What are the 3 types of local govern?

Answer:

To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish ...is needed

Explanation:

if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest

Answer:

The title of the poem The Leader and the Led by Niyi Osundare speaks to the various dimensions of attitude within the ambit of Leadership.

It speaks to the indivisible union between leadership and followership.

In the first line, he opens up the poem by describing the attribute of the Leader as a lion who is unafraid to stake his claim. He contrasts that with the Antelope who is always fearful and reminded of the paws of the Lion.

It speaks therefore to the requirement of the Leader to be strong when he or she has to be. It also indicates that the leader cannot always be nice.

By an Ironic statement in line 9, he points out the reason why a duplicitous person cannot lead. He likens such a person to a Zebra. Duplicity equals the inability to inspire trust. Trust is an essential and critical quality for a leader. In line 10 he communicates that the followers are not as powerless as they have been painted to be in line 6 as fearful Impalas, for they also have the ability to finger the flaws of a leader to limelight and remove their following from he or she.

Lines 19 and 20 suffices in the description of a balanced leader as one who must be firm when it is required and gentle when the occasion calls for it.

The entire imagery painted by the poem is a fine depiction of leadership using metaphorical analogies of the animal kingdom.

For as in the animal kingdom, animals have leadership and following, so also do humans.

The Election Code does not stipulate that candidates for delegates must win by a majority of votes cast, but it does stipulate that if a political party has allotted three (3) delegates from each congressional district in accordance with national party regulations, then this must be the case.

Delegates have similar powers to Representatives, including the ability to vote in committee, but they are not permitted to participate in floor votes, which are when the full house determines whether or not to forward a motion.

At whatever level of the delegate selection process (local, state, or national), a person who is seeking selection as a delegate, as specified by state law or party regulation, or who has already been selected as a delegate, is referred to as a delegate.

To know more about Election visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11184657

#SPJ4

Greg won't need to post bail or hand over any property deeds to ensure his attendance; he will be freed on his own recognizance.

"Soft or delicate in texture or consistence; yielding easily to force or pressure; fragile; easily broken, divided, compressed, or wounded," according to the dictionary, describes what tender means. Keats and Fitzgerald appear to be telling us that the night is particularly vulnerable in this way.

This book is a masterpiece from beginning to end, and I've read it numerous times, getting something new out of each reading. It is a tragedy, a romance, and a wellspring of rich, poetic prose.

To know more about bail visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30054626

#SPJ1

The National government has the implied power to undertake actions necessary to carry out its expressly designated powers. This statement is true.

The National government is the highest level of government in a given state, standing above all other municipal and state governments. This level of government is called the national government because of the spread of the nation-state model during the 20th century and the idea that the state derives legitimacy from the nation or people it represents. National governments, whether federal or unitary, generally share a number of structural characteristics.

Various institutions make up national governments and their duties can be categorized as either legislative, executive, or judicial in nature.

Learn more about the National Government here:

https://brainly.com/question/27578672

#SPJ4

The leader of the moderate party can become the prime minister.

In a parliamentary system with a 100-seat unicameral legislature, the leader of the moderate party can indeed become the prime minister. Since no single party has an absolute majority of seats (more than 50%), forming a coalition government becomes necessary. In this scenario, the conservative party holds 45 seats, the moderate party holds 30 seats, and the liberal party holds 25 seats. The leader of the moderate party can negotiate with other parties, particularly the liberal party, to form a coalition government with a combined total of 55 seats. This coalition would have the majority required to support the leader of the moderate party in becoming the prime minister.

Parliamentary systems and coalition governments: In parliamentary systems, the prime minister is typically the leader of the political party or coalition that has the majority of seats in the legislature. However, in cases where no party has an outright majority, coalition governments are formed by multiple parties coming together to secure a majority. This allows smaller parties to play a significant role in the formation and functioning of the government. Coalition governments require negotiation, compromise, and consensus-building among different parties to maintain stability and govern effectively.

Learn more about prime minister

brainly.com/question/20412387

#SPJ11

True,  ADR is typically faster and less expensive than litigation.

ADR refers to Alternative Dispute Resolution, which is a form of dispute resolution that avoids the involvement of a judicial system. It is a mechanism for resolving legal disputes outside of court that has become increasingly common in recent years. It is known to be a faster and less expensive alternative to litigation since it involves the parties coming together and discussing the matter with the help of a neutral third party.In most cases, ADR offers a quicker and less costly solution to disputes than litigation, and it is often more flexible, informal, and less adversarial. In comparison to the formal court system, it also allows greater participation by the parties involved.

Alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") refers to any methods of resolving conflicts outside of court. ADR brings together all methods and procedures for resolving disputes that take place independently of any governing body. Mediation, arbitration, conciliation, negotiation, and transaction are the most well-known ADR techniques.

To know more about Alternative Dispute Resolution :

https://brainly.com/question/16174459

#SPJ11

In general, when you agree to drive, it is assumed that you have agreed to submit to a chemical test if a police officer requests it.

According to the implied consent statute, a motorist must consent to a blood, breath, or urine test if a law enforcement official has reason to suspect they are intoxicated and operating a vehicle.

You are allowed to refuse any test under the implied consent statute, but doing so would result in a one-year license suspension (and maybe a longer suspension under certain conditions), and an officer may be able to force you to do the test in accordance with other laws.

If you refuse to take a blood or breath test when it is requested, your license will automatically be suspended for 12 months for a first offense and for 18 months if you have previously been convicted of DUI or refused testing.

Learn more about implied consent statute: https://brainly.com/question/21364745

#SPJ4

Vote taken by employees to approve or reject the conditions of the union-negotiated contract after collective ratification.

The Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) advises adopting structured interviews, in which applicants are asked the same set of predetermined questions that concentrate on factors that directly affect job performance. By removing arbitrary elements like ability or appearance, this framework helps reduce bias.

Collective bargaining is the process of negotiations between employers and groups of employees with the goal of reaching a settlement to control working conditions, wages, and benefits.

To know more about negotiated  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14974117

#SPJ1

Answer: hello the options related to your question is missing below is the missing option

a. not further a legitimate local interest.

b. not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out-of-state interests.

c. allow only direct, not incidental, regulation of interstate commerce.

d. impose costs on interstate commerce that are more excessive than necessary to bring about the state interests.

answer:

Not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests

( B )

Explanation:

The state statue must not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests,

The commerce clause as enshrined in the constitution during the Tenth amendment does not grant  the power to the states to regulate interstate economic activities without discrimination.  it also serves as a grant power to congress, hence the states where granted powers to regulate interstate commerce

The term for a brief submitted by a person or group that is not a direct party to the case is "amicus curiae." An amicus curiae brief is a legal document that is filed by someone who is not a party to a case.

Amicus briefs are often filed by interest groups, non-governmental organizations, and individuals who have expertise or experience in the subject matter of the case. The purpose of an amicus brief is to provide the court with additional information or arguments that may be relevant to the case, but that have not been raised by the parties to the case.

Amicus briefs are not required by law, but they can be influential in shaping the court's decision. The court may consider the arguments made in an amicus brief when deciding the case, although the weight given to the brief depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the relevance of the arguments made.

See more about amicus curiae at https://brainly.com/question/14452616.

#SPJ11

Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.

Explanation:

Answer:

Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.

Based on the given description, the answer to this is FALSE.

This refers to the standard that is in use by the legislature to find out and discover whether there was a reasonable argument for the enactment of a particular statute.

Hence, we can see that the given description stated that the rational basis test was used to show whether there was a compelling interest for making a statute and this is false.

Read more about the rational basis test here:

https://brainly.com/question/3334211

#SPJ1

Answer:

Specific performance is a type of equitable remedy available in a breach of contract action. It is a remedy based on the concept of fairness. Specific performance recognizes that money may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party in certain situations.

Explanation:

B. Brake suddenly

I think its the answer, otherwise we'll crash

Brake suddenly is the better way, if another driver cuts in front of the person, as it stop the chances of accident.

Excessive speeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, failing to read the signs, being tired, and drinking. Pedestrian: Ignorance, errant crossing, moving on the carriageway, jaywalkers, and carelessness.

Thus, option B is correct.

For more details about major reason of accident on road, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/15113880

#SPJ2

Based on the statement, the jury has decided a civil case involving Mrs. Matthews and Mr. Washburn.

The jury has ruled in favor of Mrs. Matthews and has ordered Mr. Washburn to pay a sum of twenty thousand dollars, along with attorney fees and court costs. The specific details of the case are not provided in the statement, but it appears to be a legal dispute between the two parties resulting in a monetary judgment in favor of Mrs. Matthews.The statement only mentions the ruling in favor of Mrs. Matthews and the monetary amount to be paid by Mr. Washburn. To understand the nature of the case, you would need to provide more information or context surrounding the statement.

Learn more about judgment  here:

 https://brainly.com/question/1396036

#SPJ11

The branch of government that is composed of federally appointed judges is the judicial branch. This branch is responsible for interpreting the law and determining whether actions taken by the other branches of government are constitutional. The answer in B.

The judicial branch is an essential part of the checks and balances system, ensuring that no one branch of government becomes too powerful. Additionally, the judicial branch includes the sources of law branch, which is responsible for reviewing and interpreting statutes, regulations, and legal precedents.

The sources of law branch is crucial for ensuring that laws are applied consistently and fairly throughout the country. Overall, the judicial branch plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law in the United States.The answer is B.

To know more about judicial branch, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1060250#

#SPJ11

A trial court is similar to an appeals court as c. both are judicial bodies and form case law.

An appeals court and a district court are both legal institutions that create case law. The other choices, though, may not apply to both district judges and appeals courts. Trial courts do not always have jurors; some cases may be resolved solely by the judge. The jury system is absent from appeals courts, which only examine the judgements rendered by subordinate courts.

Trial courts typically hear questions of fact and reach preliminary conclusions based on the evidence provided, whereas appeals courts typically concentrate on legal issues and assess the rulings rendered by the lesser court. Trial courts and appeals courts both receive evidence, though the intent and reach of the testimony may vary depending on the court.

Complete Question:

A trial court is similar to an appeals court in what way?

a. both have juries.

b. both hear questions of fact.

c. both are judicial and form case law.

d. both hear testimony.

Read more about trial court on:

https://brainly.com/question/29618636

#SPJ4

Federal district courts have jurisdiction over cases involving citizens of more than one state because the Constitution grants them diversity jurisdiction.

The purpose of diversity jurisdiction is to ensure that out-of-state parties can receive a fair trial in a neutral forum, without any bias or prejudice that might arise in state courts. Additionally, diversity jurisdiction allows for uniformity in the interpretation and application of federal law across different states.

This means that federal courts can hear cases between citizens of different states or between citizens of a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state.

Diversity jurisdiction is also important because it allows parties to choose the forum in which to bring their case. If a party believes that they may not receive a fair trial in state court due to local biases or conflicts of interest, they can seek to have their case heard in federal court.

Read more on federal courts here:https://brainly.com/question/25947870

#SPJ1

Answer:

Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.

Under certain circumstances, it is legally permissible for companies to use force. Here are five situations where it is allowed they are Self-defense, Protecting property, Enforcing laws, Emergencies, and Employee safety.

1. Self-defense: If a company is being attacked or threatened with physical harm, it can use force to defend itself or its employees.

2. Protecting property: A company can use force to protect its property from theft, damage, or destruction.

3. Enforcing laws: Companies that are authorized by law to enforce rules and regulations can use force to ensure compliance. Examples include security guards, police officers, and other law enforcement agencies.

4. Emergencies: In some emergencies, such as natural disasters or public safety crises, companies may use force to maintain order or protect the public.

5. Employee safety: Companies must provide a safe working environment for their employees. If an employee poses a threat to themselves or others, a company may use force to restrain them and prevent harm.

It is important to note that while force may be permissible in these situations, it should always be used as a last resort and in a proportionate manner. Companies should always try to resolve conflicts peacefully and use force only when necessary to protect themselves or others.

Know more about Enforcing laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/28173975

#SPJ11

Answer:

sorry I didn't have the answer ok I needed the points

Answer:

backspace

Explanation:

delete

Answer:

When u wanna delete something

Explanation:

Have a Nice Day

Answer:

Lower Government Spending

Raise Taxes

Answer:

1970s

[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

I think its an Associates degree

Explanation: