What is a moral?
A moral is the main idea of a story.
A moral is a main character who does the right thing.
A moral is a summary of the important events in a story.
A moral is a lesson or teaching about how to live or behave.

Napoleon Bonaparte was a French general and dictator during the last reigns of the French Revolution.

His legal reform, the Code Napoleon, had a major and lasting influence on the law in many countries. He is also remembered for his role in the Napoleonic Wars he provoked and for the title of emperor he assumed. He temporarily succeeded in bringing a large part of Europe under his authority.

As commander-in-chief of the French military power, he conquered and ruled most of western and central Europe and for a couple of years also held power in Egypt. The failed campaign against Russia then weakened his position, which eventually led to the final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo and the fall of Napoleon.

After Napoleon lost the Battle of Waterloo, he was deposed and exiled to the isolated island of Saint Helena in the middle of the Atlantic. There he died a few years later.

Learn more in https://brainly.com/question/15208543

Answer:

i would assume (C)

Explanation:

The principle is at the top of the social structure of a school, for example, with teachers, staff, and students following. The priest or minister is at the very top of the social structure in a church.

The social theory offers three degrees of contemplation rules for dealing with difficulties at any time. First, the guiding principles: solidarity, subsidiarity, and the common good; next, the evaluation standards, which are heavily emphasised in Benedict XVI's Encyclical Caritas in Veritate; and lastly, the instructions for action.

The Catholic Church declares that human life is sacrosanct and that a society's moral foundation rests on the dignity of every individual.

To know more about church visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11788311

#SPJ1

Answer:C

Explanation:

Between 1861 and 1865, there were at least four kidnap or assassination schemes hatched against President Abraham Lincoln.

The first known attempt was in 1861, when a group of secessionists in Baltimore, Maryland planned to assassinate Lincoln as he passed through the city on his way to his inauguration. However, the plot was discovered and Lincoln was able to safely reach Washington, D.C.

The second attempt occurred in 1864, when a group of Confederate soldiers planned to kidnap Lincoln and hold him for ransom. However, the plan was foiled when Union troops discovered the plot and the soldiers were captured.

The third attempt was also in 1864, when a group of Confederate sympathizers in New York City planned to set fire to multiple buildings in the city, including the hotel where Lincoln was staying. However, the plot was discovered, and the conspirators were arrested.

The final and successful attempt was in 1865, when John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C.

Overall, there were at least four kidnap or assassination schemes hatched against Lincoln during his presidency.

For more similar questions on Lincoln:

brainly.com/question/1410809

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hammurabi,the king of the small city-state of Babylon,ruled for 42 years making 282 laws being written in cuneiform.Together,these 282 laws carved into a large stone,make up what has come to be known as Hammurabi's code.Hammurabi's code was not just because some of the laws were not only greatly exaggerated towards those accused of crimes,but also the consequences of the suggested crimes were unfair and cruel when viewed through the 21st century perspective.Hummurabi's code is known to have been inscribed into stone in cuneiform.

Because laws were most literally written in stone,the laws could never be altered or changed to suit situations or "new times" better.This is seen as unfair in the 21st century perspective because,for example,The United States constitution can be added into and laws,or amendments,can and have been, repealed while none of this could've have been done to Hummurabi's code.

Hammurabi's Code was one of the earliest known legal codes, and its justice is a multifaceted question. It established 'an eye for an eye' principle which may seem just, but on the other hand, was grounded in a deeply class-divided society and thus unequal, which from a modern perspective, is unjust.

The question of whether or not Hammurabi's Code was just is a complex one. Hammurabi's Code, was one of the earliest and most complete written legal codes, proclaimed by the Babylonian king Hammurabi, who reigned from 1792 to 1750 B.C. The Hammurabi code of laws, a collection of 282 rules, established standards for commercial interactions and set fines and punishments to meet the requirements of justice.

The punishments were based on the principle of lex talionis, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth which to a certain extent may be considered just because it would try to ensure that punishments were equal to the crime. However, it's not based on equality before the law, but rather on a dividing society into three classes (nobles, commoners, and slaves), where the value of human life varied greatly, based on one's class. This, from a modern perspective, is morally wrong and therefore Was It Just from a contemporary perspective the answer would be no.

Answer:dont cheat on test or questions you are not learning

Explanation:

loser

Americans fought for freedom during the Revolution in two ways which are the Continental (national) Army and the State Militias.

