Answer:
True, the statement is correct about elected officials from all levels of government who are appointed by party committees to be delegates to the national convention of the Democratic Party. These officials are known as superdelegates, and they are not selected in primary elections or caucuses.
Explanation:
Superdelegates are unique to the Democratic Party, and they hold a significant role in the party's nomination process for the presidential candidate.
The superdelegate system was established in the early 1980s as a way to give party leaders and elected officials a voice in the nomination process, ensuring that their experience and influence would be taken into account when selecting a candidate.
Superdelegates are typically comprised of Democratic members of Congress, governors, former presidents, and other high-ranking party officials. They are free to support any candidate they choose, regardless of the outcome of primary elections or caucuses in their state.
This allows them to use their judgment and expertise to support the candidate they believe will be the strongest contender in the general election.
During the national convention, superdelegates, along with regular delegates who are chosen through primary elections or caucuses, cast their votes to determine the party's nominee.
This process is meant to balance the will of the party's voters with the wisdom of its leadership, ultimately leading to the selection of a strong and viable candidate for the presidency.
In conclusion, it is true that elected officials from all levels of government who are appointed by party committees to be delegates to the national convention of the Democratic Party, known as superdelegates, are not selected in primary elections or caucuses.
Their role is to provide valuable input and experience in the candidate selection process, helping the party choose the best possible nominee for the general election.
To know more about superdelegates refer here: https://brainly.com/question/7294862#
#SPJ11
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
Select the correct answer.
Why is it a good idea to have a carbon monoxide detector in the home?
A.
to prevent an allergic reaction
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
C.
to warn members of the household of smoke from a fire
Answer:
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
b
Explanation:
In a general sense, what are crimes?
Answer:
Explanation:
Crimes are basically acts that are defiant/transgression of laws that if violated the person or people who acted can be punished.
if you were the chairman of Nepal Disabled women Association what plan would you make for the Disabled women's welfare and make them independent? prepare a detail plan.
Answer:
1 :Provide vocational training to make them independent.
2:Give them support.
3:Conduct awareness programmes.
4: As a chairperson I will try as much as I can provide them their rights.
5: Provide decision makin power.
6: Leverage technology to develop skills.
7: Provide training to improve the required skills for independence.
8: Consider options for learning, employment or volunteering.
viola and antonio collide while skateboarding at the skate park. both of their skateboards are totaled, and both parties are injured. the day after the collision, antonio gives viola a brand-new skateboard. viola later sues antonio for negligence, and at trial, viola seeks to testify that antonio gave them a brand-new skateboard the day after the event. antonio objects. the judge should:
The judge should sustain the objection.
Gifts that are given after an event cannot be used as evidence of negligence in the event. Such evidence could be used to establish a previous relationship between the two parties, but not for establishing negligence.
The gift of a brand-new skateboard given to Viola the day after the event cannot be used to prove that Antonio was negligent in the skateboarding collision. The gift was an act of kindness and not an admission of guilt. Negligence is an action taken before or during an event that causes harm.
Evidence used to establish negligence must be established before or during the event, not after. Any evidence that is introduced after an event cannot be used to prove negligence, because it cannot be established that it was done before or during the event.
Therefore, the judge should sustain the objection and not allow Viola to use the skateboard given to her after the event as evidence of negligence.
To know more about Evidence click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/15880833#
#SPJ11
Do you believe that a private security guard exclusively employed by a retail store should be obligated to recite the "Miranda warnings" to a shoplifting suspect? If so, what do you believe the repercussions of failing to do so should be?
To prevent theft, misuse of company property, and on-site usage of illegal substances or alcohol, many organisations have policies establishing processes for searching vehicles, lockers, or personal possessions.
WHAT IS Private security ?The company may need to demonstrate that the search was reasonable, that there was some grounds to suspect an employment crime had occurred, and that the search would lead to the discovery of additional evidence if these rules are challenged by labour unions or in court.
The business might also need to demonstrate that the policy is followed consistently throughout the workforce or facility and that it doesn't single out any particular people or groups for criticism.
Learn more about Miranda warnings here
https://brainly.com/question/30105739
#SPJ1
When you make a choice, the experience from what would have been your second option is called
trade-off
supply
demand
opportunity cost
Answer:
I believe it's opportunity cost - (D)
Explanation: I think this because the exact definition of opportunity cost is - "The loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen" which fit's perfect in this scenario here's an EX. you want to go to the movies that's your first option your second option is to go to an arcade but you don't so that experience you could've had you didn't is called opportunity cost which is what this question is referring to. Hope this helps have a good day!
