what is 0.2 writen as a %

Ronaldo therefore feeds his family 2 and 4/7 sandwiches as he eats sandwiches that are three and three-sevenths .

A mathematical strategy for resolving proportionality issues is the unitary method. Finding the value of one unit of a quantity and utilising that value to determine the value of a different number of units of the same quantity is what this process entails. The unitary technique can be used, for instance, to determine the cost of any quantity of apples if you know that 5 apples cost $10. $10/5 = $2 would be the price of one apple. By multiplying the quantity of apples by the price of one apple, you could then calculate the price of any other number of apples. For instance, 8 apples would cost 8 x $2, or $16, to purchase.

given

Ronaldo eats sandwiches that are three and three-sevenths of a sandwich, which is an incorrect fraction:

3 3/7 = (7*3 + 3)/7 = 24/7

He divides these sandwiches into thirds and fourths among his family, making a total of:

(3/4) * (24/7) = (324)/(47) = 18/7

We can change this incorrect fraction into a mixed number because:

18/7 = 2 and 4/7

Ronaldo therefore feeds his family 2 and 4/7 sandwiches as he eats sandwiches that are three and three-sevenths .

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

Answer:

To Solve a System of Equations by Elimination

Write both equations in standard form. ...

Make the coefficients of one variable opposites. ...

Add the equations resulting from Step 2 to eliminate one variable.

Solve for the remaining variable.

Substitute the solution from Step 4 into one of the original equations.

here! ( happy hoildays!)

The minimum cost that she will incur to fence her garden with dimensions, 32 m width and 48 m length, is K3,200.

The minimum cost is a product of the multiplication of the perimeter of the garden and the cost of materials per meter.

The perimeter shows the total length around the garden, which is two lengths and two widths.

The width of the rectangular garden = 32 m

The length of the rectangular garden = 48 m

The perimeter of the rectangular garden = 160 m [2 (32 + 48)]

The cost of fencing materials per meter = K20

The minimum cost for fencing the garden = K3,200 (K20 x 160)

Learn more about the minimum cost at https://brainly.com/question/29980720.

#SPJ1

A rectangular garden is 32 m wide and 48 m long. If the fencing material costs K20 per meter, then what would be the minimum cost to fence her garden?

The minimum cost that will be used to fence a rectangular garden with length 48 m and w 32 m is K3200

To calculate the minimum cost required to fence the garden, we need to find the perimeter of the rectangular garden.

Perimeter is given as,

P= 2(l + w)

l = 48 m, w = 32 m

Thus,

P = 2(48 m + 32 m) = 2(80 m)

P = 160 m

Since the perimeter of the garden is 160 m, hence, we need 160 meters of fencing material.

Given that the cost of fencing material is K20 per meter, the total cost to fence the garden would be:

Total cost = 160 m * K20 per m = K3200

Therefore, the minimum cost to fence the garden would be K3200.

Learn more about minimum cost on https://brainly.com/question/16000245

#SPJ1

Question is incomplete, find complete question below

A rectangular garden is 32 m wide and 48 m long. If the fencing material costs K20 per meter, then what would be the minimum cost to fence her garden?

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  -1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

The factor outside parentheses multiplies each term inside.

  5/2(-8/5 +7/5)

  = (5/2)(-8/5) +(5/2)(7/5)

  = -8/2 +7/2 = -1/2

The best statement that describes the strategy for estimating the perimeter of the figure (please see the attached diagram) is the option;

Ad the lengths of the horizontal and vertical segments, and then add 5 because the diagonal side is 4 units wide and 2 units tall

An estimate is an approximation of a true value, which is a value that is close to the actual value of the measured quantity.

Please find attached a diagram of the possible figure created with MS Word

The length of the side of the sides of the possible figure in the figure, obtained from a similar question on the internet are;

Base length = 5 units

Height = 4 units

The figure has a diagonal side which is 4 units wide and 2 units tall.

The length of the slant side, found using Pythagorean theorem can be obtained as follows; Length = √(4² + 2²) = 2·√5 ≈ 5

The correct option is therefore to add the lengths of the horizontal and vertical segments, and then add 5 because the diagonal side is 4 units wide and 2 units tall

Learn more on Pythagorean theorem here: https://brainly.com/question/25958868

#SPJ1

Beginning

Let's use proportion to answer this question.

Introduction:

To answer this question, we take the extremes and multiply it with each other and we take the middle terms and multiply with each other. In the end, we divide and get the value of x.

The word "extremes" defines that the last two terms in a proportion.

The phrase "middle terms" defines that the middle two terms in a proportion. Below is the solution.

