At the conclusion of World War I, the Allies launched a series of assaults known as the Hundred Days Offensive.
What is the Hundred Days?In American history, the "Hundred Days" refers to the first part of Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration (March 9–June 16, 1933), when much of the New Deal legislation was passed.At the conclusion of World War I, the Allies launched a series of assaults known as the Hundred Days Offensive. The German Army was defeated as a result of the Offensive, which began on August 8 and ended with the Armistice on November 11. The war's German onslaught had come to an end by the summer of 1918.The Battle of Amiens on 8 August 1918 and the Armistice on 11 November 1918 marked the beginning and end of the Hundred Days Offensive, which in actuality lasted 95 days.To learn more about Hundred Days refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/16695
#SPJ4
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
The assessment against a defendant of the full loss suffered by a plaintiff regardless of the extent to which other parties shared in the wrongdoing is called:
Answer:
Joint and several liability.Explanation:
The joint and several liability establishes that assessment would be conducted against a defendant of all the losses or damages despite of the plaintiff's share of the liability/wrongdoing. In joint and several liability, two or more parties share the responsibility of the lawsuit. Every party is liable to the repayment of the total damage and the plaintiff may collect the damage repayment from any or all of them.How does the law provide protection and justice for individuals
Answer:
The relationship between law and justice is unbreakable and there is a direct relationship between the two. It is also highly believed that they are two faces of a coin. And many people consider the proper implementation of laws as a justice. However, all laws are not just laws and entitle rights to all human beings.
(0)
Which of the following is not administrative authority?
Treasury regulations
Revenue procedures
The Internal Revenue Code
Revenue rulings
The Internal Revenue Code is not administrative authority. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is a federal statutory law of the United States, passed by the United States Congress.
It provides the legal basis for the establishment of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).IRS authority comes from four sources: statutory law (such as the Internal Revenue Code), regulatory law (such as Treasury Regulations), administrative pronouncements (such as Revenue Rulings), and judicial decisions (such as tax court cases).However, the Internal Revenue Code is not considered an administrative authority. The IRS is not authorized to make changes or exceptions to the provisions in the Code. Instead, the Code outlines the fundamental principles that the IRS must follow when administering tax law.Administrative authority is the power granted to administrative agencies by legislation to carry out the purposes of the law. The Internal Revenue Service is an administrative agency of the federal government, responsible for enforcing tax law. To fulfill its duties, the IRS relies on four sources of authority: statutory law, regulatory law, administrative pronouncements, and judicial decisions. Treasury Regulations, Revenue Procedures, and Revenue Rulings are all examples of administrative pronouncements.Treasury Regulations are rules and guidelines established by the Secretary of the Treasury under the authority of the Internal Revenue Code. They interpret the provisions of the IRC and provide guidance to taxpayers on how to comply with tax law. Revenue Procedures provide guidance to IRS personnel and taxpayers on how to handle specific situations, such as how to request a private letter ruling from the IRS. Revenue Rulings provide official IRS interpretations of the IRC and explain how tax law applies to specific situations. In contrast, the Internal Revenue Code is not considered administrative authority. It is a federal statutory law passed by Congress, and it provides the legal basis for the establishment of the IRS. However, it does not authorize the IRS to make changes or exceptions to its provisions.In conclusion, the Internal Revenue Code is not administrative authority. It is a federal statutory law passed by Congress, and it provides the legal basis for the establishment of the IRS. The IRS relies on four sources of authority to fulfill its duties: statutory law, regulatory law, administrative pronouncements, and judicial decisions. Treasury Regulations, Revenue Procedures, and Revenue Rulings are all examples of administrative pronouncements.
To Know More about authorize visit:
brainly.com/question/1255536
#SPJ11
The heir of a large estate will be of legal age within 30 days. He lists for sale with a broker one of the properties held by the estate. The broker knows of a buyer for the property and sells it within 24 hours of listing, with closing to be in 45 days. The listing and sales agreement are
fulfilled, executed, voidable or executory??
