Answers
Hampton v. United States (1970) is a lesser-known Supreme Court case that dealt with the admissibility of evidence obtained through a warrantless search. In this case, the defendant, Hampton, was arrested and charged with transporting stolen goods across state lines. The arrest was based on information obtained by an FBI agent during a warrantless search of a warehouse where the stolen goods were stored.
The main issue in Hampton v. United States was whether the officer had probable cause to conduct the warrantless search of the warehouse. The Court found that the officer did have probable cause, based on the information available to him at the time of the search. The officer knew that the warehouse contained items that were recently stolen, and he had reason to believe that the defendant was involved in the theft.
The Court held that the warrantless search of the warehouse was justified because the officer had probable cause to believe that the stolen goods were inside the warehouse and that they would be moved or destroyed if he waited to obtain a warrant. The Court also noted that the officer's actions were reasonable, given the circumstances.
In summary, Hampton v. United States dealt with the admissibility of evidence obtained through a warrantless search based on probable cause. The Court held that the officer had probable cause to conduct the search and that the evidence obtained was admissible in court.
Related Questions
Which type of reaction is shown by this general equation?
Answers
Answer:
Learning Outcomes
Classify a reaction as combination, decomposition, single-replacement, double-replacement, or combustion.
Predict the products and balance a combustion reaction.
Many chemical reactions can be classified as one of five basic types. Having a thorough understanding of these types of reactions will be useful for predicting the products of an unknown reaction. The five basic types of chemical reactions are combination, decomposition, single-replacement, double-replacement, and combustion. Analyzing the reactants and products of a given reaction will allow you to place it into one of these categories. Some reactions will fit into more than one category.
Combination Reactions
A combination reaction, also known as a synthesis reaction, is a reaction in which two or more substances combine to form a single new substance. Combination reactions can also be called synthesis reactions .The general form of a combination reaction is: A+B→AB - (5.3.1)
One combination reaction is two elements combining to form a compound. Solid sodium metal reacts with chlorine gas to product solid sodium chloride.
2Na(s)+Cl2(g)→2NaCl(s)(5.3.2)
Notice that in order to write and balance the equation correctly, it is important to remember the seven elements that exist in nature as diatomic molecules ( H2 , N2 , O2 , F2 , Cl2 , Br2 , and I2 ).
One sort of combination reaction that occurs frequently is the reaction of an element with oxygen to form an oxide. Metals and nonmetals both react readily with oxygen under most conditions. Magnesium reacts rapidly and dramatically when ignited, combining with oxygen from the air to produce a fine powder of magnesium oxide.
2Mg(s)+O2(g)→2MgO(s)(5.3.3)
Decomposition Reactions
A decomposition reaction is a reaction in which a compound breaks down into two or more simpler substances. The general form of a decomposition reaction is:
AB→A+B(5.3.4)
Most decomposition reactions require an input of energy in the form of heat, light, or electricity.
Binary compounds are compounds composed of just two elements. The simplest kind of decomposition reaction is when a binary compound decomposes into its elements. Mercury (II) oxide, a red solid, decomposes when heated to produce mercury and oxygen gas.
2HgO(s)→2Hg(l)+O2(g)(5.3.5)
A reaction is also considered to be a decomposition reaction even when one or more of the products is still a compound. A metal carbonate decomposes into a metal oxide and carbon dioxide gas. For example, calcium carbonate decomposes into calcium oxide and carbon dioxide.
CaCO3(s)→CaO(s)+CO2(g)(5.3.6)
Metal hydroxides decompose on heating to yield metal oxides and water. Sodium hydroxide decomposes to produce sodium oxide and water.
Explanation:
Answer: Synthesis
Explanation: Reactants + energy —> products
A known car dealership had 3 new models stolen. Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties. What FBI report would be MOST helpful in this instance
Answers
If A known car dealership had 3 new models stolen. Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties. What FBI report would be MOST helpful in this instance is: A NIBRS.
What is NIBRS?NIBRS which full meaning is National Incident-Based Reporting System can be defined as the agency whose sole roles and responsibility is to collect detailed information or data on every crime incident.
Based on the given scenario NIBRS is the report that would be MOST helpful in this instance since the Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties.
Therefore If A known car dealership had 3 new models stolen. Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties. What FBI report would be MOST helpful in this instance is: A NIBRS.