Solution:

Conclusion:

Hence, the answer to your problem is 90 grams.

\(BrainiacUser1357\)

Answer:

We can use the formula for the area of a rectangle to solve this problem. Let's assume that the length of the top of the bookcase is L and the width is b. Then, we can write:

L × b = 300

Solving for b, we get:

b = 300 / L

Since we don't know the length L, we cannot find the exact value of b. However, we can use the given information to make an estimate. Let's say that the length of the bookcase is 60 inches. Then, we have:

b = 300 / 60 = 5

So, if the length of the bookcase is 60 inches, the width needs to be at least 5 inches to accommodate Bria's soap carving collection. However, if the length is different, the required width will also be different.

Answer:

---------------------------------------

Let the cost of the meal be x.

Adding a tip of 19%:

Answer:

Wyatt should multiply with 1.19.

Step-by-step explanation:

Forming the expression,

→ 1 + (19% of 1)

Now the required number is,

→ 1 + (19% of 1)

→ 1 + ((19/100) × 1)

→ 1 + (19/100)

→ 1 + 0.19 = 1.19

Hence, required number is 1.19.

The length of line CD is 20. 9

Note that triangle CDY is an isosceles triangle

Using the Pythagoras theorem

Hypotenuse square = opposite square + adjacent square

Hypotenuse = line CD

opposite = 20

Adjacent = 6

Substitute into equation

\(Line CD^2 = 20^2 + 6^2\)

\(Line CD^2 = 400 + 36\)

\(Line CD^2 = 436\)

Make line CD^2 subject by find the square root of the other side

\(Line CD = \sqrt{436}\)

\(Line CD = 20.9\)

Therefore, the length of line CD is 20. 9

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/231802

#SPJ1

Answer:

40

Step-by-step explanation:

\(8=2^3 \\ \\ 20=2^2 \times 5 \\ \\ \lcm(8,20)=2^3 \times 5=40\)

Answer:

x = 154.66666 repeating

pls shekels

Answer:

x=  \(\frac{464}{3}\)

Solving a linear equation

Then

1/2s = 7/2

(1/2)s = 7/2

Its important to use correctly parenthesis

In 1/2s, s is dividing

In (1/2)s , s is multiplying

Then

1/2s = 7/2

1/(7/2) = 2s

2/7 = 2 s

1/7 = s

And , using parenthesis if

(1/2)s = 7/2

s = (7/2)/(1/2) = 7

Answer:

y = -1/5x + 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

g(1) = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

the absolute value function always gives a positive result, that is

| - a | = | a | = a

to evaluate g(1) substitute x = 1 into g(x)

g(1) = - 3| 1 - 2| + 4

    = - 3| - 1| + 4

   = - 3(1) + 4

  = - 3 + 4

  = 1

Answer:

The answer is 72.49

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Gary had $75.49 to begin with.

Step-by-step explanation:

63 + 12.49 = 75.49

Gary spent $63 on bananas and after buying them he had $12.49, therefor you would add his remaining $12.49 to the $63 he spent in order to get the amount of money he had before buying the bananas.

Answer:

A, C, E are your answers

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution is Option A , Option C and Option E.

The simple interest at a principal of  $150 and annual rate of 4 % for 2 years is $ 12

What is Simple Interest?

Simple interest is a method of calculating interest that ignores the impact of compounding. While interest frequently compounds throughout the course of a loan's set periods, simple interest does not. Simple interest is calculated by multiplying the principal amount by the interest rate, times the number of periods.

Simple Interest = ( Principal Amount x Rate x Time Period ) 100

Given data ,

Let the principal be P = $ 150

Let the annual rate be R = 4 %

Let the time be T = 2 years

Now , the simple interest is calculated as SI = PRT / 100

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

Simple Interest = ( 150 x 4 x 2 ) / 100

Simple Interest = ( 150 x 2 ) / 25

Simple Interest = $ 12

So , the value of Simple Interest is $ 100

Now ,

a)

$300 at 2% for 2 years

Simple Interest = PRT / 100

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

Simple Interest = ( 300 x 2 x 2 ) / 100

Simple Interest = $ 12

c)

$400 at 3% for 1 year

Simple Interest = PRT / 100

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

Simple Interest = ( 400 x 3 x 1 ) / 100

Simple Interest = $ 12

e)

$50 at 48% for 6 months

Simple Interest = PRT / 100

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

Simple Interest = ( 50 x 48 x ( 1/2 ) ) / 100

Simple Interest = 48 / 4

Simple Interest = $ 12

Therefore , the Simple Interest is $ 12

Hence , The solution is Option A , Option C and Option E.

