What was a Northern advantage during the Civil War?
O fighting on home terrain
O having more mobile armies
O having more experienced soldiers and leaders
o having more railroads and factories

Answer:

Low inflation Consumers deferring purchases

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Clotee keeps her knowledge a secret, even from Aunt Tee, revealing her skills only in her journal she keeps hidden in the woods. When Mr. Harms (Mark Ellis), William’s tutor, tells Clotee he knows her secret, she fears the worst. But later, she spies Mr. Harms in the woods aiding a well-known abolitionist. Everyone’s loyalty is put to the test when Mr. Harms’ motives are betrayed, but some quick thinking by Clotee saves the day.

I REALLY HOPE THIS HELPED!

PLEASE MRAK ME AS brilliant ONLY IF YOU WANT !

Answer:

Isolationist Foreign Policy: Isolationism is an approach to foreign policy where a nation or state seeks to minimize its involvement in international affairs and limit its diplomatic and military relations with other countries. Isolationists often oppose foreign intervention, economic and cultural ties, and the spread of international law and institutions.

Interventionist Foreign Policy: Interventionism is an approach to foreign policy where a nation or state seeks to actively intervene in international affairs and increase its diplomatic and military relations with other countries. Interventionists often support foreign intervention, economic and cultural ties, and the spread of international law and institutions.

Answer:

It can cause intense competition among nations with each seeking to overpower the other.

Explanation:

Answer:

I think the correct answer is A

Answer:

Here ya go!

Explanation:

The Magna Carta limited the power of the king by limiting the extent of his power over the people. He was not allowed anymore to take a nobleman's freedom without proper judicial procedure, he could no longer impose new taxes without consent of Parliament and he had to respect the rights and properties of the Church...

Hope it helps!

OwO

Answer:

Explanation:

For centuries Magna Carta has stood for the principle that no man is above the law, not even a king. Although King John’s Magna Carta does not explicitly articulate this idea, it did create checks designed to restrain the king whenever he failed to uphold the terms of the charter. Chapter 61 of King John’s Magna Carta stipulates that twenty-five barons should be selected to ensure that the king upholds all of the provisions of the charter. When the king is in violation, the barons have the authority to seize the king’s properties by military force—or “distrain” him—until he complies.

This provision was left out of later reissues of Magna Carta, but the memory of the barons’ threat of military force against the king made Magna Carta a symbol of the supremacy of the law over the will of the king. What also remained was the understanding that any act by the king or one of his agents that violated the terms of the charter was void, and, in the language of Edward I’s 1297 Confirmation of the Charters, “should be undone and holden for naught.”

For the framers of the United States Constitution, the checks and balances that operated between the three branches of government were a means to prevent any single branch of the government from governing capriciously. Despite the danger that any of the branches might attempt to overreach its enumerated powers, Magna Carta remains to the present day an especially potent symbol for those seeking to limit the powers of the executive branch of the government.

Hope I helped you!

The south seceded from the United States for a variety of reasons, but the underlying cause was the issue of slavery. Slavery had been a contentious issue for decades, but it came to a head in the mid-19th century as the north and south held vastly different opinions on the morality and necessity of the institution.

The southern states felt that their way of life was threatened by the north's growing abolitionist movement, which aimed to end slavery altogether.

The south believed that their economy and social structure were built on the backs of enslaved individuals, and that any attempt to disrupt that system would lead to their ruin.
Additionally, the south felt that the federal government was overstepping its bounds by attempting to limit the spread of slavery into new territories.

They believed that each state should have the right to decide whether or not they would allow slavery within their borders, without interference from the federal government.
These tensions ultimately led to the secession of several southern states, and the formation of the Confederate States of America. The Civil War broke out in 1861 as a result of these secessions and the underlying issues of slavery and states' rights.

For more such questions on slavery

https://brainly.com/question/28000673

#SPJ11

Answer:

I believe D.) Checks and balances should be the answer here.

Explanation:

In the Federalist Paper, James Madison talks about and defends the checks and balances system in the Constitution.

Answer:

D. Checks and balances

Explanation:

Checks and balances are the constitutional means referred to in Federalist Paper No. 51.

Answer:

E. Most colonists in GA supported Great Britain

Explanation:

There may be more answers, but I know that E is definitely one. Hope this helps somewhat!

Answer:

A,C,D,E

Explanation:

At the time of US-Spain,war in april 1898,President of united states was William McKinely.

Spanish-American war, (1898), struggle between the US and Spain that finished Spanish pilgrim rule in the Americas and brought about U.S. procurement of domains in the western Pacific and Latin America.

The war started in the Cuban battle for freedom from Spain, which started in February 1895. The Cuban struggle was damaging to U.S. interests in the island, which were assessed at $50 million, and nearly finished U.S. exchange with Cuban ports, typically esteemed at $100 million yearly. On the guerilla side, the conflict was pursued to a great extent against property and prompted the obliteration of sugarcane and sugar plants.

William McKinley Jr. was brought into the world in 1843 in Niles, Ohio, the seventh of nine offspring of William McKinley Sr. furthermore, Nancy (née Allison) McKinley. The McKinleys were of English and Scots-Irish plunge and had gotten comfortable western Pennsylvania in the eighteenth hundred years

To know more about president,visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/23963476

#SPJ4

The chronological order of these events is: Passage of the Stamp Act, Creation of the Proclamation Line, and Boston Massacre.

In chronological order, the correct sequence of events is as follows:

1. Passage of the Stamp Act: The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament in 1765. It imposed taxes on various printed materials in the American colonies, such as newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards. This act was met with significant resistance from the colonists, who saw it as an infringement on their rights.

2. Boston Massacre: On March 5, 1770, tensions between British soldiers and colonists in Boston escalated into violence, resulting in the Boston Massacre. British soldiers fired into a crowd of protestors, killing five colonists. This event further fueled anti-British sentiment and helped to unite the colonists against British rule.

3. Creation of the Proclamation Line: In 1763, following the end of the French and Indian War, the Proclamation Line was created by the British government. This line prohibited colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains, in an attempt to avoid conflicts with Native American tribes. The colonists saw this as another form of control and restriction by the British government.

Know more about the Stamp Act

https://brainly.com/question/17891017

#SPJ11

Answer:

D

Explanation:

It were the times of nationalism in europe(Italy, Germany etc.), I highly doubt that it wouldn't be that.

Answer:

1922-1943 (Post World War 1, Great Depression, World War 2)

Explanation:

That was the era of fascism in Italy and was developed by Benito Mussolini the absolute dictator.

World War II

Explanation:

Some of the things that Roosevelt requested from business leaders in exchange for adopting an antideflation program were:

An antideflation program refers to any policy that aims to reverse the general rise in prices and instead either tries to stabilize prices or to lead to them falling. When Roosevelt took over as president, the country was seeing a period of inflation and yet poor economic growth and so there were calls to implement an antideflation program.

However, this meant that businesses would not benefit from higher prices and so they lobbied against it. Roosevelt got them to agree wot increase the incomes of their workers should prices rise and to allow workers to collective bargain for wages, and other benefits, if he was not to implement such a program.

Options for this question include:

Find out more on Roosevelt at https://brainly.com/question/9351624

#SPJ1

Answer:

The government felt the need to encourage women to enter the workforce

Explanation:

I took the test and got it right

Answer:

1. Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)

2. Berkeley Free Speech Movement

Explanation:

The examples of antiwar student movements during the 1960s are:

1. Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)

2. Berkeley Free Speech Movement

The above assertion is evident in the fact that Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was established in the 1960s as a national student activist organization in the United States. The group aims to stand against the principles of continual leaders, hierarchical relationships, and parliamentary procedure. They also go against the issue of the Vietnam war while supporting Black power.

Similarly, the Berkeley Free Speech Movement was a student protest group established in the 1960s. The group protested many things, including the ban of on-campus political activities, the student's right to free speech and academic freedom, and other civil rights movement activities and anti-Vietnam war movement.

Answer:

First and second option

Explanation:

Edge 2020

The summary of an article ends with a conclusion. Conclusion helps in completing an article.

The final paragraph of an article should have a conclusion that restates the thesis. The conclusion section should restate your argument, underline the key points that supported it throughout the research, and offer any final observations you may have regarding the subject at hand.

The conclusion gives you the opportunity to make a final statement about the topics you've discussed in your paper, to summarize your views, to highlight their significance, and to nudge your audience toward a fresh understanding of the subject.

To know more about summary, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/24839707

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is 15 weeks.

Explanation:

They ranged from untidy to absolutley filthy, according to a study in 1917. In 1900, 78% of all children were enrolled in American Schools; By 1910 the percentage had increased only slightly to 79%. In 1905 the average school term lasted 151 days, to which the average student attended 105 days. And 105 divided by 7 is 15.

Answer:

15 weeks

Explanation:

just to keep it short :) hope it helps? Brainlyest?

Answer:

C

Explanation:

fidel is in Cuba the others were around Nixon's location

Answer:

Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes, because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens. The colonists started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods.

Answer:

They didn’t object to paying taxes. They objected to not having a say in determining what the taxes would be.

Explanation:

Early settlers in America fled from persecution due to economic, religious, and political reasons. They considered it unjust that they were required to pay taxes without being represented as former subjects of a constitutional monarchy. Later came to be the adage "No taxes without representation."

So, what was "No taxes without representation?"

It had its beginnings in the British Isles in the 17th century, a time of great political unrest and several conflicts, like a lot of contemporary American political thought.

The English Parliament passed the Bill of Rights in 1689 as justification for overthrowing King James II and installing his daughter Mary II and son-in-law William III in his place. It outlined its reasoning for deposing James and instituted new regulations. It stated:

"the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavor to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;...

...By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament."

It then declares, "for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties"

The Bill of Rights essentially seeks to strike a balance between the authority of the Crown (now the Prime Minister and Cabinet, formerly the King and/or Queen) and that of Parliament. It clearly states that Parliament has the right to impose taxes, not the Crown, and it proves that Parliament has the most power. [Fun fact: in an effort to tie the "crimes" of the British Government to what King James II was accused of, the US Declaration of Independence was modeled after the Bill of Rights.]

The political reasoning behind this was convoluted, but nearly a century later, when British-American colonists were defending their position on independence, this "ancient right and/or liberty"—which wasn't that old—was interpreted as a rule stating that only a Parliament—representing the people—could impose taxes. Additionally, the British Parliament had no authority to collect taxes on the American colonies since they had no direct representation in that body (the English and Scottish Parliaments amalgamated into one British Parliament in 1707).

Obviously, the Bill of Rights does not say that, but it is simple to understand how it can be construed that way. They concentrated on what they regarded to be the underlying idea of the text rather than the actual phrase, which makes it obvious that Parliament has the authority to impose taxes (that only representatives could raise tax). Thus, the straightforward political adage "no taxation without representation" was born; if a government is going to tax you, you should have a voice in it (unless you were poor, a woman, not-white, from Washington DC etc.).

Like a lot of political slogans it is a simple way of expressing a much more complicated concept.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

ik bc I'm right thank you

Answer:

Taxation is the price which we pay for civilization, for our social, civil and political institutions, for the security of life and property, and without which, we must resort to the law of force.

Explanation:

1. According to French and Bell (1983) the desired outcomes of organizational development efforts are increased organizational effectiveness and health. Option A. 2. The sequence of the major phases of the organization development process is Diagnosis, action, and process maintenance. Option A. 3. Benchmarking. Option C. 4. Hiring of Maverick. Option B. 5. Preliminary feedback data. Option B.  6. Empowerment. Option D. 7. Community impact. Option C. 8. Simply gives facts. Option A.

1. According to French and Bell (1983), the desired outcomes of organizational development efforts are Increased organizational effectiveness and health. Option A.

2. The sequence of the major phases of the organization development process is Diagnosis, action, and process maintenance. Option A.

3. Benchmarking is a process of comparing and measuring an organization’s operations or processes against those of the best-in-practices in the industry. Option C.

4. The hiring of a maverick is an example of an internal cause of organizational change. Option B.

5. The stage in survey feedback, when the OD consultant meets with senior management to provide initial summary results, is called Preliminary feedback data. Option B.

6. According to Magginson and Banfield (1993), Empowerment is the process by which someone is enabled to achieve something. Option D.

7. Evaluating the effectiveness of TQM across products, services, and industries encompasses the following criteria except for Community impact. Option C.

8. Simply giving facts is not one of the aspects of information. According to French and Bell (1983), the desired outcomes of organizational development efforts are Increased organizational effectiveness and health. The sequence of the major phases of the organization development process is Diagnosis, action, and process maintenance. Option A.

Benchmarking is a process of comparing and measuring an organization’s operations or processes against those of the best-in-practices in the industry. The hiring of a maverick is an example of an internal cause of organizational change.

The stage in survey feedback, when the OD consultant meets with senior management to provide initial summary results, is called Preliminary feedback data.

According to Magginson and Banfield (1993), Empowerment is the process by which someone is enabled to achieve something. Evaluating the effectiveness of TQM across products, services, and industries encompasses the following criteria except for Community impact. Simply giving facts is not one of the aspects of information.

Read more about Benchmarking at https://brainly.com/question/32151345

#SPJ11

Answer:

Motivations for colonization: Spain's colonization goals were to extract gold and silver from the Americas, to stimulate the Spanish economy, and make Spain a more powerful country. Spain also aimed to convert Native Americans to Christianity.

Answer:

CLOWN EZ JUST FIGURE OUT LMA

Explanation:

EASY KID FREE POINTS