Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of x?


Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of x?


48


66


24


33

Item at position 2
2
1 point

Item at position 2
Based on your value of x in question #1, what is the value for \angle EHF∠EHF



Based on your value of x in question #1, what is the value for \angle EHF∠EHF



132 degrees


96 degrees


180 degrees


90 degrees

Item at position 3
3
1 point
Item at position 3
Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of x?


Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of x?


90


20


12


5/2

Item at position 4
4
1 point

Item at position 4
Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of \angle ZXY∠ZXY?


Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of \angle ZXY∠ZXY?


29 degrees


55 degrees


90 degrees


20 degrees

Item at position 5
5
1 point

Item at position 5
Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of x ?


Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of x ?


42


18


26


5

Item at position 6
6
1 point

Item at position 6
Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of \angle JML∠JML?


Think carefully about the angle relationship the following represents.







What is the value of \angle JML∠JML?


180 degrees


90 degrees


100 degrees


126 degrees

Answer:

20%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given/To Find:

A $52.50 screen door is on

sale for $42. Find the percent

of discount on the door.

Solve:

Formula: Value 1 - Value 2 ÷ Original Value × 100

Hence we have:

52.50 - 42 = 10.5

10.5 ÷ 52.50 = 0.20

0.20 × 100

=20%

Check Answer:

52.50 × 20% = 10.5

52.50 - 10.5 = 42

Hence, the percent of discount on the door is 20%

Kavinsky

Answer:

379-68=p

Step-by-step explanation:

379 is the total number of tissues. If you take away the single pack tissues then you will have the amount of three pack tissues

The correct equation that shows the number of tissue three-packs, p, Johnson's sold in January is, p = 379 - 68.

Use the concept of subtraction defined as:

Subtraction in mathematics means that is taking something away from a group or number of objects. When you subtract, what is left in the group becomes less.

Given that,

At Johnson's Pharmacy, tissue boxes can be purchased as single boxes or in packs of three boxes.

Here, During January, Johnson's sells a total of 379 boxes of tissues, 68 as single boxes, and the rest in three-packs.

Let us assume that, the number of tissue three-packs = p

Hence we get;

p = 379 - 68

p = 311

To learn more about subtraction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17301989

#SPJ7

Answer:

The. second one i think because proportion is amount to somthing elese

Answer : B

First year : 25750 x 80% = 20600
Second year : 20600 x 80% = 16480
Third year : 16480 x 80% = 13184
Fourth year : 13184 x 80% = 10547.2
Fifth year : 10547.2 x 80% = 8437.76

Answer:

Thank you ☺️

Answer:

The maximum  volume is 35316.4 in^3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Length + width + height is less than equal to 62 inches

Height = width = W

Let the length is L .

\(L + W + W = 62 \\\\L= 62 - 2 W\\\\Volume, V = L W H\\\\V = (62 - 2 W)\times W \times W\\\\V = 62 W^2 - 2 W^3\\\\\frac{dV}{dW}=124 W - 6 W^2\\\\So, \frac{dV}{dW} =0\\\\124 = 6 W\\\\W = 20.67 inches\)

So, the maximum volume is

\(V =124\times 20.67\times 20.67 - 2 \times 20.67^3\\\\V =52978.86 - 17662.46 = 35316.4 inch^3\)

The optimal solution for the given linear programming model is:

max z = 38

when x1 = 5, x2 = 10, x3 = 0

To solve the given linear programming model using the simplex algorithm, we start by converting the inequalities into equations and introducing slack variables. The initial tableau is constructed with the coefficients of the decision variables and the right-hand side constants.

Next, we apply the simplex algorithm to iteratively improve the solution. By performing pivot operations, we move towards the optimal solution. In each iteration, we select the pivot column based on the most negative coefficient in the objective row and the pivot row based on the minimum ratio test.

After several iterations, we reach the optimal tableau, where all the coefficients in the objective row are non-negative. The optimal solution is obtained by reading the values of the decision variables from the tableau.

In this case, the optimal solution is z = 38 when x1 = 5, x2 = 10, and x3 = 0. This means that to maximize the objective function, the decision variables x1 and x2 should be set to 5 and 10 respectively, while x3 is set to 0.

Learn more about optimal solution

brainly.com/question/30575901

#SPJ11

The value of x = 16, y = 172 and z = 2.

x - 4z = 12x - y - 6z = 42x + 3y - 2z = 8

let x - 4z = 8 be equation (1), 12x - y - 6z = 8 be equation (2) and 42x + 3y - 2z = 8 be equation (3)

x - 4z = 8

x = 8 + 4z

12x - y - 6z = 8

12(8 + 4z) -y - 6z =8

96 + 48z - y - 6z = 8

42z - y = -88

y = 42z + 88

42x + 3y - 2z = 8

42(8+4z) + 3(42z + 88) - 2z = 8

336 + 168z + 126z + 264 - 2z = 8

168z + 126z + 2z = 336+264 - 8

296z= 592

z = 2

substituting the value of z

x = 8 + 4z

= 8 + 4(2)

8+8 = 16

y = 42z + 88

42(2) + 88

84 + 88= 172

The value of x = 16, y = 172 and z = 2.

To learn more about algebraic equation refer here

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ9

The probability that the driver has no accidents in the next 365 days, but then has at least one accident in the 365-day period that follows this initial 365-day period, is approximately 0.204.

Let X be the time until the next accident for the driver. We know that X is exponentially distributed with a mean of 200 days, which means that its probability density function (PDF) is:

\($f(x) = \frac{1}{200} e^{-\frac{x}{200}} \text{ for } x > 0$\)

We want to calculate the probability that the driver has no accidents in the next 365 days (i.e., from day 0 to day 365), but then has at least one accident in the 365-day period that follows (i.e., from day 366 to day 730). We can express this probability as:

P(no accidents in first 365 days) * P(at least one accident in next 365 days | no accidents in first 365 days)

The probability of having no accidents in the first 365 days is simply the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of X evaluated at x = 365:

\($F(365) = \int_{0}^{365} f(x) dx = 1 - e^{-\frac{365}{200}} \approx 0.451$\)

The probability of having at least one accident in the next 365 days, given that there were no accidents in the first 365 days, can be calculated using the memoryless property of the exponential distribution:

P(at least one accident in next 365 days | no accidents in first 365 days) = P(X < 365) = F(365) ≈ 0.451

Therefore, the probability we are interested in is:

P(no accidents in first 365 days) * P(at least one accident in next 365 days | no accidents in first 365 days)

= 0.451 * 0.451 ≈ 0.204

To learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Answer:

301,250,000

I'm pretty sure that's it.

Answer:

8p

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply 8 and p.

Answer:

15+0.25(40)=25 dollars total

0.25(40)=10 dollars just for the 40 phone calls

___calls__________money_________

        40             =           10

         50            =            12.5

         60            =            15

          70           =             17.5

Step-by-step explanation:

25 cents times 40 phone calls would be 10 dollars then you have to add the standard 15 dollars per month for the plan to get your total cost per month if you were to make 40 phone calls.

Determine the expected count for each outcome, we multiply the probability of each outcome by the total count. In this case, with n = 749 and the given probabilities, we can calculate the expected count for each outcome.

The expected count for each outcome can be calculated by multiplying the probability of each outcome by the total count, which is n = 749 in this case.

For outcome 1, the expected count is calculated as 0.12 * 749 = 89.88.

For outcome 2, the expected count is calculated as 0.39 * 749 = 291.11.

For outcome 3, the expected count is calculated as 0.24 * 749 = 179.76.

For outcome 4, the expected count is calculated as 0.25 * 749 = 187.25.

Therefore, the expected count for each outcome is approximately 89.88 for outcome 1, 291.11 for outcome 2, 179.76 for outcome 3, and 187.25 for outcome 4. These values represent the average number of occurrences we would expect for each outcome based on the given probabilities and the total count of 749.

Learn more about average number here:

https://brainly.com/question/31087305

#SPJ11

We will repeat the exact same procedure. Something may have gone wrong.                                                                                                    

The special theory of relativity by German-born scientist Albert Einstein contains the equation \(E=mc^{2}\), which conveys the idea that mass and energy are one and the same physical substance and may be transformed into one another. The kinetic energy (E) of a body is equal to its increased relativistic mass (m) multiplied by the square root of the speed of light.

Because the mass and the speed of light are both constants, we are unable to test a new variable. Since our findings don't match the accepted formula, we cannot share them.

The result obtained is wrong we cannot apply it to another experiment. The only way we can find the correct result is by repeating the experiment. Because something may have gone wrong on the first attempt.

Therefore, the correct answer is

d) Repeat the exact same procedure.  

Read more on Mass energy equivalence:

https://brainly.com/question/32128556

#SPJ4

The correct question is: Suppose you conduct one experiment and find that the \(E=mc^{3}\), rather than the historically accepted formula, \(E=mc^{2}\). What should you do next?

a.Test a new variable

b.Share your findings

c.Apply your results to a new experiment

d.Repeat the exact same procedure                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

Answer:

The true statements are B, D, A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The reflexive property of equality states that any number is equal to itself. This property has no proof, as it is the fundamental building-block of all other proofs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 3/8

Step-by-step explanation: You have a 1 in 5 chance of pulling an orange.

5/25, or if you need to simplify then 1/5

Answer:

98

Step-by-step explanation:

B456789X+235575336

The correct answer is: B. No, there is no linear association since r is positive and is less than the critical value.