The missing options are
A NIBRS
B. Hate Crime Studies
C. LEOKA
D. National Crime Victimization Survey
Learn more about NIBRS here:https://brainly.com/question/17448985
#SPJ1
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses?
Answers
Answer:
Answer Expert Verified The statement that best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses is “Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.”
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. ... He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
WAS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
What is the meaning of the Constitution?A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or another sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.
A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that the state is governed by. It provides an overview of the state's primary institutions and outlines their interrelationships (for example, between the executive, legislature, and judiciary).
The members of the provincial assemblies chosen by the Indian populace formed the Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Constitution. The first president of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Sachidanand Sinha. Eventually, it elected Dr. Rajendra Prasad as president.
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ2
Which of these is FALSE about the chain of custody? * 1 point If the chain of custody is broken, the evidence is often not used in court The chain of custody begins when the piece of evidence is brought to the crime lab Everyone who access the evidence is part of the chain of custody. The purpose of the chain of custody is to ensure that evidence taken from the crime scene is not altered before it is admitted to court
Answers
Answer:
The chain of custody begins when the piece of evidence is brought to the crime lab.
Explanation:
The chain of custody can be defined as a chronology of collecting evidence and the process of protecting the evidence thereafter. The chain of custody is a legal term used to define the documentation of any physical or electronic evidence from the crime scene.
The statement that is not true about the chain of custody from the given options is the second one. The statement is false that the chain of custody begins when evidence is presented in the crime lab rather the chain of custody begins when any piece of evidence is taken under custody, when it is collected by crime investigating officer from the crime scene. The moment any evidence is collected or taken under custody, the chain of custody of begins. Thus second statement from given options about the chain of custody is false.
In what type of weather do collision occur
Answers
law establishing new states to the u.s., territories govern themselves
Answers
The process for establishing new states within the United States is outlined in Article IV, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that new states may be admitted to the Union by an act of Congress.
This process typically involves the territory in question drafting a constitution, gaining the approval of the U.S. Congress, and being ratified by the President. Once a new state has been admitted to the Union, it has the same rights and responsibilities as any other state, including the ability to govern itself.
Once a new state is admitted, it becomes equal in every way to the original 13 states and is entitled to representation in the U.S. Congress.
Learn more about American government and politics here: https://brainly.com/question/28152248
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete, but most probably, the complete question is:
What is the process for establishing new states in the United States, and how do territories govern themselves before becoming states
Police may randomly stop a vehicle to check the driver's license and registration.
True
False
Answers
does the maryland court have personal jurisdiction over the florida defendant? did defendant banks act ethically in this case?
Answers
No,the maryland court doesn't have personal jurisdiction over the florida defendant.
Late court choices on site contacts with Maryland appear to show that having a site alone isn't sufficient. Music Producer Property, LLC v. Sarro, US Locale Court (MD) 2010.
Indeed, even without an actual area, or explicit work site in the Province of Maryland, your business might be dependent upon the purview of Maryland courts. Assuming your organization promotes that it carries on with work all through the US or distinguishes clients with areas in Maryland (regardless of whether you worked for the client as a subcontractor to a bigger organization), you might wind up dependent upon Maryland ward.
On the off chance that there is a sprinkle of connection with Maryland, your organization might wind up liable to its locale. "A court might practice individual ward concerning any reason for activity over an individual domiciled in, presented with process in, coordinated under the laws of, or who keeps up with his chief business environment in the State." Courts and Legal Procedures Article of the Maryland Explained Code, § 6-102(a).
To know more about maryland ,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/1089961
#SPJ4
Define personal characteristics
Answers
Answer:
it is how you characterize your self
Jeff and his coworkers frequently visit a local bar on their way home from their second-shift factory jobs. They are anxious to reach the bar on this particular night because their favorite NFL team is playing. Jeff hopes they will arrive in time to view the fourth quarter of the game. As he enters the bar, he notes a group of noisy, obnoxious rival fans who have had too many drinks. Jeff asks the group to quiet down so he can hear the game. He is immediately approached by members of the group who ask if he wants to make an issue of the game. Before Jeff can answer, one member of the group throws a punch. Within minutes, a full bar brawl ensues. Jeff ends up with a fractured skull, which results in brain damage. What type of lawsuit will Jeff be able to file against his aggressors
Answers
Answer:
Civil
Explanation:
A civil lawsuit is characterized as a judicial process where a person tries to hold another person responsible for an injury to which he or she was a victim, or for some unlawful act. In the case above, we can state that Jeff will try to hold his attacker responsible for the brain damage he has had. If Jeff wins the case, the attacker will have to compensate him for the amount that the court determines. The greater Jeff's damage, the greater the compensation.
