What were some rights that colonists expected as British citizens?
Answers
Answer:
Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.
Related Questions
ℑ , HELPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEEEEE
Answers
Answer:
I believe the answer is draft
Explanation:
can the negative impact of the mongol conquest on subject peoples be balanced by its positive impact? why or why not? if placed side by side on the scale, which way does the scale tip? please provide examples to defend your answers.
Answers
The negative impact of the Mongol conquest on subject peoples cannot be balanced by its positive impact.
While it is true that the Mongol Empire brought significant advancements in areas such as trade, communication, and infrastructure, the negative impact of the conquest on subject peoples far outweighs any potential benefits. The Mongol armies were notorious for their brutality and willingness to destroy entire cities and kill civilians. They also subjected conquered peoples to high taxes, forced labor, and other forms of oppression.
Furthermore, any positive impact of the Mongol conquest was short-lived and did not lead to lasting benefits for subject peoples. For example, while the Mongol Empire facilitated trade and communication across its vast territories, this was primarily done to serve the interests of the Mongols themselves, rather than to benefit local populations.
Given these factors, the negative impact of the Mongol conquest on subject peoples clearly outweighs any positive impact. While it is important to acknowledge the historical significance of the Mongol Empire and its contributions to human history, it is equally important to recognize the suffering and injustices inflicted upon conquered peoples.
To know more about Mongol conquest, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30648340
#SPJ4
What were characteristics of life in Athens but not in Sparta
(Select all correct answers)
A. Death in battle was considered the highest honor.
B. All citizens would vote on matters of concern to the state.
C. Art was considered a useless pastime.
D. Sea trade was important to the ecomony.
PLEASE HELP!!
Answers
Answer:
B and D
Explanation:
B: Athens was a democracy, Sparta was an oligarchy.
D: because Sparta was inland, they didn't have sea trade. Athens was a coastal city, so they had sea trade.
where did the harlem renaissance take place
Answers
The Harlem Renaissance was the social and artistic explosion that followed the early 20th-century development of the Harlem neighborhood in New York City as a Black cultural center.
Why did the Harlem Renaissance take place?The developments that had occurred in the African-American community after the end of slavery as well as the growth of communities in the North were the roots of the Harlem Renaissance.Due to World War I and the significant social and cultural changes that occurred in the United States in the early 20th century, these accelerated.African-American social philosophy and culture reached their height during the Harlem Renaissance, which was centered on the burgeoning African-American neighborhood of Harlem in New York City (USA).The Harlem Renaissance was a time in American history when the African American population experienced a creative explosion in the fields of art, music, and literature.The Harlem Renaissance, centered in New York City's Harlem, began roughly at the conclusion of World War I.To learn more about Harlem Renaissance refer,
https://brainly.com/question/874861
#SPJ4
The Harlem Renaissance was the social and creative boom that followed the early 20th-century emergence of the Harlem area in New York City as a Black cultural centre.
Why did the Harlem Renaissance take place?The Harlem Renaissance was a period in American history from the 1920s and 1930s. During this time, many African-Americans migrated from the South to Northern cities, seeking economic and creative opportunities. Within their communities creative expression became an outlet for writers, musicians, artists, and photographers, with a particular concentration in Harlem, New York.The changes that had occurred in the African-American community since the end of slavery as well as the growth of communities in the North were the roots of the Harlem Renaissance. Due to World War I and the significant social and cultural changes that occurred in the United States in the early 20th century, these accelerated.Jean Toomer, Jessie Fauset, Claude McKay, James Weldon Johnson, Alain Locke, Eric D. Walrond, Zora Neale Hurston, and Langston Hughes were some of the key figures of the literary Harlem Renaissance.To learn more about refer :
https://brainly.com/question/874861
#SPJ4
What were the main principles of transcendentalism, and how did they differ from the beliefs of most protestant christians?.
Answers
The main principles of transcendentalism were embracing mortal passion and they sought profound perception into the mystifications of actuality.