Based on the given scenario, the listing and sales agreement can be considered executed. This is because the broker was able to find a buyer for the property within 24 hours of listing it for sale, and the heir has agreed to sell the property.
The terms of the agreement have been established, including the closing date which is 45 days from the date of sale. However, it is important to note that the agreement may also be considered executory since the closing date is still in the future and the buyer has not yet taken possession of the property. This means that both parties have obligations that need to be fulfilled before the agreement can be fully executed. It is not considered voidable as both parties have agreed to the terms and conditions of the agreement, and there is no indication that any fraudulent or illegal actions were taken during the transaction.
To know more about buyers
https://brainly.com/question/906651
#SPJ11
in appeals cases lawyers for both sides appear before a panel of judges to argue about the law applicable to the vase
Trial evidence is not heard by appeals courts, in contrast to trial courts. As a result, witnesses do not testify at appeals. Instead, attorneys on both sides dispute the law that governs the case in front of a panel of judges.
An appeal is a procedure used in law where parties ask for a formal revision of an official decision and cases are examined by a higher authority. The purpose of appeals is to clarify and interpret the law as well as to correct errors that have been made. Despite the fact that appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law nations did not adopt an affirmative right to appeal until the 19th century.
For many centuries, there have been appellate courts and various systems of error rectification. Hammurabi and his governors served as the nation's highest appellate courts during the first dynasty of Babylon. The Valerian and Porcine laws, which date back to 509 BC, recognized the appeals process.
To know more about appeal click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8643122
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
In appeals cases lawyers for both sides appear before a panel of judges to argue about the law applicable to the vase. Explain how appeals and appellate processes differ from trials and trial processes.
Describe at least 3 powers that are reserved for the National government. Describe at least 3 powers reserved for State governments. Describe at least 3 powers shared between the National and State governments. Who do you think has more power, the national or state governments, and why?
Answer:
national powers: coining money, making laws, explaining laws
state powers: minimum wage, opening schools, establishing businesses
national probably has more power because they can make and establish laws, plus they are the ones who gave the states the power
Explanation:
Question 2 (1 point)
Which of the following statements about malicious prosecution is true?
All U.S. courts permit a suit for wrongful civil proceedings.
The criminal proceeding must terminate in the plaintiff's favor in order for his
suit to be sustained.
O
It is the tort of causing someone to be prosecuted for a criminal act, knowing
that there was probable cause to believe that the plaintiff committed the crime.
The defendant must show that the plaintiff acted with some purpose other than
bringing the guilty to justice.
A mere complaint to the authorities is sufficient to establish the tort.
Question 3 (1 point)
Answer:
true because is True you say
select the case that would clearly be under the exclusive subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts. treason breach of contract a tort claim for injuries a child custody challenge
The case that would clearly be under the exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal courts is Treason.
Jurisdiction refers to the scope of the powers that the courts have over specific legal disputes. The jurisdiction of Federal Courts can be divided into two categories:
a. subject matter jurisdiction
b. personal jurisdiction.
Subject-matter jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear a particular type of case. For instance, the bankruptcy court has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases. The diversity of jurisdiction, the amount in controversy, and federal questions come under the subject-matter jurisdiction of federal courts. At the same time, personal jurisdiction deals with the extent of the court's power on the party being sued in a case. The U.S. Constitution requires that the court must have jurisdiction over the person being sued in a case and if the party doesn't make an objection to the jurisdiction of the court while being sued, although it hasn't in reality, it would be assumed the defendant is waiving his or her right to challenge the same.
Treason is a crime in which an individual betrays his or her country by taking up arms against it, plotting with its enemies, or providing them with aid or comfort. This crime is often linked with espionage or like activities, which is regarded as one of the most heinous offenses under the law. Treason is a crime under federal law. Therefore, cases involving treason would fall under the exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal courts.
Learn more about the Subject-Matter Jurisdiction of Federal Courts from: https://brainly.com/question/2123715
#SPJ11
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
Suppose Pappy wishes to sue Dory under a state negligence theory for $80,000 because he broke his neck. There is no federal question and Dory is a citizen of Michigan. Which court has jurisdiction? a only state court b only federal court c both state court and federal court d neither state court nor federal court
Suppose Pappy wishes to sue Dory under a state negligence theory for $80,000 because he broke his neck. There is no federal question and Dory is a citizen of Michigan. Both state court and federal court has jurisdiction. The answer is C.
The case involves diverse citizenship, and the amount of controversy is above the state's monetary threshold for hearing a case with different parties. The diversity jurisdiction concept is used to define the power of a federal court to hear lawsuits brought by individuals from distinct states or countries.
Federal jurisdiction arises in diverse cases if no plaintiff is a citizen of the same state as any defendant, and the sum of the plaintiff's claim exceeds $75,000. Federal jurisdiction is also established in cases where the parties are from separate countries, but the value of the dispute exceeds $10,000.
Thus, the federal courts would have jurisdiction over this case as the case satisfies the requirement of the diversity jurisdiction. State courts would also have jurisdiction to hear the case if the claim is above their jurisdictional limit.The answer is C.
To know more about jurisdiction, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714#
#SPJ11
Which of the following are legal protections available to a business that allow a business to capitalize on the firms intellectual property: (select all the answer options that are correct)
protection for a trade secret
a patent for an invention
a copyright for a written work
protection from extortion
Ideas, innovations, and creations with intellectual property are important to a company.
B) An invention that has a patent.
Intellectual property protection prevents a company's innovations from being used by rival businesses to their financial advantage. It grants a company the right to make the only profits from its ideas. By guaranteeing that businesses will profit from their innovations, protecting intellectual property promotes research and development.
Ideas, innovations, and creations with intellectual property are important to a company. A company's competitive advantage comes from these intangible resources. A person or organisation will benefit fully from ideas and creations if intellectual property is protected.
Learn more about business.
https://brainly.com/question/15826679
#SPJ4
even if property tax rates are not changed, the amount of ad valorem taxes imposed on realty may not remain the same. true or false
The statement "even if property tax rates are not changed, the amount of ad valorem taxes imposed on realty may not remain the same." is true as taxes imposed may not remain similar.
The amount of ad valorem taxes levied on real estate (property) may change, even if property tax rates stay the same. Ad valorem taxes are calculated based on the property's assessed value which can change over time. Property improvements, renovations, reassessments by taxing authorities and changes in property classification are just a few examples of the many variables that can affect a property's assessed value.
These elements may alter the property's assessed value and, as a result, the amount of ad valorem taxes levied against it. Therefore, the actual amount of taxes due on real estate can change even if the tax rates themselves do not change.
Learn more about property tax rates at:
brainly.com/question/3913152
#SPJ4
5. Police became aware of the crawl space because of a
coming from the air vents.
John Wayne facts
Answer:
Assuming this is about John Wayne Gacy, the police became aware of the crawlspace because of a foul odor coming from the air vents.
Are executive orders ever unconstitutional?
Answer:
The legal or constitutional basis for executive orders has multiple sources. ... Like both legislative statutes and regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if the orders lack support by statute or the Constitution.
Explanation:
.
Officers have been called to the scene of an altercation outside a crowded restaurant. Two men were evidently arguing over a sports event. The argument escalated, with both men throwing punches. By the time officers arrived on the scene, one man was holding his nose, which was profusely bleeding. The other was nursing a quickly blackening eye. Several people loitered around the entrance to the club. After speaking with both men on the scene, officers leave without making an arrest. What is the MOST likely reason for their choice in this situation?
Neither man wanted to press charges.
There were no witnesses to verify the fight.
There was no video camera footage of the fight.
The officers did not see evidence of a crime.
Answer:
Neither man wanted to press charges.
Explanation:
I'll just say why the other answers are wrong
B. There are witnesses, it says that several people were loitering around the club
C. There does not need to be camera footage of the fight to arrest one or both of the men and charge them with assault, battery, etc.
D. The officers arrived after the fight had ended and they had been injured, also officers do not personally have to witness a crime to charge an individual with one.
If unpaid preferred dividends must be "caught up" before any common dividends can be paid, they are called _________ dividends.
If unpaid preferred dividends must be "caught up" before any common dividends can be paid, they are called cumulative dividends.
Cumulative dividends are a type of preferred stock dividend that accumulates when it is not paid during the normal dividend distribution period.
This means that the unpaid dividends are carried over to the next dividend period and must be paid before any dividends can be paid to common shareholders.
Cumulative dividends are a way for companies to incentivize investors to purchase preferred stock, which generally has a lower dividend rate than common stock.
They provide a level of security to preferred shareholders, ensuring that they will eventually receive their dividend payments, even if the company is experiencing financial difficulties. This is because preferred shareholders have priority over common shareholders when it comes to receiving dividend payments.
In addition, cumulative dividends can be a way for companies to attract long-term investors who are interested in receiving a steady stream of income from their investments.
However, they can also be a burden for companies that are experiencing financial difficulties, as they must prioritize paying off the accumulated dividends before they can distribute any dividends to common shareholders or reinvest in the business.
Overall, cumulative dividends are an important feature of preferred stock that can provide stability and security for investors, but they can also create additional financial obligations for companies.
For more question on "Cumulative Dividends" :
https://brainly.com/question/14971141
#SPJ11
What is the name of the person whom the complaint is filed against
before being controversially struck down by the supreme court in the citizens united case, the mccain-feingold act:
The McCain-Feingold Act, officially known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), was a campaign finance reform legislation that was controversially struck down by the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case.
The McCain-Feingold Act, enacted in 2002, was a significant campaign finance reform law in the United States. Its main objectives were to restrict the use of soft money (unregulated funds) in federal elections, ban national political party committees from receiving soft money, and regulate issue advocacy advertisements. The act aimed to reduce the influence of corporations and unions in the political process, promoting fair and transparent elections.
However, in 2010, the Supreme Court's ruling in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case struck down key provisions of the act, allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money in support of political candidates. This decision led to a significant shift in campaign finance regulations and has been a subject of ongoing debate and controversy.
To learn more about United States click here, brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ11
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
A state law is:
Laws that are the same across the entire country.
Laws unique to that particular state.
Laws that do not come from the Constitution.
Laws that U.S. citizens must follow while visiting other countries.
Answer:
B. Laws that do not come from the Constitution.
Information from the Human Genome Project will:
A.all of the them.
B.help to reveal the role and implications of evolution
C.be useful for diagnosing and treating genetic diseases.
D.reveal the location of a gene on a particular chromosome.
Answer:
the answer is option D. Reveal the location of a gene on a particular chromosome.
Hope this helps you, if my answer was helpful can you give me a brainliest it will really help me and thank you have a nice day!
the author of the text feels that the most important aspect of robbery as a violent crime is the
The author of the text feels that the most important aspect of robbery as a violent crime is the potential for harm and violence towards the victim. Robbery involves taking something of value from someone through the use of force or threat of force.
It is a violent crime because it involves physical harm or the threat of harm to the victim. The author argues that the potential for violence is what makes robbery such a serious crime. In addition, the author emphasizes the psychological impact that robbery can have on the victim. The fear and trauma experienced during a robbery can have long-lasting effects on the victim's mental health and sense of safety. The author argues that this impact is just as important as the physical harm that may be inflicted.
Furthermore, the author highlights the fact that robbery often occurs in public places and can therefore impact the wider community. The fear of crime can lead to decreased public confidence in the safety of the area, which can have negative economic and social consequences. Overall, the author believes that the potential for harm and violence towards the victim, the psychological impact on the victim, and the impact on the wider community are the most important aspects of robbery as a violent crime.
To know more about Robbery visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31865813
#SPJ11
It is true or false that in the American legal system, case law results every time any court decides a case.
the answer is true explanation my uncle's an attorney
One difference between a sole proprietorship and a partnership is that a
partnership:
A. has fewer investors and stockholders.
B. has a longer legal life span as a business.
O c. divides profits among several owners.
D. gives greater control to its founder.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Mabey
One difference between a sole proprietorship and a partnership is that a partnership gives greater control to its founder. Thus, option D is correct.
Who is a sole proprietorship?A Sole Proprietorship is a straightforward, one-owner business that is run by only an individual and is legally identical to the owner. In a company with sole proprietorship, the organization's owner is personally liable for all debts and obligations. In a partnership, a few people pool their belongings for the company and split earnings and losses.
A sole proprietorship is an unregistered, uncontrolled business that is conducted by only one person and does not distinguish between the person who owns it and the company. A sole proprietorship's owner is accountable for the debts, damage, and liabilities of the company as well as all gains.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about sole proprietorship, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14555007
#SPJ2
which civil rights policies did the eisenhower adminstration pursue?
Withdrawal the national guard, Civil rights act 1957 and Civil rights act 1960 and Integration of us military forces are the civil rights policies the eisenhower administration pursue.
Eisenhower intervened in the Little Rock incident and told Governor Faubus to remove the national guard (he was trying to stop desegregation in schools). After that, he overturned segregation in public schools by appointing Earl Warren, the governor of California, as the court's chief justice. After that, schools were integrated.
Both the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts, In 1957, if states found new ways to prevent black people from voting, they would be looked into and prosecuted. As voting registers were checked and black people were legally permitted to vote in 1960, black voters' votes were unquestionably counted.
Eisenhower was a soldier before joining the military and intimately familiar with racial intolerance. He demanded that Truman's executive order 9981 be followed.
Learn more about Civil Rights Acts at:
brainly.com/question/12447824
#SPJ4
the long term damage done by heavy drinking or drug use is
Answer:
It can lead to addiction. If drinking then it will be hard to leave you would always be drunk and if you take drugs then you will become an addict
With reference to the relevant provision of law, discuss whether the death penalty is against human rights.
Answer:
The U.S. death penalty system flagrantly violates human rights law. It is often applied in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner without affording vital due process rights. Moreover, methods of execution and death row conditions have been condemned as cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment and even torture.
Explanation:
Economists argue that the best way to protect national security and provide for national defense is through _________.
complete embargo
imposition of sanctions
the implementation of isolationism
direct government subsidies
Economists argue that the best way to protect national security and provide for national defense is through direct government subsidies.
Direct government subsidies may be one approach to support national security and defense, but they are not the only one.
Other approaches might include investing in research and development of new technologies, supporting education and training programs to develop the skills needed by the defense industry, providing tax incentives to encourage private investment in national security-related industries, and engaging in international collaborations to share resources and expertise.
Some economists may argue that direct government subsidies are appropriate in certain circumstances, such as when a particular industry is critical to national security and is struggling to compete with foreign competitors.
In these cases, government subsidies may be necessary to ensure that the industry remains viable and can continue to provide the necessary goods and services to support national security.
However, other economists may argue that government subsidies can distort markets, encourage inefficiency, and create a dependence on government support that ultimately undermines national security.
They may argue that a better approach is to create a regulatory environment that encourages private investment and innovation, which can lead to the development of new technologies and capabilities that are essential for national security.
To learn more about subsidies, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30722203
#SPJ11
It is wrong to tell an impaired person that Law Enforcement Officers are patrolling the area, if you didn't
actually see them.
A. True
B. False