An offer is made when a person shows a willingness to enter into a legally binding contract. An invitation to treat (I.T.T) is merely a supply of information to tempt a person into making an offer.
The Romans had a system of judges who acted as a jury they were called:
O Leges
O Judices
O Pax Leges
Judicators
Answer:
judices
Explanation:
I learned it in middle school
What motive does an interest group have to file an amicus curiae brief?
A. to file a lawsuit that will automatically originate in a higher court
B. to influence a court’s interpretation of law to a litigant’s benefit
C. to try to reverse the outcome of a previous Supreme Court case
D. to appeal legislation that it sees as harmful to its interests
The motive an interest group has to file an amicus curiae brief is to influence a court's interpretation of the law to a litigant's benefit. Therefore, the correct option is B.
The interest group's brief may help a court to better understand the issues, the potential impact of the court's ruling, and the potential consequences of the ruling for individuals or organizations not party to the case.
In detail, an amicus curiae is a "friend of the court" brief filed by an individual or entity who is not a party to the case but has an interest in the outcome. Interest groups are frequently the entities that file amicus briefs, and they do so to offer a perspective that may not be represented by the parties themselves.
In a legal case, the interest group files an amicus brief to support a particular outcome that aligns with the group's interests. The brief's content and argument must be relevant to the case, as the interest group is not allowed to advocate for issues outside of the case's scope.
The goal of an amicus curiae brief is to assist a court in making a decision by providing information or legal analysis. This information can be useful to a court, particularly in cases with far-reaching implications that may affect entities or individuals not a party to the case.
Know more about the an amicus curiae brief click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15520019
#SPJ11
in the years following reconstruction, southern state governments deprived black citizens of the right to vote by all of the following means except
Amending state constitutions to explicitly reserve the vote exclusivity to white men.
The right to vote is a citizen's most fundamental right in a democracy. Without this protection, the government can simply disregard its citizens and even mistreat them.
In actuality, this is what happened to African American residents of the South after the Civil War's Reconstruction. Despite the 14th and 15th amendments protecting black Americans' civil rights, white supremacist state governments gradually restricted their ability to vote.
Congress took action after the Civil War to stop Southerners from re-establishing white supremacy. The majority of the South was placed under federal military administration in 1867 thanks to the Radical Republicans in Congress.
To know more about vote, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ4
Safe driving involves only mental exercise.
A. TRUE
B. FALSE
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Being a safe driver means being alert, always driving to the conditions of the road environment and being ready to take action at any time. Whether you be an experienced, older or new driver, a passenger, bike rider or pedestrian, read on for tips for keeping everyone safe on the road. Drivers of any age that have a long-term or permanent physical or mental condition that may affect their ability to drive, have a legal obligation to notify VicRoads. If you fail to do so you may be placing yourself and others at risk, jeopardising your insurance, or facing fines and the loss of your licence. so in conclusion its false
Explain the statement, "If we didn't
have government, we'd invent it" and
support your explanation with
evidence.
Explanation of the General Strain Theory in criminology?
A cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in your bank in Italy. What documents would you require him to do it? Imagine that the trader explains his business in detail, and he says that he buys cryptocurrency online and sells them for more money to make a profit. He has financial statements; ha pays taxes and has all of this in the rule. Do you think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes? Would you open the account to him?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If a cryptocurrency trader wants to open a bank account in my bank in Italy, I would be very strict in order to proceed with his request. I would double-check the present legislation in Italy regarding Anti-money Laundering and all the laws regarding international finance and banking transactions. And do not want to have any problems with the law.
The documents I would require him to provide are the legal constitution of his company in a real country, not in the so-called "fiscal paradises" such as Andorra. He would have to provide me with all the documents that prove he runs a legal business and I would take these documents to the legal department of the bank to prove and certify them.
I would also ask my assistant to personally check on the web or public criminal records to know if the ma's company has had any problems in the past that had affected his reputation.
I would ask him to explain his business in detail, with the presence of an expert in the cryptocurrency business. I would require a copy of the company's financial statements, his taxes, and proof that he has no debt. He needs to prove that all the documents are in perfect rule.
Yes, I think his economic activity is risky for AML purposes because that is the nature of the cryptocurrency business. It has not been regulated by any government in the world. That is the reason why almost no bank in the world or country accepts cryptocurrency as normal currency. It is so volatile. Indeed, nobody regulates cryptocurrency. And the proof is the thew bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies change their value on a daily basis.
I would think twice about accepting opening the account to hi, It is risky to the first degree.
Drivingschool4me course answers and permit answers ?
While using cruise control, _____.
A. you don't need to steer or brake
B. you still need to steer and brake
C. you don't need to pay attention to the road
D. you still need to press the accelerator to maintain speed
Answer:
you're answer is B you still need to steer and brake.
B) you still need to steer and brake
Explanation: Cruise control only maintains speed (you can take your foot off the accelerator), BUT you still need to maintain the rest.
major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by
Major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by the primary election process. In the United States, the primary elections allow registered party members and, in some cases, unaffiliated voters to participate in selecting their party's nominee for the presidential election.
This process involves a series of state-level primary elections and caucuses in which voters express their preferences for a particular candidate.
The primary election process has become the dominant method for selecting major-party presidential nominees over the years. It allows for broader participation and a more democratic approach compared to the previous system, which relied heavily on party leaders and delegates at the national conventions to choose the nominees.
Through primary elections, voters have a direct say in determining the candidate who will represent their party in the general election. Candidates campaign extensively, seeking support from voters across different states and competing to secure the majority of delegates needed to win the party's nomination.
To know more about presidential nominations refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31185431
#SPJ11
Identify 10 religions in the world and speculate a rule peculiar to each
Answer:
Christian
Dydyducruehfydfdrr
which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity that the form is out of date with respect to current law?
A will that specifies an executor or an exception has a significant risk of being declared invalid since the form is no longer lawful under the law. Option (d) is Correct.
The person in charge of running the operations of a decedent's probate estate is known as the executor (for men) or executrix (for women). The chosen word is the same as the personal representative. It can be a smart idea to name a family member as executor if you believe they can handle the responsibility. Examples include naming a grandchild who is an adult, a niece or nephew, or one of your offspring.
A woman who has been charged with carrying out a final will and testament's instructions is known as an executrix. Both an executrix and an executor are accountable for the same things. The executor's primary responsibility is to follow out the deceased's instructions for managing their affairs and wishes. If there was no prior appointment, the executor is chosen either by the testator—the person who creates the will—or by the court.
Learn more about law visit: brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Which type of will involves serious risks of invalidity and may not reflect the provisions of current law?
A. marital share
B. statutory
C. formal
D. exemption trust
E. living
In 100 words or more, discuss the forensic significance of bloodstain pattern analysis.
Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is a forensic technique that involves the examination of bloodstain patterns to infer the events that led to the bloodshed. BPA can provide crucial information for criminal investigations by reconstructing the sequence of events, identifying the weapon used, determining the position and movements of the victim and perpetrator, and corroborating or contradicting witness testimony.
BPA can help answer questions such as whether the victim was standing or lying down when injured, the direction of blood flow, and the number of blows or wounds inflicted. By analyzing the size, shape, distribution, and location of bloodstains, BPA can help investigators establish the credibility of a witness's account of events, and identify inconsistencies or discrepancies in their testimony.
BPA can also help identify suspects by analyzing bloodstain patterns on their clothing or body. For example, the presence of spatter stains on a suspect's clothing may indicate their involvement in a violent crime.
Overall, BPA is a valuable tool in criminal investigations and can provide crucial evidence that can be used in court to support or refute witness testimony, reconstruct events, and help identify suspects
Plz Harry!!!
Who has to approve the governor's appointment of judges?
a the Senate
b the House
c the voters
d the justices
Answer:
a. the senate
Explanation:
the senate approves the governors appointment of judges
Answer:
c the voters
Explanation:
who tryna start a convo?
Answer:
hey
Explanation:
MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
the following are examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts except: group of answer choices appellate court family court traffic court probate court
The appellate court is not an example of limited jurisdiction trial courts
Appellate courts hear and assess appeals in the American legal system. Appellate courts review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to ensure that they are fair and that the correct law was applied. It is not an illustration of a trial court with restricted jurisdiction. In matters that have been appealed from lower courts, an appellate court instead evaluates the legal questions and arguments raised in written briefs and during oral arguments rather than conducting trials or hearing evidence.
The other three given options namely family court, traffic court, and probate court are all examples of limited jurisdiction trial courts, which are tribunals with the power to hear and decide issues pertaining to a specific area of law or subject matter.
Read more about the Appellate court on:
https://brainly.com/question/11744340
#SPJ4
What is a group of design theory?
Answer:
it is said to be an Abelian group
Explanation:
there are 12 universal government due care standards in the u.s. true or false?
False. There isn't a specific set of 12 universal government due care standards in the U.S.
Instead, there are various laws, regulations, and guidelines that govern different aspects of due care for different sectors and situations.
In the United States, there are various laws, regulations, and guidelines that govern different aspects of due care for different sectors and situations.
For example, in the healthcare industry, due care standards might include ensuring that patients receive appropriate medical treatment and care, maintaining patient confidentiality, and protecting patient records.
In the financial industry, due care standards might include conducting thorough background checks on potential employees, ensuring compliance with regulations and laws, and safeguarding customer financial information.
Similarly, different states may have different requirements for due care in certain situations. For example, some states may require businesses to take reasonable measures to protect their customers from harm, while others may require them to take additional precautions to ensure the safety of employees.
Overall, due care standards in the United States are not limited to a specific set of 12 universal government standards. Rather, they are established through a combination of laws, regulations, and industry-specific guidelines that vary depending on the sector, industry, and context in which they apply.
To learn more about finance industry, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30277433
#SPJ11
If you keep an asset for longer than 12 months the government will________ your tax when you sell that item.
Increase
Reduce
Enhance
Elevate
A tombstone ad is permitted in Regulation D offerings
Hello. The full question is:
A tombstone ad:_________
a. is permitted in Regulation D offerings.
b. is an offer to sell securities.
c. can be run prior to the effective date of the registration.
d. all of the above
Answer:
c. can be run prior to the effective date of the registration.
Explanation:
Tombstone is a type of advertisement that presents a list of organizations that are involved in a new specific offer, promoting a wide range of options to the consumer. In addition, this type of advertisement is very efficient in showing important information about the offer, even before the effective date of registration.
State whether each of the following was a result of the Modified Final Judgment of 1984, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, or neither:
a. The FCC was created to watch over interstate telephone systems.
b. AT&T had to sell off its local telephone companies.
c. The LATA was created.
d. Cable television companies could provide local telephone service.
e. Customers could choose between different long-distance telephone providers.
f. AT&T split off its technology division, which became Lucent.
a. Neither - The FCC was created in 1934 with the passage of the Communications Act.
b. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - AT&T was required to divest its local telephone companies, which became known as the Baby Bells.
c. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - The Local Access and Transport Area (LATA) was created as part of the divestiture of AT&T.
d. Telecommunications Act of 1996 - The Act allowed cable television companies to provide local telephone service and compete with traditional telephone companies.
e. Telecommunications Act of 1996 - The Act introduced competition in the long-distance telephone market and allowed customers to choose between different long-distance providers.
f. Modified Final Judgment of 1984 - AT&T was required to divest its technology division, which became known as Lucent Technologies.
Learn more about FCC here:
https://brainly.com/question/29890205
#SPJ11
The american law institute established the law model penal code to unife criminal law across tge 50 states. how many staes have adopted the entire code
As per the cutoff in September 2021, not all 50 states in the United States have adopted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) The entire Model Penal Code (MPC) was established by the American Law Institute (ALI).
The MPC is a comprehensive model code that seeks to harmonize criminal laws across jurisdictions and provide a framework for the revision and development of criminal statutes.
Whereas the MPC has been persuasive in forming criminal laws and has been received in shifting degrees by diverse states, it is vital to note that the selection of the complete code isn't widespread. A few states have received parts or areas of the MPC, whereas others have not received it at all.
The degree of appropriation and joining of the MPC's provisions shifts from state to state, and there's no definitive number of states that have embraced the whole code. A few states may have consolidated considerable parcels of the MPC into their criminal statutes, whereas others have made more restricted appropriations or alterations.
To learn about Model Penal Code visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31667549
#SPJ4
Which law has made ethics training even more important?A. Title VII of the Civil Rights ActB. The Fair Labor Standards ActC. Sarbanes-Oxley ActD. The False Claims ActE. The Occupational and Safety Act
The law that has made ethics training even more important is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
What is C. Sarbanes-Oxley Act?Federal legislation known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed stringent financial and auditing standards for publicly traded firms. To assist shield shareholders, employees, and the general public from accounting mistakes and dishonest financial activities, legislators enacted the legislation.
