What are residual disability income insurance payments based on?
A flat benefit amount stated in the policy
O 50% of the full disability amount
The amount of the insured's income is reduced by the disability
O The insured must be totally disabled

Answer:

New Jersey does not recognize common law marriages. In Pennsylvania, a couple may claim to be common law married if there is clear and convincing evidence that the couple exchanged words, in the present tense, for the specific purpose of establishing the legal relationship of husband and wife.

Explanation:

Answer: Protect America from Poor Leadership.

Explanation:

It is shown from the excerpt, that some people believe that the process by which the U.S. president is elected is very well guarded to ensure it produces sound leadership.

Alexander Hamilton was so full of praise for the process that he went further to state that he believed that the Electoral College was so close to perfection that it was at the very least excellent and this excellence would protect the people from poor leadership.

Answer:

A. Protect America from Poor Leadership.

Explanation:

Hope this will help

Answer:appointing members of cabinet

Answer:

The answer is (B) (appointing members of the cabinet)

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

Governments can offer financial assistance to private businesses making investments through the use of economic incentives. Incentives can include tax abatements, tax revenue sharing, grants, infrastructure assistance, no or low-interest financing, free land, tax credits and other financial resources. But the question is, why? Why do government agencies invest public resources to support business development? The answer lies within the classic “but for” requirement of economic incentives. Understanding the “but for” and how to properly prepare the information required by government entities is critical to your project’s success.

Explanation:

Here is my best answer to help you out.

A stereotype is a broadly held, simplified, and essentialist conviction about a particular pack. Bunches are much of the time generalized based on sex, direction nature, race and identity, ethnicity, age, financial status, language, etc.

Stereotype danger is characterized as a "socially commenced mental danger that emerges when one is in a circumstance or working on something for which a negative stereotype around one's gathering applies"

Stereotype danger alludes to the gamble of affirming negative generalizations about a person's racial, ethnic, orientation, or social gathering which can make a high mental burden and diminish scholastic concentration and execution. The term was instituted by the specialists Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson.

Rehashed encounters of generalization danger can prompt an endless loop of decreased certainty, lackluster showing, and loss of interest in the significant area of accomplishment. Generalization danger has been contended to show a decrease in the presentation of people who have a place with adversely generalized gatherings.

To learn more about stereotypes here

https://brainly.com/question/13281670

#SPJ4

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Out of the given statements, the statement, ''psychoactive substances were freely available from a variety of different sources,'' is true about the sale of patent medicine in the United States of America in the years during the late nineteenth and early 20th centuries. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The psychoactive substances had an abundance of availability during the 19th and 20th centuries. This situation came to the rise, as the demand for patent medicines grew rapidly during this period. Moreover, the supply and production capacities were also sufficient to fulfill the market demand in the United States of America.

Learn more about patent medicine here:

https://brainly.com/question/25749134

#SPJ4

Complete question

Identify the true statements about the sale of patent medicines in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

A. Psychoactive substances were freely available from a variety of different sources.

B. Psychoactive substances had a lot of shortage during the 19th and 20th centuries

C. Both A and B

D. None of the above

The option that is typically not addressed in a buyer agency agreement is A. The type of property that the buyer is seeking whether or not the brokers may disclose the name of the buyer.

While the other options listed (B, C, and D) are typically addressed in a buyer agency agreement, the specific type of property that the buyer is seeking is not typically included in this agreement. Instead, the buyer's preferences and criteria for the property are usually discussed during initial consultations or conversations between the buyer and their real estate agent. The buyer agency agreement focuses more on the contractual relationship between the buyer and the real estate agent, including matters such as disclosure requirements, confidentiality, and the need for specialized assistance.

Learn more about agreement here

https://brainly.com/question/15420974

#SPJ11

Answer:Lessons from Benjamin Frankin are many.  One of the key people who helped found America was Benjamin Franklin. During our recent trip to Philadelphia my wife and I were delighted to be able to peer into American history and learn about some interesting and unknown facts about who Ben Franklin was and what he stood for.Lessons from America’s first Millionaire Benjamin Franklin are many.

Explanation:

Answer:

gives them the right to advance the due date of the part that they didn't pay for with (interest most likely)

Answer:

Retreatism refers to rejection of both the goals and the means, and rebellion occurs when individuals reject both and then create new goals and means to pursue. According to Merton's theory, ritualism occurs when a person rejects the normative goals of their society but nonetheless continues to participate in the means of attaining them.

In Crime and Punishment, the characters have multiple names to illustrate their various facets of their personalities, lives, and backgrounds. Throughout the novel, characters take on different names that identify them as members of particular classes or describe their personalities.

The use of different names is a literary device used to signify character development, changing identities, and a desire to hide from the past. Additionally, the characters’ multiple names are a reflection of the complex, contradictory nature of their lives and personalities. For example, Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov is a protagonist who has an inner conflict between his desire to prove his superiority and his intense guilt after committing murder.

