URGENT! DUE TONIGHT!
Read the case "Bates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 413 F. Supp. 2d 763 (S.D. Miss. 2006)" and summarize the facts of the case and explain how the Court viewed Wal-Mart's defense in this case as it pertains to trespassing.

Answer:

nine justices

Explanation:

There are currently nine justices on the Supreme Court, though that number is not set in the Constitution and has changed throughout history. There are eight associate justices, and one chief justice. Supreme Court justices are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They serve a life term.

Answer:

ok don't worry, first i dont think youll go to jail and if you do its probably overnight unless you did something worse, then it'll be longer depending on what you did. But i doubt youll go to jail for one punch, maybe get yelled at but you'll be fine

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it's a crime and it shows no manners

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

Answer:

The overview of the particular question becomes demonstrated in the following portion on the clarification.

Explanation:

Explanation:

Vollmer was a highly progressive police chief who made the city of Berkeley the center of his innovations. He became Berkeley’s first police chief in the early 1900s and began advancing policing in its use of technology, training and, most importantly, education. He influenced so many people within and outside of the Berkeley Police Department that his ideas began gaining traction first in California, then across the United States, and eventually around the world. When people spoke of good policing in the first half of the 20th century, they spoke about August Vollmer. His was a household name by the 1920s, and by the 1940s he was featured in popular magazines such as Collier’s, True Detective and Reader’s Digest.

hope this helps you.

Answer:

Its "PI" first of all and the sum of pi is approximately equal to 3.14159 or π over 4. It has been represented by the Greek letter "π" since the mid-18th century, and is spelled out as "pi".

Explanation:

Hope that helped you

Give the other person brainliest

Answer:

what is this  

Explanation:

Answer:

This can make them harder to spot and more probable to being attracted to a traffic accident.

Explanation:

Motorcycles are smaller than cars. This makes them harder to spot and more probable to being attracted to a traffic accident.

A vehicle collides with another vehicle, a pedestrian, an animal, road debris, or another moving or stationary barrier, such as a tree, pole, or structure, to cause a traffic collision, also known as a motor vehicle collision.

Traffic accidents frequently result in harm to people and property, as well as financial expenses to society and those affected.

The most hazardous condition that people encounter on a regular basis is road travel, but the number of casualties from such accidents receives less media coverage than that of other, less common sorts of disaster.

Vehicle design, speed of operation, road design, weather, the environment on the road, driving abilities, impairment from alcohol, and behavior, particularly aggressive driving, distracted driving, speeding, and street racing, all increase the likelihood of crashes.

Learn more about traffic accident, here

https://brainly.com/question/12893844

#SPJ5

A set of laws in the south that enforced racial segregation is commonly referred to as "Jim Crow laws."

These laws were a system of legal racial segregation and discrimination in the United States that were in effect primarily in the southern and border states from the late 19th century to the 1960s.

These laws mandated racial segregation in many aspects of public life, including education, housing, transportation, and public facilities such as restaurants, restrooms, and drinking fountains. They also restricted the voting rights of African Americans and other people of color, through literacy tests and other discriminatory practices.

Jim Crow laws were a legacy of slavery and the post-Civil War period, where the Southern states, in order to maintain white supremacy, created a system of laws that institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination.

To learn more about Jim Crow laws

https://brainly.com/question/21634190

#SPJ4

In State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because he had voluntarily shared the information with a third party.

In the case of State v. Patino (2012), the justices argued that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his sent text messages because he had voluntarily shared the information with a third party. The Third Party Doctrine holds that when a person shares their information with a third party, they no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

As a result, the information becomes the property of the third party.In other words, when Patino sent text messages to another person, he effectively relinquished his privacy rights over that information. Because the recipient of the messages was a third party, the police had the legal right to access the messages without violating the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Learn more about Amendment's protections https://brainly.com/question/28949431

#SPJ11

Minimum mental ability necessary previously  by law for a party to enter into a contract and be obligated by it is known as the "contractual capacity."

depending Three categories of people are recognized by common law as not having the legal capacity to enter into contracts. Unmarried individuals under the age of eighteen (18) are generally entitled to engage into any contract that an adult may, voidable provided that the contract is not one that is expressly forbidden by law for minors (e.g., agreement to purchase cigarettes or alcohol). Contracts entered into by minors, however, are often voidable by the minor, unlike those entered into by adults. Contracts made by individuals who are inebriated at the time of contracting are also considered to be made by mentally incompetent or impaired individuals incompetent.

learn more about Contracts here:

https://brainly.com/question/4272013

#SPJ4

Some states have refocused juvenile justice efforts to include prevention and rehabilitation as goals because of increased crime.

The traditional approach of punishing juvenile offenders has not proven to be effective in reducing recidivism rates. Instead, many states are now prioritizing prevention efforts, such as early intervention and community-based programs, as well as rehabilitation programs that address the underlying issues that lead youth to commit crimes. These changes in approach are not only driven by the need to reduce crime rates but also by financial exigency. States are recognizing that investing in prevention and rehabilitation can be more cost-effective in the long run than incarcerating youth offenders.
Overall, the refocused juvenile justice efforts to include prevention and rehabilitation as goals reflect a growing understanding of the importance of addressing the root causes of juvenile delinquency and providing youth with the support and resources they need to succeed.

To know more about increased crime

https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ11

The arrangement described is an example of a simple contract. A simple contract is a contract that is formed without the need for a written agreement or any formalities, such as a signature or a witness.

A simple contract is an agreement between two parties that is based on mutual promises or obligations. In this case, Waynette and Tammy have agreed to a specific arrangement: Tammy will provide legal studies tutoring to Waynette, and Waynette will pay her $25 per hour for her services. This agreement does not need to be formal or in writing, but it must be based on an exchange of consideration (in this case, money for services).

The fact that Tammy is paid at the end of each hour suggests that this is a short-term, ongoing arrangement rather than a one-time transaction. However, without additional information about the duration and terms of the agreement, it is difficult to say more specifically what type of simple contract this might be.

Learn more about contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ11

Persons aged 65 or older have the lowest victimization rates for all types of crime.

As per the data published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, older adults are less likely to become victims of crimes than younger people. This could be due to a variety of factors, including their decreased involvement in high-risk activities and reduced opportunities for interaction with potential offenders. Additionally, older adults may be more cautious and vigilant when it comes to crime prevention strategies.

Incidences of property crime and violent crime among older adults are considerably low. Some common types of crimes against older people are: Abuse or neglect Elder abuse is a type of abuse that occurs when an elderly person is exploited or mistreated. Neglect or abuse by family members or other caretakers is a common form of elder abuse. Inadequate nutrition, lack of medical attention, and financial fraud are all examples of abuse and neglect.

Learn more about Bureau of Justice Statistics here: https://brainly.com/question/31107620

#SPJ11

The Social Security Act was enacted in 1935 and was the most significant piece of social welfare legislation in the United States. The main purpose of the Social Security Act was to provide economic security for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled.

Through the Act, a national system of social insurance was established that provided a guaranteed income for retired workers. The Act also provided unemployment insurance and aid to families with dependent children and the disabled.

Additionally, the Act set up government agencies to administer the programs, including the Social Security Administration, which is responsible for administering the Social Security program. The Social Security Act helped to protect individuals from the financial risks of old age, disability, and unemployment by providing a steady income for them.

know more about Security Act here

https://brainly.com/question/29218517#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The call it the companies act

Explanation:

The Exchange Act created the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that has oversight, as well as regulatory authority and disciplinary power, over the U.S. Securities industry, including brokerage firms and their reps, transfer agents, and the nation's Securities Self-Regulatory Organizations (“SROs”).

Answer:

All of the Laws

Explanation:

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?

The statement that is not true when it comes to the regulation of fighting words is:

D. Hate crime statutes may limit fighting words sanctions to cases in which the words seek to insult or provoke on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.

The correct statement is that hate crime statutes may enhance penalties for crimes motivated by bias or prejudice based on race, religion, or sexual orientation, but they do not necessarily limit fighting words sanctions to those specific categories. Hate crime statutes typically focus on the motivation behind the crime, rather than the specific content of the speech itself.

To know more about true
Visit https://brainly.com/question/33522612
#SPJ11

The Hart-Celler Act of 1965 was a significant immigration reform bill passed by the United States Congress that abolished the previous quota-based immigration system that had been in place since the 1920s.

The law removed race-based quotas and implemented a system that prioritized family reunification, professional skills, and refugee status. The Hart-Celler Act of 1965 helped transform the demographics of the United States and opened up the country to immigrants from all over the world.
However, the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 did not do all of the following:
1. It did not immediately lead to a significant increase in immigration from non-European countries. While the law abolished discriminatory quotas, it did not necessarily result in a sudden surge in immigration from non-European countries. It took a few years for immigration patterns to shift significantly.
2. It did not address all issues related to immigration. The Hart-Celler Act of 1965 focused primarily on abolishing discriminatory quotas and implementing a new immigration system. However, it did not address other issues related to immigration, such as border control, undocumented immigrants, and asylum seekers.
3. It did not eliminate all forms of discrimination in the immigration system. While the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 was a significant step towards eliminating race-based quotas, discrimination in the immigration system still persisted in other forms, such as in the selection criteria for professional skills and family reunification.
Overall, the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 was a significant immigration reform bill that helped transform the demographics of the United States. However, it did not address all issues related to immigration and did not eliminate all forms of discrimination in the immigration system.

To know more about Hart-Celler Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29039126
#SPJ11

1.  By analyzing these cartoons, we can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges, controversies, and public perception of the early New Deal initiatives.

2. While both speeches reflect a commitment to progressive ideals, they also exhibit notable differences in their understanding and approach to achieving progress.

Question One:

The author of this piece expresses bias toward immigrants in several ways. Firstly, the author characterizes immigrants as "handicapped" and highlights their ignorance of English, implying that they are incapable and inferior. Secondly, the author suggests that immigrants are desperate for work and will accept any job, regardless of its undesirable nature, reinforcing the stereotype of immigrants as desperate and willing to take advantage of. Lastly, the author emphasizes the burden that immigrants place on charitable organizations during times of unemployment, portraying them as a drain on society.

For example, the author states, "The immigrant man finds himself much handicapped when he tries to obtain work..." This quote reflects the bias by portraying immigrants as inherently disadvantaged in their ability to find employment due to their language barrier.

These biases contribute to a negative portrayal of immigrants as incapable and burdensome, perpetuating stereotypes and potentially shaping public opinion against them.

Question Two:

This document provides insights into the world of work in the early twentieth century, particularly for unskilled immigrants. It reveals that a significant portion of available work for immigrants was seasonal and located at a considerable distance from urban centers like Chicago. The work mentioned includes jobs in foundries, stock yards, mines, construction, harvest fields, and camps. These jobs were often short-term, poorly paid, and required the immigrants to constantly move from place to place in search of employment.

For example, the document states, "Much of this work is seasonal and is located at a great distance from the city... A large number of men are needed for a few months or weeks..." This quote highlights the temporary nature of the work and the need for immigrants to constantly relocate.

These insights have implications for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States during that time. Immigrants, particularly those lacking skills or language proficiency, were often relegated to low-paying and precarious jobs, subject to exploitation by contractors and employment agencies. The need for immediate work and limited options forced them into these undesirable positions, perpetuating a cycle of unskilled labor and making it difficult for them to improve their socioeconomic status.

Overall, this document reveals the challenges faced by unskilled immigrants in finding stable employment and sheds light on the exploitative nature of the labor market during the early twentieth century in the United States.

Know more about stereotype here:

https://brainly.com/question/30916993

#SPJ8

The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :

Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?

Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?

Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.

* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.

Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).

Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.

Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.

A(n) "unitary contract" requires complete performance by both parties, even if it appears to contain multiple parts. These contracts must be enforced or rejected in their entirety and these are generally unenforceable.

A unitary contract is a type of agreement that requires both parties to perform all of their obligations under the contract, regardless of how many parts or stages the performance may be divided into. This means that even if the contract appears to have several separate parts or stages, the parties are still required to perform all of their obligations in order for the contract to be considered valid and enforceable. However, if the parties have entered into a unitary contract, they are still required to perform all of the obligations outlined in the contract, including the design, construction, and final inspection phases, even if they appear to be separate.  In summary, a unitary contract requires complete performance by both parties and must be enforced or rejected in its entirety, making these contracts generally unenforceable.

To learn more about unitary contract here:

https://brainly.com/question/30428848

#SPJ4

In an emergency situation, Lori Render said to Mike, "who needs help." If Mike was injured while receiving help from Lori, he would most likely be prohibited from suing her for negligence under the Good Samaritan laws.

Good Samaritan laws are laws that protect individuals who provide assistance to those who are injured or in danger from being sued for negligence. These laws vary by state, but they are generally designed to encourage people to provide assistance without fear of legal repercussions. However, there are limitations to Good Samaritan laws, and they do not provide blanket immunity from all types of lawsuits. For example, if Lori acted with gross negligence or intentional misconduct, she could still be held liable for any harm caused to Mike.The legal concept that may apply to Lori Render's actions is called "Good Samaritan" laws. These laws are intended to protect individuals who voluntarily provide assistance to those in need during emergency situations from being sued for negligence.

Learn more about emergency situations here:

https://brainly.com/question/31109378

#SPJ11

Answer:

neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers

A license holder is prohibited from completing a type of contract because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law. The type of contract is a "fill-in-the-blank" contract.

Fill-in-the-blank contracts are contracts in which blanks are left for the user to fill in with terms and information that are specific to the contract's subject matter. The user then completes the contract by filling in the blanks with the necessary information.

The main problem with fill-in-the-blank contracts is that they are a one-size-fits-all approach to contracts, and they do not take into account the unique circumstances and needs of each party.The unauthorized practice of law occurs when someone who is not a licensed attorney or a licensed legal service provider engages in activities that are reserved for attorneys or legal service providers. Completing a fill-in-the-blank contract is considered the unauthorized practice of law because it involves the interpretation and application of legal terms, which is a legal service that is reserved for licensed attorneys.

To know more about licensed visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15829119

#SPJ11

The primary purpose of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, also known as the Motor Voter Law, was to simplify and enhance voter registration processes by allowing eligible citizens to register to vote while obtaining or renewing their driver's licenses or applying for social services.

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 aimed to increase voter registration and participation by streamlining the registration process. It required states to offer voter registration opportunities at various government agencies, particularly motor vehicle offices and public assistance offices. The law intended to make voter registration more accessible and convenient, especially for individuals who might not have previously registered. By integrating voter registration into routine interactions with government agencies, the Motor Voter Law sought to remove barriers to voter registration and encourage broader civic engagement.

To know more about the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, click here: brainly.com/question/29784034

#SPJ11

It is the duty of the court to enforce an agreement as long as it is legally binding. Tina and Chevy had an agreement between them in which Chevy purchased ten sunglasses from Tina.

Chevy returned the sunglasses, and insisted that Tina refund her $13.00 for each of the 10 sunglasses. Tina can refuse to refund the money if there was no initial agreement that she would do so. The court, however, can require Tina to refund the money if there was an agreement between them to refund the money.An agreement is a contract between two parties that is legally binding. In this scenario, Shiv made a promise to pay Kush $1000 in consideration of the fact that he received an A in his business law course. In this case, there is a valid contract since there is an offer, consideration, and acceptance. Kush fulfilled the condition that Shiv laid out; thus, Shiv is legally obligated to pay him $1000.There is no contract between LeBow and the fire department. The dean at GHALL said that if the fire department puts out the fire, LeBow will donate a brand new fire truck to the fire department. However, the fire department was not obliged to accept the offer. There was no agreement between the two parties to enforce the donation of the fire truck. As a result, there was no legally binding agreement that could be enforced in court.In the first scenario, Chevy and Tina had an agreement between them. Chevy purchased ten sunglasses from Tina and then returned them and requested a refund of $13.00 for each of them. Tina can refuse to refund the money if there was no initial agreement that she would do so. However, if there was an agreement between them to refund the money, the court can require Tina to refund the money.The second scenario between Shiv and Kush is a valid contract. Shiv made a promise to pay Kush $1000, and in exchange, Kush fulfilled the condition that Shiv laid out. In this case, there is an offer, consideration, and acceptance. Shiv is legally obligated to pay Kush $1000.In the third scenario, there is no contract between LeBow and the fire department. The dean of GHALL said that if the fire department puts out the fire, LeBow will donate a brand new fire truck to the fire department. The fire department was not obliged to accept the offer. There was no agreement between the two parties to enforce the donation of the fire truck. As a result, there was no legally binding agreement that could be enforced in court.The court will require Tina to refund the money to Chevy if there was an agreement between them to refund the money. The second scenario is a valid contract, and Shiv is legally obligated to pay Kush $1000. The third scenario does not have a legally binding agreement that can be enforced in court since there was no agreement between the two parties to enforce the donation of the fire truck.

To Know More about scenario visit:

brainly.com/question/32720595

#SPJ11