Answer:
The Tories were British monarchy supporters or Loyalists. They believed that leading an empire required a strong monarchy. They didn't think America would be able to exist on its own.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Tory ethos has been summed up with the phrase "God, Queen, and Country". Tories are generally monarchists, were historically of a high church Anglican religious heritage, and opposed to the liberalism of the Whig faction. Typically, Tories defend the ideas of hierarchy, natural order, and aristocracy
Typically, Tories defend the ideas of hierarchy, natural order, and aristocracy. The philosophy originates from the Cavalier faction, a royalist group during the English Civil War. The Tories political faction that emerged in 1681 was a reaction to the Whig-controlled Parliaments that succeeded the Cavalier Parliament.
The constitution of the Choctaw tribe did not include
Answer:
Is that a question?
Explanation:
Wkdmmfkekwkdkekwkendme
How might the different groups that migrated have sought to apply this Manifest Destiny to theirindividual circumstances?
The expression "Manifest Destiny," first used in 1845, refers to the belief that God has predestined the United States to spread democracy and capitalism over all of North America.
The theory underpinned American territorial expansion in the 19th century and served as justification for the eviction of Native Americans and other ethnic groups from their homes. As more states were admitted to the Union as a result of the United States' fast growth, the problem of slavery became more pressing and the Civil War eventually broke out.
The idea of "Manifest Destiny" asserted that everything between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans should be a part of the United States and that it was America's destiny to colonize the whole continent.
Learn more about Manifest Destiny here:
https://brainly.com/question/11669373
#SPJ1
Communism was also known as______(politics)
Answer:
I need answer choices...
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT typically part of a lesson?
Question 2 options:
Reading sections of the textbook
Submitting outlines of your notes
Accessing outside resources such as videos
Completing Check Your Learning questions
Answer:
B. Submitting outlines of your notes
Explanation:
Where would the North American migrate too
Answer:
northwestern siberia and Western Alaska
For what purpose(s) are they seceding from the Union?
Answer:
Ever since the formation of the United States of America, the North and the South followed different paths. By the mid 1800s, the differences between the two regions were so pronounced that many observers felt like the country was home to two distinct cultures.
The North was becoming more and more industrial and dedicated to free labor and immigration. Many Northerners committed themselves to chasing the American dream of the poor man working hard, making a home for himself, and perhaps even doing great things. Slavery was not common and even banned in some states, and a growing abolitionist movement frequently demanded freedom for all people. The North was also more inclined to support a strong federal government.
Which of the following is correct of the Republican governments that formed in the South during Reconstruction?
Select one:
a.They were responsible for setting up the first public schools in most Southern states
b.They began the modernization process in the South and attempted to expand the railroad network
c.Each of these is correct regarding the Republican governments that formed during Reconstruction.
d.They helped expand women's rights.
You are answering the question:
Should the President of the United States be elected by the Electoral College (the current process) or should it be changed so that the person with the largest number of popular votes is elected President?
You must include the following to receive full credit:
A description of the current process to elect the President using the Electoral College
A clear statement of your opinion about using the Electoral College to elect the President
2-3 reasons that support your opinion (supporting evidence)
1-2 reasons against your opinion (counterargument)
At least 300 words
If you copy your response directly from the Internet, you will receive no credit for your answer.
An optional writing organizer has been provided for you below. If you use the organizer, make sure your writing is in paragraph form. Do not simply fill out the organizer, as you will not receive any credit.
Optional Government Outline:
Introduction (4-5 sentences)
Hook: start with something to get the reader interested
Background information: a description of the current Electoral College process.
Your personal opinion: state the position you are arguing in your essay.
Reasons that support your opinion (7-10 sentences)
First Reason
State the evidence that supports your opinion
Explain why that supports your point of view
Second Reason
State the evidence that supports your opinion
Explain why that supports your point of view
Third Reason (optional)
State the evidence that supports your opinion
Explain why that supports your point of view
Conclusion Sentence: summarize your reasons again
Reason(s) that oppose your opinion & Conclusion (4-6 sentences)
Opposing Reason
State the evidence that opposes your point of view
Point out a weakness in the evidence
Conclusion
Reinforce your position as the most reasonable point of view
End with a positive note by retelling the ways that we can benefit from your argument
While there are valid arguments both for and against the Electoral College, I believe that it should be maintained as the process to elect the President of the United States. It provides representation for smaller states, promotes stability, and helps maintain a two-party system. However, discussions and potential reforms to address the concerns raised by the popular vote vs. electoral vote discrepancy should be encouraged to ensure a fair and democratic electoral process.
The current process to elect the President of the United States is done through the Electoral College. This means that instead of being directly elected by the popular vote, the President is elected by a group of electors who are chosen by each state. Each state is allocated a certain number of electors based on its representation in Congress, with a total of 538 electors nationwide.
In my opinion, the President of the United States should continue to be elected by the Electoral College for several reasons. Firstly, the Electoral College ensures that the interests of smaller states are not overshadowed by larger states. This is because each state is given a minimum of three electoral votes, regardless of its population size. This system prevents candidates from focusing solely on densely populated areas and neglecting the concerns of rural or less populated regions.
Secondly, the Electoral College promotes stability and prevents hasty decision-making. It serves as a buffer between the popular vote and the final decision, allowing for a more deliberative and thoughtful process. This is especially important during times of crisis or uncertainty, as the Electoral College can act as a safeguard against impulsive or uninformed choices.
Thirdly, the Electoral College encourages a two-party system and helps to maintain political stability. Due to the winner-takes-all nature of most states' electoral votes, third-party candidates face significant challenges in gaining enough electoral support to win. This promotes a more unified and coherent political landscape, which can enhance the effectiveness of governance.
However, it is important to acknowledge the counterarguments against using the Electoral College to elect the President. One main argument is that it can lead to a candidate winning the popular vote but losing the electoral vote, as seen in the 2000 and 2016 elections. This can be seen as a flaw in the system, as it goes against the principle of majority rule.
For more such questions on two-party system, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/26695072
#SPJ8
Congress makes which type of law?
A. common law
B. constitutional law
C. military law
D. statutory law
Answer:
b) constitutional law
Explanation:
helllppppp please and thank you
The music teacher said, "If you tighten the string too much, it will snap. And if you leave it too slack, it won't play." What's the message here for Siddhartha? What can he take away with this idea? (Hint think Buddhist concepts)
Answer:
I believe the message for Siddhartha here is that there should be balance in everything he does.
If he does not find the right balance to what he does, then there will always be problems because if he overdoes it, it will snap, and if does not do it enough, it won't work at all.
Explain how the New Deal both helped and hindered America during the Great Depression.
The New Deal was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939. Major federal programs and agencies included the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), the Civil Works Administration (CWA), the Farm Security Administration (FSA), the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA) and the Social Security Administration (SSA). They provided support for farmers, the unemployed, youth and the elderly.
The New Deal had both positive and negative effects on America during the Great Depression.
Positive effects:
* The New Deal helped to provide relief to millions of Americans who were struggling during the Depression.
* The New Deal helped to create jobs and stimulate the economy.
* The New Deal helped to reform the financial system and protect consumers.
* The New Deal helped to establish important social programs that still benefit Americans today, such as Social Security and Medicare.
Negative effects:
* The New Deal was expensive and some people argued that it was too intrusive in the economy.
* The New Deal led to an increase in government regulation, which some people saw as a threat to individual liberty.
* The New Deal was not enough to end the Depression, and some people argued that it actually prolonged it.
Overall, the New Deal had a mixed impact on America during the Great Depression. It helped to provide relief to many Americans, but it also led to an increase in government regulation and some people argued that it prolonged the Depression.
Here is a more detailed explanation of the positive and negative effects of the New Deal:
Positive effects:
* Relief: The New Deal provided relief to millions of Americans who were struggling during the Depression. This was done through a variety of programs, including the CCC, the CWA, and the FSA. These programs provided jobs, food, and shelter to people who were out of work.
* Recovery: The New Deal also helped to stimulate the economy and create jobs. This was done through programs such as the NIRA, which established codes of fair competition for businesses. These codes helped to stabilize prices and wages, which led to increased production and employment.
* Reform: The New Deal also helped to reform the financial system and protect consumers. This was done through the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial and investment banking, and the Securities Act of 1933, which required companies to disclose financial information to investors.
* Social programs: The New Deal also established important social programs that still benefit Americans today. These include Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance. These programs provide essential support to millions of Americans, and they have helped to reduce poverty and inequality.
Negative effects:
* **Cost:** The New Deal was expensive. The federal government spent billions of dollars on New Deal programs, and this led to a large increase in the national debt.
* Regulation: The New Deal also led to an increase in government regulation. This was done through programs such as the NIRA, which established codes of fair competition for businesses. Some people saw this as a threat to individual liberty.
* Ineffectiveness: The New Deal was not enough to end the Depression. The economy did improve during the 1930s, but it did not fully recover until after World War II. Some people argued that the New Deal actually prolonged the Depression by discouraging investment and innovation.
