The video fo-otage should be allowed as an evidence as it helps in not only proving the cul-pability of the ac-cused but also inn-ocence of the vic-tim. Therefore, video fo-otage taken from body cameras must be allowed as evidence.
About Body Cameras
A body camera or portable camera, also known as a body-worn video (BWV), is an actual wearing audio, video, or picture recording equipment used by police to record incidents from the perspective of the wearing officer. They are usually covered on the body's torso and fastened to the officer's clothing. Although they are designed particularly to meet the requirements of law enforcement, police body cameras often mirror those worn by civilians, firefighters, or the Armed Forces. Police in the UK began using body cameras in 2005; ever since, several police departments across the world have adopted them.
To know more about body cameras:
brainly.com/question/21576230
#SPJ1
How does a counterclaim help support a position in an argumentative essay?
Answer:
A counterclaim helps support the writer position in an argumentative essay because The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect, as you write, think about your audience.
Answer:
The counterclaim shows how the opposing opinion is incorrect.
Explanation:
edge 2021
Motorcycles are smaller than cars. This makes them
Answer:
This can make them harder to spot and more probable to being attracted to a traffic accident.
Explanation:
Motorcycles are smaller than cars. This makes them harder to spot and more probable to being attracted to a traffic accident.
What is traffic accident?A vehicle collides with another vehicle, a pedestrian, an animal, road debris, or another moving or stationary barrier, such as a tree, pole, or structure, to cause a traffic collision, also known as a motor vehicle collision.
Traffic accidents frequently result in harm to people and property, as well as financial expenses to society and those affected.
The most hazardous condition that people encounter on a regular basis is road travel, but the number of casualties from such accidents receives less media coverage than that of other, less common sorts of disaster.
Vehicle design, speed of operation, road design, weather, the environment on the road, driving abilities, impairment from alcohol, and behavior, particularly aggressive driving, distracted driving, speeding, and street racing, all increase the likelihood of crashes.
Learn more about traffic accident, here
https://brainly.com/question/12893844
#SPJ5
what does roosevelt give here as his reasons for presenting this bill
Roosevelt presents this bill for the following reasons: economic recovery and relief for the American people.
In his address, President Roosevelt highlights the dire state of the economy and the widespread suffering caused by the Great Depression. He emphasizes the need for immediate action to stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and provide relief to those who are unemployed or facing financial hardships. Roosevelt argues that the proposed bill, through its various provisions and programs, will help revive the economy by increasing consumer purchasing power, stabilizing banks, promoting industrial recovery, and implementing social welfare measures. He emphasizes that the bill aims to restore confidence, restore faith in the banking system, and alleviate the suffering of millions of Americans affected by the economic crisis.
The primary objective is to spur economic recovery and provide relief to the American people who are bearing the brunt of the depression's impact.
To know more about President Roosevelt, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30715272
#SPJ11
WHERE IS RAMIEZ!!!!!
Answer: ever try studying its not that hard
Explanation:
Cause its easier
According to results from the Monitoring the Future survey, when did drug use among young Americans reach its highest level?
Answer:
1970s
[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]
stopping mail services and locking all windows and doors are typical items on a
Answer: very expensive store
Explanation:
what does a forum-selection clause do? multiple choice it allows the parties to choose the actual court in which they will pursue litigation. it allows the parties to specify the law that will govern their dispute. it waives the subject matter jurisdiction of certain courts. it specifies for the parties that federal court is the only venue in which to bring a lawsuit. it requires mandatory arbitration.
A forum-selection clause do it allows the parties to choose the actual court in which they will pursue litigation. Option A is the correct answer.
A forum-selection clause is a contractual provision that allows the parties involved in an agreement to select the specific court or jurisdiction where any legal disputes arising from that agreement will be resolved. It provides clarity and certainty regarding the venue for litigation, ensuring that both parties are aware of where any potential legal actions will take place.
By including a forum-selection clause in a contract, the parties can choose a preferred jurisdiction that is convenient, favorable, or more familiar to them. For example, if the parties are located in different states or countries, they may agree to select a neutral jurisdiction that is mutually acceptable to both parties.
This clause does not waive subject matter jurisdiction or specify that federal court is the only venue for a lawsuit. It is different from a choice of law clause, which allows the parties to specify the governing law that will apply to the agreement.
For such more question on court:
https://brainly.com/question/30490295
#SPJ8
what are the essential requisites of an obligation give example
An active subject, who has the power to demand the prestation, known as the creditor or oblige , A passive subject, who is bound to perform the prestation, known as debtor or obligor.
Examples of Obligations?If a person consistently misses their car payments, the automaker will seize and reclaim the vehicle.An obligation is a legal need to give, to perform, or not to do anything. Taxes are a type of duty, and failing to pay them results in steep fines or jail. 1. For an obligation to have legal force, it must be of a juridical type. Through this, the fulfilment of an obligation may be ordered by the court. An obligation can be natural or civil.
To learn more about Obligations refer:
https://brainly.ph/question/4063243
#SPJ9
You are working to design a map each area you are designing will take up to 10 hours to make how many hours will it take you to design 7 areas
Answer:
It would take 70 hours to design 7 areas
Explanation:
7 × 10
1. highlight the two distinct types of behavior that are subject to sanctions under section 2 of the sherman act.
Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, two distinct types of behavior that are subject to sanctions are monopolization and attempted monopolization.
Monopolization refers to the act of acquiring or maintaining a monopoly over a particular market or industry. It involves using anticompetitive practices such as exclusionary conduct, predatory pricing, or abusing market power to eliminate or significantly restrict competition. Attempted monopolization, on the other hand, occurs when a company engages in conduct with the intent to become a monopoly or to monopolize a specific market. This includes practices such as engaging in anticompetitive behavior or strategies to exclude or suppress competition, even if the actual monopoly is not achieved.
Both monopolization and attempted monopolization are considered antitrust violations under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. These provisions aim to promote competition, prevent the concentration of market power, and protect consumers from unfair practices that harm competition and limit consumer choice.
To learn more about Sherman Act, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17205276
#SPJ11
Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, two distinct types of behavior that are subject to sanctions are monopolization and attempted monopolization.
Monopolization refers to the act of acquiring or maintaining a monopoly over a particular market or industry. It involves using anticompetitive practices such as exclusionary conduct, predatory pricing, or abusing market power to eliminate or significantly restrict competition. Attempted monopolization, on the other hand, occurs when a company engages in conduct with the intent to become a monopoly or to monopolize a specific market. This includes practices such as engaging in anticompetitive behavior or strategies to exclude or suppress competition, even if the actual monopoly is not achieved.
Both monopolization and attempted monopolization are considered antitrust violations under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. These provisions aim to promote competition, prevent the concentration of market power, and protect consumers from unfair practices that harm competition and limit consumer choice.
To learn more about Sherman Act, click here:
brainly.com/question/17205276
#SPJ11
2. CHAPTER 6 (5 points)
Should soldiers in the military be prosecuted for the killing or torturing of enemies captured
in war? Include comments on the William Calley and Abu Ghraib cases in your response.
ANSWER:
Lt. William L. Calley was found guilty of premediated murder at My Lai by U.S. Army
Answer:
courts martial in 1971, following his involvement in the killing of hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians, including women and children, during the Vietnam War. The atrocities committed by Calley and his platoon were a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit the targeting of non-combatants in war. Similarly, the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq in 2004 brought to light the brutal and inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. military personnel. The photographs and videos that emerged from the prison showed detainees being subjected to physical and sexual abuse, torture, and humiliation. The actions of the soldiers involved in the Abu Ghraib scandal were a clear violation of international law and human rights. In both cases, the soldiers involved were prosecuted and faced punishment for their actions. The question of whether soldiers in the military should be prosecuted for killing or torturing enemies captured
People agree about how the government
should spend its money.
true or false ?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Tons of people have different opinions and thats why we have different polictical parties.
7. In a divided government, power struggles can occur because
A. one party controls the White House and the other controls Congress.
B. the Congress can override a presidential veto with a three-fourths majority.
C. the Congress creates the national budget and the president approves it.
D. the House of Representatives and the Senate are controlled by different parties.
Answer Key
All answers will be graded following this answer key:
3 marks for the answer structure (Introduction, Body, Conclusion)
3 marks for presenting the legal concept (in this case the concept of offer, acceptance, and consideration)
4 marks for justifying or defending the decision
Tahir filed a civil case in court of first instance at RAK. His dispute with Khalid is worth AED 700,000. You are a judge to the case. Give your judgment and explain the decision.