TRUE/FALSE. for a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor must show that the employee was acting within the scope of her or his employment; however, the prosecutor need not demonstrate that the employee was acting with the purpose of benefiting the corporation.
Answers
It is true that for a Corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor must show that the employee was acting within the scope of her or his employment however, the prosecutor need not demonstrate that the employee was acting with the purpose of benefiting the corporation.
Corporations can be held criminally accountable for almost any type of crimes so, therefore they cannot be held liable for crimes that were only punishable by a prison sentence.
A corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee then the prosecutor must established that the employee was acting within the scope of her or his employment, employee was acting with the purpose of benefiting the corporation and the act was imputed to the corporation.
Learn more about purpose of corporation click the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/13897560
#SPJ4
A motorist should keep at least ___ feet behind a signaling
Answers
A motorist should keep at least 100 feet behind a signaling.
Drivers, often known as motorists, must pay attention to pedestrians and avoid using bike lanes.
The term "motorists" is frequently used in news reports when discussing groups of drivers, such as all of the drivers in Chicago's downtown or the rural drivers on two-lane highways.
Motorist is another word for "driver," which initially originated in the late 19th century, around the time the first autos did, and originally meant "motor car driver." Motorists need to be alert of pedestrians and stay out of bike lanes.
The word "motorists" frequently appears in news reports when discussing drivers as a group, such as all the motorists in downtown Chicago.
To know more about the Motorist visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1114291
#SPJ9
Do you believe that prisoners inside the jail still enjoy certain types of freedom inside their prison cells?
Answers
Yes, prisoners have limited freedoms within their cells, but their overall freedom is heavily restricted due to incarceration.
Within their cells, prisoners have limited freedoms such as the ability to engage in certain activities and solitude. However, the confining environment of incarceration severely restricts their freedom. While they still have access to basic personal rights they are restricted from moving around and communicating in order to maintain security.
The purpose of this supervised environment is to promote rehabilitation, control inmate behavior and ensure safety. It is critical to understand that each prison and jurisdiction has a different level of freedom. The distinct regulation of inmates lives emphasizes societal boundaries and criminal goals highlighting the distinction between individual freedoms within cells and the broader context of imprisonment.
To know more about prisoners here
brainly.com/question/31358311
#SPJ2
How does the TSA enforce security regulations on
airports? Are there any limits to this enforcement and what are the
penalties for non-compliance?
Answers
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.
The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.
To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562
#SPJ11
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime
Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.
What is a law enforcement agency?A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328441
#SPJ2
Most illegal immigrants come from which country?
Answers
Mexico has been identified as the country from which the largest number of illegal immigrants come, particularly to the United States.
Mexico refers to a country that has been identified as a significant source of illegal immigrants, particularly in relation to the United States. Situated in North America, Mexico shares a border with the United States, making it geographically accessible for migration.
Economic factors, including limited job opportunities and lower wages in Mexico, often drive individuals to seek better prospects across the border.
Political and social factors, such as violence, corruption, and instability, also contribute to migration flows. The complex interplay of these factors makes Mexico a notable origin country for illegal immigration.
Learn more about immigrants here:
https://brainly.com/question/28791683
#SPJ6
t/f until the 1990s, identifying the blood type of a sample was the best that forensic scientists could do in terms of linking a blood sample to a particular person.
Answers
However, with advancements in DNA analysis and the development of DNA profiling techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, forensic scientists gained a more powerful tool for linking biological samples to specific individuals. DNA profiling surpassed blood typing as the gold standard for forensic identification in the 1990s and has since revolutionized the field of forensic science, enabling more accurate and precise identification of individuals from biological samples such as blood, saliva, hair, and other tissues.
Must you have clear evidence to put away a criminal? Or can you have some evidence but not as valuable.