In the given answer choices, it states that r (the correlation coefficient) is positive. A positive correlation indicates a tendency for the variables to move in the same direction. However, the question asks whether a linear relation exists between the commute time and well-being index score, not the direction of the association.

Furthermore, the answer suggests that the correlation coefficient is less than the critical value. The critical value is a threshold used to determine the statistical significance of the correlation. If the correlation coefficient is less than the critical value, it indicates that the correlation is not statistically significant.

Therefore, based on the information given, we cannot conclude that there is a linear relation between the commute time and well-being index score.

Learn more about correlation coefficient here:

https://brainly.com/question/29978658

#SPJ11

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

m=y2-y1

____

x2-x1

m=-3-(-3) =(-3+3)/(-36) =0/-36=0

_____

-16-20

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

You can see that when x goes up by 1, y goes down by 2. This means the rate of change is -2

Answer:

The rate of change is -2

Step-by-step explanation:

Take any two points from the graph. (0,-4) and (-2,0). Plug them into the equation y2-y1/x2-x1. In this case the equation would be 0--4/-2-0. Simplify this and get 0+4/-2-0. Simplify again and get 4/-2 which is -2

Therefore the rate of change is -2

Hope this helps

Responda:

GRÁFICO DE TEMPO DE VELOCIDADE

Explicação passo a passo:

Para a pergunta, encontre o gráfico de velocidade-tempo no anexo.

O gráfico que melhor representa a velocidade desse avião em função do tempo é o gráfico velocidade-tempo. O gráfico de velocidade e tempo é um gráfico que representa o movimento de um objeto esquematicamente usando linhas. Ele é plotado em um plano de coordenadas com o eixo xe o eixo y.

A função de velocidade é posicionada no eixo y, enquanto o tempo gasto ao longo da viagem está no eixo x.

Pelo anexo, pode-se ver que o avião acelera em OA, possui velocidade constante em AB e CD e tem aceleração (desaceleração) negativa em BC e DE.

Answer:

x = 73

General Formulas and Concepts:

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define equation

(180 - x) + (90 - x) = 124

Step 2: Solve for x

Step 3: Check

Plug in x to verify it's a solution.

Answer:

y=-2x-13

Step-by-step explanation:

y=mx+b

3=-2(-8)+b

3=16+b

3-16=b

-13=b

Answer:

Wegman's, roughly 3 cents

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide the price by the number of paper towels in the pack to get the unit price.

$15.72/12= $1.31

$13.35/10= $1.335, round since it's money, $1.34

$1.34-$1.31= $0.03 or 3 cents

Wegmans has the better buy, as their unit price is lower.

The difference in unit prices between the two stores is $0.03 per paper towel.

To determine which store has the better buy, we need to compare the unit prices of paper towels at both Wegmans and Tops.

The unit price is the cost per paper towel.

For Wegmans:

Cost of 12 pack of paper towels = $15.72

Number of paper towels in the pack = 12

Unit price at Wegmans = Total cost / Number of paper towels

Unit price at Wegmans = $15.72 / 12 = $1.31 per paper towel

For Tops:

Cost of 10 pack of paper towels = $13.35

Number of paper towels in the pack = 10

Unit price at Tops = Total cost / Number of paper towels

Unit price at Tops = $13.35 / 10 = $1.34 per paper towel

Now, we compare the unit prices:

At Wegmans, the unit price is $1.31 per paper towel.

At Tops, the unit price is $1.34 per paper towel.

The store with the lower unit price has the better buy.

In this case, Wegmans has the better buy, as their unit price is lower.

To find the difference in unit prices:

Difference in unit prices = Unit price at Tops - Unit price at Wegmans

Difference in unit prices = $1.34 - $1.31 = $0.03 per paper towel

So, the difference in unit prices between the two stores is $0.03 per paper towel.

To learn more on division click:

brainly.com/question/21416852

#SPJ6

Answer: a

Step-by-step explanation:

Tell me if it is correct

It would take Jimbo 24 minutes to solve a 3-variable substitution problem alone.

Let's assume that Jimbo takes x minutes to solve a 3-variable substitution problem alone.

We know that Jimmy takes 8 minutes to solve the same problem alone, so his work rate is 1/8 of the problem solved per minute.

Together, Jimbo and Jim Bob can solve the same problem in 6 minutes. This means that their combined work rate is 1/6 of the problem solved per minute.

We can set up the following equation to represent the work rates:

1/8 + 1/x = 1/6

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides of the equation by 24x:

3x + 24 = 4x

x = 24

Therefore, it would take Jimbo 24 minutes to solve a 3-variable substitution problem alone.

For more such questions on substitution problem

https://brainly.com/question/11819471

#SPJ4

Answer:

A)5x+4.-54

C)5x -58

B)15x+4.-9

Step-by-step explanation: