Answer: a
Explanation: The Maya knew how to accurately predict aclypcis and they understude the concept of zero they were the only civilization that had a written language so the answer is a sorry for the bad spelling
URGENT: China Decolonization:
Part 1: Why were people protesting in Tiananmen Square in April of 1989?
Part 2: How did the Chinese government respond to the protests?
The people protested in Tiananmen Square in 1989 for political reforms and the Chinese government responded with a violent crackdown.
Part 1: People were protesting in Tiananmen Square in April of 1989 primarily to demand political reforms, freedom of speech, and an end to corruption within the Chinese government. The protests initially began with students and intellectuals, but soon gained support from various segments of society, including workers, urban residents, and even some members of the Communist Party. The demonstrators sought greater democracy and transparency in the government, as well as an improvement in living conditions and economic opportunities.Part 2: The Chinese government responded to the protests in Tiananmen Square with a heavy-handed approach. Initially, the government attempted to quell the demonstrations through dialogue and negotiations. However, as the protests persisted and grew in size, the authorities declared martial law and deployed troops and armed forces to suppress the movement. On June 3-4, 1989, the government initiated a violent crackdown on the protesters, resulting in the loss of many lives and widespread arrests.The government's response to the protests was characterized by a combination of censorship, propaganda, and the use of force. They imposed strict media control to prevent information about the protests from spreading and implemented a propaganda campaign to discredit the demonstrators. The Chinese government's crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests marked a significant event in modern Chinese history, leaving a lasting impact on the country's political and social landscape.For more questions on Chinese
https://brainly.com/question/31815687
#SPJ8
Explain how it was possible that most Southerners did not own slaves but supported slavery. Explain why most Northerners disliked slavery but did not do much to end it before the Civil War.
Answer:
Slavery, for the first time, became part of the trade and led at the beginning of the slave trade in America.
Explanation:
The economy of the South based on farming with the help of slaves. The South maintained slavery as a part of the legal system, which benefited Southerners in generating wealth and holding a strong position in export. Many of the non-slaveholding Southerners also tied into the slavery system. Their commercial interests followed just like the planters. Poorer whites Southerner were legally and socially superior to slaves in society.
Northerners disliked slavery, as they consider it to be an illegal practice. They had a system of free labour, manufacturing industries built along with shipping. Slavery developed hand-in-hand with the founding of North and South, through the economic, political, and social system of the new nation. Some Northerners believed controlling than leaving them free on their will.
Although the Emancipation Proclamation did nothing to actually free enslaved people,
O Formerly enslaved people were to remain disenfranchised.
formerly enslaved people were never allowed to own land.
OIt publicly declared that the United States was committed to ending slavery.
Enslaved people were easily accepted into society.
It publicly declared that the United States was committed to ending slavery.
Explanation:The Emancipation Proclamation was given by Abraham Lincoln on January 1st, 1863, in the midst of the Civil War.
Freeing Slaves
The question is accurate in saying that the Emancipation Proclamation did not actually free any slaves. Specifically, the Emancipation Proclamation said that all slaves in rebelling states (the confederacy) were free. However, of course, the Confederacy did not listen to the proclamation, and thus, no slaves were actually freed. The most criticized part of the Emancipation Proclamation is that it allowed slavery to continue in border states. Remember that border states were pro-slavery states that sided with the Union.
Political Effects
Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not free slaves, it still had a large effect on the Civil War. It is important to note that prior to the Emancipation Proclamation, Great Britain imported weaponry and ships into the South in return for cotton. Additionally, Great Britain had already banned slavery within its own border. The Emancipation Proclamation showed the world, specifically Britain, that the Civil War was more than a domestic dispute; it was undoubtedly a war over slavery.
After the Emancipation Proclamation was passed, Great Britain stopped all trade with the pro-slavery South. This cut the Confederacy off from its allies. Since the South had almost no manufacturing of its own, the Confederacy began to run out of supplies very quickly.
1. How does totalitarianism differ from authoritarianism?
Answer:
Explanation:Mientras el autoritarismo busca acallar a los disidentes y evitar sus expresiones en público, el totalitarismo en cambio busca no solo acallar sino también extirpar las formas de pensamiento opuestas, mediante el adoctrinamiento y la remodelación de las mentalidades culturales.
. though now generally recognized as an important contributor to the american literary canon, [marker for question 3] hurston was one of the most controversial authors of her time.
Zora Neale Hurston was an American author, folklorist, and anthropologist who was born in 1891 and died in 1960. Hurston was one of the most significant authors of the Harlem Renaissance, a period of cultural and artistic innovation in the United States in the 1920s and 1930s.
Despite the fact that she is now regarded as an essential contributor to the American literary canon, she was one of the most controversial authors of her time.In the 1930s, Hurston was chastised for her efforts to defend Southern black folklore and black language. She was critical of the standardization of the English language and believed that the complexity and vibrancy of Southern black dialect were worth celebrating.Her work and individualism were frequently dismissed by the other intellectuals of the time, who believed that African Americans should represent their race in a particular way.
She was chastised for refusing to take up a political stance in her writings. Hurston was also chastised for her attitude toward black femininity, which she celebrated and often portrayed as self-reliant and bold. Her novel Their Eyes Were Watching God, which was first published in 1937, was especially controversial. Despite this, it is now widely regarded as one of the most essential works of American literature and is taught in high schools and universities throughout the country.
To know more about Zora Neale Hurston visit-
brainly.com/question/29547057
#SPJ11
which of the following criticisms for the english utilitarian philosophers (bentham and his follower j.s. mill) does nietzsches offer?
a. They are less concerned with the happiness of the majority than the happiness of England
b. They treat egoism as a matter of general welfare
c. The requirement that there be a single morality for everyone
d. All of the above
e. None of the above
Nietzsche's criticism for the English utilitarian philosophers (Bentham and his follower J.S. Mill) is that they treat egoism as a matter of general welfare.
Nietzsche believed that the utilitarian philosophers were misguided in their approach to ethics. He believed that the pursuit of happiness and pleasure should be for the individual and not for the collective welfare. He criticized Bentham and Mill for treating egoism as a matter of general welfare, which he believed would lead to the oppression of the individual. Nietzsche believed that morality should be subjective and that each individual should determine their own morality based on their personal experiences and values.
Therefore, option B, "They treat egoism as a matter of general welfare," is the correct answer to the question. Nietzsche's criticism of the utilitarian philosophers is that they prioritize the happiness of the collective over the individual, which he believed was a flawed approach to ethics.
To know more about philosophers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/715989
#SPJ11
What happens if January 20 falls on a Sunday? Will give BRAINLIESTT
If January 20 falls on a Sunday, the inauguration of the United States President will still take place on that day. However, the public inauguration ceremony may be adjusted or rescheduled.
In the United States, the presidential inauguration traditionally takes place on January 20th, as mandated by the Constitution. If this date happens to fall on a Sunday, the public inauguration ceremony is typically held on that day. However, if January 20 falls on a Sunday, and in order to avoid any conflict with religious observances, the public ceremony may be moved to the following day, January 21.
This decision is made in consultation with the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies and the incoming President. The private swearing-in of the President, however, will still occur on January 20, as required by the Constitution.
To learn more about Presidential Inauguration, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30630120
#SPJ11
n 1926 won the magazine’s guarantors’ prize, which had previously been won by robert frost and edna st. vincent millay
In 1926, the literary magazine "The Hampden-Sydney Poetry Review" awarded its guarantor's prize to Robert Penn Warren.
This prize had previously been won by two of the nation's foremost poets, Robert Frost and Edna St. Vincent Millay. Warren's winning submission was a collection of poems entitled "New and Selected Poems". These poems, inspired by the culture and society of the American South, focused on themes of love, loss, death, and identity. Warren's work was widely praised for its originality and depth of emotion, and it earned him the distinction of being the first Southern poet to win the prize.
Warren went on to become one of the most influential American poets of the 20th century, and his work continues to be lauded as a major contribution to American literature. From this one accolade, Warren's career flourished, and his work is still celebrated today as a classic example of American poetry.
To know more about Robert Penn Warren, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9718578
#SPJ4
What was the Treaty of Versailles? Who was invited to the peace talks to
create it, and who wasn't? What effect did the Treaty have on the losing
nations? In your opinion, was the Treaty of Versailles fair? Why or why
not?
What did you learn from the movie?
What stood out to you?
What was Dunkirk?
Why was this event so important?
By watching the film you can learn how the war scenario is frightening and challenging for those involved. Those challenges might be what stands out in the movie for you because the soldiers have to be brave and resilient.
Dunkirk is a film that depicts the evacuation of Allied soldiers from the beaches of Dunkirk. This event was very important because it happened in the second world war because allowed the German army to be surrounded by the Allied forces.
What did this event promote in real life?The victory of the Allied forces.The fall of Nazi Germany.The end of the second world war.The film "Dunkirk" portrays this moment from three different perspectives, as it shows the challenges of Allied soldiers as they battle for land, mass, and air.
In addition, the film is very immersive, allowing the audience to feel all the tension and importance of this moment.
Learn more about Dunkirk:
https://brainly.com/question/30551933
#SPJ1
2. Discuss in about 3 paragraphs what the Scorpion Mace Head and
the Narmer palette tell us about the origins of the Egyptian
state.
The Narmer Palette, often referred to as either the Great Hierakonpolis Palette and the Palette of Narmer, is a notable Egyptian archaeological find that dates to around the 31st century BC and, at least ostensibly, falls within the category called cosmetic palettes.
Some in the earliest hieroglyphic writings ever discovered can be found there. Daily-use palettes have only one side that was embellished. The elaborate carvings on the Narmer Palette depict King Narmer's victory in war and the gods' blessing of Egypt's union.
The Scorpion macehead is an decorated ancient Egyptian macehead that was discovered by British archaeologists James E. Quibell as well as Frederick W. Green during the 1897–1898 excavation season at Hierakonpolis.
Learn more about Narmer Palette, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1189781
#SPJ4
Does napping during the day affect how many hours a person sleeps at night. what is the independent and dependent variable for this sentence.
Answer:
Independant Variable = Napping
Dependent Variable = Sleep at night
Explanation:
The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study. The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable.
What is the capital of South dakota
Answer:
pierre
Explanation:
Answer:
Pierre :))))))
Explanation:
south carolina congressman, _______________________, hatched an elaborate scheme concerning tariffs in order to damage adams' chances for reelection in 1828.
The name of the South Carolina congressman who hatched an elaborate scheme concerning tariffs in order to damage Adams' chances for reelection in 1828 is John C. Calhoun.
Learn more about congressman with the given link,
https://brainly.com/question/29875308
#SPJ11
ito ay tawag sa mga anak ng mag-asawang magkaiba ang lahi?
Answer:
mestizo or mestiza
Explanation:
Ang salitang mestíso (mestizo) mestísa (mestiza) say tumutukoy sa mga anak ng mag-asawang magkaiba ang lahi. Noong panahon ng Español, ito ang naging taguri sa anak ng Español o Chino na ama at ng inang Filipina (o India) o ang kabaligtaran nito.
The first book in the chronological order of the New Testament is ? , written in ? .
First part options:
Matthew
the Epistle of Jude
the Epistle of James
Second part options:
51 AD
63 AD
45 AD
The first book in the chronological order of the New Testament is "the Epistle of James," written in 45 AD.
The New Testament consists of multiple books, and the order in which they are arranged is not strictly chronological. However, based on historical analysis and scholarly consensus.
The Epistle of James is considered to be one of the earliest writings in the New Testament. It is attributed to James, who is traditionally believed to be the brother of Jesus.
Regarding the second part of your question, the specific year of authorship for the Epistle of James is not definitively established.
However, it is commonly believed to have been written around 45 AD, making it one of the earliest books in the New Testament.
It's important to note that the order of the books in the New Testament can vary depending on the specific tradition or scholarly interpretation. While the Epistle of James is often considered one of the earliest books, there may be slight variations in the chronological order based on different perspectives.
for similar questions on chronological order.
https://brainly.com/question/24454650
#SPJ8
Explain the primary differences in government, religion, and economics between European, Asian and African cultures.
PLEASE QUICKLY ANSWER
Answer:
People in Central and Eastern Europe are less accepting of Muslims and Jews, same-sex marriage, and legal abortion
The Iron Curtain that once divided Europe may be long gone, but the continent today is split by stark differences in public attitudes toward religion, minorities and social issues such as gay marriage and legal abortion. Compared with Western Europeans, fewer Central and Eastern Europeans would welcome Muslims or Jews into their families or neighborhoods, extend the right of marriage to gay or lesbian couples or broaden the definition of national identity to include people born outside their country.
These differences emerge from a series of surveys conducted by Pew Research Center between 2015 and 2017 among nearly 56,000 adults (ages 18 and older) in 34 Western, Central and Eastern European countries, and they continue to divide the continent more than a decade after the European Union began to expand well beyond its Western European roots to include, among others, the Central European countries of Poland and Hungary, and the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
Explanation:
FIND THE SLOP don't wrry abt my answers
20 points
Answer:
huh
Explanation:
Based on this excerpt, explain Ure’s point of view on child labor in the Industrial Revolution.
Based on the provided excerpt, it is not possible for me to assume any specific excerpt without having the actual text or information to analyze. In order to accurately explain Ure's point of view on child labor in the Industrial Revolution, it is crucial to have the original excerpt or relevant information.
However, in general, it is known that during the Industrial Revolution, there were differing opinions on child labor. Some individuals, including factory owners and proponents of industrialization, argued that child labor was necessary for economic growth and the development of industries. They believed that children were more agile and trainable, and their employment helped lower production costs.On the other hand, there were critics of child labor who emphasized the harsh working conditions, long hours, and lack of proper education and health provisions for young workers. These critics viewed child labor as exploitative and detrimental to the well-being and development of children.To provide a more accurate analysis of Ure's point of view, it would be necessary to have access to the specific excerpt or source material that highlights his perspective on child labor in the Industrial Revolution.The complete question should be What was Ure's perspective on child labor during the Industrial Revolution, and what were the main factors influencing his viewpoint?For more questions on excerpt
https://brainly.com/question/21400963
#SPJ8
Which general’s “March to the Sea” is remembered for its scorched earth tactics and relentless destruction?
A.Robert E. Lee
B.William Sherman
C.Abraham Lincoln
D.Ulysses S. Grant
Answer:
William Sherman
Explanation:
The intersection of math and religion led to what in Egypt?
Answer:
Ancient Egyptian architectural monuments.
Explanation:
Ancient monuments and temples of Egypt constructed with the help of the joining of math and religion. Most buildings created by the use of available of mud-brick and limestone. Ancient Egyptian architecture is known for its temples, pyramids, tombs, palaces, and fortresses. Many of the monuments were in advance by using sophisticated measurements, designs and plans. Religion plays a role in constructing temples, decorations in walls, carved statues, and hieroglyphs (symbols).
What were two major outcomes of the winning of the french and indian war, by the british, that would be troubling for the british colonists?.
In what year did the average stock price start to rise again?
Answer:
1921? I think it's been a few years since I've learned this
Answer:
1945 (after WW2)
Explanation:
The stock market crash of 1929 was one of the key events that set off the Great Depression, a period of severe economic slump that lasted from 1929 to 1939.
The stock market dropped precipitously after the crash and hit its lowest point in July 1932. The widely used stock market index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), dropped from a high of 381.2 in September 1929 to a low of 41.2 in July 1932.
After that, the stock market began to slowly rebound, but it wasn't until the end of World War II in 1945 that it started to expand consistently. Consequently, following the Great Depression, it took over ten years for the average stock price to start increasing once more.
In the premodern United States, the courtship and mate selection process for young people was controlled by:1. organized religion2. the young people themselves.3. parents and kin.4. states' legal systems.
In the premodern United States, the courtship and mate selection process for young people was controlled by parents and kin.
This statement is represented by the third option. The courtship and mate selection process for young people were usually influenced by their parents and kin. Parental approval and advice were significant factors in determining who the young people chose as mates. Parents played a key role in selecting suitable partners, and they had a lot of power over their children's marital decisions. Most parents focused on the social and economic characteristics of their children's potential spouses, as well as their religious beliefs.
Furthermore, courtship was frequently used as a means of demonstrating social status, and the man's ability to provide for the woman and their future family was a key factor in selecting a partner. It's important to note that arranged marriages, in which parents and other family members chose a partner for the young people, were prevalent in premodern societies, including the premodern United States. However, by the 19th century, young people were given more freedom in selecting their partners.
Learn more on courtship here:
brainly.com/question/21083576
#SPJ11
2) Why do you think it might be important to know the background of a news organization or their
intended audience? How might that help you better critically read a news source?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think it might be important to know the background of a news organization or its intended audience because it would be a good way to know if there are "hidden hands" that operate the news company. By "hidden hands" I mean people or owners who have a particular agenda o personal interests who support the corporate world interests or the interests of political parties.
How might that help you better critically read a news source?
If the news media company reveals who is behind its ideology, we -the readers or the audience- would understand if the way they report the news is biased or tries to manipulate the audience to favor a specific political ideology, candidate, or economic interest.
THis would allow transparency in the way companies handle the news.
14
Case Study: The Kennewick Man
The most contentious case in the history of NAGPRA, and one of the stimuli in moving this legislation forward was the case of the Kennewick Man. In 1996, human skeletal remains were found by canoers along the bank of the Columbia River in Kennewick, WA. Upon further inspection this skeleton, dubbed Kennewick Man, turned out to be 8,400 years old and at the time was one of the most complete skeletons ever found in North America. The primary basis of these results were radiometric tests to determine the age and the inspection of the skeleton by several trained osteologists. Once Kennewick’s age and origins were discovered, scientists immediately recognized the significance of these remains to understanding the peopling of the Americas by over the last 13,000 years.
Almost as soon as Kennewick Man was discovered to be an early American, the Columbia River Basin Indian tribes also recognized that this individual was likely a distant relative and, therefore, could be repatriated (returned) under NAGPRA. The primary basis of their case was oral history of the peopling of this area and long-term residence of contemporary tribes which indicated he was a direct tribal ancestor. The problem? Under NAGPRA "cultural affiliation" is usually determined using burial goods, burial style, and other "archaeological" (read "scientific") markers of culture. Oral history is not considered evidence of cultural affiliation.
Thus was born the ethical and legal dilemma:
Under NAGPRA the remains did not have to be legally returned.
Scientists working on the remains argued the following:
To repatriate unaffiliated remains would be unethical as Native Americans are not monolithic and contemporary groups’ burial practices aren’t identical to their early ancestors; in other words, Columbia River Basin tribal burial practices are different today than they were 8,000 or more years ago.
From the standpoint of beneficence, these remains belonged to all of humanity not just these descendants. To rebury these remains without studying them could set research on early diseases, ways of life, etc. back centuries.
Tribal leaders working on getting the remains repatriated argued the following:
It would be unethical to keep remains unburied and in a museum given long-term cultural norms about the dead.
From the standpoint of nonmaleficence and autonomy, the tribal leaders noted that this ancestor had not consented to being studied (much like Henrietta Lacks in the 1950s) and this individual and the community would be harmed by not being able to decide the fate of Kennewick Man’s remains.
Over the decades Kennewick Man went from storage to research lab to storage and finally was placed in permanent storage in 2002. On February 17, 2017, more than twenty years after his remains were found, Kennewick Man’s skeleton was returned to the earth in a private, unmarked location. While the issue has technically been resolved, the ethical dilemmas from this scenario continue to inform the way researchers think about further research.
Answer:
The case of the Kennewick Man highlights an ethical and legal dilemma that arose under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The Columbia River Basin Indian tribes recognized Kennewick Man as a distant relative and wanted to repatriate the remains under NAGPRA, based on oral history and the belief that he was a direct tribal ancestor. However, under NAGPRA, "cultural affiliation" is usually determined using archaeological markers of culture, such as burial goods and burial style, rather than oral history.
Scientists working on the remains argued that to repatriate unaffiliated remains would be unethical, as it could set research on early diseases and ways of life back centuries. They also argued that the remains belonged to all of humanity and not just the descendants of the Columbia River Basin Indian tribes. On the other hand, tribal leaders argued that it would be unethical to keep the remains unburied and in a museum, given cultural norms about the dead. They also noted that this ancestor had not consented to being studied and that the community would be harmed by not being able to decide the fate of Kennewick Man's remains.
Ultimately, after more than 20 years of legal and ethical debates, Kennewick Man's skeleton was returned to the earth in a private, unmarked location in 2017. This case continues to inform the way researchers think about further research and the ethical implications of studying human remains.
"We are met," Lincoln says in line three, "on a great battlefield of that war." What is the name of that battlefield?
a
Antietam
b
Harpers Ferry
c
Manassas
d
Gettysburg
Answer: The name of the battlefield Lincoln referred to in that line is Gettysburg.
Answer: D: Gettysburg
Explanation: In the third line of the speech, Lincoln states, "We are met on a great battlefield of that war," referring to the Battle of Gettysburg.
“Better keep yourself clean and bright; you are the window through which you
must see the world.”—George Bernard Shaw
write an interpretive response explaining
the truth it conveys
Answer:
180000⁰000
Explanation:
five hundred digress
What effect did the conflict between Athens and Sparta have on ancient Greek civilization?
Answer:
It caused further fractures among the Greek city-states
Explanation:
Athens and Sparta were the two ancient Greek city-states. They played an important role to shape the future of Greek culture. However, wars between the two caused further fractures among the Greek cities-states and eventually led to the Peloponnesian War.
What is Victor Hugo's opinion of "the vast Colossus," Napoleon?
a.Napoleon soared high but ultimately fell victim to his contradictions.
b.Napoleon failed because he was an inadequate general.
c.Napoleon was a usurper who deserved to be exiled from Europe.
d.Napoleon had nothing to regret.
According to Victor Hugo, his opinion of "the vast Colossus," Napoleon is that "Napoleon soared high but ultimately fell victim to his contradictions." Therefore, the correct answer is option a. Napoleon soared high but ultimately fell victim to his contradictions.
Victor Hugo was a French poet, novelist, and dramatist of the Romantic movement. He is considered one of the greatest and best-known French writers. In his works, Hugo often expressed his opinion on Napoleon Bonaparte, who was a French statesman and military leader.
Hugo believed that Napoleon was a great leader who had achieved many successes but ultimately fell victim to his own contradictions and mistakes.
This opinion is reflected in his description of Napoleon as "the vast Colossus," which suggests that Napoleon was a larger-than-life figure who ultimately fell due to his own flaws.
Hence the correct option is a.
For more similar questions on Napoleon:
brainly.com/question/26150427
#SPJ11