The purpose of a court of last resort is C. To make sure that litigants stop appealing cases.
What is a court of last resort ?The purpose of a court of last resort is to provide a final avenue for appeals in the legal system. It is responsible for reviewing decisions made by lower courts, ensuring that they are consistent with the law, and correcting any errors that may have been made.
The court of last resort is usually the highest court in a jurisdiction, and its decisions are final and binding. The court's role is not to make litigants stop appealing cases, but to provide a fair and impartial review of legal disputes and ensure that justice is served.
Find out more on courts of last resort at https://brainly.com/question/279694
#SPJ1
When is it acceptable, if ever, to disobey the law?
Disobeying the law is generally not acceptable; however, there are rare situations where it may be morally justifiable or necessary.
Examples include instances of civil disobedience to protest unjust laws or to advocate for social change. In such cases, individuals may intentionally break the law to draw attention to systemic injustices or to challenge laws that violate fundamental rights. However, the decision to disobey the law should be based on careful consideration of the consequences and adherence to nonviolent principles. It is crucial to understand that these situations are exceptional and require a strong moral and ethical justification.
Learn more about civil disobedience here:
https://brainly.com/question/29553069
#SPJ11
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Brian, a bean farmer, and Crystal, a rice farmer. Brian and Crystal both
always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2019 the price of beans was $5, and the price of rice was $3.
Suppose that in 2020 the price of beans was $10 and the price of rice was $6.
Inflation was
Keep the Highest 5/7
Indicate whether Brian and Crystal were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off Worse Off Unaffected
O
Brian
Crystal
Now suppose that in 2020 the price of beans was $7.50 and the price of rice was $6.
The inflation in 2017 existed at 100% and both Charles and Dina exist unaffected.
What is inflation?
In economics, inflation exists as a general accumulation in the prices of goods and services in an economy. When the general price level rises, each unit of money buys fewer goods and services; therefore, inflation corresponds to a decrease in the purchasing power of money.
1. In 2016 the price of beans existed at $1, and the price of rice was $4 but in 2017, the price of beans existed at $2 and the price of rice existed at $8.
This indicates that the market basket has increased from $5 to $10. The inflation will be: = (10 - 5) / 5 × 100 = 100%
Therefore, both of them exist unaffected by the increase in price.
2. If the price of beans existed at $2 and the price of rice was $4.80, then the market basket stands at $6.80. Therefore, the inflation will be:
= (6.80 - 5) / 5 × 100
= 36%
Inflation is 36%. In this case, Charles exists better off because the price of beans contains doubled.
3. The Inflation established on the information provided will be:
= (3.60 - 5) / 5 × 100
= -28%
In this case, Charles stands still better off and there's a fall in inflation by 28%.
4. It should be remarked that the relative price of rice and beans matters additional to Charles and Dina.
To learn more about inflation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/850547
#SPJ9
The complete question is,
Consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Charles, a bean farmer, and Dina, a rice farmer. Charles and Dina both always consume equal amounts of rice and beans. In 2016 the price of beans was $1, and the price of rice was $4.
1. Suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $8.
(a) Inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
2. Now suppose that in 2017 the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $4.80.
(a) In this case, inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
3. Now suppose that in 2017, the price of beans was $2 and the price of rice was $1.60.
(a) In this case, inflation= ?%
(b) Indicate whether Charles and Dina were better off, worse off, or unaffected by the changes in prices.
Better Off
Worse Off
Unaffected
Charles
Dina
4. What matters more to Charles and Dina?
The overall inflation rate
or
The relative price of rice and beans
generally, a promise is legally enforceable even if nothing is given or received for the promise.
False. A promise is not generally legally enforceable without consideration, which is defined as a bargained-for exchange between the parties.
Consideration can be in the form of money, goods, services, or a promise to do or not do something. It is necessary to show that the parties intended to enter into a legally binding agreement and that they each received something of value in exchange for their promises. If there is no consideration, the promise is not enforceable by law.