Answer:
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
rate 5 stars and thank
a contract for car insurance is governed by: group of answer choices the restatement of torts all of the answers are correct the uniform commercial code common law
Benefits of the european and liberian from the transatlantic trade.
The European and Liberian societies greatly benefited from the transatlantic trade in various ways. Europeans experienced economic growth due to increased access to resources, labor, and new markets. The transatlantic trade provided them with raw materials such as sugar, cotton, and tobacco, which were essential for their growing industries. Additionally, European countries expanded their colonial empires, gaining control over territories and populations, which increased their global influence.
The slave trade was another aspect of the transatlantic trade that immensely benefited European countries, as it supplied them with a cheap and abundant labor force. Liberians, on the other hand, benefited from the transatlantic trade through the introduction of new crops, technologies, and cultural exchanges. Europeans brought crops like cassava, maize, and plantains, which became staples in the Liberian diet. The new technologies introduced by Europeans, such as metallurgy and textile production, significantly improved local industries. The cultural exchanges resulting from the transatlantic trade led to the blending of African and European traditions, creating unique art, music, and languages. Both European and Liberian societies experienced significant benefits from the transatlantic trade, such as economic growth, access to new resources and markets, improved industries, and rich cultural exchanges.
to know about transatlantic trade visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14260809
#SPJ11
Station 3: complete this for brainliest
(a) In order to get justice done to, it follows the sequence of steps below:
1. The first step to obtain Justice is to go to a police station to officially lay a complain about a suspect. The man in the picture E is the complainant who come to lodge a complain.
2. The second step from the picture above is picture F. In this picture it consist of an investigation scene and the arrest of the suspect.
3. The next order is the a CCTV image at the crime scene. This is an evidence. Picture D is the evidence.
4. In the fourth step, there is a presentation of evidence by that man standing. The evidence is presented in picture B.
5. The suspect, now a criminal is being investigated at the police station for interrogation. This happened in picture A
6. Finally, the criminal is being charged to the court to for judgment by the lawyer. Picture C identifies this.
(b) A testimonial evidence differs from physical evidence in that a testimonial evidence made by a witness to confirm the action of a criminal and this is done under a oath. On the order hand, a physical evidence is that evidence presented inform of image, test, object, material, fingerprint on weapon, or any other physical evidence at the crime seen.
Understanding a physical evidenceThis simply refers to any identifyable evidence which confirms that a suspect is a criminal or performed the criminal action at the the crime scene.
In conclusion, when we notice any strange behavior or action in our environment, we should first go lodge a complain in the police station.
Read more on evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/375033
#SPJ1
Who must be properly licensed and receive general awareness/familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazmat
Answer:
All Hazmat (hazard materials) employees must be properly licensed and receive general awareness and familiarization training to transport and handle ammunition and other hazardous materials.
Explanation:
This unique training is called the "HAZMAT Familiarization and Safety in Transportation" course. The course aims to provide the following trainings: applicability and responsibility, emergency response, general awareness/familiarization, and security awareness. HAZMAT employees learn the hazard class (gas, liquid, explosive, etc.) and what each class is capable of doing. This knowledge allows the HAZMAT employee to safely transport or store hazardous materials and to correctly respond to emergencies that they could face. The training also enables HAZMAT employees to safely control and contain a HAZMAT accident, thereby protecting the general public.
Any help?
What type of cases do district courts hear and how do they rule?
How does committees and political parties operate?
Ronald buy a motorbike from natalie for the amount of r35 000.00. natalie takes the money, but does not hand over the motorbike to ronald. can ronald approach the magistrate's court and ask for specific performance of the agreement to the effect that natalie hand over the motorbike to him?
An individual is arrested for stealing mail from a United
States Post Office located in the city of Orlando, Florida.
Which court would have original jurisdiction in this case?
Orlando City Court
Orange County Trial Court
United States District Court
Florida District Court of Appeals
Answer:
United States District Court
Explanation:
I think it would be the United States District Court because this is the US mail we're talking about. If this was like a local UPS, FedEx, or Amazon truck it would probably be something different.
Answer:
I think its United states district court
Explanation:
most states apply a legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff. This standard is known as the:
The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.
This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.
Learn more about comparative negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
A workers are guaranteed a certain income
B. Employers are encouraged to hire more workers
C. Employers are required to train more workers
D. Workers are allowed to organize into unions
Answer: B
Explanation:
The economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law can be summarized, as workers being guaranteed a certain income. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
This means that employers must pay their employees at least the minimum wage, providing workers with a baseline level of compensation.
By ensuring that workers receive a certain income, the minimum wage law helps to protect them from extremely low wages and potential exploitation.
It establishes a basic standard of living and provides economic security for workers, particularly those in low-wage jobs.
Thus, this economic benefit aims to improve workers' financial well-being and reduce poverty rates by setting a floor on wages in the labor market.
Learn more about minimum wage law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31859230
#SPJ2
Obama's executive order on the accessibility of private handguns relates
directly to this case *
O Marbury v. Madison
D. C. V. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
O U.S. vs. Nixon
Answer: It relates to the D.C. v. Heller case.
Explanation: This case has to do with the second amendment that allows an individual to bear arms.
How many different laws are there will give best answer brainest
Answer:
There are five types of legal system i.e. civil law; common law; customary law; religious law and mixed law. In Indian Judicial System there are four types of law. The Criminal law is enforced by the police
Explanation: or This article provides you with some essential federal laws you should know as an American citizen.
The Social Security Act (1835) ...
Freedom of Information Act. ...
The Pendleton Act (1883) ...
The G.I. ...
The Patriot Act (2001) ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964. ...
No Child Left Behind (2001) ...
The Privacy Act.
Answer:
approximately 200–600
Explanation:
If you park your car with a parking garage company and they provide you with a ticket stating that they are not responsible for any damage done to your vehicle can you still sue the company if one of the employees sat on your car and caused damages?
To avoid being distracted while driving, you should...
How does collateral affect the interest rate on a bond
The presence of collateral can affect the interest rate on a bond in the following ways:
1. Collateral can lower the interest rate on a bond: When collateral is provided, the risk associated with the bond decreases. This means that the investor's investment is secured by the collateral in the event that the issuer defaults on the bond. This reduction in risk may lead to a lower interest rate on the bond.
2. Collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: On the other hand, if the collateral is of low quality, it may not be as valuable in the event of a default. In this case, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
3. No collateral can increase the interest rate on a bond: When there is no collateral backing a bond, the bond is considered to be unsecured. This means that the investor's investment is not secured by any assets.
As a result, investors may demand a higher interest rate to compensate for the additional risk associated with the bond.
In many states, a plaintiff who willingly enters a dangerous situation and is injured will be barred from recovery even if the dangerous condition is not his fault. True or false?.
This is true. In the law of tort if a person goes ahead to willing enter into a dangerous situation then they would not be liable to getting any forms of recovery.
What is a recovery?This is the term that is used to refer to the compensation that the person who is suing another person for an injury or any other forms of grievances is to get.
The person would not get this here based on the circumstances that surrounds the issues here. They had known the effects of the action but they also willing entered into it. Hence they would not get a recovery
Read more on recovery here: https://brainly.com/question/14980437
#SPJ1
What is the answer ASAP please
Answer:
as soon as possible
without delay; promptly.
Which of the following criteria is necessary to qualify as a dependent of another taxpayer? (Check all that apply.)
a. Must be a citizen of the U.S. or a resident of the U.S., Canada, or Mexico
b. Must NOT be required to file a tax return of his own
c. Must be considered both a qualifying child and a qualifying relative
d. Must NOT file a joint return unless there is no tax liability on the couple's return and no tax liability on either return if they filed separately
e. Must be considered either a qualifying child or a qualifying relative
The correct option is A. Must be a citizen of the U.S. or a resident of the U.S., Canada, or Mexico criteria are necessary to qualify as a dependent of another taxpayer.
A taxpayer is an individual, business, or organization that is required by law to pay taxes to the government. Taxes are levied on income, profits, property, goods and services, and other forms of economic activity. The funds collected from taxpayers are used by the government to fund public services such as infrastructure, education, healthcare, social welfare, national defense, and other programs that benefit society as a whole.
