what is the value of case law on legal research​

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4

While appellate courts issue various types of opinions, a "judgment" is not considered a separate type of opinion. Here option D is the correct answer.

An appellate court is a court of law that hears appeals from lower courts or administrative agencies. When an appellate court reviews a case, it may issue an opinion, which is a written explanation of its decision. The opinion may be written by one judge or by a panel of judges who hear the case together.

Of the four options provided, a "judgment" is not a type of opinion that can be issued by an appellate court. A judgment is a final decision or ruling in a case, which may include an opinion explaining the reasoning behind the decision, but it is not considered a separate type of opinion.

On the other hand, the three other options listed are all types of opinions that appellate courts may issue. A "majority" opinion is the opinion of the majority of the judges on the panel who heard the case.

A "plurality" opinion is an opinion issued when no single opinion received the support of a majority of the judges, but a larger number of judges agreed with one opinion than any other. A "concurring" opinion is written by a judge who agrees with the outcome of the case but for different reasons than those stated in the majority opinion.

To learn more about appellate courts

https://brainly.com/question/30962544

#SPJ4

Because of the high volume of interstate highway traffic, special care must be taken when changing lanes or pulling over on or along the side of the road. This is especially true when considering the high speeds at which many drivers are traveling.

Drivers should only execute lane changes or pull overs to avoid hazards ahead and with adequate warning to other drivers. Failure to do so could result in serious accidents or fatalities. It is important for all drivers to remain alert and vigilant while on the road, and to always prioritize safety over convenience.

To read more about speeds click here

https://brainly.com/question/15837674

#SPJ11

The type of sentence that an offender receives if he has been convicted of two or more crimes but his prison sentence is considered complete once the longest single term has been served is called concurrent sentences.

A concurrent sentence is when a convict who has been found guilty of more than one offence receives a sentence that is the length of the most severe charge, with the other sentences served simultaneously or concurrently. As a result, the sentences will be served concurrently, with only the longest sentence being enforced.An example of concurrent sentencing is when a person is convicted of two crimes and is given a prison term of 10 years for one crime and 5 years for another. If the judge orders a concurrent sentence, the person would only serve ten years rather than fifteen, since both sentences will be served concurrently.

To learn more about prison, visit: https://brainly.com/question/28719680

#SPJ11

Answer:

intermingling the principal's funds or property with the agent's own accounts or possessions.

Explanation:

The last year there was a surplus in the actual U.S. federal budget was in 2001.

The budget surplus occurs when the government's revenues are higher than its expenditures. During the late 1990s, the U.S. government had a string of budget surpluses, largely due to the booming economy and fiscal discipline measures that were put in place.

In 2001, the U.S. federal budget had a surplus of $127 billion, marking the fourth consecutive year of budget surpluses. However, the surplus was short-lived. The following years saw a series of events, including the economic downturn following the bursting of the dot-com bubble, increased military spending due to the 9/11 attacks, and the implementation of tax cuts, which contributed to a reversal in the budgetary situation. From 2002 onwards, the U.S. federal budget returned to running deficits, resulting in a significant accumulation of national debt over subsequent years.

In addition to the increased spending, the economy also went into a recession in 2001, which further decreased government revenues. As a result, the U.S. government has run budget deficits every year since 2001, with the exception of 2015. Overall, the 2001 surplus was a notable achievement for the U.S. government, but it was short-lived due to a combination of factors such as increased spending, tax cuts, military operations, and an economic downturn.

Know more about Budget surplus here :

https://brainly.com/question/29786573

#SPJ11

The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.

Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.

While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.

Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27571970

#SPJ1

The significance of the Wagner Act to organized labor was that it provided strong government protection for unions.

What Is the Wagner Act?

The Wagner Act forbids unfair labor practices by private sector employers and grants workers the ability to form unions, go on strikes, and bargain for benefits, working conditions, and compensation. The following are some essential details concerning this legislation:

To learn more about  Wagner Act visit;

https://brainly.com/question/25970080

#SPJ4

Answer:

B. emergence of bad government.

Explanation:

If people with integrity fail to participate in politics, it leaves people without integrity. If a politician does not have integrity, the government will begin to become corrupt, which will ultimately led to the emergence of bad government.

