The principle used by King Henry II of England to enforce the concept of a criminal law administered by a central government authority across Great Britain was called the Assize of Clarendon.
Established in 1166, the Assize of Clarendon was a series of legal reforms that aimed to improve the administration of justice and maintain public order. The Assize introduced several important innovations in the legal system, such as the establishment of juries and itinerant judges. Juries, composed of local citizens, were responsible for presenting evidence and determining guilt or innocence. Itinerant judges were appointed by the King and traveled throughout the country to hear cases, ensuring consistent application of the law.
The Assize of Clarendon greatly enhanced the power of the central government by transferring jurisdiction from local feudal lords to the King. This allowed for a more uniform and effective administration of criminal law throughout the nation. The reforms also helped maintain social stability by addressing the public's concerns about lawlessness and the inconsistent administration of justice in the feudal system.
Overall, the Assize of Clarendon was a significant step in the development of the English legal system, as it established key principles that are still in use today. By centralizing criminal law enforcement under the authority of the King, the reforms helped to create a more efficient and standardized system of justice across Great Britain.
Know more about Assize of Clarendon here:
https://brainly.com/question/10925132
#SPJ11
who created individual rights
Answer:
The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
Hope this helps :) <3
Answer:james madison
Explanation:The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land.
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
Gary works as a police officer . He has just arrived at a crime scene . He has secured it with ropes (cordoned it off) so that people do not enter thescene . What could be Gary's purpose ?
A. to ensure nobody takes photographs
B. to prevent contamination of evidence
C. to prevents media attention
D. to flaunt his authority at the scene
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Gary did that to makes sure no one messes with the evidece.
Hope it helps
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) addresses clean air and water issues.
False
True
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Their orginization deals with health and safety of the work force
a basic premise of rights-based law enforcement is that: _______________
Answer:
Under rights-based law enforcement, any act might be justified, depending on the situation.
Explanation:
The major problem in the utilitarian ethical system is that at the time we make the decision, we are unable to know what the outcome of our actions will be.
victimisation refers to a person's violation of a human rights as well as a disturbance of their what
major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by
Major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by the primary election process. In the United States, the primary elections allow registered party members and, in some cases, unaffiliated voters to participate in selecting their party's nominee for the presidential election.
This process involves a series of state-level primary elections and caucuses in which voters express their preferences for a particular candidate.
The primary election process has become the dominant method for selecting major-party presidential nominees over the years. It allows for broader participation and a more democratic approach compared to the previous system, which relied heavily on party leaders and delegates at the national conventions to choose the nominees.
Through primary elections, voters have a direct say in determining the candidate who will represent their party in the general election. Candidates campaign extensively, seeking support from voters across different states and competing to secure the majority of delegates needed to win the party's nomination.
To know more about presidential nominations refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31185431
#SPJ11
With reference to the relevant provision of law, discuss whether the death penalty is against human rights.
Answer:
The U.S. death penalty system flagrantly violates human rights law. It is often applied in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner without affording vital due process rights. Moreover, methods of execution and death row conditions have been condemned as cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment and even torture.
Explanation:
A contract is said to be executed when all parties have completed their performances. True/False.
The given assertion " A contract is said to be executed when all parties have completed their performances". is true because
A contract is an understanding between at least two gatherings that makes legitimately restricting commitments between them.
An agreement regularly contains terms that portray the commitments of each party, the freedoms as well as limitations of each party, and the results of break of the agreement.
A contract is supposed to be executed when all gatherings have finished their commitments and exhibitions under the particulars of the agreement. Right now, the agreement hosts been completely performed and all gatherings are considered to have satisfied their commitments.
Learn more about contract:
https://brainly.com/question/25789642
#SPJ4
One of the major arguments in support of sexual registration laws is
One of the major arguments in support of sexual registration laws is that it can help to protect society from sexual offenders.
This is because sexual registration laws require sex offenders to register with law enforcement agencies and provide information such as their name, address, and other personal details.In this way, it can help law enforcement officials to monitor the movements and activities of sex offenders, which can help to prevent them from committing additional offenses and protect society from their harmful behavior.
Sexual registration laws can also serve as a deterrent to potential sex offenders, as they know that if they commit a sex crime, they will be required to register as a sex offender and be subject to monitoring by law enforcement officials.
In addition, sexual registration laws can provide information to the public about the presence of sex offenders in their communities, which can help individuals to take appropriate precautions to protect themselves and their families from potential harm.
However, it is worth noting that there is some debate about the effectiveness of sexual registration laws, and concerns have been raised about the potential for stigmatization and harassment of sex offenders who have served their sentences and are trying to reintegrate into society.
To learn more about sexual, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28267842
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Which statement correctly describes a delinquent?
A.
a young person
B.
a young person who has committed a crime
C.
any person who has served a prison sentence
D.
any person who has faced a criminal trial
it criminology
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Deliquets are young kids who have commited crimes
Answer:
B.) a young person who has committed a crime
What sort of case would be held first at a state court?
Select one:
a. Video game pirating
b. Child custody argument
c. Treason
d. Bankruptcy declaration
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Treason is very illegal and betraying for a country, and should be dealt with first.
Answer:
The Correct Answer is C. Treason.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!!!
MARK ME BRAINLEAST!!!
What was the most significant governmental action in the 1960s and 1970s to radically change the EMS situation?
Answer:
Several Medical and Law experts gathered together and debated the formation of a new half government half privatized department to assist the Fire Department and Police in the field faster than the hospital could. In fact back then even experts debated to make a law that drivers must yield to emergency vehicles. However that law didnt become official until 1996 when a Paramedic was struck and killed by another vehicle
Explain the concept of "field training" for police officers. When does it begin and what is the primary purpose for the training?
Answer:
"Field Training" is usually hosted after the Police Academy. For example if you take a look at the Los Angeles Police Department the officers in training are long sleeves with neckties. They are to be at a close watch of a T.O (Training Officer) which means that the T.O is to supervise them during a 10-95 (Traffic Stop), 10-32 (Backup Required) calls and evaluating their Code-3 (Lights and Siren) response. If there are shots fired during the course of the Field Training the Trainee is to act as a full rank officer and begin assisting and protecting him/herself and the Training Officer.
legal fees for llcs and llps are usually based on number of members and complexity of the organization. t/f
The given statement "Legal fees for LLCs (Limited Liability Companies) and LLPs (Limited Liability Partnerships) are not usually based solely on the number of members and complexity of the organization." is False because While these factors can play a role in determining the fees, there are several other factors that can influence the cost.
The complexity of an LLC or LLP can vary greatly depending on various factors such as the nature of the business, the industry it operates in, the presence of multiple jurisdictions, contractual agreements, regulatory compliance requirements, and more. These complexities can impact the legal work involved and, consequently, the fees charged.
Additionally, legal fees can also be influenced by the specific legal services required. These may include formation and registration of the entity, drafting operating agreements or partnership agreements, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, intellectual property protection, contract drafting and negotiation, dispute resolution, and ongoing legal compliance.
Therefore, while the number of members and complexity of the organization can be factors, legal fees for LLCs and LLPs are determined by a combination of various factors, and it is important to consult with an attorney to obtain an accurate estimate based on your specific circumstances.
Know more about LLC here:
https://brainly.com/question/14466609
#SPJ11
this landmark u.s. supreme court case held that evidence of officer credibility as a witness may be considered exculpatory evidence and should be given to the defense during discovery.
This landmark U.S. Supreme Court case held that evidence of officer credibility as a witness may be considered exculpatory evidence and should be given to the defense during discovery.
The case is Brady v. Maryland.What is Brady v. Maryland?Brady v. Maryland is a landmark case in which the U.S. Supreme Court established that the prosecution must provide exculpatory evidence, including any evidence that may affect the credibility of a witness, to the defense during the discovery phase of a criminal case.The case was filed in 1963 and centered on John Brady, who was charged with murder along with an accomplice, Donald Boblit. Brady admitted to being present when the murder occurred, but he claimed that Boblit was the one who committed the crime.Boblit was tried first and was convicted of first-degree murder.
Learn more about supreme court here:https://brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ11
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
it is a good idea to use expert testimony in a speech when your topic
Yes, it can be a good idea to use expert testimony in a speech when your topic requires credibility and authority.
Authority refers to the legitimate power or control that an individual, organization, or governing body possesses to make decisions, enforce rules, and influence others. It is the right to exercise control, give commands, and expect obedience or compliance from others within a specific context or domain. Expert testimony can provide support for your argument or ideas and can lend credibility to your speech. When using expert testimony, it is important to choose experts who have relevant knowledge and experience in the field or topic you are discussing. Additionally, it is important to properly attribute and cite the expert testimony to maintain ethical standards and avoid plagiarism.
To learn more about authority
https://brainly.com/question/30727335
#SPJ11
In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Infant to fear a lab rat
Explanation:
The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.
Please give Brainliest :)
delroy joined with hundreds of other people in a legal action where together they sued implantco for producing a hernia mesh device that was implanted in them during surgery and later caused complications such as swelling and infections. what is the name for this legal action? multiple choice free standing litigation cross-claim alternative dispute resolution class action
The legal action that Delroy and hundreds of other people joined together for is called a class action lawsuit. The last option is correct. This type of lawsuit allows a group of people to join together to bring a single lawsuit against a defendant.
In this case, they are suing Implantco for producing a hernia mesh device that caused complications such as swelling and infections after it was implanted during surgery. The name for this legal action is class action. A class-action lawsuit is a civil lawsuit brought by a group of people who have been harmed by the same incident or product. Class actions allow numerous plaintiffs to take legal action against a defendant, and the court's ruling applies to all members of the class.Therefore, as per the statement, Delroy joined with hundreds of other people in a legal action where together they sued Implantco for producing a hernia mesh device that was implanted in them during surgery and later caused complications such as swelling and infections. The name for this legal action is a class action.Learn more about legal action: https://brainly.com/question/29423179
#SPJ11
Under the UCC Article 2, if a buyer breaches a sale of goods contract, the seller gets specific remedies.
(List 2 of these)
1. Review at least one major law enacted by the federal
government in relation to health. Asses what promoted this
legislation. How might it impact the health of older adults?
Answer:
One major law enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. The ACA was passed in 2010 with the aim of improving access to healthcare, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the quality of care for all Americans.
Several factors promoted the legislation of the ACA. One key factor was the high number of uninsured individuals in the United States, which left many people without access to necessary medical services. The rising costs of healthcare and the challenges faced by individuals with pre-existing conditions in obtaining affordable coverage were also driving forces behind the ACA.
The ACA has various provisions that directly impact the health of older adults. It provides new protections for older Americans by prohibiting insurance companies from denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on age. The law also expands Medicaid, which benefits low-income older adults who may have previously struggled to afford healthcare.
Furthermore, the ACA introduced measures to enhance preventive care for older adults, such as free screenings and vaccinations. It established the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit, allowing seniors to receive preventive services and personalized prevention plans at no additional cost. The ACA also implemented changes to Medicare's prescription drug coverage, aiming to reduce out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications.
Overall, the ACA has had a significant impact on the health of older adults by expanding access to affordable healthcare, improving preventive services, and addressing some of the financial burdens associated with aging and healthcare costs. However, it remains a complex and debated law, and its implementation and effects continue to be evaluated and discussed.
Explanation:
One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA). What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.
One major law that has been enacted by the federal government in relation to health is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in 2010. The ACA was designed to increase the availability and affordability of health insurance coverage for Americans, including older adults.
What prompted this legislation was the high rates of uninsured Americans and the rising costs of healthcare. Before the ACA, many older adults were unable to afford health insurance due to their age and pre-existing conditions, which made it difficult to access necessary medical care.
The ACA addressed this issue by prohibiting insurers from charging older adults more for coverage based on their age, and by expanding access to Medicaid for low-income individuals and families.
As a result, older adults now have greater access to preventive care and chronic disease management services, which can help improve their overall health outcomes.
Additionally, the ACA also established the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is responsible for testing new payment and service delivery models that aim to improve the quality of care for older adults while reducing healthcare costs.
Read more about ACA at https://brainly.com/question/29793469
#SPJ11
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
HURRY !!! 100 points!!
Which of the following is NOT a possible verdict following jury deliberations?
A. guilty
B. not guilty
C. delayed decision
D. hung jury
А
B
C
Answer:
the correct answer is D mate.
Explanation:
hope it helped :)
Among the following is NOT a possible verdict following jury deliberations is a hung jury. Thus the correct option is D.
What are jury deliberations?The jury enters the courtroom after receiving the directions and makes a decision on the case there before delivering its decision. Depending on all the case discussions, this might result in a guilty or not guilty verdict.
Lengthy discussions by a jury usually indicate that there is some debate regarding the alleged victim's guilt or innocence which indicates that the result may be positive.
