The _____ is a measure of the average speed of the particles in a substance.

Answer:

116°

Step-by-step explanation:

You just add angle FUV and angle TUF together bc they make up the angle TUV

Answer:

116

I'm not gonna explain it but yeah it's 116

Answer:

\(\frac{8}{10}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(cos(A) = \frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse} \\= \frac{AB}{AC}\\= \frac{8}{10}\)

Answer:

Answer:

\frac{8}{10}

10

8

Step-by-step explanation:

\begin{gathered}cos(A) = \frac{adjacent}{hypotenuse} \\= \frac{AB}{AC}\\= \frac{8}{10}\end{gathered}

cos(A)=

hypotenuse

adjacent

=

AC

AB

=

10

8

Answer:

y + 6 = -3/4(x-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

lmk if you want an explanation

Sometimes true. Take for example the trinomial \(x^2+2x-3,\) which is a polynomial but not a binomial. On the other hand, one polynomial that satisfies the statement is the binomial \(x+2.\)

The Refernce angle is 13

Step-by-step explanation:

For example imange a coordinate plane lets say we want to draw an angle thats 144° We start on the right side of the x-axis, where three o’clock is on a clock. We rotate counterclockwise, which starts by moving up. We keep going past the 90° point (the top part of the y-axis) until we get to 144°. hope this helps!

Answer:

In 1997, the baseball card would be worth $7.46 + $2.52 = $9.98.

In 1998, the baseball card would be worth $9.98 + $2.52 = $12.50.

In 1999, the baseball card would be worth $12.50 + $2.52 = $15.02.

Step-by-step explanation:

In this problem, we are given the value of a baseball card in 1996, which is $7.46. We are also told that the value of the card increases by $2.52 each year since then. This means that in 1997, the value of the card increased by $2.52 compared to its value in 1996, so the value in 1997 would be $7.46 + $2.52 = $9.98. Similarly, in 1998, the value of the card increased by another $2.52 from its value in 1997, so the value in 1998 would be $9.98 + $2.52 = $12.50. In 1999, the value of the card increased by another $2.52 from its value in 1998, so the value in 1999 would be $12.50 + $2.52 = $15.02.

Answer:

21.99 or just round to 22

Step-by-step explanation:

Radius is 3.5

Diameter is 7

Circumference is 21.99

Answer:

1st Circle

Radius = 3.5

Diameter = 7

Circumference = 2 × \(\pi\) × r = 2 × 3.14 × 3.5 = 21.98

2nd Circle

Radius = 9

Diameter = 18

Circumference = 2 × \(\pi\) × r = 2 × 3.14 × 9 = 56.52

:DDDDDDDDD

Answer: In the picture, it should be the 1st one

Step-by-step explanation: If i am incorrect, im so very sorry.

The total area of the three triangles is square units is 36 and the area of the figure is square units is 60.

The triangle can be defined as a three-sided polygon in geometry, and it consists of three vertices and three edges. The sum of all the angles inside the triangle is 180°.

From the figure, the area of triangles can be calculated using the:

Area = (1/2)height×base length

Area of three triangle = 1/2(4×6) + 1/2(6×4) + 1/2(4×6)

Area of three triangle = 1/2(24×3) = 36 square units

Area of the figure = area of three triangle + area of the rectangle

= 36 + 6×4

= 60 square units

Thus, the total area of the three triangles is square units is 36 and the area of the figure is square units is 60.

Learn more about the triangle here:

brainly.com/question/25813512

#SPJ1

Answer:

  a) Megan's total so far is 3 km more than necessary for an average of 15 km

  b) 22 km

Step-by-step explanation:

a) The total of differences from 15 is ...

  -1 + 8 + (-2) +(-2) = 3

Since this is more than 0, Megan's average is more than 15.

__

b) The total of differences from 17 is ...

  -3 +6 -4 -4 = -5

To increase her average to 17 km, Megan must walk 17+5 = 22 km on Friday.

_____

Comment on the approach

In general, I find it easier mentally to deal with small numbers than with larger ones. So adding small differences can be easier than computing larger sums.

a) By computing the difference from the supposed average, we have effectively found the difference of the sum of values from the total necessary to give the required average. That is, Megan's average would be 15 if her total distance were 4·15 = 60. Her total distance is (4·15 +3) = 63, so her average is more than 15.

b) By finding out how much the total is below that necessary for the desired average, we determine the amount above that average the final number needs to be.

  (14 -17) +(23 -17) +(13 -17) +(13 -17) +(Friday -17) = 0 . . . . the Friday value to make an average of 17

  14 +23 +13 +13 +Friday = 5·17 . . . . . . . add 5·17

  (14 +23 +13 +13 +Friday)/5 = 17 . . . . . . shows the Friday amount gives the required average

  Friday = 17 -((14 -17) +(23 -17) +(13 -17) +(13 -17)) . . . . first equation rearranged to show how we computed Friday

  Friday = 17 -(-5) = 17 +5 = 22

Answer:

The third one

Step-by-step explanation:

mP is not correct

Answer:

13x - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

16x - 3x - 4 = 13x - 4

Answer:

The answer is

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all separate the two from the x

That's

Next we use the rules of indices

Since they have the same base and are dividing we subtract the exponents

That's

So we have

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

The volume of the container is approximately 12.9516 cubic meters when rounded to the nearest hundredth.

To find the volume of the container, we need to multiply its length, width, and height. Let's convert the given measurements to meters to ensure consistent units.

The length of the container is 2.76 meters.

The width of the container is 23.5 decimeters, which is equal to 2.35 meters (since 1 decimeter = 0.1 meters).

The height of the container is 196 centimeters, which is equal to 1.96 meters (since 1 meter = 100 centimeters).

Now we can calculate the volume of the container:

Volume = Length × Width × Height

Volume = 2.76 meters × 2.35 meters × 1.96 meters

Volume ≈ 12.9516 cubic meters (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, the volume of the container is approximately 12.9516 cubic meters when rounded to the nearest hundredth.

for such more question on volume

https://brainly.com/question/6204273

#SPJ8

Answer:

180 cm^2

Step-by-step explanation:

(8 x 15)/2 = 60 cm^2

(16 x 15)/ 2 = 120 cm^2

120 + 60 = 180 cm^2

Answer:

She use 1/12 of the paper

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: no

Step-by-step explanation: if it left then it would have to be angled at least a little bit.

The measure of the angle ABD is (3x + 29)  

Bisecting angles is the process of dividing an angle into two congruent angles. In geometry, an angle bisector is a line or ray that divides an angle into two equal parts.

When an angle is bisected, each of the two angles formed is called a half-angle or bisector angle, and the point where the angle is bisected is called the vertex of the angle.

Here we have

BD bisects ABC and ∠ABC = 6x+58  

When a straight bisect an angle then the measure of the resultant 2 angles will be equal in measure

Here BD bisected ABC

The resultant angles will be ∠ABD and ∠DBC

Hence,

=> ∠ABC = ∠ABD + ∠DBC

=> ∠ABC = ∠ABD + ∠ABD   [ Since two angles are equal

=> ∠ABC = 2∠ABD  

From the given data,

=> 6x + 58 = 2∠ABD  

=> 2 ∠ABD = 2(3x + 29)

=> ∠ABD = (3x + 29)  

Therefore,

The measure of the angle ABD is (3x + 29)  

Learn more about Bisecting angles at

https://brainly.com/question/28292775

#SPJ1

Answer: The probability of drawing a king from the deck has been changed when a Jack is drawn and not replaced back. So the two events are dependent. The answer to this question is TRUE

Step-by-step explanation:

Two events are dependent if the occurrence of one event affects the probability of occurrence of the other event.

Total number of cards in a deck are 52. There are 4 jacks and 4 kings.

If we simply pick up a king from the deck, the probability of picking a king would be

However, when a Jack is drawn from the deck of cards and not replaced back, the number of total cards reduces by 1. So now the total number of cards in the deck is 51 with 4 kings. In this case the probability of drawing a king is 4/51

Answer:

Your answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

edge = V^1/3

edge = 216^1/3

Answer:

Is 3/5 greater than 1/4? Is 3/5 bigger than 1/4? Is 3/5 larger than 1/4? These are all the same questions with one answer.

To get the answer, we first convert each fraction into decimal numbers. We do this by dividing the numerator by the denominator for each fraction as illustrated below:

3/5 = 0.6

1/4 = 0.25

Then, we compare the two decimal numbers to get the answer.

0.6 is greater than 0.25.

Therefore, 3/5 is greater than 1/4 and the answer to the question "Is 3/5 greater than 1/4?" is yes.

Which means that this equation is also true: 3/5 > 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Note: When comparing fractions such as 3/5 and 1/4, you could also convert the fractions (if necessary) so they have the same denominator and then compare which numerator is larger.

Given:

Answer:

4 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Miles to Minutes = 3:1

Miles to Minutes = 12:?

12/3=4

Miles to Minutes = 12:(1x4)

Miles to Minutes = 12:4

Miles = 12

Minutes = 4

Anna's total profit was $6000 + $16000 - $4000 = $14000.

How did Anna earn profit

Anna bought $4000 of company stock. The value of the stock doubled when she sold 75% of it, which means she sold 0.75 * $4000 = $3000 worth of stock when its value doubled.

Since the value of the stock doubled, Anna sold the $3000 worth of stock for 2 * $3000 = $6000.

Anna then sold the remainder of the stock (25% of the original amount) for four times the purchase price. Since she originally bought the stock for $4000, the remainder was worth 0.25 * $4000 = $1000.

Selling this remainder for four times the purchase price means that Anna sold it for 4 * $4000 = $16000.

A 2-pound package of hamburger costs $7.00, and you pay $10.50 for a 3-pound package of hamburger.

To find the cost per pound of hamburger, we need to divide the total cost by the weight in pounds.

For the 2-pound package

Cost per pound = Total cost / Weight in pounds

Cost per pound = $7.00 / 2 lbs

Cost per pound = $3.50 per pound

For the 3-pound package

Cost per pound = Total cost / Weight in pounds

Cost per pound = $10.50 / 3 lbs

Cost per pound = $3.50 per pound

Therefore, the cost per pound of hamburger is the same for both packages, at $3.50 per pound.

To know more about package here

https://brainly.com/question/9480361

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

Volumeof cube = s³

= 5³

=125cm³

Surface area of cube = 6•s²

= 6 x 5²

= 6 x 25

= 150cm²

v=l³

v=5³

v=125cm³#

Step-by-step explanation:

hope you like it