehicle?
The traction, handling, and top speed of a vehicle are all influenced by the tread pattern of the tires and how well they hold the road.The price and a number of other features, like grip, noise level, comfort while driving, and look, will be influenced by the tire width. Wider tires are typically better since they reduce rolling resistance, which in turn reduces fuel consumption.Aquaplaning is prevented by the inner tire tread, which is in charge of removing water (hydroplaning). Firm tread blocks are present in the outer tire tread to increase lateral rigidity, lessen interior noise, and provide a firm grip in turns and on dry terrain.To know more about speed here
https://brainly.com/question/26046491
#SPJ1
is it likely for a case to make it all the way to the supreme court?
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
What is a legal custom
Answer: A legal custom is the established pattern of behavior that can be objectively verified within a particular social setting. A claim can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted by law".
Give five examples to help explain how sports and physical education overlaps
The fine for a first time littering ticket is
up to:
$250
what did jesus do when the little children come to him
When Jesus said,"Suffer little children,and forbid them not,to come up to me,"He was reaching out to a segment of society that was thought to be insignificant . Childern,in their weakness and vulnerability,have much to teach us as adults.As we grow,the hardness of the world often makes our hearts callous.
How do avidar’s values and approaches to humans resources management support Lob’s business success?
Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management
1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.
2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.
3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.
4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.
By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.
Know more about Human resources management here:
https://brainly.com/question/14419086
#SPJ8
Congress writes an emergency bill to give money to help victims of the tornado. This is an example of?
Answer: State and local emergency fund management
Explanation:
1. Define the following terms:
a. divine right
b. limited government
c. Constitution
d. rule of law
e. amendment
f. double jeopardy
g. Federalism
h. Congress
i. popular sovereignty
j. checks and balances
k. separation of powers
l. Republic
m. unitary system
n. Electoral College
o. Confederation
p. parliamentary system
q. Legislative branch
r. Executive branch
s. Judicial branch
t. Bureaucracy
u. judicial review
v. due process
w. Jurisdiction
x. Apportionment
y. Census
z. Gerrymandering
aa. Lobbying
bb. judicial activism
cc. judicial restraint
dd. Supremacy Clause
2. What does pleading the 5th mean?
3. What is the length of a presidential term?
4. Which branch of government has the power to tax and collect revenue (the power of the purse)?
5. Basic steps for a bill to become a law.
6. Describe two ways the Founding Fathers limited the power of the federal government or limited the
power of the branches of the federal government.
In the past, the idea of divine right was crucial in defending kings' absolute power and their status as the ultimate repository of political influence.
Some of the terms' definitions are as follows:
1. divine rights- The idea or theory of divine right holds that a monarch's capacity to rule is directly delegated from a higher power, usually a deity or God. It implies that the monarch has an unquestionable, unrestricted power to rule that is not subject to scrutiny or restraint by earthly authority or laws.
2. Limited government- The term "limited government" refers to a system in which the government's authority and ability to act are constrained by statute or by the constitution. To safeguard individual liberties and avoid the concentration of unrestrained power in the hands of the governing elite, limited government is the main goal.
3. constitution- A constitution is a fundamental set of values and guidelines that explains a nation's rights and obligations, creates the foundation of its government, and specifies its powers and responsibilities.
Learn more about divine right, from:
brainly.com/question/28344378
#SPJ1
Please Hurry
If a judge bases his or her final decision on existing law, it is an example of common law; what is the decision called that a judge arrives at from a case with unique circumstances?
A.common law version 2
B.a new law
C.a judgment
D.a civic law
Answer: C
Explanation: He is going off of a different law but not the hole thing It is a judgement
first state to legalize gay marriage in united states
Answer:
Massachusetts
Massachusetts became the first United States jurisdiction to license and recognize same-sex marriages beginning May 17, 2004.
Explanation:
The first state to legalize gey marriage in united states is Massachusetts in 2004.
Gey marriage means a marriage between two males, rather than between a male and female.
The legalization of the gey marriage happened following a Supreme Judicial decision in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health.
In conclusion, the first state to legalize gey marriage in united states is Massachusetts in 2004.
Read more about marriage
brainly.com/question/21480067
What would the most difficult part of being a peace officer would be?
How can public opinion polls impact elections?