which foreign leader supported ronald reagan's plan to hold firm against communism?responsesbritain's margaret thatcherbritain's margaret thatcherindia's indira gandhiindia's indira gandhirussia's mikhail gorbachevrussia's mikhail gorbachevnicaragua's manuel noriega
Answers
Related Questions
Help please!
Which statement is true about Parliament?
A. It guaranteed the right to a trial by jury.
B. It signed the English Bill of Rights.
C. It protected the right to own private property.
D. It was a two-house legislature.
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
its a two-house legislature..
( im not so sure doe )
Como contribuyen las casitas bioclimáticas al bienestar de las familias que viven en las zonas altoandinas
Answers
Answer:
Contribuyen de manera que ayuda a que las familias no tengan tanto frio en tiempos de helada y no se enfermen con enfermedades respiratorias que perjudicarían su salud y la de su familia.
Explanation:
2. Who were John Newton and John Cochrane? What role did they play in the eventual dismissal of
Burnside as commander of the Army of the Potomac?
Answers
John Newton was one of just two evangelical Anglican priests in the city, and he quickly rose to prominence among the expanding evangelical party. The Rose-Marie and Jack Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution is John H. Cochrane.
What role did John Newton and John Cochrane play in Burnside's final dismissal?Burnside had a significant influence on the Civil War. Cochrane led a victorious campaign along the Carolina coast, including some of the war's first amphibious operations. His wins there were among the first notable Union victories in the Eastern Theater, and he was elevated to major general as a result.
John Newton was one of the city's only two evangelical Anglican priests, and he swiftly came to prominence among the city's growing evangelical party. John H. Cochrane is the Rose-Marie and Jack Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Learn more about the John Cochrane, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15392915
#SPJ1
HELPPPP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
Discussion Topic
The democratic republican system of government in the United States is defined by the US Constitution. As one of the longest lasting government documents in the world, Americans take pride in the stability and fairness of their governmental system. What makes the Constitution so remarkable was that it was written in the late 1700s yet still governs the country today. The Founding Fathers had no idea how the world would change when they wrote the original document. Scholars argue that they never intended for their form of government to last as long as it has without significant changes.
But what do you think? If you could do it all over again, what changes would you make to America’s form of government? Is our republican form of government ideal, or do we need a more democratic system of government? Would the US be better off with a little less democracy and a little bit more governmental authority? What about our system of federalism—do states have too much power or too little?
Please answer all questions In 1-2 paragraph(s). Make sure each of your answers addresses the question entirely, using proper language and grammar.
Answers
In the past few days I've learned a lot about our government. In this essay I will discuss my thoughts on our government.
To start off, I do think that our government needs some changes in it's running. for example the US government has a problem with privacy. The government is constantly collecting information on us to advertise products. This is not good. enough problem is that there's an ongoing debate between Democratic and Republican. in my opinion, I think both have benefits, and instead of debating, I think everybody should be entitled to their opinion, but they should politely disagree. another issue with our government is control. government is starting to become very controlling of its people. a country should be a place where all people are welcome and can do what they want as long as it's not hurting others or themselves. government makes things a certain way because of power. we can see this in certain States. some states have too much power while others have too little. I personally do not think this is fair. in my opinion, all states have the same text and laws. in conclusion, I think our government does need some changes.
just trade those two and its correct
Answers
Answer:
What's the question that you need an answer too?
John cabot lands in north america and claims the land in the name of king henry vii of england. True or false?.
Answers
True: John Cabot landed in North America and claimed the land in the name of king Henry VII of England.
John Cabot was a Genovese sailor and explorer at the service of the English crown.
In 1497 Cabot departed from the English port of Bristol. The objective was to reach the islands of Cipango in Asia navigating the Atlantic ocean through the North West. He had the permission and support of king Henry VII of England.
After a first failed voyage, Cabot landed in North America, in actual Canadian territories. Cape Bonavista is the officially recognized site of his arrival. However, the precise spot of landing is not sure. It could be somewhere in Terranova, Labrador, New Scotia, or Cape Breton island.
His voyage was one of the arguments for why the English crown claimed territories in North America.
You can learn more about John Cabot's expedition in the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/26801846
#SPJ4
PLEASE HELP
What does the author mean when he says historian Michael Parrish “draws a straight line between the events at Pearl Harbor and the momentous struggle for civil rights”?
A. The historian drew a diagram of events.
B. The quest for equality was always smooth.
C. The events at Pearl Harbor and Miller’s actions are connected to the civil rights movement.
D. Miller’s actions led to immediate changes and the end of racial discrimination.
Answers
Answer: Option C is the correct interpretation of the author's statement.
Explanation:
When the author says historian Michael Parrish "draws a straight line between the events at Pearl Harbor and the momentous struggle for civil rights," it means that Parrish has identified a direct and significant connection between the events at Pearl Harbor (such as the attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II) and the subsequent civil rights movement.
This statement implies that Parrish has identified historical links and influences between the impact of Pearl Harbor, the war effort, and subsequent social and political changes related to civil rights. It suggests that the events at Pearl Harbor and the actions that followed, along with other historical factors, had an impact on the struggle for civil rights in a significant and consequential way.
which elements were part of the state constitution of coahuila y tejas in 1827?
Answers
The State Constitution of Coahuila y Tejas, enacted in 1827, incorporated several key elements. First and foremost, it established Coahuila y Tejas as a constituent state within the federal system of Mexico. The constitution outlined the structure and powers of the state government, delineating the roles of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This framework aimed to establish a representative form of government where elected officials would represent the interests of the people.
Religiously, the constitution recognized Roman Catholicism as the official religion of the state. However, it also provided for religious toleration, acknowledging the freedom to practice other faiths. This provision reflected the desire to respect religious diversity within the state.
Moreover, the Constitution aimed to protect the fundamental rights of individuals. It included provisions safeguarding personal liberties, such as freedom of speech, press, and assembly. These protections were crucial in upholding the principles of a democratic society and ensuring the rights and freedoms of the citizens.
Additionally, the constitution addressed various aspects of governance, including land distribution, taxation, and public education. It aimed to establish a system of equitable land distribution and promoted the importance of public education as a means of fostering a well-informed citizenry.
Overall, the State Constitution of Coahuila y Tejas in 1827 reflected the aspirations for self-governance, religious tolerance, protection of individual rights, and the establishment of a functioning representative government within the state. These elements formed the basis for the political and social structure of Coahuila y Tejas during that period.
Learn more about Constiution:
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ11
What three endeavors in the 20th century led to drastic reductions in the mortality from infectious disease in the United States
Answers
Answer:
There were several endeavors in the 20th century that led to drastic reductions in the mortality from infectious disease in the United States. Here are three examples:
Improved public health infrastructure: The establishment of public health agencies and the implementation of effective disease prevention and control measures, such as vaccination programs and clean water initiatives, played a major role in reducing the mortality from infectious disease in the United States.
Antibiotic development: The discovery and development of antibiotics in the mid-20th century revolutionized the treatment of bacterial infections and significantly reduced mortality from infectious disease.
Improved sanitation and hygiene: Improved sanitation and hygiene practices, such as the widespread use of hand washing and the implementation of effective sewage treatment systems, also contributed to the reduction of mortality from infectious disease in the United States.
HELP!!!
Why is the Declaration of Independence considered a revolutionary document?
Answers
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence is one of the most important documents in the history of the United States. It was an official act taken by all 13 American colonies in declaring independence from British rule. ... The war between the colonies and Great Britain was called the American Revolutionary War (1775-1783).
Explanation:
Answer:
The declaration was regarded as a revolutionary document because It abolished the privileges and power given to the French feudal classes. It provided equitable distribution of the burden of taxation and of right to private property. It provided for equality before law and freedom of speech and press.
Explanation:
PLS I HAVE A TEST TODAY!!!
1. What are the similarities and differences between the Han and Gupta empires?
2. What are the similarities and differences between Rome and the Qin empire?
Answers
Answer:
1.) Although Han China and Gupta India were politically stable, Han China's developing bureaucracy was centralized, while Gupta India was much more regionalized. Han China and Gupta India both featured extensive internal trade; however Gupta India was more involved with trade.
2.) Both Rome and Qin were militaristic states. Both were able to develop thanks to being shielded by their geographical position from the great powers in the east. Eventually they were able to gain hegemonic power over a large sector of the ecumene, Italy for Rome and Sichuan for Qin.
1.) a summary about the battle of bunker hill
2.) a summary about the battle of long island
3.) a summary about the battle of trenton
4.) a summary about the battle of saratoga
Answers
Answer: Bunker Hill May 17, 1755, Battle of Long Island August 27, 1776, Battle of Trenton 26.12.1776, Battle of Saratoga autumn 1777.
Explanation:
The attack on Bunker Hill was carried out by members of British troops led by William Howe. He led an army of about 2,500 soldiers, and on the other hand, there were about 1,500 Americans in defense. The battle took place on the Bunker above Hill in Charlestown near Boston. The attack for the British was disastrous because over 1000 soldiers lost their lives. On the other hand, about 400 Americans were killed. The battle also represented a moral victory for the Americans.
The Battle of Long Island took place in what is now Brooklyn, New York. The Barritans sought to conquer territories to control the port. The British were led by William Howe and defeated the American defense in several attacks with the army. Howe had over 30,000 troops. With quality military maneuvers, Howe brought the British army behind the back and the side of the Americans, which led to total disintegration among American troops.
The army of General George Washington defeated the garrison of Hessian mercenaries on December 26, 1776, and January 3, 1777, on two occasions. Victories are considered one of the key details of the war for independence. The battles gave the Americans a huge psychological advantage. The victory established control over New Jersey and led to the unification of American troops. The Battle of Saratoga brought an advantage in the war in favor of the Americans and decided the war's winner for independence. British General John Burgoyne led a large army. The U.S. military surrounded his troops. A British general with two military maneuvers tried unsuccessfully to break out of the ring. In a hopeless situation, he withdrew with the troops in Saratoga and soon had to surrender.
How did the beliefs and actions of Adolf Hitler change world
history?!
Answers
Answer:
he was responsible for starting World War II, which resulted in the deaths of more than 50 million people. It also led to the extension of the Soviet Union's power in eastern, central, and Balkan Europe, enabled a communist movement to eventually achieve control in China, and marked the decisive shift of power away from western Europe and toward the United States and the Soviet Union. In addition, Hitler was responsible for the Holocaust, the state-sponsored killing of six million Jews and millions of others.
Plssss help!
How can environmental factors help civilizations
grow?
Answers
Why was rome forced to make peace with macedonia during the first macedonian war?.
Answers
Answer:Rome's army was busy fighting against Hannibal and could not battle Philip V.
Explanation:
How many years in between 1046 and 1216 ( when the conflict between Popes and Monarchs began/ended ).
Answers
Answer: There were 170 years in between
all of the following were true about the expansion of the ottoman empire exceptgroup of answer choicesunder selim i, the ottomans controlled the middle east and north africa.by the early sixteenth century, ottoman power allowed murad to conquer african ethiopia.
Answers
All of the following were true about the expansion of the ottoman empire, the ottomans controlled the middle east and north africa.by the early sixteenth century.
Osman I established the Ottoman Empire as a minor beylik in 1299, south of the Byzantine capital of Constantinople in northwest Asia Minor. By capturing nearby Bursa in 1326, the Ottomans cut off Asia Minor from Byzantine rule. Following their initial entry into Europe in 1352, the Ottomans built a permanent colony at impe Castle on the Dardanelles in 1354, and in 1369, they relocated their capital to Edirne (Adrianople).
At the same period, the various tiny Turkic republics in Asia Minor were conquered or pledged allegiance to the emerging Ottoman sultanate. Suleiman the Magnificent led the empire to its height during the 16th century, when it spanned from Yemen in the south to Hungary and portions of Ukraine in the north, and from the Persian Gulf in the east to Algeria in the west. Suleiman's reign is regarded by proponents of the Ottoman decline theory as the pinnacle of the Ottoman classical period, a time when Ottoman politics, culture, and the arts were at their height.
To know more about Ottoman Empire visit: https://brainly.com/question/19594628
#SPJ4
Identify the elements of Boccaccio's writing that demonstrate each feature of humanism: +
Literacy:
Start typing here...
Growing Equality of Women:
Scientific Interest in Nature:
Use of the Vernacular:
Striving Against Fortune:
Expressing Personal Thoughts
and Feelings:
Answers
The writer Boccacio used writing to demonstarte the different features of humanism.
How he portrayed the Equality of WomenHe portrayed women as resilientStrongCunning and SmartPatientHow he portrayed Scientific Interest in Nature
This is about the plague and how it ravished people till they had to start moving away
How Boccaccio uses vernaularHe made use of the Tuscan as the language for poetry. He and several others used this instead of Latin.
The feature of humanism in Striving Against FortuneLife is full of ups and down. As people, one must continue to thrive and accept life as it is.
Read more on Boccaccio here: https://brainly.com/question/2192745
The elements that express humanism are the increasing equality of women, scientific interest in nature, and the use of the vernacular.
What was humanism in literature?It was the movement of transition between the Middle Ages and the Modern.It was the literary movement between troubadourism and the renaissance.It was the movement that highlighted texts with philosophical, moral, and social ideas.It was the movement that valued human beings and their capabilities.Boccaccio was one of the great names of humanism and his works highlighted the position of women in society, the ability of humans to understand science, and the language of each region.
Learn more about humanism at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11229534
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Place the technological advancements in the order in which they emerged.
Answers
Answer:
How are we supposed to answer it if we dont have the image?
Explanation:
HELP IMMEDIATELY.
The Nazi party most strongly appealed to the German people because it
was founded by former soldiers.
blamed others for losing the war.
provided arms to the young people.
developed a strong militia and army.
Answers
Answer:
hi! the answer is b.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Blamed other for losing the war
Explanation:
Why were the officials central
government under the Articles of
Confederation in the U.S. unable to help
Massachusetts during Shay's Rebellion?
A. They did not want to get involved in interstate conflicts.
B. They did not have the power to get involved in interstate
conflicts.
C. They did not want to play favorites with the states.
Answers
B. They did not have the power to get involved in interstate conflicts.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States, but was very weak and gave little power to the federal government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not draft soldiers, regulate trade, tax the states, or even create and enforce laws properly.
Shay's Rebellion truly showed the people how weak the Articles of Confederation was, as the government could do nothing to actually stop the rebellion. Farmers who were in debt began to revolt against courts, causing an uprising and causing many people to get involved. These people tried to stop the courts from taking away possessions and land from them, as they were in debt, which they blamed on the economy and high taxes.
Since the Articles of Confederation could not draft soldiers and did not have the money to pay an army, as they could not tax the states, they had no way of ending the Shay's Rebellion. This truly made people realize that they needed something different from the Articles of Confederation and how it was harming the country.
The Shay's Rebellion was one of the reasons the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called, as people realized they needed to amend the Articles and make it less weak. While this was the original goal, the Articles of Confederation ended up getting scrapped and the United States Constitution was created instead. Although some people did not want the United States Constitution, as they feared the federal government obtaining power, the Bill of Rights was created in order to protect the rights of the people.
An article was recently published concerning the evidence of cardiac death attributable to the earthquake in Los Angeles County on January 17, 1994. In the week before the earthquake, there were on average of 15.6 cardiac deaths per day in Los Angeles County. On the day of the earthquake, there were 51 cardiac deaths. Is the occurrence of 51 deaths an unusual occurrence?
Answers
Yes, the occurrence of 51 cardiac deaths on the day of the earthquake is an unusual occurrence.
An article was recently published concerning the evidence of cardiac death attributable to the earthquake in Los Angeles County on January 17, 1994. In the week before the earthquake, there were on average 15.6 cardiac deaths per day in Los Angeles County. On the day of the earthquake, there were 51 cardiac deaths which is a significant rise in the daily average in the given week. The hypothesis test can be conducted to verify the results obtained from the given data.
The null hypothesis, H0: μ=15.6 cardiac deaths per day
The alternative hypothesis, Ha: μ>15.6 cardiac deaths per day.
The level of significance, α=0.05Z = (51 - 15.6) / [(15.6 / 7)^0.5]≈ 21.86.
It can be concluded that the occurrence of 51 cardiac deaths on the day of the earthquake is an unusual occurrence.
To know more about cardiac death, visit
https://brainly.com/question/31750288
#SPJ11
if you were a paleoanthropologist looking for fossils dating to the divergence of humans from chimpanzees, which color sediments would you explore?
Answers
I will explore Brown color sediments, if I were a paleoanthropologist looking for fossils dating to the divergence of humans from chimpanzees.
Understanding that paleoanthropology is a subfield of anthropology and having a basic understanding of archaeology dating methods, cultural evolution, Darwinian theory, genetics, and primate behaviours are prerequisites for studying paleoanthropology effectively.
Hominids began diverging from other primates between 8 and 6 million years ago. This knowledge is derived from the fossilised remains of primates, genetic research on living primates, including humans and other extant species, and the history of climatic and environmental change during the evolution of these species.
To know more about Evolution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13492988
#SPJ4
In your opinion, are the modern us constitution and the new york constitution of 1777 more alike or more different?
Answers
The Constitution of the United States and the New York Constitution of 1777 are similar in some ways and different in others.
The two documents are also similar in that they both have a bill of rights that guarantees certain rights to the people. The Bill of Rights in the Constitution of the United States guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and the right to bear arms, among other rights.
However, the two documents are also different in some ways. The Constitution of the United States is a more complex document that is designed to apply to the entire country. It is also a living document that can be amended as needed. The New York Constitution of 1777, on the other hand, is a simpler document that was designed to apply only to the state of New York. It is also a static document that cannot be amended.
In conclusion, the modern US Constitution and the New York Constitution of 1777 have both similarities and differences. They both establish a system of government that is based on the separation of powers and have a bill of rights that guarantees certain rights to the people.
However, the modern US Constitution is more complex and designed to apply to the entire country, while the New York Constitution of 1777 is a simpler document that was designed to apply only to the state of New York.
To know more about speech visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31881621
#SPJ11
Why was the League of Nations created and why did Congress reject U.S. participation in the League?
Answers
Motivated by Republican concerns that the League would commit the United States to an expensive organization that would reduce the United States' ability to defend its own interests, Lodge led the opposition to joining the League.
Explain the impact of scientific ideas on Europe.(1 point)
a. New scientific discoveries were always immediately accepted.
b. New scientific discoveries initially were widely accepted, but they later were rejected for contradicting religious doctrine.
c. New scientific discoveries initially were considered threats to religious views, but they later became widespread and accepted.
d. Scientific discoveries were always considered threats, as they challenged religious doctrine
Answers
The emergence of scientific ideas in Europe is most supported by the statement "the new scientific discoveries initially were considered threats to religious views, but they later became widespread and accepted". The Option B is correct.
What was the impact of Scientific Revolution in Europe?This social and religious movement allowed new ideas and perspectives to spread. Changes occurred in the social structure as well. The Renaissance and Reformation had an impact on the philosophical discoveries or theories generated during the Scientific Revolution. More discoveries resulted in even more changes.
Because it demonstrated the power of the human mind, the Scientific Revolution influenced the development of Enlightenment values of individualism. The ability of scientists to reach their own conclusions rather than deferring to instilled authority validated the individual's capabilities and worth.
In conclusion, the key effects of the Scientific Revolution was that it resulted in the spread of new ideas throughout Europe and as well challenged the traditional authority of the Catholic Church since European scientists proved that many Church teachings were incorrect.
Read more about Scientific Revolution
brainly.com/question/14231443
#SPJ1
Please help with this I'll give 7 points
The Ming Dynasty was known for the establishment of a national economy. Decades after Emperor Yongle died, his successors converted Chinese currency from paper money to silver coins. True or False
Answers
Answer:
The Ming Dynasty ruled China from 1368 to 1644 A.D., during which China's population would double. Known for its trade expansion to the outside world that established cultural ties with the West, the Ming Dynasty is also remembered for its drama, literature and world-renowned porcelain.
Explanation:
I hope this helps and pls mark me brainliest :)
The Sherman Anti-trust Act has been amended several times over the years. This version includes amendments passed in 2004.
Section 2. Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.
–Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)
Why would punishments for breaking the law be different for corporations and individuals?
Corporations are usually larger and would require a steeper punishment for it to be effective.
Individuals wrote the act, so they made the punishment less for themselves.
Corporations are more likely than individuals to attempt to monopolize.
Individuals could not afford as large a fine as corporations could.
Answers
The punishments for breaking the law are different for corporations and individuals because A. Corporations are usually larger and would require a steeper punishment for it to be effective as shown in the Sherman Anti-trust Act.
What is the Sherman Anti-trust Act?The Sherman Anti-trust Act was a law enacted to prevent monopolies (both corporate and individuals) from controlling the prices of goods.
It was stipulated to maintain a competitive marketplace in order to protect consumers.
The major purpose of the Sherman Anti-trust Act was to discourage monopolies from artificially raising prices and to curtail trade hoarding of goods.
Learn more about the purpose of the Sherman Anti-trust Act at brainly.com/question/8841995.
#SPJ1
who is constantino mother +why is important
Answers
Answer:
bc yeahbc yeahbc yeahbc yeahvvvvvvvbc yeah
Explanation:
PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!! PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!! PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!! PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!! PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!! PLSSS HELPPPP I WILLL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!!!! ASAPPPP
Why did many Americans want the U.S. to take over Florida? What problems were farmers in Georgia having?