The American Revolution was a time of great upheaval and change in the United States. It was a time when the Americans rose up against the British government and fought for their independence.

The Revolution was a time of great courage and determination, and it ultimately led to the founding of the United States of America. The Revolution was a long and hard-fought battle, and in the end, the Americans were victorious.

To know more about Revolution, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/1291142

#SPJ1

Answer:

Maybe

Explanation:

Because He might die any minute or sec if he had Sick

if not he maybe get murdered by his family or friends or someone that is his enemy am not a detective but I assume that this guy is been murdered:)

hanep sa english ahahah

Answer:

ss was main army force in nazi armie I only know this answer

These amendments were added to appease religious belief and define individual freedoms.

The premise of natural rights, and which maintains that people have particular liberties and freedoms granted by religious by God and claims that governments ought not to have the authority to take advantage of or infringe over these rights, was codified in the Bill of Rights, and these has emerged as a single of among the most significant documents in modern history.

This was a significant shift from earlier views of individual liberties, and assumed that citizens received their rights from the state or a king. Since the Bill of Rights was put into effect in the United States, it has impacted innumerable political figures all over the world.

Learn more about freedoms, here:

https://brainly.com/question/4077647

#SPJ4

Answer:

It was purchased in 1803.

Explanation:

It's really important cause it doubled the land of the united stated and it was sold off really cheap as well.

Answer:

1803

Explanation:

the failure of France to put down a slave revolution in Haiti,

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The Second Continental Congress made decisions like an actual government. It authorized the production of paper money and named Benjamin Franklin Postmaster General (in charge of the Post Office). Most importantly, it authorized the creation of the Continental Army and George Washington as Commander-in-Chief.

Answer:

monarchy

A monarchy has a king, queen, emperor or empress. The ruling position can be passed on to the ruler's heirs. In some traditional monarchies, the monarch has absolute power. But a constitutional monarchy, like the UK, also has a democratic government that limits the monarch's control

Answer:

The Declaration of Independence

each author's purpose in describing the behavior of elephants is unique, highlighting different aspects of these animals' behavior and intelligence. However, all three authors provide evidence of the cooperative, intelligent, and empathetic nature of elephants, challenging traditional perceptions of animals as unfeeling and unintelligent.

The three passages about studies involving the behavior of elephants each have a unique purpose in describing the behavior of these animals. The author of "Elephants Can Lend a Helping Trunk" seeks to highlight the cooperative and altruistic nature of elephants, while the author of "Elephants Know When They Need a Helping Trunk in a Cooperative Task" aims to provide a more detailed and scientific analysis of this behavior.

In "Elephants Can Lend a Helping Trunk," the author's purpose is to showcase the cooperative and selfless nature of elephants. The author presents anecdotes and examples of elephants helping each other in various ways, such as using their trunks to lift and support each other. The author's tone is positive and celebratory, highlighting the unique and admirable qualities of these animals.

In contrast, "Elephants Know When They Need a Helping Trunk in a Cooperative Task" takes a more scientific approach to studying the cooperative behavior of elephants. The author presents the results of a study in which elephants were tested on their ability to work together to solve a problem. The author's purpose is to provide a more detailed analysis of the mechanisms behind this behavior, highlighting the cognitive abilities and intelligence of elephants.

Finally, "Elephants Console Each Other" focuses on the emotional intelligence and empathy of elephants. The author presents evidence of elephants comforting and consoling each other in times of distress, highlighting the complex emotional lives of these animals. The author's purpose is to challenge the notion that animals lack emotions or empathy, and to showcase the unique qualities of elephants.

for more such questions on  passages

https://brainly.com/question/24217588

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The  Dominant Narrative of Columbus's Arrival brought about the exploration and colonization of the continent, it is  wrong because there is no total freedom.

It should be noted that he was able to get his  first voyage when he got to the united state of America which brought about how the European exploration as well as the colonization of the continent begins and the people were being coloniozed which made them not to have the total freedom as that time .

In conclusion , this brought about  Columbian exchange which was  important event in  Age of Discovery, as well as the  human history , hence we can conclude that Dominant Narrative of Columbus's Arrival brought about the exploration and colonization of the continent, it is  wrong because there is no total freedom because of the colonization of the people.

