What would this be ? I’m overthinking it

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:The largest fraction is 5/8

The value of the car after 3 years is $79, 000

To determine the value, we have to use the formula;

Value = Initial value × (1 - Depreciation rate)ⁿ

Substitute the values given, we get;

Remaining value after 3 years = $100,000 × (1 - 0.10)³

Expand the bracket, we get;

Value after 3 years = $100,000 × (0.90)³

Find the cube value and substitute, we have;

Value after 3 years = $100,000 × 0.729

Multiply the values, we have;

Value after 3 years = $72,900

Learn more about depreciation at: https://brainly.com/question/1203926

#SPJ1

Mean: 34.125, Median: 31.5, Mode: 38

Mean: 19.222, Median: 18, No mode

Mean: 8.611, Median: 8, Mode: 8

Let's find the mean, median, and mode for each set of numbers:

Set: 40, 38, 29, 34, 37, 22, 15, 38

Mean: To find the mean, we sum up all the numbers and divide by the total count:

Mean = (40 + 38 + 29 + 34 + 37 + 22 + 15 + 38) / 8 = 273 / 8 = 34.125

Median: To find the median, we arrange the numbers in ascending order and find the middle value:

Arranged set: 15, 22, 29, 34, 37, 38, 38, 40

Median = (29 + 34) / 2 = 63 / 2 = 31.5

Mode: The mode is the number(s) that appear(s) most frequently in the set:

Mode = 38 (appears twice)

Set: 26, 32, 12, 18, 11, 14, 21, 12, 27

Mean: Mean = (26 + 32 + 12 + 18 + 11 + 14 + 21 + 12 + 27) / 9 = 173 / 9 ≈ 19.222

Median: Arranged set: 11, 12, 12, 14, 18, 21, 26, 27, 32

Median = 18

Mode: No mode (all numbers appear only once)

Set: 3, 3, 4, 7, 5, 7, 6, 7, 8, 8, 8, 9, 8, 10, 12, 9, 15, 15

Mean: Mean = (3 + 3 + 4 + 7 + 5 + 7 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 9 + 8 + 10 + 12 + 9 + 15 + 15) / 18 ≈ 8.611

Median: Arranged set: 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10, 12, 15, 15

Median = 8

Mode: Mode = 8 (appears 4 times)

Mean: 34.125, Median: 31.5, Mode: 38

Mean: 19.222, Median: 18, No mode

Mean: 8.611, Median: 8, Mode: 8

For more questions on Mean

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#sPJ8

There are 70 grandparents, 140 parents, and 190 children in attendance at the family reunion

Given data ,

Let's denote the number of grandparents as "g", the number of parents as "p", and the number of children as "c".

Given that there were 400 people total at the family reunion, we can write the equation:

g + p + c = 400

Now , there were twice as many parents as grandparents, so we can write:

p = 2g

And we are given that there were 50 more children than parents, so we can write:

c = p + 50

Now we can use the equations (1), (2), and (3) to solve for the values of g, p, and c.

On simplifying the equation , we get

g + 2g + (2g + 50) = 400

5g + 50 = 400

5g = 400 - 50

5g = 350

g = 350 / 5

g = 70

Now we can substitute the value of g into (2) to find the value of p:

p = 2g = 2 x 70 = 140

And we can substitute the value of p into (3) to find the value of c:

c = p + 50 = 140 + 50 = 190

Hence , there were 70 grandparents, 140 parents, and 190 children in attendance at the family reunion

To learn more about equations click :

https://brainly.com/question/19297665

#SPJ1

The approximate solution of the linear system represented by the graph is, (5, 6)

The equation of a straight line is a relationship between x and y coordinates, The general equation of a straight line is y = mx + c, where m is the slope of the line and c is the y-intercept.

Given that,

A graph in which two lines are intersecting each other,

basically solution of linear system means where both the lines will intersect,

So, in the graph it can be seen that lines are intersecting around x coordinate 5 and y coordinate 6,

Therefore, the solution is (5, 6)

To know more about Line check:

https://brainly.com/question/17188072

#SPJ1

8a+8+5a−6

=8a+8+5a+−6

=8a+8+5a+−6

=(8a+5a)+(8+−6)

=13a+2

=> (8a + 8) + (5a – 6)

=> (8a + 5a) + (8 – 6) [Combine like terms]

=> (13a + 2)

It has been (mathematically) proven that there is no polynomial time algorithm for any np-complete problem. the given statement is false.

In order to solve previously unsolvable issues, Leonid Khachiyan developed a polynomial-time method, in which the number of processing steps increases as a power of the number of variables rather than exponentially.

Determining whether NP-complete problems are tractable or intractable remains one of the most crucial concerns in theoretical computer science since it is unknown if any polynomial-time algorithms will ever be developed for them.

So, it is unknown if any polynomial-time algorithms will ever be developed for them.

By applying different constraints, a linear function is maximized or reduced in linear programming, a mathematical modelling approach. In commercial planning, industrial engineering, and—to a lesser extent—the social and physical sciences, this method has proven helpful for directing quantitative decisions.

For more question on Polynomial Time algorithm

https://brainly.com/question/8927262

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 2/15

Step-by-step explanation:

first, create a formula or expression

16x - 7 = x - 5

move x, subtract it

15x - 7 = -5

add 7

15x = 2

divide by 15

x = 2/15

sub in to check:

-4.85667 = -4.86667

Answer:

The converse is reversing this statement. If I have a dog, then I have a siberian husky"

Step-by-step explanation:

To check out how efficient or accurate a model is, we use the akaike information criterion or the Bayesian. If the AIC or BIC are lower, then this model would be better. They are also used to control for model complexity

Akaike information criterion = 2k-2ln where k is the number of parameter. A higher k gives a higher AIC.

In the real world complex models are discouraged and avoided since

1. They cause data to be over fitted and can capture noise and information from this data.

2. They are complex and therefore difficult to interpret

3. They consume a lot of time and computing them has several inefficiencies.

Using these two as measure of performance, we can select optimal choice of independent variable.

With forward/backward regression, we are able to put new variables in the model or remove from it. The best is the one with lowest AIC.

The scale factor and the value of x for each figure is given as follows:

A) Scale factor of 1/3, x = 7 m.

B) Scale factor 0.4747, x = 4.5 in.

For Figure A, we have that the ratio between the areas is given as follows:

510/4590 = 1/9.

As the area is measured in square units, while the side lengths are measured in units, the scale factor is the square root of 1/9, hence it is given as follows:

1/3.

Then the value of x is obtained as follows:

x = 21 x 1/3

x = 7 m.

For Figure B, we have that the ratio between the areas is given as follows:

16/71 = 0.22535.

The scale factor is then the square root of 0.22535, which is given as follows:

0.4747.

Then the value of x is given as follows:

x = 9.5 x 0.4747

x = 4.5 in.

A similar problem, also about dilation, is given at brainly.com/question/3457976

#SPJ1

Answer:

37,145

Step-by-step explanation:

43,700×15%= 6,555

43,700-6,555= 37,145

the previous population was 37,145

Step-by-step explanation:

the area of a parallelogram is

baseline × height = 5 × 3.2 = 16 m²

The unitary method is used to find the unit value of the quantity. The price for the buffet after taking half portion of swordfish will be $19.5.

In order to solve a problem for two different values of a quantity, its unit value is first derived. This method is known as unitary method.

Given that,

The price for complete buffet is $23 per person.

The price for swordfish per guest is $7.

Then, the price for half portion swordfish is $7 / 2 = $3.5.

Now, the price of buffet without swordfish is  $23 - $7 = $16.

Thus, after taking only half portion of swordfish the new price becomes,

$16 + $3.5 = $19.5

Hence, the new price of the buffet for each person will be $19.5.

To know more about unitary method click on,

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

The x value is 12, length is 14 feet and breath is 9 feet when the area of rectangle is 126 square feet.

Given that,

The rectangle has a surface area of 126 square feet.

The length is x+2 and the breath is x-3.

We have to find the x value, length and breath.

We know that,

The area of the rectangle is length × breath.

126=(x+2)(x-3)

126= x²-3x+2x-6

126= x²-x-6

x²-x-6-126=0

x²-x-132=0

x²-12x+11x-132=0

x(x-12)+11(x-12)=0

(x-12)(x+11)=0

x-12=0     or   x+11=0

x=12        or    x=-11

We take the x as positive so its 12.

Length is x+2=12+2=14

Breath is x-3=12-3=9

Therefore, The x value is 12, length is 14 feet and breath is 9 feet when the area of rectangle is 126 square feet.

To learn more about rectangle visit: https://brainly.com/question/15019502

#SPJ1

The probability of both coins landing on heads when two coins are tossed is 1/4, or 0.25, or 25%.

When two coins are tossed, there are four possible outcomes: both coins can land on heads (HH), both coins can land on tails (TT), the first coin can land on heads and the second coin on tails (HT), or the first coin can land on tails and the second coin on heads (TH).

Since we are interested in the probability of both coins landing on heads, we need to determine the number of favorable outcomes (HH) out of the total number of possible outcomes.

Out of the four possible outcomes, only one outcome is favorable (HH). Therefore, the probability of both coins landing on heads is 1 out of 4.

In fraction form, this can be written as 1/4. The probability can also be expressed as a decimal, which is 0.25, or as a percentage, which is 25%.

It's important to note that in this case, we assume that the coins are fair and unbiased, meaning that the probability of landing on heads is equal to the probability of landing on tails, which is 1/2 or 0.5 for each coin individually.

For more such questions on probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ8

Total number of possible outcomes:

Number of ways to choose 3 numbers from 56 (56 choose 3): 56! / (3! * (56 - 3)!) = 22,957

Number of ways to choose 1 number from 49: 49

Total number of possible outcomes = 22,957 * 49 = 1,128,593

Number of favorable outcomes:

Number of ways to choose 1 number from 49: 1

Number of favorable outcomes = 1

Probability of winning the minimum award:

Probability = Number of favorable outcomes / Total number of possible outcomes

Probability = 1 / 1,128,593 ≈ 0.000000888, or approximately 0.0000888%

The primitive function for \(f(x) = 4e^{2x} + e^{-x}\) is given by it's indefinite integral.

To calculate it, recall:

\(\frac{d}{dx}e^{ax}=ae^{ax}\)

\(\int c f(x)dx = c\int f(x)dx\)

Let's begin

\(\int 4e^{2x}+e^{-x}dx \\4\int e^{2x}dx+ \int e^{-x}dx\\4\frac{e^{2x}}{2}+\frac{e^{-x}}{-1} + c\\\)

\(F(x) = 2e^{2x}-e^{-x} +c\)

To find the costant, we just need to use the fact that \(F(0)=2\)

\(F(0) = 2 \\4e^{0}+e^{0} + c =2\\5+c =2\\c=-3\)

Therefore,

\(\boxed{F(x) = 2e^{2x} - e^{-x} -3 }\)

Answer:.

Step-by-step explanation im not sure

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

47.)  sin20 = 6/b

b = 6(sin20) = 17.5

c = √6²+17.5² = 18.5

48.)  tan61 = y/18

y = 18(tan61) = 32.5

z = √18²+32.5² = 37.1

49.)  r = √25²+23² = 34

50).  d = √30²+7² = 30.8

51.)  sin71 = j/19

j = 19(sin71) = 18

k = √19²-18² = 6.2

52.)  y = √4²-1² = √7 = 2.6

53.)  sin49 = f/26

f = 26(sin49) = 19.6

h = √26²-19.6² = 17

54.)  t = √7²+4² = 8.1

Using the cosine ratio, the distance between Dimitri and Sarah is calculated as approximately 12.4 m.

The cosine ratio is a trigonometric ratio that represents the ratio of the length of the adjacent side to the length of the hypotenuse in a right triangle. It is calculated by dividing the length of the adjacent side by the length of the hypotenuse.