His various names reflect different aspects of his life, such as his family background, his student status, his friends, and his involvement in the murder. In conclusion, the use of multiple names in Crime and Punishment is a reflection of the complexity of the characters and the psychological depth of the novel.

To know more about Crime and Punishment visit-

brainly.com/question/30637034

#SPJ11

The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.

When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.

Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844

#SPJ11

A description of the responsibilities the offices of the House General Counsel and Senate Legal Counsel played in these investigations is included in the report's conclusion.

What are examples responsibilities?

An obligation to complete a task is one example of a responsibility. Your parents, for instance, anticipate that you will brush your teeth. It is your job to clean your teeth every day since it is "a responsibility" to do so. Another illustration is that your teacher anticipates you to complete your homework promptly and to the best of your ability. Therefore, it is your duty to complete your assignment and do it to the best of your ability.

A duty could be how you are required to behave. For instance, if you go play at the park, your parents anticipate that you won't play in a way that endangers you or another else.

Know more about conclusion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/78686

#SPJ1

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The correct answer for customer listing to be considered PII would be John Smith – DOB 1/1/1965.

Any representation of information that enables the identity of an individual to whom the information applies to be logically deduced by either direct or indirect means is referred to as personal identifiable information (PII).

PII refers to any data on a person kept by an organization, including (1) any details that can be used to identify or trace a person, including a name, social security number, birthdate, place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric data.

To know more about PII visit-

https://brainly.com/question/30023988

#SPJ1

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.

The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.

In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.

A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.

To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579

#SPJ4

Answer:

John Locke

John Locke takes for granted the necessity of taxes, but stipulates three conditions for taxes and other government appropriations of property to be legitimate. The taxes cannot be so high that some individuals would be better off in the state of nature than as taxpayers within the nation.

Explanation:

mark me as brainliest thank you

Answer:

John Locke

Explanation:

Answer:

Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)

Explanation:

Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.

The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.

Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.

Answer:

he’s inside me

Explanation:

Trial courts  are the initial venue where legal disputes are heard, evidence is presented, and witnesses testify appellate courts while  focus on the application of the law and the interpretation of legal principles rather than re-examining facts or evidence.

In trial courts, judges or juries make decisions based on the presented evidence and applicable laws. They determine the facts of the case, decide guilt or liability, and may also award damages or impose penalties.

Appellate courts do not make decisions on guilt or liability. Instead, they review the decisions of trial courts to ensure legal standards were followed correctly and that no errors occurred in the application of the law.

Learn more about trial courts here:

https://brainly.com/question/29619372

#SPJ4

For purposes of determining subject matter jurisdiction, a corporation is a resident of. For diversity purposes, a corporation is considered a resident of its state of incorporation and the state in which it has its principal place of business.

In order for a court to hear a particular type of claim that is brought before it, it must have subject-matter jurisdiction.

When a court has subject-matter jurisdiction, it has the power to hear and decide on cases belonging to the same general category as the current proceedings. One such instance is the ability of a bankruptcy court to only hear bankruptcy cases.

Fiscal value, a court's geographic jurisdiction, and the court's subject matter are the main factors in determining jurisdiction.

To learn more about jurisdiction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12448353

#SPJ4

Answer:

Ensuring justice for all citizens

Explanation:

According to the information the vocabulary is related with each meaning.

Here are the explanations for each vocabulary word in relation to the given descriptions:

In conclusion, forensic science often relies on the interpretation of bloodstain patterns to help reconstruct the sequence of events leading up to a crime. Understanding the different types of bloodstain patterns and what causes them is crucial in order to accurately analyze and interpret the evidence.

Learn more about forensic science in: https://brainly.com/question/29773304

#SPJ1

Answer:

True

Explanation:

alcohol is a depressant and marijuana is a stimulant

At any one time, you shouldn't take your eyes off the road for more than a few seconds. If the child requires assistance, safely pull over into a parking space.

To maintain control, always use two hands when driving. Reducing speed will improve traction and road contact for the tyres. Raise your separation from other vehicles considerably. Be cautious of other motorists and potential hazards in your area.

It is customary to say something along the lines of "drive safe" or to wish someone "safe driving" or to remind them to drive carefully. It is a typical technique to convey care for another person's welfare.

To know more about safe driving visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/16988162

#SPJ1

The prosecution witness's testimony should be:

The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.

What do you mean by cross examination?

The proper examination and questioning of a witness by the adverse party is known as cross-examination.  It gives the opposing party a chance  to determine the weaknesses of a witness's testimony.

The main aim of cross  examination is to strengthen an individual's case.  The scope of cross-examination is confirming the witness's testimony, knowledge, and credibility

Rules of Cross-Examination

Hence ,The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.

To know more about Cross examination from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28114975

#SPJ4