After a detailed examination but still certain to reach a result, a jury is said to have "hung" in court. A "hung jury" is a jury that could not reach a majority verdict on guilt or innocence because there were insufficient votes in either direction.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about jury deliberations, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10208788
#SPJ2
a homeowner is very upset over a drone that a neighbor flies over his house. he takes his case to court to end this possible violation of rights. does he have a case, and on what basis?
The homeowner may have a case if the drone is flying low enough to invade their privacy or cause a nuisance. They may argue that the drone violates their reasonable expectation of privacy or interferes with the use and enjoyment of their property.
What is reasonable expectation of privacy?The concept of reasonable expectation of privacy is a fundamental principle in privacy law that refers to an individual's expectation that their personal information, activities, and conversations will not be observed or disclosed without their consent.
This expectation is considered reasonable when it is consistent with social norms and legal standards, such as privacy policies, confidentiality agreements, and laws regulating surveillance and data protection.
It applies to various contexts, including searches and seizures, surveillance by the government or private entities, monitoring of electronic communications and online activities, and access to personal data by third parties.
Whether a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy depends on various factors, such as the location, nature of the activity, and the means and purpose of the observation or disclosure. Violation of the reasonable expectation of privacy may result in legal remedies, such as damages, injunctions, and criminal charges.
Learn more about reasonable expectation of privacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30926949
#SPJ2
What is Liberal Constitutionalism?
Answer:
Constitutional liberalism is a form of government that upholds the principles of classical liberalism and the rule of law. It differs from liberal democracy in that it is not about the method of selecting government.
Explanation:
The Founders sought to limit governmental power in part by
O Providing for broad implied powers found in the preamble to the Constitution.
Listing certain powers of Congress, and only allowing them to use those powers.
Giving the power of "judicial review" to the Supreme Court.
Listing, or "enumerating," specific powers and listing certain powers denied to Congress.
Enumeration is the idea that by enumerating governmental powers, theConstitution necessarily limits them to what is expressly listed. Enumerations are fond of quoting Chief Justice Marshall’s famous dictum that “presupposes something not enumerated.”
Enumeration means counting or reciting numbers or a numbered listing. A waiter's prolonged enumeration of all available salad dressings may appear a bit antagonistic if he starts with a deep sigh. When you're reciting a listing of things, it is an enumeration. An enumeration is a whole, ordered listing of all items in a collection. The time period is commonly used in arithmetic and laptop technological know-how to list all fixed's elements.
Learn more about Enumeration Here
https://brainly.com/question/13068594
#SPJ1
Before the 23rd amendment people living in Washington DC cannot vote in national elections is that (true or false)
Answer:
False is the answer of this question
What agency(ies) and regulation(s) govern advertising of consumer products such as bottled water? What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising? What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations (students should use their own state of residence regulations) around consumer products and services? What recommendations would you offer that comply with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
The government agency that regulates advertising of consumer products such as bottled water is the FDA, The Food and Drug Administration.
What is the purpose of consumer protection as it relates to truthful advertising?
The purpose is that companies really and truthfully inform American consumers over the components of the food or medicines they are about to take. It is of the utmost importance that the American people are informed and protected when they are consuming food or medicines, so they know what they are having.
What are the consequences for non-compliance with federal and/or state regulations around consumer products and services?
FDA has the power to enforce its regulations nationwide. If companies do not comply, the FDA can enforce the regulations and companies have to pay fines from 100,000 to more than 250,000 dollars.
What recommendations would you offer that complies with regulations and could still promote the product for the company?
My recommendation is that companies are honest when making advertisements to promote their products. Many times, companies lie to attract more consumers to defeat their competitors, cheating the people on some benefits that are not true.
That is not honest or ethical.
Clear communication and honesty is my best advice.
Briefly discuss China’s separatist challenges in both Tibet and Xinjiang. How might
China’s experiences with Hong Kong and Taiwan have influenced its policies toward
these two regions?
There is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Why is Xinjiang is important for China?China's Belt and Road Initiative, a significant economic programme spanning Asia and Europe, includes Xinjiang as a key component.
Beijing wants to continue developing Xinjiang, which is home to China's greatest coal and natural gas reserves, and wants to do so by eliminating any chance of separatist action.
Ever since the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to power in 1949, Xinjiang has been a part of China. There are Uyghurs who advocate for independence from China and refer to the area as East Turkestan.
Therefore, there is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
To know more about the Xinjiang aspect of China, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7178318
#SPJ1