The U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on July 30 of that year in an effort to safeguard investors against misleading financial reporting by businesses. 1 Also referred to as the SOX Act of 2002, it required stringent updates to current securities laws and placed severe new penalties on offenders.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Learn more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act at:
https://brainly.com/question/5481344
#SPJ1
Define sexual behavior
Answer:
That is the definition.
Hope it helped.
Assumption of the risk is NOT a defense available to defendants in products liability cases. T/F
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Assumption of risk does not protect the defendant from all possible injuries. If the plaintiff uses a product despite being aware of a dangerous defect but is injured by another, unknown defect, there is no bar on recovery for that other injury.
True, the assumption is not a defense available to defendant.
Basically, a product liability is policy that provide compensation for user who suffers damage or injury because of use of a particular product.
Assumption of risk is use to describe when a Plaintiff uses the product despite being aware that the product has a dangerous defect.
In law, the assumption of the risk is not a defense available to defendants because he is entitled to ensure product produced are safe for use.
Therefore, it is true that assumption of the risk is not a defense available to defendants in products liability cases.
Read more on this here
brainly.com/question/21487428
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
know the 12 different characteristics of handwriting that experts analyze during a forensic investigation
Forensic handwriting analysis is the examination of handwriting and signatures with the aim of identifying the author. There are numerous characteristics of handwriting that are analyzed by forensic experts. The following are the 12 different characteristics of handwriting that experts analyze during a forensic investigation
1. Shape2. Slant3. Size4. Letter spacing5. Word spacing6. Line quality7. Connecting strokes8. T-crossing and I-dotting9. Pressure10. Baseline11. Margins12. Fancy curls, loops, and flourishes.1. Shape - This refers to the overall appearance of the letters, such as whether they are angular or round.
2. Slant - This refers to the degree of slope in the letters, whether they are leaning to the right, left, or straight up and down.
3. Size - This refers to the relative size of the letters.
4. Letter spacing - This refers to the spacing between letters within a word.
5. Word spacing - This refers to the spacing between words.
6. Line quality - This refers to the smoothness, shakiness, or shagginess of the lines.
7. Connecting strokes - This refers to the way the letters connect to each other.
8. T-crossing and I-dotting - This refers to the consistency of these strokes.
9. Pressure - This refers to the pressure applied to the pen or pencil when writing.
10. Baseline - This refers to the imaginary line upon which the letters rest.
11. Margins - This refers to the distance between the edge of the page and the text.
12. Fancy curls, loops, and flourishes - This refers to the decorative elements of the handwriting.
To know more about forensic investigation
visit https://brainly.com/question/33523642
#SPJ11
Liability as an accomplice does not extend to negligent and reckless conduct on the part of a
primary actor that results in a criminal offense.
False
True
Two constitutional amendments adopted in part because of wartime influences were the 18th, which dealt with _____, and the 19th, whose subject was _____.
prohibition; woman suffrage
The two constitutional amendments adopted in part because of wartime influences were the 18th amendment, which dealt with prohibition, and the 19th amendment, whose subject was woman suffrage.
The 18th amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors, while the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote.
Both of these amendments were influenced by wartime events and attitudes, as the 18th amendment was passed in part due to concerns about the impact of alcohol on soldiers during World War I, and the 19th amendment was passed in part due to the contributions of women during the war.
To know more about constitutional amendments, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/699977#
#SPJ11
31
Marks: 1
Interest received on a refund from an amended return is:
Choose one answer.
a. Tax-exempt interest reported on Form 1040, line 8b.b. Never paid by the IRS.c. Taxable interest that must be claimed on the Form 1040-X.d. Taxable interest that must be claimed in the year it is received.
Interest received on a refund from an amended return is Taxable interest that must be claimed on the Form 1040-X.
If your taxable interest income exceeds $1,500, include it on Schedule B (Form 1040), Interest and Ordinary Dividends, and attach it to your tax return. When filing Form 1040-NR, please refer to the Instructions for Form 1040-NR for specific reporting information. The interest on 2019 refunds is taxable, and taxpayers must report it on their 2020 federal income tax return.
Learn more on Form 1040
https://brainly.com/question/29131572
#SPJ4