What is the main idea?
doesnt want to show the history of the country in the books
Explanation:
President Woodrow Wilson claimed that the United States entered World War I to safeguard democracy.
Answer:
the stance taken by the United States in its attempt to remain isolated from World War I.
Explanation:
What was the result ahmed gragns war
Ahmed Gragn's war was a conflict that occurred in the 16th century between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia. The result of the war was that Adal Sultanate was defeated by Abyssinia and Ahmed Gragn was killed.
Ahmed Gragn, also known as Ahmed Gran, was an influential Muslim leader who led the Adal Sultanate against Abyssinia in the 16th century. His invasion of Abyssinia resulted in a significant conflict that lasted for around 14 years, beginning in 1529 AD.
The conflict began when Ahmed Gragn launched an attack on the Christian kingdom of Abyssinia, which was ruled by Lebna Dengel at the time. In 1531, he was able to capture the city of Harar, which gave him a strategic position to launch further attacks on Abyssinia. However, despite his early successes, Ahmed Gragn's campaign ultimately failed, and he was killed in 1543.
The war between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia was a significant event in the history of Ethiopia. The conflict weakened Adal Sultanate and strengthened Abyssinia. After Ahmed Gragn's death, Abyssinia continued to expand its territory, and its rulers maintained control of the region for several centuries.
learn more about Ahmed Gragn's war
https://brainly.com/question/15233756
who is responsible for the first world war
Answer:
The responsibility for the First World War is a complex and controversial issue. While there is no one single cause, many historians argue that a combination of factors, including nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and the complex web of alliances that existed between European powers, contributed to the outbreak of the war. Ultimately, the war was the result of a complex set of circumstances and decisions made by many different actors, and it is difficult to attribute responsibility to any one individual or country.
Read the passage. Then answer the question that follows.
The Denim Company is a producer of jeans, while Sheets to the Wind produces toilet paper. There is a significant level of competition in each of their particular markets, partly due to the fact that there are few barriers to entry.
What type of market structures do these two businesses belong in?
monopoly
monopolistic competition
perfect competition
oligopoly
The type of market structure that Denim Company and Sheets to the Wind belong in is C. perfect competition.
What are market structures?Market structures refer to the classification and differentiation of markets based on competitive characteristics.
Economists have identified four market structures, including:
Perfect competitionMonopolistic competitionOligopolyMonopoly.Thus, for Denim Company and Sheets to the Wind, the market structure that affects them is C. Perfect competition.
Learn more about market structures at https://brainly.com/question/334966
#SPJ1
HURRY PLEASEEEEEEEE What were four major events in U.S. history in the 1900s?
Answer:
1900 – U.S. population exceeds 75 million.
1900 – U.S. helps put down Boxer Rebellion.
1900 – 1900 Galveston hurricane.
1900 – U.S. presidential election, 1900: William McKinley re–elected president; Theodore Roosevelt elected vice president.
Explanation:
Answer:
World War 1, World War 2, The Great Depression, The Cold War
Explanation:
WW1, WW2, and The Cold War are all obvious, pretty sure the great depression is another major event
If you meant decade then the answer above should help you
Why do you think historical context changes over
time? Give an example of context changing around an issue or event.
A given change in the historical context is subject to time and other geographical factors, as the ideologies evolve over time bringing about social reformations in the society.
What are social reformations?The changes that take place in a society over a brief period of time, and such change intends to restructure the conditions of the society in political and economic aspects as well.
One of the examples of social reformations in historical context is the issue of slavery in the America. Slavery was allowed and freely followed in America; however it came to an end in the 20th century.
Hence, the significance of social reformations in historical context is aforementioned.
Learn more about social reformations here:
https://brainly.com/question/3332629
#SPJ1
Which of the following was not brought to the Americas by Europeans?
a.
horses
c.
smallpox
b.
Asian spices
d.
tomatoes
Answer:
d
Explanation:
C smallpox came from south America
brainliest to correct answer
Answer: THE ANSWER IS!!!
Capitalism :)
HIH
state one impact of union activity.
Answer:
The power of labor unions rests in their two main tools of influence: restricting labor supply and increasing labor demand. Some economists compare them to cartels.
Explanation:
What nation outside of Japan had the most cultural influence on Japan?
Answer:
China
Explanation:
China has been the most powerful nation in the region and this has resulted in Japan absorbing many elements of Chinese culture.
The nation that had the most cultural influence on Japan was China. This is evident from the Chinese influences on Japanese architecture, religion, and cuisine. Additionally, the Chinese writing system was adapted by the Japanese, and Chinese literary traditions were highly respected. While other nations also had an influence on Japan, such as Korea and the Ryukyu Islands, China was the most influential.
_____________________________________________
Let me know if there are any questions regarding my answer.
Consider that President Roosevelt delivered the "Four Freedoms" speech on January 6, 1941. What is the historical context of
this speech in relation to World II
Answer:
On January 6, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt addresses Congress in an effort to move the nation away from a foreign policy of neutrality.
Explanation:
On January 6, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt addresses Congress in an effort to move the nation away from a foreign policy of neutrality. The president had watched with increasing anxiety as European nations struggled and fell to Hitler’s fascist regime and was intent on rallying public support for the United States to take a stronger interventionist role. In his address to the 77th Congress, Roosevelt stated that the need of the moment is that our actions and our policy should be devoted primarily–almost exclusively–to meeting the foreign peril. For all our domestic problems are now a part of the great emergency.
How did the branches of the U.S. government work together to address the problem of tobacco use and its impact on consumer health?(10 points)
PLEASE BE DETAILED
The branches of the U.S. government, especially the Legislative and Executive worked together to address the problem of tobacco use and its impact on consumer health by passing the Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (also known as Tobacco Control Act).
What was the Tobacco Control Act?It refers to the federal legislation in the United States that was signed into law by Barack Obama in 2009 which Act gives the Food and Drug Administration the power to regulate the tobacco industry.
The need for the legislation arise to protect the public and create a healthier future for all Americans, thus, the Act gave the FDA an authority to regulate the manufacture, distribution and marketing of tobacco products.
Read more about Tobacco Control Act
brainly.com/question/1148346
#SPJ1
Both the House and Senate propose and vote on bills in basically the same way. What is really the only difference in the Senate when it comes to debating a bill?
Select one:
A. There is no roll call voting in the Senate.
B. Senate bills don't have to go to the President for signatures.
C. There is no time limit in the Senate.
D.The Senate can override bills vetoed by the House.
Answer:
D.The Senate can override bills vetoed by the House.
Explanation:
brainless plss no one ever give them
help i will give brainliest. do the 2 boxes on the right
Answer:
What do u want us to do?? Sorry i dont reLLY UNDERSTAND
Explanation:
Lowering reserve requirements would be called an open-market operation.
True
False
Why might citizens benefit from state and local governments having different powers than the federal government?
Which side has the better argument based on the text of the Constitution? Does it make sense that the same proposal that made reference to "capital crimes" in the Fifth Amendment contemplated a ban on capital punishment in the Eighth Amendment?
Answer:
Explanation:
The text of the Constitution itself does not explicitly state whether or not capital punishment is constitutional. The Fifth Amendment mentions "capital crime" as a possible reason for someone to be deprived of life, but it does not necessarily endorse capital punishment as a form of punishment. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments," which could potentially include capital punishment, depending on one's interpretation.
Therefore, it is difficult to say which side has the better argument based solely on the text of the Constitution. Both sides can make reasonable arguments based on their interpretations of the Constitution.
As for the proposal that made reference to "capital crimes" in the Fifth Amendment and a ban on capital punishment in the Eighth Amendment, it is not necessarily contradictory. The Fifth Amendment allows for the possibility of capital punishment, but it does not require it. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments," which could potentially include capital punishment if it is deemed to be cruel or unusual. So, it is possible for someone to argue that while capital punishment may be allowed in some cases, it should be banned as a cruel and unusual punishment.
if 1 plus 1 equals 2 then why do you get no females
Answer:
Because i'm straight :)
Explanation:
I get guys instead
write an essay that analyzes and explains how protests have changed throughout U.S. history, yet have also stayed the same. Discuss reasons why the protests have changed over the years.
Protests have been a fundamental aspect of American history, dating back to the colonial era. They have been used as a means of expressing dissent, demanding change, and asserting the rights of marginalized groups. While protests have evolved throughout U.S. history, they have also remained a constant feature of American society. In this essay, I will analyze and explain how protests have changed throughout U.S. history, yet have also stayed the same, and discuss reasons why the protests have changed over the years.
One of the ways in which protests have changed throughout U.S. history is in their scope and scale. In the colonial era, protests were typically small-scale and localized, such as the Boston Tea Party, which was a protest against British taxes on tea. However, in the 20th century, protests became larger and more widespread, such as the Civil Rights Movement, which was a nationwide movement for racial equality. This change in scope and scale can be attributed to the growth of mass communication technologies, such as newspapers and radio, which allowed for the spread of information and mobilization of people across large distances.
Another way in which protests have changed throughout U.S. history is in their tactics and forms of expression. In the colonial era, protests were often violent, such as the Boston Tea Party, which involved the destruction of private property. However, in the 20th century, protests became more peaceful and non-violent, such as the Civil Rights Movement, which employed tactics such as sit-ins and boycotts. This change in tactics can be attributed to the influence of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., who advocated for non-violent civil disobedience as a means of social change.
However, despite these changes, protests have also remained the same in certain ways. Protests have always been a means of expressing dissent and demanding change. Throughout U.S. history, protesters have sought to challenge the status quo and assert their rights and beliefs. Additionally, protests have always been a means of empowering marginalized groups and giving voice to their struggles. For example, the Boston Tea Party was a protest against British taxes on tea, which disproportionately affected the poor, while the Civil Rights Movement sought to end racial discrimination and secure the rights of African Americans.
The reasons why the protests have changed over the years are varied. The growth of mass communication technologies has allowed for the spread of information and mobilization of people across large distances. Additionally, the influence of leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. has led to a shift towards non-violent forms of protest. Furthermore, social, economic and political changes in the country also played a significant role in the evolution of the protests.
In conclusion, protests have been a fundamental aspect of American history and have changed throughout U.S. history in terms of scope and scale, tactics, and forms of expression. However, they have also remained the same in terms of their function as a means of expressing dissent and demanding change. The reasons for these changes are varied and include the growth of mass communication technologies, the influence of leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. and the social, economic and political changes in the country.
Your Welcome :) Hope you have a great day!
What did Nixon's visit to China prove to the US?
A. If you can deal with one communist nation, others will likely join in
B. The Soviet Union was close to falling apart and communism would leave Eastern Europe
C. Most communist nations actually practice capitalism and have free elections
D. The communist world was not a single entity, and had many different positions
Answer is D. The communist world was not a single entity, and had many different positions.
What did Nixon's visit to China prove to the US?Nixon's visit to China in 1972 proved to be a pivotal moment in US-China relations. Prior to Nixon's visit, the two countries had been locked in a tense Cold War stand-off, with no diplomatic relations. However, Nixon's visit was a historic breakthrough that led to the normalization of relations between the two countries. Moreover, this visit marked the first time a US President had visited China and signified a major shift in US foreign policy. Nixon's visit to China enabled the US to recognize the People's Republic of China and opened the door for future cooperation and dialogue between the two countries. Ultimately, Nixon's visit to China served as a turning point in US-China relations and showed the United States' commitment to pursuing peace and diplomacy over conflict.To learn more about Nixon's visit to China refer :
brainly.com/question/30564953
#SPJ1
What is the difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law?
O A. A theory is a description of natural events. A law attempts to
explain the causes of natural events.
B. A law is a description of natural events. A theory attempts to
explain the causes of natural events.
O C. A theory is an educated guess. A law is a fact.
O D. A law is an educated guess. A theory is a fact.
SUBMI
Answer:
a scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. The explanation of a phenomenon is called a scientific
Which sentence states a reason that would support a claim in favor of American use of the atomic bomb during World War II? On August 6, 1945, the US Air Force dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, killing more than 70,000 people. Japan’s surrender came just days after the bombing of Hiroshima, ending the war and saving countless lives. Niels Bohr was one of the many physicists who worked at Los Alamos to develop the atomic bomb. Many scientists, including Albert Einstein, opposed the development and use of further nuclear weapons.
Answer:
2
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Why did the United States and the Soviet Union emerge as rival superpowers after World War II?
Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many of the Americans fears of a Russian plan to conquer the world.
The United States and the Soviet Union emerged as an rival superpowers after World War II because they had emerged from World War II in strong positions.
After World War II the superpowers called USA and the Soviet Union had emerged in quite a strong position. As these both countries had large populations and strong economies so they benefitted much from supplying arms and munitions during the World War II.
So, these two powers are said to have competed with each other both economically and politically over the next 50 years. This rivalry was caused because it outlined the differences in ideology between the two superpowers.
Hence, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the world's two superpowers after World War II.
To learn more about the World War II here:
https://brainly.com/question/28404549
#SPJ1
How could Native Americans or African Americans improve their social status?
-By running away.
-By paying a fee.
-By marrying a Spaniard.
-None of the above
Answer:
none of the above
sorry if I'm wrong
According to the Salinan creation story, chief of the animals was the
Answer:
The Bald Eagle
Explanation:
“ When the world was finished, there were as yet no people, but the Bald Eagle was the chief of the animals”
Which is one example of how traditional Indian ways of life have changed?
