A statement of personal or family history can be admissible under Rule 804(b)(4) if it concerns the declarant's own birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, legitimacy, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of personal or family history.
Rule 804(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Evidence allows the admission of hearsay statements that concern the declarant's own personal or family history, provided that the statement is made by a family member or other knowledgeable source, and is trustworthy.
The statement must be relevant to a fact of consequence in the case and must be more probative than any other evidence that could be obtained through reasonable efforts.
For example, a statement from a grandparent about the identity of a child's biological parent may be admissible under this rule. However, the statement must not be offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but only to establish the existence of the fact.
For more questions like Family history click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/17092502
#SPJ11
Discuss three digital footprints you have left within the last week.
Describe what online safety, security, or privacy issue exist for each footprint.
Describe a time when you or someone you know was a victim of phishing.
Explain three steps that could enhance your privacy, security, and safety online now and in the future.
Digital footprints that may have been left have been discussed below
Searching the web: When you search the web, you leave a digital footprint in the form of search history and cookies. This footprint can be used by companies to track your browsing habits and show you targeted ads. Privacy issues include the collection and use of personal data by companies without the user's knowledge or consent.Social media posts: When you post on social media, you leave a digital footprint in the form of your posts and activity. This footprint can be used by companies to track your interests and activity, and by hackers and scammers to gain access to your personal information. Privacy issues include the sharing of personal information with third parties and the potential for hackers to access personal information.Online shopping: When you shop online, you leave a digital footprint in the form of purchase history and payment information. This footprint can be used by companies to track your shopping habits and show you targeted ads. Privacy issues include the collection and use of personal information and payment information by companies without the user's knowledge or consent.As for online safety, security, and privacy, a few steps that could enhance them are:
Using a strong and unique password for each account, and changing them periodically.Using a reputable security software and keeping it updated.Being cautious when clicking on links or opening attachments in emails, even if they appear to be from a known sender.Using two-factor authentication whenever possible to add an extra layerRead more on digital footprints here: https://brainly.com/question/5679893
#SPJ1
It is the responsibility of the legislative branch to
O carry out the laws.
O enforce the laws.
O create the laws.
O interpret the laws.
Answer:
The responsibility of the legislative branch is to
create the laws.
1. Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a O courtroom drama, courtroom demeanor. courtroom practice. courtroom credibility.
Answer:
Investigators acting as police witnesses in a case should be prepared to encounter a certain amount of theatrics during the trial. They should cultivate a courtroom demeanor.
Explanation:
Courtroom demeanor refers to one's professionalism within a court of law. Your courtroom demeanor is an extremely crucial factor to how exactly your witness testimony is perceived by the jury or bench.
2 practical ways that could ensure that employers abide by the labour laws in our country
Answer:
Giving rewards to employers who abide by the labour laws, and punishing those who don't.
1. Why do you think that we should study crime and criminals? What information might we gain by doing so?
Answer: "By studying crime and criminals we could make our country safer by noticing trends and making changes that would positively impact our livelihoods."
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Crimes and criminals should be studied because they give us an insight into the purpose of the crime.
Explanation:
Studying criminals is necessary because it can tell us what behavior a future criminal will show from an early age. It also shows if the criminal is missing something in its brain to function as a normal humane being.
A
system is a labor system in which a prison buys machinery and raw material with
which incarcerated individuals manufactured a salable product.
O a. public works and ways
O b. state-use
O c. public account
O d. piece price
Option (c), A labor system known as a "Public Account system" involved a jail purchasing equipment and raw materials to enable convicts to produce a marketable commodity.
What separates the Consolidated Fund from the Public Account?The consolidated Fund is further divided into "Revenue" and "Capital" divisions. The Public Account receives all additional cash acquired by the government or on its behalf. The contingency fund enables the Government to pay unforeseen costs that cannot wait for parliamentary approval.
What are public accounts composed of?The money that is received on behalf of the Government is referred to as the Public Account in Article 266 of the Constitution. Money put in a public account is not the property of the government and must eventually be returned to the people and organizations that made the deposit.
Learn more about consolidated Fund: https://brainly.com/question/28583417
#SPJ1
What factors make voter turnout low or high?
Voter turnout can be high or low depending on a number of factors, including new election rules, the kind of election (e.g., presidential or midterm), and the level of competition in the race.