They contrasted from Protestant Christians because their beliefs were not as religious and they allowed of God as a single numeric rather than being a father, son and etc
More principles :These all echo the major principles of transcendentalism freethinking, tone reliance and nonconformity, growth and renewal of the existent, rebellion against tradition and established institutions, civil defiance, fellowship of man, nature and spiritual concinnity, and educational reform.
What's transcendentalism ?Transcendentalism is a ideology started in the early 19th century that promotes intuitive, unsubstantial thinking instead of scientific thinking grounded on material effects. Any of various doctrines that suggest to discover the nature of reality by probing the process of study rather than the things of sense experience the doctrines of Kant, Hegel, and Fichte are exemplifications of transcendentalism
Learn more about Transcendentalism :
brainly.com/question/2404367
#SPJ4
Because the framers of the US Constitution were concerned about citizens having too much power, they
A)banned citizens from voting.
B)organized a system of consuls and magistrates.
C)established a republic.
D)created a system of independently governed city-states
Answers
Answer:
c established a republic
Explanation:
Today you are going to be working with Pulitzer or Hearst reporting about the war in 1898. You will come up with an exciting headline along with facts (must be one of the three points that caused the Americans to get into the war) and fabrications to increase your readers during 1898.
Exciting Headline-
Facts supporting your headline
Picture to support your information
Answers
Answer:
Help please !!
Explanation:
A.
executed citizens for crimes against the government.
B.
exerted its authority over citizens with military force.
C.
allowed state laws to supersede federal law.
D.
brought charges of treason against US citizens.
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:i got it right
Answer:
Explanation:
Yeah A
which one will it be ?
Answers
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Neville Chamberlain - Savior of the Nation or Fool of the Decade?
The Munich Agreement was signed on 29 September 1938, by Britain, France, Italy and Germany. It was an agreement that allowed Hitler to annex the Sudetenland, which was part of Czechoslovakia. Hitler had demanded the Sudetenland as it was home to 3 million ethnic Germans. It is seen as a failure of the policy of appeasement. Neville Chamberlain aimed to achieve European peace by appeasing Hitler. By appeasement he meant negotiating with Hitler's reasonable demands in return for concessions. In September 1938 Hitler had claimed "The Sudetenland is the last problem that must be solved in Europe and it will be solved. It is the last territorial claim which I have to make in Europe." Was this the bait that lured Chamberlain to Munich? The Munich conference to discuss the future of the Sudetenland was not attended by Czechoslovakia or the USSR. Hitler's view of the Munich Agreement was that it was "an undreamt-of triumph, so great that you can scarcely imagine it." Chamberlain told cheering crowds, "My good
friends there has come back from Germany to Downing Street peace with
honour. I believe it is peace for our time". He believed that the peace of Europe would be guaranted by a peice of paper, signed by Hitler and himself, promising the two countries would not resort to war in the future."His views were echoed by the Daily Express who opined, "People of Britain, your children are safe. Your husbands and your sons will not march to war. Peace is a victory for all mankind. if we must have a victor let us choose Chamberlain, for the Prime Minister's conquests are mighty and enduring - millions of happy homes and hearts relieved of their burden."Daily Express Sept 30 1938 However there were rumblings of dissent in Britain. In October 1938 Churchill offered his appraisal of Munich, "We have suffered a total defeat I think that you will find that in a
period of time Czechoslovakia will be engulfed in the Nazi regime. We have passed an awful milestone in our history. This is only the beginning of the reckoning." In December 1938 the Yorkshire Post offered this assessment of the policy of appeasement, "By repeatedly surrendering to force Chamberlain has encouraged aggression Our central contention, therefore, is that Mr
Chamberlain's policy has throughout been based on a fatal misunderstanding of the psychology of dictatorship." Was the Yorkshire Post right? Had Chamberlain underestimated Hitler. This is the view of the Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini, he is predicting how Hitler will treat Chamberlain at Munich. "As soon as Hitler sees that old man he will know that he has won the battle. Chamberlain is not aware that to present himself to Hitler in the uniform of a bourgeois pacifist and British parliamentarian is the equivalent of giving a wild beast a taste of blood."Mussolini, Sept.
