the definition of _____ states: a partnership in which two or more companies,often from different countries, join to undertake a major project.

Answer:

Explanation:

Which expression could be used to determine the area of the triangle? A triangle has a base of 2 and three-fourths and height of StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction. One-half + 2 and three-fourths + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction (2 and three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) One-half (2 and three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) One-half (2) (three-fourths) (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction)

Answer:

103/39

Explanation:

Equipment is used in violation to lower emissions according to the Clean Water Act.

Any violation of an individual's right, including those related to physical and mental well-being, moral integrity, and respect for personal liberties or privacy, is considered a violation of their personal rights. They consequently relate to all of a person's overall physical, emotional, and social characteristics.

Genocide, torture, & arbitrary detention all constitute violations of civil and political rights. These infractions frequently take place throughout periods of conflict and when they cross over with rules governing armed conflict, it is characterized as a war crime.

To know more about violation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9365867

#SPJ4

The part of the Federal Aviation Regulations originally called for the inspection of carry-on baggage and screening of airline passengers is FAR Part 108 (option a).

1. The Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) is a set of rules and regulations governing civil aviation in the United States.

2. FAR Part 108 specifically addresses security inspections for airline passengers and their carry-on baggage.

3. This regulation outlines the requirements for screening passengers and inspecting their belongings to ensure the safety and security of air travel.

4. It covers various aspects of security measures, including the use of screening equipment, protocols for identifying prohibited items, and procedures for handling potential threats.

5. The objective of FAR Part 108 is to maintain a high level of safety and security within the aviation industry by preventing unauthorized items from being brought onto aircraft.

6. Compliance with FAR Part 108 is mandatory for all airlines operating within the United States.

7. It is important for airlines, airport authorities, and security personnel to adhere to the guidelines outlined in FAR Part 108 to maintain the safety and trust of passengers.

8. Therefore, if you are looking for the specific part of the Federal Aviation Regulations that originally called for the inspection of carry-on baggage and screening of airline passengers, it is FAR Part 108.

For more such questions on Federal Aviation Regulations, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24158511

#SPJ8

Answer:

Christian

Dydyducruehfydfdrr

The primary concern of correctional officers today is the effective rehabilitation of inmates.

The primary concern of correctional officers today is the effective rehabilitation of inmates. Rehabilitation refers to the process of assisting offenders in developing the necessary skills and mindset to reintegrate into society and lead a law-abiding life. Correctional officers play a crucial role in this process, as they not only maintain safety and order within the facility, but also support and encourage inmates to engage in various programs and services designed to promote personal growth and development.
These programs may include educational courses, vocational training, substance abuse treatment, and mental health services. Correctional officers help facilitate inmates' participation in such activities by creating a structured and secure environment, monitoring their progress, and providing guidance when needed. By fostering a positive atmosphere for rehabilitation, correctional officers contribute to reducing recidivism rates and enhancing public safety.

To know more about rehabilitation visit: https://brainly.com/question/32155632

#SPJ11

Answer:

an illegal substance

Explanation:

It is true, The basic rule in observing hand signals given by german police officers is that traffic parallel to the outstretched arms of the officer may proceed.

German police officers' hand signals generally mean that traffic should go forward in a straight line parallel to their extended arms. According to German legislation, every car must include a first aid kit, a portable red reflector triangle, and at least two safety jackets (reflective vests). The triangle must be positioned 200 metres behind any stopped vehicle on the autobahn & 100 metres behind any other vehicle.

Driving and overtaking are done on the left in Germany. Vehicles on the right may pass those on the left when there are two or more lanes of traffic travelling in the same direction and there are queues of heavy traffic.

To know more about German legislation:

brainly.com/question/1061130

#SPJ4

The scenario is an example of The concerned citizens present evidence at a city council meeting showing that additional lighting in parks prevents crime .

Option C is correct .

A person who is a member of a country and has rights because he was born or entitled to it, or lives in a particular city.

Concerned Citizens are participating members of the political community. Citizenship is obtained by fulfilling national, state, or local legal requirements. A state grants its citizens certain rights and privileges. In return, concerned citizens are expected to obey the laws of their country and defend the country against enemies.

Being a concerned citizen of a country has many legal advantages, such as voting rights, the right to hold public office, social security, health services, public education, permanent residency, and property rights, depending on the country. Around including land, or employment.

Learn more about concerned citizen :

brainly.com/question/25656843

#SPJ1

Answer:

Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly

Explanation:

The correct answer for the given question is (A) Nominating federal judges - Issuing executive orders

Formal powers are those explicitly granted to the President by the Constitution or laws passed by Congress. Examples of formal powers include nominating federal judges, making treaties, and vetoing legislation. On the other hand, informal powers are not explicitly granted by the Constitution or laws, but are derived from the President's role as a leader and commander-in-chief. Examples of informal powers include issuing executive orders and using the media to shape public opinion. In this comparison, nominating federal judges is a formal power, while issuing executive orders is an informal power. Both types of powers are important in shaping the President's agenda and carrying out the duties of the office.

Learn more about legislation :

https://brainly.com/question/29812215

#SPJ1

In Siracusano v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. 131 S.Ct. 1309 (2011), the case involved a pharmaceutical company, Matrixx Initiatives, and allegations of securities fraud.

Facts: The plaintiffs claimed that Matrixx failed to disclose information regarding the potential side effects of its cold remedy product, Zicam. Specifically, they argued that Matrixx failed to disclose reports of users losing their sense of smell after using Zicam.

Issue: The legal issue before the court was whether Matrixx had a duty to disclose the reports of adverse events related to its product, and if failure to disclose constituted securities fraud under the federal securities laws.

Rule: The court applied the "materiality" standard under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This standard requires companies to disclose information that would be important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

Analysis: The court concluded that Matrixx's failure to disclose the adverse event reports was indeed material information that could have influenced a reasonable investor's decision to invest in the company. The court reasoned that adverse events of this nature could impact the company's reputation and financial performance. The court also emphasized that the materiality of information should be determined by an objective assessment, rather than relying on the company's subjective belief of what information is important.

Conclusion: The court held that Matrixx's failure to disclose the adverse event reports constituted securities fraud. They found that the information was material and that Matrixx had a duty to disclose it to investors. Therefore, the court allowed the plaintiffs' claims to proceed.

To know more about allegation of fraud visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32985991

#SPJ11

Human rights cover a wide range of freedoms, such as the right to work and receive an education, the freedom from slavery and torture, the right to freedom of speech.

To learn more about human rights refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/1261546

#SPJ1

Answer:

Severity and Tenacity

Explanation:

Common law consists of the present day British court. The transgressions are generally based on severity and paying the right consequence.

Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the decision of either a jury or a judge, that a person accused is not guilty of the crime for which he has been tried

I hope this is what your kind of looking for!

sorry if it isn't!

Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial; the accused is also referred to as the defendant. A person is declared innocent of the offence for which they have been convicted in court upon being found not guilty by a jury or a judge.

A court's official decision establishing the relative rights and claims of the parties to a lawsuit. The court's constitutional right to hear a case and make a decision.

Moral judgements about what is right or wrong in character traits, such as virtues or vices. Moral judgments about what is right or wrong in action. Moral judgments about what is good or evil in people.

A judgment is the ultimate determination of a court or tribunal. Following the judges' review of all relevant evidence from the legal trial as well as of all rights and obligations, the plaintiff and defendant will get the final verdict.

Thus, Formally accused of committing a crime but has not yet been put on trial.

For more information about judgment, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2890222

#SPJ6

Answer:

It's a survey.

Explanation:

Public opinion poll is a humane research survey of public from a particular sample.

Answer:

It is a survey used for human research.

Answer:

francis blair's newspaper, the globe, portrayed the diplomatic struggle for the oregon territory as a fight between democracy and monarchy, the same struggle that characterized the american revolution.

If someone uses a credit card only once, then only ever pays the minimum payment, They will pay it off eventually, but have higher interest payments.  Option C

Generally, The cost of borrowing money is represented by interest payments. In addition to paying back the principal on a loan, the borrower is responsible for making these additional payments.

When you lend money to someone with the expectation of receiving interest in return, the amount of money you receive in addition to the principal sum you lent is referred to as the interest payment.

If you merely make the required minimum payment on your credit card each month, you may have more money in your pocket at the end of each month; nevertheless, the total amount that you will have paid off will be far more than your initial balance. In addition, if you merely make the minimum payment each month, you will be in debt for a much longer period of time.

Read more about interest payments.

https://brainly.com/question/2591679

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. has taken an oath of service

Explanation:

Just took the assignment and i hope this helps somone :)

Answer:

The cultural transmission theory is an explanation emphasizing transmission of criminal behavior through socialization; views delinquency as socially learned behavior transmitted from one generation to the next in disorganized urban areas.

Explanation:

When actual demand exceeds a reasonable error, it should be investigated to discover the cause of the error is the true statement. (A)

Forecast error refers to the difference between predicted demand and actual demand. It is essential to measure forecast error to determine the accuracy of the forecast and identify any patterns or biases that may be present.

When the actual demand exceeds a reasonable error, it is an indication that there may be issues with the forecast, such as incorrect assumptions or inadequate data. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the cause of the error to make necessary adjustments and improve the forecast's accuracy in the future.  (A)

Forecasts should also be tracked regularly to identify trends and patterns, evaluate the effectiveness of forecasting methods, and make any necessary adjustments to ensure accurate predictions.

To know more about Forecast error  click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15173326#

#SPJ11

The theory against prior restriction was explicitly adopted as constitutional law by the Supreme Court in a significant case, making it the first time in legal history.

The Supreme Court's adoption of the theory against prior restraint as constitutional law in the relevant case set a significant legal standard in US history. Instead of punishing the speaker after the fact, prior restraint refers to government efforts to suppress or prevent speech before it is voiced.

With the Court's decision in this case, the doctrine was for the first time expressly acknowledged and applied as a key component of free expression. The protection of free speech in the US has been significantly impacted by this ruling, which also served as the basis for numerous later court conflicts involving free speech and censorship.

Learn more about Supreme Court:

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

The correct question will be: What did the Supreme Court adopt the theory against prior restraint?

C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court

An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.

To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here

https://brainly.com/question/33718034

#SPJ11

Copyright is the form of legal protection that applies to original songs. Copyright is a type of intellectual property right that grants the creator of an original work, such as a song, the exclusive rights to control and use that work.

When it comes to original songs, copyright protection kicks in the moment the music is formed in a fixed form, such as being written down or recorded.

This means that the songwriter owns the copyright to their music from the minute it is written, with no need for any official registration or application process (though registering the copyright can bring further benefits).

The creator of a music has several exclusive rights under copyright. These rights include the ability to reproduce the song, make copies of it, publicly perform it, and develop derivative works based on it.

For such more question on Copyright:

https://brainly.com/question/22089522

#SPJ11

Answer:

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor encouraged her staff to enjoy whitewater rafting, Mexican take-out brunch and tours of the Smithsonian. Justice Stephen Breyer loves to read French manuscripts and cultivated his distaste for footnotes during his clerkship to Arthur Goldberg. Such details were plentiful as Professor John Feerick introduced Justice O'Connor and her former colleague Justice Breyer to a well-heeled audience of lawyers and law students at Fordham Law School yesterday morning.

The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.

Sally Rider, Director of the William Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona, kicked things off with a series of questions. Why, she asked O'Connor, did she decide to convene this conference on judicial independence in the first place?

O'Connor said she remembered seeing  "Impeach Earl Warren" signs in New Mexico and Arizona when she was growing up, and said that in her final years on the Supreme Court, attacks on judges increased, including proposals for mass impeachments of judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case, or proposals to cut judicial terms short, or a particularly disconcerting movement towards "Jail4Judges," a campaign to allow citizen panels to review rulings from the bench, with the ability to even imprison—as the name tantalizingly implies—those who made bad decisions. These developments were "very depressing," she said, and so she decided to use her retirement to call attention to these attacks on judges.

"An independent judiciary is an essential bedrock principle, and we're losing it."  The reason was in part the fact that civics and government are not a requirement for high school graduation. "One third of Americans can't name the three branches of government, but two thirds can name a judge on American Idol!"

Money has been pouring in to state judicial elections in recent years, including races for State Supreme Court justices. A 2004 campaign for a seat on the Illinois Supreme Court brought in a record-setting $9.3 million in political contributions, including hundreds of thousands of dollars from State Farm, a company with a case pending before the court. And just recently,  Wisconsin voters were subjected to over 11,000 televised campaign ads in the weeks before their state's Supreme Court race, over ninety percent of which were purchased by special interest groups (racking up a bill of well over 3.6 million dollars). Said O'Connor, "We put cash in the courtrooms, and it's just wrong." She then pointed to the room of lawyers and students. "You should take this seriously." (A later panel backed up O'Connor's concerns. New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak, Brennan Center attorney James Sample and Professor Michael Dimino discussed evidence that judges tend to rule in favor of their campaign contributors.)

She went on. "No other nation in the world elects judges." She pointed to Georgina Woods, the chief justice of Ghana, sitting in the front row, as if to illustrate her point.

"Why are we tolerating this? What are we going to do about it?" Then, seeming to remember that the initial question posed to her several minutes before was "why did you convene this conference," she added, "That's why," and sat back in her chair. The audience laughed and applauded.

Breyer took the floor next. Keeping state courts impartial is a major issue, but try talking about it with people "and they're asleep after five minutes." He recounted a trip to Russia he had made when serving as an appellate judge for the First Circuit after he was appointed by Carter. Meeting with Russian judges from across the country, he was surprised to hear their accounts of "telephone justice," when the party boss calls and tells judges which way to vote. "They asked me, ‘do you have telephone justice in the United States,' and I had to explain to them that no, the President wouldn't call you. He'd be crazy to do that."

Explanation:

A legally acceptable ID has this characteristic: a. physical description of the holder.

ID which full meaning is identification can be defined as what tend to help identify a person as this identification tend to includes  the physical feature or characteristic of the holder and the Id must be issued by a government agency.

The ID  as well must includes the following:

Based on this a legally acceptable ID must includes physical description of the holder.

Therefore we can  conclude that the correct option is A.

Learn more about identity here:https://brainly.com/question/11653491

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. Support predictability

Explanation:

Predictable daily routines support young children in knowing what to expect and what is expected of them, leading to fewer disruptive behaviors. A consistent daily schedule and step-by-step routines give children a predictable day.