The concept of consideration is a fundamental aspect of contract law, as it ensures that both parties have given and received something of value in exchange for their promises. It is a requirement for the formation of a contract, and without it, a promise is not legally binding. This principle prevents one party from making a promise without any obligation to fulfill it, which could lead to fraudulent or unjust practices.
to learn more about fundamental aspect click here:
brainly.com/question/28526965
#SPJ11
Regarding laws to protect people from discrimination based on sexual orientation, which of the following statements is true?
- All states have such laws.
- Many states and the District of Columbia have such laws.
- All states plus the federal government have such laws.
- None of these statements is correct.
Many states and the District of Columbia have laws to protect people from discrimination based on sexual orientation. However, it is important to note that not all states have these laws in place. In fact, as of 2021, only 21 states plus the District of Columbia have comprehensive laws that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and in areas.
It is worth noting that although the federal government does not have comprehensive laws that protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, there are some protections in place.
For example, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers cannot discriminate against employees based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Additionally, the Supreme Court's 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County extended these protections to cover discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace.
Overall, while progress has been made in protecting individuals from discrimination based on sexual orientation, there is still work to be done to ensure that all states have comprehensive laws in place to protect the LGBTQ+ community.
Many states and the District of Columbia have laws to protect people from discrimination based on sexual orientation. While not all states have such laws, a significant number have enacted legislation to prevent discrimination in areas like employment, housing, and public accommodations.
Additionally, the federal government has also taken steps to address discrimination, such as the Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
It is important to note that there is still room for improvement in providing comprehensive protections for all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation.
Visit here to learn more about Discrimination:
brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ11
Stop Building the Wall
3 Pros and 3 cons
Answer:
The immediate withdrawal of building a border wall would bring some benefits. First, it would allow people who are asylum seekers to come. Secondly, it would redistribute more resources to the Department of Homeland Security. Finally, it would save the American people millions of dollars.
In contrast, the three cons of not having a border wall would be a possible increase in crime. Secondly, the flood of undocumented persons. Finally, as a country, we would be vulnerable to attack by any of our enemies on the world stage.
Explanation:
I hope this helps you develop your idea further.
traditional roles of police
Answer:
Police typically are responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities. These functions are known as policing.
what is the term used to describe an intellectual movement when europeans began to question earlier beliefs and policies including those of absolutist rulers?
The term used to describe an intellectual movement when europeans began to question earlier beliefs and policies including those of absolutist rulers is Enlightenment.
What was the Enlightenment?The "long" 18th century, from the late 17th century to the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars in 1804, is known as the "Enlightenment," and it is characterized by serious scientific, political, and philosophical discourse.
The Enlightenment was a late 17th and early 18th century intellectual movement in Europe that emphasized reason and individualism over tradition.
Learn more about Enlightenment at:
https://brainly.com/question/12481854
#SPJ1
A Notary Signing Agent shows up to an assignment only to discover it has been rescheduled at the last minute for the following day. What is the agent required to do with the documents?
Answer:
I am positive this is correct. Return them to the Contracting Company. give me brainliest
Explanation:
Answer:
drstroy the documents in the proper manor
What form of restitution is used to repay society as a whole?
What is stamped onto the base of all bullet casings
I think your answer is headstamp and its at the bottom of a cartidge case.
William sued a reckless driver who collided with his car. He would likely be
awarded punitive damages in which of the following situations?
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.
B. The plaintiff's damages did not reach the required minimum.
C. The driver did not show remorse or apologize.
D. The driver was uninsured and not paying attention.
Answer:
A. Plaintiffs with similar cases had been awarded punitive damages.Explanation:
"Should juvenile delinquents be required to obtain employment as a condition of their probation/disposition?"
The effectiveness of requiring juvenile delinquents to obtain employment as a condition of probation/disposition is debatable and context-dependent.
The question of whether juvenile delinquents should be required to obtain employment as a condition of their probation/disposition is a complex one with varying perspectives. Supporters argue that requiring juvenile delinquents to obtain employment can have positive effects. It can teach them responsibility, discipline, and valuable skills that can improve their prospects for a successful future. Employment can provide structure and a sense of purpose, diverting them from negative influences and activities. It may also help them develop a sense of self-worth and contribute to their rehabilitation process.However, opponents raise concerns about the potential negative consequences. They argue that forcing employment on juvenile delinquents may not address the underlying issues that led to their delinquent behavior. It may also place unrealistic expectations on young individuals who may not be ready for the demands and responsibilities of the workforce. Additionally, employment may interfere with their educational pursuits and limit their opportunities for personal growth and development.Ultimately, the decision should consider individual circumstances, the specific needs of the juvenile, and the available resources for support and guidance. A comprehensive approach that combines employment opportunities with counseling, education, and other interventions may be more effective in reducing recidivism and promoting the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents.For more questions on juvenile
https://brainly.com/question/2140805
#SPJ8
Select the correct answer.
George has been sentenced to a thirty years in prison. Considering this information, which crime might he have committed?
A.
speeding
B.
traffic violation
C.
murder
D.
trespassing
Answer: Murder
Answer:
C
Explanation:
All the others are minor offenses which can give you a fine, comunity service, or a minor sentence but only murder can give you 30 years.
the key difference between modern liberals, conservatives, and libertarians is their view of
In keeping with the common US meanings of conservative and liberal, libertarianism in the United States has been described as conservative on economic issues.
Economic liberalism and fiscal and liberal conservatism on personal liberty, civil libertarianism,and cultural liberalism.The Liberals focused on the government still running much of the economy, but with more social freedoms, and the conservatives focused on the government continuing to uphold traditional social norms but allowing freedoms,especially around the use of free markets.Liberalism is the predominant ideology of the left and conservatism is the predominant ideology of the right.Those who hold beliefs between liberalism and conservatism or a mix of beliefs on this scale are called moderates.
To learn more about libertarianism please click on below link.
https://brainly.com/question/14296406
#SPJ4
in the context of the fair labor standards act of 1938, individual coverage refers to the protections offered to:
In the context of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, individual coverage refers to the protections offered to individual employees who are engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a federal law in the United States that establishes standards for minimum wage, overtime pay, and child labor. It provides various protections to workers to ensure fair treatment and compensation in the workplace. Under the FLSA, individual coverage means that employees who are involved in interstate commerce or the production of goods for interstate commerce are entitled to the rights and benefits granted by the Act. This includes provisions such as the federal minimum wage, overtime pay at a rate of one and a half times the regular rate for hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek, and restrictions on child labor.
To know more about Fair Labor Standards Act, click here: brainly.com/question/12300130
#SPJ11
help write some
Explain how federal and unitary forms of government differ.
State which form you think is better.
Include details and examples to support your answer.
The division of power between the national and sub-national levels of government differs between federal and unitary models of government. Federalism promotes regional diversity and autonomy.
What distinguishes a unitary type of government?In contrast to a federal government, which divides its power between the centre and the units, a unitary government places all of its authority in the central government.
What are some examples of the federal and unitary forms of government?In a federal system of government, the national government delegated some of its authority to each of the nation's constituent parts. For instance, in India, the Central Government and the several State Governments share authority. With a unitary type of governance, a single government holds all the reins.
To know more about national visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27896350
#SPJ1
What is the role of the Senate majority leader ?.
Speaking on behalf of the party with the most senatorial seats is the majority leader. To bring legislation to a vote, the Senate majority leader must coordinate with party members and the minority leader.
What does the leader of the majority party in the House do?The House Majority Leader is the second-highest-ranking member of their party's House caucus, behind the Speaker of the House, unlike the Senate Majority Leader. The annual legislative schedule, the timing of legislation for consideration, and committee activity are all under the Majority Leader's purview.
What are the majority leader's responsibilities?
The majority leader coordinates daily, monthly, and annual legislative strategies, schedules bills for consideration on the House floor, communicates with lawmakers to see how party members feel about topics, and strives to further the party's objectives.
To learn more about Senate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24779287
#SPJ4
As a first responder, you don't have much control over the lamp color or the type of light on your response vehicles — those decisions are made by the state and by _________ administrators.
The decisions about lamp color or the type of light on your response vehicles are made by the state and traffic incident management (TIM) administrators.
What is traffic incident management (TIM)?Traffic incident management (TIM) can be defined as a multi-disciplinary process that involves planning and coordinating vehicles and road users (pedestrians), so as to efficiently and effectively detect, respond and clear any traffic incident on the road.
The main purpose of the traffic incident management (TIM) is to ensure and safely restore continuous traffic flow as quickly as possible and to make decisions about lamp color or the type of light on a responder's vehicle.
Read more on traffic flow here: https://brainly.com/question/24555108
Which of the following are true of criminal cases?
- Those convicted in criminal cases may face a fine, imprisonment, or both as punishment.
- Criminal cases involve violation of a penal law.
- The state initiates the action against the accused.
- Criminal cases deal primarily with individual or property rights.
Answer:
Those convicted in criminal cases may face a fine, imprisonment, or both as punishment.Criminal cases involve violation of a penal law.The state initiates the action against the accused.Discribe how the following concepts could help to fight social challenges :social and environmental responsibility
Social and environmental responsibility can combat social concerns by contributing in their resolution. When an individual or a group takes on the responsibility of protecting society and the environment, it can help to alleviate social problems. Many people and corporations, for example, organize food drives to combat poverty. Economic activities grow in a stable community with a good environmental atmosphere, which is why social and environmental responsibility may help fight poverty.
Environmental and social responsibility considers issues of people, planet, and profit that contribute to long-term competitive advantage. Developing socially responsible and sustainable employment practices assists companies in meeting current demands while preserving their potential to fulfil future requirements.
To learn more about Environmental, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/21976584
#SPJ4
Do you think Americans have too much or too little freedom of speech? Explain
Answer: Hell no, there’s no such thing as too much freedom. While we’re the freest country in the world there’s still not enough freedom in America.
A brief summary of each source, analyzing any central ideas or information
In what ways were the primary and secondary sources the same and in what ways were they different?
How did you know each source was credible?
How did the tone and language differ between them?
How were the structures of each source different?
Did the point of view differ among the sources and if so, how?
How was each type useful?
Answer:
answers below ^^
Explanation:
1. primary and secondary sources are:
difference: one(primary) is from a person who has first hand been there or experienced it
secondary is information that has been maybe guessed or estimated or passed down from people (it can get twisted sometimes also it really comes from people who weren't there so its secondary info)
similar: they both give pieces of evidence on a topic it can be on any subject
2. if the information was there is reliable source or talked with a person who has experienced it
3. one was original the other was maybe secondary/ traditionally passed down and it could have changed
4. one might be more different then the other and maybe has other info not known about
5. they could have been in different places (ex of a primary source. lets say a man from the British war going against patriots survived and is still living they talked about how it was the patriots fault and lets say a patriot survived and they said how it was the British fault then it could be hard to find out who's fault it was unless we had more sources) (ex of secondary. lets say a man survived and is still alive from the British war on the patriots side and lets say a young man was told by people that it was no ones fault yet the patriot man said it was the British fault (lets say it was) who would you believe the man who was there or a kid who was told by people who where not there when that war happened )
6. the primary and secondary sources are useful because you can compare and contrast them
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft,
coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of
choice?
A. Capital
B. Profits
C. Resources
D. Wages
Hello and Good Morning/Afternoon
Original Question: Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft, coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice?
Let's consider all the choices:
Capital: is a financial asset usually given to help start a company or invest in a company. This doesn't protect against theft, fraud, or coercion as its purpose is to help start not to protect a companyProfits: it is the money made by the company. However, that doesn't protect a company as it only makes a company more vulnerable to theft as dishonest people will find the company more attractive to take advantage of.Resources: by having resources, the companies have ways to evade criminals as they have ways and connections to use their profit and capital and their workers to move past the dangerWages: is the payment made to the workers for their service. This doesn't protect the company as its purpose is to only pay their workers for their service, not to protect the company.Answer: Resources
Hope that helps!
#LearnwithBrainly
The brokerage relationship that is presumed to exist is
Answer:
what is that or something
Answer:
Transaction broker
Explanation:
which type e of dispute resolution allows for a board or other group to make ? - Negotiations Conciliation - Arbitration Trial
Answer: Arbitration Trial
Explanation:
A "whistleblower" is a person who
O is a person who serves in the position of an ombudsman
O brings to public attention gross governmental inefficiency or illegal action.
O is hired in excess of the true labor requirements of an agency
O does not accomplish his or her tasks by the end of a day
A "whistleblower" is a person who brings to public attention gross governmental inefficiency or illegal action, as shown in the second option.
Why is "whistleblower" important?Because it announces information that the public needs to know.Because it shows that politicians act abusively.Because it monitors pockets of government corruption.
The actions of politicians and branches of government are not always established honestly and correctly. when this happens, the population is the most affected, as it is unable to maintain its rights and has the resources necessary for a good life reduced.
In this case, in democratic countries that reinforce the sovereignty of the people, people must know about inefficient projects and illegal behavior that are being established in the government so that the people can demand a solution.
For this to happen, someone must call the attention of the people to the government's problems. This person must possess strong observational skills that will enable him to monitor the government's actions and the behavior of its members.
That person is the "whistleblower."
Learn more about government corruption:
https://brainly.com/question/2343781
#SPJ1
unhappy with the decision passed by a lower court in a civil rights violation case, anastasia files her case with the united states supreme court, hoping that the court will take it up for review. in this case, the supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case. select one: a. writ of habeas corpus b. writ of mandamus c. writ of certiorari d. writ of mens rea
The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
What is writ of certiorari?
This is a request that the Supreme Court can order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. In this if atleast 4 judges hear the case it will be heard and discussed. It can be applied by any member of public.
Sometimes it is also called as judicial Writ. It can be granted when amounts to abuse of discretion or lack or excess of jurisdiction. It cab be granted in any civil, criminal or judicial cases.
Hence, The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about writ of certiorari from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/12106865
#SPJ4
Which statement would the author of the passage most
likely agree with?
Passage:
3. The Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act brought the law up to date with current technology, so we no longer have to fight a digital-age battle with antique weapons-legal authorities leftover from the era of rotary telephones. When investigating the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, for example, law enforcement used one of the Act's new
authorities to use high-tech means to identify and locate
some of the killers.
-"The USA PATRIOT Act:
Preserving Life and Liberty,"
Department of Justice
✓ The Patriot Act is essential to the United States'
efforts to combat terrorism.
O The Patriot Act is essential to the United States'
efforts to combat war.
O The Patriot Act is needed to help the United States
protect privacy rights.
O The Patriot Act is needed to help the United States
protect suspects' rights.
A is the correct answer! :)
Answer:
THANK YOU IF IT IS "A"....<3333
Explanation:
According to the passage, the correct option is A. The Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism.
The passage states that the Patriot Act updated the law to reflect new technologies and new threats. The Act was reportedly used to look into the killing of Wall Street Journal writer Daniel Pearl, according to the document. This implies that the Patriot Act is a powerful weapon in the battle against terrorism in the author's eyes.
Therefore, the author of the passage would most likely agree with the statement that the Patriot Act is essential to the United States' efforts to combat terrorism. Hence, Option A. is correct.
Learn more about the Patriot Act, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11306077
#SPJ5
Michael, a 25-year-old man, has committed serious felonies such as arson, assault, and battery. An analysis of his personality suggests that he has some inherent negative traits that make him extremely aggressive and violent. The trait theories state that criminal behavior is not the result of a person choosing to commit a crime, but rather that of the traits with which the person is born. If the trait theory is correct, what type of punishment does Michael deserve? What do you think are the implications for punishment for those who break the law? Provide reasoning for your answers.
Answer:
Although Michael broke the law from Negative Traits, Micheal is still responsible for his actions, he knows from right from wrong. Therfore charges should stand.
Explanation:
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D