The sales tax rate is 5%. If Tucker buys a set of golf clubs priced at $245.00, what will be the total cost including tax?

The estimated rating of chips whose cost is $1.10 is 2.25.

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

y = 2.5x - 0.5

To estimate the rating of chips whose cost is $1.10, we can substitute x = 1.10 into the equation y = 2.5x - 0.5 and solve for y.

y = 2.5x - 0.5

y = 2.5(1.10) - 0.5

y = 2.75 - 0.5

y = 2.25

Therefore, the estimated rating of chips whose cost is $1.10 is 2.25. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, it is 2.25.

Read more about linear regression at

https://brainly.com/question/26755306

#SPJ1

Answer:

16 baseball cards

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Ryan has 48 baseball cards

If he gives 2/6 of his 48 baseball cards to Max

= 2/6 × 48

= 16

It means that Ryan gives 16 of his baseball cards to Max

｡o°✥✤✣  hope this helped you!  Can I have brainliest?✣✤✥°o｡

                            <3

Answer:

Anna - 12

Josiah - 18

Max - 16

16 + 18 + 12 = 46

48 - 46 = 2

Answer:

\(4 \sqrt{2} \)

\( \sqrt{32} = \sqrt{16 \times 2} = 4 \sqrt{2} \)

The amount of money she will have to pay for booking of the holidays would be = £220

The total amount of money that will cost Merrisa for booking of holidays = £660

The fraction of the total cost that she needs to deposit = 1/3

Therefore, the actual amount that she needs to deposit = 1/3 of £660

= 1/3× 660

= £220

Therefore, in conclusion, Merrisa would have to pay a total of £220 for booking of the holidays. This total amount is ⅓ of total cost of booking.

Learn more about division here:

https://brainly.com/question/25289437

#SPJ1

The inverse of matrix A, if it exists, is:

A^(-1) = [7/43, 2/43; 10/43, 9/43]

To find the inverse of a matrix A, we need to determine if the matrix is invertible by calculating its determinant. If the determinant is non-zero, then the matrix has an inverse.

Given the matrix A = [9, -2; -10, 7], we can calculate its determinant as follows:

det(A) = (9 * 7) - (-2 * -10)

= 63 - 20

= 43

Since the determinant is non-zero (43 ≠ 0), we can proceed to find the inverse of matrix A.

The formula to calculate the inverse of a 2x2 matrix is:

A^(-1) = (1/det(A)) * [d, -b; -c, a]

Plugging in the values from matrix A and the determinant, we have:

A^(-1) = (1/43) * [7, 2; 10, 9]

Simplifying further, we get:

A^(-1) = [7/43, 2/43; 10/43, 9/43].

For more such questions on Inverse of matrix:

https://brainly.com/question/27924478

#SPJ8

The total number of workers that were studied can be found to be 139,340,000.

The percent of workers unemployed would be 5. 4 %.

Percentage of unemployed men is 5. 6 % and unemployed women is 5. 1%.

Number of employed workers :

= 74,624,000 + 64, 716, 000

= 139,340,000

Percentage unemployed :

= ( 4, 209,000 + 3,314,000 ) / 139,340,000

= 5. 4 %

Percentage of unemployed men :

= 4,209,000 / 74,624,000

= 5.6 %

Percentage of unemployed women:

= 3,314,000 / 64, 716, 000

= 5. 1 %

Find out more on unemployment at https://brainly.com/question/13280244

#SPJ1

The full question is:

a. How many workers were studied?

b. What percent of the workers were unemployed?

c. Compare the percent unemployed for the men and the women.

Answer:

93%

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question given above, the following data were obtained:

Total number of student = 300

Number of student that can not drive = 21

Percentage of student that can drive =.?

Next, we shall determine the number of student that can drive. This can be obtained as follow:

Total number of student = 300

Number of student that can not drive = 21

Number of student that can drive =?

Number of student that can drive = (Total number of student) – (Number of student that can not drive)

Number of student that can drive = 300 – 21

Number of student that can drive = 279

Finally, we shall determine the percentage of student that can drive as illustrated below:

Total number of student = 300

Number of student that can drive = 279

Percentage of student that can drive =?

Percentage of student that can drive =

279/300 × 100

= 93%

Thus, 93% of the student can drive.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given ,

Angles of the triangle are = 90° , 45° and x

Therefore,

x will be

=> 90° + 45° + x = 180° [Since angle sum property of triangle]

=> x = 180° - 90° - 45°

=> x = 180° - 135°

=> x = 45° (Ans)

Answer:

b .3

Step-by-step explanation:

every thing else is even and if u add them up u will get to 32 eventually

Answer:

B.) 3

Step-by-step explanation:

To do this problem, we should find out what factors can equal 32. So let's start with finding out. This problem is going to require multiplication and division.

Letter A is a multiple of 32, because:

32 ÷ 2 = 16, which means that 16 x 2 = 32.

Because 2 can be divided equally into 32, this answer is wrong.

_________________

Letter C is a multiple of 32, because:

32 ÷ 4 = 8, which means that 8 x 4 = 32.

Because 4 can be divided equally into 32, this answer is also wrong.

_________________

And, because the last answer equaled 8, that means that:

32 ÷ 8 = 4, which means that 4 x 8 = 32.

Which is also wrong.

_________________

This leaves us with 32 ÷ 3 = 10.6666666667. This answer cannot be multiplied evenly into 32, so it is correct.

I hope that this helps.

The difference between the selling price and the cost price is the profit he earned.

Profit = Selling Price - Cost Price

Profit = $216 - $180

Profit = $36

To find the percentage profit, we need to calculate what proportion of the cost price the profit represents, and express that as a percentage :

Percentage Profit = (Profit : Cost Price) * 100%

Percentage Profit = ($36 : $180) * 100%

Percentage Profit = 0.2 * 100%

Percentage Profit = 20%

Therefore, his percentage profit is 20%.

With 99% confidence that the true difference lies between 0.1316 and 0.2694.

A 99% confidence interval for the difference in average SAT scores between coached and uncoached students can be constructed using the data above.

The confidence interval is calculated as (mean of coached students - mean of uncoached students) +/- (2 * standard error of the difference in means).

The mean of coached students is (0.3098 + 0.3399 + 0.219 + 0.0798) / 4 = 0.2155, and the mean of uncoached students is (0.0046 + 0.0248) / 2 = 0.0147. The standard error of the difference in means can be calculated as the square root of ((0.2155(1-0.2155)/4) + (0.0147(1-0.0147)/2)).

The confidence interval is then (0.2155 - 0.0147) +/- (2 * 0.0347) = 0.201 +/- 0.0694, or (0.1316, 0.2694). This indicates that, on average, coached students gain 0.201 points more than uncoached students, with 99% confidence that the true difference lies between 0.1316 and 0.2694.

Learn more about The confidence interval:

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ4

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

ten minus six is four, therefore x must be equal to five since five plus five is ten

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the distance between points A and B, we can use trigonometry and the given information.

Let's label the distance between A and B as "d". We know that point C is 94.4 meters away from point A. From angle A, we have the measure of 72°, and from angle C, we have the measure of 30°.

Using trigonometry, we can use the tangent function to find the value of "d".

tan(72°) = d / 94.4

To solve for "d", we can rearrange the equation:

d = tan(72°) * 94.4

Using a calculator, we can evaluate the expression:

d ≈ 4.345 * 94.4

d ≈ 408.932

Therefore, the distance between points A and B is approximately 408.932 meters.

Answer:

I think the answer is six i just searched it  or it could be 12

Step-by-step explanation:

The greatest common factor (GCF) of 48 and 6 is 6, so:

48 - 6 = 42.

this isn't college level *laugh*

The Solution.

The given parabola is

Let the vertex of the given parabola be (h,k).

So,

Substituting these values, we get

Now, substituting -2 for x in the given parabola, we get

So, the vertex of the given parabola is (-2,-1)

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

Answer:

A.) 3.096 ; b.) 4 ; C). We reject the Null

D.) There is significant evidence to support the claim that conflict resolution program reduces level of aggression in STUDENTS.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a paired test:

Given the data:

Before (x) __ After (y) __ difference (x - y)

10 ______ 8 ______ 2

3 _______ 3 ______ 0

4 _______ 1 _______3

8 _______ 5 ______ 3

8 _______ 7 ______ 1

H0 : μx = μy

H1: μx > μy

dbar = Σd / n ; n = sample size

dbar = 9 / 5 = 1.8

From calculator :

Standard deviation of d, Sd = 1.30

Test statistic = dbar ÷ (Sd / √n)

Test statistic = 1.8 ÷0.5813776

Test statistic = 3.096

Pvalue from test statistic :

df = n - 1 = 5 - 1 = 4

Pvalue, 0.05, 4 = 0.018

Since Pvalue < α ; We reject the Null

We conclude that, there is significant evidence to support the claim that conflict resolution program reduces level of aggression in students.

The time Jack left Santa Clara is 1 : 55 pm

A word problem in math is a math question written as one sentence or more. These statements are interpreted into mathematical equation or expression.

The time for Jack to walk to lose Altos is 25 min and he uses another 25mins to work to Palo alto.

Therefore, the total time he spent is

25mins + 25 mins = 50 mins

He arrived Palo at 2 :45 pm, therefore the time he left Santa Clare will be ;

2:45 pm = 14 :45

= 14:45 - 50mins

= 13:55

= 1 : 55pm

Therefore he left at 1:55 pm

learn more about word problem from

https://brainly.com/question/21405634

#SPJ1

The reasoning presented lacks explicit explanations and logical connections between the steps, making it difficult to fully understand the intended proof strategy.

The given proof aims to show that the Separation Axioms can be derived from the Replacement Schema using a particular construction involving a formula p(x, y). Let's analyze the proof step by step:

Define the formula p(x, y) as x = yo(x).

This formula states that for each x, y pair, x is equal to the unique object y such that y is obtained by applying the operation o to x.

Define the set F as {(x, x) (x)}.

This set F contains pairs (x, x) where x is the unique object obtained by applying the operation (x) to x.

Claim: F(X) = {y (x = X)p(x, y)} = {y: (x = X)x = y^o(x)} = {x: (3x € X)o(x)} = {x X: (x)}.

This claim asserts that F(X) is equivalent to {y (x = X)p(x, y)}, which is further equivalent to {y: (x = X)x = y^o(x)}, and so on.

The proof states that since (x, y) satisfies the functional formula VaVyVz(p(x, y)^(x, z) y = z), it follows that (x, y) is a functional formula.This step emphasizes that the formula p(x, y) satisfies certain properties that make it a functional formula, which is relevant for the subsequent deductions.

Finally, the proof concludes that the Separation Axioms follow from the Replacement Schema, based on the previous steps.

For more such questions on explicit

https://brainly.com/question/30394385

#SPJ8

Answer:

(8,-43)

(4,-22)

Step-by-step explanation:

In order for the ordered pair to be a solution of the inequality, you must be able to plug in the y-value of the ordered pair and it must be less than or equal to 0.

For example:

(4,-22)

x=4 ; y=-22

Plug y into the inequality

y≤0

-22≤0

Since the statement is true, I know that (4,-22) must be a solution to the inequality.

Another way to solve this problem is by graphing. If an ordered pair is in the shaded region, it is a solution to the inequality. Attached is a graph of both the inequality and ordered pairs plotted.

If this answer helped you, please leave a thanks or a Brainliest!!!

Have a GREAT day!!!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine whether each ordered pair is a solution to the inequality y ≤ 0, we need to check if the y-coordinate of each pair is less than or equal to zero.

Let's check each ordered pair:

(8, -43):

The y-coordinate is -43. Since -43 is less than zero, this ordered pair is a solution to the inequality y ≤ 0.

(4, -22):

The y-coordinate is -22. Since -22 is less than zero, this ordered pair is a solution to the inequality y ≤ 0.

(-3, 25):

The y-coordinate is 25. Since 25 is greater than zero, this ordered pair is not a solution to the inequality y ≤ 0.

(-7, 45):

The y-coordinate is 45. Since 45 is greater than zero, this ordered pair is not a solution to the inequality y ≤ 0.

So, the solutions to the inequality y ≤ 0 are:

(8, -43) and (4, -22).

Answer:

The point at f(-3) is at (-3,1).

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the y-value of a function at a specific point by using the graph, keep in mind that the x-axis is the axis that lies horizontally on the graph.

So, look along the horizontal line through the center until you find where x = -3. Now find the corresponding y-value to that x-value by looking above or below that point until you find where it intersects the graph. When you find that point, look to see what number the point corresponds with on the y-axis. In this case, it corresponds to y = 1.

Remember that ordered pairs are formatted as (x,y).

Hope this helps.

Answer:

2.72

Step-by-step explanation:

you divide 8.16 by 3

to double check you multiply 3 by 2.72

Answer:

t=-2.72

Step-by-step explanation:

3t=-8.16

3   =    3

t=-2.72

10 is the total lemon pieces of candy he picked.

Probability is defined as the likelihood or chance that an event will occur. Given the following parameters

Experimental probability of picking lemon = 2/5

Amount of candy Joe picked = 25 pieces

The probability of selecting candy = 1 - 2/5

The probability of selecting candy = 3/5

Total lemon candy selected = 2/5 * 25

Total lemon candy selected = 2 * 5

Total lemon candy selected  = 10

Hence the number of lemon pieces of candy he picked is 10

Learn more on probability here: https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The orthogonal projection of vector v onto vector w in R^3 is (-54/14, -159/70, -159/35).

To find the orthogonal projection of v onto w, we need to calculate the scalar projection of v onto w and multiply it by the unit vector of w. The scalar projection of v onto w is given by the formula:

proj_w(v) = (v⋅w) / (w⋅w) * w

where ⋅ denotes the dot product.

Calculating the dot product of v and w:

v⋅w = (-7)(-5) + (6)(-3) + (-6)(-6) = 35 + (-18) + 36 = 53

Calculating the dot product of w with itself:

w⋅w = (-5)(-5) + (-3)(-3) + (-6)(-6) = 25 + 9 + 36 = 70

Now, substituting these values into the formula, we have:

proj_w(v) = (53/70) * (-5,-3,-6) = (-54/14, -159/70, -159/35)

Therefore, the orthogonal projection of v onto w is (-54/14, -159/70, -159/35).

In simpler terms, the orthogonal projection of v onto w can be thought of as the vector that represents the shadow of v when it is cast onto the line defined by w. It is calculated by finding the component of v that aligns with w and multiplying it by the direction of w. The resulting vector (-54/14, -159/70, -159/35) lies on the line defined by w and represents the closest point to v along that line.

for such more questions on vector

https://brainly.com/question/15519257

#SPJ8

Nate current age = 22 years

Karina current age = 13 years

let

x = the years ago

The answer is 10 years ago.

Answer:

  B = (-11, -17)

  C = (11, -17)

Step-by-step explanation:

Reflection over the x-axis is accomplished by changing the sign of the y-coordinate:

  (x, y) ⇒ (x, -y) . . . . . reflection over x-axis

Reflection over the y-axis is accomplished by changing the sign of the x-coordinate:

  (x, y) ⇒ (-x, y) . . . . . reflection over the y-axis

__

  B = (-11, -17)

  C = (11, -17)

__

Check

Reflection over both axes negates both coordinates. It is equivalent to reflection over the origin, or rotation 180°.

  A(-11, 17) ⇒ C(11, -17) . . . . . both coordinates change sign

However, I can still give you some general steps to solve a math problem in 200 words.

Step 1: Read the problem thoroughly and understand what it's asking you to find. This may involve identifying the given information and what you need to find. Also, identify any constraints on the problem, like time or cost.

Step 2: Plan how to solve the problem. Think about what mathematical operations or formulas you can use to find the answer. Make a list of the steps you need to take to solve the problem. Also, determine the units for your answer.

Step 3: Solve the problem. Use the mathematical operations or formulas you've identified in step 2 to find the answer. Show all of your work, including any calculations, so that you can easily check your work later.

Step 4: Check your answer. Make sure that your answer makes sense and that it satisfies any constraints given in the problem. Also, check that your units are correct. If your answer doesn't make sense, go back and review your work to see if you made an error.

Step 5: Reflect on what you've learned. Think about what you did well and what you could improve upon in future problem-solving situations. This will help you become a more effective problem solver in the future.

For such more question on constraints

https://brainly.com/question/29989358

#SPJ8

Answer:

60mph

Step-by-step explanation:

330 divided by 5.5 is 60