Using the above extract, answer the following questions:
1. a)Was Chamberlain right to support British public opinion and to try to avoid war?
b) What arguments can be used to support Chamberlain's actions?
c) What arguments can be used to oppose Chamberlain's action?
d) Did everyone in Britain support Appeasement?
e) Was Britain wrong not to try and stop Hitler earlier?
f) Could the betrayal of the Czechoslovakia at Munich, September 1938, be justified?
g) Why did Chamberlain after signing the Munich Agreement say, “This is peace of our time?”
f)In your own opinion, was Chamberlain the Savior of a nation or fool of the decade? Use facts to explain your answer with events after the Munich agreement.
2. Why did Hitler want to take over Sudetenland?
3. The following is a cartoon representing the NAZI-SOVIET pact. Use it to answer the questions below:
a) Name the bride and the groom in this cartoon.
b) Why was it unlikely that a “marriage” or union between the two was unlikely to happen?
c) Why was the honeymoon between the two not going to last?
d) Explain why Hitler signed the Nazi-soviet Pact.
e) Explain why Stalin agreed to sign the Nazi-Soviet Pact.
f) Who is the fool in this marriage? Explain your answer.
g) In your own opinion why was this marriage not going to last? Explain your answer.
Answers
QUICK!! how was the compromise of 1850 different from the Missouri Compromise?
A. it greatly favored plantation farmers over factory workers.
B. it was designed to protect the rights of african americans
C. it gave new states the choice to accept or reject slavery
D. it attempted to give free states more power than slaves
Answers
The compromise of 1850 was different from the Missouri Compromise because it gave new states the choice to accept or reject slavery. The Option C is correct.
How was compromise of 1850 different from Missouri Compromise ?The Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise were both legislative acts aimed at addressing the issue of slavery in the United States, but they differed in several key ways.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 sought to maintain a balance between slave and free states by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, and prohibiting slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Territory north of the 36°30' parallel.
The Compromise of 1850, on the other hand, aimed to resolve the question of whether to allow slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. It admitted California as a free state, abolished the slave trade (but not slavery itself) in Washington D.C., and introduced a more stringent Fugitive Slave Act.
Read more about compromise of 1850
brainly.com/question/8165267
#SPJ1
Precis on the "Lynch Law in America"(1900) IDA B Wells and "The
Use of Violence Against Southern Blacks"(1900) Benjamin Tillman
Answers
The Lynch Law in America is a essay that was written by Ida B. Wells in 1900. In this essay, Wells examines the use of lynching as a means of social control and punishment against African Americans during the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States.
She also provides evidence and arguments against the notion that lynching was a response to criminal behavior and instead points out that many lynchings were carried out for no legitimate reason, and often targeted innocent individuals.
On the other hand, The Use of Violence Against Southern Blacks is a speech that was delivered by Benjamin Tillman in 1900. Tillman was a white supremacist and a political leader in the South who advocated for the disenfranchisement and subjugation of African Americans.
In his speech, Tillman makes use of racist and violent rhetoric to justify the use of violence against African Americans in order to maintain white supremacy in the region. He argues that the use of force is necessary to maintain social order and that African Americans are a threat to the social order due to their supposed inherent inferiority.
In summary, while Ida B. Wells's essay The Lynch Law in America exposes the injustice of lynching and argues for an end to this practice, Benjamin Tillman's speech The Use of Violence Against Southern Blacks promotes the use of violence as a means of enforcing white supremacy and preserving the racial hierarchy of the South.
Learn more about Law in America: https://brainly.com/question/29398287
#SPJ11
Question is attached in the image below
Answers
Answer:
grassland and savannah that borders the desert area of the Sahara
Explanation:
look it up :)
Which sentence correctly uses the superlative form of the adverb long? (1 point)
A: He worked more long of all the staff.
B: They worked longer of all in the month of May.
C: on Friday, he worked the longest of all.
D: She worked longest than everyone else.
Answers
Answer:
C: on Friday, he worked the longest of all.
Explanation:
The correct sentence that uses the superlative form of the adverb long is option C: "On Friday, he worked the longest of all."
The superlative form of the adverb long is "longest," and it is used to indicate that something or someone has the greatest length of time. In option A, the comparative form "more long" is used incorrectly. In option B, the comparative form "longer" is used instead of the superlative. In option D, the comparative form "longest" is used incorrectly, as it should be used to compare two things, not multiple things.
Hope that helps!
The legal definition of the composition of the prerevolutionary Third Estate included
A) everyone who was not a noble or member of the clergy.
B) the clergy.
C) the peasantry.
D) the nobility.
E) businessmen and artisans.
Answers
Answer:
A) everyone who was not a noble or member of the clergy
Explanation:
The other two estates were composed by the nobility and the clergy
which element of ""whole lotta love"" demonstrates psychedelic characteristics?
Answers
the breakdown, spacey section with stereo effects
5. On which continent would you find each of the following
locations?
3)20°S, 60°W
Answers
Answer:
The continent is South America
Choose at least five events from the list below.
Event Choices
Aum Shinrikyo attack
Australia independence
Chinese Civil War
Great Leap Forward
Greek Civil War
Hundred Flowers Campaign
India independence
International Monetary Fund created
Israel became a nation
Sept 11th, 2001 attacks
South Africa independence
The Long March
Tiananmen Square incident
Vietnam War
World Trade Organization founded
Having trouble deciding which to pick? Choose events that you think had the most impact on the world.
Write a summary paragraph for each of the five chosen events. Each paragraph should answer these questions:
What happened?
Where did it happen?
When did it happen?
Why did it happen?
Which of the S.P.R.I.T.E categories is it connected to?
How does it connect to other events on the timeline?
Select an image to represent each event. Include the images in your timeline.
Organize your illustrated timeline. You can do this in many different ways. Make sure it looks nice, is easy to read, and is checked for spelling and grammar!
SUM1 PLEASE IMA FAIL :(
Answers
Indian independence came about in 1947 as a result of many years of nonviolent opposition to British rule, led by Mohandas GANDHI and Jawaharlal Nehru. Prior to and following the subcontinent's division into India and Pakistan, there was extensive inter-communal violence.
Independence Day commemorates the British Empire's demise in 1947 and the birth of a free and independent India. It also commemorates the date when the Indian subcontinent was divided into Pakistan and India at midnight on August 14–15, 1947.
It explains to them how our nation freed itself from British rule, which is particularly remarkable. And speaking about sacrifices done for the nation by our freedom fighters. We do it for educational purposes as well as to teach our kids about our nation's past.
Learn more about India's independence here:
https://brainly.com/question/3897169
#SPJ1
What conditions surrounded the rise of totalitarianism in germany, italy, and the soviet union?.
Answers
Dictators, tyrants, racists, mass murderers, anti-intellectuals, depressives, and liars are the conditions surrounding the rise of totalitarianism in Germany, Italy, and the soviet union.
Totalitarianism is a form of government and political system that prohibits all opposition parties, prohibits individual and group opposition to the state and its claims, and exercises a very high degree of control and regulation of public and private life. . It is considered the most extreme and complete form of authoritarianism. In totalitarian states, political power is often held by autonomous governments, such as dictators and absolute monarchies, employing sweeping campaigns of propaganda spread by state-controlled mass media to control their citizens. there is The concept gained significant influence in Western political discourse during the Cold War.
Notable examples of totalitarian states are Italy under Benito Mussolini (1922-43), the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin (1924-53), and the Soviet Union under Adolf Hitler (1933-45). Nazi Germany, under the influence of the People's Republic of China. Mao Zedong (1949 – 76) and North Korea under the Kim Dynasty (1948).
Learn more about totalitarianism here: https://brainly.com/question/463275
#SPJ4
PLZ HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 20 POINTS FOR A CORRECT ANSWER Select all that apply.
Two routes to China included:
an all-water route to India
a land route across China
a combination land and water route
Answers
Answer:
Travelling to China from India or from other areas, were confined across the famous route known as the Silk Route or the Silk road. This involved transport of all merchandise, spices etc. The main route for this was land. People used to traverse across mountains by horses to reach to china. Caravans and other modes were also used at a later stage.
Another very important mode of transport was water which was also popular for maritime transport. There are references about Vasco Da Gama and others. So, all the options given here were applicable as an individual or consolidated case.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. A land route across China
C. a combination land and water route
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
evaluate the impact of the pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946
Answers
The Nazis propagated the concept of Aryan racial superiority, considering the Aryan race as the pinnacle of human evolution and asserting that other races, particularly the Jewish people, were inferior and posed a threat to the Aryan race. These pseudoscientific ideas were based on false theories and distorted interpretations of genetics, anthropology, and eugenics.
As a result of these beliefs, Nazi Germany implemented a systematic campaign to dehumanize, discriminate against, and ultimately eliminate the Jewish population. This campaign included policies such as the Nuremberg Laws, which stripped Jews of their citizenship and basic rights, and the establishment of ghettos and concentration camps where millions of Jews were imprisoned, tortured, and killed.
The impact on the Jewish nation was catastrophic. Six million Jews, along with millions of other individuals targeted by the Nazis, were systematically murdered in an attempt to fulfill the Nazi ideology of racial purity. Jewish communities were torn apart, families were separated, and the cultural and intellectual contributions of the Jewish people were suppressed and destroyed.
Furthermore, the pseudoscientific ideas of race propagated by Nazi Germany had long-lasting effects on the Jewish nation and the world. The trauma and loss experienced during the Holocaust continue to impact survivors and their descendants, shaping their identities, memories, and collective consciousness.
In the aftermath of World War II, the international community recognized the heinous crimes committed by Nazi Germany and established principles of human rights and equality to prevent the recurrence of such atrocities. The Nuremberg Trials held accountable those responsible for the Holocaust, and the Holocaust itself became a pivotal event in shaping global discussions on racism, discrimination, and genocide.
Overall, the impact of the pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946 was a dark chapter in history characterized by immense suffering, loss, and the realization of the dangers of pseudoscientific ideologies and racial prejudices.
PLEASE HELP AND FAST PLEASE HELP
describe an agreement that states might use to make their case that centralization is a bad thing. Include specific of centralization.
Answers
Answer:
is this an article?
Explanation: i can help if ik what article
Answer: Centralization refers to the hierarchical level within an organisation that has authority to make decisions. When decision making is kept at the top level, the organisation is centralized.
Explanation: Centralization or centralization is the process by which the activities of an organisation, particularly those regarding planning and decision-making, framing strategy and policies become concentrated within a particular geographical location group.
Which two events were causes of the American revolution?
A. The boston tea party
B. The French Revolution
C. The treaty of paris of 1768
D. The British occupation of Boston
Answers
who were australians and new zealanders closest to in the time between world war ii and the 1970s?
Answers
Between World War II and the 1970s, Australians and New Zealanders were closest to the United Kingdom and the United States.
This close relationship was primarily due to historical ties, military alliances, and shared cultural values. Australia and New Zealand were both part of the British Commonwealth, which fostered strong diplomatic and economic connections.
Additionally, both countries were members of the ANZUS Treaty, a security agreement established in 1951 with the United States.
This alliance allowed them to work together on various military and defense issues. Throughout this period, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and the US maintained strong diplomatic and trade relations, contributing to their continued closeness.
To know more about World War II refer here: https://brainly.com/question/8605481#
#SPJ11
The war hawks demanded war with Britain because they wanted to do all of the following except A) wipe out renewed Indian resistance. B) defend American rights. C) gain more territory. D) retaliate for the British burning of Washington, D.C. E) revenge the manhandling of American sailors.
Answers
The war hawks demanded war with Britain because they wanted to do all of the following except D) retaliate for the British burning of Washington, D.C.
The war hawks, a group of American politicians in the early 19th century, advocated for war with Britain during the War of 1812. They had several motivations for their stance, including wiping out renewed Indian resistance, defending American rights, gaining more territory, and seeking revenge for the manhandling of American sailors.
However, the specific objective of retaliating for the British burning of Washington, D.C., was not a primary reason for the war hawks' demand for war. While the burning of Washington, D.C., by the British during the war was a significant event, it was not the central focus or motivation for the war hawks' push for conflict with Britain.
The war hawks had multiple reasons for demanding war with Britain, including Indian resistance, American rights, territorial expansion, and seeking revenge for the mistreatment of American sailors. However, their primary objective did not revolve around retaliating for the British burning of Washington, D.C.
To know more about Britain, visit:
brainly.com/question/881774
#SPJ11
By entering into alliances with conquered people instead of forcing them to pay tribute, how did Rome benefit?
Answers
Explanation:
The Roman Empire began in 27 BCE when Augustus became the sole ruler of Rome.
Augustus and his successors tried to maintain the imagery and language of the Roman Republic to justify and preserve their personal power.
Beginning with Augustus, emperors built far more monumental structures, which transformed the city of Rome.
.Which most strongly influences consumers' nonmonetary considerations?A) advertisingB) government planningC) values and beliefsD) decreasing marginal utility
Answers
Answer: c. values and beliefs
Explanation:
Nền sản xuất mới ở châu âu bắt đầu từ những ngành nào?
Answers
Answer:
yes ofc right on spotless sweet bullseye
Explanation:
mwuahahajaahahahaahahahahaahahahahha
Identify three developments that led to the rise of the Scientific Revolution.
1.
2.
3.
Answers
Answer:
1. Improved classical language skills.
2. The promotion of mathematics.
3. The development of the printing press, telescope, microscope etc.
Explanation:
Improved classical language skills, the promotion of mathematics, and the development of the printing press, telescope, microscope, etc. are the three developments that led to the rise of the Scientific Revolution. The Scientific Revolution was a series of events that are responsible for the emergence of modern science when developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology (including human anatomy) and chemistry changed the views of society about nature.
according to dr. lee strobel, historical truth is not relevant or important to christianity. True or false?
Answers
according to dr. lee strobel, historical truth is not relevant or important to christianity. False.
The statement is false. Historical truth is indeed relevant and important to Christianity. Christianity is founded on the belief in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which are events rooted in history. The historical accuracy of these events is crucial to the foundational claims of Christianity.
Christianity asserts that Jesus Christ was a historical figure who lived in first-century Palestine, performed miracles, taught profound spiritual truths, and ultimately died on a cross for the redemption of humanity. The resurrection of Jesus, as a historical event, is considered central to Christian faith and is believed to validate the claims of Jesus as the Son of God and the source of salvation.
Many Christian scholars, theologians, and historians have devoted themselves to studying and researching the historical aspects of Christianity. They examine ancient texts, archaeological evidence, and historical context to better understand the life of Jesus and the early Christian movement.
While faith and personal belief play a significant role in Christianity, historical truth is still considered important to substantiate and support the faith. The study of historical evidence and the pursuit of historical truth help to provide a solid foundation for the Christian faith and its claims about Jesus and the events surrounding his life.
Therefore, it is incorrect to state that historical truth is not relevant or important to Christianity. On the contrary, historical truth is integral to the understanding and practice of the Christian faith.
To know more about Christian movement., click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10323175
#SPJ11