The amount of taxes that a taxpayer is required to pay is determined by the tax laws and regulations of the country or jurisdiction in which they reside or operate. Taxpayers are generally required to file tax returns and make payments to the government on a regular basis, usually annually or quarterly. Failure to comply with tax laws can result in penalties, fines, and legal action.
To learn more about Taxpayers visit here:
brainly.com/question/14782474
#SPJ4
Those who believe the Constitution should be subject to a literal interpretation
Answer:
Another way to say "literal interpretation" is strict interpretation. I believe that the democrats, headed by Jefferson in the early 1800s, followed strict interpretation, even though he followed loose interpretation when he purchased the louisiana territory.
reading questions for just mercy chapters 9-12 ch 9. im here 1. does it seem like the judge now believes ralph myers? 2. what are your impressions of mrs. williams? 3. stevenson remarks on several physical actions he takes during the trial. what are they they effective? 4. of all the evidence presented in this trial, which is the most likely to sway the judge's ru which is the least likely? 5. should stevenson and o'conner be concerned?
It is unclear whether the judge now believes Ralph Myers or not. The judge seems to be questioning the credibility of both Myers and Walter McMillian's defense team. Mrs. Williams is portrayed as a resilient and strong woman who is determined to fight for her son's freedom. She is also shown to be a caring and supportive mother.
Stevenson takes several physical actions during the trial, such as making eye contact with the jury and speaking directly to them, using body language to emphasize certain points, and standing close to the judge during arguments. These actions are effective in conveying his message and engaging the audience.The most likely evidence to sway the judge's ruling would be the eyewitness testimony of Myers, even though it is known to be unreliable. The least likely evidence to sway the judge's ruling would be the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution.
Stevenson and O'Connor should be concerned about the outcome of the trial, but they remain determined to fight for McMillian's freedom and seek justice. They are aware of the challenges they face, but they continue to work hard and use every possible means to prove McMillian's innocence.happy to help you with your questions about Just Mercy chapters 9-12. In Chapter 9, it does not seem like the judge fully believes Ralph Myers, as there is no clear indication of his complete trust in Myers' testimony. However, the judge appears to be somewhat open to considering the evidence presented. My impressions of Mrs. Williams are that she is a caring and compassionate individual, showing concern for Walter McMillian's situation and his family's well-being.
To know more about freedom Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ11
"The minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."
What Enlightenment idea is reflected in this quote from Thomas Jefferson?
Direct democracy
Natural rights
Checks and balances
Separation of powers
Answer:
Natural Right
Explanation:
The answer is Natural right
Answer:
Natural rights
hope this helps :}
the us supreme court decision in olmstead v. l.c. directed us states to
The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C. handed down in 1999, directed U.S. states to provide services to individuals with disabilities in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.
The case involved two women with mental disabilities who were voluntarily admitted to a state-run psychiatric hospital but sought to receive community-based treatment instead In the Olmstead decision, the Supreme Court held that unjustified segregation.
disabilities constitutes discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Court ruled that public entities, including states, must provide services to people with disabilities in the most integrated setting possible, giving them the opportunity to live and participate in their communities rather than being unnecessarily institutionalized.
To know more about U.S. Supreme Court:- https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
Identify a decision-making model that can be applied to encourage ethical practices when working with Malcolm Day being on a work release from prison
Answer:
One decision-making model that can be applied to encourage ethical practices when working with Malcolm Day is the ethical decision-making model. This model involves a six-step process that can help individuals or organizations make ethical decisions. The six steps are:
Gather the facts: This involves identifying all the relevant facts related to the situation involving Malcolm Day and his work release from prison.
Define the ethical issues: This involves identifying the key ethical issues and conflicts that arise in the situation. For example, is it ethical to hire someone on work release from prison?
Identify the stakeholders: This involves identifying all the parties who have an interest in the situation, including Malcolm Day, his employer, the prison, and society at large.
Consider the available alternatives: This involves identifying all the possible courses of action that could be taken in the situation, such as hiring Malcolm Day or not hiring him.
Assess the consequences: This involves evaluating the potential outcomes and consequences of each alternative course of action, both positive and negative.
Make a decision: Based on the evaluation of the consequences, a decision can be made that is ethical and in the best interests of all stakeholders involved.
By following this ethical decision-making model, it will help ensure that ethical practices are encouraged and implemented when working with Malcolm Day. It will also ensure that the interests of all stakeholders involved are taken into account when making any decisions.
Explanation: