Answer:
the want for religious freedom led to the discovery of the new world
Explanation:
Christianity was getting suppressed causing those with that religious belief to go elsewhere in search for religious freedom
Which best describes a result of the legal reforms of Süleyman, the Ottoman
emperor?
Non-Muslims could practice their religion if they paid a tax
Pirates received government funding to raid neighboring civilizations
Women were accepted into universities
All religious freedoms ended
Non-Muslims could practice their religion if they paid a tax.
Who was Suleyman, the Ottoman emperor?
Sultan of the Ottoman Empire from 1520 until 1566 was Süleyman the Magnificent, often known as Süleyman I or the Lawgiver. In the areas of law, literature, art, and architecture, he oversaw the creation of some of what are today recognized as the most iconic masterpieces of Ottoman civilization.
Sultan Selim I only had one son, Suleyman, who was born between November 1494 and April 1495 and passed sometime on September 5 or 6, 15 in Szigetvár, Hungary. He served as the sancak beyi (governor) of Kaffa and Manisa, respectively, under the rule of his grandfathers Selim I in western Asia Minor and Bayezid II in the Crimea.
to learn more about Suleyman click:
https://brainly.com/question/11932618
#SPJ4
NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE TAKING THE TEST RIGHT!!
Which statement best describes the content of Article VII of the Constitution?
It describes the purpose of the Constitution.
It focuses on the ratification of the Constitution.
It establishes procedures for the executive branch.
It explains how changes can be made to the Constitution.
Answer: It focuses on the ratification of the Constitution.
Explanation:
What did many Americans colonist use Thomas Paine's Common sense to justify?
2) George Washington warned America to stay
or alliances will lead to conflicts and wars which can ruin a country.
because taking sides
O Impartial
O Nonpartisan
O Anodyne
ONeutral
Answer:
netural
Explanation:
because that what he would
The Second Bank of the United States Group of answer choices was disbanded in 1811 when its charter was not renewed. had its charter renewal vetoed in 1832. is considered to be the primary cause of the bank panic of 1907. None of these.
None of these options accurately describes the fate of the Second Bank of the United States.
The Second Bank of the United States was disbanded in 1811 when its charter was not renewed.
The Second Bank of the United States was established in 1816 as a central banking institution with the goal of stabilizing the nation's economy. However, its existence was met with controversy and opposition from various political factions. When its original charter expired in 1811, it was not renewed by the U.S. Congress, leading to its dissolution.
The decision not to renew the charter was primarily influenced by a belief that the bank held too much power and was seen as favoring wealthy individuals and business interests. Opponents of the bank, led by President Andrew Jackson, argued that it violated principles of limited government and believed in the importance of state sovereignty in banking matters.
The dissolution of the Second Bank of the United States had significant implications for the country's financial system. It resulted in the fragmentation of the banking industry, with state-chartered banks gaining more prominence and influence. This period was marked by a lack of centralized control over monetary policy and led to increased economic instability, including financial panics and recessions.
To know more about Second Bank of the United States refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30414144?#
#SPJ11
what War with a confederacy of Native Americans due to the lack of conciliatory relations between the British and the native peoples following the French & Indian War.
1. Escriba 4 diferencias de cada uno de los contratos de OBRA DE LABOR y contrato CIVIL O POR PRESTACION DE SERVICIOS.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Aunque no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder a la pregunta, podemos comentar lo siguiente. Tampoco especificas a qué país te refieres, porque en los países Latinoamericanos los términos son similares, aunque cada uno tiene sus diferencias.
Por lo anterior, y sin conocer el país en donde vives, ,podemos comentarte lo siguiente por medio de conceptos generales.
Las diferencias entre los contratos de obra de labor o contrato de trabajo formal, comparado con el contrato por prestación de servicios, son las siguientes.
Cuando hablamos del contratos de obra de labor o contrato de trabajo formal, se trata de la contratación que realiza la empresa contemplando todos los derechos y obligaciones que marca la ley en materia de trabajo.
Aquí, el empleado tiene que cumplir un trabajo en específico con una serie de características de acuerdo a la función y el puesto por el que haya sido contratado. El empleado debe cumplir un horario específico y cumplir con objetivos claros dentro de la empresa.
La empresa por su parte, está obligada a otorgarle al empleado las prestaciones básicas que marca la ley, como pueden ser el pago puntual de su salario por quincena o por mes, tener un fondo de pensiones vigente, estar inscrito en el sistema de seguridad social y hospitalaria que marca la legislación vigente, días de vacaciones, entre otras, según cada país.
Ahora, con respecto a al contrato prestación de servicios, el empleado no está contratado como parte de la empresa. Es decir, no es parte de la nómina oficial, y por esa razón, no recibe los servicios anteriormente mencionados en el caso del empleado formal.
El trabajador es contratado para trabajar de manera autónoma, sólo por la prestaciones de los servicios acreditados. Al trabajador se le contrata para que preste sus servicios de manera temporal, y cuando termina, sencillamente deja de trabajar sin ninguna obligación laboral por parte de la empresa.
El dinero que recibe de la empresa por la prestación de sus servicios no se llama salario, sino honorario por servicios.
Name 2 anti-Semitic tropes
pls hurry i need this soon tyyy
Answer:
the blood libel and the clannishness charge
Explanation:
hich of the following statements best describes the journey westward in the mid-1800s? it was extremely slowgoing, but the trails were easy to cross. it took a long time and included a number of difficult obstacles. it took a short time but included a multitude of challenges. the obstacles were so difficult that few pioneers
The journey westward in the mid-1800s was a long and challenging one, full of obstacles and difficulties.
Pioneers faced numerous challenges along the way, such as harsh weather conditions, rugged terrain, and dangerous river crossings. Despite these obstacles, many persevered and made the journey successfully, often taking several months to reach their destination. "It took a long time and included a number of difficult obstacles." This journey was indeed challenging, with pioneers facing various obstacles and challenges along the way. We are aware that the westward exodus was hazardous; mishaps, injuries, and illnesses were frequent. Native Americans were confronted by the pioneers, many of whom were unfriendly. The weather was erratic, and the terrain was hazardous. Overall, the journey could be gruesome and lethal.
To know more about pioneers refer :
brainly.com/question/14398898
#SPJ11
What is the political cartoon suggesting about the U.S. Senate and the power of big business in government?
Answer: The cartoon is stating that big business has granted power over the U.S Senate. The cartoon further states that big businesses hold an important role for the economy’s benefit. Furthermore, it shows that the community does not play a role as they don’t have upheld power.
Explanation:
The cartoon is expressing that huge business has conceded control over the U.S Senate. The cartoon further expresses that huge organizations hold a significant job for the economy's advantage.
What is political cartoon?Political cartoon, a drawing (frequently including exaggeration) made to convey publication critique on governmental issues, lawmakers, and recent developments.
Such cartoons assume a part in the political talk of a general public that accommodates the right to speak freely of discourse and of the press. They are a fundamentally assessment situated medium and can commonly be tracked down on the publication pages of papers and other editorial outlets, whether on paper or electronic structure.
Their topic is normally that of current and newsworthy political issues, and, for them to be perceived, they expect that pursuer have some fundamental foundation information about their topic, preferably that given by the medium where they are distributed.
A political cartoon is likewise an imaginative vehicle described by both figurative and humorous language. It might bring up the specific circumstances, issues.
Therefore political cartoons can support the course of assessment development and direction.
Learn more about political cartoons here:
brainly.com/question/1545458
#SPJ2
Which type of evidence is an example of testimony ?
Answer:
Testimonial evidence is a statement made under oath. An example would be a witness pointing to someone in the courtroom and saying, “That's the guy I saw robbing the grocery store.” This is also called direct evidence or prima facie evidence. Physical evidence can be any object or material relevant in a crime.
Which of the following best describes the events that took place
after the failed rebellion at Harper's Ferry?
Select all that apply.
A-Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas condemned the violence
B-more and more Southerns saw leaving the Union as their only
option to maintain slavery
C-prominent Southerners started to have discussions about abolishing slavery
D-abolitionists viewed Brown as a martyr and rang church bells
after his execution
Answer:
A, B, D
Explanation:
After the rebellion at Harper's Ferry, it was decided that it was necessary to establish a repudiation of violence, Brown was seen as a martyr and many southerners began to think that the only way to maintain slavery was to separate the southern states from the union.
With that, we can affirm that options A, B, and D are the correct answers.
We can reach this conclusion because:
The rebellion at Harper's Ferry took place in 1859.This rebellion was established by John Brown and some abolitionists.They moved to the southern states, willing to fight for the liberation of slaves.They were tired of the southern farmers' refusal to end slavery.They attacked the farms and ranchers with a lot of violence, to the point where they made this event one of the starting points of the Civil War.Many people died in the rebellion, both abolitionists and southerners.Brown was arrested and sentenced to death.Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas abhorred this event and recognized that the problems between Northerners and Southerners should not be resolved in this way. Southerners saw remaining in the union as dangerous and many Northerners and abolitionists supported Brown's attitude by making him a martyr.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/22895645?referrer=searchResults
Write a speech in which you try to convince your audience to either accept or reject or reject the new constitution
Speech to convince your audience to either accept or reject or reject the new constitution.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Today, I stand before you to address a matter of utmost importance that will shape the future of our nation. We find ourselves at a crossroads, where we must decide whether to accept or reject the proposed new constitution. This document holds the power to redefine our governance and impact our lives for generations to come. It is our duty as responsible citizens to carefully consider its implications and make a choice that best serves the interests of our nation.
Those who advocate for accepting the new constitution argue that it brings necessary changes to address the shortcomings of our current system. They argue that it provides a more robust framework for governing, with clear separation of powers, stronger checks and balances, and increased accountability. They emphasize that it aims to protect individual rights and liberties, fostering an inclusive society where every citizen has equal opportunities.
On the other hand, those who urge us to reject the new constitution believe that it undermines the principles upon which our nation was founded. They claim that it concentrates power in the hands of a few, diminishing the voice of the people. They fear that the proposed changes will erode the sovereignty of our states and infringe upon our individual liberties. They argue that we should preserve the integrity of our current system, which has served us well for so many years.
It is essential to consider both perspectives and weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks. We must envision the kind of nation we aspire to be and assess whether the proposed constitution aligns with our collective vision. We must reflect upon the values that have guided us thus far and examine whether the new constitution upholds and strengthens these principles.
Moreover, we should engage in open and constructive dialogue, fostering a spirit of unity and collaboration. Let us listen to one another's concerns and aspirations, allowing diverse voices to contribute to this vital decision. By doing so, we can reach a consensus that reflects the will of the people and ensures a better future for our nation.
It is important to remember that the decision to accept or reject the new constitution is not a simple one. It requires careful consideration, informed judgment, and a deep understanding of the potential consequences. Our choice will shape the course of our nation and impact the lives of every citizen. Let us exercise our civic duty with prudence, responsibility, and a commitment to the greater good.
In conclusion, the decision to accept or reject the new constitution rests in our hands. We must approach this decision with an open mind, weighing the arguments presented, and considering the long-term implications. Let us engage in respectful and meaningful discourse, guided by our shared values and aspirations. Together, we can make a choice that paves the way for a stronger, more prosperous, and inclusive nation.
Learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ11
Why did Elie keep running during the Death March instead of giving up?
Elie kept running during the Death March because he was determined to survive.
He had seen and experienced too much evil to give up, and he refused to let the Nazis have the satisfaction of taking his life. He was also motivated by a strong sense of hope and faith that he would eventually make it to freedom.
Throughout the march, Elie focused on his desire to stay alive, taking comfort in his own inner strength and belief that he could make it. He was also driven by a desire to tell the world about the atrocities he had seen, and to ensure that no one would ever forget them.
To know more about Death March , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9971411
#SPJ4
what groups in the north opposed the emancipation proclamation
The Confederate leaders and the Northern democrats opposed the emancipation proclamation.
What is the Emancipation proclamation?On January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. According to the proclamation, "all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforth shall be free."
During the effort to abolish slavery, Americans were divided into two groups: those who were anti-slavery (mostly supporters of the Republican Party led by Abraham Lincoln) and those who were pro-slavery (which predominantly supporters of the Democratic party at the time).
Both of these groups can be found in both northern and southern states. Democrats in northern states are almost certainly pro-slavery because of their party's principles. Confederate leaders are those who benefit directly from slavery.
Therefore, the groups are Confederate leaders and the Northern democrats.
To learn more about Emancipation proclamation, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29788953
#SPJ1
Read the paragraph that Deepak wrote to explain how he used a checklist to revise his paper. I checked my transitions to make sure they made sense. I also reread my sentences to determine whether they were too similar in style and length. I fixed a couple to add variety. I found one or two words that needed extended definitions and added them. I made sure that I summarized all research evidence throughout the paper. Besides the revisions listed in the paragraph, what else can Deepak do to strengthen his paper? He should try to keep all of his sentences the same length. He should use more than one technique to integrate his evidence. He should make sure he has a transition for every sentence in the paper. He should avoid extended definitions that provide too much information.
Deepak do to strengthen his paper to integrate his evidence, he should employ a variety of methods.
What does the following paragraph mean to you?The revising strategies employed by Deepak in a work are discussed in the paragraph up top. These strategies ensure that the attempted paper is error-free and compelling enough for the examiner to read.
He shouldn't employ just one method in order to improve the revision list and ensure the quality of the article. The evidence should be presented using a variety of approaches so that it is enjoyable to read and the monotony of only using one method to provide the information is broken.
To know more about evidence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a domestic influence on foreign-policy
Explanation:
This content was originally written for an undergraduate or Master's program. It is published as part of our mission to showcase peer-leading papers written by students during their studies. This work can be used for background reading and research, but should not be cited as an expert source or used in place of scholarly articles/books.
Foreign Policy includes all interactions of individual nation – states with other states. In the wake of globalization, in the 21st century it is particularly important, owing to the interdependence of states. With the advent of international society and globalization implications of foreign policy for each nation-state are far greater. The study of Foreign Policy therefore has become ever more critical and important. The study of Foreign Policy is not limited to any particular school of social science but is a relevant subject for all. In International Relations this study is particularly important as foreign policies form the base for international interactions between individual states.
Primis Player Placeholder
In the 21st century, decisions by one state affect more than just the participating countries. Scholars as well as well policy analysts and even the general public, have a greater desire to understand foreign policy decisions and what motivates the head of government in his foreign policy decision making. Scholarly research on leadership and foreign policy decision making show a far more sophisticated and complex view of the issue than most of the simplistic views seen in the popular press. The popular press prefers pointing finger at the executor of foreign policy decisions as it is easier to blame one person than a group or a system. However scholarly research uncovers the motivations behind foreign policy decision taken by the executor or in better words head of a government.
Answer:
Explanation:
The United States loses a key alliance with another nation.
logically justify that an individual is essentially of biological creature
Answer:
that's using brain not briank
Explanation:
ofc its help
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968) .three conditions for civil disobedience:
1) law of conscience trumps unjust law 2) law is broken openly & lovingly 3) accept the consequences (punishment)
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. outlined three conditions for civil disobedience, which are as follows:
1). Law of conscience trumps unjust law: Dr. King argued that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. A just law is a law that aligns with the moral law or the law of God. On the other hand, an unjust law is a law that goes against moral principles. According to Dr. King, individuals have a moral duty to obey just laws, but they also have a responsibility to disobey unjust laws. By prioritizing the law of conscience over unjust laws, individuals can challenge and work towards changing those laws that perpetuate injustice and inequality.
2). Law is broken openly and lovingly: Dr. King believed that civil disobedience should be conducted openly and lovingly. Openness refers to the public nature of the act of disobedience, allowing others to witness and understand the reasons behind the protest. By openly breaking the unjust law, individuals aim to create awareness and generate public discourse about the injustices being protested. Additionally, civil disobedience should be carried out with love and compassion, without harboring hatred or bitterness towards those enforcing the law. This approach is essential for maintaining nonviolence and fostering a sense of unity among all involved.
3). Accept the consequences (punishment): Dr. King emphasized that those engaging in civil disobedience must be willing to accept the consequences of their actions. This includes being prepared to face punishment, such as imprisonment or fines. By accepting the consequences, individuals demonstrate their commitment and the strength of their convictions. This willingness to endure punishment serves as a powerful statement against the unjust system and showcases the integrity and moral courage of those involved in the protest.
These three conditions for civil disobedience, as laid out by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., provide a framework for individuals seeking to challenge unjust laws or policies through peaceful means. By adhering to these conditions, individuals can effectively bring attention to social injustices, inspire collective action, and work towards positive societal change while upholding principles of nonviolence and justice.
Civil disobedience and unjust law https://brainly.com/question/342503
#SPJ11
In the context above statement, evaluate the impact of pseudoscientific ldeas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946 (Background)
Answer: During the period of 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany, led by Adolf Hitler, implemented a systematic genocide of the Jewish people, known as the Holocaust. The ideology behind this genocide was rooted in the pseudoscientific ideas of race, which were used to justify the persecution and extermination of the Jewish people.
The Nazi regime viewed Jews as a separate and inferior race and used these pseudoscientific ideas to promote the notion of a "master race" of Aryans. They believed that Jews were responsible for many of the world's problems and were a threat to the purity of the Aryan race. These ideas were propagated through propaganda, including posters, speeches, and publications, which promoted anti-Semitic beliefs and attitudes.
As a result of these pseudoscientific ideas, the Jewish people were subjected to discrimination, persecution, and ultimately, genocide. Beginning in 1933, Jews were stripped of their rights and freedoms, including their citizenship, and were forced to wear identifying marks such as the yellow Star of David. They were subjected to pogroms, forced labor, and mass deportations to concentration and extermination camps, where millions of Jews were murdered.
The impact of these pseudoscientific ideas on the Jewish nation was devastating. The Holocaust resulted in the deaths of six million Jews, representing approximately two-thirds of the Jewish population of Europe at that time. The Jewish people were traumatized and displaced, and many survivors were left with physical and emotional scars that lasted a lifetime.
Furthermore, the Holocaust had a profound impact on the Jewish community worldwide, leading to a renewed commitment to Jewish identity and a sense of collective responsibility for the Jewish people. The establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 was a direct response to the Holocaust and the need for a homeland for the Jewish people.
In conclusion, the pseudoscientific ideas of race that were propagated by Nazi Germany during the period of 1933 to 1945 had a devastating impact on the Jewish nation. The Holocaust resulted in the deaths of millions of Jews and had a profound impact on the Jewish community worldwide. It serves as a reminder of the dangers of pseudoscientific ideas and the importance of combating hate and discrimination.
Explanation:
This is an article by Will Irwin, a correspondent for the New York Tribune. Irwin wrote this piece in April 1915, while reporting from the western front. At the time, the United States had declared neutrality in the war.
Boulogne, April 25. – The gaseous vapor which the Germans used against the French divisions near Ypres last Thursday, contrary to the rules of The Hague Convention, introduces a new element into warfare. The attack of last Thursday evening was preceded by the rising of a cloud of vapor, greenish gray and iridescent. That vapor settled to the ground like a swamp mist and drifted toward the French trenches on a brisk wind. Its effect on the French was a violent nausea and faintness, followed by an utter collapse. It is believed that the Germans, who charged in behind the vapor, met no resistance at all, the French at their front being virtually paralyzed. . . .
The effect of the noxious trench gas seems to be slow in wearing away. The men come out of their nausea in a state of utter collapse. Some of the rescued have already died from the aftereffects. How many of the men left unconscious in the trenches when the French broke died from the fumes it is impossible to say, since those trenches were at once occupied by the Germans.
–Will Irwin, 1915
What were the effects of the poison gas, according to the reporter?
- The German troops became too weak to defeat the French.
- Soldiers suffered from nausea, passed out, and even died from the effects.
- There were few effects from the gas, and the battle continued.
- The gas was bright yellow and caused the soldiers’ skin to blister.
Answer:
Soldiers suffered from nausea, passed out, and even died from the effects.
Explanation:
how did the supreme court ruling in citizens United v. FFC affect campaign funding and spending?
Answer: On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Citizens United v. ... The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court's ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions
Explanation: hope this helps
In contrast to the Roman Empire, the process of empire formation in China
A) depended less on military force.
B) had precedents to follow.
C) created a new religious tradition.
D) took centuries to complete.
The correct option is (d).
In contrast to the Roman Empire, the process of empire formation in China took centuries to complete.
While the Roman Empire relied heavily on military conquest and expansion to establish and maintain its empire, China's process of empire formation had different characteristics. The unification and consolidation of China took place over an extended period and involved a combination of military campaigns, political maneuvering, cultural assimilation, and administrative centralization.
Option A, which suggests that China's empire formation depended less on military force, is not entirely accurate. Military force did play a significant role in China's expansion, particularly during the Warring States period and the subsequent unification under the Qin Dynasty. However, the Chinese empire's longevity and stability were also influenced by other factors beyond military conquest.
Option B, the existence of precedents to follow, is more accurate. China had a rich history and a long-standing tradition of centralized governance and imperial rule. Dynasties such as the Qin, Han, Tang, and Ming drew upon previous models of governance and administration, incorporating and building upon existing structures and institutions.
Option C, the creation of a new religious tradition, is incorrect. China's empire formation did not involve the establishment of a new religious tradition. Instead, it was characterized by the interaction and assimilation of various religious and philosophical traditions, such as Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism, into the cultural and social fabric of the empire.
In summary, the process of empire formation in China took centuries to complete, involved military campaigns as well as other factors, and drew upon existing precedents in governance and administration.
Learn more about Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/29587302
#SPJ11
according to pericles, what are two characteristics of a democracy?
Answer:
equal to justice and and open to anyone according to abilitie
Explanation:
which means everyone neither rich or poor but are all equal die to law and rights
Did the Homestead Act successfully help the poor?
The map shows medieval Europe. The Vikings Map of Viking invasion routes in 800 C E. Purple arrows lead from Scandinavia to different parts of Britain and mainland Europe into Russia. Cities of London, Kiev, Paris, Tours, and Rome are labeled. The Magyars and Muslims Map of Magyar and Muslim invasion routes in 800 C E. Green arrows lead from a shaded green area in the Middle East to different parts of Europe including France and Italy. The cities of Kiev, London, Paris, Tours, and Rome are labeled. What does the map tell you about a difference between strategies of the Magyars and the Vikings
Answer:
it's D... The Magyars preferred to invade by land.
Explanation:
Got it right on Edge 2021 :)
jimmie rodgers's performance style was noted for his trademark
Jimmie Rodgers's performance style was noted for his trademark yodel.
One of the greatest and most influential country music performers of all time is Jimmie Rodgers. His distinctive yodel and distinctive performance style made him stand out. Rodgers was a talented guitarist, and a big part of what made him so appealing was the way he played. He was renowned for his ability to portray strong emotions via his music, and his recordings were unpolished and emotional. He was skilled at playing a number of instruments, even though he didn't use an autoharp, and his music was distinguished by its directness and sincerity. His influence on country music is tremendous, and his legacy continues to serve as an inspiration for innumerable singers today.
To know more about Jimmie Rodgers
https://brainly.com/question/31852124
#SPJ11
who is regarded as one of the greatest inventors in history?
Answer:
Thales of Miletus
Leonardo da Vinci
Thomas Edison
Benjamin Franklin.e.t.c
Answer:
Thomas Edison
Explanation:
one of history greatest inventor ..
he credited light bulb,the pphonograph ,motion picture camera
How did Texans win their independence from Mexico?
A) by winning most of the battles against Mexican troops
B) by capturing Santa Anna and forcing him to sign a treaty
C) by winning the Battle of Goliad
D) by turning their group of volunteer fighters into an effective army
He is considered the spiritual leader of Christianity
Answer:
Jesus
Explanation:
Jesus was the only son of God, born to human parents. Carpenter turned to preacher and teacher. Enemy of the church/synagogue. Performed miracles (cure the blind, raise the dead, multiply fishes and bread to feed thousands). Took the burden of man's sin and killed by the Jews. Rise from the dead and ascend into the heavens both body and soul.