Conclusion:
The New Deal was a complex and controversial set of programs that had both positive and negative effects on America during the Great Depression. It is still debated today whether the New Deal was a success or a failure. However, there is no doubt that it had a profound impact on the American economy and society.
PLZ ANSWER WILL AWARD BRAINLIEST
What is the best explanation of the importance of the Second Amendment?
People accused of a crime need to be able to speak in their defense.
If people cannot talk about policies, they cannot change them.
People in the military should have the right to vote in elections.
People need to have the ability to protect themselves and their homes.
Answer:
the last one, its the only one referring too guns
Answer:D. People need to have the ability to protect themselves and their homes.
Explanation:
Why was Italy in chaos following WWI?
Returning veterans faced unemployment
Bad economy/high taxes
Many political parties/factions
All of the above
Answer:
D. All of the above
Explanation:
Italy after WW1 had not gained a lot of economical support and territory size despite being on the winning side of the war. The politics was absolutely chaotic and also allowed for radical parties like Mussolini's fascists to rise during the Great Depression. Many veterans after the war did not have the means to obtain employment either.
When did Diane Nash first encounter the degradation (poor treatment) of Jim Crow?
Read this passage from a 1933 speech by U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt: Happiness lies not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort. The joy and moral stimulation of work no longer must be forgotten in the mad chase of [short-term] profits. These dark days will be worth all they cost us if they teach us that our true destiny is not to be ministered unto but to minister to ourselves and to our fellow men.¹ -Franklin D. Roosevelt, Inaugural Address, 1933 What makes this speech a primary source? A. It contains a strong historical argument. B. The words are spoken by the president himself. C. It uses narrative to keep the reader's attention. D. It was written over 70 years in the past.
Answer:
9913565fgjhjhv the answer to your question
Explanation:
joy of achievement
How would the Morrill act and the pacific railway act impact westward movement?
Answer:
Reduced the travel time across the continent from several months to one week
Explanation:
The legislative efforts that resulted in the Pacific Railway Act led to the successful completion of the transcontinental railroad, which reduced the travel time across the continent from several months to one week and is considered one of the greatest technological achievements of the 19th century.
explain 5 ways in which the ancient Greeks contributed to world civilization
The Greeks made important contributions to philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. Literature and theatre was an important aspect of Greek culture and influenced modern drama. The Greeks were known for their sophisticated
sculpture and architecture.
Western Philosophy.
Socrates.
Olympics. The Olympic games first began on the island of “Pelops” in the western Peloponnese in 776 BCE.
Marathon.
Alarm Clock.
Umbrellas.
What is the definition of federalism?
Answer:
Federalism is a process where two or more governments share powers over the same geographic area. Also a system of government.
Explanation:
Hope this Helps!
(I didn't copy this definition. I put it in my own words!)
:)
How did the United States change after the war of 1812?
Answer:
With the end of the War of 1812, the Native Americans could no longer count on Great Britain to shield them from the flood of white settlers headed west. ... In the years after the War of 1812, new states north and south entered the Union. At the same time, America's economic engine was fueled by King Cotton.
Explanation: hope i helped :D
Answer:
Well the history is quite complex but here it is.
Explanation:
With the end of the War of 1812, the Native Americans could no longer count on Great Britain to shield them from the flood of white settlers headed west. ... In the years after the War of 1812, new states north and south entered the Union. At the same time, America's economic engine was fueled by King Cotton.
his is an image of an envelope from the mid-1800s. Study it, then answer the question.
What does this image say about cotton?
Cotton ruled the US economy.
Cotton ruled factory production.
Cotton ruled the Southern economy.
Answer: c.
Explanation:
Brainliest plz
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I need help
A naturalized citizen is not eligible to become
a. Chief justice of the Supreme Court
b. A member of the United States Senate
c. President of the United States
d. Speaker of the House
Explanation: Its a only a us born citizen can become president so easy
Who supported the passage of the indian removal act in 1830?andrew jacksonthomas jeffersonblack hooftecumseh.
Answer:
Explanation:
Andrew Jackson
the Economic and Social differences that existed in Ancient Rome?
Answer:
They didn't have much of a social class, it was more of a dictatorship.
Explanation:
People were technically living in fear. Although there was a small middle class, tyrants were very demanding over everyone else
P.S. Happy Halloween!! Stay safe!
In 1861, Abraham Lincoln mobilized the U.S. military to achieve which goal?
In 1861, Abraham Lincoln mobilized the U.S. military with the goal of preserving the Union and suppressing the secessionist movement by the Confederate states during the American Civil War.
In 1861, Abraham Lincoln, as President of the United States, took the significant step of mobilizing the U.S. military. His primary goal was to preserve the Union and prevent the secession of the Confederate states. The outbreak of the American Civil War, fueled by deep-rooted tensions over slavery and states' rights, posed a direct threat to the unity of the nation. Lincoln's decision to mobilize the military aimed to maintain the territorial integrity of the United States and assert federal authority over the seceding states. The mobilization led to a protracted and devastating conflict that ultimately resolved the question of secession and solidified the authority of the federal government.In conclusion, in 1861, Abraham Lincoln mobilized the U.S. military with the goal of preserving the Union and preventing the secession of the Confederate states during the American Civil War.
For more such questions on American Civil War:
https://brainly.com/question/28968808
#SPJ8
How have American political parties evolved since their
creation and what are the ideologies of modern American political parties?
URGENT
Social media influences business innovation by
increasing the number of people who apply for a job.
allowing businesses to sell similar products worldwide.
allowing new products to be introduced more quickly.
restricting the number of businesses that create new products.
Answer: Social media influences business innovation by allowing new products to be introduced more quickly.
Explanation: Social media has revolutionized the way businesses communicate and interact with their customers. Through social media platforms, businesses can get real-time feedback from customers, identify emerging trends, and respond quickly to changing market demands. This allows businesses to introduce new products more quickly and efficiently, without relying on traditional modes of market research or product testing. Additionally, social media provides businesses with a platform to showcase their innovations and generate buzz around new products, reaching a wider audience than ever before.
Why, do you think, Malenkov compares the US leader to Hitler?
Malenkov's comparison of the US leader to Hitler likely stems from a combination of political motivations and historical parallels.
Malenkov's comparison is likely stems from perceiving authoritarian tendencies or policies in the US leader reminiscent of Hitler's regime.
To provide some context, Georgy Malenkov was a prominent Soviet politician who served as the Chairman of the Council of Ministers (the equivalent of the Prime Minister) in the Soviet Union during the early 1950s.
Comparing the US leader to Hitler could be seen as a rhetorical strategy employed by Malenkov to delegitimize and criticize the policies and actions of the US government. By drawing a parallel to Hitler, who is universally condemned for his authoritarianism, aggression, and human rights abuses, Malenkov is likely attempting to paint the US leader as similarly dangerous and unjust.
Moreover, Malenkov may be leveraging historical events to support his comparison. In the aftermath of World War II, the Soviet Union and the United States emerged as the two superpowers engaged in a Cold War, marked by ideological and geopolitical tensions. The rhetoric of comparing leaders to Hitler was not uncommon during this period, as both sides sought to portray their opponents as the embodiment of evil.
It is important to note that the comparison made by Malenkov should be understood in the context of political rhetoric and propaganda, rather than as a purely objective assessment. Such comparisons can be subjective and reflect the biases and interests of the person making them.
Know more about the political motivations here:
https://brainly.com/question/11740845
#SPJ8
role of women in islam
Answer: Hope this helps :)
Men are providers for women and in exchange for support, women should be obedient and serve their husbands. They should keep their and after marriage, loyalty, chasity and complete dedication to their husbands are wronged for securing maintenance. Women are seen as weak and as easily overpowered by men.
What is the message of this cartoon?
US imperialism is a negative force that should be opposed.
US imperialism allows the nation to use diplomacy in certain situations.
US imperialism is helping the nation grow quickly.
US imperialism leads the nation to fight unnecessary wars.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Correct on edge 2020
Answer:
the answer is C, US imperialism is helping the nation grow quickly.
Explanation:
100pts
PROJECT: VOTING ISSUES
Ideally, voting in the U.S. is a simple process. You choose a candidate, go to a polling station, and cast a vote. Yet, where you go to vote is actually a very complicated process. The U.S. is divided into electoral districts. These districts determine the number of representatives each state has in the House of Representatives and are based on population. To further complicate matters, each state is divided into districts for purposes of electing state legislators. Finally, cities are divided into districts for purposes of electing city and town council members.
Disputes over district boundaries occur all the time at every level of government. As suburban and urban areas grow, their citizens want more representation. Furthermore, population shifts affect the demographics of an area and can cause a shift in voting patterns.
Today, you will be analyzing the voting patterns of a specific geographic area over the past twenty-five years to get a better sense of how population affects voting.
OBJECTIVES
Identify shifts in voting patterns in a specific region of the country.
Analyze voting patterns in a specific geographical area over the past twenty-five years.
Make inferences about why shifts in voting patterns occurred in a specific geographical area.
Understand the government’s role in shifting voting patterns.
Before You Begin
Before you begin, let’s take a look at how population affects voting patterns in the U.S.
Population and Districting
First, population plays a significant role in representation at the local, state, and national levels. Electoral districts determine the number of representatives a state has in both the national and state legislatures. Districting also determines city council positions.
Compare the two maps below.
What do you notice about the difference in districting? New York has a larger number of districts than North Dakota because it has a larger population. Therefore, New York has more representatives in the House of Representatives than North Dakota.
Changing populations means that these district boundaries are continually being challenged. The government at the local, state, and national levels can use redistricting to get more representatives in Congress. Political parties try to take advantage of redistricting, too—shifting boundaries to get representatives for their specific parties.
In 1962, a landmark districting case came before the Supreme Court. In Baker v. Carr, citizens were suing the state of Tennessee over districting. State districts had not been altered since 1901. Cities and suburban areas had grown substantially since then, yet their representation in the local legislature did not reflect that change. Rural areas (which voted more conservatively) still had more representatives. The case went before the Supreme Court, which ruled that the state was violating the Fourteenth Amendment in its districting polices. The Court mandated that the state of Tennessee could conduct no further elections until redistricting took place. Critics of the ruling argued that the Supreme Court had no power to issue such a ruling because it had no jurisdiction in the matter. Regardless, the ruling stood.
Population and Voting
Notice the shift in voting pattern in the southern tips of Texas and Florida. One possibility for that shift could be the increasing population of Hispanic-Americans in those regions who tend to vote Democratic more than Republican.
Directions
Today, you will evaluate a specific geographic area of the country to see how voting patterns have changed over the past 25 years. You will write a reflection paper describing these changes and evaluating the possible influences that have led to these changes. Be sure to study both shifts in voting patterns and shifts in redistricting patters as you work to form a conclusion.
Choose a geographic area to study. This can be a state, a specific region within a state, or a specific region of the country (such as the Sunbelt).
Identify shifts in both voting patterns and districting boundaries for that region over the past 25 years.
Hypothesize reasons for shifts in both voting patterns and districting boundaries.
Write a reflection paper describing the shifts and evaluating their causes.
Prompt
In the space provided, write a 400 to 500-word reflection paper describing shifts in voting patterns and districting boundaries for a specific geographic area over the past 25 years. Include an evaluation of the causes for these voting shifts and districting boundaries.
The above prompt has to the with the history of voting Issues in the US.
What are the voting issues that has been experienced in the US?
Over the past 25 years, the state of Texas has experienced significant shifts in both voting patterns and districting boundaries. These changes have been influenced by a number of factors, including population growth, demographic changes, and political maneuvering.
One of the most significant shifts in voting patterns in Texas has been the increasing support for the Democratic Party in traditionally Republican areas of the state. This trend can be attributed in part to the changing demographics of the state, particularly the increasing number of Hispanic-Americans. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the Hispanic population in Texas has grown from 25% in 1990 to 39% in 2020. This demographic shift has been particularly pronounced in urban areas such as Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio. As the Hispanic population has grown, so too has the political power of this group. In recent years, Democrats have been able to win over Hispanic voters by emphasizing issues such as immigration reform, healthcare, and education.
Another factor that has influenced shifts in voting patterns in Texas is political maneuvering, particularly with regard to redistricting. In 2003, Texas Republicans redrew the state's congressional districts in an effort to gain more seats in Congress. This controversial move, which was engineered by then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, resulted in a number of legal challenges and eventually led to a Supreme Court ruling that upheld the redistricting but found that the state had violated the Voting Rights Act in the process.
Changes in districting boundaries have also played a role in the shifting political landscape of Texas. In recent years, there has been a trend towards creating "majority-minority" districts, in which minority voters make up a majority of the population. These districts have been created in an effort to ensure that minority voters are adequately represented in the political process. However, critics argue that these districts are often drawn in a way that dilutes the voting power of minority voters by spreading them out across several districts.
In conclusion, the past 25 years have seen significant shifts in both voting patterns and districting boundaries in Texas. These changes have been influenced by a variety of factors, including population growth, demographic changes, and political maneuvering. As Texas continues to evolve, it will be important to monitor these trends and evaluate their impact on the state's political landscape.
Learn more about voting at:
https://brainly.com/question/3795028
#SPJ1