Learn more about Columbus at:

https://brainly.com/question/872469

#SPJ1

In his second administration, Jackson moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks. The correct option is A) moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks.

This action was a significant part of his broader efforts to eliminate the National Bank, which he believed was a corrupt institution that favored the wealthy and powerful over ordinary Americans. Jackson saw the bank as a threat to democracy and believed that it needed to be dismantled to ensure that the country's financial system worked for all Americans. 

Jackson's decision to move the government deposits out of the national bank and into state banks was part of his broader strategy to undermine the bank's power and reduce its influence over the nation's financial system. By taking this action, Jackson hoped to weaken the bank's ability to control credit and money supply, making it easier for ordinary Americans to access credit and loans, which he believed was essential to promoting economic growth and opportunity.

Jackson's actions had significant consequences for the nation's economy and financial system, contributing to a period of economic instability and financial speculation that lasted for several years. Despite these challenges, Jackson remained committed to his vision of a more democratic and inclusive financial system, and his legacy continues to shape American politics and economics to this day.

To learn more about federal government here:

https://brainly.com/question/695831#

#SPJ11

Complete Question

what action did jackson take in his second administration to destroy the national bank? multiple choice question. A) moved federal government deposits from the national bank to state banks. B) moved federal government deposits from state banks to the national bank.

The statement "people who have not yet been convicted of a crime, or people who are being held pretrial, comprise a large percentage of the US jail population" is true.

Explanation:Jails are meant to house individuals for short periods of time, typically a year or less, whereas prisons are meant to house individuals for longer periods of time, typically several years or more.People who have not yet been convicted of a crime, or people who are being held pretrial, comprise a large percentage of the US jail population. These people are generally being held in jail because they cannot afford to pay bail or because they are considered a flight risk or a danger to society. In 2018, the Prison Policy Initiative reported that around 465,000 people were being held in jails across the US while waiting for their cases to be processed. That is, more than 3 in 5 people in local jails were being held pretrial.

to know more about convicted visit
https://brainly.com/question/33524687
#SPJ11

Answer:

Land, labor, and capital also are known as factors of

✔ production

.

Economies must answer the three economic questions because resources are

✔ limited

.

If an economy does not answer the three economic questions, resources may

✔ run out

.

✔ Negative

consequences can result when an economy does not answer the three economic questions.

Explanation:

On Ed

Answer:

1,2,1,2       -production, limited, run out, negative

Explanation:

on edge

The factor of production that aided industrialization in Great Britain was the availability and accessibility of natural resources, specifically coal, and iron.

Britain had abundant reserves of coal and iron, which were necessary for the development and expansion of industries such as iron production, textile manufacturing, and transportation.

Coal was used as a fuel source for steam engines, which powered machinery and enabled factories to operate more efficiently.

Iron was also crucial for the construction of machines, railroads, and infrastructure necessary for industrial growth.

Additionally, Britain's geographical location and access to ports allowed for easy import and export of raw materials and finished goods, further stimulating industrialization.

The combination of these factors enabled Great Britain to become a leader in industrialization during the 18th and 19th centuries.

Know more about industrialization here:

https://brainly.com/question/585177

#SPJ11

Answer:

its b

Explanation:

The view of Thomas Jefferson, author of the United States Declaration of Independence, was that the act should be justified and affirm natural and legal rights.

Thomas Jefferson, along with Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Robert R. Livingston, and Roger Sherman, formed the committee charged with making the declaration of independence.

Perhaps because of his reputation as a writer, Jefferson was asked to write a first draft and referenced his own proposal for the Virginia Constitution and also George Mason's draft for the Virginia Declaration of Rights. .

In the draft of the declaration, Jefferson anticipated the vision of the United States as a great empire of liberty that would promote democracy and fight against oppression.

He knows more about the Declaration of Independence at https://brainly.com/question/14578050

#SPJ4

Answer:

Pearl harbor

Explanation:

I'm sorry if I get it wtong

Answer:

Nomads produce valuable products like meat, hides, wool, and milk. These resources were useful for the larger economy around them, so they were sought after. This gave them an advantage.

Answer:

Socialism has the greatest goal of common wealth; Since the government controls almost all of society's functions, it can make better use of resources, labors and lands; Socialism reduces disparity in wealth, not only in different areas, but also in all societal ranks and classes.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

because they weren´t really powerful at the time and the soviet and us was the main places where the cold war really mattered

Explanation: