Why do you want to enroll in Philippine National Police Academy?
2+ Sentences English answer only
The reason that made me want to enroll in Philippine National Police Academy are:
The chance to serve the country as well as the people in permanent duty Post.The full benefits that I will get on my appointment as Police Lieutenant in the PNP, or as Fire and Jail Inspector in the BFP and BJMP after I have finished my graduation.What is the purpose of the Philippine National Police Academy?PNPA, or Philippine National Police Academy. The PNPA is the top school for training police officers and the main place where police lieutenants are appointed. The Chief of the PNP shall have direct administrative and operational oversight of and control over the PNPA.
The Philippine National Police Academy is the top public safety organization that develops the PNP, BJMP, and BFPPN's future leaders. The Philippine Military Academy (PMA), whose cadets graduate as second lieutenants, has a police counterpart in PA. When they graduate, PNPA cadets also receive the rank of lieutenant.
Therefore, In the PNP or the Fire and Jail Management Services, graduates of the PNPA are appointed to the initial rank of Police Lieutenant or Inspector, respectively.
Learn more about National Police Academy from
https://brainly.com/question/4285702
#SPJ1
Which answer choice provides an accurate and objective summary of the article?
(A) The Supreme Court's recent ruling on employment discrimination against LGBT workers extends the
Civil Rights Act of 1964's protections against sex discrimination to include discrimination based on
sexual orientation and gender identity as well.
(B) In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that legal protections against workplace discrimination based
on sex should also be applied to sexual orientation and gender identity, settling inconsistencies between
the last two presidential administrations and promising future legal conflicts over the extent of LGBT
rights under current law.
(C)
The Supreme Court's June 15 decision was the result of three separate but related appeals heard by
lower federal courts, in which workers were fired from their jobs after disclosing either their sexual
orientation or gender identity. The Court's decision upheld two of those appeals and overturned the
decision in the third, extending employment protections to the 11.3 million LGBT people in the United
States.
(D)
Three justices dissented in the Supreme Court's June 15 decision, arguing that there is a legitimate
legal distinction between discrimination based on sex, which is prohibited by the Civil Rights Act of
1964, and discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Answer:
have a good day
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes the image and its creator?
The image displays a pile of cash money with the caption, Who Will Really Decide the Next Election, and with the word – really - underlined and bold.
Public Domain
A political action committee wants voters to donate more money to its candidates.
An interest group is using symbolism to imply that money influences politics unfairly.
A candidate for political office is using propaganda to suggest the other candidate is only supported by the wealthy.
A banking company is suggesting that only money can win an election.
Answer:
2 I believe its 2 but Ii could be wrong
Answer:
B. An interest group is using symbolism to imply that money influences politics unfairly.
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
Which best explains how the Supremacy Clause is connected to federalism?
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the federal government has more power than state governments.
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the state governments have more power than the federal government.
O The Supremacy Clause forces the federal government and state governments to share power equally.
O The Supremacy Clause forces the federal government and state governments to fight for power
Answer: The Supremacy Clause establishes that the federal government has more power than state governments.
Supremacy clause is found in the constitution of the USA and establishes federal laws. There are certain treaties under the authority. It represents the supreme law of the land.
It is essential for a conflict of laws and rules specific that a federal act takes into focus over the state which can conflict with the federal laws. Hence the clause states that the federal has more power than the state govt.Hence the option A is correct.
Learn more about the explains how Supremacy Clause is connected.
brainly.com/question/17607342.
If someone feels that their trial was not fair or was handled wrong, what is 5 points
the next step they can take in the judicial process? *
They can flee to another country and then declare a new trial.
They can ask for a Congressman to pardon them.
They can appeal to a higher court of law.
They can fire their lawyer and ask the judge for another trial,
Answer:
They can appeal to a higher court of law
Explanation:
to stu128971 sorry i took your points ill give you 50 brainly points
Answer:
Ummm why is this even here
Explanation:
Which laws enforced by the Department of Labor protects adolescent
workers?
Marbury v. Madison, How does it relate to the Constitution?
Explanation:
strengthen the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review
Is there a justification of presidential power expansion because of an actual or perceived voter mandate for the president to take control? Why or why not?
Yes, there a justification of presidential power expansion because of an actual or perceived voter mandate for the president to take control?
What is the justification?Presidential power expansion can be a complex and controversial issue, and the justification for such expansion may depend on a variety of factors. One potential justification for expanding presidential power is an actual or perceived voter mandate for the president to take control.
In a democratic system, voters elect a president to represent their interests and carry out their policy preferences. If a president is elected with a clear mandate and a strong majority, they may argue that they have been given a mandate to pursue their agenda and that expanding their power is necessary to fulfill that mandate.
However, the idea of a voter mandate is not without controversy. Some argue that it is difficult to determine what exactly a mandate means, or whether a president's agenda is truly representative of the will of the people. Additionally, expanding presidential power can be seen as a threat to the system of checks and balances that is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
Ultimately, the justification for expanding presidential power in response to a voter mandate will depend on the specific circumstances and political context. It is important for any president who seeks to expand their power to justify their actions and explain how they are acting in the best interests of the people they were elected to represent.
Learn more about power at:
https://brainly.com/question/2248465
#SPJ1
Represented by whom? No one you! It is an affront to democracy to suggest that just because you understand how life works in Austin, you should be able to call the shots for the rest of us.
Answer:
elected
Explanation:
Represented by whom? No one elected you! It is an affront to democracy to suggest that just because you understand how life works in Austin, you should be able to call the shots for the rest of us.
Which of the following gives you the ability to access and read memos
written by a Congressional committee while writing tax law?
A. The Freedom of Information Act
B. The Federal Communications Commission
C. The Internal Revenue Service
D. A powerful citator
Answer:
A. The Freedom of Information ActExplanation: I just took the test
In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court struck down state laws outlawing the use of contraceptives on the basis of privacy rights. The fact that the Court relied on a right to privacy that is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution reflects ________.
Answer:
the view that the Court's interpretation of the Constitution needs to change with the times
Explanation:
Why is it, that you can get warnings on this app for the literal dum est of
reasons?
I couldn't exactly remember how you did an equation so I told the guy the proper things too look up. I GOT WARNED, "Please don't post unhelpful things" HOW IS THAT UNHELPFUL?! #Fixthewarningsystem
Answer:
#Fixthewarningsystem
Explanation:
Answer:
Brainly... #Fixthewarningsystem
Explanation:
#Fixthewarningsystem
sorry i'm late, but this also happened to me and I didn't even get a reason why. i was so confused as to why this happened, like i didn't even do anything wrong.
Tariffs do all of the following except _____.
A. provide domestic goods an advantage over imported ones
B. be significantly reduced or eliminated by trade agreements
C. encourage economic competitiveness
D. increase customs duties on imports
Answer:
C. Encourage economic competitiveness.
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Answer:
C. encourage economic competitiveness
Explanation:
got it right on edge 2023 business law!!
what is the role of government agencies in solving public problems?
John Locke’s theories on natural rights were incorporated into the: Magna Carta. Stamp Act. English Bill of Rights. Declaration of Independence.
Answer:
Explanation:
English Bill of Rights.
Explain the difference between the way that laws are made in Australia through parliaments and through the courts.
Answer:
The Parliament (represented by an icon of Australian Parliament House) has the power to make and change law. The Executive (represented by a group of people) has the power to put law into action. The Judiciary (represented by an icon of a scale) has the power to make judgements on law
Question 10 of 10
What is the constitutional basis for the expressed powers of the federal
government?
A. They are allowed by the necessary and proper clause of the
Constitution.
B. They were assumed by the writers of the Constitution to be
necessary for the government to function.
OC. They are spelled out in the Bill of Rights.
D. They are directly listed in the Constitution.
Answer:
Explanation:
A. They are allowed by the necessary and proper clause of the
Constitution.
B. They were assumed by the writers of the Constitution to be
necessary for the government to function.
OC. They are spelled out in the Bill of Rights.
D. They are directly listed in the Constitution.
An assault victim describes the attacker as “a bearded, 25-year-old black man, light-skinned, wearing a white shirt.”
When the police bring the victim in for a lineup, one man has facial hair and wears a white shirt.
All of the fillers wear dark shirts. None have facial hair, and several have very dark skin.
If the victim chooses the bearded man in a white shirt, should this identification hold up in court? Explain your reasoning.
(Hint: Apply what is happening with the fillers in your response. Look carefully at the witness description. If you need help, revisit the Pretrial Eyewitness Identification course page.)
The white shirt doesn't necessarily mean anything, but if he is also a bearded 25-year-old light-skinned black man, then the identification by the assault victim is valid in the court.
Assault victims are people who have been physically or sexually abused by another person. This can include people who have been raped, beaten, or otherwise harmed by someone else. Witness suffer from physical injuries, emotional trauma, or both. They may have difficulty trusting people, and may feel scared or helpless.
They may have injuries that need medical attention. It is important for assault victims to get help from a doctor or nurse as soon as possible. In court it is important to remember that assault victims are not to blame for what happened .
To know more about Assault victim, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/9824812
#SPJ1
A BAL of .12 reduces the distance a pedestrian can be seen by
a driver by about.
15%
10%
20%
5%
A BAL of .12 reduces the distance a pedestrian can be seen by a driver by about C. 20%
How does the BAL reduce the chances?This is because alcohol impairs a driver's ability to focus and react quickly, which can make it difficult to see and avoid pedestrians. In many cases, this is enough to make the visibility distance much less than the stopping distance, which can lead to a crash.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that alcohol driving is a factor in one-third of all traffic fatalities in the United States. In 2019, there were 10,142 people killed in alcohol-driving crashes.
Find out more on BLA at https://brainly.com/question/2231540
#SPJ1
Question 8 of 10
What is one reason the Constitution divides powers between the federal
government and state governments?
A. To prevent another American Revolution from occurring
B. To limit the power of the federal government
C. To ensure that the government will be able to collect taxes
D. To provide more opportunities for citizens to serve as
representatives
Answer:
B. To limit the power of the federal government
A car driven by a vacationer and a tractor-trailer driven by truck driver collided with each other. The vacationer filed an action based on negligence against the truck driver in federal district court in the state in which he resided. The court had subject-matter jurisdiction over this action but not personal jurisdiction over the truck driver, who did not reside in the forum state but rather in the state in which the accident had occurred. The truck driver timely filed a motion to dismiss the action due to lack of personal jurisdiction and proper venue. May the court transfer the action to the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice
Answer:
Answer C is correct
Explanation:
Although venue isn't improper in the forum court because the accident did not occur in the forum state nor did the defendant truck driver reside there, the forum court may transfer the action to any judicial district in which it originally could of been brought if it determines that such transfer in the interest of justice. Here, the action could of been brought into the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides
Considering the situation described in the question, it is true that:
The court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
This is based on the United States law code 28, Part IV, Chapter 87, Subsection 1404, Article A., which explains the need for Change of Venue.
This portion of the United States code stated that for convenience purposes that involve parties to the case and witnesses, particularly in the interest of justice, a district court might move any civil action to any other district to which all parties have consented.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that it is true that the court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24893162
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
You hear that a man is suing the local restaurant because he claims the food that he was served contained spices that permanently damaged his taste receptors. Do you think his suit has merit?
Answer:
c. No. The taste buds get replaced every ten days or so, so he is likely to regain his sense of taste.
Explanation:
Our taste buds are the taste receptor cells that allow us to specify the type of taste that we can detect as sweet, sour, salty, bitter, etc. These taste buds are located at the upper surface of the tongue and detect the type of taste that comes from the foods we consume.
So, even though the man may think his taste buds are permanently damaged, that is not the case. Taste buds can be permanently damaged but only in cases of burning the tongue with hot foods. Since spices can't damage taste buds, his opinion of his taste buds permanently damaged is wrong. Our taste buds get replaced every 10 days or two weeks. So, in his case, he will regain his taste buds after some days.
Therefore, his act of suing the local restaurant does not have any merit. Thus, the correct answer is option c.
Aside from the president, who else has the authority to enact an executive order?
A). state governors
B). law enforcement officials
C). no one else
D). senators
only the president can enact an executive order
Answer:
C. No one else.
Explanation:
Only the president has the authority to enact an executive order.
How is optimum population determined in a nation?
Pls answer subject economic
Grade 9 please help urgent
Answer:
The highest possible longevity
Explanation:
The mayor of a town has been making speeches on television to tell people how to be safe and healthy during flu season. Members of a grassroots movement come to her office to ask that she have a certified interpreter translate her words into American Sign Language as she speaks on television.
Which cause is this grassroots movement most likely involved in?
fair elections
better schools
disability rights
environmental protection
Disability rights is the cause is this grassroots movement most likely involved in. Hence, option C is correct.
What is Disability rights?People with impairments have a right to respectable living standards, social security, and economic security. According to their abilities, they have the right to unionize, to obtain and hold a job, and to engage in a desirable, rewarding profession.
Disability Rights UK is the leading organization in the UK for people with disabilities. In order to reform local, state, and federal policies that will better the economic, social, and legal position of individuals with disabilities.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about Disability rights, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30038100
#SPJ1
Tell me who Frank abagnale was, what he was convicted of, and how he was caught
Answer: Frank Abagnale entered the world of crime as a youngster with credit card and check schemes. He later impersonated various white-collar professionals,...planation:
explain the term 'power struggles' in the context of gender abuse.
In the context of gender abuse, power struggles refer to situations in which an abuser uses their power and control over the victim to maintain dominance and control.
What is gender abuse ?Gender abuse, also known as domestic violence or intimate partner violence, is a pattern of behavior in which one partner uses physical, sexual, emotional, or financial abuse to exert power and control over the other partner.
In power struggles related to gender abuse, the abuser may use a variety of tactics to maintain control, such as intimidation, threats, isolation, coercion, or physical violence. These tactics can make it difficult for the victim to assert their own power and autonomy within the relationship, as they may be afraid of the consequences of defying the abuser.
Find out more on gender abuse at https://brainly.com/question/28182587
#SPJ1
Ques-5 satyagarhis
wins battle through
non violence explain with examples
طلسمشفع ععصيام
طو
Answer:
Ghandi
Explanation:
Ghandi fought peacefully but stood up for what he believed in.