Answer:
\(13153 \div 2 = 212\)
it's false
identify and describe which type of privacy is governed by the
privacy act 1988 cth
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) governs the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by Australian government agencies and some private sector organizations. It aims to protect the privacy of individuals by setting out specific rules and obligations that entities must follow when handling personal information.
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) primarily governs the protection of personal privacy. Personal privacy refers to the right of individuals to control and protect their personal information. It includes aspects such as the collection, storage, use, and disclosure of personal information.
Under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), individuals have the right to know why their personal information is being collected, how it will be used, and to whom it may be disclosed. They also have the right to access and correct their personal information held by organizations. Additionally, organizations must take reasonable steps to ensure the security of personal information and protect it from unauthorized access, loss, or misuse.
In summary, the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) governs the protection of personal privacy by regulating the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by Australian government agencies and some private sector organizations. It ensures that individuals have control over their personal information and that organizations handle it in a secure and responsible manner.
To know more about privacy
https://brainly.com/question/29388507
#SPJ11
the government is always the plaintiff in ________ law.
The government is always the plaintiff in Criminal law.
The government represents itself as the plaintiff or prosecuting party in legal proceedings under criminal law. In criminal proceedings, the government's role is to advocate for societal interests and seek redress for laws that have been broken. The government accuses those who are accused of crimes typically through the use of prosecutors.
This entails assembling data, making cases and arguing in favor of the application of criminal laws. The onus is on the government to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Criminal law exists to uphold social order, safeguard public safety and hold people accountable for their deeds. The government upholds the idea that crimes are offenses against society as a whole by taking on the plaintiff's role.
Learn more about criminal law at:
brainly.com/question/32272183
#SPJ4
Topic: Should gun control be tightened?
1. Does the historical evidence support the conclusion that the second amendment phone to the right of individuals to possess firearms?
Answer: Gun control should be be tightened depending on the individual, area, and motives.
Explanation: The 2nd amendment proclaims the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment shall not be infringed.
Question #2
Multiple Choice
How many local, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies are in operation in the United States?
O 650,000
O 65,000
may
O 650
O 16,500
In a case properly brought in federal district court, the plaintiff alleges that the state police, acting under a longstanding custom of using excessive force in traffic stops, beat him up during a routine traffic stop. The plaintiff requests $100,000 in damages to remedy this injury and, fearing that the state police are targeting him, also requests preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the police from using excessive force against him. The court issues an order refusing to grant the plaintiff a preliminary injunction and setting the case for trial. Three weeks later, the plaintiff appeals this order to the appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals. Can the appellate court hear this appeal
For the case brought in the federal district. The plaintiff appeals given order to the appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals. In that case, Yes, the appellate court hear this appeal as a matter of right.
What does the US Courts of Appeals do?The United States Courts of Appeal do not look into the facts of a case; instead, they consider appeals from lower courts in both civil and criminal proceedings. Instead, the Appeals Courts look at whether the lower courts implemented the law fairly and correctly.
Some characteristics of U.S. Courts of Appeals are-
The appellate courts don't hold new trials or consider fresh evidence. They are not exposed to witness testimony. No jury is present. To ensure that the proceedings were fair and the appropriate law was applied correctly, appellate courts examine the processes and rulings made by the trial court.Therefore, in this case; even though most non-final (interlocutory) orders are not appealable, those involving injunctions are automatically appealable straight away.
To know more about federal government, here
https://brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ4
A city government wants to track down people who run small business and do not pay the city’s $125 business licenses fee. The city hired a private detective to obtain IRS tax records of city residents and determine who has reported small business income to the IRS but not paid for a license.
a) What arguments might the city government give in support for this action? What argument might privacy advocates give against it?
One of the arguments that the city government could give in support of the action or levy and collecting taxes is that small business owner are beneficiaries of public infrastructure that are installed and maintained using public funds. Hence, it is only just and equitable for them to contribute to the repair and maintenance of such facilities.
The argument that privacy advocates may give against such taxes is that they already pay Company Income Tax to the IRS. Hence this is a duplication of tax.
What is the IRS?The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the revenue service for the federal government of the United States, responsible for collecting federal taxes and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, the major body of federal statutory tax legislation.
The Internal Revenue Service is the nation's tax-collecting agency, and it is responsible for enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, which was adopted by Congress.
Learn more about taxes:
https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
If an attorney objects to a question asked by the opposing attorney and the judge
agrees with the objection, the judge will:
Answer:
When a lawyer says "objection" during court, he is telling the judge that he thinks his opponent violated a rule of procedure. The judge's ruling determines what the jury is allowed to consider when deciding the verdict of a case.
Explanation:
If the judge sustains said objection, the opposing attorney in question must rephrase it or otherwise address the issue with properly admitted evidence and move on, the witness being questioned would also be prohibited from answering said inappropriate question.
- I wish not to be named, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law, PhD, Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.
Okay someone, please help if there is a speed limit sign in a school zone that says "15mph 8am-4pm" if it is summer and school isn't in session, do I still go 15? I know this is probably a silly question, but I always get a different answer when I ask..
Answer:
what is the meaning of question
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
Several persons together stole a painting from an art museum. One of them, who was the driver, was caught during the commission of another crime. He told police that "I didn't even get any money from the art museum. It all went to the first guy and the second guy." When the first and second guy go on trial for the theft of the art painting, is the driver's statement admissible in court?
Answer:
If the driver's statement was voluntarily obtained by the police without duress, then the statement will be admissible. But, if otherwise, it cannot be admitted. Such self-incriminating statements are usually used as evidence for police to arrest a suspect, but to convict. This is why at the point of arrest, the suspect is read his or her "rights to remain silent."
Explanation:
It is the responsibility of the trial judge to determine any issues as to the statement's voluntariness. This implies that the confession can be admitted into evidence if the judge determines that the confession was voluntarily made by the driver. The judge will not admit the statement if it is determined that there were some use of threats of force, violence, or intimidation on the part of the police to obtain the self-incriminating confession.
Which case would the federal courts be permitted to hear under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction
The federal courts can be permitted to hear "civil case" under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction.
What do you mean by civil case?A civil case is heard by a U.S. magistrate, a civil case involves a noncriminal matter, a civil case involves a jury and it is a tax-related matter.
A dispute between two individuals from two different states is an example of diversity jurisdiction. It is a method federal courts use to gain jurisdiction over a case involving individuals or entities from two different states.
Learn more about civil case, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11154610
#SPJ1
Franco has the permission of George to walk across his yard on the way to school. If Franco brings twenty of his friends across the yard, and they stop to play ball:
a. Franco is not guilty of trespass to real property, because he had George's permission to cross the yard.
b. Franco's friends are not guilty of trespass to real property, because they were with Franco.
c. Franco is guilty of trespass to real property, because he walked across the yard.
d. Franco and his friends are guilty of trespass to real property, because they played ball in George's yard.
A towns zoning code requires most signs on private property to be smaller than four square feet. However the code does not limit
Answer:
What is the difference between zoning and building codes?
In a nutshell, zoning requirements determine how you can use the land and what type of structures can be built (i.e. residential, commercial, etc.), while building requirements (or codes) are a set of standards that all structures must meet to ensure safety.
Explanation:
The states still retain much power and authority, but there are 5 things that the state are expressly forbidden to do. Which of the following are amping those things
Answer:
you'll go to jail
Explanation:
what is the status of affirmative action in college admissions after the supreme court decisions in the two michigan cases, one involving the university of michigan undergraduate program and one the law school?
Affirmative action policies are generally acceptable, but they cannot include racial quotas or numerical point systems. This is the current position of affirmative action in college admissions following the supreme court decisions.
Following the supreme court rulings in the two Michigan cases—one involving the undergraduate program at the University of Michigan and the other the law school is for federal contractors and subcontractors—covered employers are required to take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified minorities, women, people with disabilities, and covered veterans. Training initiatives, outreach campaigns, and other constructive measures are examples of affirmative action.
Employers must provide documentation of their affirmative action policies and metrics if they work with the government or receive any other federal monies. Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, affirmative action is another remedy available when a judge determines that an employer engaged in discriminatory practices on purpose. Affirmative action's goal is to build a workforce that accurately reflects the demographics of the competent workforce that is available in the relevant labor market. It does this through establishing fair access to employment opportunities.
To learn more about University of Michigan, refer: brainly.com/question/27736197
#SPJ4
A low risk environment is a condition when
Lightly-traveled, two-lane roads in the city or in rural or suburban areas are generally considered to be Low-Risk Environments. In these areas, the speed limit is usually restricted to 35 mph or less and there are fewer right-of-way conflicts.
Hope this helps :P
Brainliest? ^///^
What are the steps undertaken by the Philippines government to address the problem on climate change?
we can prevent the climate change by applying the 5r.
Answer:
In a nutshell: Ensure adequate processes, financing and other resources to take five main steps: emissions reduction, resilience planning, addressing loss and damage, knowledge-sharing in alternative agricultural techniques, promoting gender equality and human rights across all activities
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Of the following, turnout among young voters is likely to be highest among
black educated females
low-income male college students
young white, non-Hispanic males
non-college factory workers
Answer:
Black educated females
One example of ________ is the fact that a lawsuit filed by Washington against Nevada over river pollution goes directly before the Supreme Court. Group of answer choices granting a writ of certiorari original jurisdiction stare decisis appellate jurisdiction
One example of original jurisdiction is the fact that a lawsuit filed by Washington against Nevada over river pollution goes directly before the Supreme Court.
Original jurisdiction is the right of a court to hear a case for the primary time. it can be outstanding from appellate jurisdiction which is the right of a court to check a case that has already been heard and decided upon through a lower courtroom.
The term Original jurisdiction refers back to the query of which courtroom has the authority (“jurisdiction') to listen to a felony case for the primary time. as example, the family law court has the authority to pay attention to a baby's custody case, but now not to listen to a housebreaking case. therefore, the family regulation courtroom has original jurisdiction.
In common law prison structures, authentic jurisdiction of a court docket is the strength to pay attention to a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, while a higher courtroom has the power to check a decreased court docket's choice.
Learn more about the original jurisdiction here: https://brainly.com/question/342388
#SPJ1
Madison Mayberry, a black woman, has worked in the mailroom at Worldwide Pictures for 16 years. When a mailroom supervisor position becomes open, Madison applies for the job but she is not selected. Instead, Renee Alton, the director of administration, hires Sally Wright, a white woman. When Madison complains to Renee, she says that she selected Sally because they are best friends and Sally needed a better job after her divorce. Madison files a complaint of racial discrimination with the EEOC.
Select one:
a. Madison will not prevail because it would be an undue hardship for Sally if she were not selected for the supervisory job.
b. Madison will prevail on her complaint because Renee's explanation is unbelievable and is an obvious pretext for discrimination.
c. Madison will prevail on her complaint because she is clearly better qualified than the person who was selected and that person is of a different race.
d. Madison will not prevail because not every decision that is arbitrary or unfair is discrimination.
Answer: Madison will not prevail because not every decision that is arbitrary or unfair is discrimination.
Explanation:
Based on the issues discussed in the question, if Madison files a complaint of racial discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC), it is highly unlikely that Madison will prevail based on the facts that were presented in this summary.
Madison already made a complaint to Renee who told her that she gave Sally the job because they are friends and she needed a better job after her divorce. There's no issue regarding discrimination in what happened on this case.
Fro her to prevail, she must prove specific violation in this case or demonstrate a pattern of discrimination in the workplace that has resulted in a race favored over another.
What should you NOT do during a hostage rescue attempt? (Antiterrorism Scenario Training, Page 4)
Based on Anti-Terrorism: We should not try to assist hostage rescue team during a hostage rescue attempt.
Anti terrorism:
Counter-terrorism (also known as anti-terrorism), also known as anti-terrorism, encompasses the practices, military tactics, techniques, and strategies used by governments, law enforcement, corporations, and intelligence agencies to combat or eliminate terrorism. doing. A counter-terrorism strategy is a government's motivation to use the tools of national power to defeat terrorists, the organizations they support, and the networks within them.
Hostage Rescue Operation:
Hostage rescue operations are time sensitive, risky and require robust and well-developed skills to ensure a successful outcome. Our Advanced Hostage Rescue course incorporates current doctrine and provides students with state-of-the-art hostage rescue tactics, techniques and procedures. According to theory, four principles are essential to a successful hostage rescue operation: surprise, intelligence, operator skill, and deception. These principles are derived from analysis of special operations planning models, personal experience, and six historical case studies.
According to theory, four principles are essential to a successful hostage rescue operation: surprise, intelligence, pilot skill, and deception. These principles are derived from analysis of special operations planning models, personal experience, and six historical case studies.
Learn more about Anti-Terrorism:
https://brainly.com/question/30141495
#SPJ4
Law help please
What is a law?
Explanation:
law is a kind of rule that is used in big society . like a city or country.
for example : city law
important note : do not use the word "law" for small societies like a family or a school!!
according to dictionary : law : the whole system of rules in a city or country that all of the people in that must obey .
When a crime is committed, how does itreach the attention of the police?
Answer:
When a crime is committed, there are several ways it can reach the attention of the police:
Emergency Calls: If the crime is in progress or it is an emergency, people may call the police on the emergency number (such as 911 in the United States) to report the incident. Emergency calls typically get a quick response from the police.
Non-Emergency Calls: If the crime is not an emergency or is not currently in progress, people may call the non-emergency number of the local police department to report the incident.
On-Duty Police Officers: Police officers who are on duty, patrolling the area or investigating other incidents, may come across the crime in progress or notice suspicious behavior and take action accordingly.
Surveillance Systems: Surveillance cameras or other security systems may capture the crime on video or audio, and the police may be alerted by the system or by someone monitoring the system.
Witnesses: Witnesses to the crime may contact the police or provide information to the police about the crime.
Explanation:
What market forces influence wages?
Answer:The market forces that influence wages are the supply and demand for labor.
Explanation:
Officers Jack and Daniels witness a suspect breaking into a parked car on the Bellevue College campus and observe him removing a purse from the front seat. The suspect then runs down the street and the officers follow him. The suspect then runs into a neighboring apartment and refuses to allow the officers into his apartment, claiming that they need a search warrant. Is the suspect correct
Answer:
The suspect is not correct.
Explanation:
It is true that police officers can only enter an apartment with a search warrant. However, federal law makes an exception for cases of flagrante delicto where the police have to chase a suspect and he enters an apartment to seek shelter, as shown in the above question. In that case, the police could, in fact, enter the apartment even without the search warrant and make the arrest of the miscreant.
What leadership qualities must a president have in order to make the best use of his cabinet of advisors?
A clear vision for the nation's future, the ability to inspire others, and a willingness to take risks are some traits that excellent leadership qualities that presidents frequently exhibit.
What makes leadership so crucial?Provides direction and propels the team forward. A leader gives the team direction by outlining goals and objectives in detail so that everyone on the team is aware of the ultimate target they are working toward. enables team members to perform at their highest level. A strong leader is able to give his or her team members duties that play to their strengths since they are aware of their abilities and skills. assumes accountability for decisions. To prevent work from being delayed when the team is unable to decide between several options, a leader steps up and makes a decision on behalf of the group. Offer to help with new tasks. When your manager or supervisor requests more assistance, offer to take on more jobs.
To know more about leadership visit:
brainly.com/question/28487636
#SPJ4
Paying taxes, voting, jury duty and obeying the laws are all examples of-
Personal Responsibilities
O Government Responsibilities
O Civic Responsibilities
O Mandatory Responsibilities
Answer:
Civic Responsibilities
Explanation:
A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.
Answer:
Civic Responsibility
Explanation:
Stevens, a citizen of the state of Oklahoma, was involved in an automobile accident with Jackson, a citizen of the state of Alabama. Stevens is injured and wishes to sue. What is the jurisdiction and why?
The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.
case study on climate change and migration and its effects on indigenous populations in the south of mexico and central america
Climate change and migration have an impact on communities in the southern regions of Central America and Mexico, which can lead to changes in or extinctions of significant cultural animals as well as soil degradation, and floods.
Due to the climate issue, indigenous tribes are suffering from "ecological bereavement, loss of environment, and traditional knowledge."
According to the Health of Canadians in a Changing Climate, "the changing climate will exasperate the health and socioeconomic inequalities already encountered by First Nations, Inuit, as well as people, which include respiratory, cardio-vascular, water- and food-borne, chronic, and infectious diseases, in addition to financial strain as well as food insecurity.
Learn more about Climate Change at
https://brainly.com/question/28779953?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4