Answer:
c
Explanation:
The First Amendment provides that Congress make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms.
What happens if every juror does not agree on the verdict?
If the jurors cannot agree on a verdict, a hung jury results, leading to a mistrial. The case is not decided, and it may be tried again at a later date before a new jury. Or the plaintiff or government may decide not to pursue the case further and there will be no subsequent trial.
-BBBM
a lack of diversity is harmful because?
Answer: It can cause hostility in an environment.
However, over-diversifying your workplace can also cause just as much hostility. It's good to only let those who fit the job description perfectly and who can help the company.
Investigating careers. Answer quick, 80 points.
One of the main issues pre-school teachers face is helping kids do which of the following?
A. be away from their parents
B. learn a different language
C. pass standardized tests
D. graduate pre-school
Answer:
Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.
What was a controversy surrounding for Amy Coney Barrett in her nomination
Answer:
rbg's dying wish was for her seat to be filled after the election. amy coney barret filled her seat just a few days before the election causing many Americans to get mad due to the fact it is disrespecting rbg.
Explanation:
self explanatory
• Name and explain TWO laws/legislation that protect citizens against human trafficking
Should the Kraemers have to pay the full face amount to Mrs. Leber? Why
why not?
because she wants to
Domestic violence may increase the likelihood of homelessness for all of the following reasons, EXCEPT
O A
OB.
O C
O D.
the danger forces people to leave their current home.
the victims often cannot afford separate housing.
the shelters designated for victims are often full.
the abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction.
The correct answer is option (d) the abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction.
Domestic violence is a complex issue that can significantly increase the likelihood of homelessness for its victims. Here are the explanations for the other three options:
a. The danger forces people to leave their current home: Domestic violence often involves physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, creating an unsafe environment for the victims. To protect themselves and their children, victims may be forced to flee their homes and seek safety elsewhere, sometimes without adequate resources or support networks.
b. The victims often cannot afford separate housing: Many victims of domestic violence face financial limitations, as their abusers may exert control over financial resources or prevent them from working. This financial dependency makes it challenging for victims to secure separate housing and maintain their independence.
c. The shelters designated for victims are often full: Domestic violence shelters provide temporary refuge for victims seeking safety and support. Unfortunately, due to the prevalence of domestic violence, these shelters often operate at full capacity, leaving many victims without immediate access to a safe place to stay.
d. The abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction: This statement does not directly contribute to an increased likelihood of homelessness for victims of domestic violence. While substance abuse can be a factor in some cases of domestic violence, it does not directly impact the likelihood of homelessness for the victims themselves.
It is important to recognize the complexities of domestic violence and its impact on homelessness. By understanding the reasons behind homelessness resulting from domestic violence, we can work towards developing comprehensive support systems and interventions to help victims rebuild their lives and secure safe and stable housing. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about Domestic violence here:
https://brainly.com/question/31836260
#SPJ8
How does eminent domain affect citizens rights
Which of the following is NOT an obvious racial determination?
-Cross-section shape
-Pigmentation
-Hair diameter
-Cuticle thinness
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's cross-section shape
Racial essentialism is the belief that persons of different racial and ethnic groupings have distinct characteristics and behaviors. Biological determinism is the concept that race is a hereditary reality that controls our actions.
Option D is not an absolute racial determination, the correct answer,
The not so obvious racial determinationThe racial determination can be obviously determined from cross-sectional shapes, pigmentation, and hair diameters, but the cuticles are closely related to your finger-toe nails, which is not a distinct determination to be profound.
Therefore, cuticle thinness is not an obvious determination of race.
For more information about racial determination, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/24723946
Gumball says...
"Uh, if the food enters your body and exits it while it's still in the supermarket, it's technically not stealing."
Is he correct or not? Explain why?
It is untrue to say that if food enters your body and then leaves it while it is still in the store, it is not technically theft.
What is stealing or theft?In order to deprive the legitimate owner of something, theft is the act of taking another person's goods or services without that person's knowledge or agreement.
For several crimes against property, including larceny, burglary, embezzlement, extort, blackmail, or receiving stolen items, the word "theft" is also used as a synonym or informal shorthand.
While theft is defined broadly in some countries, larceny is regarded to be synonymous with stealing in others. The term "thief" can refer to a person who commits an act of theft.
Learn more about stealing or theft, from:
brainly.com/question/14896762
#SPJ1
I am trying to find a job involved with helping people. I have researched a (rn) registered nurse and a contract medic. I also was looking into like firefighter and police but didn't know what jobs would best suit me.
what is the precedent to your right to privacy in public schools
Answer:
Disability rights. Public schools are prohibited by federal law from discriminating against people with disabilities, and cannot deny them equal access to academic courses, field trips, extracurricular activities, school technology, and health services.
The first major difference between public and private safety providers has to do with who they:
hire.
host.
serve.
pay.
Answer:
Serve
Explanation:
Tell me if I got it wrong pls:)
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A.
a simple majority of Congress
B.
the president
C.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
A two-thirds majority of Congress can propose an amendment to the Constitution. Thus option (D) is correct.
What is constitution?A constitution is a fundamental set of rules and principles that establishes the basis of governance and outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens in a country or organization.
The constitution is often seen as a foundational document that establishes the norms and principles of a society, and serves as a source of authority for the government and citizens alike.
The congress can propose an amendment to the Constitution but is should be passed by two-thirds majority of Congress. Therefore, option (D) is correct.
Learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29775576
#SPJ1
Please help will mark brainliest
A. The bill of right
I’m like 95% sure
what were the political parties of Pan Am Flight 103 (1988)
The political parties of Pan Am Flight 103 (1988) were the ruling government of the United States and the government of Libya.
What is Pan Am Flight 103 (1988)?Pan Am Flight 103 was an everyday planned Pan Am transatlantic flight from Frankfurt to Detroit with a stopover in London and also in New York City. The transatlantic art of the way was operated by Clipper Maid of the Seas, a Boeing 747-121 registered N739PA.
Pan Am flight 103 operated and exploded in Lockerbie, Scotland, on December 21, 1988, as a result of a bomb that got exploded. All 259 lives on board were perished, and 11 individuals on the ground also died.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about Pan Am Flight 103: https://brainly.com/question/4723585
#SPJ1
Where would a bill deciding the budget start?
Answer:
In the United States, the budget process begins with the President's budget proposal, which is typically submitted to Congress in early February. The proposal outlines the President's spending and revenue priorities for the upcoming fiscal year, which begins on October 1.
The budget proposal is then considered by the House and Senate Budget Committees, which are responsible for developing a budget resolution that sets overall spending levels for the federal government. The budget resolution is a non-binding document that serves as a blueprint for the appropriations process, which is the process of allocating specific amounts of money for specific programs and activities.
After the budget resolution is adopted by both the House and Senate, it is used as a guide for the appropriations committees, which are responsible for drafting and passing individual appropriations bills that fund the various agencies and programs of the federal government. The appropriations bills must be passed by both the House and Senate and signed into law by the President before the new fiscal year begins in order to avoid a government shutdown.
Explanation:
Why are these different services provided by different levels of government?
O Local government services are more efficient.
O Local government services are more expensive.
O Local government services require more training.
O Local government services affect people in a smaller area.
The reason for the different services provided by different levels of government is: D. Local government services affect people in a smaller area.
What is local government services?Local government services, such as trash collection, street maintenance, and parks and recreation facilities, typically have a more localized impact and are best handled by the local government that is closest to the community being served.
Local governments have a better understanding of the specific needs and issues facing their community, and they can tailor ther services to meet those needs more efficiently and effectively than a higiher level of government.
Therefore, different levels of government provide different services based on their jurisdiction, expertise, and the needs of the communities they serve.
Learn more about local government here:https://brainly.com/question/29547558
#SPJ1
What court cases have used the Gideon v. Wainwright ruling?
Answer:
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainwright was one of a series of Supreme Court decisions that confirmed the right of defendants in criminal proceedings, upon request, to have counsel appointed both during the trial and on appeal. In the subsequent cases of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964) and Miranda v.
When riding a bike, you should be looking where you are going, your
and image a straight line in front of you, your
Path of travel; peripheral vision
Path of travel; line of sight
Field of view; line of sight
Line of sight; field of view
When riding a bike, you should be looking where you are going, your and image a straight line in front of you, your Path of travel; peripheral vision.
What is peripheral vision?
Peripheral vision, also known as indirect vision, is sight that is seen away from the point of fixation, or, when viewed at extreme angles, in the "corner of one's eye."
Peripheral vision is the term used to describe the overwhelming majority of the visual field. Depending on the situation, there are various ways to define the inner limits of peripheral vision.
In colloquial usage, what would technically be referred to as "far peripheral vision" is frequently referred to as "peripheral vision." This is vision that is not stereoscopic in nature. A circle with a radius of 60° or a diameter of 120° can be used to represent its center.
Learn more about peripheral vision, here
https://brainly.com/question/4770363
#SPJ1
property can be lost by adverse possession
Adverse possession is a method of obtaining land without the consent of the owner by taking possession of the land in an open and hostile manner for a specified period of time. When a person adversely possesses property, the owner may lose the title to that property.
The loss of title due to adverse possession happens when a person meets certain requirements such as the possession of the property for a specified period of time and doing so in a hostile manner. Adverse possession has been an established principle in common law for a long time. A person can only claim adverse possession against the legal owner of the property.
To claim adverse possession, a person must fulfill the following requirements:
Continuous and uninterrupted possession of the property:
The person must occupy the property for a specified number of years. The length of time required varies depending on the law of the jurisdiction in which the property is located.Open and notorious possession: The person must possess the property openly and notoriously for a specified period of time. This means that the person must use the property as if they were the owner of the property, such as using the property for farming purposes, putting up fences, or using the property for other uses that an owner would use it for.
Hostile possession: The person must possess the property without the permission of the owner. In other words, the person must be using the property without the owner's consent. The person must have no relationship with the owner that would give them permission to use the property.
Exclusive possession: The person must possess the property exclusively. This means that the person must be the only person using the property and not sharing it with anyone else. If the owner has given permission to others to use the property, then the person cannot claim adverse possession. Because of the nature of adverse possession, the owner may not be aware of the adverse possession taking place.
When an owner loses title to property due to adverse possession, it is often because they were not aware that someone was using their property without their permission. Therefore, it is important for owners to monitor their property to ensure that adverse possession does not take place.
Know more about Adverse possession here:
https://brainly.com/question/32382399
#SPJ8
How long does a bill have to be approved by both houses of Congress?
1 year
5 years
10 years
3 years
Answer:
a year because it can take up to months or days
What locations are individuals prohibited from carrying a firearm? What is the punishment classification? , i need 6 locations
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ..
Regarding drinking and driving, it takes courage to ask for help, go for rehabilitation or report yourself to the authority.
What is the issue of drinking and driving about?Alcohol has an impact on the areas of your brain that manage your skill and judgment. The more alcohol you consume, the worse you get at things.
Drinking and driving may seem like a good idea when you're intoxicated, but even small amounts of alcohol can affect your reaction times and cause double or blurred vision, which puts you in danger when operating a vehicle. You run the danger of causing an accident while intoxicated, leaving you with a totaled vehicle and a large insurance claim.
Learn more about drinking and driving from
https://brainly.com/question/1173942
#SPJ1
PLS HELP
Historically, which statement is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States?
O
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation.
O
The vast majority were pocket vetoes and thus could not be overridden.
O
The vast majority were determined to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
O
The vast majority of vetoes were overridden by Congress.
The vast majority of presidential vetoes remained in force, ending that version of the legislation is true about the total number of bills vetoed in United States.
Has a president veto ever been overridden in the US?When Congress overrode five of Franklin Pierce's nine vetoes during his presidency, it would be more than a decade until it did so again. More than 2,500 measures have been vetoed by American presidents so far, and Congress has only succeeded in overcoming the veto less than 5% of the time.
Since 1789, there have been 2,584 presidential vetoes. The "normal veto" and the "pocket veto" are the two different forms of veto. Reaching the two-thirds barrier requires significant public support, which is a challenging standard to accomplish. Because Congress has only overridden 106 of the 1,484 regular vetoes since 1789, or 7.1%, the President's veto power is significant.
To learn more about presidential vetoes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1087799
#SPJ1
Did you know anything about Gerrymandering? Was any of this information surprising to you? Why or why not?
Gerrymandering is the practice of redrawing election districts to favour a certain political party. Although the magnitude and effect may not be shocking, they often are.
I am aware of gerrymandering, which is the act of influencing an election constituency's borders in order to favour one political party or organisation over another. This is done to make sure that the ruling party can continue to win most of the elections.
This did not come as a surprise to me considering that gerrymandering has long been a contentious topic in many nations, including the US. Even yet, the amount to which it is applied and the effects it has on representation and democracy may be surprising.
Learn more about Gerrymandering:
https://brainly.com/question/29553293
#SPJ1
why is the high court and the supreme court of India known as the court of the records?
Answer:
The supreme court is a court of record. ... As it is an advisory court it hears matters which are referred under constitution by President of India. The law which is declared by the supreme court becomes binding on all courts within India and also by union and state governments.
Explanation:
hope it helps
1. Why was Mr. Friedman in the movie reluctant to take the case?
Answer: The Bridgeport branch of the NAACP hired local lawyer Samuel Friedman, played in the movie by Josh Gad, even though Friedman’s initial reaction was, “I don’t think you could find a man on the street that in any way had sympathy for Spell or that believed that this was consensual, including me.”
Explanation:
Brainliest pls:)
Mr. Peters has a legal handgun to protect his home against intruders and against the increasing crime in his neighborhood. One night, Takeshi, a 16 year old Japanese exchange student, walks up Mr. Peters’ driveway looking for a party. Takeshi thinks Mr. Peters is hosting the party and begins yelling and waving his arms. Mr. Peters gets scared, retrieves his handgun, and points it at Takeshi while yelling “Freeze!” Takeshi does not understand English and keeps walking toward Mr. Peters. Thinking he is an intruder, Mr. Peters shoots and kills Takeshi at the front steps of his house. Mr. Peters is charged with first-degree muder. Does he have a defense?
Answer: In this scenario, Mr. Peters may argue that he acted in self-defense. Self-defense is a legal defense that allows an individual to use reasonable force in order to protect themselves from an imminent threat of harm. However, whether Mr. Peters's actions were reasonable under the circumstances could be debated.
A key factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters had a reasonable belief that Takeshi posed an imminent threat of harm to him. Mr. Peters may argue that he was scared and believed that Takeshi was an intruder, based on the fact that Takeshi was yelling and waving his arms. However, the fact that Takeshi did not understand English, and was not responding to Mr. Peters's commands may indicate that Mr. Peters should have realized that Takeshi was not an immediate threat.
Another important factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances. In this case, it could be argued that shooting Takeshi was not a reasonable response, as there may have been other options that Mr. Peters could have taken to protect himself, such as calling the police or using non-lethal force.
In general, whether Mr. Peters has a defense will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and how these facts are presented and evaluated in court.
Explanation:
I am doing a follow up case on the Dadeville shooting in alabama. The suspects were charged with 4 counts of reckless murder. More charges will be filed. Going based off of the 4 counts what is the recommended sentencing based on alabama state law?
.
Some general factors that would influence sentencing recommendations include:
• The specifics of the charges (e.g. reckless murder vs. 1st degree murder) and the number of charges. More/lesser charges would impact sentencing.
• Alabama sentencing guidelines which provide ranges for different types of felonies based on offense levels. Reckless murder would likely fall into a higher offense level.
• The criminal history of the offenders. Prior criminal records could increase recommended sentences.
• Circumstances of the crime. Especially aggravating factors could warrant longer sentences.
• Discretion of the judge. Sentencing ultimately comes down to the judge's discretion within the applicable laws and guidelines.
Without knowing the details of the Dadeville shooting case, charges, criminal histories of the offenders, and judge's sentencing philosophy, I cannot determine precise recommended sentences for the 4 reckless murder charges. The sentences could range from many years to potentially life imprisonment, depending on the factors.
The best approach is to review the specific laws on reckless murder sentencing in Alabama, the guidelines, details of the charges and offenders in this case, and decisions in similar previous cases to help determine an appropriate recommendation range for each charge. But there are too many unknowns based on the information provided for me to give more precise recommendations. Please let me know if you have any other questions.