What factors lead to higher voter turnout?The type of election (e.g., presidential or midterm) and the level of competition in the race are other factors that affect voter turnout. the total number of voters in a jurisdiction that are of voting age (18 years of age or older).
What impact does age have on voter turnout?In a presidential election year, voters between the ages of 18 and 29 turn out between 47 and 65 percent of the time, while those over 60 turn out at a rate above 80 percent. People under 30 vote at a rate of 17–35% in midterm elections, whereas people over 60 vote at a rate of 70%.
To know more about voter turnout, visit:
brainly.com/question/1270103
#SPJ4
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
Why was the food safety modernization act passed? check all that apply.
The purposes of the Food Safety Modernization Act were:
Many citizens are in danger of contracting a food-borne illness.More people are living with chronic illnesses.Pathogens are becoming stronger and harder to defeat.What is the Food Safety Modernization Act?The Food Safety Modernization Act was enacted to prevent food-borne illnesses and ensure food safety.
The Food Safety Modernization Act overhauled food production regulations, giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more authority in overseeing and enforcing food supply chains.
Thus, the Food Safety Modernization Act prevents food-related problems from arising from the production stage to the consumption stage.
Learn more about the Food Safety Modernization Act at https://brainly.com/question/13653111
which case granted citizens' rights to an attorney in all felony cases?
The case that granted citizens' rights to an attorney in all felony cases is Gideon v. Wainwright. In 1963, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case of Gideon v. Wainwright that individuals facing felony charges have a constitutional right to legal representation, even if they cannot afford an attorney.
The case involved Clarence Earl Gideon, who was charged with breaking and entering a poolroom in Florida. Gideon requested the court to appoint him an attorney since he could not afford one, but his request was denied. Gideon represented himself during the trial and was ultimately convicted and sentenced to prison.
Gideon appealed his case to the Supreme Court, arguing that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that state courts are required to provide legal representation to defendants who cannot afford an attorney in felony cases, extending the right to counsel to all individuals regardless of their financial means.
The Gideon v. Wainwright decision significantly expanded the rights of individuals accused of crimes and has had a profound impact on the criminal justice system in the United States, ensuring fairer and more equitable legal representation for those who cannot afford an attorney.
To know more about felony cases refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/31748463
#SPJ11
4 A boy is 1. 5 m tall. He was 1. 21 m tall before the summer holidays. How much has he grown? 5 A garage door is 3. 75 m high. A lorry 2. 95 m high goes into the garage. Calculate the height of the gap between door frame and the lorry, giving your answer in cm. ?
The height of the gap between the door frame and the lorry is 80 cm.
4. the boy has grown by (1.5 m - 1.21 m) = 0.29 m.
5. to calculate the height of the gap between the door frame and the lorry, we subtract the height of the lorry from the height of the garage door: 3.75 m - 2.95 m = 0.8 m.
to convert this to centimeters, we multiply by 100: 0.8 m * 100 cm/m = 80 cm. in question 4, the boy has experienced a growth of 0.29 meters. this indicates that he has become taller during the summer holidays. growth in height is a common occurrence during childhood and adolescence as the body undergoes various physiological changes. the difference between the current height of 1.5 meters and the previous height of 1.21 meters represents the amount by which he has grown.
in question 5, the height of the garage door is given as 3.75 meters, and the height of the lorry is 2.95 meters. to determine the height of the gap between the door frame and the lorry, we subtract the height of the lorry from the height of the garage door. this calculation reveals that the gap measures 0.8 meters. converting this measurement to centimeters by multiplying by 100 yields a gap height of 80 centimeters.
understanding measurements, such as growth in height and the difference in heights between objects, is important in various contexts, from monitoring development to assessing clearance and space requirements in practical scenarios like fitting a vehicle through a garage door.
Learn more about physiological here:
https://brainly.com/question/9311395
#SPJ11
"Is it fair to impose monetary penalties that also affect family member quality of life?"
It can be argued that imposing monetary penalties that also affect the quality of life of family members may raise ethical concerns.
When monetary penalties are imposed, it is important to consider the potential impact on the well-being of not just the individual responsible for the penalty, but also their family members. Financial penalties can have ripple effects on a family's ability to meet their basic needs, maintain their standard of living, and access essential resources and services. In situations where the penalty significantly reduces the family's income or resources, it can result in hardship and negatively affect their quality of life.
However, the fairness of imposing such penalties depends on various factors, including the nature and severity of the offense, the ability of the individual to pay, and the intent behind the penalty. It is important for policymakers and authorities to consider alternative measures that minimize the potential impact on innocent family members while still ensuring accountability for the responsible individual. Additionally, implementing support systems and resources to assist affected families can help mitigate the potential negative consequences.
Overall, the fairness of imposing monetary penalties that affect family member quality of life requires a careful balance between accountability and the protection of innocent parties. Striking a balance that considers the broader impact on families can contribute to a more equitable and just approach to addressing penalties and their consequences.
For more such answers on ethical concerns
https://brainly.com/question/28340480
#SPJ8
You are in France and are accused of a crime. You ask for a trial by jury. Why is one not available?
Answer:
its either because of the crime or you are able to get a jury
Explanation:
When passing a large truck or other large vehicle, make sure you ___________ before pulling back in front of the vehicle.
A. count two seconds B. are at least 15 feet ahead C. can see the front of the vehicle in your rearview mirror D. are at least one car length ahead
When passing a large truck or other large vehicle, it is important to make sure you can see the front of the vehicle in your rearview mirror.
It is widely assumed that large vehicles or trucks have poor visibility around the front, back, and sides of the vehicle. They have a lot of blind spots, which can be dangerous for other smaller vehicles.
When passing such large trucks and vehicles, the front of the vehicles should be visible in the rearview mirror, which correlates to the truck driver's frontal view and can be assumed as an assurance that the smaller vehicle is visible and not hidden in the blind spots.
It is also critical to either slow down or move ahead to ensure that your vehicle is visible to large vehicle drivers.
To learn more about driving rules:
https://brainly.com/question/1071840
https://brainly.com/question/29744136
Light falls on a pair of slits 0.00177 cm apart.The slits are 88.5 cm from the screen.Thefirst-order bright line is 1.76 cm from thecentral bright line.What is the wavelength of the light
The wavelength of the light is approximately 0.0890085 cm.
to find the wavelength of light in this scenario, we can use the equation for the double-slit interference pattern:
λ = (d * l) / x
where:
λ is the wavelength of light
d is the distance between the slits
l is the distance from the slits to the screen
x is the distance between the central bright line and the first-order bright line
given:
d = 0.00177 cm (slit separation)
l = 88.5 cm (distance from slits to screen)
x = 1.76 cm (distance between central and first-order bright line)
substituting these values into the equation, we get:
λ = (0.00177 cm * 88.5 cm) / 1.76 cm
calculating this expression:
λ = 0.0890085 cm .
Learn more about wavelength here:
https://brainly.com/question/32680147
#SPJ11
A long-arm statute gives a court personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant who commits a tort within that state.
a. True
b. False
A key element of the corpus delicti of a crime is the identity of the person who committed it. True or False
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Corpus delicti is a Latin term used in criminal law and means the object of the crime. It concerns objects in respect of which the offense was committed; which are the object of the crime and which are thus, as it were, the direct object of that crime; for example, the car that was stealed by the thief, or the person that was murdered by a killer. It is, therefore, the thing which constitutes the purpose of the crime commited by a person.
On average, the Supreme Court hears _________ cases each year
a. one thousand b. seven hundred
c. four hundred d. fewer than a hundred
e. twenty-five
On average, the Supreme Court hears fewer than a hundred cases each year. The correct option is d.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and one of its key functions is to review and interpret federal law and the Constitution. However, the Court is highly selective in the cases it hears, and only takes a small percentage of the cases that are presented to it.
This selectivity is due to several factors, including the Court's limited resources and the desire to focus on the most significant legal issues. By hearing fewer cases, the Court is able to give each case more attention and ensure that it has adequate time to fully consider the legal and constitutional questions at issue. The correct option is d.
Learn more about Supreme Court at:
brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
In this course, glossary terms are
Answer:
This glossary of Course terms, written by Robert Perry, attempts to clarify the special meaning the Course gives familiar words like God, forgiveness, and miracle. Where applicable, it sets the Course’s meaning alongside the conventional definition and/or the traditional Christian usage. This glossary is keyed to the FIP edition of the Course.
In this course, glossary terms are bold green type. Glossaries are used to provide readers with a quick reference. Therefore, option (B) is correct.
What are glossary terms?Glossary terms are words or phrases that are defined and explained within a glossary. A glossary is a collection of terms and definitions that are typically found at the end of a book, document, or website.
They are used to give readers a quick reference for unfamiliar or specialized terms that are used within a particular context or field of study.
By including a glossary, authors and publishers can make their writing more accessible to a wider audience by providing definitions for technical terms that may be unfamiliar to some readers.
The glossary terms are bold green type, in this course. Thus, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about glossary terms here:
https://brainly.com/question/21683659
#SPJ2
The complete question might be:
In this course, glossary terms are___
A: italic green type
B: bold green type
C: underlined with a dotted line
D: italic red type
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale of goods between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answer:
sorry I didn't have the answer ok I needed the points
The law requiring that written express warranties on products costing more than ten dollars meet certain requirements is the
a) Consumer Product Safety Act
b) Federal Trade Commission Act
c) Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
d) National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act
e) None of the above
Answer:
C, Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act makes consumer products have details on the Warranty of the product.
The law requiring that written express warranties on products costing more than ten dollars meet certain requirements is the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. The correct answer is c) Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
This law requires that written express warranties on products costing more than ten dollars must meet certain requirements. These requirements include that the warranty must be written in plain language, must be readily available to the consumer before purchase, and must state any limitations or exclusions of warranty coverage. The purpose of this law is to protect consumers from false or misleading warranty claims and to ensure that consumers are fully informed about their rights and the coverage provided by a warranty. As a consumer, it is important to be aware of your rights under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and to carefully review any warranties before making a purchase.
To know more about Consumer visit:
brainly.com/question/23094521
#SPJ11
Which type of local ordinances deal with fire regulations which owners must follow?
Food safety
Sidewalks and streets
Zoning
Public safety
Answer:
i would say
Explanation:
food safety is the big on as if you don't follow regulations the the kitchen its 100 percent a fire hazard.
hope that helps let me if not and ill research more for you.
Answer: public safety
Explanation:
just sounds the best
How does secondary victimisation occur
Answer: Secondary victimization refers to the attitudes, processes, actions and omissions that many intentionally or unintentionally contribute to the re-victimization of a person who has experienced a traumatic incident as a victim through, for example, failure to treat the victim with respect and dignity.
Discuss whether, and if so how, harm reduction policies may
affect drug trafficking, drug consumption, and crime (400)
words
Harm reduction policies are public health strategies aimed at reducing the negative consequences associated with drug use, without necessarily requiring abstinence. These policies focus on minimizing the harms to individuals and communities by providing services such as needle exchanges, opioid substitution therapy, and supervised consumption sites.
Firstly, harm reduction policies can indirectly affect drug trafficking. By providing access to sterile needles and syringes through needle exchange programs, for example, harm reduction initiatives can reduce the transmission of blood-borne diseases among people who inject drugs. This can decrease the demand for drugs by lowering the health risks associated with injection drug use. Consequently, a reduced demand may lead to a decrease in drug trafficking as there is less profit to be made in supplying a smaller market. However, it is important to note that drug trafficking is a complex issue influenced by various factors, and harm reduction policies alone may not entirely eliminate it.
Secondly, harm reduction policies can have an impact on drug consumption patterns. By offering services such as opioid substitution therapy, where opioids are replaced with safer alternatives like methadone or buprenorphine, individuals are provided with a medically supervised and regulated approach to manage their drug use.
Finally, the relationship between harm reduction policies and crime is multifaceted. By providing a safe and controlled environment for drug consumption through supervised consumption sites, harm reduction initiatives can reduce the public visibility of drug use. s. However, it is important to recognize that harm reduction policies alone cannot entirely eradicate drug-related crime, as it is influenced by various socioeconomic factors and systemic issues.
Learn more about blood-borne diseases : brainly.com/question/27960155
#SPJ11
how are 'discrimination' and 'illegal discrimination' different? what are the four components of the ouch test and how should it be used? why is the ouch test important for hr to understand?
The main difference between discrimination and illegal discrimination is that discrimination can be legal, while illegal discrimination is against the law. Discrimination is the act of treating someone differently based on certain characteristics, such as race, gender, or religion. However, illegal discrimination is when this treatment is prohibited by law, such as in the case of employment or housing.
The OUCH test is a tool used by HR professionals to determine if a decision or action is discriminatory. The four components of the OUCH test are:
1. Objective - Is the decision based on facts and evidence, rather than personal opinions or biases?
2. Uniform in application - Is the decision applied consistently to all employees, regardless of their characteristics?
3. Consistent with the company's values - Does the decision align with the company's values and mission?
4. Has job-related consequences - Is the decision related to the employee's job performance or responsibilities?
The OUCH test is important for HR to understand because it helps them make fair and unbiased decisions. By using the OUCH test, HR professionals can ensure that they are not discriminating against employees and that their decisions are based on objective criteria. This can help prevent legal issues and create a more inclusive and equitable workplace.
For more similar questions on legal:
brainly.com/question/27992858
#SPJ11
Sal has ordered 100 pounds of shrimp for his restaurant from sam every friday for 5 years and has always paid that week’s market price. One friday, sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell sam. Sam claims they have a contract, even though it was never written down. What kind of contract do they have?.
The implied-in-fact contract exist between them despite that Sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell Sam he will not be available for he Friday transaction.
What is an implied-in-fact contract?This kind of contract of one where the obligations arose from the mutual agreement and promise whereas the agreement and promise have not been expressed in words.
Therefore, the implied-in-fact contract exist between them despite that Sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell Sam he will not be available for he Friday transaction.
Read more about implied-in-fact contract
brainly.com/question/17201056
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11
Let
a
,
b
where
a
=(a
1
,a
2
),
b
=(b
1
,b
2
) where 0
2
1
y 0
2
1
a) Consider the vector
c
=(−a
2
,a
1
). What is the relationship between the vectors
a
and
c
? b) Calcute
c
⋅
b
c) Explain why
c
⋅
b
is the area of the paralle lo gram formed by the vectors
a
and
b
prove that
a
×
b
=(0,0,a
1
b
2
−a
2
b
1
)
The cross product of vectors a and b is equal to (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1).
a) The relationship between the vectors a and c is that c is the result of rotating vector a by 90 degrees counterclockwise. In other words, vector c is the perpendicular (or orthogonal) vector to vector a.
b) To calculate the dot product c ⋅ b, we multiply the corresponding components of c and b and sum them up.
c ⋅ b = (-a2) * b1 + (a1) * b2
c) The dot product c ⋅ b represents the projection of vector c onto vector b. The absolute value of c ⋅ b represents the area of the parallelogram formed by vectors a and b.
To prove that a × b = (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1), we use the cross product formula:
a × b = (a1, a2, 0) × (b1, b2, 0)
Expanding the cross product:
= (a2 * 0 - 0 * b2, 0 * b1 - a1 * 0, a1 * b2 - a2 * b1)
= (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1)
Therefore, the cross product of vectors a and b is equal to (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1).
To know more about rotating vector visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30262632
#SPJ11
an advocate who falsely compares apples with oranges would be committing the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. group of answer choices
No, an advocate who falsely compares apples with oranges would not be committing the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.
The post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy refers to the mistaken belief that ifone event follows another, the first event must have caused the second event. Comparing apples with oranges may be a flawed analogy or a logical fallacy, but it is not specifically related to post hoc reasoning.
The post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, which translates to "after this, therefore because of this," occurs when someone assumes that because one event follows another, the first event must have caused the second event. It is a form of faulty reasoning that assumes causation based on mere temporal sequence.
To learn more about ergo propter click here : brainly.com/question/32117999
#SPJ11
What can be the maximum claim amount at the district level of the consumer court.
The maximum claim amount at the district level of the consumer court varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific consumer protection laws of the country.
In India, for instance, the maximum claim amount at the district level of the consumer court is Rs. 20 lakh (20,00,000 Indian Rupees). This means that consumers can file complaints seeking compensation up to this specified limit for any grievances related to goods or services.
It's important to note that the maximum claim amount can differ in different countries or regions, so it's advisable to consult the specific consumer protection laws and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction in question.
Learn more about Jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11