Simplify the expression 2{5+2(7x11-68)]

Answer:

this is how you solve this equation

Step-by-step explanation:

300= (5x+4)+(2x-14)+(x-10)

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is going to be 10

To determine if a point is on the market supply curve, we need to check if it satisfies both supply functions.

Supply 1: P = 6 + 0.7Q

Supply 2: P = 16 + 0.6Q

Let's evaluate each option:

a. P = 32.00, Q = 61.14

Using supply 1: P = 6 + 0.7(61.14) = 48.80

Using supply 2: P = 16 + 0.6(61.14) = 52.68

Neither supply function matches the given point, so it is not on the market supply curve.

b. P = 11.00, Q = 7.14

Using supply 1: P = 6 + 0.7(7.14) = 10.00

Using supply 2: P = 16 + 0.6(7.14) = 20.28

Neither supply function matches the given point, so it is not on the market supply curve.

c. P = 16, Q = 14.29

Using supply 1: P = 6 + 0.7(14.29) = 15.00

Using supply 2: P = 16 + 0.6(14.29) = 24.57

Both supply functions match the given point, so it is likely on the market supply curve.

d. P = 24.00, Q = 39.05

Using supply 1: P = 6 + 0.7(39.05) = 33.34

Using supply 2: P = 16 + 0.6(39.05) = 39.43

Both supply functions match the given point, so it is likely on the market supply curve.

Based on the analysis, the most likely point that is not on the market supply curve is option a. P = 32.00, Q = 61.14.

Answer:4

Step-by-step explanation:22-4=18-4=14-4=10-4=6=2

Answer:

1 inch

Step-by-step explanation:

It's 1 inch because you minus 20 inch by 19 inch and get 1 inch

The derivative of the given function tan (5x²). cot (2x-7) is 10x.sec²(5x²).cot²(2x-7) - 2tan(5x²).cosec²(2x - 7) using product rule.

What is derivative?

Derivative is the rate of change of a function with respect to a variable.

d/dx tanx = sec²x

d/dx cotx = -cosec²x

What is product rule?

The Product Rule says that the derivative of a product of two functions is the first function times the derivative of the second function plus the second function times the derivative of the first function.

d/dx (u.v) = [d/dx u].v + u.[d/dx v]

According to the given question:

The given function f(x) = tan(5x²).cot(2x - 7)

Differentiating this function with respect to x using product rule

d/dx [tan(5x²).cot(2x - 7)]

= {d/dx [tan(5x²)]}.cot(2x - 7) + tan(5x²).{d/dx cot(2x - 7)}

Now,

d/dx [tan(5x²)] = 10x.sec²(5x²).cot(2x-7)

d/dx cot(2x - 7) = -2cosec²(2x - 7)

Substituting the derivatives in the equation

∴ d/dx [tan(5x²).cot(2x - 7)]

= 10x.sec²(5x²).cot(2x-7).cot(2x - 7) + tan(5x²).{-2cosec²(2x - 7)}

= 10x.sec²(5x²).cot²(2x-7) - 2tan(5x²).cosec²(2x - 7)

Hence the derivative of the given function is

10x.sec²(5x²).cot²(2x-7) - 2tan(5x²).cosec²(2x - 7)

To know more about derivatives visit

https://brainly.com/question/25752367

#SPJ1

Answer:15x3 /=divide 5 = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

because if you do 15x3 it is 45 then you divide it by 5 and get 9 as your answer!

Peter used direct proof method because he gets the answer directly whereas Vivian used direct proof method by contradiction because she first assumed that the answer was wrong and had to prove that the answer was right.

How to carry out Congruence Proofs?

We are told that both peter and Vivian were trying to prove from the attached diagram the statement that;

If ∠2 ≅ ∠3, then ∠1 is supplementary to ∠3.

Now, from the proofs of both of them, we can see that peter used a direct proof because he knew he could get it directly but Vivian utilized another means which was by starting with contradiction to reprove that the answer was correct.

Thus, we can conclude that Peter used direct proof method because he gets the answer directly whereas Vivian used direct proof method by contradiction because she first assumed that the answer was wrong and had to prove that the answer was right

To learn more about supplementary visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27624512

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. sequence

2. series

3. series

4. sequence

5. sequence

6. series

7. sequence

8. sequence

9. series

10. sequence

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps <3

The wοrd "unabated" is used in Narrative οf the Life οf Frederick Dοuglass, An American Slave.

The wοrd "unabated" in this cοntext can be interpreted tο mean "cοntinuing withοut any reductiοn in intensity οr strength." "That cheerful eye, under the influence οf slavery, swοre red with rage; that vice, made all οf sweet accοutrement, changed tο a οne οf harsh and hοrrid discοrd; and that angelic face gave way tο that οf a demοn."

The authοr is describing hοw the slavehοlder's pοwer οver the slaves cοrrupts the wοman's character, turning her previοusly kind demeanοur intο οne οf rage and discοntent. The wοrd "unabated" emphasises hοw persistent and unyielding this transfοrmatiοn is and hοw unlikely it is that it will diminish.

By examining the surrοunding text and cοmmοn usage, I was able tο determine the definitiοn οf the wοrd "unabated." In this sentence, the authοr's descriptiοn οf the slavehοlder's transfοrmatiοn is well-suited tο the wοrd "unabated," which is generally used tο describe sοmething that cοntinues withοut any lοss οf intensity οr strength.

To know more about slavery  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ1

Answer:

1/3 is the slope and if it’s less than or greater to that, then the bottom half of the graph is shaded in.

Answer:

D. 52

Step-by-step explanation:

105/2=52

The middle of 110 and 100 is 105. When you divide that by 2 you get 52.5 or 52. The answer is D

Answer:

D 52 is the answer

Answer:

0.20

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 4 + 6 + 10 = 20 biscuits in the jar

probability of picking a chocolate chip biscuit = 4/20 = 1/5 = 0.20

The graph of the given points form the rectangle is attached below.

Graph:

The graph is defined as the pictorial representation or a diagram that represents data or values in an organized manner.

Given,

The points are (2, 1),(2, 5), (7, 1), and (7, 5).

Here we need to plot the graph and we have to identify whether it will form the rectangle.

First, we have to do the following in order to solve it,

Therefore, the resulting graph is attached below.

To know more about Graph here.

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1

Answer:

37

Step-by-step explanation:

Use Pythagorean Theorem: a²+b²=c² (c is hypotenuse)

35²+12²=1225+144=1369

√1369=37

(Use a calculator :)

Option B, In this situation, when the concentration of extracellular glucose is lower than the concentration currently present in cells, active transport is required.

Active transport, as opposed to simple diffusion or assisted diffusion, uses energy (in the form of ATP) to move molecules up or down a concentration gradient, from a region of low concentration to one of high concentration.

To transfer glucose molecules into the stomach lining cells in spite of the concentration gradient, active transport would be required. This procedure is crucial for preserving the body's glucose homeostasis and guaranteeing that cells have enough glucose for cellular energy generation.

Learn more about active transport at

https://brainly.com/question/29759743

#SPJ4

The predicted sale price of a house that is 2000 sq ft would be $230,887.

Based on the given regression equation Price = 97996.5 + 66.445 Size, we can estimate the sale price of a house with a size of 2000 sq ft. By substituting the value of 2000 for the home size (x) in the equation, we can calculate the predicted price.

To calculate the predicted sale price:

Price = 97996.5 + 66.445 * 2000

Price = 97996.5 + 132890

Price = $230,886.50

Rounded to the nearest dollar, the predicted sale price of a house with a size of 2000 sq ft is $230,887.

The regression equation provides us with a model to estimate the relationship between home size and price. In this case, the intercept term is $97,996.50, which represents the estimated price when the home size is zero (which is not practically meaningful in this context). The slope term of 66.445 suggests that, on average, for every 1 sq ft increase in home size, the price is expected to increase by $66.445.

However, it's important to note that the regression model assumes a linear relationship between home size and price and might not capture all the complexities and factors that influence home prices. Additionally, the R² value of 51% indicates that only 51% of the variability in home prices can be explained by home size, suggesting that other factors beyond size may also play a role.

To know more about sale, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29436143

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

radius r = 10/2 = 5 ft

height h = 5 ft

Volume = πr²h = π(5²)(5) = 125π ≈ 392.7 ft³

Answer:

Ok For A should be 3.50 For 5 Meters which in Centimeter is 500. For B you can get 24 meters of ribbon

Step-by-step explanation:

This is how you do it convert the meters to centimeter then see how much the ribbon cost per centimeter which is 0.007

8 meters to centimeters = 800

0.007 x 800 = 5.60

Then for B 24 Meters to Centimeters = 2,400

0.007 x 2,400 = 16.80

The number of push-ups did sara did during gym class if for every 7 push-ups Dulce can do, Sara can do 6 is 24 push ups.

Number of push ups Dulce can do : number of push ups Sara can do

Let

number of push ups Sara does = x

7 : 6 = 28 : x

7/6 = 28/x

cross product

7 × x = 28 × 6

7x = 168

divide both sides by 7

x = 168/7

x = 24

Therefore, Sara does 24 push ups during the gym class.

Read more on ratio:

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ1

To convert milligrams per liter (mg/L) to micrograms per fluid ounce (µg/fl oz), we can use the conversion factor of 29.5735.

This conversion factor takes into account the difference in volume between a liter and a fluid ounce.

1 fl oz = 29.5735 mL

1 L = 1000 mL

So, to convert from milligrams per liter to micrograms per fluid ounce, we divide by 29.5735 and multiply by 1000:

(mg/L) * 1000 / 29.5735 = (µg/fl oz)

Therefore, to convert a value x from milligrams per liter to micrograms per fluid ounce:

x (µg/fl oz) = x (mg/L) * 1000 / 29.5735

Learn more about fluid ounce here brainly.com/question/15974657

#SPJ4

To calculate the concentrations of all species present in a 0.72 M NH3 solution (Kb=1.8×10−5), we can use the principles of the equilibrium expression for the dissociation of NH3 in water.

NH3 (ammonia) is a weak base that reacts with water to form NH4+ (ammonium) and OH- (hydroxide) ions. The equilibrium expression for this reaction can be written as:

NH3 + H2O ⇌ NH4+ + OH-

Since the initial concentration of NH3 is 0.72 M, we can assume that x mol/L of NH3 will dissociate to form x mol/L of NH4+ and OH-. Therefore, the concentrations of NH4+ and OH- will also be x mol/L.

To calculate the value of x, we can use the Kb expression, which relates the equilibrium constant to the concentrations of the species. In this case, Kb = [NH4+][OH-]/[NH3]. Substituting the known values, we have:

1.8×10−5 = x * x / (0.72 - x)

Solving this equation will give us the value of x, which represents the concentration of NH4+ and OH-. Finally, we can express the concentrations of NH3, NH4+, and OH- using two significant figures, separated by commas, based on the calculated value of x.

Learn more about equation here: brainly.com/question/30130739

#SPJ11

Answer:

b > 15

Step-by-step explanation:

25 1/2 - 1 1/2b < 3

25 1/2 = 51/2 = 25.5

1 1/2 = 3/2 = 1.5

25.5 - 1.5b < 3

-1.5b < -22.5

b > 15

Step-by-step explanation:

\( {3}^{10 - 6} \)

\( = {3}^{4} \)

In reality, however, the two drugs do not differ. This is an example of a Type I errors.

In statistics, a Type I error, also known as a false positive or alpha error, occurs when a null hypothesis that is actually true is rejected. In the context of the given randomized trial, the null hypothesis states that there is no difference between the efficacy of the two drugs.

However, due to random chance or other factors, the trial yielded a statistically significant difference (with a P value < 0.05) between the drugs, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.

In reality, since the two drugs do not actually differ in efficacy, the observed difference is likely due to random sampling variability or experimental error. A Type I error can occur when the significance level (alpha) used in the hypothesis test is set too low, leading to a higher likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis incorrectly.

It is essential to consider Type I errors and carefully interpret the significance of study findings to avoid drawing erroneous conclusions based on statistical significance alone.

To know more about Type I errors, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32609769#

#SPJ11

The probability that Marshall wins a prize on his second spin =  0.1875

Consider an event X = the number of spins until Marshall wins a prize.

Given that a prize wheel with 4 segments of equal size, one of which is labeled winner.

So, the sample space n = 4

For given event x, the possible outcomes = 1

Using the formula of probability,

p = x/n

p = 1/4

p = 0.25

So, the probability of success p = 0.25

q = 1 - p

q = 1 - 0.25

q = 0.75

To find the probability that Marshall wins a prize on his 2nd spin.

Using formula, \(P(X = k) = (1 - p)^{k-1}p\)

For  k = 2,

\(P(X = 2) = (1 - 0.25)^{2-1}\times 0.25\)

P(X = 2) = 0.75 × 0.25

P(X = 2) = 0.1875

Thus, the required probability is  0.1875

Learn more about the probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is a

4/3πr^3

4/3*22/7*5^3

Answer:

x=-3

Step-by-step explanation:

5x+7+3x=-8+3x

Combine like terms

8x+7 = 3x-8

Subtract 3x from each side

8x+7-3x = 3x-8-3x

5x+7 = -8

Subtract 7 from each side

5x+7-7 = -8-7

5x = -15

Divide each side by 5

5x/5 = -15/5

x = -3

Answer:

48 [fliers]

Step-by-step explanation:

Ann starts with 96 fliers. After she posts 1/4 of them, she will have 3/4*96=72 fliers left. She now has 72 remaining flyers. After posting 1/3 of these, she will have 2/3*72=48 fliers left.