Answer:

Explanation:

When people with integrity fail to participate in politics, it leads to the emergence of bad government (option B). This is because when individuals with high moral principles and values do not get involved in the political process, it can create a vacuum that may be filled by individuals who lack integrity, and who may be more interested in advancing their own interests rather than serving the public good. This can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including corruption, abuse of power, and a general erosion of trust in government institutions. By contrast, when individuals with integrity are actively engaged in politics, it can help to promote positive political development, including increased transparency, accountability, and a greater emphasis on ethical behavior and public service.

Yes law is law. The importance of law in agriculture is that it serves as a guideline for labour laws, immigration laws, international trade, FSSAI regulation, environmental issues, organisational issues, investment issues, and so on.  The importance of law in ethics is to uphold the honour and dignity of the legal sphere.

Agribusiness is an important industry that includes all aspects of agriculture, from basic farming to productive resources, agricultural commodities, and facilitative services. Land laws, labour laws, intellectual property laws, international trade laws, food safety, and environmental laws are just a few of the concerns that entities functioning in the sphere contend with.

Both ethics and law address issues of right and evil and promote social cooperation. Through legislation, society's ethical principles become law, and we frequently link obeying the law with being ethically correct.

Learn more about law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30149053

#SPJ4

Answer: Any case where the crime is believed to have occurred

Explanation:

you didn't include the options but sexual abuse is a crime therefore it should always be reported.

Answer:

1. Book Prink Auditors of public companies must retain all audit or review work papers for seven years or face the threat of a prison term for willful violations.

2. Corporate executives who personally certify financial statements that are fraudulently misstated may be fined and/or imprisoned.

3.  Lead audit partners are required to rotate every seven years.

Explanation:

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)

SOX has several requirements to improve corporate governance and financial reporting.

Retention of audit work papers, auditors of public companies must keep their audit or review work papers for seven years to ensure transparency and accountability.

Accountability of corporate executives, executives who certify fraudulent financial statements risk fines and imprisonment, highlighting the need of correct reporting.

Lead audit partners are rotated, to guarantee independence and objectivity, the primary auditors who oversee corporate audits must change every seven years.

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

When we refer to a holding, we rightly talk about the determination of a matter of law by the court which is based on the issues that are brought forward in that particular case.  

It is also the same as a decision in court made by the judge which is the judge’s opinion that has discussion of facts, issues and law.  

Answer:

I would assume

"The Executive Branch". Can you give the drop down options so I can answer the next one?

Explanation:

Answer:

First Box: Executive

Second Box: Congressional, or The Advisors.

Explanation:

The reason I say congressional because it is made into 2 Section the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Presidential Level, doesn't really have two, but he can have 2 Advisers

Answer:

Bow. It is characterized in that it lacks deltas and its crests run from one side to the other without turning back on themselves.

Internal loop. It is characterized by having a delta to the right of the observer; the papillary crests that form the nucleus are born on the left, run to the right, turning on themselves, to come out on the same side as the starting point.

External clip. It is characterized by having a delta to the observer's left, the papillary ridges that form the nucleus are born on the right and run to the left, turning on themselves, to come out on the same side as the starting point.

Whorl. It is characterized in that it has two deltas, one on the right and one on the left; their nuclei adopt ovoid destrogyrate or synestrogyre spiroidal shapes, concentric ovoid circles concentric in S or in Z.

The null hypothesis should be rejected because the critical value is less than the calculated Value correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05

A chi-square test is defined as a statistically significant difference between the expected and observed frequencies.

The chi-square test uses hypothetical facts to determine significant differences between calculated and observed frequencies.

The null hypothesis is rejected because the squared value is less than the first found statistic or calculated value. Therefore the hypothesis is invalid.

To learn more about ‘null hypothesis’, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

A researcher observed that when two heterozygous plants with red flowers are crossed the resulting offspring include plants with red white or pink flower. The researcher proposes the null hypothesis that flower color is the result of independent assortment and incomplete dominance. The researcher calculates a chi square value of 7.3. Assuming two degrees of freedom which of the following is the correct interpretation of the chi square analysis using a p value of 0.05?

Answer:

A political debate is a confrontation of ideas between two or more candidates for a certain position, where both try to convince the electorate to vote for them. Electoral debates, such as the one recently held between President Trump, candidate of the Republican Party, and Joe Biden, candidate of the Democratic Party, are especially important.

To determine who is the candidate who has best developed his performance in the debate, the power of conviction that this has had in front of the voters must be evaluated, as well as the dominance of the debated topics and, especially, his prevalence against the other candidate on the discussed issues.

The performance of a candidate in a debate can be evaluated based on the power of conviction and the dominance that a candidate has over others.

In conclusion, the performance of a candidate can be evaluated based on how much candidate was able to convince the electorates.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/13674408

Alcohol impaired drivers found guilty Men are more likely than females to drive after using drugs, yet both sexes who suffer fatal injuries are equally likely to test positive for drugs.

According to the Road Traffic Act, your insurance company must cover the costs of third parties' claims if you cause an accident while driving over the limit. A lot of insurance firms will then try to recoup these expenses from the policyholder, so beware.

the ten most frequent causes of failing a driving test were as follows: Not looking adequately at junctions. Failure to check mirrors when changing direction. At intersections, poor posture is used when turning right onto the road.

To know more about Alcohol  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28810778

#SPJ1

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

it is still against the law to smoke marijuana so they will have to testify anyway

Answer:

yes they should

Explanation:

a psychologist should be able to give an expert opinion on sanity because they study the mind or mental states. This means that they know what is takes to be insane or sane.

The role of bureaucratic agencies on federal policy making and budget making that they are policy making institutions.

About federal policy

Public policy is a term used to describe activities made by any branch of the United States federal govt, including laws, rules, regulations, presidential orders, & legal precedents.

The Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces and the head of state and the govt of the USA are the President. According to Article 2 of the Constitution, the President is in charge of carrying out and upholding the laws passed by Congress.

Over 30,000 legislation have been passed by Congress since 1789, with an average of 200–600 being passed every one of its 115 biannual sessions.

To know more about federal policy:

brainly.com/question/360779

#SPJ4

State sovereignty is both essential to the functioning of the United Nations and a significant hinderance for its potential efficacy.

It acts as the foundation for UN values and principles, as it affords members the right to self-determination, independence, freedom, and the right to promote their own interests. However, the very notion of state sovereignty restricts the UN from acting and responding to global challenges in a unified and decisive manner.

As sovereignty is limited only to the state, it makes it difficult for the UN to exercise collective will, as members may not be willing to make collective decisions in the face of intervention and sovereignty infringements. This lack of cohesion creates a paradox between the nations and the UN, as state sovereignty is the prerequisite for the UN to exist, yet serves as a major barrier to its effectiveness.

To know more about State sovereignty , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28386639

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:

"Proximate cause is established when the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's harm, and when the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct."

This statement encapsulates the two main elements of proximate cause: causation and foreseeability. Causation requires that the defendant's actions were a substantial factor in causing the harm suffered by the plaintiff, while foreseeability requires that the harm suffered by the plaintiff was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct.

Together, these elements help to establish whether the defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is the "but-for" test. This test determines whether, "but for" the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred.

The "but-for" test is a legal standard used to determine whether a defendant's actions caused the plaintiff's injuries. To satisfy the test, it must be established that, "but for" the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred. In other words, the defendant's actions must be the direct, proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. This is often established by proving that the plaintiff's injuries were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant at the time of their actions. This standard must be met in order for a plaintiff to successfully recover damages from a defendant. Overall, the "but-for" test is an essential standard used to determine if a defendant is responsible for a plaintiff's injuries.

Here you can learn more about  plaintiff's injuries https://brainly.com/question/27463491]

#SPJ11

Answer:Plurality voting is an electoral system in which each voter is allowed to vote for only one. cases however, a structured ballot can also include space for a write-in candidate. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. im in law too!!!!

Explanation:

the answer is true explanation my uncle's an attorney

Answer:

a

Explanation: it makes sense

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1