The simple interest at a principal of $150 and annual rate of 4 % for 2 years is $ 12

To learn more about Simple Interest click :

https://brainly.com/question/17282817

#SPJ2

The expression "F = {(x, y) : φ(x, y, p)}" represents a set of ordered pairs (x, y) that satisfy a condition defined by the function φ. The interpretation and nature of the set F depend on the specific function φ and the parameter p, which determine the relationship between the variables x, y, and p.

The expression "F = {(x, y) :  φ(x, y, p)}" represents a set F consisting of ordered pairs (x, y) that satisfy a particular condition defined by the function  φ, which takes the variables x, y, and p as inputs.

To fully understand the meaning of F, we need to delve into the function  φ and its relationship with the variables x, y, and p. The function φ could represent a wide range of mathematical relationships or conditions that determine the inclusion of certain pairs (x, y) in the set F.

For instance, let's consider a specific example where vraphi(x, y, p) is defined  φ(x, y, p) = \(x^2 + y^2 - p^2.\)In this case, F = {(x, y) : \(x^2 + y^2 - p^2\)= 0} represents a set of ordered pairs (x, y) that satisfy the equation \(x^2 + y^2 - p^2 = 0.\) This equation represents a circle with radius p centered at the origin (0, 0). Consequently, F corresponds to all the points lying on the circumference of this circle.

It is important to note that the specific meaning and implications of F heavily rely on the nature of the function  φ and the parameter p. Different functions and parameters will yield distinct sets F with their own unique characteristics and interpretations.

For more such information on: expression

https://brainly.com/question/28602085

#SPJ8

Answer:

jc is 40 i think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

40(Maybe)

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not 100% sure that 40 is correct but I'm pretty sure it is.

Answer:

1.89billions

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

The quantity demanded determined by the price P of wheat, and the relation is

P = 2.55 − 0.55D

Also, the quantity supplied is determined by the price P of wheat, in dollars per bushel, and the relation is

P = 2.13S − 0.65

At equilibrium, the price of wheat will be the same i.e;

2.13S-0.65 = 2.55-0.55D

Also since at the equilibrium price, the quantity supplied and the quantity demanded are the same, then S = D

Substitute into the formula

2.13S-0.65 = 2.55-0.55S

2.13S+0.55S = 2.55+0.65

2.68S = 3.20

S = 3.20/2.68

S = 1.194

Get the equilibrium price of wheat;

Given;

P = 2.13S − 0.65

P = 2.13(1.194) − 0.65

P = 2.5433-0.65

P = 1.893

Hence the equilibrium price of wheat is approximately 1.89billions

Answer:

The equilibrium price for wheat is 3.663 dollars per bushel

Step-by-step explanation:

The quantity of wheat, in billions of bushels, that wheat suppliers are willing to produce in a year and offer for sale, determined by the price P of wheat, is:

P = 2.13*S - 0.65

On the other hand, you know that the amount of wheat, in billions of bushels, that wheat consumers are willing to buy in a year, determined by the price P of wheat, is:

P = 2.55 - 0.55*D

The market equilibrium or point of equilibrium is that point where there is an equilibrium because the demanders are willing to buy the same units that the suppliers want to manufacture, for the same price.  

Being at the equilibrium price, the quantity supplied and the quantity demanded must be equal. So, being:

the quantity supplied S must be equal to the quantity demanded D:

S=D

\(\frac{P+0.65}{2.13} =\frac{P+2.55}{-0.55}\)

Solving:

\((-0.55)*\frac{P+0.65}{2.13} =P+2.55\)

\(\frac{-0.55}{2.13} *(P+0.65) =P+2.55\)

\(-\frac{55}{213} *(P+0.65) =P+2.55\)

\(-\frac{55}{213} *P-0.168 =P+2.55\)

\(-\frac{55}{213} *P-P =2.55+0.168\)

\(0.742*P =2.718\)

P=2.718÷0.742

P=3.663

The equilibrium price for wheat is 3.663 dollars per bushel

Answer:

290 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

$44(to rent the car) x 5 = $220

$7( for insurance) x 5 = $35

35$ for gas

Add all those prices up:

220 + 35 + 35= 290

I hope this helps...

The misleading about the data shown on the figure is the clas width

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The histogram

On the histogram, we have the following readings

From the above, we can see that

The above readings are not consistent i.e. the class widths are not equal

Hence, the misleading about the data shown on the figure is the clas width

Read more about graphs at

https://brainly.com/question/28350999

#SPJ1

The minimum value of Jeri Dammers' total deductions is $200.68.

Based on the given information, we can calculate the total deductions for Jeri Dammers as follows:

Social Security: Jeri pays 6% of the first S$90,000 of her gross pay towards Social Security. As her gross pay is only $735.00, her Social Security deduction will be:

Medicare: Jeri pays 1.45% of all her income towards Medicare. As her gross pay is $735.00, her Medicare deduction will be:

Federal Income Tax: To calculate the federal income tax, we need to refer to the tax tables provided by the IRS. As the gross pay is only $735.00, Jeri's federal income tax deduction will be very minimal or possibly none.

State Tax: Jeri pays 2% of her gross pay towards state tax. As her gross pay is $735.00, her state tax deduction will be:

Local Tax: Jeri pays 1.5% of her gross pay towards local tax. As her gross pay is $735.00, her local tax deduction will be:

Medical: Jeri has a deduction of $32.00 towards medical expenses.

Union Dues and Others: No information is given about Jeri's union dues or other deductions.

Therefore, the total deductions for Jeri Dammers will be:

We cannot calculate the exact value of Total Deductions without information about Union Dues and Others.

However, the minimum value of Total Deductions would be:

= $44.10 + $10.65 + $88.20 + $14.70 + $11.03 + $32.00

= $200.68

Therefore, the minimum value of Jeri Dammers' total deductions is $200.68.

Read more about deductions here:

https://brainly.com/question/29307306

#SPJ1

See full text below

Find the total deduction The person pays Social Security 6 percent of the first S90,000. Medicare is 1.45 percent of all income Use the tax tables for federal tax The state tax is 2 percent of gross pay and the local tax is 1.5 percent of gross pay. (Remember to add the Medical; Union Dues, and Others for total deduction: FIT Federal Income Tax, FICA Social Security) .4. Jeri Dammers is married and claims 3 allowances.

Dept

Employee

Check Number -3205

Gross Pay -$735.00

Net Pay

44B Jeri Dammers

Tax Deductions

Other Deductions

FIT

FICA

Medicare

State

Local

Medical -32.00

Union

Dues

Others

Answer:

864

Step-by-step explanation:

80/100 simplified is 4/5

so you do 4/5 of 1080

which is 1080 divided by 5 that is 216

and then 216 x 4 which is 864

The simplified expression for ( x - y ) ( x - y ) ( x - y ) is x³ - x²y - xy² + y³.

To simplify ( x - y ) ( x - y ) ( x - y ), we can expand the expression using the distributive property of multiplication. We can also simplify the expression by combining like terms.

In using the distributive property of multiplication, we multiply each term in the first set of parentheses by each term in the second set of parentheses. This gives us:( x - y ) ( x - y ) ( x - y ) = ( x(x - y) - y(x - y) ) ( x - y )= ( x² - xy - xy + y² ) ( x - y )= ( x² - 2xy + y² ) ( x - y )

Now we can further simplify the expression by combining like terms. We can use the difference of squares formula to simplify the second set of parentheses.( x² - 2xy + y² ) ( x - y ) = ( x - y ) ( x - y )²= ( x - y ) ( x² - 2xy + y² )= x³ - x²y - 2xy² + xy² - xy² + y³= x³ - x²y - xy² + y³

Therefore, the simplified expression is x³ - x²y - xy² + y³.

Summary: To simplify ( x - y ) ( x - y ) ( x - y ), we expand the expression using the distributive property of multiplication. We simplify the expression by combining like terms. We use the difference of squares formula to simplify the second set of parentheses. Finally, we simplify the expression further by combining like terms. The simplified expression is x³ - x²y - xy² + y³.

For more questions on expression

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ8

Given:

The number of cellular phones = 2,700

For the number of persons = 1,000

So, to find the number of phones per person, we will divide 2,700 by 1,000

so, the answer will be:

So, the answer is:

The number of phones person is 2 7/10

Answer:

cross multiple

17×f=34×7

17f/17=578/17

f=34

Answer:

-5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

The exact point at which the lines cuts the axis are unclear so I used the closest round number to substitute into the gradient formula. From the answer I noticed two things

Firstly it was a negative gradient...therefore the second and the fourth option wouldn't work

Secondly (if I were to ignore the operation) the number is less than 1 which would mean that it couldnt be an improper fraction where the numerator is greater than the denominator.

If you take what you notice about both the operation and the size of the number you would find that -5/9 fits the criteria the best and is therefore the answer to your question.

\( \frac{y2 - y1}{x2 - x1} \\ = \frac{0 - ( - 1)}{ - 2 - 0} \\ = - \frac{1}{2} \)