The government provided some jobs to Dalits. The government allowed some private ownership of the business.
The lowest caste in India is the Dalit, formerly known as the untouchable. Dalits were considered to form a fifth varna, also known as Panchama, and were thus barred from Hinduism's four other varnas.
Untouchable, often known as Dalit, formally Scheduled Caste, originally Harijan, is the old designation for anyone who belongs to one of the many low-caste Hindu communities as well as anyone who is not a part of the caste system in traditional Indian society.
In India and other South Asian nations, the Dalits, often known as the "untouchables," are born into a life of marginalization, exclusion, and human rights abuses.
Learn more about the Dalits here:
https://brainly.com/question/31113603
#SPJ1
Write down three differences between the first and second crusade.
Answer:
As in the First Crusade, many simple pilgrims responded. Unlike the First Crusade, however, the Second Crusade was led by two of Europe’s greatest rulers, King Louis VII of France and Emperor Conrad III of Germany. Louis enthusiastically supported the Crusade, but Conrad was reluctant at first and was won over only by the eloquence of St. Bernard. The Second Crusade also differed from its predecessor in that there were three objectives instead of one. While the kings of Germany and France marched east to restore Edessa, other Crusaders went to Spain to fight Muslims or to the shores of the Baltic Sea to fight the pagan Wends.
What were the Crusades?The Crusades were a series of religious wars initiated, supported, and sometimes directed by the Latin Church in the medieval period. The best known of these military expeditions are those to the Holy Land in the period between 1095 and 1291 that were intended to conquer Jerusalem and its surrounding area from Muslim rule. Beginning with the First Crusade, which resulted in the conquest of Jerusalem in 1099, dozens of military campaigns were organised, providing a focal point of European history for centuries. Crusading declined rapidly after the 15th century.
The Muslims won the Crusades, as they managed to take back ownership of the Holy Land. The Crusades began in 1095 and ended with the fall of Acre in 1291, which marked the end of the Crusader States and the Crusade itself. While the Crusades resulted in defeat for Europeans and a Muslim victory (HOW), they successfully extended the reach of Christianity and Western civilization, and improved trade and transportation throughout Europe.
Learn more about the Crusades here:
https://brainly.com/question/4159680
https://brainly.com/question/8191125
what changed in Europe and East Asia between 200 CE and 500 CE?
Between 200 CE and 500 CE, several significant changes occurred in Europe and East Asia.
In Europe, the decline of the Roman Empire continued and eventually led to its collapse in 476 CE. This period saw the emergence of new Germanic kingdoms, such as the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths, as well as the rise of the Byzantine Empire in the eastern Mediterranean. Additionally, the spread of Christianity continued, and by the end of this period, it had become the dominant religion in the Roman Empire.
In East Asia, China during the Han Dynasty reached its peak of power and culture, but by the end of the 2nd century CE, the empire began to decline and was eventually replaced by a number of smaller kingdoms. Additionally, Buddhism began to spread from India to China during this period, and by the end of the 5th century CE, it had become a significant religious and cultural influence in China.
In Korea and Japan, the Three Kingdoms period was coming to an end, and a single ruling state started to emerge. This period also saw the spread of Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism in the region.
In India, the Gupta Empire rose to power and established a golden age of Indian culture and science, with advancements in mathematics, astronomy, and the arts. Buddhism continued to be an important religion during this time.
Overall, Europe and East Asia experienced a period of political and cultural change and transition during this time period, as well as the spread of new religions and the emergence of new political powers.
Answer:
In Europe, the decline of the Western Roman Empire was a major change that occurred during this period. The empire experienced a period of political instability, economic decline, and invasions by barbarian tribes, which led to its eventual collapse in 476 CE. This ushered in a period of political fragmentation, known as the "Dark Ages," during which small kingdoms and city-states emerged in place of the unified empire.In East Asia, the Three Kingdoms period in China (220-280 CE) and the Jin Dynasty (265-420 CE) marked a period of political division and instability after the collapse of the Han Dynasty.
Overall, during this period, both Europe and East Asia experienced political instability and fragmentation, but also saw the emergence of new political entities and cultural and religious developments.
Explanation:
Which statement best describes how climate affected economic development in West Texas?
Answer:
Climate affects livestock directly and indirectly, since it modifies the quality and/or quantity of food available, the requirements of water and energy, and the amount of energy consumed and the use of it. The animals cope with these adverse conditions of climate by altering physiological and behavioral mechanisms in order to maintain their body temperature within a normal ran