Using the cosine ratio, we have:

Reference angle (∅) = 72 degrees

Hypotenuse length = 40 m

Adjacent length = distance between Dimitri and Sarah = x

Plug in the values:

cos 72 = x/40

x = cos 72 * 40

x ≈ 12.4 [to one decimal place]

Learn more about Cosine Ratio on:

https://brainly.com/question/15793827

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yes the membership is worth it. If you have a membership you will pay $140 for the whole year. Then, it is $3 everytime you workout and if you plan on working out 2 times a month the total will be $72 dollars. So $72 + $140 is $212 yearly. If you don't get the membership you pay $20 a month because you will workout twice a month. So, 20 times 12 is $240. It may seem like it's not worth it but it actually comes out cheaper. So, yes I do think the membership is worth it.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope you find this helpful. If you have questions feel free to ask.

Solution

Step 1

Write an expression for the question

Let the number be x

2x + 1 ≥ 7

2x ≥ 7 -1

2x ≥ 6

2x/2 ≥ 6/2

x ≥ 3

Step 2

Write the solution set for the problem

{x | x ≥ 3} Option D

The graph of g(x) is shifted 4 units up from the parent function

The equation of the parent function f(x) is given as

f(x) = x

The transformed function is given as

g(x) = x + 4

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

g(x) = f(x) + 4 or g(x) = f(x + 4)

This means that the function is shifted to the left by 4 units or it is shifted up by 4 units

Read more about transformation at

https://brainly.com/question/1548871

#SPJ1

The approximate difference in the circumferences of the two circles is: C. 61 cm.

Mathematically, the circumference of a circle can be calculated by using this mathematical expression:

C = 2πr or C = πD

Where:

Substituting the given parameters into the circumference of a circle formula, the circumference of the small circle is;

Circumference of circle, C = πD

Circumference of circle, C = 3.14 × 4.5

Circumference of circle, C = 14.13 cm.

For the larger circle, we have:

Circumference of circle, C = 3.14 × 24

Circumference of circle, C = 75.36 cm.

Difference = 75.36 cm - 14.13 cm.

Difference = 61.23 ≈ 61 cm.

Read more on a circle here: brainly.com/question/6615211

#SPJ1

Nathaniel drinks 3 glasses of water in one hour.

To find out how many glasses of water Nathaniel drinks in one hour, we need to calculate his drinking rate per hour.

In 2 2/5 hours, Nathaniel drinks 4/5 of a 10-ounce glass of water.

Let's convert the mixed number of hours to an improper fraction:

\(2\frac{2}{5} = \frac{(5 \times2 + 2)}{5}\)

\(=\frac{12}{5}\)

Now, we can set up a proportion to find his drinking rate per hour.

We know that \(\frac{12}{5}\) hours corresponds to \(\frac{4}{5}\) of a glass of water.

Let's assign "x" as the number of glasses he drinks in one hour.

The proportion is then

\(\frac{(\frac{12}{5} hours) }{(x glasses) } =\frac{(\frac{4}{5} glass)}{(1 hour)}\)

Cross-multiplying gives us

\((\frac{12}{5} )\times1=\frac{4}{5}\times(x)\)

Simplifying, we get

\(\frac{12}{5} =\frac{4}{5}\times x\)

Dividing both sides by \(\frac{4}{5}\), we find x:

\(x=\frac{(\frac{12}{5} )}{\frac{4}{5} }\)

\(x=\frac{12}{4}\)

\(x = 3.\)

Therefore, Nathaniel drinks 3 glasses of water in one hour.

For such more such question on glasses

https://brainly.com/question/11980886

#SPJ8

Answer:

is this on your test?...or?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Length between two points is given as √(x1-x2)²+(y1-y2)², where x and y are the coordinates of the points.

Distance = √(1-(-7))²+(-3-2)²

= √8²+(-5)²

= √64+25

= √89

= 9.43

= 9.4 (nearest tenth)

Answer:

\(\displaystyle d = 10\)

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Algebra I

Algebra II

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Point (-2, 5)

Point (4, 13)

Step 2: Identify

x₁ = -2, y₁ = 5

x₂ = 4, y₂ = 13

Step 3: Find distance d

Simply plug in the 2 coordinates into the distance formula to find distance d