It would be desirable to get the advice of a qualified legal expert or judge who is knowledgeable with the rules and regulations relevant to the particular jurisdiction in issue for a matter involving a disagreement between Tahir and Khalid over AED 700,000 in the court of first instance at RAK. To reach a well-informed decision, they would be able to evaluate the relevant facts, arguments, evidence, and legislation. A fair and unbiased assessment of the relevant facts and legal principles is crucial since legal issues include many factors.
The legal word for the power given to a legal organization to carry out justice is jurisdiction . In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction.
In order to allocate resources to best meet the requirements of society, the executive and legislative branches of government legislation have the authority to use international law, conflict of laws, constitutional law, and other legal frameworks.
Learn more about jurisdiction , from :
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ1
explain the three of the government?
Answer: There are three portions in the U.S government. The Legislative government makes laws, The executive government carries out laws, and the Judicial branch evaluates laws.
Explanation:
What is the name of the legislature of the federal government of the united states of america?.
Answer:The answer is the united states congress
Answer:
The United States Congress
Explanation:
Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
What is the term that means putting a person under fear
Answer:
Frighten
Explanation:
..............
Which of the following statements is not correct? a Federal Appellate Courts and Federal Circuit Courts are the same thing
b For a court to hear a claim, that court must have jurisdiction c A Federal District Court is a trial court d The US Supreme Court hears every appeal that is made to it O e California has a state-level Supreme Court
The statement "a Federal Appellate Courts and Federal Circuit Courts are the same thing" is not correct. the wrong option is a.
Federal Appellate Courts and Federal Circuit Courts are distinct entities within the federal court system in the United States. Federal Appellate Courts refer to the United States Courts of Appeals, which are intermediate appellate courts that review decisions from the lower district courts.
On the other hand, Federal Circuit Courts specifically refer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of cases, including patent law and certain claims against the federal government. Therefore, they are not the same thing.
To know more about Federal Appellate Courts, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29788416#
#SPJ11
Who is the JA director of the ReaperAaron BA?
Answer:
What is JA, ReaperAaron, and BA?
Explanation:
What type of ownership interest must be disclosed in writing to all parties?
Property held directly by the licensee only
Property held directly or indirectly by the licensee or by the licensee's immediate family member only
Property held directly or indirectly by the licensee only
Property held directly or indirectly by the licensee, the licensee's immediate family member, the licensee's firm, or a member of the licensee's firm
According to the real estate law, the property held directly or indirectly by the licensee, the licensee's immediate family member, the licensee's firm, or a member of the licensee's firm must be disclosed in writing to all parties.
Real estate licensees must disclose to all parties any ownership interest held directly or indirectly by themselves or a member of their immediate family or their firm in the property. This is mandated by the law to maintain transparency and prevent fraud and misrepresentation. Thus, real estate licensees must follow these regulations while working with any client or parties involved in a real estate transaction.
To know more about Real estate visit-
brainly.com/question/31179465
#SPJ11
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
• A. Increased inflation
• B. Decreased production
• C. Economic growth
D. Per capita GDP
the answer is c Economic growth
A defendant's house was destroyed by fire, and she was charged with arson. To prove that the defendant had a motive to burn down her house, the government offered evidence that the defendant had fully insured the house and its contents. Should the court admit this evidence
The court should not admit the evidence that the defendant had fully insured the house and its contents. The reason behind this is that it is irrelevant and inadmissible, even though it might show a motive for the arson.
Here are the details of why it is so:
The admission of evidence in a trial is dependent on the Federal Rules of Evidence, which only allows proof that is relevant to the case to be admitted. Evidence is deemed irrelevant if it fails to demonstrate or disprove any element of the charged crime or if it lacks probative value, which means that it does not have the potential to assist the trier of fact in deciding the case. In the above case, the fact that the defendant had insured the house and its contents had no relevance in the proof of whether she had committed arson.
Although it might show a motive for the arson, it is not sufficient enough to be admitted as evidence since insurance coverage is a common practice by homeowners. Therefore, the court should not admit this evidence.
To know more about demonstrate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29360620
#SPJ11
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Read the following excerpt from a speech:
My fellow citizens: Young Roxanne Jones stands here
today for the many victims of industrial pollution who
cannot. She has fought a long, hard recovery after
suffering serious illness due to the inaction and
irresponsibility of companies like Trevose Inc. Because the
law allows companies like Trevose exceptions to the
currently allowed pollution levels, more children like
Roxanne will be poisoned unless we fix these loopholes.
Which is the most logical connection between Roxanne Jones and the
campaign to change the law?
OA. She is an exception to most mainstream thinking about the law.
OB. She demonstrates the complicated circumstances surrounding
the law.
O C. She is the primary reason people want to change the law.
O D. She is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.
The most logical connection between Roxanne Jones and the campaign to change the law is that she is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law. Option d is correct.
Roxanne Jones is a representative of all the victims of industrial pollution who can't stand up to fight for themselves. She has struggled to recover after falling seriously ill as a result of the carelessness and inaction of companies like Trevose Inc. Roxanne Jones is not an exception to most mainstream thinking about the law.
It is her circumstances that make the situation complicated, and she's not the primary reason people want to change the law.
The correct answer is D. She is symbolic of a class of victims hurt by the current law.
Learn more about campaign https://brainly.com/question/32161257
#SPJ11
What happened to the purge in Brazil? Has it happened to any other countries before? Will a purge ever occur in the near future?
for educational purposes.
More than a hundred humans were reported killed, with schools and companies closed and public transportation at a standstill, as six-day strike-through police withinside the Brazilian country of Espirito Santo.
What is a purge?In history, faith, and political science, a purge is a role removal or execution of folks that are taken into consideration unwanted through the ones in power from a government, some other organization, their group leaders, or society as a whole.
Yes, Purge has occurred in many parts of the world and the consequence of the event has resulted in extreme violence and killings.
Thus, The meaning and the method of observing a purge have changed over the period of time resulting in murders, killings, and destruction.
Learn more about purge here:
https://brainly.com/question/13774532
#SPJ1
the condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right of True or False
The given statement "the condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right" is True because The condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right, which is known as eminent domain.
This means that the government has the power to take private property for public use as long as the owner is compensated fairly. Eminent domain is an important power of the government, as it enables the government to carry out public projects such as the construction of highways, parks, and public buildings. The government has to provide a legitimate reason for the taking of private property, and the property owner is entitled to just compensation.
While the government has the right to use eminent domain, it must also follow strict procedures and guidelines to ensure that property owners are not taken advantage of. The government must provide notice and hearings to property owners, and must provide just compensation for the property being taken.
In conclusion, the condemnation of private property for public use is allowed under the state's right of eminent domain, but it must be done with proper procedures and just compensation for the property owner.
Know more about eminent domain here:
https://brainly.com/question/2093245
#SPJ11
What was the law that required men of certain ages to serve in the military?.
Answer:
selective service act
Explanation:
congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.
Which of the following is an ethical issue that affects the pharmaceutical industry?
making drugs portable for patients who need to travel to other healthcare professionals
finding ways to make sure patients take their drugs as advised
making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
supporting patients’ autonomy by supplying enough advertising about drugs
Answer:
The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
Explanation:
Trust me
c. In a criminal case, should a lawyer defend a client he or she knows is guilty? Would you defend someone you knew was guilty? Explain.
Answer: lawyers have a legal responsibility to their clients that they must uphold. This means if the lawyer knows the client is guilty, they must still defend them. That’s there job.
Explanation: The job of a criminal defense lawyer is to defend you against the charges that are presented, know matter what.
What is the purpose of the closing statement? (a) To summarize the financial aspects of a real estate transaction. (b) To determine the purchase price of the property. (c) To determine which party pays the brokerage commission. (d) To report income to the Internal Revenue Service.
What is the goal of the concluding remarks? ans (a) To summarize the financial aspects of a real estate transaction
What are a real estate transaction's four phases?Pre-entry into a deal is the first stage, and the actual contract signing is the second. After a contract has been signed, the third step entails ironing out the specifics of the transaction; the fourth stage is closure and the post-close period.
What procedures do you use while dealing with real estate?Preapproval is a smart move. Establish an Escrow Account. Insurance and title search. Engage legal counsel. Discuss closing costs. the home inspection must be finished. Purchase a pest inspection. Refinance the offer.
To know more about real estate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/909993
#SPJ4