(What kind of evidence puts away a criminal)
Answers
When is the President most likely to use an executive order to make importan policy
Answers
Answer:
When congress can not reach a compromise
Explanation:
Which country had the first constitution in the world?
Answers
Answer:
San Marino
Explanation:
The Republic of San Marino is considered to hold the world's oldest constitution, which came into force on October 8, 1600. The Constitution is a set of six Latin texts known as “The Statutes of 1600.” It is thought to be the world's oldest surviving national constitution.
which is the most important idea that should be embraced?
Answers
A copy of Trotha's Extermination Order survives in the Botswana National Archives. The order states "every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women or children, I will drive them back to their people [to die in the desert] or let them be shot at."
The training that most law enforcement officers receive includes knowledge cultural diversity true or false
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
which statement best describes the difference between science and philosophy?
OA
Philosophers study human behavior whereas scientists study the natural world.
B.
Science is based on facts whereas philosophy deals with opinions.
Philosophers apply logical reasoning whereas scientists do not.
D.
Scientists gather and analyze empirical data whereas philosophers do not.
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
science is based on proven philosophies while philosophies ain't proven
#18 Which of the following statements about drinking alcohol and driving is true?
If you are a very careful driver, you will be able to drive safely after drinking alcohol.
If you have more than 5 years of driving experience, you will be able to drive safely after drinking alcohol.
No one can drink alcohol and drive safely, even if they have many years of driving experience.
Answers
Even if they have a lot of driving experience, no one can drink alcohol and drive safely, notwithstanding what is said in the literature.
When alcohol is consumed, what is the first thing that is impacted?Your brain is affected by alcohol before your kidneys, lungs, liver, and brain. Age, gender, weight, and the type of alcohol all have an impact on how it affects your body.
How does drinking and driving affect a person's ability to make decisions?The findings of the experiment showed that drinking had an impact on several areas of driving, including attitude, judgement, vigilance, perception, reaction, and controlling. Higher BAC levels would result in higher accident rates, according to the examination of accident rate.
To know more about drink alcohol visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/14908518
#SPJ1
to protect yourself from drivers who do not carry the legally required amount of insurance, you should:
Answers
To protect yourself from drivers without enough insurance, carry uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage and verify other driver's insurance.
To protect yourself from drivers who do not carry the legally required amount of insurance, there are several steps you can take:
1. Carry uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage: This kind of insurance will cover your costs in the event that you are engaged in a mishap with a not driver and have sufficient protection to cover the harm.
2. Verify the other driver's insurance: After an accident, it is essential to get the other driver's accident data and confirm that they have the legitimately required measure of insurance. You can do this by reaching their insurance agency or checking with your state's branch of engine vehicles.
3. Take legal action: In the event that you are engaged in an accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver and your protection doesn't completely cover your costs, you might need to make a legitimate move against the driver to recuperate your misfortunes.
4. Drive defensively: While you have no control over the activities of different drivers, you can decrease your gamble of being engaged in a mishap by driving protectively, submitting to transit regulations, and avoiding different vehicles out and about.
By making these steps, you can shield yourself from drivers who don't convey the legitimately required measure of insurance and limit the monetary effect of an accident.
Learn more about underinsured motorist coverage:
https://brainly.com/question/29409435
#SPJ4
Help me please I need to pass
Answers
What does the Fourth Amendment protect against?
Answers
Answer:
protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government
Explanation:
google :))
an agent who purports to act for a legally nonexistent principal is personally liable when the agent knows or has reason to know the principal does not exist.
Answers
An agent is personally liable to all third parties for any transactions that take place even though they are aware the principal does not legally have the right to exist.
Being "personally liable" means that, due to your ownership of the business, a plaintiff who obtains a court judgment against your company may be able to satisfy it using your personal assets, such as your bank account, house, or car.
When an agent contracts on behalf of a principal but withholds the name of the principal, the principal is responsible for the agent's contract. However, the unnamed principle must have existed at the time of the agreement, and the activities must have fallen within the agent's purview of authority.
Whether an agent is working on behalf of an ambiguous principal affects the principal's rights and obligations under contracts made by that agent.
To know more about liable click here
brainly.com/question/15244986
#SPJ4
Were prosecutors influenced in their decision by Mayweather's wealth and fame? Did Mayweather benefit from hiring expensive, prominent attorneys to defend him?